Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hannibal: Why so much confusion? (SPOILER)

1,297 views
Skip to first unread message

Jamie Eveleigh

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 4:21:29 PM2/11/01
to
SPOILER SPACE


I don't get it. Isn't it clear that he cuts off his own hand? Are people
complete morons? Clarice has two hands afterwards and he has a bandage when
on the plane. Do people now need subtitles in movies explaining what's
happening? Argh.


SDM

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 6:15:41 PM2/11/01
to

I got a poser for ya: Did he get the hand and have it reattached, or just
leave it behind? As a doctor, he should know that just because it's cut off
(or the thumb was, as another member here hypothesized) it isn't lost
forever.


Thomas Andrews

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 6:30:30 PM2/11/01
to
In article <t8e7gko...@corp.supernews.com>,

Where does a fugitive who has just cut off his hand/thumb/whatever go to get
it re-attached? These surgeries are fairly rare, and often take a
*very* long time. This story is gonna hit the news immediately. So who
is going to do the surgery? Lecter himself? That seems unlikely - this
surgery is hard enough with two hands and a team around you, but one hand
and performing it on yourself? The movies give Lecter a lot of stamina
and intellect, but this is stretching the bounds of logic.

Now, if he had cut off Starling's hand, then she could get it reattached.

Does anybody remember from the book why Lecter wasn't caught after he fed
Mason's face to the dogs? Did Mason just not remember who did it? Or
did he fall into a coma? I recall a little of the backstory of Lecter's
initial capture from "Red Dragon," and in that, they had no idea right
up until the detective had an "intuition."
--
Thomas Andrews tho...@best.com http://www.best.com/~thomaso/
"What's a man like me supposed to do,
With all this extra savoir-faire?" - TMBG

RPI

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 8:47:52 PM2/11/01
to
Jamie Eveleigh <dee...@optonline.net>:

Since he had the big butcher knife, he should've wacked the metal links in
the
cuffs, thus saving his hands. The current ending made him look 'softie,'
which
is so anti-Hannibal Lecter. Still, I really liked the movie and would
recommend
it.


Omen River

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 10:10:42 PM2/11/01
to

Thomas Andrews <tho...@best.com> wrote in message
news:qgFh6.13414$1%2.69...@sjc-read.news.verio.net...

> In article <t8e7gko...@corp.supernews.com>,
> SDM <smros...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> SPOILER SPACE
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't get it. Isn't it clear that he cuts off his own hand? Are
people
> >> complete morons? Clarice has two hands afterwards and he has a bandage
> >when
> >> on the plane. Do people now need subtitles in movies explaining what's
> >> happening? Argh.
> >
> > I got a poser for ya: Did he get the hand and have it reattached, or
just
> >leave it behind? As a doctor, he should know that just because it's cut
off
> >(or the thumb was, as another member here hypothesized) it isn't lost
> >forever.
> >
> >
>
> Where does a fugitive who has just cut off his hand/thumb/whatever go to
get
> it re-attached? These surgeries are fairly rare, and often take a
> *very* long time. This story is gonna hit the news immediately. So who
> is going to do the surgery? Lecter himself? That seems unlikely - this
> surgery is hard enough with two hands and a team around you, but one hand
> and performing it on yourself? The movies give Lecter a lot of stamina
> and intellect, but this is stretching the bounds of logic.
>
> Now, if he had cut off Starling's hand, then she could get it reattached.
>


I think the lack of blood on starling was confusing?

btw he was out of handcuffs with a ink pin but needed to cut something here
wasn't the saw in the kitchen


Omen River


ElBrendano

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 11:40:38 PM2/11/01
to
SPOILER

> I got a poser for ya: Did he get the hand and have it reattached, or just
>leave it behind? As a doctor, he should know that just because it's cut off
>(or the thumb was, as another member here hypothesized) it isn't lost
>forever.
>
>
>
>

Perhaps he cut it off and ate it.

Snotburger

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 11:58:07 PM2/11/01
to
> Since he had the big butcher knife, he should've wacked the metal links in
> the
> cuffs, thus saving his hands. The current ending made him look 'softie,'
> which
> is so anti-Hannibal Lecter. Still, I really liked the movie and would
> recommend
> it.


There's not a chance in hell that a butcher knife could slice through
handcuffs, but I think the main point of the scene was to show that
Hannibal still has some sort of weird respect and love for Clarice that
he was willing to cut off his own hand to escape rather than hers. Also,
Clarice is pretty much Hannibal's toy, so I'm guessing he didn't want to
harm her so that he can still have fun jacking with her head.

Revok

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 9:25:50 AM2/12/01
to

"Thomas Andrews" <tho...@best.com> wrote in message
news:qgFh6.13414$1%2.69...@sjc-read.news.verio.net...

I think in the book that Lecter cuts his face off and then breaks his neck -
this puts him in a coma. In Red Dragon they mention the victim on the
ventilator, but it was Will Graham's intuition that finally caught him.

gphon...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 9, 2020, 1:51:11 AM6/9/20
to
Could be he cut the cuff's links but used the sling to disguise the attached cuff as he had little time to make his escape. There was no blood on Clarice at final scene either.
0 new messages