Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Doctor Timeline: Fugitive of Judoon
92 views
Skip to first unread message
Timothy Bruening
Jan 30, 2020, 9:42:26 AM1/30/20
to
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
This episode says that there was at least one female incarnation BEFORE the Hartnell Doctor, yet the child Doctor was a boy. I speculate that at some point, the boy Doctor regenerated into a woman, either Ruth or another woman. Later, the Doctor regenerated into Hartnell, but a massive forget field make the Doctor forget everything between childhood and Hartnell, and also made all Gallifreyans forget the truth about the Timeless Child!
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
This episode says that there was at least one female incarnation BEFORE the Hartnell Doctor, yet the child Doctor was a boy. I speculate that at some point, the boy Doctor regenerated into a woman, either Ruth or another woman. Later, the Doctor regenerated into Hartnell, but a massive forget field make the Doctor forget everything between childhood and Hartnell, and also made all Gallifreyans forget the truth about the Timeless Child!
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 10:16:52 AM1/30/20
to
Tim typed:
>This episode says that there was at least one female incarnation BEFORE the Hartnell Doctor, yet the child Doctor was a boy. I speculate that at some point, the boy Doctor regenerated into a woman, either Ruth or another woman. Later, the Doctor regenerated into Hartnell, but a massive forget field make the Doctor forget everything between childhood and Hartnell, and also made all Gallifreyans forget the truth about the Timeless Child!
I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
Tim Bruening
Jan 30, 2020, 11:21:24 AM1/30/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 11:28:33 AM1/30/20
to
Tim typed:
>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
>
>Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell incarnations
There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this really is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
>
>Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell incarnations
Timothy Bruening
Jan 30, 2020, 11:38:13 AM1/30/20
to
Why would neither one remember the other?
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 12:06:45 PM1/30/20
to
Tim typed:
Etc...
>Why would neither one remember the other?
Memory wiped. Timelines corrupt. Alternate universe. One of them only think she's the Doctor. One of them's pretending to be the Doctor. One's a clone.
Etc...
Tim Bruening
Jan 30, 2020, 12:35:13 PM1/30/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 12:43:14 PM1/30/20
to
Tim typed:
>I was proposing a forget field to wipe memories.
You were "proposing" lots of things, Tim. You'll find out sooner or later.
Mike M
Jan 30, 2020, 12:52:40 PM1/30/20
to
was credited at the end of the episode. He’s also categorically denied that
this is a Doctor from a parallel universe. That leaves, I think, four valid
possibilities, three of which require a memory wipe:
A Doctor from an alternative timeline. This needs the least reworking of
the mythos: every Doctor after the first could be different in such a
timeline.
A pre Hartnell Doctor (the previous cycle of regenerations, as per the
Cartmel masterplan’s “Other” but without the name change).
A Doctor between Troughton and Pertwee, a sort of extension of the old
“season 6b” theory. Note: this need NOT violate the regeneration limit -
the Time Lords sentenced the Second Doctor to “a change of appearance”, not
a regeneration. So if either the change to the Jo Doctor or the change to
Pertwee was “a change of appearance” rather than a regeneration, only one
would be used.
A future Doctor. Personally I’d think this was the most fun option, and
it’s probably the simplest for a modern audience to understand, but then
I’m not Chris Chibnall.
--
This space intentionally left blank
Timothy Bruening
Jan 30, 2020, 1:38:54 PM1/30/20
to
Wouldn't a gender change be more than just a change of appearance?
%
Jan 30, 2020, 1:47:52 PM1/30/20
to
On 2020-01-30 11:38 a.m., Timothy Bruening wrote:
> Wouldn't a gender change be more than just a change of appearance?
>
no
> Wouldn't a gender change be more than just a change of appearance?
>
Mike M
Jan 30, 2020, 1:58:32 PM1/30/20
to
Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wouldn't a gender change be more than just a change of appearance?
>
You’re assuming that Time Lords see things the same way as humans and that
> Wouldn't a gender change be more than just a change of appearance?
>
the words translated as “appearance” and “gender” mean the same things in
Gallifreyan as they do in English.
Timothy Bruening
Jan 30, 2020, 2:51:05 PM1/30/20
to
Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a gender change? BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any female appearances at end of War Games.
Timothy Bruening
Jan 30, 2020, 4:33:24 PM1/30/20
to
On Thursday, January 30, 2020 at 9:52:40 AM UTC-8, Mike M wrote:
> <stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tim typed:
> >>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
> >>
> >> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell incarnations
> >
> > There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this really
> > is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
> >
>
> Chibnall has said that this is “definitively” the Doctor. That’s how she
> was credited at the end of the episode. He’s also categorically denied that
> this is a Doctor from a parallel universe. That leaves, I think, four valid
> possibilities, three of which require a memory wipe:
>
> A Doctor from an alternative timeline. This needs the least reworking of
> the mythos: every Doctor after the first could be different in such a
> timeline.
How did Doctor Ruth crossover to our timeline?
> <stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tim typed:
> >>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
> >>
> >> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell incarnations
> >
> > There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this really
> > is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
> >
>
> Chibnall has said that this is “definitively” the Doctor. That’s how she
> was credited at the end of the episode. He’s also categorically denied that
> this is a Doctor from a parallel universe. That leaves, I think, four valid
> possibilities, three of which require a memory wipe:
>
> A Doctor from an alternative timeline. This needs the least reworking of
> the mythos: every Doctor after the first could be different in such a
> timeline.
>
> A pre Hartnell Doctor (the previous cycle of regenerations, as per the
> Cartmel masterplan’s “Other” but without the name change).
>
> A Doctor between Troughton and Pertwee, a sort of extension of the old
> “season 6b” theory. Note: this need NOT violate the regeneration limit -
> the Time Lords sentenced the Second Doctor to “a change of appearance”, not
> a regeneration. So if either the change to the Jo Doctor or the change to
> Pertwee was “a change of appearance” rather than a regeneration, only one
> would be used.
>
> A future Doctor. Personally I’d think this was the most fun option, and
> it’s probably the simplest for a modern audience to understand, but then
> I’m not Chris Chibnall.
Try this: Reveal that the Tennant to Tennant regeneration at the start of Journey's End WASN'T a regeneration after all!
> A pre Hartnell Doctor (the previous cycle of regenerations, as per the
> Cartmel masterplan’s “Other” but without the name change).
>
> A Doctor between Troughton and Pertwee, a sort of extension of the old
> “season 6b” theory. Note: this need NOT violate the regeneration limit -
> the Time Lords sentenced the Second Doctor to “a change of appearance”, not
> a regeneration. So if either the change to the Jo Doctor or the change to
> Pertwee was “a change of appearance” rather than a regeneration, only one
> would be used.
>
> A future Doctor. Personally I’d think this was the most fun option, and
> it’s probably the simplest for a modern audience to understand, but then
> I’m not Chris Chibnall.
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 4:50:01 PM1/30/20
to
Tim typed:
>Try this: Reveal that the Tennant to Tennant regeneration at the start of Journey's End WASN'T a regeneration after all!
Why? And it was.
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:15:42 PM1/30/20
to
In article <8b73cbbe-51cf-4af6...@googlegroups.com>,
That is heresy!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Birthdate 29 Jan 1969 Redhill , Surrey, England.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Birthdate 29 Jan 1969 Redhill , Surrey, England.
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:17:37 PM1/30/20
to
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:18:12 PM1/30/20
to
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:18:42 PM1/30/20
to
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:19:01 PM1/30/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 5:19:25 PM1/30/20
to
Yads yapped:
>Heresy!!
You've got a strange religion.
>Heresy!!
You've got a strange religion.
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:19:38 PM1/30/20
to
In article <dcd12f52-1347-416f...@googlegroups.com>,
Chibnall has ruled out the parallel universe theory earlier this week.
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:19:57 PM1/30/20
to
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:21:18 PM1/30/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 5:23:59 PM1/30/20
to
Yads yapped:
>2 of the unholy trinity of radw thus communed.
You're an idiot, Yads.
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:25:29 PM1/30/20
to
In article <r0v555$1gdp$1...@gioia.aioe.org>, Mike M <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
><stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Tim typed:
>>>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
>>>
>>> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell incarnations
>>
>> There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this really
>> is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
>>
>
>Chibnall has said that this is “definitively” the Doctor. That’s how she
>was credited at the end of the episode. He’s also categorically denied that
>this is a Doctor from a parallel universe. That leaves, I think, four valid
>possibilities, three of which require a memory wipe:
>
>A Doctor from an alternative timeline. This needs the least reworking of
>the mythos: every Doctor after the first could be different in such a
>timeline.
>
Big time revisinism!
><stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Tim typed:
>>>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
>>>
>>> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell incarnations
>>
>> There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this really
>> is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
>>
>
>Chibnall has said that this is “definitively” the Doctor. That’s how she
>was credited at the end of the episode. He’s also categorically denied that
>this is a Doctor from a parallel universe. That leaves, I think, four valid
>possibilities, three of which require a memory wipe:
>
>A Doctor from an alternative timeline. This needs the least reworking of
>the mythos: every Doctor after the first could be different in such a
>timeline.
>
>A pre Hartnell Doctor (the previous cycle of regenerations, as per the
>Cartmel masterplan’s “Other” but without the name change).
>
>A Doctor between Troughton and Pertwee, a sort of extension of the old
>“season 6b” theory. Note: this need NOT violate the regeneration limit -
>the Time Lords sentenced the Second Doctor to “a change of appearance”, not
>a regeneration. So if either the change to the Jo Doctor or the change to
>Pertwee was “a change of appearance” rather than a regeneration, only one
>would be used.
>
>A future Doctor. Personally I’d think this was the most fun option, and
>it’s probably the simplest for a modern audience to understand, but then
>I’m not Chris Chibnall.
>
>--
>This space intentionally left blank
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:25:55 PM1/30/20
to
In article <d44ef123-a0d7-4e74...@googlegroups.com>,
Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Wouldn't a gender change be more than just a change of appearance?
Exactly why this heresy has gone too far!
>Wouldn't a gender change be more than just a change of appearance?
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:26:10 PM1/30/20
to
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:26:52 PM1/30/20
to
In article <r0v90k$3rg$1...@gioia.aioe.org>, Mike M <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wouldn't a gender change be more than just a change of appearance?
>>
>
>You’re assuming that Time Lords see things the same way as humans and that
>the words translated as “appearance” and “gender” mean the same
>things in
>Gallifreyan as they do in English.
Hence why Chibnall is in danger of a point of return that cost him darely.
>Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wouldn't a gender change be more than just a change of appearance?
>>
>
>You’re assuming that Time Lords see things the same way as humans and that
>the words translated as “appearance” and “gender” mean the same
>things in
>Gallifreyan as they do in English.
>
>--
>This space intentionally left blank
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:27:10 PM1/30/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 5:29:45 PM1/30/20
to
Yads yapped:
>Good point!
No it's not. You're an idiot, Yads.
>Good point!
No it's not. You're an idiot, Yads.
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:29:54 PM1/30/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 5:34:20 PM1/30/20
to
Yads yapped:
>And ??!!
And you're an idiot.
>And ??!!
And you're an idiot.
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:34:22 PM1/30/20
to
In article <d6c14cef-4f22-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
Well SW, you deny Jesus Christ, just like Idlehands for
Proverbs 16:27 Living Bible (TLB)
27 Idle hands are the devil's workshop; idle lips are his mouthpiece.
Living Bible (TLB)
Proverbs 16:27 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
27
An ungodly man diggeth up evil:
and in his lips there is as a burning fire.
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
KJV reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press,
the Crown's patentee in the UK.
Proverbs 16:27 Living Bible (TLB)
27 Idle hands are the devil's workshop; idle lips are his mouthpiece.
Living Bible (TLB)
Proverbs 16:27 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
27
An ungodly man diggeth up evil:
and in his lips there is as a burning fire.
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
KJV reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press,
the Crown's patentee in the UK.
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:36:09 PM1/30/20
to
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:37:56 PM1/30/20
to
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 5:38:48 PM1/30/20
to
Tim Bruening
Jan 30, 2020, 5:54:03 PM1/30/20
to
Tim Bruening
Jan 30, 2020, 6:01:06 PM1/30/20
to
On Thursday, January 30, 2020 at 2:19:01 PM UTC-8, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <e94f683f-bec4-4f65...@googlegroups.com>,
> Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Why would neither one remember the other?
>
> Something sick happened.
Injection of Recon into the Doctor?
> In article <e94f683f-bec4-4f65...@googlegroups.com>,
> Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Why would neither one remember the other?
>
> Something sick happened.
The Gallifreyans exterminating a native species?
Idlehands
Jan 30, 2020, 7:55:24 PM1/30/20
to
On 2020-01-30 3:21 p.m., The Doctor wrote:
SPAM
--
“The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.
An evil soul producing holy witness
Is like a villain with a smiling cheek,
A goodly apple rotten at the heart.
O, what a goodly outside falsehood hath!”
William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice
SPAM
--
“The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.
An evil soul producing holy witness
Is like a villain with a smiling cheek,
A goodly apple rotten at the heart.
O, what a goodly outside falsehood hath!”
William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice
Idlehands
Jan 30, 2020, 7:55:50 PM1/30/20
to
Idlehands
Jan 30, 2020, 7:56:57 PM1/30/20
to
Idlehands
Jan 30, 2020, 7:57:58 PM1/30/20
to
On 2020-01-30 3:34 p.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <d6c14cef-4f22-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
> <stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yads yapped:
>>> Heresy!!
>>
>> You've got a strange religion.
>
> Well SW, you deny Jesus Christ, just like Idlehands for
>
>
> Proverbs 16:27 Living Bible (TLB)
> 27 Idle hands are the devil's workshop; idle lips are his mouthpiece.
> Living Bible (TLB)
>
> Proverbs 16:27 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
> 27
> An ungodly man diggeth up evil:
> and in his lips there is as a burning fire.
> Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
> KJV reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press,
> the Crown's patentee in the UK.
>
Please post the link where I denied Jesus Christ you lying hell bound idiot.
> In article <d6c14cef-4f22-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
> <stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yads yapped:
>>> Heresy!!
>>
>> You've got a strange religion.
>
> Well SW, you deny Jesus Christ, just like Idlehands for
>
>
> Proverbs 16:27 Living Bible (TLB)
> 27 Idle hands are the devil's workshop; idle lips are his mouthpiece.
> Living Bible (TLB)
>
> Proverbs 16:27 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
> 27
> An ungodly man diggeth up evil:
> and in his lips there is as a burning fire.
> Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
> KJV reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press,
> the Crown's patentee in the UK.
>
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 9:25:00 PM1/30/20
to
The Doctor
Jan 30, 2020, 9:25:22 PM1/30/20
to
tony...@gmail.com
Jan 30, 2020, 11:40:35 PM1/30/20
to
On Friday, January 31, 2020 at 1:42:26 AM UTC+11, Timothy Bruening wrote:
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
>
> This episode says that there was at least one female incarnation BEFORE the Hartnell Doctor, yet the child Doctor was a boy. I speculate that at some point, the boy Doctor regenerated into a woman, either Ruth or another woman. Later, the Doctor regenerated into Hartnell, but a massive forget field make the Doctor forget everything between childhood and Hartnell, and also made all Gallifreyans forget the truth about the Timeless Child!
My thoughts: Time has been altered way way back in the past, prior to the Doctor, probably by The Master. The current Doctor is a remnant of the old timeline, and that's why time is coming for her. She's basically Michael J Fox in Back to the Future. If she doesn't go back and fix the timeline, she will fade from existence and the new Doctor will become the correct Doctor.
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
> 5
>
> This episode says that there was at least one female incarnation BEFORE the Hartnell Doctor, yet the child Doctor was a boy. I speculate that at some point, the boy Doctor regenerated into a woman, either Ruth or another woman. Later, the Doctor regenerated into Hartnell, but a massive forget field make the Doctor forget everything between childhood and Hartnell, and also made all Gallifreyans forget the truth about the Timeless Child!
My thoughts: Time has been altered way way back in the past, prior to the Doctor, probably by The Master. The current Doctor is a remnant of the old timeline, and that's why time is coming for her. She's basically Michael J Fox in Back to the Future. If she doesn't go back and fix the timeline, she will fade from existence and the new Doctor will become the correct Doctor.
Timothy Bruening
Jan 31, 2020, 1:58:51 AM1/31/20
to
M
M
M
B
N
B
V
C xx
C
X
Z
Z
L
L
L
L
K
I
J
H
G
A new way for Aggy to fix what he thinks is the Jodie Error: Change the timeline to cause Capaldi to regenerate as a MAN!
M
M
B
N
B
V
C xx
C
X
Z
Z
L
L
L
L
K
I
J
H
G
A new way for Aggy to fix what he thinks is the Jodie Error: Change the timeline to cause Capaldi to regenerate as a MAN!
Tim Bruening
Jan 31, 2020, 2:12:03 AM1/31/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 31, 2020, 6:05:46 AM1/31/20
to
Tim typed:
>Aggy can use above to unhappen Jodie and restore a male Doctor.
No he can't, Tim.
Timothy Bruening
Jan 31, 2020, 6:14:51 AM1/31/20
to
How does a parallel universe differ from an alternate timeline?
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 31, 2020, 6:34:06 AM1/31/20
to
Tim typed:
>How does a parallel universe differ from an alternate timeline?
The timeline continues in the parallel universe. The timeline reverts in an alternate timeline.
The Doctor
Jan 31, 2020, 11:00:53 AM1/31/20
to
In article <0bd8bbff-a959-4d3e...@googlegroups.com>,
The Evil Chibnall is not capable of that crime!
The Doctor
Jan 31, 2020, 11:08:31 AM1/31/20
to
In article <78c4f50c-4241-4adf...@googlegroups.com>,
We are awaiting the real 13th Doctor to make an appearance!
The Doctor
Jan 31, 2020, 11:13:36 AM1/31/20
to
The Doctor
Jan 31, 2020, 11:30:57 AM1/31/20
to
In article <5f6834cb-f489-49d6...@googlegroups.com>,
2 of the unholy trinity of radw thus communed!
Chris hibnall is a dead man walking!
Chris hibnall is a dead man walking!
The Doctor
Jan 31, 2020, 11:33:42 AM1/31/20
to
In article <daad0d31-f4d7-45a4...@googlegroups.com>,
Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>How does a parallel universe differ from an alternate timeline?
Alternate timeling takes place in this universe.
>How does a parallel universe differ from an alternate timeline?
The Doctor
Jan 31, 2020, 11:34:19 AM1/31/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Jan 31, 2020, 11:43:18 AM1/31/20
to
Yads yapped:
>2 of the unholy trinity of radwthus communed.
The Doctor
Jan 31, 2020, 12:13:37 PM1/31/20
to
In article <49503061-b1d2-4473...@googlegroups.com>,
Said Stephen Wilson , the anti-christ of rec.arts.drwho !
Idlehands
Jan 31, 2020, 9:34:01 PM1/31/20
to
On 2020-01-31 9:30 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
SPAM
SPAM
Daniel60
Feb 4, 2020, 3:36:05 AM2/4/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com wrote on 31/01/2020 3:28 AM:
> Tim typed:
>>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
>>
>> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell
>> incarnations
>
> There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this
> really is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
>
I'm betting it is because the Producers/Directors/Writers had never
considered that there might have been The Doctor incarnation prior to
DocHartnell before this!
Or, if they had thought about it, the idea had been thrown out at that time!
--
Daniel
> Tim typed:
>>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
>>
>> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell
>> incarnations
>
> There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this
> really is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
>
I'm betting it is because the Producers/Directors/Writers had never
considered that there might have been The Doctor incarnation prior to
DocHartnell before this!
Or, if they had thought about it, the idea had been thrown out at that time!
--
Daniel
Daniel60
Feb 4, 2020, 3:37:11 AM2/4/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com wrote on 31/01/2020 4:43 AM:
> Tim typed:
>> I was proposing a forget field to wipe memories.
>
> You were "proposing" lots of things, Tim. You'll find out sooner or later.
>
... or he/we will never find out!!
--
Daniel
> Tim typed:
>> I was proposing a forget field to wipe memories.
>
> You were "proposing" lots of things, Tim. You'll find out sooner or later.
>
... or he/we will never find out!!
--
Daniel
The Doctor
Feb 4, 2020, 11:00:41 AM2/4/20
to
In article <r1badi$v0d$1...@dont-email.me>,
And still should be.
>--
>Daniel
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
A problem is a chance for you to do your best. -Duke Ellington
>--
>Daniel
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
The Doctor
Feb 4, 2020, 11:01:01 AM2/4/20
to
Daniel60
Feb 6, 2020, 2:51:39 AM2/6/20
to
The Doctor wrote on 31/01/2020 9:19 AM:
> In article <e94f683f-bec4-4f65...@googlegroups.com>,
--
Daniel
> In article <e94f683f-bec4-4f65...@googlegroups.com>,
> Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why would neither one remember the other?
>
> Something sick happened.
>
Gee Whiz, That's a real great explanation of what's going on there, idiot!!
>> Why would neither one remember the other?
>
> Something sick happened.
>
--
Daniel
Daniel60
Feb 6, 2020, 3:06:47 AM2/6/20
to
Timothy Bruening wrote on 31/01/2020 6:51 AM:
> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a gender change?
> BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any female appearances at end
> of War Games.
>
Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender change??
--
Daniel
> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a gender change?
> BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any female appearances at end
> of War Games.
>
Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender change??
--
Daniel
The Doctor
Feb 6, 2020, 8:01:01 AM2/6/20
to
In article <r1ggi8$n9m$2...@dont-email.me>,
Very sick!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Sometimes it is the greediest giving things away. -unknown
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
The Doctor
Feb 6, 2020, 8:01:24 AM2/6/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Feb 6, 2020, 8:15:54 AM2/6/20
to
Yads yapped:
No he might not. It's a stupid question that nobody will ever ask him. Idiot.
>>Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender change??
>
>Chibnall might answer that.
>
No he might not. It's a stupid question that nobody will ever ask him. Idiot.
The Doctor
Feb 6, 2020, 8:23:28 AM2/6/20
to
In article <cde6f3d3-9deb-4350...@googlegroups.com>,
Chibnall forced Whittaker on the fan base
and now getting the poor reputation he deserves!
and now getting the poor reputation he deserves!
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Feb 6, 2020, 8:32:17 AM2/6/20
to
Yads yapped:
>Chibnall forced Whittaker on the fan base
and now getting the poor reputation he deserves!
Most people think Whittaker was a great choice.
and now getting the poor reputation he deserves!
Idlehands
Feb 6, 2020, 8:47:15 AM2/6/20
to
On 2020-02-06 6:23 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <cde6f3d3-9deb-4350...@googlegroups.com>,
> <stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yads yapped:
>>>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender change??
>>>
>>> Chibnall might answer that.
>>
>> No he might not. It's a stupid question that nobody will ever ask him. Idiot.
>
> Chibnall forced Whittaker on the fan base
> and now getting the poor reputation he deserves!
>
Nobody forces you to watch the show idiot, but then what would you have
> In article <cde6f3d3-9deb-4350...@googlegroups.com>,
> <stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yads yapped:
>>>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender change??
>>>
>>> Chibnall might answer that.
>>
>> No he might not. It's a stupid question that nobody will ever ask him. Idiot.
>
> Chibnall forced Whittaker on the fan base
> and now getting the poor reputation he deserves!
>
to whine about. Typical incel behaviour.
Timothy Bruening
Feb 6, 2020, 6:58:24 PM2/6/20
to
On Thursday, January 30, 2020 at 9:52:40 AM UTC-8, Mike M wrote:
> was credited at the end of the episode. He’s also categorically denied that
> this is a Doctor from a parallel universe. That leaves, I think, four valid
> possibilities, three of which require a memory wipe:
>
>
> A Doctor between Troughton and Pertwee, a sort of extension of the old
> “season 6b” theory. Note: this need NOT violate the regeneration limit -
> the Time Lords sentenced the Second Doctor to “a change of appearance”, not
> a regeneration. So if either the change to the Jo Doctor or the change to
> Pertwee was “a change of appearance” rather than a regeneration, only one
> would be used.
Why would the Time Lords force the 2nd Doctor to become a woman?
> <stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tim typed:
> >>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
> >>
> >> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell incarnations
> >
> > There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this really
> > is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
> >
>
> Chibnall has said that this is “definitively” the Doctor. That’s how she
> > Tim typed:
> >>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
> >>
> >> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell incarnations
> >
> > There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this really
> > is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
> >
>
> was credited at the end of the episode. He’s also categorically denied that
> this is a Doctor from a parallel universe. That leaves, I think, four valid
> possibilities, three of which require a memory wipe:
>
>
> A Doctor between Troughton and Pertwee, a sort of extension of the old
> “season 6b” theory. Note: this need NOT violate the regeneration limit -
> the Time Lords sentenced the Second Doctor to “a change of appearance”, not
> a regeneration. So if either the change to the Jo Doctor or the change to
> Pertwee was “a change of appearance” rather than a regeneration, only one
> would be used.
Why would the Time Lords force the 2nd Doctor to become a woman?
Idlehands
Feb 6, 2020, 8:11:22 PM2/6/20
to
On 2020-02-06 6:38 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
SPAM
SPAM
Tim Bruening
Feb 6, 2020, 9:05:43 PM2/6/20
to
1
q
w
2
3
4
5
y
6
7
u
,
k
i
8
9
oo
l
.
/
;
p
0
Did Lee Clayton fight in a Gallifreyan war?
q
w
2
3
4
5
y
6
7
u
,
k
i
8
9
oo
l
.
/
;
p
0
Did Lee Clayton fight in a Gallifreyan war?
The Doctor
Feb 7, 2020, 12:38:59 AM2/7/20
to
The Doctor
Feb 7, 2020, 12:41:46 AM2/7/20
to
Daniel60
Feb 7, 2020, 7:56:17 AM2/7/20
to
The Doctor wrote on 7/02/2020 12:01 AM:
> In article <r1ghek$qh0$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 31/01/2020 6:51 AM:
>>> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a gender change?
>>> BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any female appearances at end
>>> of War Games.
>>>
>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender change??
>
> Chibnall might answer that.
> In article <r1ghek$qh0$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 31/01/2020 6:51 AM:
>>> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a gender change?
>>> BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any female appearances at end
>>> of War Games.
>>>
>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender change??
>
>
Why, idiot?? Is Chibnall now writing lore for what has already passed,
idiot?
--
Daniel
The Doctor
Feb 7, 2020, 11:15:41 AM2/7/20
to
Daniel60
Feb 8, 2020, 5:08:40 AM2/8/20
to
The Doctor wrote on 8/02/2020 3:15 AM:
> In article <r1jmpe$rvb$3...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 7/02/2020 12:01 AM:
>>> In article <r1ghek$qh0$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 31/01/2020 6:51 AM:
>>>>> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a gender change?
>>>>> BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any female appearances at end
>>>>> of War Games.
>>>>>
>>>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender change??
>>>
>>> Chibnall might answer that.
>>>
>> Why, idiot?? Is Chibnall now writing lore for what has already passed,
>> idiot?
>
> In article <r1jmpe$rvb$3...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 7/02/2020 12:01 AM:
>>> In article <r1ghek$qh0$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 31/01/2020 6:51 AM:
>>>>> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a gender change?
>>>>> BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any female appearances at end
>>>>> of War Games.
>>>>>
>>>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender change??
>>>
>>> Chibnall might answer that.
>>>
>> Why, idiot?? Is Chibnall now writing lore for what has already passed,
>> idiot?
>
> Chibnall i the source of this abomination!!
>
Which "abomination" *i* that, idiot??
>
--
Daniel
Daniel60
Feb 8, 2020, 5:17:19 AM2/8/20
to
The Doctor wrote on 5/02/2020 3:00 AM:
> In article <r1badi$v0d$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> stephen.w...@gmail.com wrote on 31/01/2020 3:28 AM:
>>> Tim typed:
>>>>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell
>>>> incarnations
>>>
>>> There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this
>>> really is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
>>>
>> I'm betting it is because the Producers/Directors/Writers had never
>> considered that there might have been The Doctor incarnation prior to
>> DocHartnell before this!
>>
>> Or, if they had thought about it, the idea had been thrown out at that time!
>
> And still should be.
Too late, idiot!! Now part of Doctor Who Canon!
> In article <r1badi$v0d$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> stephen.w...@gmail.com wrote on 31/01/2020 3:28 AM:
>>> Tim typed:
>>>>> I speculate that your speculation is incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> Then why would the Doctor not remember any pre-Hartnell
>>>> incarnations
>>>
>>> There are dozens of reasons. And it's still not certain that this
>>> really is a pre-Hartnell incarnation.
>>>
>> I'm betting it is because the Producers/Directors/Writers had never
>> considered that there might have been The Doctor incarnation prior to
>> DocHartnell before this!
>>
>> Or, if they had thought about it, the idea had been thrown out at that time!
>
> And still should be.
--
Daniel
The Doctor
Feb 8, 2020, 10:29:06 AM2/8/20
to
In article <r1m1b5$5s4$5...@dont-email.me>,
>>
>Which "abomination" *is* that, idiot??
>
>--
>Daniel
Faux Doctors and revised of a pre-Hartnell Time Line!
Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 8/02/2020 3:15 AM:
>> In article <r1jmpe$rvb$3...@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 7/02/2020 12:01 AM:
>>>> In article <r1ghek$qh0$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 31/01/2020 6:51 AM:
>>>>>> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a gender change?
>>>>>> BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any female appearances at end
>>>>>> of War Games.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender
>change??
>>>>
>>>> Chibnall might answer that.
>>>>
>>> Why, idiot?? Is Chibnall now writing lore for what has already passed,
>>> idiot?
>>
>> Chibnall is the source of this abomination!!
>The Doctor wrote on 8/02/2020 3:15 AM:
>> In article <r1jmpe$rvb$3...@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 7/02/2020 12:01 AM:
>>>> In article <r1ghek$qh0$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 31/01/2020 6:51 AM:
>>>>>> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a gender change?
>>>>>> BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any female appearances at end
>>>>>> of War Games.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo a gender
>change??
>>>>
>>>> Chibnall might answer that.
>>>>
>>> Why, idiot?? Is Chibnall now writing lore for what has already passed,
>>> idiot?
>>
>>
>Which "abomination" *is* that, idiot??
>
>--
>Daniel
Faux Doctors and revised of a pre-Hartnell Time Line!
The Doctor
Feb 8, 2020, 10:29:38 AM2/8/20
to
In article <r1m1rc$b4n$1...@dont-email.me>,
You mean revised Faux Who!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Feb 8, 2020, 10:32:15 AM2/8/20
to
Yads yapped:
>Faux Doctors and revised of a pre-Hartnell Time Line!
Gibberish.
Idlehands
Feb 8, 2020, 11:18:51 AM2/8/20
to
On 2020-02-08 8:53 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
Stupid SPAM
Stupid SPAM
Daniel60
Feb 9, 2020, 4:29:24 AM2/9/20
to
The Doctor wrote on 9/02/2020 2:29 AM:
> In article <r1m1b5$5s4$5...@dont-email.me>, Daniel60
> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 8/02/2020 3:15 AM:
>>> In article <r1jmpe$rvb$3...@dont-email.me>, Daniel60
>>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 7/02/2020 12:01 AM:
>>>>> In article <r1ghek$qh0$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel60
>>>>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 31/01/2020 6:51 AM:
>>>>>>> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a
>>>>>>> gender change? BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any
>>>>>>> female appearances at end of War Games.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo
>>>>>> a gender change??
>>>>>
>>>>> Chibnall might answer that.
>>>>>
>>>> Why, idiot?? Is Chibnall now writing lore for what has already
>>>> passed, idiot?
>>>
>>> Chibnall is the source of this abomination!!
>>>
>> Which "abomination" *is* that, idiot??
>
> In article <r1m1b5$5s4$5...@dont-email.me>, Daniel60
> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 8/02/2020 3:15 AM:
>>> In article <r1jmpe$rvb$3...@dont-email.me>, Daniel60
>>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 7/02/2020 12:01 AM:
>>>>> In article <r1ghek$qh0$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel60
>>>>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 31/01/2020 6:51 AM:
>>>>>>> Why would the Time Lords force the Doctor to undergo a
>>>>>>> gender change? BTW, the Second Doctor wasn't offered any
>>>>>>> female appearances at end of War Games.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tim, when did The Time Lords *force* The Doctor to undergo
>>>>>> a gender change??
>>>>>
>>>>> Chibnall might answer that.
>>>>>
>>>> Why, idiot?? Is Chibnall now writing lore for what has already
>>>> passed, idiot?
>>>
>>> Chibnall is the source of this abomination!!
>>>
>> Which "abomination" *is* that, idiot??
>
> Faux Doctors and revised of a pre-Hartnell Time Line!
>
How do *YOU* , idiot, know this is a "revised of a pre-Hartnell Time
>
Line", idiot??
For all you (or we) know, this could have been Doctor Who Canon Lore
since 1963!!
--
Daniel
Daniel60
Feb 9, 2020, 4:33:00 AM2/9/20
to
The Doctor wrote on 31/01/2020 9:34 AM:
> In article <d6c14cef-4f22-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
> <stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yads yapped:
>>> Heresy!!
>>
>> You've got a strange religion.
>
> Well SW, you deny Jesus Christ, just like Idlehands for
>
> Proverbs 16:27 Living Bible (TLB)
> 27 Idle hands are the devil's workshop; idle lips are his mouthpiece.
> Living Bible (TLB)
Hey, idiot, what does the 'T' stand for in "Living Bible (TLB)", idiot??
--
Daniel
> In article <d6c14cef-4f22-48a3...@googlegroups.com>,
> <stephen.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yads yapped:
>>> Heresy!!
>>
>> You've got a strange religion.
>
> Well SW, you deny Jesus Christ, just like Idlehands for
>
> Proverbs 16:27 Living Bible (TLB)
> 27 Idle hands are the devil's workshop; idle lips are his mouthpiece.
> Living Bible (TLB)
Hey, idiot, what does the 'T' stand for in "Living Bible (TLB)", idiot??
--
Daniel
The Doctor
Feb 9, 2020, 8:35:34 AM2/9/20
to
In article <r1ojdh$kbj$1...@dont-email.me>,
Chibnall will risk contradicting, T3D, T3D, Day of the Doctor , etc...
>
>--
>Daniel
>
>--
>Daniel
The Doctor
Feb 9, 2020, 8:36:22 AM2/9/20
to
Timothy Bruening
Feb 9, 2020, 9:16:30 AM2/9/20
to
The Doctor
Feb 9, 2020, 9:29:54 AM2/9/20
to
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Feb 9, 2020, 9:45:34 AM2/9/20
to
Tim typed:
>If so, wouldn't we have seen or at least heard of pre-Hartnell Doctors long ago?
We already have, Tim. Some of them were shown in Brain of Morbius.
The Doctor
Feb 9, 2020, 9:50:03 AM2/9/20
to
In article <bbab0b2f-37a2-42c3...@googlegroups.com>,
Lie Wilson. Those non-Doctor faces are the faces of Morbius!
solar penguin
Feb 9, 2020, 12:57:51 PM2/9/20
to
The Idiot insisted...
> The T satns for The !
Why can’t The ! satn for itself?
> The T satns for The !
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Feb 9, 2020, 1:02:15 PM2/9/20
to
Yads yapped:
According to Philip Hinchcliffe on the DVD of An Evening with Philip Hinchcliffe, the original intention of the faces were to represent previous incarnations of the Doctor.
He went on to say that no matter how many Who fans say these are "mind battle faces" or "past incarnations of Morbius" doesn't matter, followed by him stating the fact that he played the Doctor.
>Lie Wilson. Those non-Doctor faces are the faces of Morbius!
Lie, Yads!
According to Philip Hinchcliffe on the DVD of An Evening with Philip Hinchcliffe, the original intention of the faces were to represent previous incarnations of the Doctor.
He went on to say that no matter how many Who fans say these are "mind battle faces" or "past incarnations of Morbius" doesn't matter, followed by him stating the fact that he played the Doctor.
The Doctor
Feb 9, 2020, 2:06:59 PM2/9/20
to
In article <d5793a27-6e79-4f28...@googlegroups.com>,
Cuand an lies about snipping relevant context Birdy!
The Doctor
Feb 9, 2020, 2:07:47 PM2/9/20
to
In article <4784c8f7-cb21-4590...@googlegroups.com>,
So how would Morbius counter Those faces must be the faces of Morbius!
solar penguin
Feb 9, 2020, 2:13:47 PM2/9/20
to
The Idiot insisted...
> Cuand an lies about snipping relevant context Birdy!
The ! can’t satn for itself because cuand an lies about
snipping relevant context Birdy?
> Cuand an lies about snipping relevant context Birdy!
snipping relevant context Birdy?
The Doctor
Feb 9, 2020, 2:16:03 PM2/9/20
to
In article <9ad46a4f-87fa-462c...@googlegroups.com>,
Cut and lying Solar Birdy Penguin for you.
Dinosaur to open this week's DW?
Dinosaur to open this week's DW?
stephen.w...@gmail.com
Feb 9, 2020, 2:17:25 PM2/9/20
to
Yads yapped:
>So how would Morbius counter Those faces must be the faces of Morbius!
Counter what, Yads? He was winning. His very words as you saw the other faces were "Your puny mind is powerless against the strength of Morbius. Back. To. The. Beginning!"
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages