i tend to dislike the rigid systems i read about for colour mixing. yawn.
by directed play and experimentation it is possible to learn very quickly
what works. it is important to realise that colours in a tube are not the
same as the primary colours in light itself.
melynda claire reid
melynda reid who wears hats but does not type caps
eel: mel...@titipu.resun.com or nosc.mil!titipu.resun.com!melynda
snail: p o box 378 greensboro, florida 32330
I have found a book regarding watercolors and the pigments used for the
different brands and colors. The author discussed the pigments
typically used in the color and then referenced every different brand of that
particular color to it's original pigment. I found it very useful in helping
me find colors and brands for my new palette. The analysis also includes
overall ratings and results from lightfastness tests. The book is called The
Wilcox Guide to Watercolor Paints. I found it in the library, but I have seen
it in your better bookstores for $24.95.
-Kevin
> Many companies like Holbein and Winsor & Newton don't like you to know the
> pigments but you can usually find out.
> regards, -Frank in Delaware-
Absolute rubbish. I've had extensive discussions about the chemical
compositions and permanence of pigments with the head chemist at ColArt
(windsor and newton). All I did was just call ColArt on the phone, they
were very responsive. They had many good suggestions and dumped a TON of
technical data sheets on me.
Maybe it helped that I know a little chemistry.. that got the guy
interested.
-------------------
Charles Eicher
cei...@halcyon.com
-------------------
>In article <Ze2om1f....@delphi.com>, fran...@delphi.com wrote:
snip snip snip
>>
>(windsor and newton). All I did was just call ColArt on the phone, they
>were very responsive. They had many good suggestions and dumped a TON of
>technical data sheets on me.
>Maybe it helped that I know a little chemistry.. that got the guy
>interested.
>-------------------
> Charles Eicher
>cei...@halcyon.com
OA>-------------------
I agree with your observations about the availability of paint mixture data.
You don't even have to evince the slightest interest in chemistry. My local
art shop has a rack of technical data sheets from W&N there for the taking.
I mean, why would they hide their formulas? Artists have been mixing paint
for centuries; it's no big secret. What the companies offer is that they
can often do a better job at making the paint smooth and consistent.
-ellie
>
> Surely the issue is the quality of the preparation and not the brand name.
> Some of the Cotman colours are fine--they use reliable pigments and the
> properties of the paint are acceptable (e.g. ultramarine, yellow ochre,
> ivory black, etc.). Others such as the cadmium "hues" and the viridian are
> poor.
>
true, perhaps, but I find Cotman uses a poor quality binder (pure gum
arabic being scarce these days) and isn't ground very finely. Pigment
durability is an issue, only up to a point.. Often I find durable colors
that I can't use due to other factors.. again, I'm using them in a
photochemical process so this may not be a general concern.
> On the other hand, I threw out many of my Holbein colours after reading the
> results of Wilcox's testing--particularly and paradoxically most of the
> ones with "permanent" in the colour name.
>
geez.. throw them out to me.. I'll pay shipping. I'm especially fond of the
holbein blacks and whites (about 7 different blacks in gouache and
watercolor) but permanence is usually not a problem there.. and I'd KILL
for a few tubes of Holbein Copper or Gold (discontinued, dammit!) but these
aren't permanent colors.. I think Holbein grinds their pigments more
finely than any other brand I've used and I can use less to get the
coverage I want.. But to each their own...
> Don't buy the cheapo W&N Cotman colors if you want serious colors. Get
> their swatch sheet (which lists the real names) if you're stuck on chemical
> names.
> Besides, if you were really serious, you wouldn't buy ANY W&N products,
> you'd be buying Holbein or LeFranc & Bourgeous (sp?) colors.
> -------------------
> Charles Eicher
> cei...@halcyon.com
> -------------------
Surely the issue is the quality of the preparation and not the brand name.
Some of the Cotman colours are fine--they use reliable pigments and the
properties of the paint are acceptable (e.g. ultramarine, yellow ochre,
ivory black, etc.). Others such as the cadmium "hues" and the viridian are
poor.
On the other hand, I threw out many of my Holbein colours after reading the
results of Wilcox's testing--particularly and paradoxically most of the
ones with "permanent" in the colour name.
Dan. Stewart