info
Google 網路論壇不再支援新的 Usenet 貼文或訂閱項目，但過往內容仍可供查看。
Dismiss
M3GAN. Interesting concept SPOILERS
瀏覽次數：22 次
跳到第一則未讀訊息
RichA
2023年1月15日 晚上11:28:152023/1/15
收件者：
Driven millenial engineer inherits a kid whose parents were killed in a car accident. Somehow she creates a thinking, walking, talking android in the space of a week to take care of the kid because she is emotionally incapable or unwilling to care for the kid herself. The android has heuristic learning capability which of course means it develops a growing independence. When the millenial finally tries to bond with the kid, the kid wants no part of her, instead preferring the company of the doll. Friction develops between the doll, the ersatz parent and the android. Millenial wants the formerly home-schooled kid to go to some D.B. outdoor alternative school. Stupidly, she lets the kid take the android to school. Then the fun starts.
T987654321
2023年4月15日 凌晨2:52:542023/4/15
收件者：
Watched the extended cut. Pretty standard tale of what happens when you build a self aware robot without the three laws.
Ed Stasiak
2023年4月17日 下午5:26:152023/4/17
收件者：
> T987654321
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
The third law was included just so Asimov could write sci-fi stories about robots, there is no need for it in the real world
and including it, would only lead to all kinda problems.
>
> Watched the extended cut. Pretty standard tale of what happens when you build a self aware robot without the three laws.
The Three Laws Of Robotics are:
> Watched the extended cut. Pretty standard tale of what happens when you build a self aware robot without the three laws.
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
The third law was included just so Asimov could write sci-fi stories about robots, there is no need for it in the real world
and including it, would only lead to all kinda problems.
RichA
2023年4月18日 凌晨3:19:592023/4/18
收件者：
On Saturday, 15 April 2023 at 02:52:54 UTC-4, T987654321 wrote:
> Watched the extended cut. Pretty standard tale of what happens when you build a self aware robot without the three laws.
One day, someone is going to write an A.I. movie that is as true to speculative sciece as possible and that doesn't devolve to cliche in the bottom 3rd. A better version of this movie was "Planet of the Apes" where Heston represents the evolving A.I., the apes humans and that movie didn't get a bum's rush ending.
> Watched the extended cut. Pretty standard tale of what happens when you build a self aware robot without the three laws.
T987654321
2023年4月18日 上午11:53:342023/4/18
收件者：
0 則新訊息