Rory is dead
John Pertwee
--
As a Christian, I have nothing but praise for Sister-in-Christ Patsy Ramsey. She was a
lovely woman who seldom killed her children.
The Doctor
Whatever.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.facebook.com/dyadallee
In him with nothing but insults resides no wisdom. -unknown
Ignis Fatuus
<johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Deal with it.
Does that mean the Wedding's off?
AlfyDoor
"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
news:52b406la0vefc0flb...@4ax.com...
I don't have a problem with killing off Rory (though it does seem a bit out
of place with the season's rather light tone). But is it all just going to
be 're-set' at the end?
pbo...@aol.com
wrote:
I haven't noticed a particularly light tone to most of this year's
stories, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if there's a global reset
at the end of the year. Admittedly partly that's due to hoping the new
Daleks will vanish never to return, but it seems a little odd that
Moffatt came up with nothing better than "because we'd changed
everything else" as a justification for changing the Daleks - almost
as though he doesn't want to give the real reason for changing them
away just yet (such as a hint that this universe may not be all it
seems).
Phil
Ignis Fatuus
Or a merchandising deal with Fisher-Price.
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 04:23:45 -0700 (PDT), "pbow...@aol.com"
Sadly I suspect that's more likely, but I can still hope.
Phil
The Doctor
The Doctor
Cracks are happening in time and Silence will fall.
Stephen O'Connell
news:7ch306pspv3l0u46p...@4ax.com...
> Deal with it.
>
Glady.
However, I suspect that we will see Rory again at some stage...
The Doctor
Coast...@cshor.com
Probably in whatever universe this week's story was taking place, there
will be no wedding.
I'm sure that like a bad penny, Rory will be back. Either stepping out of
the shower in the last episode or waking up beside Suzanne Pleshette!
Hulahoop
Who?
Regards
Ged
John Pertwee
wrote:
Dunno. Why did I even post this?
--
·.·´¨ ¨)) -:¦:-
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
John Pertwee
((¸¸.·´ ..·´
-:¦:- ((¸¸
·.·
John Pertwee
I hope that Doctor Who can return to the days that dead meant dead
forever.
--
Rome wasn't built in a day.
Mind you, it only took a day to burn.
Coast...@cshor.com
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 13:16:59 GMT, "Hulahoop" <sween...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"John Pertwee" <johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:7ch306pspv3l0u46p...@4ax.com...
> >> Deal with it.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> As a Christian, I have nothing but praise for Sister-in-Christ Patsy
> >> Ramsey. She was a
> >> lovely woman who seldom killed her children.
> >
> >
> >Who?
>
> Dunno. Why did I even post this?
Patricia Ann "Patsy" Ramsey (n�e Paugh; December 29, 1956 � June 24, 2006),
was the mother of JonBen�t Ramsey, a 6-year-old American beauty pageant
contestant who was murdered on December 25, 1996.
John Pertwee
>John Pertwee <johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 May 2010 13:16:59 GMT, "Hulahoop" <sween...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"John Pertwee" <johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >news:7ch306pspv3l0u46p...@4ax.com...
>> >> Deal with it.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> As a Christian, I have nothing but praise for Sister-in-Christ Patsy
>> >> Ramsey. She was a
>> >> lovely woman who seldom killed her children.
>> >
>> >
>> >Who?
>>
>> Dunno. Why did I even post this?
>
>Patricia Ann "Patsy" Ramsey (née Paugh; December 29, 1956 — June 24, 2006),
>was the mother of JonBenét Ramsey, a 6-year-old American beauty pageant
>contestant who was murdered on December 25, 1996.
(:
The Doctor
The Doctor
The Doctor
pbo...@aol.com
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 11:45:20 +0100, "AlfyDoor"
>
>
> >"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
> >news:52b406la0vefc0flb...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
> >> <johnpertweea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>Deal with it.
>
> >> Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>
> >I don't have a problem with killing off Rory (though it does seem a bit out
> >of place with the season's rather light tone). But is it all just going to
> >be 're-set' at the end?
>
> I hope that Doctor Who can return to the days that dead meant dead
> forever.
Yes, Tenth Planet ruined everything. :-(
Rory's already come back from the dead once, so why not again?
Phil
John Pertwee
LOL
>Rory's already come back from the dead once, so why not again?
IMHO, the only real way to bring him back would be if they were still
under control of The Dream Lord. Anything else would be cheap.
john smith
<pbo...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e9dc0a3e-75dc-4b67...@g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On 30 May, 11:45, "AlfyDoor" <AlfyD...@SPAMPANTSblueyonder.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> "Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:52b406la0vefc0flb...@4ax.com...
>>
>> > On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
>> > <johnpertweea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>Deal with it.
>>
>> > Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>>
>> I don't have a problem with killing off Rory (though it does seem a bit
>> out
>> of place with the season's rather light tone). But is it all just going
>> to
>> be 're-set' at the end?
>
> I haven't noticed a particularly light tone to most of this year's
> stories, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if there's a global reset
Global? More like Multiversal! Maybe Moffatt's trying to top RTD in his
"end of all reality" style finale?
john smith
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:httn6p$3pu$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <5lrMn.4640$QF7.1081@hurricane>,
> AlfyDoor <Alfy...@SPAMPANTSblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
>>news:52b406la0vefc0flb...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
>>> <johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Deal with it.
>>>
>>> Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>>>
>>
>>I don't have a problem with killing off Rory (though it does seem a bit
>>out
>>of place with the season's rather light tone). But is it all just going to
>>be 're-set' at the end?
>>
>
> Cracks are happening in time and Silence will fall.
We *know*, you stupid twat. We're all watching the SAME programme - and
we're weeks AHEAD of you - so fuck off with your mundane statements of the
obvious...
john smith
<Coast...@CShor.com> wrote in message
news:20100530093923.317$d...@newsreader.com...
Served the obnoxious little brat right!
john smith
<Coast...@CShor.com> wrote in message
news:20100530091335.356$u...@newsreader.com...
> Ignis Fatuus <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
>> <johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Deal with it.
>>
>> Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>
> Probably in whatever universe this week's story was taking place, there
> will be no wedding.
>
It's like the 'flash-sideways' of "Lost" never went away...
john smith
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 07:05:45 -0700 (PDT), "pbo...@aol.com"
> <pbo...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On 30 May, 14:39, John Pertwee <johnpertweea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 30 May 2010 11:45:20 +0100, "AlfyDoor"
>>>
>>> <AlfyD...@SPAMPANTSblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> >"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
>>> >news:52b406la0vefc0flb...@4ax.com...
>>> >> On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
>>> >> <johnpertweea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>Deal with it.
>>>
>>> >> Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>>>
>>> >I don't have a problem with killing off Rory (though it does seem a bit
>>> >out
>>> >of place with the season's rather light tone). But is it all just going
>>> >to
>>> >be 're-set' at the end?
>>>
>>> I hope that Doctor Who can return to the days that dead meant dead
>>> forever.
>>
>>Yes, Tenth Planet ruined everything. :-(
>
> LOL
>
>>Rory's already come back from the dead once, so why not again?
>
> IMHO, the only real way to bring him back would be if they were still
> under control of The Dream Lord. Anything else would be cheap.
> --
ANYTHING else would be >>better<< than THAT - *again*
AlfyDoor
> In article <20100530091335.356$u...@newsreader.com>,
> <Coast...@CShor.com> wrote:
>>Ignis Fatuus <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
>>> <johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Deal with it.
>>>
>>> Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>>
>>Probably in whatever universe this week's story was taking place, there
>>will be no wedding.
>>
>>I'm sure that like a bad penny, Rory will be back. Either stepping out of
>>the shower in the last episode or waking up beside Suzanne Pleshette!
>
> Ever tried prolog?
> --
A general purpose logic programming language associated with artificial
intelligence and computational linguistics? No I haven't. What does it have
to do with any of this?
AlfyDoor
> <pbo...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On 30 May, 14:39, John Pertwee <johnpertweea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 30 May 2010 11:45:20 +0100, "AlfyDoor"
>>>
>>> <AlfyD...@SPAMPANTSblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> >"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
>>> >news:52b406la0vefc0flb...@4ax.com...
>>> >> On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
>>> >> <johnpertweea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>Deal with it.
>>>
>>> >> Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>>>
>>> >I don't have a problem with killing off Rory (though it does seem a bit
>>> >out
>>> >of place with the season's rather light tone). But is it all just going
>>> >to
>>> >be 're-set' at the end?
>>>
>>> I hope that Doctor Who can return to the days that dead meant dead
>>> forever.
>>
>>Yes, Tenth Planet ruined everything. :-(
>
> LOL
>
>>Rory's already come back from the dead once, so why not again?
This is where I have sympathy for Karen Gillan. She's now had to act/react
to Rory's death twice and make it a little different and still convincing
both times. Not easy.
>
> IMHO, the only real way to bring him back would be if they were still
> under control of The Dream Lord. Anything else would be cheap.
> --
I heard a whisper before this episode that Rory would be killed and the only
way to 'save' him would be to throw him into the crack (for whatever
reason), and that the Doc and Amy would spend the rest of the season trying
to find him. Not quite accurate, but much as good as anything else this
season's come up with...
John Pertwee
<the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:httn6p$3pu$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <5lrMn.4640$QF7.1081@hurricane>,
>> AlfyDoor <Alfy...@SPAMPANTSblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
>>>news:52b406la0vefc0flb...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
>>>> <johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Deal with it.
>>>>
>>>> Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>>>>
>>>
>>>I don't have a problem with killing off Rory (though it does seem a bit
>>>out
>>>of place with the season's rather light tone). But is it all just going to
>>>be 're-set' at the end?
>>>
>>
>> Cracks are happening in time and Silence will fall.
>
>
>We *know*, you stupid twat. We're all watching the SAME programme - and
>we're weeks AHEAD of you - so fuck off with your mundane statements of the
>obvious...
You people STILL reply to Yads? I thought you all would have him
killfiled by now...
--
John Pertwee
What do any of his posts have to do with Doctor Who?
The Doctor
john smith <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:httn6p$3pu$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <5lrMn.4640$QF7.1081@hurricane>,
>> AlfyDoor <Alfy...@SPAMPANTSblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
>>>news:52b406la0vefc0flb...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
>>>> <johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Deal with it.
>>>>
>>>> Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>>>>
>>>
>>>I don't have a problem with killing off Rory (though it does seem a bit
>>>out
>>>of place with the season's rather light tone). But is it all just going to
>>>be 're-set' at the end?
>>>
>>
>> Cracks are happening in time and Silence will fall.
>
>
>We *know*, you stupid twat. We're all watching the SAME programme - and
>
>
>
>> --
>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
>> doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>> God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
>> rising!
>> http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.facebook.com/dyadallee
>> In him with nothing but insults resides no wisdom. -unknown
>>
>
>
said troll john smith who can't put 2 and 2 together.
The Doctor
TRolls consciousless troll john smith.
The Doctor
Try progamming Silence will Fall in prolog.
The Doctor
The Doctor
john smith
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 18:22:57 +0100, "john smith"
> <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:httn6p$3pu$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <5lrMn.4640$QF7.1081@hurricane>,
>>> AlfyDoor <Alfy...@SPAMPANTSblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:52b406la0vefc0flb...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:55:42 -0500, John Pertwee
>>>>> <johnper...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Deal with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that mean the Wedding's off?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't have a problem with killing off Rory (though it does seem a bit
>>>>out
>>>>of place with the season's rather light tone). But is it all just going
>>>>to
>>>>be 're-set' at the end?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Cracks are happening in time and Silence will fall.
>>
>>
>>We *know*, you stupid twat. We're all watching the SAME programme - and
>>we're weeks AHEAD of you - so fuck off with your mundane statements of the
>>obvious...
>
> You people STILL reply to Yads? I thought you all would have him
> killfiled by now...
>
>
It's just me - I'm in an indulgent mood this week - but the problem has been
rectified.
Please accept my apologies for replying to such vermin as Yads!
The Doctor
troll john smith went braindead again.
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <kfyMn.28972$9J1.19143@hurricane>,
> AlfyDoor <Alfy...@SPAMPANTSblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >news:httqst$abg$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> In article <20100530091335.356$u...@newsreader.com>,
> >> <Coast...@CShor.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I'm sure that like a bad penny, Rory will be back. Either stepping out of
> >>>the shower in the last episode or waking up beside Suzanne Pleshette!
> >>
> >> Ever tried prolog?
> >> --
> >
> >A general purpose logic programming language associated with artificial
> >intelligence and computational linguistics? No I haven't. What does it have
> >to do with any of this?
> >
>
> Try progamming Silence will Fall in prolog.
Try explaining what that means in plain English first.
The Doctor
I did.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.facebook.com/dyadallee
Since 1 June 1995
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <9e475e49-cb20-4c8a...@e28g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>,
> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <kfyMn.28972$9J1.19143@hurricane>,
> >> AlfyDoor <Alfy...@SPAMPANTSblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >> >news:httqst$abg$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> >> In article <20100530091335.356$u...@newsreader.com>,
> >> >> <Coast...@CShor.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>I'm sure that like a bad penny, Rory will be back. Either stepping out of
> >> >>>the shower in the last episode or waking up beside Suzanne Pleshette!
> >> >>
> >> >> Ever tried prolog?
> >> >> --
> >> >
> >> >A general purpose logic programming language associated with artificial
> >> >intelligence and computational linguistics? No I haven't. What does it have
> >> >to do with any of this?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Try progamming Silence will Fall in prolog.
> >
> >Try explaining what that means in plain English first.
>
> I did.
When?
The Doctor
solar penguin
And you can try explaining THAT in plain English too.
Stephen O'Connell
>
> And you can try explaining THAT in plain English too.
This is RADW, we don't do plain English here! :-)
--
Classic literature on audio:
http://www.textbookstuff.com/
The Doctor
John Pertwee
<the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> You people STILL reply to Yads? I thought you all would have him
>> killfiled by now...
>>
>>
>
>
>It's just me - I'm in an indulgent mood this week - but the problem has been
>rectified.
>
>Please accept my apologies for replying to such vermin as Yads!
Replying to Yads is a bit like sex. We've all done it. Some of us were
respectable, but some of us were sluts. (:
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <hu1fv9$lhp$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Stephen O'Connell <no....@fk.u.com> wrote:
> >"solar penguin" <solar....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>
> >> And you can try explaining THAT in plain English too.
> >
> >This is RADW, we don't do plain English here! :-)
> >
>
> Gallifreyan anyone?
Okay then, please explain it in plain Gallifreyan.