REX REED: 'MOTHER!' Worst Movie of Century

[The Starmaker]

sorry, I didn't get a chance to boycott/picket the movie theaters nationwide..



Can someone knock down the Hollywood Sign?


http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/





http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/mother-some-viewers-completely-perplexed-angered-by-film-1039866

[alvey]

On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 12:25:02 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

> sorry, I didn't get a chance to boycott/picket the movie theaters nationwide..
>
> Can someone knock down the Hollywood Sign?
>
> http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/
>

That's a seriously savage review. Good to see!



alvey

[moviePig]

I'm not reading the review, because I plan to see the movie. (Whatever
else, Darrenofsky is never ineffectual.) But, fwiw, I do know that Rex
Reed lives to scathe...

--

- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com

[alvey]

On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 17:54:01 -0400, moviePig wrote:

> On 9/16/2017 5:48 PM, alvey wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 12:25:02 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> sorry, I didn't get a chance to boycott/picket the movie theaters nationwide..
>>>
>>> Can someone knock down the Hollywood Sign?
>>>
>>> http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/
>>>
>>
>> That's a seriously savage review. Good to see!
>
> I'm not reading the review, because I plan to see the movie. (Whatever
> else, Darrenofsky is never ineffectual.) But, fwiw, I do know that Rex
> Reed lives to scathe...

He'd be happy as a pig in then as there is much to scathe on in cinema
these days. I cannot recall the last first class movie I saw. Shirley it
wasn't 'No Country For Old Men'? There must've been *something* in the last
decade? Damn this Alchozimers!


alvey

[william ahearn]

On Saturday, September 16, 2017 at 5:54:05 PM UTC-4, moviePig wrote:

> I'm not reading the review, because I plan to see the movie. (Whatever
> else, Darrenofsky is never ineffectual.) But, fwiw, I do know that Rex
> Reed lives to scathe...
>

Then you better ignore all of the reviews. The film is getting a whole lotta backlash.

[Dimensional Traveler]

I don't know what the running time on 'Mother' is but the director has
stated that 66 minutes of it are nothing but close up shots of Jennifer
Lawrence's face.


--
Inquiring minds want to know while minds with a self-preservation
instinct are running screaming.

[alvey]

I'm sure that we've all seen the close-up shots over JL's face...


alvey

[anim8rfsk]

In article <opk8lm$1or$1...@dont-email.me>,

121 minutes, so maybe like half.

--
Join your old RAT friends at
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1688985234647266/

[Lewis]

In message <59bd9d7a$0$5089$b1db1813$306e...@news.astraweb.com> moviePig <pwal...@moviepig.com> wrote:
> On 9/16/2017 5:48 PM, alvey wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 12:25:02 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> sorry, I didn't get a chance to boycott/picket the movie theaters nationwide..
>>>
>>> Can someone knock down the Hollywood Sign?
>>>
>>> http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/
>>>
>>
>> That's a seriously savage review. Good to see!

> I'm not reading the review, because I plan to see the movie. (Whatever
> else, Darrenofsky is never ineffectual.) But, fwiw, I do know that Rex
> Reed lives to scathe...

Rex Reed is quite possibly the most incompetent and incoherent "critic"
of all time. I value his opinion on movies as much as the opinion of a
passing chipmunk.

--
'There's stranger people in this world than Corporal Nobbs, my lad.'
Carrot's expression slid into a rictus of intrigued horror. 'Gosh.'

[reilloc]

On 9/16/2017 4:54 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 9/16/2017 5:48 PM, alvey wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 12:25:02 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> sorry, I didn't get a chance to boycott/picket the movie theaters
>>> nationwide..
>>>
>>> Can someone knock down the Hollywood Sign?
>>>
>>> http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That's a seriously savage review. Good to see!
>
> I'm not reading the review, because I plan to see the movie.  (Whatever
> else, Darrenofsky is never ineffectual.)  But, fwiw, I do know that Rex
> Reed lives to scathe...
>

Do not read the article. Original link should have contained spoiler
warning.

LNC

[reilloc]

You've seen it? It's that bad?

LNC

[Steve L]

On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 17:54:01 -0400, moviePig <pwal...@moviepig.com>
wrote:

>On 9/16/2017 5:48 PM, alvey wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 12:25:02 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> sorry, I didn't get a chance to boycott/picket the movie theaters nationwide..
>>>
>>> Can someone knock down the Hollywood Sign?
>>>
>>> http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/
>>>
>>
>> That's a seriously savage review. Good to see!
>
>I'm not reading the review, because I plan to see the movie. (Whatever
>else, Darrenofsky is never ineffectual.) But, fwiw, I do know that Rex
>Reed lives to scathe...

Don't go to IMDB either. No saying anything more.

[Bill Anderson]

FWIW I read the full synopsis and that was all I needed from this movie.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother!

--
Bill Anderson

I am the Mighty Favog

[william ahearn]

On Sunday, September 17, 2017 at 2:39:11 PM UTC-4, Bill Anderson wrote:
>
> FWIW I read the full synopsis and that was all I needed from this movie.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother!
>

Huh?

[moviePig]

But you said roughly the same of THE HUNT ...which raises the question
of which is the direr risk: seeing a bad movie or spoiling a good one?

[The Starmaker]

"the director’s current personal squeeze"


"The actress’s face occupies a full 66 minutes of the 120-minute running time..."

http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/


This is not a movie. It's a 'commercial'.


The goal of the director, is to squeeze her like guys like to squeeze girls, in all the right places.

And in resturn he promises her to make her the biggest star in the world!

How Jennifer Lawrence ask her director while he squeezes her breast?

He tells her "I'm going to make you the biggest star in the world" and then he explans How he will do it,
while he is squeezeing her in all the right places....(it's his personal squeeze)

He tells her (while he is drooling all over her)...


'I'm going to occupy your face on the screen throughout most of the movie, (at least 66 minutes).
This will leave a lasting impression on the audience mind that they will always remember. It is like
a Brand, the Jennifer Lawrence stamped on their brain. A 66 minute commercial of your face!

Then she ask while he is pulling down her panties and drooling all over her breast, how does that make me a bigger star
than??? (Cause Jennifer Lawrence is only with him because actresses hook up with producers/directors to get more work in movies)

He tells her...'It is very complex to explain but the reason why people go to movies is to see a big face on the screen.'

But she persist with her questions because (that's all an actress is interested in, herself) , ask what does the big face
on the screen does to them?

He tells her while he is drooling on her high heels...


"The title of the movie is "Mother"! (He's getting bothered will all this talking about showbusiness because he running out of drool!)

She sez, "What does that mean, The title of the movie is "Mother"????

He tells her (as he puts a pillow on her face)..."Every guy loves their Mother. The face a baby sees that makes him the happiest is
seeing the big face of his Mother looking at him. So, when they see your face on the screen...





Your drooling ends.
You're done with me.
You've had your fun.
You're spent.

NOW GO MAKE THAT FUCKIN MOVIE YOU PERVERT!!!


The Jennifer Lawrence asks the drooling director..."What the next movie going to be about?"


That one I'm going to have to tie you up...


it's what every mother tells her son to stay away from.



The Starmaker - Where Stars are made....overnight!

[The Starmaker]

I'm going to download the movie, edit in half, I just want to see the 66 minutes of her face!

[The Starmaker]

I'm sorry I won't be there to picket the movie to proctect you from
being robbed, ...but
if you get pass the picket line...and see the movie, and What if you
didn't like it...
will you ask for a refund? Or are you too afraid to ask for a refund?

Don't forget to get a refund for the popcorn and candy...

and the coke. (too much ice or not enough ice?)

(candy didn't taste like candy)


(give them back the popcorn cup and tell'm you're settle for half the
popcorn price)

[The Starmaker]

Rex Reed is the best movie critic in the world.

[The Starmaker]

not the 66 minutes of her face..


are there any pictures of her naked on the internet? or do i got to buy it from the squeezing director??



I don't like to buy wet pictures from the director....

[Bill Anderson]

I don't know how to respond other than to repeat myself. The synopsis
explained the uproar. Any curiosity I may have had about the movie was
satisfied in 60 seconds. Yay. That's all I needed.

[Michael OConnor]

> I'm going to download the movie, edit in half, I just want to see the 66 minutes of her face!

I'm sure somebody will splice together the 66 minutes of Jennifer Lawrence's face into one continuous youtube video.

[Bill Anderson]

I think maybe the big difference between our positions is that in most
cases -- not all; think THE SIXTH SENSE -- I don't care if prior to
experiencing a story I have a general, even if possibly mistaken, idea
of how it will play out. Vague hints are a factor to be sure, but often
not crucial to my enjoyment. One seldom encounters a THE SIXTH SENSE.

And sometimes, as with MOTHER, full advance knowledge makes me a happy
camper. THE HUNT? I can only wish. <grumbleitwasallyourfaultgrumble>

Yeah, for me the direr risk is seeing a movie I hate hate hate when the
experience could have been avoided with just a little tiny itsy bitsy
bit of advance warning. That's all I'd processed about MOTHER, but it
was enough to send me to the Wikipedia plot summary which satisfied for
all time any temptation I might have had to have a look. There are lots
of movies out there that I'll enjoy, or at the very least won't make me
regret spending time with them. Bring on the considerate reviews.

[moviePig]

Just to be clear, *my* position is that you can have a position
different from mine (of course). Materially, though, my biggest dread
in watching a movie is boredom -- which I experience whenever I know
where a movie is going and it thinks I don't. But I can't think of any
movies I've turned off for their subject matter, even when unpleasant
(though Shirley there must be a couple). However, I confess a separate
component to my hate for spoiling: I think it's lazy, destructive
pandering. But, hell, everybody needs to feel smug about something...

[Bill Anderson]

I wouldn't dream of spoiling MOTHER for you by telling you what it is
that put me off it, but I will say the problem isn't unpleasant subject
matter. It's just...well I can't say, can I?

[hector]

Leonard Maltin hated it too.

[Lewis]

In message <osa6fd$7gi$2...@dont-email.me> hector <bob...@there.com> wrote:
> On 17/09/2017 5:25 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> sorry, I didn't get a chance to boycott/picket the movie theaters nationwide..
>>
>>
>>
>> Can someone knock down the Hollywood Sign?
>>
>>
>> http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/

Rex Reed is still an idiot. He starts of by insulting Requiem For Dream
and Black Swan, exposing him as a moron with no taste.

>> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/mother-some-viewers-completely-perplexed-angered-by-film-1039866

> Leonard Maltin hated it too.

He is less of an idiot then Rex Reed, but not by much.

(Not that I am defending Mother, I've not seen it, but the opinions of
these two would not sway me one iota).

--
'Things either exist or they don't,' said Jeremy. 'I am very clear about
that. I have medicine.' --The Thief of Time

[trotsky]

On 10/19/17 8:36 AM, Lewis wrote:
> In message <osa6fd$7gi$2...@dont-email.me> hector <bob...@there.com> wrote:
>> On 17/09/2017 5:25 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> sorry, I didn't get a chance to boycott/picket the movie theaters nationwide..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can someone knock down the Hollywood Sign?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://observer.com/2017/09/darren-aronofsky-mother-worst-movie-of-the-year/
>
> Rex Reed is still an idiot. He starts of by insulting Requiem For Dream
> and Black Swan, exposing him as a moron with no taste.

It would be ironic if he was rated worst critic of the century.

[Lewis]

I'd certainly nominate him. I think of the ones who are somewhat well
known or recognized, he's in like Flynn.

Sadly, he is not just a bad reviewer with no taste, but also a worthless
one. With some critics you can tell if the movie is good despite their
panning it, or tell if a movie is bad despite their praise. Not so with
Rex Reed who is so inconsistent and inane in what he says that the
possibility he's nothing more than a poorly done AI-bot seems
unreasonably high.

--
"His mother should have thrown him away and kept the stork." - Mae West

[Your Name]

How would you ever tell?? *All* movie critics are pinheaded fools.

[trotsky]

I didn't even know he was still alive, I thought he'd died of AIDS or
something.

[william ahearn]

On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 8:08:57 PM UTC-4, Greg Singh wrote:
>
>
> I didn't even know he was still alive, I thought he'd died of AIDS or
> something.

And the ole homophobe is back.

[trotsky]

Actually, shit for brains, insinuating AIDS is a gay only disease makes
you the homophobe. Should I cite the statistics for you?

[The Starmaker]

Oh, you're just saying that...he's probably your favorite movie critic
of all time. You could not name a better critic than Rex Reed.

[william ahearn]

On Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 2:11:02 PM UTC-4, Greg Singh wrote:
>
>
> Actually, shit for brains, insinuating AIDS is a gay only disease makes
> you the homophobe. Should I cite the statistics for you?

Considering your known and previous behavior, statistics are irrelevant. We know who you are and what you are and once again you've proved it.

[trotsky]

On 10/21/17 5:00 PM, william ahearn wrote:
> On Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 2:11:02 PM UTC-4, Greg Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> Actually, shit for brains, insinuating AIDS is a gay only disease makes
>> you the homophobe. Should I cite the statistics for you?
>
> Considering your known and previous behavior, statistics are irrelevant.

What a monumentally stupid thing to say. Are you just too chickenshit
to admit your mistake? What new?

[trotsky]

Don't you have some stars to go make?

[william ahearn]

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 8:18:45 AM UTC-4, Greg Singh wrote:

> What a monumentally stupid thing to say. Are you just too chickenshit
> to admit your mistake? What new?

No, it isn't. When do you start with "self-awareness"? Once again, thanks for the laugh.

[trotsky]

On 10/22/17 12:06 PM, william ahearn wrote:
> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 8:18:45 AM UTC-4, Greg Singh wrote:
>
>> What a monumentally stupid thing to say. Are you just too chickenshit
>> to admit your mistake? What new?
>
> No, it isn't.

You're lying.

[william ahearn]

And you're totally played out. You've got nothing left. The same old shit over and over again. You're not funny, you're just boring.

[trotsky]

Because everything you post is declaration of intellectual bankruptcy.
You're the shittiest fucking troll I've seen in twenty years on Usenet.
You're use of social media is on par with Trump's. IOW you suck. Is
any of this getting through, buddy?

[william ahearn]

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 2:26:59 PM UTC-4, Greg Singh wrote:
>
> Because everything you post is declaration of intellectual bankruptcy.
> You're the shittiest fucking troll I've seen in twenty years on Usenet.
> You're use of social media is on par with Trump's. IOW you suck. Is
> any of this getting through, buddy?

I rest my case. The little turd who can't be flushed spouting that same silly insults he has used for years. Bye bye. Your pathetic lashing out is wearing thin. Thanks for the laughs.

[trotsky]

Laughs? You sound like you're sitting in a pool of your own hemorrhoids.

[The Starmaker]

Tell your sister to come to my hotel room and watch me take a shower.

[trotsky]

Okay Harvey.

[A Friend]

In article <qK7HB.32944$4A2....@fx40.iad>, trotsky

Somebody please save the potted plant.

[trotsky]

In Starmaker's case it would be somebody please save the pot.

[iamebo...@gmail.com]

Greg, I am almost CERTAIN Rex Reed DID die of Aids! I'm NOT playing or joking! I think there is some Mandela Effect going on here! I'm VERY serious!!

[Alan Smithee]

Some called "Jumanji" the worst movie of 2017. It just passed $850 million.