Holy shit, I don't understand a thing.
I liked the film a lot when I saw it, defended it to many people who
claimed to hate it elsewhere, but I can't remember any of the film's
details right now. But others should see this film!
> But others should see this film!
Yes, it's a great film.
Okay, I rewatched the ending and figured it out. Someone correct me if
I'm wrong. Jack, suspecting from the git-go that Mathilde is going to
kill him, designs the rifle so that that special ugly-looking bullet
will fire at *her* rather than at anyone. Pavel shows up in the
village to make sure things go as planned, and Pavel does get off one
shot that ultimately kills Jack. (But what the hell does Ebert mean
when he says that "once, and only once" the endearment "Mr. Butterfly"
is said by the wrong person? Dude's getting as recondite as a freshman
film major.)
There is a scene in which the prostitute calls him Mr. Butterfly, but
the butterfly association is with the assassin. I got very confused
(Unless he was sleeping with the assassin?)
> There is a scene in which the prostitute calls him Mr. Butterfly, but
> the butterfly association is with the assassin. I got very confused
> (Unless he was sleeping with the assassin?)
Yeah, I know; I couldn't figure out what the purpose of the assassin
was, because the suggestion definitely is that they slept together.
Also, the assassin and the prostitute physically resembled each other.
Confusing but good movie, definitely better than several nominated for
best picture.
It is the assassin (Mathilde) who calls him Mr. Butterfly on their
picnic. So when Clara uses the same phrase, it hints that she and the
assassin are connected somehow (as does the scene where Jack watches
Clara through a long-focus camera).
But they aren't connected, and that's Mathilde, not Clara, that he sees
with the telephoto lens.
--
Bill Anderson
I am the Mighty Favog
That scene is the most confusing in the film, because earlier, Mister
Butterfly *had* seen Clara with the telephoto lens.
God, I loved this movie. :)