AUDRA ROURK MCHUGH
Public <Anonymous_Account>
From: you know exactly who, bitch.
Date: 06 May 2001
Time: 21:18:28
Comments
Deranged science-fiction fan with sexual obsessions with actors she has never met. Will cyberstalk and harass you if you have met those actors, and will brazenly call where you work, lie to your boss, lie to the police and lie to the internet community about people she doesn't even know and hasn't met. She found out I was doing business with a British actor about whom she was writing web porn (in which said actor's TV character, whom she thinks is very real, is being raped by herself wearing a dildo and a fictional face -- and she thinks people who have read her purple prose drivel cannot determine this from reading it), and proceeded to investigate my entire life, print lies about me, telephone across country every day to lie to my studio boss, until my reputation was shattered and I resigned from my job to find a new one. She imagines herself a 'web designer and webmaster' and actually works for a nonprofit pageantry organization based near Littleton, Colorado (home of MAN!
Y loonies), but will lie to authorities and officials claiming she works for the media as a journalist, which she is in fact positively NOT. Jealous, handy wth words, and convinced of her own genius, this fat, sloppy, and penis-envying, sexually confused alpha female sits on her wide chocolate-and-romance-book fattened ass shooting spurious rumors and outright lies at the successful, thinner women she is envious of, so intelligent women beware! (English actors too) This one's one of the reasons men think all women are deranged maniacs... and I'm a woman. INSTANT KARMA'S GONNA GET YOU, YOU FAT WHORE. YOU HAVEN'T GOTTEN AWAY WITH A THING. THE FAN COMMUNITY KNOWS YOU LIED, YOU KNOW YOU LIED, AND ON TOP OF ALL THAT, YOUR FAVORITE ACTOR KNOWS YOU LIED. He's scared of you, honey... BUT I'M NOT. I HAVE AN INTERNET DEFAMATION ATTORNEY NOW, BITCH. NEXT TIME YOU WANT TO ASSASSINATE MY CHARACTER ONLINE, YOU PUT ON THAT FAKE MARILYN MONROE VOICE OF YOURS, AND BRING IT ON. You will be su!
ed and I will win. My lawyer's done it before. Show your fat face again and he'll investigate YOU. :)
---
This post was anonymized at http://www.xganon.com
Come visit the newest xganon server http://www.xganon.org providing
rights and freedom related news.
---
Amsel Zivkovich
For those of you who don't know what the f**k that was about (like me
when I first read it). Here is a news story I found that might shed
some light onto it.
http://webpages.marshall.edu/~lilly1/whonews.html
It seems like this poster is not all that anonymous. I can't believe
people would get this worked up over such trivial sh*t.
Alden Bates
> This one's one of the reasons men think all women are deranged maniacs... and I'm a woman.
You're also a deranged maniac. Can somebody please show Ms McCoy to a
cell before she strains herself?
Alden.
--
____ _ ___
/ | |__________________________| | _ `
/ ' | _ http://www.tetrap.com/ _ | _ `
/_/|_|_| |_|___/
Unkempt
Zivkovich) skrunggeret:
<snip mildly entertaining deranged raving>
>For those of you who don't know what the f**k that was about (like me
>when I first read it). Here is a news story I found that might shed
>some light onto it.
>
>http://webpages.marshall.edu/~lilly1/whonews.html
>
>It seems like this poster is not all that anonymous. I can't believe
>people would get this worked up over such trivial sh*t.
>
But that was _4_years_ago_!
Did they just let her out, or what?
Conrad
Auntie Krizu
Well, this just says more about Karen McCoy herself than anyone else. *sigh*
Auntie Krizu(:>), Audra fan, goddammit.
norville
<Anonymous_Account>" <rema...@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> Audra Rourk McHugh
> From: you know exactly who, bitch.
> Date: 06 May 2001
> Time: 21:18:28
Oh, look, it's Karen bloody McCoy! Some of us remember this story, and
Audra wasn't the problem.
> This one's one of the reasons men think all women are deranged
maniacs... and I'm a woman.
*You're* one of the reasons for the above. Go away, little girl.
RuthKub
Auntie Krizu
"RuthKub" <rut...@aol.com> kirjoitti viestissä
news:20010810211904...@mb-fs.aol.com...
> Wow!!! Sounds like you've been having some trouble there!
Actually, the other way around.
Auntie Krizu(:>)
RuthKub
>
>Actually, the other way around.
>
>Auntie Krizu(:>)
>
Yeah, actually I posted that before I read the article on the link from one of
the other posts. It seems like a really weird situation, though.
Doctor TOC
>
> For those of you who don't know what the f**k that was about (like me
> when I first read it). Here is a news story I found that might shed
> some light onto it.
>
> http://webpages.marshall.edu/~lilly1/whonews.html
>
> It seems like this poster is not all that anonymous. I can't believe
> people would get this worked up over such trivial sh*t.
Ross Ruediger is the one I feel sorry for. He's the guy who delivered
the presentation on Karen McCoy's "proposed animated series" at
Visions'97 in good faith, fielding questions as best he could based on
some very incomplete notes from Ms McCoy. He was a thoroughly nice chap
who pretty much vanished after realising how completely he'd been
suckered by the psychotic bitch. Karen McCoy is a world class looney.
Why she's woken up after four years is anyone's guess.
Doctor TOC
--
The Reverend Doctor "The Other Chris"
Assignment: Secret Elf
Wu Name: Jive Talkin' Choirboy
ICQ # 4814586
Daleks! 3D - http://users.rcn.com/otherchris/
Time War RPG - http://jump.to/TimeWar
alt.tv.sevendays FAQ - http://welcome.to/7-Days
The TOC Files - http://members.fortunecity.com/toc
AJCDREW
Yeah!!!!!!!!
Cathcart (really confused)
Who Goes There?
took a keyboard, and wrote the following:
>Why she's woken up after four years is anyone's guess.
But has she? why go to the trouble of making yourself unknown if
you're going to make it clear exactly who you are? Or am I applying
logic here to a situation that has no logic...?
BCinU,
Gareth.
Dimensions On Tyne: 17th and 18th of November, 2001.
Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, England.
www.dimensionsontyne.com
norville
garethpa...@yahoo.co.uk (Who Goes There?) wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 00:05:36 -0400, Doctor TOC <other...@erols.com>
> took a keyboard, and wrote the following:
> >Why she's woken up after four years is anyone's guess.
>
> But has she? why go to the trouble of making yourself unknown if
> you're going to make it clear exactly who you are? Or am I applying
> logic here to a situation that has no logic...?
There's very little logic here. I remember Karen McCoy claiming that
Harlan Ellison supported her; J. Michael Straczynski (JMS of "Babylon 5")
reported that Ellison had never heard of her. (Ellison may be nasty, but
he's also honest.)
<checking Google> It must be out there somewhere... Ah!
I knew that I'd read a post from JMS himself that referenced this, and
here it is...
-----------
From: Jms at B5 (jms...@aol.com)
Subject: Re: Harlan Ellison going to court as witness????
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated
Date: 1997/11/29
>Towards the end, in a paragraph beginning "AJ Bielow is working on this
>case,....." it is claimed that Harlan Ellison may be going to court as a
>witness in her favour.
As soon as I read this, I called Harlan (9:10 p.m. Friday night) and he stated
that he is not involved with any Dr. Who project or suit, and that he is not
testifying as a witness in any such situation, and that this is not a true
statment.
jms
-----------
As another reference, Keith Topping wrote on r.a.dw. in '98...
-----------
From: Keith Topping (ke...@tooon.demon.co.uk)
Subject: Re: Karen Mccoy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Date: 1998/04/30
[...] about her net-statement that
should she be taken to court, she would be calling Harlan Ellison as a
character witness, and Harlan's statement via JMS at February's
Gallifrey convention that he certainly *wouldn't* be doing that or
anything like it...
-----------
...So anyone who's believing McCoy's tirade here would do a good job to
research the events via Google/ex-Deja.news.
Doctor TOC
>
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 00:05:36 -0400, Doctor TOC <other...@erols.com>
> took a keyboard, and wrote the following:
>
> >Why she's woken up after four years is anyone's guess.
>
> But has she? why go to the trouble of making yourself unknown if
> you're going to make it clear exactly who you are? Or am I applying
> logic here to a situation that has no logic...?
It's the latter. She's as nutty as they come. Anyone who spouts as many
easily disprovable lies as she did is either mindbuggeringly stupid or
simply really badly wired.