Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Picasso's early master work...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Electric Nachos

unread,
Jul 31, 2004, 1:25:09 PM7/31/04
to
Mani asked for it and there's just too much for me to list here without
losing pc memory. Picasso *did* classical artwork as well as any other -
evidenced @ http://www.artchive.com/artchive/artists.html

Now WHAT reason under the sun would someone with this skill CHOOSE to
drastically stray from it??

Well it sure as hell ain't a *lack* of skill! Dude HAD it!


david

unread,
Aug 1, 2004, 5:26:18 AM8/1/04
to

Mani Deli

unread,
Aug 1, 2004, 1:05:55 PM8/1/04
to
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:25:09 -0700, "Electric Nachos"
<aint_...@chew.foo> wrote:

>Mani asked for it and there's just too much for me to list here without
>losing pc memory. Picasso *did* classical artwork as well as any other -
>evidenced @ http://www.artchive.com/artchive/artists.html

Chose a work from Harden's web site you think ranks with someone who
draws like a master.

>Now WHAT reason under the sun would someone with this skill CHOOSE to
>drastically stray from it??

You mean lack of skill. He didn't stray its the level he was always
at. And you never had anything to say about the Stein portrait. What's
great about it? Why should it hang in a museum?

>Well it sure as hell ain't a *lack* of skill! Dude HAD it!

Its a lack of skill accompanied by a large enema of hype..

No skill no art!

Tired of Modern Art? check http://www3.sympatico.ca/manideli/

Electric Nachos

unread,
Aug 1, 2004, 3:30:56 PM8/1/04
to

Mani Deli wrote in message ...

>Chose a work from Harden's web site you think ranks with someone who
>draws like a master.

Look fool - my computer can't handle that website - all those damn pop-ups
eat up every bit of memory I seem to have. GO LOOK AT HIS EARLY SELF
PORTRAITS

>>Now WHAT reason under the sun would someone with this skill CHOOSE to
>>drastically stray from it??
>
>You mean lack of skill.

I meant what the fuck I said.

>He didn't stray its the level he was always
>at. And you never had anything to say about the Stein portrait. What's
>great about it?

That particular painting is obviously a stepping stone toward the style he's
known for today. Is it great? No.

Should it be in a museum? Historically, yes. Aesthetically, no.

>Why should it hang in a museum?
>
>>Well it sure as hell ain't a *lack* of skill! Dude HAD it!
>
>Its a lack of skill accompanied by a large enema of hype..

You're just jealous. You can't ignore the facts to arrive at a conclusion
that exemplifies your failures!! That's just silly!

0 new messages