Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Obama Resigns the Presidency!!!!
10 views
Skip to first unread message
Irish Mike
Oct 22, 2012, 5:51:34 AM10/22/12
to
WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
Presidency of the United States!
President Barack Obama has shocked the nation! He called the White
House Staff into the Oval Office and announced that he is going to
resign as President of the United States. He has conceded the
election to Mitt Romney.
The President has notified the broadcast networks that he wants to
address the nation Friday (October 5th) night at 8pm. With the
faltering economy, the potential overturning of Obamacare, his low
approval level and after his devastating loss to Mitt Romney in the
first Presidential debate – with dwindling donors – he has decided to
call it quits.
President Obama faces numerous challenges at home and abroad. The
economy is getting worse and everything he does seems to make it
worse. Many in the White House feel that the President has fallen
into a deep depression. There are rumors that he started taking
Prozac last week.
He also does not feel that he has the experience on foreign policy to
handle the ongoing conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan as well as the new
military action in Libya in addition to the turmoil in the Middle
East.
But the President will seek to immediately calm Americans.
“I know that Joe Biden will be more than capable of stepping into the
Presidency. He already is putting together his new cabinet,”
President Obama told his staff. “Joe can hold the fort until Mitt
takes over in January.”
White House Press Secretary, Jay Carney, would not comment, but said
that the President will be “perfectly clear about his resignation
tonight.”
Joe Biden was unavailable, but WWN talked to members of Biden’s staff,
who say Biden is confident that he can handle all the challenges
facing the country. “Joe is an expert on foreign policy. He knows he
can deal effectively and swiftly with all military conflicts around
the world.”
Rumors are that Biden may appoint Hillary Clinton as his Vice
President. Further rumors have Joe Biden resigning in August, which
would make Hillary President and put her in position to easily win re-
election in November of 2012. Events are progressing rapidly
weeklyworldnews.com/politics/31337/obama-resigns/
Irish Mike
In spite all of the lies, distortions and smear attacks the Democrats
have
hurled at Romney, he still has one advantage. Obama's miserable
record,
failed economic policies and lack of leadership.
Presidency of the United States!
President Barack Obama has shocked the nation! He called the White
House Staff into the Oval Office and announced that he is going to
resign as President of the United States. He has conceded the
election to Mitt Romney.
The President has notified the broadcast networks that he wants to
address the nation Friday (October 5th) night at 8pm. With the
faltering economy, the potential overturning of Obamacare, his low
approval level and after his devastating loss to Mitt Romney in the
first Presidential debate – with dwindling donors – he has decided to
call it quits.
President Obama faces numerous challenges at home and abroad. The
economy is getting worse and everything he does seems to make it
worse. Many in the White House feel that the President has fallen
into a deep depression. There are rumors that he started taking
Prozac last week.
He also does not feel that he has the experience on foreign policy to
handle the ongoing conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan as well as the new
military action in Libya in addition to the turmoil in the Middle
East.
But the President will seek to immediately calm Americans.
“I know that Joe Biden will be more than capable of stepping into the
Presidency. He already is putting together his new cabinet,”
President Obama told his staff. “Joe can hold the fort until Mitt
takes over in January.”
White House Press Secretary, Jay Carney, would not comment, but said
that the President will be “perfectly clear about his resignation
tonight.”
Joe Biden was unavailable, but WWN talked to members of Biden’s staff,
who say Biden is confident that he can handle all the challenges
facing the country. “Joe is an expert on foreign policy. He knows he
can deal effectively and swiftly with all military conflicts around
the world.”
Rumors are that Biden may appoint Hillary Clinton as his Vice
President. Further rumors have Joe Biden resigning in August, which
would make Hillary President and put her in position to easily win re-
election in November of 2012. Events are progressing rapidly
weeklyworldnews.com/politics/31337/obama-resigns/
Irish Mike
In spite all of the lies, distortions and smear attacks the Democrats
have
hurled at Romney, he still has one advantage. Obama's miserable
record,
failed economic policies and lack of leadership.
Bradley K. Sherman
Oct 22, 2012, 8:31:49 AM10/22/12
to
Irish Mike <wx...@gobot.com> wrote:
> ...
|
| Through Friday, since Mr. Obama's inauguration -- his
| first 1,368 days in office -- the Dow Jones industrial
| average has gained 67.9 percent. That's an extremely strong
| performance -- the fifth best for an equivalent period
| among all American presidents since 1900. The Bespoke
| Investment Group calculated those returns for The New York
| Times.
|
| The best showing occurred in Franklin D. Roosevelt's first
| term, when the market rose by a whopping 238.1 percent. Of
| course, that followed a calamitous decline. When his term
| started, the Dow had fallen to one-fourth of its former
| peak. In 2008, the year before Mr. Obama took office, the
| Dow declined by roughly one-third.
| ...
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/21/your-money/wall-st-may-not-cheer-but-obamas-been-good-for-stocks.html>
--bks
> ...
>President Obama faces numerous challenges at home and abroad. The
>economy is getting worse and ...
|
| Through Friday, since Mr. Obama's inauguration -- his
| first 1,368 days in office -- the Dow Jones industrial
| average has gained 67.9 percent. That's an extremely strong
| performance -- the fifth best for an equivalent period
| among all American presidents since 1900. The Bespoke
| Investment Group calculated those returns for The New York
| Times.
|
| The best showing occurred in Franklin D. Roosevelt's first
| term, when the market rose by a whopping 238.1 percent. Of
| course, that followed a calamitous decline. When his term
| started, the Dow had fallen to one-fourth of its former
| peak. In 2008, the year before Mr. Obama took office, the
| Dow declined by roughly one-third.
| ...
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/21/your-money/wall-st-may-not-cheer-but-obamas-been-good-for-stocks.html>
--bks
trotsky
Oct 22, 2012, 9:02:45 AM10/22/12
to
calvin
Oct 22, 2012, 9:48:07 AM10/22/12
to
Two even bigger fantasies:
JOHNSON DECIDES NOT TO RUN FOR SECOND ELECTED TERM
NIXON RESIGNS IN MIDDLE OF SECOND TERM
JOHNSON DECIDES NOT TO RUN FOR SECOND ELECTED TERM
NIXON RESIGNS IN MIDDLE OF SECOND TERM
NapalmHeart
Oct 22, 2012, 10:45:21 AM10/22/12
to
"Bradley K. Sherman" <b...@panix.com> wrote in message
news:k63ebl$lq4$1...@reader1.panix.com...
up numerically the purchasing power of the dollar is down, mainly due to QE
infinity and the effect it has had on the value of the dollar. Items cost
twice as much as they did 4 years ago, not because the value of the
individual items his increased, but because of the fall of the dollar. If
you want more of the same vote for more government interference in the
economy and reelect Obama. If you want a chance at real economic growth and
stability vote for Romney. Not that Romney is all that great, but he's
better than the incumbent.
xyzz-Quack!
Oct 22, 2012, 10:46:12 AM10/22/12
to
resigning now so he could start his lobbying career earlier ($1 to
Trent Lott)
Bradley K. Sherman
Oct 22, 2012, 10:58:09 AM10/22/12
to
>> ...
><http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/21/your-money/wall-st-may-not-cheer-but-obamas-been-good-for-stocks.html>
Okay how about this:
|
| Can a businessman help the economy? For presidents, the
| answer has been no.
| ...
| The only president since Hoover with business experience
| under whom the economy did well was the one who was
| unsuccessful in business: Harry Truman, whose haberdashery
| shop went bankrupt after two years.
|
| The startling bottom line is that the nation's GDP has
| grown more than 45 times faster under presidents with
| little or no business experience than it has under
| presidents with successful business careers. And on
| average, when there has been a successful businessman in
| the Oval Office (so, Truman is excluded), GDP growth has
| been negligible.
| ...
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/can-a-businessman-help-the-economy-for-presidents-the-answer-has-been-no/2012/10/19/3e96459e-17ab-11e2-9855-71f2b202721b_story.html>
--bks
><http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/21/your-money/wall-st-may-not-cheer-but-obamas-been-good-for-stocks.html>
>
>In complete information from the NYT, but not unexpected. While stocks are
> ...
>In complete information from the NYT, but not unexpected. While stocks are
Okay how about this:
|
| Can a businessman help the economy? For presidents, the
| answer has been no.
| ...
| The only president since Hoover with business experience
| under whom the economy did well was the one who was
| unsuccessful in business: Harry Truman, whose haberdashery
| shop went bankrupt after two years.
|
| The startling bottom line is that the nation's GDP has
| grown more than 45 times faster under presidents with
| little or no business experience than it has under
| presidents with successful business careers. And on
| average, when there has been a successful businessman in
| the Oval Office (so, Truman is excluded), GDP growth has
| been negligible.
| ...
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/can-a-businessman-help-the-economy-for-presidents-the-answer-has-been-no/2012/10/19/3e96459e-17ab-11e2-9855-71f2b202721b_story.html>
--bks
Ubiquitous
Oct 22, 2012, 5:16:45 AM10/22/12
to
wx...@gobot.com wrote:
>WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
>Presidency of the United States!
Oh, if ONLY!
>WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
>Presidency of the United States!
And you posted this off-topic article here because?
--
"Re-electing Obama is like backing The Titanic up and hitting the
iceberg a second time."
moviePig
Oct 22, 2012, 1:57:31 PM10/22/12
to
On Oct 22, 5:51 am, Irish Mike <w...@gobot.com> wrote:
> WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
> Presidency of the United States!
Oops! Make that "re-signed"...
> Presidency of the United States!
--
- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com
calvin
Oct 22, 2012, 2:35:01 PM10/22/12
to
On Oct 22, 1:57 pm, moviePig <pwall...@moviepig.com> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 5:51 am, Irish Mike <w...@gobot.com> wrote:
>
> > WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
> > Presidency of the United States!
>
> Oops! Make that "re-signed"...
What, you mean changed it from plus to minus?
> On Oct 22, 5:51 am, Irish Mike <w...@gobot.com> wrote:
>
> > WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
> > Presidency of the United States!
>
> Oops! Make that "re-signed"...
The Undead Edward M. Kennedy
Oct 22, 2012, 2:41:31 PM10/22/12
to
"calvin" <cri...@windstream.net> wrote
> > WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
> > Presidency of the United States!
>
> Oops! Make that "re-signed"...
<
<What, you mean changed it from plus to minus?
Yup. In all fairness, Bush started it, but Obama made it much worse.
--Tedward
> > WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
> > Presidency of the United States!
>
> Oops! Make that "re-signed"...
<
<What, you mean changed it from plus to minus?
--Tedward
Bill Steele
Oct 22, 2012, 2:43:14 PM10/22/12
to
In article
<b1896f46-fa02-4525...@4g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
I'll go you one better:
NOBODY RESPONDS TO IORISH MIKE TROLL POSTS
<b1896f46-fa02-4525...@4g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
NOBODY RESPONDS TO IORISH MIKE TROLL POSTS
Dennis J
Oct 22, 2012, 5:24:51 PM10/22/12
to
yeah whatever more like he dialed it back to 5....
--
"HEY Mitt, that huge lead Obama has? YOU BUILT THAT!!!" -- Chris Rock
"Education is the progressive discovery of our own Ignorance" Will Durant
"One can't have a sense of perspective without a sense of Humor" -- Wayne Thiboux
"the Glass is not only half full, it has been delicious so far!!" -- ME
To reply, SCRAPE off the end bits.
The Undead Edward M. Kennedy
Oct 22, 2012, 5:36:36 PM10/22/12
to
"Dennis J" <drju...@frontier.SCRAPE.COM> wrote
>>> > WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
>>> > Presidency of the United States!
>>>
>>> Oops! Make that "re-signed"...
>><
>><What, you mean changed it from plus to minus?
>>
>>Yup. In all fairness, Bush started it, but Obama made it much worse.
>>
>>--Tedward
>>
> he took it to 11!!!!!!!
He! Could! Go! All! The! Way!
> yeah whatever more like he dialed it back to 5....
What? Obama grew the debt/deficit more than Bush. It is a darn
good thing we've got all these gassy unicorns.
--Tedward
>>> > WASHINGTON. BREAKING NEWS *** President Barack Obama has resigned the
>>> > Presidency of the United States!
>>>
>>> Oops! Make that "re-signed"...
>><
>><What, you mean changed it from plus to minus?
>>
>>Yup. In all fairness, Bush started it, but Obama made it much worse.
>>
>>--Tedward
>>
> he took it to 11!!!!!!!
> yeah whatever more like he dialed it back to 5....
good thing we've got all these gassy unicorns.
--Tedward
cloud dreamer
Oct 22, 2012, 5:58:38 PM10/22/12
to
Ever stand at the bottom of the hill and try to stop one???
The incompetence of Bush, his tax cuts, the two wars and the housing
meltdown led to a ballooning deficit.
What? Did you think it would just stop growing on 21 Jan 2009???
Seriously???
And it won't stop growing after Jan 2013, no matter who is in the White
House.
..
cloud dreamer
Oct 22, 2012, 6:04:42 PM10/22/12
to
The Undead Edward M. Kennedy
Oct 22, 2012, 6:14:52 PM10/22/12
to
"cloud dreamer" <red...@reuse.and.recycle.com> wrote in message news:-8CdnfvZs5UQXBjN...@supernews.com...
of Iraq in 2009.
> Seriously???
>
> And it won't stop growing after Jan 2013, no matter who is in the White House.
the deficit by A LOT MORE is fucking stupid.
Or will you, three presidents from now, still be blaming it on Bush?
--Tedward
cloud dreamer
Oct 22, 2012, 6:26:16 PM10/22/12
to
article. It makes it clear how Bush's policies are the driving forces
behind the ballooning deficit.
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3849
You're lucky Obama listened to the economists on how to mitigate the
effects. He kept you from sliding into Depression.
Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing
the deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue to obstruct any
attempt to remove them.
..
Dennis J
Oct 22, 2012, 6:31:51 PM10/22/12
to
finger at Dad...
Dennis J
Oct 22, 2012, 6:32:42 PM10/22/12
to
D0T ]V[atriX
Oct 23, 2012, 2:35:08 AM10/23/12
to
On Oct 22, 6:02 am, trotsky <gmsi...@email.com> wrote:
>
> Bowel Movement Mike resigns from sanity!!
There used to be a Usenet ko0k named "Big Mikey" who used "BM" as his
>
> Bowel Movement Mike resigns from sanity!!
signature. Coincidence?
trotsky
Oct 23, 2012, 7:51:29 AM10/23/12
to
think he's had several socks that he wore.
The Undead Edward M. Kennedy
Oct 23, 2012, 11:31:29 AM10/23/12
to
"cloud dreamer" <red...@reuse.and.recycle.com> wrote
Tax cuts work both ways, and did as much to "avoid the depression" as
government spending, if you drink that economic cool aid.
> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue to
> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
Yeah, Obama's record spending has NOTHING to do with it.
--Tedward
government spending, if you drink that economic cool aid.
> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue to
> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
--Tedward
The Undead Edward M. Kennedy
Oct 23, 2012, 11:33:49 AM10/23/12
to
encouraged giving mortgages to low income borrowers who later defaulted.
The fact that it took a while to come to a head is neither Bush's nor Obama's
fault.
--Tedward
cloud dreamer
Oct 23, 2012, 11:40:56 AM10/23/12
to
Sheesh.
..
The Undead Edward M. Kennedy
Oct 23, 2012, 1:16:36 PM10/23/12
to
"cloud dreamer" <reduce...@recycle.com> wrote
I guess facts don't do what you want them to.
--Tedward
--Tedward
Howard Brazee
Oct 23, 2012, 1:26:45 PM10/23/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:31:29 -0400, "The Undead Edward M. Kennedy"
<e...@o.com> wrote:
>> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue to
>> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
>
>Yeah, Obama's record spending has NOTHING to do with it.
You mean "Congress's record spending". The president only proposes.
<e...@o.com> wrote:
>> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue to
>> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
>
>Yeah, Obama's record spending has NOTHING to do with it.
Half of his administration had a Democrat controlled Congress, the
other half had a Republican controlled Congress. Debt increased
with both Congresses.
--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
- James Madison
cloud dreamer
Oct 23, 2012, 1:30:13 PM10/23/12
to
On 23/10/2012 2:56 PM, Howard Brazee wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:31:29 -0400, "The Undead Edward M. Kennedy"
> <e...@o.com> wrote:
>
>>> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue to
>>> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
>>
>> Yeah, Obama's record spending has NOTHING to do with it.
>
> You mean "Congress's record spending". The president only proposes.
> Half of his administration had a Democrat controlled Congress, the
> other half had a Republican controlled Congress. Debt increased
> with both Congresses.
>
Half of it wasn't controlled by the Democrats. They never got the 60
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:31:29 -0400, "The Undead Edward M. Kennedy"
> <e...@o.com> wrote:
>
>>> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue to
>>> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
>>
>> Yeah, Obama's record spending has NOTHING to do with it.
>
> You mean "Congress's record spending". The president only proposes.
> Half of his administration had a Democrat controlled Congress, the
> other half had a Republican controlled Congress. Debt increased
> with both Congresses.
>
seats they needed. They only held full control for like 42 days of that
time. The rest of the time, the Republicans stifled everything they
tried to do. Otherwise, Obamacare wouldn't have been gutted as much as
it was. The only way to pass it was to please the Republican vultures.
..
The Undead Edward M. Kennedy
Oct 23, 2012, 1:53:17 PM10/23/12
to
"Howard Brazee" <how...@brazee.net> wrote
>>> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue
>>> to
>>> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
>>
>>Yeah, Obama's record spending has NOTHING to do with it.
>
> You mean "Congress's record spending". The president only proposes.
> Half of his administration had a Democrat controlled Congress, the
> other half had a Republican controlled Congress. Debt increased
> with both Congresses.
Technically correct, but the president signed it -- he wasn't over-rode.
And Obama lied about getting out of Iraq. But anyway, we were
comparing the debt under Bush and Obama, not the various sessions
of Congress.
--Tedward
>>> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue
>>> to
>>> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
>>
>>Yeah, Obama's record spending has NOTHING to do with it.
>
> You mean "Congress's record spending". The president only proposes.
> Half of his administration had a Democrat controlled Congress, the
> other half had a Republican controlled Congress. Debt increased
> with both Congresses.
And Obama lied about getting out of Iraq. But anyway, we were
comparing the debt under Bush and Obama, not the various sessions
of Congress.
--Tedward
Dano
Oct 23, 2012, 3:46:31 PM10/23/12
to
"Howard Brazee" wrote in message
news:pnkd881a1q62f8g9k...@4ax.com...
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:31:29 -0400, "The Undead Edward M. Kennedy"
<e...@o.com> wrote:
>> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the
>> deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue to
>> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
>
>Yeah, Obama's record spending has NOTHING to do with it.
You mean "Congress's record spending". The president only proposes.
Half of his administration had a Democrat controlled Congress, the
other half had a Republican controlled Congress. Debt increased
with both Congresses.
============================================
Which BTW Romney has confirmed with his answer whenever he is asked about
his "plan" to balance the budget...especially AFTER he increases defense
spending...while NOT reducing SS or Medicare...and NOT raising ANY taxes.
When pressed he will only say he will work with congress cooperatively
(Ha!).
news:pnkd881a1q62f8g9k...@4ax.com...
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:31:29 -0400, "The Undead Edward M. Kennedy"
<e...@o.com> wrote:
>> Problem is, getting rid of those tax cuts are a huge part of reducing the
>> deficit...which the Republicans in Congress continue to
>> obstruct any attempt to remove them.
>
>Yeah, Obama's record spending has NOTHING to do with it.
You mean "Congress's record spending". The president only proposes.
Half of his administration had a Democrat controlled Congress, the
other half had a Republican controlled Congress. Debt increased
with both Congresses.
Which BTW Romney has confirmed with his answer whenever he is asked about
his "plan" to balance the budget...especially AFTER he increases defense
spending...while NOT reducing SS or Medicare...and NOT raising ANY taxes.
When pressed he will only say he will work with congress cooperatively
(Ha!).
Howard Brazee
Oct 23, 2012, 11:09:10 PM10/23/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:46:31 -0400, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Which BTW Romney has confirmed with his answer whenever he is asked about
>his "plan" to balance the budget...especially AFTER he increases defense
>spending...while NOT reducing SS or Medicare...and NOT raising ANY taxes.
>When pressed he will only say he will work with congress cooperatively
>(Ha!).
He has some secret tax deductions he will get rid of to balance the
budget, as he increases spending and cuts taxes.
Very secret.
wrote:
>Which BTW Romney has confirmed with his answer whenever he is asked about
>his "plan" to balance the budget...especially AFTER he increases defense
>spending...while NOT reducing SS or Medicare...and NOT raising ANY taxes.
>When pressed he will only say he will work with congress cooperatively
>(Ha!).
budget, as he increases spending and cuts taxes.
Very secret.
Dennis J
Oct 24, 2012, 6:05:58 AM10/24/12
to
trust an Aggie...
0 new messages