Should I be going down another path? I'd love graphics but will accept
text if I have to. Perhaps I should cheat and install a Windows
interpreter in Virtualbox? But if I succeed under Linux I'll try and
package this stuff.
Les
I used Gargoyle to run Alabaster and it worked fine. You should find a
*.deb package here: http://ifiction.free.fr/index.php?id=iflinux
The site was down a bit, but then I found the .deb here:
http://ifiction.free.fr/fichiers/gargoyle_i386.deb
Thanks, it works great!
Eric: can this .deb not be uploaded to the list here:
http://code.google.com/p/garglk/downloads/list
Or perhaps you can collaborate with the people here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/301455
..to get this added to the repositories?
Les
>
> Eric: can this .deb not be uploaded to the list here:
> http://code.google.com/p/garglk/downloads/list
>
> Or perhaps you can collaborate with the people here:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/301455
>
> ..to get this added to the repositories?
ngh... I can be happy of having gargoyle in the 'buntu repositories, but
I think there will be a big unix name clash between 'terps; I suggest a
bit of renaming of the various gargoyle 'terps ( a garg prefix should be
enough), so people should continue to use the various standard textual
'terps if they want.
As I have reported in past, the not few issues with gargoyle I have, in
the end I came to a sort solution involving a kludge of path search
order, binary directories and a little batch script....
Best regards from Italy,
Dott. Piergiorgio.
The interpreters are all currently in /usr/lib/games/gargoyle, with
the executable /usr/games/gargoyle executing the right interpreter
depending on the extension of the file you are trying to interpret. So
it would seem that this problem has already been solved.
> The site was down a bit, but then I found the .deb here:
> http://ifiction.free.fr/fichiers/gargoyle_i386.deb
>
> Thanks, it works great!
Hello,
I'm happy it's working for you. I'll try to update it to the newest
gargoyle release. (should be out in 2 days)
> Eric: can this .deb not be uploaded to the list here:
> http://code.google.com/p/garglk/downloads/list
It's supposed to be a repository for the code. The windows code is
provided so people can get it more easily. The problem with linux is if
they begin to propose a .deb, they should provide the opensuse, fedora,
mandriva, archlinux versions as well...
But maybe they could give the links to the official or semi-official
versions so people would learn about the status of them.
>
> Or perhaps you can collaborate with the people here:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/301455
I don't have any knowledge with ubuntu packaging, I'm afraid. I'm only
creating a binary package for debian etch so many people should be able
to use it (on eeepc/xandros as well). My main distribution is Archlinux now.