Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

New Doctor Hailed as the best

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Hulahoop

unread,
Oct 30, 2009, 7:37:04 AM10/30/09
to
See link http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8333466.stm for
details

Not too modest then

Regards

Ged

�G�l�k Z.L.F Buday AKA The Black Jester�, AKA etc....�

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 2:17:17 AM11/6/09
to
X-Body
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:37:04 -0700 (PDT), in rec.arts.drwho Hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote:

�See link http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8333466.stm for

That dude looks like Kirk from OZ. Is he flying around looking trade blow jobs for favors.

Aren't they sueing Tennant over the NBC thing? It takes an ass to weazle out of contract, very unprofessional.
After the last Top Gear line where he describes it as a dream job will screw him in court as well, testified against himself.
Prosecuting: Jerremy Clarkson.


I think if a writing with a typist option (re-continuity) and a return to doing it in North Shore Studios in Vancouver I'd
do it. Since I am not a fan boy, a writer-humorist (freelance), know the pathology, and grew up paying dues am getting
off my illness (TEN) and this would neve kill a career past health problems delayed me from in the first place.
My City would need it since the Olympics have a tendency to hurt the industry. I was thinking of hitting the acting thing
again anyway. The pride I swallow even saying that I would do it is making me ill again.

I am also a colorful eccentric libertarian anyway, not hard. But I couldn't get other people in the 8ths's as a manager, so no way
I'd get me in it.

Best.

GZLFB; The Black Jester
http://www.blackjester.com/
http://w3.itemshop.org/

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 10:11:17 AM11/6/09
to
In article <4af3caa2...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net>,

Nice to see you again Voltrollian.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
For the latest World News go to http://www.cuttingedge.org/ - Lest we forget 2009 .

AlanSailsbury

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 10:24:33 AM11/6/09
to
On Oct 30, 7:37 am, Hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> See linkhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8333466.stmfor

> details
>
> Not too modest then
>
> Regards
>
> Ged

Ah that's only hype. It's what producers do. He knows young Smith is
going to be a hard sell to some stick in the muds so he's trying a
sales technique. You start a rumour that it's the "best yet" and
people repeat it. Pretty soon the public believe it. Psychology.

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 10:47:54 AM11/6/09
to
In article <1468fa61-8556-43eb...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
AlanSailsbury <alansa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

TRollsbury trolls again.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 2:17:16 PM11/6/09
to
On Nov 6, 8:47 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <1468fa61-8556-43eb-9ae0-9c26665d8...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,

>
>
>
>
>
> AlanSailsbury  <alansailsb...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >On Oct 30, 7:37=A0am, Hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> See linkhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8333466.stmfor
> >> details
>
> >> Not too modest then
>
> >> Regards
>
> >> Ged
>
> >Ah that's only hype. It's what producers do. He knows young Smith is
> >going to be a hard sell to some stick in the muds so he's trying a
> >sales technique. You start a rumour that it's the "best yet" and
> >people repeat it. Pretty soon the public believe it. Psychology.
>
> TRollsbury trolls again.
> --


What was trolling about that post !!?

It was ON TOPIC. It was INTELLIGENT.

Oh...my bad...I forgot that you don't do "on topic" or "intelligent".

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 5:14:25 PM11/6/09
to
In article <611f626b-9ee1-420b...@w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Mr.Smartypants <bc...@canada.com> wrote:
>On Nov 6, 8:47=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <1468fa61-8556-43eb-9ae0-9c26665d8...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> AlanSailsbury =A0<alansailsb...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>> >On Oct 30, 7:37=3DA0am, Hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> See linkhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8333466.stmfor
>> >> details
>>
>> >> Not too modest then
>>
>> >> Regards
>>
>> >> Ged
>>
>> >Ah that's only hype. It's what producers do. He knows young Smith is
>> >going to be a hard sell to some stick in the muds so he's trying a
>> >sales technique. You start a rumour that it's the "best yet" and
>> >people repeat it. Pretty soon the public believe it. Psychology.
>>
>> TRollsbury trolls again.
>> --
>
>
>What was trolling about that post !!?
>
>It was ON TOPIC. It was INTELLIGENT.
>
>Oh...my bad...I forgot that you don't do "on topic" or "intelligent".

Said SS Stormtrooper troll MSP .

AlanSailsbury

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 6:47:18 PM11/6/09
to
On Oct 30, 11:37 am, Hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> See linkhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8333466.stmfor
> details
>
> Not too modest then
>
> Regards
>
> Ged

Having read it again, Steve is merely using the phrase "simply the
best" in the same way someone would say "simply brilliant" or
"excellent". It doesn't actually mean he thinks Smith is BETTER than
the previous Doctors.

Hulahoop

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 6:53:15 PM11/6/09
to

Well you would back track like that wouldn't you Stephen/Russell/
Gareth/Whoever :-)

Regards

Ged

AlanZarbury

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 6:59:55 PM11/6/09
to

Sometimes I wish a member of the production team WOULD post here just to
clarify the errors and assumptions but they're far too busy.

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 7:48:39 PM11/6/09
to
In article <461b821d-5e6e-4ea4...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
AlanSailsbury <alansa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

We wait and see.

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 7:49:02 PM11/6/09
to
In article <45f3f5bc-f714-4491...@y28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 7, 10:47=A0am, AlanSailsbury <alansailsb...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>> On Oct 30, 11:37=A0am, Hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > See linkhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8333466.stmfor
>> > details
>>
>> > Not too modest then
>>
>> > Regards
>>
>> > Ged
>>
>> Having read it again, Steve is merely using the phrase "simply the
>> best" in the same way someone would say "simply brilliant" or
>> "excellent". It doesn't actually mean he thinks Smith is BETTER than
>> the previous Doctors.
>
>Well you would back track like that wouldn't you Stephen/Russell/
>Gareth/Whoever :-)
>
>Regards
>
>Ged

Kate Orman?

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 7:49:44 PM11/6/09
to
In article <ZpqdnQznGPeuJWnX...@bt.com>,

Zarbitroll mutates.

Peter J Ross

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 9:47:58 PM11/6/09
to
In rec.arts.drwho on Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:24:33 -0800 (PST),
AlanSailsbury <alansa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

It could backfire. Tennant is the most beloved Doctor since Tom, and
Tennant fans might take more kindly to Smith if his introduction were
less hyped.

Personally, I'm expecting the 2010 series to be mostly crap, but
that's OK, because every series of Doctor Who from 1978 onwards has
been mostly crap. But the Tennant/Tate partenership was easily the
best Doctor/companion partnership since Tom/Romana 2, and it will be a
difficult double act to follow.

--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 8:44:13 AM11/7/09
to
In article <slrnhf9nu...@pjr.gotdns.org>,

Hey!! As long as Religious groups are not offended we should be all right.

�G�l�k Z.L.F Buday AKA The Black Jester�, AKA etc....�

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 9:04:55 AM11/11/09
to
X-Body

On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:24:33 -0800 (PST), in rec.arts.drwho AlanSailsbury <alansa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Oh no, this is the mark of a sick gambler.


Best

GZLFB(.com)

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 8:43:41 AM11/11/09
to
In article <4afac461...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net>,

�G�l�k Z.L.F Buday AKA The Black Jester�, AKA etc....� <antihy...@SeAL.NAVY.buggeredbyNSA-NSC.int.nwo.gov> wrote:

Sick and deluded.

�G�l�k Z.L.F Buday AKA The Black Jester�, AKA etc....�

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 9:06:53 AM11/11/09
to
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:47:58 +0000, in rec.arts.drwho Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

�In rec.arts.drwho on Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:24:33 -0800 (PST),


�AlanSailsbury <alansa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

�> On Oct 30, 7:37 am, Hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
�>> See linkhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8333466.stmfor
�>> details
�>>
�>> Not too modest then
�>>
�>> Regards
�>>
�>> Ged
�>
�> Ah that's only hype. It's what producers do. He knows young Smith is
�> going to be a hard sell to some stick in the muds so he's trying a
�> sales technique. You start a rumour that it's the "best yet" and
�> people repeat it. Pretty soon the public believe it. Psychology.

�It could backfire. Tennant is the most beloved Doctor since Tom, and
�Tennant fans might take more kindly to Smith if his introduction were
�less hyped.

�Personally, I'm expecting the 2010 series to be mostly crap, but
�that's OK, because every series of Doctor Who from 1978 onwards has
�been mostly crap. But the Tennant/Tate partenership was easily the
�best Doctor/companion partnership since Tom/Romana 2, and it will be a
�difficult double act to follow.


James May right.

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 8:45:53 AM11/11/09
to
In article <4afac4e9...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net>,

�G�l�k Z.L.F Buday AKA The Black Jester�, AKA etc....� <antihy...@SeAL.NAVY.buggeredbyNSA-NSC.int.nwo.gov> wrote:

I hope DW is enjoyable as ever. Just a mater of putting back soul into it.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 2:40:37 PM11/12/09
to
On Nov 7, 6:44 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <slrnhf9nuu.f71....@pjr.gotdns.org>,

> Peter J Ross  <peadar.ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >In rec.arts.drwho on Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:24:33 -0800 (PST),


well it seems *everything* offends your particular religious group or
whatever the hell you belong to.

AlanZarbury

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 4:25:32 PM11/12/09
to

I find religion offensive. :-D

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 5:21:02 PM11/12/09
to
In article <7f3ccb9b-c4ad-4cc6...@y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Mr.Smartypants <bc...@canada.com> wrote:

>On Nov 7, 6:44=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <slrnhf9nuu.f71....@pjr.gotdns.org>,
>> Peter J Ross =A0<peadar.ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >In rec.arts.drwho on Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:24:33 -0800 (PST),
>> >AlanSailsbury <alansailsb...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >> On Oct 30, 7:37=A0am, Hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> See linkhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8333466.stmfor
>> >>> details
>>
>> >>> Not too modest then
>>
>> >>> Regards
>>
>> >>> Ged
>>
>> >> Ah that's only hype. It's what producers do. He knows young Smith is
>> >> going to be a hard sell to some stick in the muds so he's trying a
>> >> sales technique. You start a rumour that it's the "best yet" and
>> >> people repeat it. Pretty soon the public believe it. Psychology.
>>
>> >It could backfire. Tennant is the most beloved Doctor since Tom, and
>> >Tennant fans might take more kindly to Smith if his introduction were
>> >less hyped.
>>
>> >Personally, I'm expecting the 2010 series to be mostly crap, but
>> >that's OK, because every series of Doctor Who from 1978 onwards has
>> >been mostly crap. But the Tennant/Tate partenership was easily the
>> >best Doctor/companion partnership since Tom/Romana 2, and it will be a
>> >difficult double act to follow.
>>
>> >--
>> >PJR :-)
>> >slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1:http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
>> >extra slrn documentation:http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
>> >newsgroup name validator:http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
>>
>> Hey!! =A0As long as Religious groups are not offended we should be all ri=

>ght.
>> --
>
>
>well it seems *everything* offends your particular religious group or
>whatever the hell you belong to.


Said the person who wants te extermination of Semites.


--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630

Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 5:22:16 PM11/12/09
to
In article <7pCdnWneKo-V4GHX...@bt.com>,

You are an offense to common sense Zarbitroll.


--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630

"The Great One"

unread,
Nov 13, 2009, 12:06:35 AM11/13/09
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message news:hdi1qo$jud$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

> In article <7pCdnWneKo-V4GHX...@bt.com>,
> AlanZarbury <aza...@yahoo.cachoo> wrote:
> >Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >> On Nov 7, 6:44 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> >
> >>> Hey!! As long as Religious groups are not offended we should be all right.
> >>> --
> >>
> >>
> >> well it seems *everything* offends your particular religious group or
> >> whatever the hell you belong to.
> >
> >I find religion offensive. :-D
> >
>
> You are an offense to common sense Zarbitroll.
> --
> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

Yes...Yes...
--
John C.

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 13, 2009, 10:45:06 AM11/13/09
to
In article <WfadnTDjNeADdGHX...@centurytel.net>,
\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message =

>news:hdi1qo$jud$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <7pCdnWneKo-V4GHX...@bt.com>,
>> AlanZarbury <aza...@yahoo.cachoo> wrote:
>> >Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>> >> On Nov 7, 6:44 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> >
>> >>> Hey!! As long as Religious groups are not offended we should be =
>all right.
>> >>> --
>> >>=20
>> >>=20
>> >> well it seems *everything* offends your particular religious group =

>or
>> >> whatever the hell you belong to.
>> >
>> >I find religion offensive. :-D
>> >
>>=20

>> You are an offense to common sense Zarbitroll.
>> --=20
>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici =

>doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>
>Yes...Yes...
>--
>John C.

10/10 !


--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Nov 13, 2009, 12:31:34 PM11/13/09
to
On Nov 13, 8:45 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <WfadnTDjNeADdGHXnZ2dnUVZ_rSdn...@centurytel.net>,

> \"The Great One\" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message =
> >news:hdi1qo$jud$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> In article <7pCdnWneKo-V4GHXnZ2dnUVZ8iRi4...@bt.com>,

> >> AlanZarbury  <aza...@yahoo.cachoo> wrote:
> >> >Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >> >> On Nov 7, 6:44 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>
> >> >>> Hey!!  As long as Religious groups are not offended we should be =
> >all right.
> >> >>> --
> >> >>=20
> >> >>=20
> >> >> well it seems *everything* offends your particular religious group =
> >or
> >> >> whatever the hell you belong to.
>
> >> >I find religion offensive. :-D
>
> >>=20
> >> You are an offense to common sense Zarbitroll.
> >> --=20
> >> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici =
> >doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>
> >Yes...Yes...
> >--
> >John C.
>
> 10/10 !
> --


Having any luck getting Ms. Spears booted off Twitter?

The Doctor

unread,
Nov 13, 2009, 7:40:12 PM11/13/09
to
In article <c1ae411d-22bf-453f...@y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Mr.Smartypants <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On Nov 13, 8:45=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <WfadnTDjNeADdGHXnZ2dnUVZ_rSdn...@centurytel.net>,
>> \"The Great One\" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message =3D

>> >news:hdi1qo$jud$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> In article <7pCdnWneKo-V4GHXnZ2dnUVZ8iRi4...@bt.com>,
>> >> AlanZarbury =A0<aza...@yahoo.cachoo> wrote:
>> >> >Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>> >> >> On Nov 7, 6:44 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>> >> >>> Hey!! =A0As long as Religious groups are not offended we should be=
> =3D
>> >all right.
>> >> >>> --
>> >> >>=3D20
>> >> >>=3D20

>> >> >> well it seems *everything* offends your particular religious group =
>=3D

>> >or
>> >> >> whatever the hell you belong to.
>>
>> >> >I find religion offensive. :-D
>>
>> >>=3D20

>> >> You are an offense to common sense Zarbitroll.
>> >> --=3D20
>> >> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici =3D

>> >doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>>
>> >Yes...Yes...
>> >--
>> >John C.
>>
>> 10/10 !
>> --
>
>
>Having any luck getting Ms. Spears booted off Twitter?
>

Just her fake boot. The reall one needs rehab like you.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Nov 14, 2009, 12:53:58 PM11/14/09
to
On Nov 13, 5:40 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <c1ae411d-22bf-453f-a782-561199a16...@y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,


Did you apologize to Kylie yet?

Ooops......my bad..........I forgot......you don't do apologies

0 new messages