Re: Jenna-Louise Coleman joins "Doctor Who"

[The Doctor]

In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4....@newsfe21.iad>,
fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:49:44 -0400, David wrote:
>
>
>> LONDON – Jenna-Louise Coleman has guaranteed herself a cult following
>> after landing the job as the next Doctor Who companion on the BBC 1
>> sci-fi drama.
>>
>> Coleman replaces Karen Gillan from next year and will be first seen in
>> the Doctor Who 2012 Christmas special.
>> Gillan, who plays Amy Pond, is due to leave the show this year and the
>> 25-year-old Coleman will replace her shortly after.
>>
>
>Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
>change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...

Joker. The worst years for the BBC was 1990-1996 and 1996 - 2005 .
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Alberta! Time to dump team extreme right
of either Allison or Danielle and vote for Raj the common man!

[John Hall]

>In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4....@newsfe21.iad>,
>fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>>
>>Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
>>change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...

Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want to
do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
stay./
--
John Hall
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism
by those who have not got it."
George Bernard Shaw

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn19r...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:50:10 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> The worst years for the BBC was 1990-1996 and 1996 - 2005 .
>

>You missed out 4004 BC - 1963.

Not a possibility.

>
>And 2013 or 2014 onwards.

IF DW gets yanked off the air it will be

>
>Heh.

[The Doctor]

In article <WlSHmxEF...@jhall.demon.co.uk.invalid>,

John Hall <john_...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>>In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4....@newsfe21.iad>,
>>fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
>>>change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>
>Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want to
>do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
>stay./

It is called expanding opportunities

>--
>John Hall
> "The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism
> by those who have not got it."
> George Bernard Shaw

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn1gd...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:13 +0100, John Hall

><nospam...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>>In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4....@newsfe21.iad>,
>>>fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
>>>>change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>>
>> Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want to
>> do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
>> stay./
>

>Since she had the acting ability of a dead tapeworm, I assume she was
>sacked.
>
>There are encouraging signs that her replacement may have the acting
>ability of a torpid caterpillar, which will certainly be an
>improvement.
>

Are you JOhn Long in disguise?

[Duggy]

On Mar 27, 12:50 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4.4...@newsfe21.iad>,

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy.wu...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
> >On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:49:44 -0400, David wrote:
>
> >> LONDON –  Jenna-Louise Coleman has guaranteed herself a cult following
> >> after landing the job as the next Doctor Who companion on the BBC 1
> >> sci-fi drama.
>
> >> Coleman replaces Karen Gillan from next year and will be first seen in
> >> the Doctor Who 2012 Christmas special.
> >> Gillan, who plays Amy Pond, is due to leave the show this year and the
> >> 25-year-old Coleman will replace her shortly after.
>
> >Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
> >change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>
> Joker.  The worst years for the BBC was 1990-1996 and 1996 - 2005 .

You think 1996 was doubly bad?

===
= DUG.
===

[Duggy]

On Mar 27, 3:29 am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:50:10 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>
> <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

> > The worst years for the BBC was 1990-1996 and 1996 - 2005 .
>

> You missed out 4004 BC - 1963.
>

> And 2013 or 2014 onwards.
>

> Heh.

2013 has 6 episodes of Series 7 and 13 of series 8 and some specials.

That's bad?

===
= DUG.
===

[Duggy]

On Mar 27, 4:10 am, John Hall <nospam_no...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
> Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want to
> do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
> stay./

Gillian and the producers disagree with you.

===
= DUG.
===

[Duggy]

On Mar 27, 7:55 am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:24:14 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> > In article <slrnjn1gdn.nii....@pjr.no-ip.org>,

> > Peter J Ross  <peadar.ru...@gmx.com> wrote:
> >>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:13 +0100, John Hall

> >><nospam_no...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>>>In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4.4...@newsfe21.iad>,

> >>>>fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy.wu...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>
> >>>>>Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
> >>>>>change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>
> >>> Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want to
> >>> do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
> >>> stay./
>
> >>Since she had the acting ability of a dead tapeworm, I assume she was
> >>sacked.
>
> >>There are encouraging signs that her replacement may have the acting
> >>ability of a torpid caterpillar, which will certainly be an
> >>improvement.
>
> > Are you JOhn Long in disguise?
>

> No.
>
> *discards John Long mask and costume*
>
> I am the Master.
>
> And you will obey me.

The Master? Good, I expect you to be killed very soon.

===
= DUG.
===

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn1pe...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:24:14 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>

>> In article <slrnjn1gd...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:13 +0100, John Hall
>>><nospam...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4....@newsfe21.iad>,
>>>>>fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
>>>>>>change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>>>>
>>>> Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want to
>>>> do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
>>>> stay./
>>>
>>>Since she had the acting ability of a dead tapeworm, I assume she was
>>>sacked.
>>>
>>>There are encouraging signs that her replacement may have the acting
>>>ability of a torpid caterpillar, which will certainly be an
>>>improvement.
>>>
>>
>> Are you JOhn Long in disguise?
>

>No.
>
>*discards John Long mask and costume*
>
>I am the Master.
>
>And you will obey me.
>
>

Nice try Alex Ferguson!

[The Doctor]

In article <47762129-be57-4e73...@pg2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy <p.allan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 27, 12:50=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4.4...@newsfe21.iad>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy.wu...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>> >On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:49:44 -0400, David wrote:
>>

>> >> LONDON =96 =A0Jenna-Louise Coleman has guaranteed herself a cult follo=

>wing
>> >> after landing the job as the next Doctor Who companion on the BBC 1
>> >> sci-fi drama.
>>
>> >> Coleman replaces Karen Gillan from next year and will be first seen in
>> >> the Doctor Who 2012 Christmas special.
>> >> Gillan, who plays Amy Pond, is due to leave the show this year and the
>> >> 25-year-old Coleman will replace her shortly after.
>>
>> >Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
>> >change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>>

>> Joker. =A0The worst years for the BBC was 1990-1996 and 1996 - 2005 .

>
>You think 1996 was doubly bad?
>

>=3D=3D=3D
>=3D DUG.
>=3D=3D=3D

Nope!! DW:TVM rocked!!

[The Doctor]

In article <c0512203-44fb-4d1a...@ms3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy <p.allan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>=3D=3D=3D
>=3D DUG.
>=3D=3D=3D

Peter will gripe on 'quality'.

[The Doctor]

In article <428fa8f7-7184-4089...@x10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy <p.allan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 27, 4:10=A0am, John Hall <nospam_no...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>> Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want to
>> do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
>> stay./
>
>Gillian and the producers disagree with you.
>

>=3D=3D=3D
>=3D DUG.
>=3D=3D=3D

Spot on!

[The Doctor]

In article <d7b718ee-70aa-4148...@jx17g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy <p.allan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 27, 7:55=A0am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:24:14 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> > In article <slrnjn1gdn.nii....@pjr.no-ip.org>,

>> > Peter J Ross =A0<peadar.ru...@gmx.com> wrote:
>> >>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:13 +0100, John Hall
>> >><nospam_no...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4.4...@newsfe21.iad>,
>> >>>>fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy.wu...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>>

>> >>>>>Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reaso=

>n to
>> >>>>>change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>>

>> >>> Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want=

> to
>> >>> do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
>> >>> stay./
>>
>> >>Since she had the acting ability of a dead tapeworm, I assume she was
>> >>sacked.
>>
>> >>There are encouraging signs that her replacement may have the acting
>> >>ability of a torpid caterpillar, which will certainly be an
>> >>improvement.
>>
>> > Are you JOhn Long in disguise?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> *discards John Long mask and costume*
>>
>> I am the Master.
>>
>> And you will obey me.
>
>The Master? Good, I expect you to be killed very soon.
>

>=3D=3D=3D
>=3D DUG.
>=3D=3D=3D

And get resurrected?

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn1t3...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Duggy

>Has the funding for those episodes been allocated irrevocably, or is
>there still time for the incoming Director General to pull the plug
>and flush Moffatt's forthcoming turds down the drain?
>
>

Hopefully false to the above question.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn1t6...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:16:42 -0700 (PDT), Duggy

>Damn, I'm dead now.
>
>But don't worry, I'll soon return to life without any credible
>explanation!
>
>Heh. Heh. Heh. Heh. Heh.
>
>
>

Definitely the Master.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn1ud...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:15:36 -0700 (PDT), Duggy

>Aren't The Bimbo and the producers both lying?
>
>The Bimbo is obviously way out of her depth every time she's required
>to walk and talk at the same time. The glazed look that floods her
>face every time she has to speak more than three words would be
>entirely comical if it weren't slightly sad. The idea that the BBC
>aren't desperate to get rid of her is ludicrous.
>
>She herself may even have been aware of how inept her performance was,
>however much idiotic adulation she received from Steven "TV's Mr
>Creepy Old Lecher" Moffatt, and that may have contributed to her
>acquiescence in being bundled back into obscurity.
>
>I wish her luck in her future endeavours, but she really needs to give
>up trying to be an actress, since she's hopeless at it. Jackie Lane
>and Matthew Waterhouse have both been quite successful, which proves
>that being a risible failure in Doctor Who needn't poison The Bimbo's
>whole future life.
>
>

Waterhouse was pathetic!

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn1v0...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:20:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

>Does that preclude his having been a risible failure in Doctor Who,
>like what I said?
>
>

Adric not well liked.

[Thanatos]

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:49:44 -0400, David wrote:

> >> LONDON – Jenna-Louise Coleman has guaranteed herself a cult following
> >> after landing the job as the next Doctor Who companion on the BBC 1
> >> sci-fi drama.
> >>
> >> Coleman replaces Karen Gillan from next year

What? No more gorgeous Pond? Most depressing news I've heard all month.

[Thanatos]

In article <jkpvn2$f8c$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,

doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

> In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4....@newsfe21.iad>,
> fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:

> >On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:49:44 -0400, David wrote:
> >
> >
> >> LONDON – Jenna-Louise Coleman has guaranteed herself a cult following
> >> after landing the job as the next Doctor Who companion on the BBC 1
> >> sci-fi drama.
> >>
> >> Coleman replaces Karen Gillan from next year

On the other hand, a quick check of IMDb reveals the new girl ain't no
slouch, either.

[Thanatos]

In article <slrnjn1gd...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:13 +0100, John Hall

> <nospam...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4....@newsfe21.iad>,
> >>fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
> >>>change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
> >
> > Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want to
> > do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
> > stay./
>

> Since she had the acting ability of a dead tapeworm, I assume she was
> sacked.
>
> There are encouraging signs that her replacement may have the acting
> ability of a torpid caterpillar, which will certainly be an
> improvement.

Oh, please. Like acting talent has ever been a criteria for Doctor Who.
It's over-the-top camp at best.

[Duggy]

On Mar 27, 8:59 am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:16:42 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> Damn, I'm dead now.
>
> But don't worry, I'll soon return to life without any credible
> explanation!
>
> Heh. Heh. Heh. Heh. Heh.

Yes. That is true. Will you look the same or different this time?

===
= DUG.
===

[Duggy]

On Mar 27, 9:15 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <47762129-be57-4e73-9b0b-eca87dcf0...@pg2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Duggy  <p.allan.dug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 27, 12:50=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> >> In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4.4...@newsfe21.iad>,
>
> >> fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy.wu...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:49:44 -0400, David wrote:
>
> >> >> LONDON =96 =A0Jenna-Louise Coleman has guaranteed herself a cult follo=
> >wing
> >> >> after landing the job as the next Doctor Who companion on the BBC 1
> >> >> sci-fi drama.
>
> >> >> Coleman replaces Karen Gillan from next year and will be first seen in
> >> >> the Doctor Who 2012 Christmas special.
> >> >> Gillan, who plays Amy Pond, is due to leave the show this year and the
> >> >> 25-year-old Coleman will replace her shortly after.
>
> >> >Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
> >> >change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>
> >> Joker. =A0The worst years for the BBC was 1990-1996 and 1996 - 2005 .
>
> >You think 1996 was doubly bad?

> Nope!!  DW:TVM rocked!!

Did you mean 1990 - 1995, 1997 - 2005?

===
= DUG.
===

[Duggy]

On Mar 27, 8:57 am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Duggy

> Has the funding for those episodes been allocated irrevocably, or is
> there still time for the incoming Director General to pull the plug
> and flush Moffatt's forthcoming turds down the drain?

Series 7 is in production, so 2013 has those episodes.

===
= DUG.
===

[Duggy]

More Pond, but then no more Pond.

I hate how everything says the Ponds go and the new girl comes in.

I'd rather see the new girl join at the beginning of the season and be
there when the old companions leave.

===
= DUG.
===

[Ignis Fatuus]

She could have a passionate fling with Rory and elope in the Tardis
leaving Amy behind.

[Duggy]

Eloping would require a divorce.

===
= DUG.
===

[The Doctor]

In article <atropos-F8FBFE...@news.giganews.com>,

They are young.

[The Doctor]

In article <atropos-C9A79F...@news.giganews.com>,

10/10 .

[The Doctor]

In article <atropos-D58F46...@news.giganews.com>,

PJRoss is a kook.

[The Doctor]

In article <1c32954e-5f82-4315...@x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy <p.allan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 27, 9:15=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <47762129-be57-4e73-9b0b-eca87dcf0...@pg2g2000pbb.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Duggy =A0<p.allan.dug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> >On Mar 27, 12:50=3DA0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> >> In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4.4...@newsfe21.iad>,
>>
>> >> fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy.wu...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>> >> >On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:49:44 -0400, David wrote:
>>

>> >> >> LONDON =3D96 =3DA0Jenna-Louise Coleman has guaranteed herself a cul=
>t follo=3D

>> >wing
>> >> >> after landing the job as the next Doctor Who companion on the BBC 1
>> >> >> sci-fi drama.
>>

>> >> >> Coleman replaces Karen Gillan from next year and will be first seen=

> in
>> >> >> the Doctor Who 2012 Christmas special.

>> >> >> Gillan, who plays Amy Pond, is due to leave the show this year and =

>the
>> >> >> 25-year-old Coleman will replace her shortly after.
>>

>> >> >Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason=

> to
>> >> >change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>>

>> >> Joker. =3DA0The worst years for the BBC was 1990-1996 and 1996 - 2005 =

>.
>>
>> >You think 1996 was doubly bad?
>

>> Nope!! =A0DW:TVM rocked!!

>
>Did you mean 1990 - 1995, 1997 - 2005?
>

>=3D=3D=3D
>=3D DUG.
>=3D=3D=3D

I stand corrected.

[The Doctor]

In article <67d13e3b-75fb-4f6a...@wb9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy <p.allan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 27, 11:09=A0am, Thanatos <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:49:44 -0400, David wrote:

>> > >> LONDON =96 =A0Jenna-Louise Coleman has guaranteed herself a cult fol=

>lowing
>> > >> after landing the job as the next Doctor Who companion on the BBC 1
>> > >> sci-fi drama.
>>
>> > >> Coleman replaces Karen Gillan from next year
>>
>> What? No more gorgeous Pond? Most depressing news I've heard all month.
>
>More Pond, but then no more Pond.
>
>I hate how everything says the Ponds go and the new girl comes in.
>
>I'd rather see the new girl join at the beginning of the season and be
>there when the old companions leave.
>

>=3D=3D=3D
>=3D DUG.
>=3D=3D=3D

NAme of companion?

[The Doctor]

In article <98a2n71qh5msuji3e...@4ax.com>,

NO!

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn6l8...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:51:23 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <atropos-D58F46...@news.giganews.com>,
>> Thanatos <atr...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>In article <slrnjn1gd...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>>> Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:13 +0100, John Hall
>>>> <nospam...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>In article <6FXbr.9765$Ce4....@newsfe21.iad>,
>>>> >>fuzzy.wuzzy <fuzzy...@fuzzywuzzy.us> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Wrong, no following here. Karen Gillan can continue on. See no reason to
>>>> >>>change.... well take Dr. Who off the list...
>>>> >
>>>> > Presumably the reason for the change is that Karen Gillan didn't want to
>>>> > do it any more. I'm sure that the producers would have wanted her to
>>>> > stay./
>>>>
>>>> Since she had the acting ability of a dead tapeworm, I assume she was
>>>> sacked.
>>>>
>>>> There are encouraging signs that her replacement may have the acting
>>>> ability of a torpid caterpillar, which will certainly be an
>>>> improvement.
>>>
>>>Oh, please. Like acting talent has ever been a criteria for Doctor Who.
>>>It's over-the-top camp at best.
>>
>> PJRoss is a kook.
>

>Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.
>

I will let you do your own honours.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn6lk...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:32:26 -0700 (PDT), Duggy

>Not sure. But I can promise that I'll be wearing a lot of make up and
>talking in a silly voice during the first two or three episodes.
>
>Meanwhile I've been busy measuring my "surprisingly spacious" Ionic
>Columm for carpets and curtains.
>
>"It's not cramped, it's *bijou*," said the estate agent. I think I'm
>going to miniaturise him.
>
>Heh. Heh. Heh. Heh. Heh. Heh.
>

How masterly.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn6ln...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:35:12 -0700 (PDT), Duggy

>One could have said the same about "Shada".
>
>

No labour disputes and Labour is the opposition.

[Adam H. Kerman]

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>>>Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.

>>I will let you do your own honours.

>OK.

>None.

Bet you can't name all your revenge froups.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn6pq...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:11:04 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <slrnjn6l8...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.
>>>
>>
>> I will let you do your own honours.
>

>OK.
>
>None.
>
>Now it's your turn.
>
>

alt.usenet.kooks is your home.

[The Doctor]

In article <jkvp3b$8er$2...@news.albasani.net>,

Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>>>>Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.
>
>>>I will let you do your own honours.
>
>>OK.
>
>>None.
>
>Bet you can't name all your revenge froups.

Name them!

[mimus]

On Mar 28, 3:51 pm, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

> In rec.arts.drwho on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:34:04 +0000 (UTC), Adam H.
>
> Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:

> No, but I liked
>         alt.asshat.pjr
> and
>         alt.asshat.peterjross
> best.

We don do steenkin "Likes" on Usenet.

> Flaagg, doyen of the Flonk, was the only other recipient of more than
> one of the original alt.asshat.* revenge froups. IIRC, it was the
> vengeful denizens of alt.snuh who newgrouped them in exchange for
> being laughed at, and nobody laughed at them more than Flaagg and I.
>
> [aavfff added]

Blah blah blah.

--

Where _is_ Flaagg, anyway?

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn6qt...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:34:04 +0000 (UTC), Adam H.

>Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.
>>
>>>>I will let you do your own honours.
>>
>>>OK.
>>
>>>None.
>>
>> Bet you can't name all your revenge froups.
>

>No, but I liked
> alt.asshat.pjr
>and
> alt.asshat.peterjross
>best.
>

>Flaagg, doyen of the Flonk, was the only other recipient of more than
>one of the original alt.asshat.* revenge froups. IIRC, it was the
>vengeful denizens of alt.snuh who newgrouped them in exchange for
>being laughed at, and nobody laughed at them more than Flaagg and I.
>
>[aavfff added]
>

Alt.wasteland for you.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn6qv...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:40:42 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <jkvp3b$8er$2...@news.albasani.net>,
>> Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.
>>>
>>>>>I will let you do your own honours.
>>>
>>>>OK.
>>>
>>>>None.
>>>
>>>Bet you can't name all your revenge froups.
>>
>> Name them!
>

>How confident are you that Adam will obey your orders?
>

MAke a guess.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjn6ra...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:40:23 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <slrnjn6pq...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>In rec.arts.drwho on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:11:04 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>>><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <slrnjn6l8...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>>>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will let you do your own honours.
>>>
>>>OK.
>>>
>>>None.
>>>
>>>Now it's your turn.
>>
>> alt.usenet.kooks is your home.
>

>*sigh*
>
>How many times do I have to explain to you what everybody else already
>knows?
>
>USENET ISN'T REAL.
>
>
>

Tell that to port 119.

[Duggy]

On Mar 29, 4:22 am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:35:12 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> <p.allan.dug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 27, 8:57 am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> >> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>
> >> <p.allan.dug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mar 27, 3:29 am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

> >> >> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:50:10 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

>
> >> >> <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> >> >> > The worst years for the BBC was 1990-1996 and 1996 - 2005 .
>
> >> >> You missed out 4004 BC - 1963.
>
> >> >> And 2013 or 2014 onwards.
>
> >> >> Heh.
>
> >> > 2013 has 6 episodes of Series 7 and 13 of series 8 and some specials.
>
> >> > That's bad?
>
> >> Has the funding for those episodes been allocated irrevocably, or is
> >> there still time for the incoming Director General to pull the plug
> >> and flush Moffatt's forthcoming turds down the drain?
>
> > Series 7 is in production, so 2013 has those episodes.
>
> One could have said the same about "Shada".

Expecting a strike?

===
= DUG.
===

[Duggy]

On Mar 29, 4:21 am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> Not sure. But I can promise that I'll be wearing a lot of make up and
> talking in a silly voice during the first two or three episodes.

Yes, I've heard that about you.

===
= DUG.
===

[meowmix]

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:51:24 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:34:04 +0000 (UTC), Adam H.

>Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.
>>
>>>>I will let you do your own honours.
>>
>>>OK.
>>
>>>None.
>>
>> Bet you can't name all your revenge froups.
>

>No, but I liked
> alt.asshat.pjr
>and
> alt.asshat.peterjross
>best.
>
>Flaagg, doyen of the Flonk, was the only other recipient of more than
>one of the original alt.asshat.* revenge froups. IIRC, it was the
>vengeful denizens of alt.snuh who newgrouped them in exchange for
>being laughed at, and nobody laughed at them more than Flaagg and I.
>
>[aavfff added]

humphries threatend me with them, i said go for it. he pussied out when he ralized i couldn't care less.



--


.;+IYXVVVVXBRRXYt+.
:+IRBBRXV+;:;;tYYYtiIYXY+.
. .;,. . ..:+IXXIVVIItIi=+iiiVVI++;;++tVX+
,IBMRRVt, .+IXVIit;;tYtIRRYIIYVYVVYYVXRX=;+IXI.
.IBBRRBBBRIIBBV=;;+VtiYVYYXBRXXXRVVYYYRBMRYIitVRI.
+XBRi==++ti+iIi=itVBBXXRXVIt+;:,.......,=XBBVtVRR+
=WBBt+=;t+;=+YRYYVBBRVt=:.. IRt:iYXI.
YMBRYItXRYIYYXRXVt=:. ,Xt:+YXY.
,t;. ... .+RRVVYVBMBRXY+;, ,Xt=IRRY.
:BXVt.. ..=IVRBR;. :+IVVYYI+;:. :RXiVBMI.
tXRIIV: ,iYYRBXRi.. . ..... . .=YVI; ..IXRVi. =Xt:+VBt
;RXV+=YR:.,,,,....iY++VBRRI. .=IXRRXXXt: .:IXRRRXVI;. +Xi+YB+.YBIXBMi IVi:tRB+
.VXBY=+IVRRBRBRBMMRX;+iYRRX; ,VBVIYXXXVYVI,. .VBXIIYVYtIXV, YV+;YMX.BRYVBRR,IV=:tVX:
;RRRi;+===tiIYIYY+iYVIIXRRY.,RV+tXBMMBBY+VX, ,VVYYRBBRYI+iVX,tXIIXMX:MXYItYR+XY;=IXV:
.IXYi;;YVVItIXRIVIttIIIIIXRi.tY=iYXV+;IRX+IXI.IX+tRBBBBXYt+tXY;BRVVMMiMXY==璽XXRt:+IXI.
,VVi;+VYXRRVIIVIVRXVRYtIIYR=.Ri=tVXt,,=BIiiVX:RI+tRMX+:tXYi+YB;XBVVBBRBIt=;�tYI;:iVR+
.:RI;=tYBt+=VVt+YBt+I+RIIYRW+:Ri;+iiIRXXI;;tVR+X+iIRBt. .RYt=IRIiMRYXRXIItti;::,,=IXB;
...,;WXiiIYR+X;YVi;IRY==itIVXRM=:Ri=ittYRRRYIIVRViX+tIRMi .VYt=tRV:BRYYYYYVtIIt+==iYRBX,
...:MX+IYI=.:=tVYYBV=..,=tRRBW+:Ri+IYXRRRXVVVVI=+X+tIRMt YYt=tRX,IBVYXRRYIYIItIVRBBMI
..,,,:;MBVXRI;:,:;+BMWt;::;+VBYXMI,VI+IRBi:,,,iIY+ ;Xi+VBBV. .VVi=YBX,:BV=VBVIVRRI+YXBBBM+
. ..,VBIiVRI+=;;+iBRi+==iVWIIXBX.;XitYVX+:iXt+IRI.XIiRBBB=.=RI=iRMI..VYiitIYX璛YV+=VBBBR:
=BY=tRMMBXi+IXWVIttYRY+ttVR=.iV++tIYYI+;iYRV.+RXVRRVXVVI++RBR= .=Ri;tIYRI:BYYRBBMI.
.XY=+IM#WWYYX##WMMMMY+;+tIVR, +XYt++=+tYXRV=. IMXt++++;;tXBBt. .VVIIYVRi.IMRBBBR=
;Ri:=tVBMMBWBVVRt;XVY=,;tIVV: ,tVRRXXXXY+, =XXYtiitIVRVi. .YRXRVi, ;YXXY=
.iRi:;itIVXtttI+, .tXXVIIYVXB+. .:;;+I+. ,iIIi:.+IXXXXXYt: .:tt=.
iXYi++tIVXBY.. .:+iiti++;. .iVRBX,:XI;tVR= .+III=.. .YVtYXV.
.;XXVVVRVIi= ,VVYYt+;. . .;RV+tXI.iX=:iVXI;RY++YRR: . .,VY;:tYXY.
.iYIi; .iRYi+iYXVi. .+MY;=IXi.tV+iXVXItXi;=tRBB: . ,RY;:+tYXV,
=RI=:+VRRRi=BR;;tVXi.tRVYIYXI;BBRVIVBBR:. :RRYiiIYVRi.
+Xt;+IYRXBBRt;ttYXi.tMXiiIXY.+BBRVIVRVX;:RRVIXBRXRt,
VVi;YBBBRXYi+IIIRt.tMR;iIVY. +BBBVtitYXVIttVXVVRi,
=XVYVBBBBRRtttIYXt.iMX;iIBX. =RRIi+=++=::itIVXi.
.RBXYRBBBBBItItIVY.+MV:iVBX. ;XVIt+==;+tIIVRi,
tBRYXBBRBVttt+tXX.+BI:tBBX.. :XVItIttIVXRXi.
;MRVVBRYIIIIt=iRR,:Rt:IBBR,. .:XY+iIYRRVXt,
,RBVIYItiYXXIiVBB,,Xt;VBBX:. ..VY=+VBRIiYX;
.VBt;tIXVRVVBVVBB;.XY+tIVR: .VRttVBBIt=+YR+.
IXi:iVRXR+tBVVBM+.YV+tIVR; .VBXVVBBRII+;tRBI..
iXi:+YXV,:+MVYRRt :VRXXRI, .YBXVVRBBVYIItIXRRV, ;i+:,
+Vi:+VBR,.=MY=tVX, ,+i+;.. .YBRYYRRXRIVXVYI++IVVVVtiYVt.
iV+:IBBR: ,Xt:+IYXVVXV+ .IBVItYVVRt.,IXVIt=;+tt=.;iXX:
IV==RBBR: .IVi+tIt+;;iXI..tXt;=tIVXt, =XVIti+t+=+iYXY,
.VI=IBBBX, ,VXYIIIIIYYRt.+Ri:=iIVRI, :XRRRBXIIYVXX+.
:RVIVRXRV,. =YXXXXXXXI,+Xt==tYVRY, .tBMBXXXXVI;.
iV+=tIYXt. .,:=++=:.=Rt;tXBBMY: ,iIIt+;,
.RI;+YRVR= . . . .+Xt:=tYXBV:
. YBVtXBXXV,. . .:+i+IVVi:=tIVXV;
.,;=tBXtYVIVR+. IVti==;,,=tIYXY;
.YVi+=:,;iIVRI,, VVi+;;;=itIVRV;
;Xt+=;=+tIVRY;. IXYIttIIYYVRI:
,RYViitYYXXI: .+VXXXXXXXY=.
=VRXXXXXVi, .,;ti+=:.
..:=+t+;,


January 2012 winner of the UNABOMBER SURPRISE.

mhm x v i x i i i


meow

[The Doctor]

In article <j677n7p13o89f14p5...@4ax.com>,

meowmix <meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:51:24 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>
>>In rec.arts.drwho on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:34:04 +0000 (UTC), Adam H.
>>Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.
>>>
>>>>>I will let you do your own honours.
>>>
>>>>OK.
>>>
>>>>None.
>>>
>>> Bet you can't name all your revenge froups.
>>
>>No, but I liked
>> alt.asshat.pjr
>>and
>> alt.asshat.peterjross
>>best.
>>
>>Flaagg, doyen of the Flonk, was the only other recipient of more than
>>one of the original alt.asshat.* revenge froups. IIRC, it was the
>>vengeful denizens of alt.snuh who newgrouped them in exchange for
>>being laughed at, and nobody laughed at them more than Flaagg and I.
>>
>>[aavfff added]
>
>humphries threatend me with them, i said go for it. he pussied out when he ralized i couldn't care less.
>

YAWN!

[meowmix]

instead of wasting your time on usenet, wouldn't it be better spent finding out if cybermen have nuts or are more like a ken
doll, or watching down and dirty nekid dalek pr0n (i would imagine it looks like squid fighting)?

btw, fuckhead, diddling the x-post line is asking to have your ng added to every post i make.

[meowmix]

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:30:25 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

[Michael Bowker]

Actually there's a photo spread with Katy Manning naked draped over a
Dalek and a movie called abducted by Daleks
(http://straight.fleshbot.com/139791/hot-daleks-porn). It's amazing
what's on the internet.

[Duggy]

On Mar 29, 4:58 pm, Michael Bowker <mi...@rawbw.com> wrote:
> Actually there's a photo spread with Katy Manning naked draped over a
> Dalek and a movie called abducted by Daleks
> (http://straight.fleshbot.com/139791/hot-daleks-porn).  It's amazing
> what's on the internet.

Even more amazing than that. There's a lego version of the Katy
Manning photo spread.

http://dalektricity.wordpress.com/2010/06/15/lego-daleks/

===
= DUG.
===

[The Doctor]

In article <0k87n7hbs53d6qn1f...@4ax.com>,

>btw, diddling the x-post line is asking to have your ng added to every post i make.

Sexteminate! Spammers like meowmix must be Sexterminated!

[The Doctor]

In article <6KTcr.46754$IQ1....@newsfe18.iad>,

Girl for you.

[ah]

Nice!

http://vimeo.com/26941212

>>
>> btw, fuckhead, diddling the x-post line is asking to have your ng added to every post i make.

--
a "http://teapartyjesus.tumblr.com/" h

[The Doctor]

In article <4f75020a$0$17209$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com>,

Sad indeed.

[meowmix]

heh. i read about that years ago. i just found a review of it on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZHpWRHxpZM

[The Doctor]

In article <3t68n7lqh00lkhqlc...@4ax.com>,

You are gutted.

[meowmix]

i shall allow you to think that as i'm nice like that.

[The Doctor]

In article <30ejn79vrr8qq7lqp...@4ax.com>,

REal cats rock, you suck!!

[Ignis Fatuus]

On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:01:22 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross
<p...@example.invalid> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:35:33 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

>Congratulations on the success of your plan to exclude all trolls from
>RADw!
>
>You've definitely chased meowmix away for ever!

Meowmix is no troll.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjnjqb...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:35:33 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>

>Congratulations on the success of your plan to exclude all trolls from
>RADw!
>
>You've definitely chased meowmix away for ever!
>
>
>

Thank you.

PJR - DW Fan xor kook ?

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjnjql...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:31:07 +0100, meowmix

>Pssst. Yads has learned not to fiddle with the Followup-To line, so
>now he's snipping the Flonk from his replies.
>
>

Well he should not putting them back in.

[The Doctor]

In article <ajqjn7p0kbe4m7abc...@4ax.com>,

Just a kook.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjnjuq...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 02 Apr 2012 19:09:02 +0100, Ignis Fatuus
><Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote:
>
>> Meowmix is no troll.
>
>PPOSTFU.

BE NICE!!

[The Doctor]

In article <3e2ffe95-85f4-4b9a...@to5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy <p.allan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 29, 4:22=A0am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:35:12 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <p.allan.dug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > On Mar 27, 8:57=A0am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>> >> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>>
>> >> <p.allan.dug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> >> > On Mar 27, 3:29=A0am, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>> >> >> In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:50:10 +0000 (UTC), The Doc=

>tor
>>
>> >> >> <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> >> >> > The worst years for the BBC was 1990-1996 and 1996 - 2005 .
>>
>> >> >> You missed out 4004 BC - 1963.
>>
>> >> >> And 2013 or 2014 onwards.
>>
>> >> >> Heh.
>>

>> >> > 2013 has 6 episodes of Series 7 and 13 of series 8 and some specials=

>.
>>
>> >> > That's bad?
>>
>> >> Has the funding for those episodes been allocated irrevocably, or is
>> >> there still time for the incoming Director General to pull the plug
>> >> and flush Moffatt's forthcoming turds down the drain?
>>
>> > Series 7 is in production, so 2013 has those episodes.
>>
>> One could have said the same about "Shada".
>
>Expecting a strike?
>

Good question.

[The Doctor]

In article <5d0c842d-272e-47af...@k4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
mimus <mim...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 28, 3:51=A0pm, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>
>> In rec.arts.drwho on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:34:04 +0000 (UTC), Adam H.
>>
>> Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>

>> > Peter J Ross <peadar.ru...@gmx.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Peter J Ross =A0<peadar.ru...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>>> Feel free to list the Kook Awards I've won.
>>
>> >>> I will let you do your own honours.
>>
>> >> OK.
>>
>> >>N one.
>>
>> > Bet you can't name all your revenge froups.
>>
>> No, but I liked

>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 alt.asshat.pjr
>> and
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 alt.asshat.peterjross
>> best.
>
>We don do steenkin "Likes" on Usenet.

>
>> Flaagg, doyen of the Flonk, was the only other recipient of more than
>> one of the original alt.asshat.* revenge froups. IIRC, it was the
>> vengeful denizens of alt.snuh who newgrouped them in exchange for
>> being laughed at, and nobody laughed at them more than Flaagg and I.
>>
>> [aavfff added]
>

>Blah blah blah.
>
>--
>
>Where _is_ Flaagg, anyway?

Whatever!

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjnjr5...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>[flonk restored]
>
>In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:27:19 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

>It's not "his" newsgroup. Yads is generally despised in RADw - so much
>so that I've sometimes had to defend him against real-lifing,
>netcopping and threats of violence. I'm pleased to be able to say that
>there hasn't been much of that kind of nastiness lately. I think I
>threatened to set rocky on them if they didn't behave better. :-)

>
>> Sexteminate! Spammers like meowmix must be Sexterminated!
>

>That was quite amusing and vaguley flonkish.
>
>But when replying to meowmix, please include a newsgroup that meowmix
>reads.
>
>

Denied.

[meowmix]

On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:31:07 +0100, meowmix
><meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:
>

>Pssst. Yads has learned not to fiddle with the Followup-To line, so
>now he's snipping the Flonk from his replies.

he's special, isn't he, but not in the good way.

[meowmix]

On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:15:27 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

>[flonk restored]
>
>In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:27:19 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>

>It's not "his" newsgroup. Yads is generally despised in RADw - so much
>so that I've sometimes had to defend him against real-lifing,

i guess it is possible to defend a skunk. who'd have ever believed that?

>netcopping and threats of violence. I'm pleased to be able to say that
>there hasn't been much of that kind of nastiness lately. I think I
>threatened to set rocky on them if they didn't behave better. :-)

that's not a very nice thing to do, he's a complete fuckhead and trouble maker.

>> Sexteminate! Spammers like meowmix must be Sexterminated!
>

>That was quite amusing and vaguley flonkish.
>
>But when replying to meowmix, please include a newsgroup that meowmix
>reads.

aha. he did. i re-subbed radw during the week. i've not read it for something like 10 years.

[The Doctor]

In article <ehlln7pt1j5srlhjk...@4ax.com>,

Exterminate Meowmix!!

[The Doctor]

In article <5e03o75jbmp3p5ulj...@4ax.com>,

Request denied. Extermination by dalek on meowmix will
take place.

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjoenk...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>[newsgroups line corrected]
>
>In rec.arts.drwho on Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:47:26 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

>Eradicate Meowmix!!!
>
>--
>PJR :-) | οἵη περ φύλλων γενεὴ, τοίη δὲ καὶ ἀνδρῶν.
> | φύλλα τὰ μέν τ' ἄνεμος χαμάδις χέει, ἄλλα δέ θ' ὕλη
> | τηλεθόωσα φύει, ἔαρος δ' ἐπιγίγνεται ὥρη·
> | ὣς ἀνδρῶν γενεὴ ἡ μὲν φύει ἡ δ' ἀπολήγει. (Homer)
>

Send in the Dalek to take on meowmix!

[The Doctor]

In article <slrnjoeq3...@pjr.no-ip.org>,

Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:12:43 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <slrnjoenk...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>[newsgroups line corrected]
>>>
>>>In rec.arts.drwho on Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:47:26 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>>><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <ehlln7pt1j5srlhjk...@4ax.com>,
>>>> meowmix <meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:
>>>>>On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Pssst. Yads has learned not to fiddle with the Followup-To line, so
>>>>>>now he's snipping the Flonk from his replies.
>>>>>
>>>>>he's special, isn't he, but not in the good way.
>>>>
>>>> Exterminate Meowmix!!
>>> Eradicate Meowmix!!!

>> Send in the Dalek to take on meowmix!

>Feed Meowmix to the Slyther!
>

Good idea.

[meowmix]

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:00:27 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

>[newsgroups line corrected]
>
>In rec.arts.drwho on Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:47:26 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>

>Eradicate Meowmix!!!
emancipate meowmix!!!!

[meowmix]

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:12:43 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

>In article <slrnjoenk...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>[newsgroups line corrected]
>>
>>In rec.arts.drwho on Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:47:26 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <ehlln7pt1j5srlhjk...@4ax.com>,
>>> meowmix <meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:
>>>>On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Pssst. Yads has learned not to fiddle with the Followup-To line, so
>>>>>now he's snipping the Flonk from his replies.
>>>>
>>>>he's special, isn't he, but not in the good way.
>>>
>>> Exterminate Meowmix!!
>>Eradicate Meowmix!!!
>>
>>--

>>PJR :-) | οἵη πεÏ? φύλλων γενεὴ, τοίη δὲ καὶ ἀνδÏ?ῶν.

>> | φύλλα τὰ μέν τ' ἄνεμος χαμάδις χέει, ἄλλα δέ θ' ὕλη

>> | τηλεθόωσα φύει, ἔαÏ?ος δ' �¼?πιγίγνεται ὥÏ?η·
>> | ὣς ἀνδÏ?ῶν γενεὴ ἡ μὲν φύει ἡ δ' ἀπολήγει. (Homer)

>>
>
>Send in the Dalek to take on meowmix!

i have lots of tins of koperberg cider, i shall drink them all and become cider (cretin) man and poke the dalek in the
eyestalk.

[meowmix]

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:42:48 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:12:43 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor

><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>> In article <slrnjoenk...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>> Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>[newsgroups line corrected]
>>>
>>>In rec.arts.drwho on Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:47:26 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>>><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <ehlln7pt1j5srlhjk...@4ax.com>,
>>>> meowmix <meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:
>>>>>On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Pssst. Yads has learned not to fiddle with the Followup-To line, so
>>>>>>now he's snipping the Flonk from his replies.
>>>>>
>>>>>he's special, isn't he, but not in the good way.
>>>>
>>>> Exterminate Meowmix!!
>>> Eradicate Meowmix!!!

>> Send in the Dalek to take on meowmix!

>Feed Meowmix to the Slyther!

i aint scared. i shall pour a ton of salt on them.

[meowmix]

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:09:06 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:

>In rec.arts.drwho on Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:26:34 +0100, meowmix

><meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:
>
>> i re-subbed radw during the week. i've not read it for something
>> like 10 years.
>

>Not much happens here in RADw that's of any conceivable interest to
>people who aren't Doctor Who fans.

you mean there are people who do not like dr who? never.

>Fortunately, you qualify as a DW fan, since I know for a fact that you
>strongly prefer the real Pertwee/Baker stuff to the dodgy parody that
>purports to be DW nowadays.

pertwee is the bestest.

>Welcome. If the debate gets too fierce, you can take refuge in
>rec.arts.drwho.moderated.

i'm laughing at the fact there is a moderated dr who ng.

[The Doctor]

In article <hielo71bqhd31nggm...@4ax.com>,

meowmix <meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:12:43 +0000 (UTC), doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>
>>In article <slrnjoenk...@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>>Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>[newsgroups line corrected]
>>>
>>>In rec.arts.drwho on Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:47:26 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor
>>><doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <ehlln7pt1j5srlhjk...@4ax.com>,
>>>> meowmix <meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:
>>>>>On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC), Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Pssst. Yads has learned not to fiddle with the Followup-To line, so
>>>>>>now he's snipping the Flonk from his replies.
>>>>>
>>>>>he's special, isn't he, but not in the good way.
>>>>
>>>> Exterminate Meowmix!!
>>>Eradicate Meowmix!!!
>>>
>>>--
>>>PJR :-) | οἵη πεÏ? φύλλων γενεὴ, τοίη δὲ καὶ ἀνδÏ?ῶν.
>>> | φύλλα τὰ μέν τ' ἄνεμος χαμάδις χέει, ἄλλα δέ θ' ὕλη
>>> | τηλεθόωσα φύει, ἔαÏ?ος δ' �¼?πιγίγνεται ὥÏ?η·
>>> | ὣς ἀνδÏ?ῶν γενεὴ ἡ μὲν φύει ἡ δ' ἀπολήγει. (Homer)
>>>
>>
>>Send in the Dalek to take on meowmix!
>
>i have lots of tins of koperberg cider, i shall drink them all and become cider (cretin) man and poke the dalek in the
>eyestalk.

Care you impair the visiob of a Dalek?

[The Doctor]

In article <qpelo7pj5r8bat864...@4ax.com>,

Care to waltz into it?