Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

market value of Doctor Who takes a dive

28 views
Skip to first unread message

116...@gmail.com

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 6:08:48 AM4/17/13
to
In Australia, Rupert Murdoch's pay TV network bought a load of popular
BBC shows that were traditionally shown on government free-to-air
channels.
BUT DOCTOR WHO WAS NOT ONE OF THESE.

Keith Cunningham

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 6:32:48 AM4/17/13
to

<116...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9e29fd6d-c3cf-4cf1...@googlegroups.com...
Good. Do we really want Doctor Who associated with Murdoch?


The Doctor

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 8:37:37 AM4/17/13
to
In article <9e29fd6d-c3cf-4cf1...@googlegroups.com>,
That's Murhick for you.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 amnd 53 on Atheism
B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!

Agamemnon

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 11:55:26 AM4/17/13
to

<116...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9e29fd6d-c3cf-4cf1...@googlegroups.com...
Obviously it was too expensive for him considering other networks are paying
a premium to show the new series.



The Doctor

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 12:27:26 PM4/17/13
to
In article <Pb2dnUOtYMByWPPM...@eclipse.net.uk>,
Rupert is bankrupt.

Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 12:59:14 PM4/17/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <Pb2dnUOtYMByWPPM...@eclipse.net.uk>,
> Agamemnon <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>
>><116...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:9e29fd6d-c3cf-4cf1...@googlegroups.com...
>>> In Australia, Rupert Murdoch's pay TV network bought a load of popular
>>> BBC shows that were traditionally shown on government free-to-air
>>> channels.
>>> BUT DOCTOR WHO WAS NOT ONE OF THESE.
>>
>>Obviously it was too expensive for him considering other networks are
>>paying
>>a premium to show the new series.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Rupert is bankrupt.

And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...


Reader in Invisible Writings

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 4:27:09 PM4/17/13
to
As others have remarked, either Dr Who is a liability or it is too
expensive. As being a liability would not appear to be the case it must
be too expensive for him to have exclusive rights.

--
Reader in Invisible Writings
Something to Ponder on!

Your Name

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 5:09:37 PM4/17/13
to
Complete bollocks.

Rupert Murdoch owns (or part owns) Sky TV Australia / New Zealand. Sky TV
Australia / New Zealand owns the free-to-air channel Prime. Prime is
currently showing the latest part-season episodes.

Plus, Sky TV's UKTV channel is also playing Doctor Who episodes (re-runs
and the one Doctor per mmonth anniversary episodes)

Rupert Murdoch HAS bought Doctor Who.

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 5:21:58 PM4/17/13
to
In article <FxAbt.17188$BP1....@fx12.fr7>,
0/10 SW.

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 5:23:37 PM4/17/13
to
In article <YourName-180...@203-118-187-127.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz>,
Thank you for the correction.

Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 6:13:41 PM4/17/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kkn3pm$df$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <FxAbt.17188$BP1....@fx12.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <Pb2dnUOtYMByWPPM...@eclipse.net.uk>,
>>> Agamemnon <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>
>>>><116...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:9e29fd6d-c3cf-4cf1...@googlegroups.com...
>>>>> In Australia, Rupert Murdoch's pay TV network bought a load of popular
>>>>> BBC shows that were traditionally shown on government free-to-air
>>>>> channels.
>>>>> BUT DOCTOR WHO WAS NOT ONE OF THESE.
>>>>
>>>>Obviously it was too expensive for him considering other networks are
>>>>paying
>>>>a premium to show the new series.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Rupert is bankrupt.
>>
>>And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
>>
>>
>
> 0/10 SW.

Murdoch can be described as many things. Bankrupt is not one of them. But go
on then - why don't you explain why you think he's bankrupt?


The Doctor

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 7:09:56 PM4/17/13
to
In article <s8Fbt.17782$BP1....@fx12.fr7>,
Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:kkn3pm$df$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <FxAbt.17188$BP1....@fx12.fr7>,
>> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>> In article <Pb2dnUOtYMByWPPM...@eclipse.net.uk>,
>>>> Agamemnon <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>><116...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:9e29fd6d-c3cf-4cf1...@googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> In Australia, Rupert Murdoch's pay TV network bought a load of popular
>>>>>> BBC shows that were traditionally shown on government free-to-air
>>>>>> channels.
>>>>>> BUT DOCTOR WHO WAS NOT ONE OF THESE.
>>>>>
>>>>>Obviously it was too expensive for him considering other networks are
>>>>>paying
>>>>>a premium to show the new series.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rupert is bankrupt.
>>>
>>>And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 0/10 SW.
>
>Murdoch can be described as many things. Bankrupt is not one of them. But go
>on then - why don't you explain why you think he's bankrupt?
>
>

Morally bankrupt.

Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 12:37:04 PM4/18/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kkna44$6b7$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
No, you said he was bankrupt. Being "bankrupt" is very different to being
"morally bankrupt".

So even though you won't admit to it, you were wrong when you said he was
bankrupt. Now you've changed it to morally bankrupt. Do you know why you
think he's morally bankrupt?


solar penguin

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 2:25:24 PM4/18/13
to

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:14 +0100, Stephen Wilson wrote:

> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>
>> Rupert is bankrupt.
>
> And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...

Dr Johnson already wrote that list years ago.

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 3:38:51 PM4/18/13
to
In article <TiVbt.32171$MR6....@fx21.fr7>,
The Sun

solar penguin

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 4:29:25 PM4/18/13
to

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:09:56 +0000, The Doctor wrote:

> In article <s8Fbt.17782$BP1....@fx12.fr7>, Stephen Wilson
> <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kkn3pm$df$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Rupert is bankrupt.
>>>>
>>>>And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 0/10 SW.
>>
>>Murdoch can be described as many things. Bankrupt is not one of them.
>>But go on then - why don't you explain why you think he's bankrupt?
>>
>>
>>
> Morally bankrupt.

If that's what you meant why didn't you say so?
You should always say what you mean.

Your Name

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 5:04:50 PM4/18/13
to
In article <kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
Actually, Websters published that list as a book decades ago ... they
called it a "Dictionary". ;-)

Your Name

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 5:05:58 PM4/18/13
to
In article <kkpl35$8df$1...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
Because it's far too difficult to post actual sentences that make sense.
It's easier to post nonsense garbage only a few words long ... which is
why I stopped bothering to read his drivel. :-\

solar penguin

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 5:06:21 PM4/18/13
to
Uh, yeah. That's the point I was making with my Dr Johnson reference.

Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 5:56:54 PM4/18/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kkpi4b$4ot$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Nicely explained. No wait, you explained nothing.

Rupert Murdoch owns the Sun newspaper. So what? Are you saying Murdoch is
morally bankrupt because his paper raised �7 million for the "Help for
Heroes" charity? Is he morally bankrupt because the Sun runs a "Free Books
for Schools" promotion and campaign? Are you saying he's morally bankrupt
because Sun reporters won "Reporter of the Year" in 2001, 2004, 2005 and
2008?

In short - how did you work out that Murdoch "morally bankrupt" because of
the Sun?


Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 6:03:07 PM4/18/13
to

"solar penguin" <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me...
Mostly. He did omit the word "sausage" though...


Your Name

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 9:15:41 PM4/18/13
to
In article <kkpn8d$8df$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:04:50 +1200, Your Name wrote:
>
> > In article <kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
> > <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:14 +0100, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> >> > "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >> > news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> >
> >> >> Rupert is bankrupt.
> >> >
> >> > And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
> >>
> >> Dr Johnson already wrote that list years ago.
> >
> > Actually, Websters published that list as a book decades ago ... they
> > called it a "Dictionary". ;-)
>
> Uh, yeah. That's the point I was making with my Dr Johnson reference.

Sorry, never heard of Dr Johnson. Websters and Collins are the two most
famous dictionaries these days ... although probably dictionary.com will
over take them in the near future.

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 10:14:44 PM4/18/13
to
In article <K_Zbt.9007$xs....@fx28.fr7>,
Just like the scandals Rupert is known for?

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 10:15:31 PM4/18/13
to
In article <A4_bt.27775$RJ2....@fx03.fr7>,
Atheists will make mankind into sausages!

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 10:16:24 PM4/18/13
to
In article <YourName-190...@203-118-187-96.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz>,
Oxford still reigns!

Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 19, 2013, 12:24:29 PM4/19/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kkq9ak$qom$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Which scandals is he known for? And how do they show him to be morally
bankrupt?


The Doctor

unread,
Apr 19, 2013, 4:21:43 PM4/19/13
to
In article <5dect.46470$NR6....@fx25.fr7>,
Telephone taps.

Aggedor

unread,
Apr 19, 2013, 4:06:17 AM4/19/13
to

<116...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9e29fd6d-c3cf-4cf1...@googlegroups.com...
> In Australia, Rupert Murdoch's pay TV network bought a load of popular
> BBC shows that were traditionally shown on government free-to-air
> channels.
> BUT DOCTOR WHO WAS NOT ONE OF THESE.

The ABC's current content deal with the BBC ends in mid-2014, so they may
yet lose Doctor Who.


bru...@topmail.co.nz

unread,
Apr 19, 2013, 11:24:09 PM4/19/13
to
One newspaper report said the ABC has a "lifetime agreement" for Doctor Who
and insinuated that is why Foxtel did not take it.
Anyway pay TV in Australia has low market share compared to other affluent
nations, so they will keep trying to siphon programs off FTA TV.

Your Name

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 2:12:42 AM4/20/13
to
In article <9d92d5fb-2735-41f9...@googlegroups.com>,
bru...@topmail.co.nz wrote:
> On Friday, 19 April 2013 16:06:17 UTC+8, Aggedor wrote:
> > <116...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:9e29fd6d-c3cf-4cf1...@googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > In Australia, Rupert Murdoch's pay TV network bought a load of popular
> >
> > > BBC shows that were traditionally shown on government free-to-air
> >
> > > channels.
> >
> > > BUT DOCTOR WHO WAS NOT ONE OF THESE.
> >
> >
> >
> > The ABC's current content deal with the BBC ends in mid-2014, so they may
> >
> > yet lose Doctor Who.
>
> One newspaper report said the ABC has a "lifetime agreement"...
<snip>

That usually just means "while the ink is still wet". ;-)

maffster

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 7:43:19 AM4/20/13
to

Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 9:16:21 AM4/20/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kks90n$ibl$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Wrong. Murdoch didn't tap anyone's phones. He argued that since he ran a
global business of 53,000 employees and that the News of the World was "just
1%" of this, he was not ultimately responsible for what went on at the
tabloid. He added that he and the other top executives had been completely
unaware of the hacking.

Try again.


solar penguin

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 9:39:48 AM4/20/13
to


The Doctor wrote:

> In article <A4_bt.27775$RJ2....@fx03.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >
> >"solar penguin" <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> >news:kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me...
> >>
> >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:14 +0100, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> >>
> >>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >>> news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >>>
> >>>> Rupert is bankrupt.
> >>>
> >>> And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
> >>
> >> Dr Johnson already wrote that list years ago.
> >
> >Mostly. He did omit the word "sausage" though...
> >
> >
>
> Atheists will make mankind into sausages!
> --

Looks like Stephen is right - we _do_ need to add the "sausage" to the
words you don't understand!

Seriously, why do you feel the need to make an irrelevant insult to
atheists in almost every thread?

solar penguin

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 9:42:10 AM4/20/13
to


Your Name wrote:

> In article <kkpn8d$8df$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:04:50 +1200, Your Name wrote:
> >
> > > In article <kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
> > > <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:14 +0100, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> > >> > "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> > >> > news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> > >> >
> > >> >> Rupert is bankrupt.
> > >> >
> > >> > And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
> > >>
> > >> Dr Johnson already wrote that list years ago.
> > >
> > > Actually, Websters published that list as a book decades ago ... they
> > > called it a "Dictionary". ;-)
> >
> > Uh, yeah. That's the point I was making with my Dr Johnson reference.
>
> Sorry, never heard of Dr Johnson.

What do they teach in history class these days!?!

> Websters and Collins are the two most
> famous dictionaries these days ... although probably dictionary.com will
> over take them in the near future.

IIRC Oxford is still the one they use on "Countdown". And of course,
it's now bundled free with Kindle Fire which might help boost its
flagging profile.

Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 10:21:45 AM4/20/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kkq9c3$qr6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <A4_bt.27775$RJ2....@fx03.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"solar penguin" <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>news:kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:14 +0100, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>> news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>
>>>>> Rupert is bankrupt.
>>>>
>>>> And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
>>>
>>> Dr Johnson already wrote that list years ago.
>>
>>Mostly. He did omit the word "sausage" though...
>>
>>
>
> Atheists will make mankind into sausages!

Can't say I remember Blackadder saying that. But I'll take your word for it.
Whatever, it seems to be more the kind of things religious nutters would
prefer doing. Just a few days ago a couple of Russian brothers set off a
bomb at the Boston marathon. The older brother described himself as a "very
religious" non-drinker and non-smoker.


idlehands

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 10:37:12 AM4/20/13
to
Because it makes the idiot feel like a bigshot and attempts to portray
himself as a big man instead of the cowering little boy that he really is.

--


solar penguin

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 11:34:31 AM4/20/13
to
Yeah, good point!

It makes you wonder how weak and insecure are his own beliefs if he
needs to insult others' at every opportunity.

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 3:24:04 PM4/20/13
to
In article <Jywct.25679$to7....@fx26.fr7>,
1%. that 530 employees.

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 3:24:38 PM4/20/13
to
In article <87991b0b-3f8c-4ecf...@o9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
That quotes is from the Doctor - Mind Robber and Masque of Mandragora.

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 3:25:08 PM4/20/13
to
In article <2wxct.52915$U97....@fx31.fr7>,
Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:kkq9c3$qr6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <A4_bt.27775$RJ2....@fx03.fr7>,
>> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"solar penguin" <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:14 +0100, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>> news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rupert is bankrupt.
>>>>>
>>>>> And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
>>>>
>>>> Dr Johnson already wrote that list years ago.
>>>
>>>Mostly. He did omit the word "sausage" though...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Atheists will make mankind into sausages!
>
>Can't say I remember Blackadder saying that. But I'll take your word for it.
>Whatever, it seems to be more the kind of things religious nutters would
>prefer doing. Just a few days ago a couple of Russian brothers set off a
>bomb at the Boston marathon. The older brother described himself as a "very
>religious" non-drinker and non-smoker.
>
>

That's from mind Robber and Masque of Mandragora.

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 3:25:28 PM4/20/13
to
In article <19f11b50-ebdb-412a...@m2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Your Name wrote:
>
>> In article <kkpn8d$8df$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:04:50 +1200, Your Name wrote:
>> >
>> > > In article <kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>> > > <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:14 +0100, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>> > >> > "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> > >> > news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Rupert is bankrupt.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
>> > >>
>> > >> Dr Johnson already wrote that list years ago.
>> > >
>> > > Actually, Websters published that list as a book decades ago ... they
>> > > called it a "Dictionary". ;-)
>> >
>> > Uh, yeah. That's the point I was making with my Dr Johnson reference.
>>
>> Sorry, never heard of Dr Johnson.
>
>What do they teach in history class these days!?!

Blackadder III is on its way.

>
>> Websters and Collins are the two most
>> famous dictionaries these days ... although probably dictionary.com will
>> over take them in the near future.
>
>IIRC Oxford is still the one they use on "Countdown". And of course,
>it's now bundled free with Kindle Fire which might help boost its
>flagging profile.


The Doctor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 3:26:08 PM4/20/13
to
In article <kku917$376$1...@dont-email.me>,
0/10 troll idelbrains.

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 3:26:33 PM4/20/13
to
In article <75709e08-4afb-4a97...@s4g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
Well evil is invading Planet Earth.

idlehands

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 6:16:07 PM4/20/13
to
His only beliefs are what someone else tells him to believe, and even that
is so weak he doesn't dare examine them in fear they could be wrong.

--


The Doctor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 6:20:41 PM4/20/13
to
In article <kkv3tl$25e$1...@dont-email.me>,
idlehands <hidefromu@nospam h u s h.c0m> wrote:
You are no scientist troll idlebrains

Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 7:16:19 PM4/20/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kkuq2k$pnt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <2wxct.52915$U97....@fx31.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kkq9c3$qr6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <A4_bt.27775$RJ2....@fx03.fr7>,
>>> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"solar penguin" <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:14 +0100, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rupert is bankrupt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr Johnson already wrote that list years ago.
>>>>
>>>>Mostly. He did omit the word "sausage" though...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Atheists will make mankind into sausages!
>>
>>Can't say I remember Blackadder saying that. But I'll take your word for
>>it.
>>Whatever, it seems to be more the kind of things religious nutters would
>>prefer doing. Just a few days ago a couple of Russian brothers set off a
>>bomb at the Boston marathon. The older brother described himself as a
>>"very
>>religious" non-drinker and non-smoker.
>>
>>
>
> That's from mind Robber and Masque of Mandragora.

No it's not.


Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 7:17:34 PM4/20/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kkuq0k$phe$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Well done. You can do some basic maths. So what?


The Doctor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 7:26:29 PM4/20/13
to
In article <clFct.124197$FR3....@fx30.fr7>,
Care for an audio clip?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 amnd 53 on Atheism
B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 7:28:06 PM4/20/13
to
In article <nmFct.36446$0W4....@fx10.fr7>,
Like the 2 chechens who just racially profiled all Chechens in the USA?

solar penguin

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 3:21:40 AM4/21/13
to
An audio clip from The Mind Robber and Masque of Mandragora about
Russian brothers setting off a bomb at the Boston marathon? Well, I'd
love to hear that.

But we're still waiting for you to post a clip from The Sensorites
where Susan explains how genetics affects telepathy.

solar penguin

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 3:27:07 AM4/21/13
to


The Doctor wrote:

> In article <87991b0b-3f8c-4ecf...@o9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <A4_bt.27775$RJ2....@fx03.fr7>,
> >> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"solar penguin" <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:kkpdqj$e0s$1...@dont-email.me...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:59:14 +0100, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >> >>> news:kkmihe$dc2$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Rupert is bankrupt.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> And we can add bankrupt to the list of words you don't understand...
> >> >>
> >> >> Dr Johnson already wrote that list years ago.
> >> >
> >> >Mostly. He did omit the word "sausage" though...
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Atheists will make mankind into sausages!
> >> --
> >
> >Looks like Stephen is right - we _do_ need to add the "sausage" to the
> >words you don't understand!
> >
> >Seriously, why do you feel the need to make an irrelevant insult to
> >atheists in almost every thread?
>
> That quotes is from the Doctor - Mind Robber and Masque of Mandragora.
> --


I don't recall the Doctor (or any other character) insulting atheists
in either The Mind Robber or Masque of Mandragora.

And even if he did, it still isn't relevant to the discussion, since
Dr Johnson wasn't an atheist. (Yes, yes, we all know how he famously
refuted a specific point of Bishop Berkeley's theology, but that's not
enough to make him an atheist by modern standards!)

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 8:45:06 AM4/21/13
to
In article <033e7405-f741-41c4...@j14g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
Under atheists, " Sausages, mankinnd will be like sausages"

solar penguin

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 9:25:19 AM4/21/13
to
No, the episodes don't say that about atheists. You've got the
context totally wrong. (So no change there.)


Monsieur Tabernac

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 9:48:30 AM4/21/13
to
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 06:25:19 -0700 (PDT), solar penguin
Anyway, what's wrong with sausages? I love sausages.

Aggedor

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 9:35:18 PM4/20/13
to

<bru...@topmail.co.nz> wrote in message
news:9d92d5fb-2735-41f9...@googlegroups.com...
> On Friday, 19 April 2013 16:06:17 UTC+8, Aggedor wrote:
>> <116...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:9e29fd6d-c3cf-4cf1...@googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > In Australia, Rupert Murdoch's pay TV network bought a load of popular
>>
>> > BBC shows that were traditionally shown on government free-to-air
>>
>> > channels.
>>
>> > BUT DOCTOR WHO WAS NOT ONE OF THESE.
>>
>>
>>
>> The ABC's current content deal with the BBC ends in mid-2014, so they may
>>
>> yet lose Doctor Who.
>
> One newspaper report said the ABC has a "lifetime agreement" for Doctor
> Who
> and insinuated that is why Foxtel did not take it.
> Anyway pay TV in Australia has low market share compared to other affluent
> nations, so they will keep trying to siphon programs off FTA TV.

And pay TV in Australia is expensive. Why pay Murdoch and Telstra to watch
ads interspersed with the occasional TV show or movie when you can get a
Telstra internet account (or better yet, a cheaper rival) and download
ad-free versions of the shows/movies in much higher quality, and watch them
when you want.


Stephen Wilson

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 11:55:44 AM4/21/13
to

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kl0n0i$2bk$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
As usual, you've got things completely mixed up. In the Mind Robber, the
Doctor said that if the Master of Fiction's plans went through then "Mankind
would be like a string of sausages, all the same." Which is quite different
to what you said. And has nothing to do with atheists.


The Doctor

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 4:47:22 PM4/21/13
to
In article <c726e0d9-40c0-4e87...@a3g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
The context is correct <VBG>

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 4:48:34 PM4/21/13
to
In article <a_Tct.39499$JY3....@fx16.fr7>,
Baker and Troughton euses similar lines.

solar penguin

unread,
Apr 22, 2013, 5:34:05 AM4/22/13
to
Is it? Then please explain, with detailed examples, how the context of
both The Mind Robber and Masque of Mandragora involves atheists and Dr
Johnson's dictionary. Because I can't see any connection at all.

solar penguin

unread,
Apr 22, 2013, 5:34:05 AM4/22/13
to

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 22, 2013, 10:07:55 AM4/22/13
to
In article <kl306d$p3b$2...@dont-email.me>,
This isn't an A to B linking ; think of Time Monster.
0 new messages