I'll admit I haven't seen either one (yes, I haven't seen Akira
yet; you may pick up your jaws), but this review points to a lot of
similarities between the two:
<
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/53299>
This paragraph in particular has an interesting theory:
"Why did Warner Brothers suddenly decide to close shop on their AKIRA
live-action movie? I can't be certain, but I'd like to think that
this screened for the top brass and when it was done, someone shook
their head and said, "Shut it down, boys." Sure, AKIRA's far larger
in scale than this, but CHRONICLE gets the essentials right - a power
barely contained, a friendship tested, and a young man, bullied all
his life, who goes out of control with his newfound ability and how
his friends try to stop him. Since it's told in the "found footage"
medium, there is a slight distancing effect, especially in some of the
crazier scenes, because you're wondering who in the hell would be
working a camera at that moment, but then the movie has a breakthrough
and explains perfectly why the filmmakers made it this way."
So, Akira can't really be remade, even by modern Japan. Chronicle
may be as close as we come to live-action Akira, and perhaps as close
as we *should* come to live-action Akira.