How are you defining the term "abstract"? If you mean based on a real
object, but less detailed, then the people living ca. 25,000 BCE beat
everyone! If you mean non-representational, then who really was the first?
--
Joshua Heuman
yu10...@yorku.ca
Art History Undergraduate
: How are you defining the term "abstract"? If you mean based on a real
: object, but less detailed, then the people living ca. 25,000 BCE beat
: everyone! If you mean non-representational, then who really was the first?
They were also the first postmodern instalation artists!
--
brenda is )\._.,--....,'``.
br...@sparc.isl.net /, _.. \ _\ (`.
`._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Interesting, Ron. What was the date?
Vance
<Searches through deepest reaches of a dusty memory>
It would have to be 1911 or earlier -- isn't 1910 - 1913 or so the
period when Mondriaan was getting started?
: Interesting, Ron. What was the date?
: Vance
Having problems posting... Anyway, as someone mentioned, "The First Step"
1909. Two excellent sources on Kupka are: "Frank Kupka" by Ludmila Vachtova
& "Kupka" Guggenheim catalog 1975. Both are very hard to find though. The
Rizzoli book that was mentioned might still be around but is very limited.
Ron
I have read that Whistler's "The Falling Rocket" was considered to be the first abstract painting, and in fact precipitated the firs=
t court case over the worth or non-worth of a work of art after Ruskin's criticism of the piece. I think that was in the 1880s.
And what about Celtic art? It was almost all abstract and we can assume they painted. Definitely predate Kupka.