Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

MOMA is RIGHT?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

normn...@my-deja.com

unread,
Feb 9, 2001, 8:18:16 AM2/9/01
to
I don't know how many of you saw the end of the millenium show at
MOMA. It's pretty laughable, for example Bob Morris's felt is hung
next to the Beuys suit...One section is only "white" paintings (good
idea for the big MOMA white establishment) and so on.

One thing really works though: they group all the social/political art
(or pseudo social political ramblings some artists call art) into one
room that looks like some weird PC thrift shop. heh heh The
juxtapositioning this crap that was created over the 80's and 90's and
shows it for what it really is, a form of shallow one liners,
advertising, meaningless self-identity explorations and so on.
Together no particular one shines and the room makes the whole body of
work look severely outdated, a minor movement -- the same way we tend
to look back on Ben Shahn today as a pretty lame artist -- I think MOMA
hit the nail on it's PC head without even intending to. LOL


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

mdeli

unread,
Feb 10, 2001, 4:43:15 PM2/10/01
to
On Fri, 09 Feb 2001 13:18:16 GMT, normn...@my-deja.com wrote:

>I don't know how many of you saw the end of the millenium show at
>MOMA. It's pretty laughable, for example Bob Morris's felt is hung
>next to the Beuys suit...One section is only "white" paintings (good
>idea for the big MOMA white establishment) and so on.

snip

The idea behind the Modern Academic Art museum is to keep out the
majority of 20th century art which exhibits skill and craftsmanship.
The average Modern Academic Art Fundamentalist hasn't any idea of the
fine work produced by artists during the so called modern period.

The modern art magazines of the past show all those extinct artists
who were hot-shots for a brief period and are now the avant gone. The
interesting thing about them is that so many produced crap so similar
to the latest museum garbage.

The incompetent losers who produce the much same thing but never even
get a gallery show because they lack the personality and necessary
connections spend their lives wondering why they were overlooked.
After all their work isn't any worse. Just look at the miles of
abstract and no skill realistic drivel on the net and compare it to
the PR tauted garbage in museums or the latest art mag.

Experiment for an enthusiastic Artzy fartzy-
Get a de Kooning, erase the signature and sign your name to it and try
to get a show or sell it to a richy. See how far you get.
...no skill no art

Modern Academic Art is incompetence in search of an idea.

Tired of Modern Art? Check out my web page!

http://www.interlog.com/~hugod/

Peter H.M. Brooks

unread,
Feb 10, 2001, 5:23:30 PM2/10/01
to

mdeli <hug...@interlog.com> wrote in message
news:3a84d4de...@news.psi.ca...

>
> The incompetent losers who produce the much same thing but never even
> get a gallery show because they lack the personality and necessary
> connections spend their lives wondering why they were overlooked.
> After all their work isn't any worse. Just look at the miles of
> abstract and no skill realistic drivel on the net and compare it to
> the PR tauted garbage in museums or the latest art mag.
>
Yes, but, what about the competent, enthusiastic painters ( realistic
and otherwise) who are also put off by the dominance of bullshit?


--
A car that will not go is not a car at all. - Birkett
Karsales (Harrow) Lts. v. Wallis 1956

Andrew D

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 8:59:18 PM2/11/01
to
In article <3a84d4de...@news.psi.ca>, hug...@interlog.com (mdeli) wrote:

+On Fri, 09 Feb 2001 13:18:16 GMT, normn...@my-deja.com wrote:
[snip]
+The incompetent losers who produce the much same thing but never even
+get a gallery show because they lack the personality and necessary
+connections spend their lives wondering why they were overlooked.
+After all their work isn't any worse.

Perhaps that's the problem.

Andy D.

"I'm a great speller - but a hopless tpyist!"

RBrac53660

unread,
Feb 14, 2001, 1:02:44 AM2/14/01
to
>Yes, but, what about the competent, enthusiastic painters ( realistic
>and otherwise) who are also put off by the dominance of bullshit?

Ahhh s++t I'm actually in one of those late 80's 90's museums. But I can still
I never made a living. Because they are full of shit and it ahh fuck I dunna
know my point

Guerdis

unread,
Feb 14, 2001, 5:21:09 AM2/14/01
to

> Tired of Modern Art? Check out my web page!

Be tired of something else for a change!

Hutto


Litsurgery

unread,
Feb 25, 2001, 9:33:49 PM2/25/01
to
"Accept your place in the art world"
Rothko

mdeli

unread,
Aug 2, 2001, 12:14:51 AM8/2/01
to
The idea behind the Modern Academic Art museum is to keep out the
majority of 20th century art which exhibits skill and craftsmanship.
The average Modern Academic Art Fundamentalist really hasn't any idea

of the fine work produced by artists during the so called modern
period.

The modern art magazines of the past show all those extinct artists
who were hot-shots for a brief period and are now the avant gone. The
interesting thing about them is that so many produced crap so similar
to the latest museum garbage.

The incompetent losers who produce the much same thing but never even


get a gallery show because they lack the personality and necessary

connections spend their lives wondering why they were overlooked.

After all their work isn't any worse. Just look at the miles of
abstract and no skill realistic drivel on the net and compare it to
the PR tauted garbage in museums or the latest art mag.

Experiment for an enthusiastic Artzy fartzy-


Get a de Kooning, erase the signature and sign your name to it and try
to get a show or sell it to a richy. See how far you get.
...no skill no art

Modern Academic Art is incompetence in search of an idea.

Tired of Modern Art? Check out my web page!

http://www.interlog.com/~hugod/

0 new messages