[OT] Ping Agamemnon!
Peter J Ross
< http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1165809.html?#cutid1>
(Thanks to my friend Pinku Sensei for the URL)
--
PJR :-)
<http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/>
<http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/>
Agamemnon
"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:slrng72to...@pjr.motzarella.org...
> Look, Aggy, you're famous!
>
> < http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1165809.html?#cutid1>
>
> (Thanks to my friend Pinku Sensei for the URL)
He'll be eating his own cock then along with everyone else that doubted me.
--
RTD speaking tongue in cheek admits to walking past in a cameo scene near
the end of "Forrest of the Dead", where the people in the library are
resurrected from the computer's core.
Russell T Davies on This Morning ".... imagine if I walked past in an
episode of Dr Who, I'd never be able to watch that episode again. Talk
about hiding behind the sofa!".
I was right.
Eat your cock Zarbiface and be quick or else the Solar Idiot will get there
first.
solar penguin, time for you to eat Zarbi's cock and don't be slow.
marc_CH, eat pussy Marcella.
Stephen Wilson, eat your cock.
Soze, eat cock.
hulahoop, eat cock
Will Tingle, eat cock
Mr.Smartypants, eat cock
john smith, eat your cock
Ignis Fatuus, eat cock
Diane L., eat your pussy
OM, eat cock
peachy ashie passion, eat pussy
tosh, eat cock
Bazza, star gobbling
J, eat cock
Thor, eat your cock
JordanLund, eat cock
If I've missed anyone out let me know.
Russell T Davies on DW Confidential, E12. "He's changing into a new man.
I've got no idea what happens next. And I'm going to be sitting down next
week watching, as rapt, and as excited, and as in the dark as everyone else.
Honestly."
john smith
"Agamemnon" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
news:h8OdnbtW-baaCezV...@eclipse.net.uk...
>
> "Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message
> news:slrng72to...@pjr.motzarella.org...
>> Look, Aggy, you're famous!
>>
>> < http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1165809.html?#cutid1>
>>
>> (Thanks to my friend Pinku Sensei for the URL)
>
> He'll be eating his own cock then along with everyone else that doubted
> me.
>
>
> --
> RTD speaking tongue in cheek admits to walking past in a cameo scene near
> the end of "Forrest of the Dead", where the people in the library are
> resurrected from the computer's core.
>
> Russell T Davies on This Morning ".... imagine if I walked past in an
> episode of Dr Who, I'd never be able to watch that episode again. Talk
> about hiding behind the sofa!".
>
> I was right.
>
How do any of RTD's (selectively edited) quotes above prove you to be right?
You're not doing a very good job of presenting your evidence, Aggy...
Ignis Fatuus
<agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>
>"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message
>news:slrng72to...@pjr.motzarella.org...
>> Look, Aggy, you're famous!
>>
>> < http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1165809.html?#cutid1>
>>
>> (Thanks to my friend Pinku Sensei for the URL)
>
>He'll be eating his own cock then along with everyone else that doubted me.
Don't take on so. There's nobody here doubts you at all. Everybody can
see you for Exactly what you are - spelled out in your own write.
= IF
Mr.Smartypants
> "Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in messagenews:slrng72to...@pjr.motzarella.org...
>
> > Look, Aggy, you're famous!
>
> > <http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1165809.html?#cutid1>
>
> > (Thanks to my friend Pinku Sensei for the URL)
>
> He'll be eating his own cock then along with everyone else that doubted me.
>
Aggy you can ease up now. You've made your mark. You're famous. You
can kick back and bask in the glow. Just bask in the glow Aggy
.Women will want you now.
marc_CH
>> Look, Aggy, you're famous!
>>
>> < http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1165809.html?#cutid1>
>>
>> (Thanks to my friend Pinku Sensei for the URL)
>
> He'll be eating his own cock then along with everyone else that doubted me.
Oh? And when will that be?
--
marc
"I will eat RTD's cock, assuming it is on offer." -- Aggy
Agamemnon
"marc_CH" <ma...@crumhorn.org> wrote in message
news:6df8pfF...@mid.individual.net...
> Agamemnon wrote:
>
>>> Look, Aggy, you're famous!
>>>
>>> < http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1165809.html?#cutid1>
>>>
>>> (Thanks to my friend Pinku Sensei for the URL)
>>
>> He'll be eating his own cock then along with everyone else that doubted
>> me.
>
Stop quoting out of context you dissembling lying prostitute.
Snarky
> "marc_CH" wrote...
> > Agamemnon wrote:
>
> >>> Look, Aggy, you're famous!
>
> >>> <http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1165809.html?#cutid1>
>
> >>> (Thanks to my friend Pinku Sensei for the URL)
>
> >> He'll be eating his own cock then along with everyone else that doubted
> >> me.
>
>
How is that quoting out of context, Aggie? Marc snipped nothing, but
you snipped him.
Snarky (Oh, yes, it's me again!)
solar penguin
Welcome back Snarky!
Aggy is referring to Marc quoting him in her sig. He really, really
doesn't like being quoted in people's sigs. And he comes up with lots
of really, really quotable nonsense that's just crying out for use in
sigs all the time.
Snarky
> On 12 Jul, 11:41, Snarky wrote:
> > Hail Eris! On Jul 7, 12:55 pm, "Agamemnon" wrote:
>
> > > Stop quoting out of context you dissembling lying prostitute.
>
> > How is that quoting out of context, Aggie? Marc snipped nothing, but
> > you snipped him.
>
> > Snarky (Oh, yes, it's me again!)
>
> Welcome back Snarky!
Hiya!
> Aggy is referring to Marc quoting him in her sig. He really, really
> doesn't like being quoted in people's sigs. And he comes up with lots
> of really, really quotable nonsense that's just crying out for use in
> sigs all the time.
I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
Snarky, demonic
solar penguin
> Hail Eris! On Jul 12, 3:47 am, solar penguin wrote:
>
> > Welcome back Snarky!
>
> Hiya!
I engage with the Snark
every night after dark
in a dreamy delirious fight...
>
> > Aggy is referring to Marc quoting him in her sig. He really, really
> > doesn't like being quoted in people's sigs. And he comes up with lots
> > of really, really quotable nonsense that's just crying out for use in
> > sigs all the time.
>
> I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>
Wait until you see Aggy's weird theories about history and religion.
He believes that every god from every religion really exists. They're
all the ghosts of dead kings apparently (e.g. Zeus's real name when he
was alive was Saasi Tepi), except for the Christian god who's actually
a committee of seven ghosts of dead Pharaohs.
And that's one of Aggy's saner theories. (Sorry, it's not a theory;
it's apparently a "proven fact" because it was "written in ink".)
Snarky
> On 12 Jul, 11:53, wrote:
> > Hail Eris! On Jul 12, 3:47 am, solar penguin wrote:
>
> > > Welcome back Snarky!
>
> > Hiya!
>
> I engage with the Snark
> every night after dark
> in a dreamy delirious fight...
Watch out, I hace Hunting Boojums!
> > > Aggy is referring to Marc quoting him in her sig. He really, really
> > > doesn't like being quoted in people's sigs. And he comes up with lots
> > > of really, really quotable nonsense that's just crying out for use in
> > > sigs all the time.
>
> > I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>
> Wait until you see Aggy's weird theories about history and religion.
> He believes that every god from every religion really exists. They're
> all the ghosts of dead kings apparently (e.g. Zeus's real name when he
> was alive was Saasi Tepi), except for the Christian god who's actually
> a committee of seven ghosts of dead Pharaohs.
>
> And that's one of Aggy's saner theories. (Sorry, it's not a theory;
> it's apparently a "proven fact" because it was "written in ink".)
Ohhhh, my, my, my. Now, while I will say that, as a Pagan, I think all
deities may be real, as an agnostic, I think they may not be. Either
way, there is no proof, beyond what human beings have written about
them, which is only proof that humans have written about them. His
embellishments on "all gods are real" may well make him eligible for
72 very yummy Raisins (virgins, of course). Also, historical
revisionism can get him a Doogie (Grant, not Howser), and there may be
a Wollmann's worth of additional awards in store, especially if he is
inclined to abuse the abuse process. He sounds at least like a (Double-
Doctor) Chung (Fraud of Atlanta, Ga)...His Lits o' Haet, of course, is
de rigeur for any true k00k. I'll soon have RADW d/l'ed on my
desktop's newsreader, so I'll be able to provide the handy-dandy AUK
Kook Appraisal Test for you, as well as Teh Way Of Teh Kook.
Snarky
Porsche Monkey For Life
dribbled:
And here we are -- the test is in my .sig. The nym, BTW, comes from the
kook referenced just above the test. Check out his FAQ, if you're
intrigued.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
The original "Henry Schmidt"; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Do not taunt the Happy Fun Ball. If Happy Fun Ball starts to smoke, run
away and take cover."
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
The PM4L FAQ: http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
================================================
Brad Jesness Memorial Kook Appraisal Test (KAT or KAT Index) v. 5.1 by
Cipher and the a.u.k crew
So, you think you've got a contender, eh? Hard to separate the Kooks
from the mere pains in the ass though. Hopefully this will help you.
Instructions :
In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
Grading scale follows questions.
Have they ever :
1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.
2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.
3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
cancel*
4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".
5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.
6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.
7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.
8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.
9. Made a spelling flame. (*)
10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)
12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
have.
13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
cannot know anything about any other subject.
In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.
2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"
3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
article.
4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.
5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.
6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.
7. Defended a well known kook.
8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.
10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.
11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.
12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')
13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.
In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.
2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.
3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.
4. Mail-bombed anyone.
5. Spammed a newsgroup.
6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.
7. Lost an account due to abuse.
8. Won a kook award.
9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)
(Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
counsel)
10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.
11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.
12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.
13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.
14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?
(*) PalmJob Exception Rule. Cannot be applied to a mere troll's points.
(**) Brad Jesness Factor. Not applicable to BJ, it is expected.
Scale/Rank :
1 - 10 points : Kook Wannabe. Needs to read Grubor's posting history on
dejanews. Your Prospective Kook has much to learn. They may have just
screwed up once or twice.
11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.
26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.
36 - 50 points : Kook cum Laude. Someone is considering writing a FAQ
about your Prospective Kook. Has been nominated for at least one a.u.k
award.
51 + points : Kook Magna cum Laude. Your Prospective Kook has a FAQ.
Your Prospective Kook will eventually win all the big awards. Your
Prospective Kook can leap tall newbies with a single bound.
The Doctor
Welcome back.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
Will Tingle
<9d3ebd73-4e8f-4aec...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> writes
>On 12 Jul, 11:53, wrote:
>
>> Hail Eris! On Jul 12, 3:47 am, solar penguin wrote:
>>
>> > Welcome back Snarky!
>>
>> Hiya!
>
>I engage with the Snark
>every night after dark
>in a dreamy delirious fight...
>
>>
>> > Aggy is referring to Marc quoting him in her sig. He really, really
>> > doesn't like being quoted in people's sigs. And he comes up with lots
>> > of really, really quotable nonsense that's just crying out for use in
>> > sigs all the time.
>>
>> I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>>
>
>Wait until you see Aggy's weird theories about history and religion.
>He believes that every god from every religion really exists. They're
>all the ghosts of dead kings apparently (e.g. Zeus's real name when he
>was alive was Saasi Tepi), except for the Christian god who's actually
>a committee of seven ghosts of dead Pharaohs.
Also that referring to Tosh as "Japbird" isn't racist, but that calling
Aggy a "Greek idiot" is...
>
>And that's one of Aggy's saner theories. (Sorry, it's not a theory;
>it's apparently a "proven fact" because it was "written in ink".)
For one of Aggy's greatest hits, see this thread:
In which he INSISTS that RTD was in "Forest of the dead" - he later
claimed that RTD saying ".... If I walked past in an episode of Dr Who,
I'd never be able to watch that episode again. Talk about hiding
behind the sofa!" proves it ?!?
--
Remeber - anyone who accuses me of quoting them after I say this, is
identifying themseves as "Joblessgreekvirgin":
"GET AND EDUCATION"
"LEAR SOME COMPREHENSION SKILLS"
"I will eat RTD's cock, assuming it is on offer."
- Joblessgreekvirgin, rec.arts.drwho
Will Tingle
Remove YOUR_PANTS to e-mail
The Secretary of HomIntern
> solar penguin writes
>>On 12 Jul, 11:53, Snarky wrote:
>>> Hail Eris! On Jul 12, 3:47 am, solar penguin wrote:
>>>
>>> > Welcome back Snarky!
>>>
>>> Hiya!
>>
>>I engage with the Snark
>>every night after dark
>>in a dreamy delirious fight...
>>
>>> > Aggy is referring to Marc quoting him in her sig. He really, really
>>> > doesn't like being quoted in people's sigs. And he comes up with
>>> > lots of really, really quotable nonsense that's just crying out for
>>> > use in sigs all the time.
>>>
>>> I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>>>
>>>
>>Wait until you see Aggy's weird theories about history and religion. He
>>believes that every god from every religion really exists. They're all
>>the ghosts of dead kings apparently (e.g. Zeus's real name when he was
>>alive was Saasi Tepi), except for the Christian god who's actually a
>>committee of seven ghosts of dead Pharaohs.
>
> Also that referring to Tosh as "Japbird" isn't racist, but that calling
> Aggy a "Greek idiot" is...
"Race" isn't even a meaningful term, in that context -- never mind that
*nationalities* =/= "race", the genetic difference between any two humans
on the planet is so vanishingly slight as to render that four-letter word
meaningless.
>>And that's one of Aggy's saner theories. (Sorry, it's not a theory; it's
>>apparently a "proven fact" because it was "written in ink".)
>
> For one of Aggy's greatest hits, see this thread:
>
> http://snipurl.com/2xcta
>
> In which he INSISTS that RTD was in "Forest of the dead" - he later
> claimed that RTD saying ".... If I walked past in an episode of Dr Who,
> I'd never be able to watch that episode again. Talk about hiding behind
> the sofa!" proves it ?!?
Thank you for providing that evidence. It's exactly what was needed.
Here's Teh Way that I promised...
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant Cock-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Rotate email munge 13 times to get real addy
"The moral of the story is: Kill the parents kill the children."
"What a lame copycat you are." -- the PorchMonkey4Life, posting as "The
Secretary of HomIntern", in MID: <UkdTh.2573$Z66.747@trnddc06>,
re-defines irony yet again.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Old politicalcompass.org:
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
New political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -6.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.67
Odd. I seem to be swaying.
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<Ie2Qe.8199$wb5....@bignews1.bellsouth.net>
Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
http://www.lowgenius.net/kookway.htm
TEH WAY OF THE K00K
Never learn from your mistakes.
Always practice your mistakes; you may get them right.
Always pick on those smarter and tougher than you.
Always believe that only you know the TRVTH.
Never allow logic or reason get in the way of a good k00k.
When being overwhelmed by logic and reason: k00ksuit!
If you are going to be wrong, do it at the top of your lungs.
When caught in a lie: LIE!
When in doubt: Order the Crab Won Ton
Plagiarism is your friend. Use it.
Whenever contradicted; morph, start calling people names, and make false
accusations. Include the children of your target in your allegations,
even if they don't have any.
(06-Jun-05) When nobody else will listen, post to your own fan group.
(06-Jun-05) Obviously, since you have your own fan group, this must mean
that you have fans. Post prolifically to your fan group - you wouldn't
want to disappoint them!
(10-May-2005)Everyone reads usenet. Approval here means approval
everywhere.
Post numerous blank posts, or posts containing only a message id.
Post numerous copy&paste web articles from crackerpot websites.
Never forget to call kookologists "k00ks."
If there are several, call them "sockpuppets" too
When all else fails, accuse various and sundry kookologists of e-mailing
viruses to you. This is a sure-fire method of garnering sympathy and
ensuring that the General Public will always see things your way. An
especially effective sub-strategy here is to accuse them of infecting
you with the 'Sasser' worm via e-mail.
Quote notorious scientists or writers - it makes it look as if they
approve the drivel you are writing!
(9-Jul-05) Anytime your computer is infected with a virus, bogged down
by spyware, attacked over your internet connection, or otherwise suffers
from preventable problems, government agencies are responsible and are
trying to silence you and are monitoring your computer files.
Ignore all traffic signs and feel free to trespass, you don't have to
obey any rules.
Scare your enemies with lawsuits, police escorts and whines.
Always back up your empty (albeit noisy) threats with phony LARTs, false
police reports, and harassing letters to the FBI and other gubbermint
agencies.
Be vigilant in your redundancy. The more you repeat yourself, the more
likely others will believe you!
If you can't find anyone as crazy as yourself to support you in the
flamewars you start with the normal population, create sock puppets and
use anonymous remailers that shamelessly hang on every word you write.
(17-Mar-05) When dealing with law enforcement, remember that it is they
who have the problem, not you. Be sure to inform them of this at every
available opportunity, as they will surely appreciate your constructive
criticism. Be sure to make them aware that YOU KNOW YOUR RIGHTS! ("The
cops like that, when people know their rights. That way they don't have
to read them to you on the way to the station." - George Carlin)
The more your fake personalities adulate you, the more respect you'll
get!
When confronted with a reality that you don't like: Announce loudly
that you are departing, never to return as long as there's an Internet.
Come back in three or four days and claim you were drunk, hacked,
abducted by alience, or forged. Alternately you can just not even
mention your prior departure, and if anyone asks you about it, either
ignore them or respond with something along the lines of "YOUR NOT THE
BOSS OF ME! *PLONK*!" People really know you mean business then.
Always remain clueproof.
(20-Mar-05) Anyone who does not believe that you are the reincarnation
of [$DEITY_OR_PROPHET] is obviously an infidel lacking in faith whose
soul in in peril of everlasting damnation.
When responding to one line challenges, post paragraphs of rants and
screed in response.
Incoherency is not a roadblock to poasting.
Neither is illiteracy.
Delusions poasted often enough become fact.
Claim you will destroy <insert newsfroup> for attacking you.
When spnaked, send cmsg for Fanboi newsfroup(s).
Find your Lame, Use your Lame, Be your Lame!
Post Edit when the TRVTH hurts.
Always sneck the offending newsfroups.
Always poast pictures of yourself so you can be admired in all your k00ky
glory.
Always accuse others of the very acts you are guilty of.
Post lots of boasts about your high IQ and incredible talents.
(20-Mar-05) If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
Anybody who fails to understand this is engaged in a deliberate campaign
of misinformation and character assassination.
Always <plonk> somebody just before replying the plonkee!
The k00k considers itself the most intelligent person in any
conversation, possibly on the planet. Other people are benighted and
ignorant, and have been waiting their whole lives for the k00k to rescue
them from intellectual darkness.
Write a self-published book and claim it a success. Bonus points for
comparing it to "Mein Kampf" and/or the Bible.
Declare yourself equal to a deity of your choice.
Claim that you've come from other planets.
Claim thousands of past lives.
Frothing complaints carry far more weight when you send them from
"legal@" some domain.
Nothing strikes terror into the hearts of your detractors more than
telling them that you're archiving their messages for possible use in
the future.
Never forget that everyone else posting to Usenet is a paid
disinformation agent looking to discredit you.
Usenet is governed by US law. If a poster in Romania killfiles you, he's
obviously violating your 1st Amendment rights and can be sued.
Every news admin in the world hangs out in NANAU, and they're just dying
to nuke the account of that meanyhead who just called you "fucknozzle".
Drop 'em a line - that's what they're there for, after all.
AUK will be closed down. Just you wait and see.
They've nuked hundreds of accounts in the name of free speech and
*yours* will be next.
The k00k will, without any trace of irony, lie, manipulate, impersonate,
censor, and declare themselves powerful in ways ranging from the ability
to have an account shut down to being God Herself, in order to convince
people that they are not liars, manipulators, censors, or insane.
Abuse women while telling how many hundreds you've loved. Nevermind that
you're one ugly motherfucker and that there were 30,000 femininas that
thought you were a scumbag with bad teeth.
Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not
require proof.
Do not neglect to poast your responses to forums that the originator
doesn't read. This will make the people in that forum very impressed
with how you tear him to shreds without him being able to respond. They
like it even better if you are off-topic for that forum.
Keep in mind that lack of evidence supporting your konspiracy theory
actually _is_ evidence, of how effective the konspiracy is in hiding.
(06-Oct-05) When spanked, always retreat to the safety of the Ad
Hominem.
(04-Aug-2005) When spanked mercilessly for days on end, proving with
each poast just what an illiterate and ignorant fool you are, ALWAYS
claim ownership of [person(s),froup(s)]. This works on so many levels.
It inspires dread in your opponents that they will no longer be able to
poast in their home froup and that they will eventually have to pay
rent, to name just two.
Any problems with your poasts are the fault of the konspirators, who are
trying to stop you from preventing the extinction of humanity.
Konspiracies that are able to subvert whole governments are always unable
to silence konspiracy ko0ks.
The entire United States government is willing to spend millions of
dollars for the sole purpose of harassing you.
Hollywood is making movies based on your personal life.
Do not consult psychiatrists or other mental health professionals. They
are part of the konspiracy, and will sedate you and lock you away and
keep you drugged if you tell them the truth.
Numerology and Astrology are respectable sciences and are useful for
proving your case.
Everyone is Tim Hill, or David Green, or...
There is a fine line between trolling and kookery. Find that line and
cross it repeatedly. When you are killfiled and/or LARTed for net.abuse
as a result, claim victory. If you lose multiple accounts, this merely
proves that you are indeed a world-class troll, with a black-belt in
manipulation.
If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed. If
they respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more obsessed.
Publishing people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any dignity
is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet information
stores, and absolutely not to be fucked with.
Everyone is out to get you. You can put a stop to this by telling
everyone that they're out to get you at every available opportunity.
You are the only sane one.
Those that give you a hard time about morally bankrupt things you
yourself admit to are just persecutioners of the new inquisition.
Yelling in all caps and cursing at your detractors is debate. Your
detractors laughing at you with sarcastic remarks is obvious anger and
jealousy.
If doing something results in the loss of your account, legal hassles,
or blunt trauma injury, do it again. It always works better the second
time.
Asterisks, lots and lots of Asterisks.
Poking holes in kookscreed is stalking, and is a felony.
K00ks LOVE to "connect the dots". They are, of course, dots that only
the k00k can see.
"They laughed at Einstein, too!"
...with thanks to Aratzio, Dr. Flonkenstein, Dan Baldwin, Cujo, CJ
Osterwald, Jade, Bookman, and John Henry, of AUK. Meow. Original thread
at http://tinyurl.com/3fsho - some posts may not appear due to
x-no-archive headers. The spelling mistakes are intentional, dolt.
pbo...@aol.com
> Look, Aggy, you're famous!
>
> <http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1165809.html?#cutid1>
>
> (Thanks to my friend Pinku Sensei for the URL)
Hehe, that was a fun trip down memory lane. And some gems I hadn't run
across. Incidentally, SP, I hope you added "If" to the list after
Aggy's spectacular incomprehension of RTD's denial.
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
You've missed some real Aggy gems over the years, Snarky.
For instance, there's Aggy's conviction that, prior to some
indeterminate point in or around the 18th Century, all drama was based
on historical characters and events. This of course includes the works
of Shakespeare in their entirety. He can prove, for instance, that
Caliban really existed and that the events of the Tempest really took
place on a magic island because there was once a Duke of Milan called
Prospero, never mind that nothing in his history matches the story in
any substantive way (one of Aggy's cherished notions is that if a
character in a play or other written text from the past is the same as
that of a historical character, or if not the same then bears a
passing resemblance, or failing that has at least one vowel in common,
then they must be the same person).
Othello - you know, the Moorish guy - was in reality a Venetian-born
governer with an entirely different name, mostly because he happened
to live in what was later styled Othello's castle (oh, and if places
are named after fictional characters, those characters must actually
have been historical and associated with those characters - so the
Tomb of Osiris must really be the tomb of Osiris, even though the
association was never made before the 17th Century AD).
Titus Andronicus is a good one - apparently he's the Emperor Titus
(the fact that he was never emperor in the play is explained by
Shakespeare being so lousy at history that he found about about this
historical emperor called Titus but didn't realise he became emperor)
and the emperor in the play, Saturnius, the Emperor Vespasian, despite
the relationship of the two and their stories being entirely
different. The play's supporting characters are random Roman
dignitaries who happened to share first names with the ones in the
play, culled from various points in Roman history before and after
Titus lived (because Shakespeare was so bad at history, naturally he
dug out these obscure figures but had no idea when they lived).
I can't remember if anyone dared to ask him who the characters in
Midsummer Night's Dream were in reality. I think he ignored the
question.
Then there's Aggy's wonderful argument that there's no such thing as
an oral tradition. The logic? All the oral traditions we know about
have been written down by someone, so they can't be oral traditions -
and ones we don't know about can't possibly exist or have ever
existed.
And his take on etymology has to be read to be believed. He invents
stupid words like 'kolofiliac' and 'idiowhatnotiensis' because he
believes words only mean exactly what the combination of the source
words do in the original language - so 'homosexual' just means 'same
sex' (Aggy claims the etymology of 'homo' changed from the Roman for
'man' to the Greek for 'same' because someone on Usenet told him so -
an impeccable source if ever there was one). For some reason, however,
this reasoning doesn't apply to such favourite words of Aggy's as
poppycock (lit: opiate-producing flower's male chicken) or codswallop
(lit: to hit with a big fish).
Then there's his conviction that the word Earth (and, oddly, the word
bread) comes from Beruth, a Phoenician nature goddess, because the
words look similar to Aggy (Beruth was actually pronounced closer to
"Beirut", the city named after her) and have a connection with the
planet, and words that mean more or less the same thing must be
related in Aggy's world.
Phil
Agamemnon
"Will Tingle" <Will@YOUR_PANTSwillsbedroom.co.uk> wrote in message
news:gucBAprR...@willsbedroom.freeserve.co.uk...
> In message
> <9d3ebd73-4e8f-4aec...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> writes
>>On 12 Jul, 11:53, wrote:
>>
>>> Hail Eris! On Jul 12, 3:47 am, solar penguin wrote:
>>>
>>> > Welcome back Snarky!
>>>
>>> Hiya!
>>
>>I engage with the Snark
>>every night after dark
>>in a dreamy delirious fight...
>>
>>>
>>> > Aggy is referring to Marc quoting him in her sig. He really, really
>>> > doesn't like being quoted in people's sigs. And he comes up with lots
>>> > of really, really quotable nonsense that's just crying out for use in
>>> > sigs all the time.
>>>
>>> I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>>>
>>
>>Wait until you see Aggy's weird theories about history and religion.
>>He believes that every god from every religion really exists. They're
>>all the ghosts of dead kings apparently (e.g. Zeus's real name when he
>>was alive was Saasi Tepi), except for the Christian god who's actually
>>a committee of seven ghosts of dead Pharaohs.
>
Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling lying
racist troll.
Will Tingle
<cf073c6b-8726-4fda...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>,
"pbo...@aol.com" <pbo...@aol.com> writes
>On 12 Jul, 11:53, Snarky <popesna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>
>You've missed some real Aggy gems over the years, Snarky.
Oh, and that the "Digital Millennium Copyright Act" says that copyright
holders must not use any form of copy protection, and that if they do
they have to facilitate, at their expense, removal of such protection,
so that you can make as many copies as you like.
Also that the DMCA, despite being a US law, forms part of British common
law.
Oh, and that Common Law IS NOT based on case law (despite being told by
actual lawyers that it is).
--
Remeber - anyone who accuses me of quoting them after I say this, is
identifying themseves as "Joblessgreekvirgin":
"GET AND EDUCATION"
"LEAR SOME COMPREHENSION SKILLS"
"I will eat RTD's cock, assuming it is on offer."
marc_CH
> I can't remember if anyone dared to ask him who the characters in
> Midsummer Night's Dream were in reality. I think he ignored the
> question.
Not surprised. Isn't there a character in there called 'Bottom'?
Poster@poster.com Top Poster
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g5a9vo$6ej$5...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
screamed:
> "Will Tingle" wrote...
>> solar penguin writes
>>>On 12 Jul, 11:53, wrote:
>>>> Hail Eris! On Jul 12, 3:47 am, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Welcome back Snarky!
>>>>
>>>> Hiya!
>>>
>>>I engage with the Snark
>>>every night after dark
>>>in a dreamy delirious fight...
>>>
>>>> > Aggy is referring to Marc quoting him in her sig. He really, really
>>>> > doesn't like being quoted in people's sigs. And he comes up with
>>>> > lots of really, really quotable nonsense that's just crying out for
>>>> > use in sigs all the time.
>>>>
>>>> I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>>>
>>>Wait until you see Aggy's weird theories about history and religion. He
>>>believes that every god from every religion really exists. They're all
>>>the ghosts of dead kings apparently (e.g. Zeus's real name when he was
>>>alive was Saasi Tepi), except for the Christian god who's actually a
>>>committee of seven ghosts of dead Pharaohs.
>
> Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling
> lying racist troll.
Um, "dissembling lying"?
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5; Gutter Chix0r #17
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition; Official Chung Demon
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2; AUK Hate Machine Cog #19
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Computers, like cats, can operate crossdimensionally; the trick is in
getting them to do what you want."
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
"I'll be long gone before some smart person ever figures out what
happened inside this Oval Office." --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.,
May 12, 2008
"6. Who is a net.giggler?" -- Bloxy's "Monkay", that's who. Message-ID:
<DC6BBA72...@demon.co.uk>
"'I find this genetic sequence all the way down the evolutionary
ladder,' he says. 'The major significance of this protein is that it may
be a communication line between the nucleus and the mitochondria.'" --
Andrew B. Chung, from
http://gtalumni.org/Publications/magazine/win91/chung.html
"Pot...kettle...so black it picks cotton." -- But Alex "Dink" Cain isn't
racist at all, oh no. Not him. Why, some of his best friends are porch
monkeys. I'll bet. Message-ID: <397FCB...@hotmail.com>
"You think I don't know this? What gives you the right to speak as if
you have authority over me? You have none. I like his use of the words
'wanton woman'. They are biblical. Maybe there is some hope for k man
after all. You? There is no hope for you at all you freak of nature. Go
back to the hole you came out of." -- Atlanta Olympiada Kane "knows"
Kadaitcha Man was referring to me, but addressed him as though he was
referring to himself, then foamed all over me, in Message-ID:
<45e1f82a$0$16335$8826...@free.teranews.com>
"No effort at all c*cksucking you, b1tch." -- At last, the Monkey-man
comes out of the closet, in MID: <aXkth.3535$QE6.1902@trnddc02>
http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php
"This is a sandwich made by a Spam Witch. You know why Spam Witches
can't starve if they're at the beach? Because they can always eat the
sand which is there." -- Spam Witch sammich, from The Kingdom of
Loathing
http://www.runescape.com/
No one expects the Fannish Inquisition!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_of_the_Holy_Pretzel/join
Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet & Usenet Terrorist
Pretzel
"i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop
Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID:
<1253073.6...@unixd0rk.com>
"What are marijuana tablets?"
"When logic and proportion
Have fallen softly dead
And the White Knight is talking backwards
And the Red Queen's 'off with her head!'
Remember what the dormouse said:
'Feed your head
Feed your head
Feed your head'"
-- "White Rabbit", Jefferson Airplane
I own "James C Cracked is God!!!":
MID: <1161060410.7...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
"Chips on you dud, you got bugged for being near me, Viruses transmit
that way you know." -- Blooey: Master of the Autoflame. Message-ID:
<4556A926...@pharae.org>
"The nonsense screeds you compose and post to usenet lack any kind of
coherent and rational meaning whatsoever, and are composed of random
bits and pieces stolen from mythology, science fiction, religion, comic
books, etc., placed into a blender, and the switch turned to the highest
setting.
About every other screed has droppings of death threats, racial
bigotry, laughably false prophesies of gloom and doom, and inane
attempts to extort money. These bland, meaningless, pulpy messes are
then trowled into usenet; identical or nearly identical screeds are
repeated ad nauseum." -- Art Deco had to clean up bits of Warhol for
days after using the Hammer on him
"Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a
light bulb?
A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision
to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are
giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon.
"Outlaw amateur assassins!" -- Chiun
"Property is theft."
-- P. J. Proudhon
"Property is liberty."
-- P. J. Proudhon
"Property is impossible."
-- P. J. Proudhon
"Etymology:
Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum
Argumentum : putrefaction of argument.
"Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\
a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.]
Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or
caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to
Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID: <a3svh.d...@news.alt.net>
"I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee
William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID:
12ggt3q...@corp.supernews.com
"Red meat won't hurt you. Fuzzy, blue-green meat will."
-- Zog the etc., in alt.discordia (correct
as needed)
"may you live to whatever age you'd like to." -- Dave Hillstrom,
in alt.discordia
"We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the
child at play." -- Heraclitus
"And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet,
and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has
more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate.
The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm
giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy
former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or
working, in MID: <1159389579....@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
"I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest
moment, in MID: <0h59i25ejlthqeeit...@4ax.com>
"But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making
almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it.
See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I
know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil
and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and
that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and
progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch.
"In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock
it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and
let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never
saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He
never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of
thousands as "just a comma" in world history.
"Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford,
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/gate/archive/2006/10/11/
notes101106.DTL&nl=fix
http://tinyurl.com/kusmr
The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
screamed:
Well, on the bright side, I've become acquainted with a wide variety of
net.kooks, and have also become, according to one of those kooks (the
PM4L, as it happens), a "net.legend"...Anyway, thanks for the info, it's
hilarious.
The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
screamed:
> "pbo...@aol.com" writes
>>On 12 Jul, 11:53, Snarky wrote:
>
>>> I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>>
>>You've missed some real Aggy gems over the years, Snarky.
>
> Oh, and that the "Digital Millennium Copyright Act" says that copyright
> holders must not use any form of copy protection, and that if they do they
> have to facilitate, at their expense, removal of such protection, so that
> you can make as many copies as you like.
>
> Also that the DMCA, despite being a US law, forms part of British common
> law.
>
> Oh, and that Common Law IS NOT based on case law (despite being told by
> actual lawyers that it is).
OK, will one of you (Phil, Will, Paul, Marc, whoever actually knows the
scoop on him) go do the test in the .sig belonging to my "Porsche Monkey
For Life" nym? And x-poast it to AUK, if you don't mind.
The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
screamed:
> Do you fancy him
If he did, he'd never admit it -- he's as "straight" as Aggie.
Agamemnon
> pbo...@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I can't remember if anyone dared to ask him who the characters in
>> Midsummer Night's Dream were in reality. I think he ignored the
>> question.
>
> Not surprised. Isn't there a character in there called 'Bottom'?
>
Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling lying
troll.
Agamemnon
> In message
> <cf073c6b-8726-4fda...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>,
> "pbo...@aol.com" <pbo...@aol.com> writes
>>On 12 Jul, 11:53, Snarky <popesna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>>
>>You've missed some real Aggy gems over the years, Snarky.
>
Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling lying
racist troll.
pbo...@aol.com
wrote:
> In message
> <cf073c6b-8726-4fda-8430-69e89405f...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>,
> "pbow...@aol.com" <pbow...@aol.com> writes
>
> >On 12 Jul, 11:53, Snarky <popesna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I can just *tell* we're going to get on famously.
>
> >You've missed some real Aggy gems over the years, Snarky.
>
> Oh, and that the "Digital Millennium Copyright Act" says that copyright
> holders must not use any form of copy protection, and that if they do
> they have to facilitate, at their expense, removal of such protection,
> so that you can make as many copies as you like.
>
> Also that the DMCA, despite being a US law, forms part of British common
> law.
Huh? Hadn't run across any of that.
> Oh, and that Common Law IS NOT based on case law (despite being told by
> actual lawyers that it is).
It is.
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
This is classic Aggy. He honestly seems to think that it makes him
seem clever rather than unable to use English. He still won't explain
what an honest dissembler would be. Another favourite of his is
"mentally deranged" - and guess what, he's silent when asked what
being physically deranged would entail.
Phil
solar penguin
> I can't remember if anyone dared to ask him who the characters in
> Midsummer Night's Dream were in reality. I think he ignored the
> question.
>
I asked. And he tried to wriggle out of the question. As usual.
solar penguin
On 13 Jul, 02:49, The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity wrote:
>
> Well, on the bright side, I've become acquainted with a wide variety of
> net.kooks, and have also become, according to one of those kooks (the
> PM4L, as it happens), a "net.legend"...Anyway, thanks for the info, it's
> hilarious.
>
There's more. Aggy manages to be both homophobic and heterophobic at
the same time, hating gay men and sexually active straight women.
Apparently sex for women should be a brutish, unpleasant, degrading
experience that they only endure to please their husbands. And they
should be far, far too ashamed and disgusted to talk about it
afterwards.
In Aggy's world, any woman who actually enjoys sex and likes to have
it for pleasure is nothing more than a filthy whore. (Never mind that
in real life whores don't have sex purely for pleasure, but for a very
different reason! Real life and Aggy aren't even on nodding terms.)
The only "cure" for such women is to rape them, beat them, flay them
alive, and them dump then in the gutter, to show them what proper sex
_should_ be like.
As for gay sex, Aggy doesn't approve of it because it somehow reminds
him of bestiality. None of us quite understand how it reminds him,
but then Aggy is _very_ obsessed with bestiality. _Everything_
reminds him of it. He's convinced that his neighbour's cat wants to
have sex with him because he's "an alpha male". (As he would say,
"Yer right!") He also judges how attractive people are by which
animals they remind him of. (Apparently, the hamster is the least
attractive to him!)
Fortunately, Aggy has a strong moral sense. Although just like every
man in the world, he regularly gets desires to have sex with animals
and other men's arses, but he _never_ gives in to these urges, because
he's read ancient Greek philosophers who argued that sex for pure
pleasure instead of reproduction was illogical and therefore morally
wrong.
Aggy refuses to accept that most men _don't_ get these urges in the
first place, or the fact that he gets them makes him a closet gay/
bestophile.
Like I said, his crackpot theories about the ghosts of gods are among
his saner ideas...
JanBen Hëlmüt
(in article <pan.2008.07.12....@bisexuals.for.lgbt.freedom>):
>
> Thank you for providing that evidence. It's exactly what was needed.
> Here's Teh Way that I promised...
>
>
Yeah......good luck with that.
--
I feel it flowing through my veins, a poison fighting to gain possession of
my body ... I feel numb, my mind is fuzzy and my vision blurred ... I hate
what is happening but I cannot help but be excited at the thought of this
transformation ... The Troll of depravity is coming out "help me"
pbo...@aol.com
Don't forget the best bit - when describing animal behaviour, Aggy
brought up the idea of a dolphin putting its penis in a human's hand
as though this was a common, everyday occurrence.
Phil
Will Tingle
<pan.2008.07.13....@lucifer.the.great.beast.666.or.is.it.616>
, The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
>OK, will one of you (Phil, Will, Paul, Marc, whoever actually knows the
>scoop on him) go do the test in the .sig belonging to my "Porsche Monkey
>For Life" nym? And x-poast it to AUK, if you don't mind.
I had a quick look at it, but haven't been here long enough to know that
all my answers would be reliable.
Will Tingle
<1c803a73-5aa2-47fc...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
"pbo...@aol.com" <pbo...@aol.com> writes
>> Oh, and that the "Digital Millennium Copyright Act" says that copyright
>> holders must not use any form of copy protection, and that if they do
>> they have to facilitate, at their expense, removal of such protection,
>> so that you can make as many copies as you like.
>>
>> Also that the DMCA, despite being a US law, forms part of British common
>> law.
>
>Huh? Hadn't run across any of that.
somewhere buried in this thread:
>
>> Oh, and that Common Law IS NOT based on case law (despite being told by
>> actual lawyers that it is).
>
>It is.
I know that, you know that, everyone here knows it. Except Aggy - Aggy
seems to think that common law is what we use when there's no
legislation or case law in an area, therefore cannot be based on case
law, and is instead based on whatever Aggy thinks it should be,
including, but not limited to, foreign laws which he likes the sound of
his own interpretation of...
Mr.Smartypants
Well, for Aggy it probably is.
Will Tingle
<ma...@crumhorn.org> writes
>pbo...@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I can't remember if anyone dared to ask him who the characters in
>> Midsummer Night's Dream were in reality. I think he ignored the
>> question.
>
>Not surprised. Isn't there a character in there called 'Bottom'?
>
Probably based on one of Aggy's ancestors...
--
Remeber - anyone who accuses me of quoting them after I say this, is
identifying themseves as "Joblessgreekvirgin":
"GET AND EDUCATION"
"LEAR SOME COMPREHENSION SKILLS"
"I will eat RTD's cock, assuming it is on offer."
Will Tingle
<78233462-75bc-47ea...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> writes
>Although [...] he regularly gets desires to have sex with animals and
>other men's arses
WOW - I missed that one - what thread was THAT in?
The Demon of Mockery
> solar penguin writes
>
> >Although [...] he regularly gets desires to have sex with animals and
> >other men's arses
>
> WOW - I missed that one - what thread was THAT in?
See my nomination post for KOTM for the skinny. You may second, if you
choose -- any non-KOTM winner (certain other awards also exclude one)
can nominate, second, or vote.
Snarky
pbo...@aol.com
wrote:
> In message
> <78233462-75bc-47ea-8794-b98da40c4...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> solar penguin <solar.peng...@googlemail.com> writes
>
> >Although [...] he regularly gets desires to have sex with animals and
> >other men's arses
>
> WOW - I missed that one - what thread was THAT in?
Can't remember the name, but it was a couple of years ago now. Aggy
was trying to explain the value of morality by insisting that it was
morality that restrained people from having sex with members of the
same sex or animals. When I pointed out that most people have no
inclination to have sex with animals, he responded "What? It's
morality that stops them doing so" - plainly he was new to the whole
"not desiring sex with animals" angle.
Phil
Porsche Monkey For Life
pbo...@aol.com dribbled:
So would you like to fill out this test for Aggie...?
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
The original "Henry Schmidt"; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Do not taunt the Happy Fun Ball. If Happy Fun Ball starts to smoke, run
away and take cover."
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
The PM4L FAQ: http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
================================================
Brad Jesness Memorial Kook Appraisal Test (KAT or KAT Index) v. 5.1 by
Cipher and the a.u.k crew
So, you think you've got a contender, eh? Hard to separate the Kooks
from the mere pains in the ass though. Hopefully this will help you.
Instructions :
In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
Grading scale follows questions.
Have they ever :
1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.
2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.
3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
cancel*
4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".
5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.
6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.
7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.
8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.
9. Made a spelling flame. (*)
10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)
12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
have.
13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
cannot know anything about any other subject.
In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.
2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"
3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
article.
4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.
5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.
6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.
7. Defended a well known kook.
8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.
10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.
11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.
12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')
13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.
In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.
2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.
3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.
4. Mail-bombed anyone.
5. Spammed a newsgroup.
6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.
7. Lost an account due to abuse.
8. Won a kook award.
9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)
(Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
counsel)
10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.
11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.
12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.
13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.
14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?
(*) PalmJob Exception Rule. Cannot be applied to a mere troll's points.
(**) Brad Jesness Factor. Not applicable to BJ, it is expected.
Scale/Rank :
1 - 10 points : Kook Wannabe. Needs to read Grubor's posting history on
dejanews. Your Prospective Kook has much to learn. They may have just
screwed up once or twice.
11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.
26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.
36 - 50 points : Kook cum Laude. Someone is considering writing a FAQ
about your Prospective Kook. Has been nominated for at least one a.u.k
award.
51 + points : Kook Magna cum Laude. Your Prospective Kook has a FAQ.
Your Prospective Kook will eventually win all the big awards. Your
Prospective Kook can leap tall newbies with a single bound.
The Face of Po
Porsche Monkey For Life got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> And here we are -- the test is in my .sig. The nym, BTW, comes from the
> kook referenced just above the test. Check out his FAQ, if you're
> intrigued.
>
[...]
>
> Instructions :
> In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
> answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
> occurrences.
Going on what I've seen of him in radw, Agado barely scores at all.
Perhaps readers who've followed him to other groups can add more
examples, but the only one I'm certain of is...
> 10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
This entry could have been written especially for him. Here are some of the
highlights:
"IGNORANT SHOT FOR BRIANS!"
(in the aforementioned "all drama was based on real history" debate)
<FoidndS1VIHGGODa...@eclipse.net.uk>
"BLOODY HELL !!!! THE SCENES FROM THE TV SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE
FIRST PLACE AND IF THE OTHER SCENES OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN LOCATIONS HAD TO BE
INCLUDED IS SHOULD THE SHOULD HAVE BEEN CUT IN, IN DOCKLANDS."
(the context helps only slightly)
<OsOdnfadY-X...@pipex.net>
"GET IT YOU IGNORANT? [...] GET AN EDUCATION YOU IGNORANT IMBECILE!"
(while giving detailed instructions on how to edit the gay propaganda out of a
downloaded episode of Torchwood).
<3dydnTXcftLiFD7a...@eclipse.net.uk>
And as of today...
> 8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
He's in need of greater recognition, definitely.
There are a couple of near misses, though.
> 1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.
He's claimed that someone *needs* to be pinned down and fucked for two
days non-stop, but never said (indeed, denied on many occasions) that
he'd be the one doing it.
<BeydnbXlEKE...@eclipse.net.uk>
> 5. Spammed a newsgroup.
I suppose that following up everyone he dislikes with the cut-and-paste
demand not to be misquoted, as he's been doing all week, doesn't count?
Maybe if he's written a script to do it?
--
Remove caps to communicate more easily.
Happiness will prevail
Porsche Monkey For Life
Po dribbled:
> I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when Porsche Monkey
> For Life got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>> And here we are -- the test is in my .sig. The nym, BTW, comes from the
>> kook referenced just above the test. Check out his FAQ, if you're
>> intrigued.
>>
> [...]
>>
>> Instructions :
>> In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
>> answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
>> occurrences.
>
> Going on what I've seen of him in radw, Agado barely scores at all.
> Perhaps readers who've followed him to other groups can add more examples,
> but the only one I'm certain of is...
I think I've seen him do #9 and #13 in what I've read of him (most of
which has been x-poasted to AUK), and possibly a couple others.
>> 10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
>
> This entry could have been written especially for him. Here are some of
> the highlights:
>
> "IGNORANT SHOT FOR BRIANS!"
> (in the aforementioned "all drama was based on real history" debate)
> <FoidndS1VIHGGODa...@eclipse.net.uk>
<considers MP's "Life of Brian" as being based on real history> Yeah, OK,
I can go along with that. More believable than the "gospels", anyway.
> "BLOODY HELL !!!! THE SCENES FROM THE TV SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE
> FIRST PLACE AND IF THE OTHER SCENES OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN LOCATIONS HAD TO
> BE INCLUDED IS SHOULD THE SHOULD HAVE BEEN CUT IN, IN DOCKLANDS."
> (the context helps only slightly)
> <OsOdnfadY-X...@pipex.net>
When k00ks get ranty, they tend to fuck up a lot more often.
> "GET IT YOU IGNORANT? [...] GET AN EDUCATION YOU IGNORANT IMBECILE!"
> (while giving detailed instructions on how to edit the gay propaganda out
> of a downloaded episode of Torchwood).
> <3dydnTXcftLiFD7a...@eclipse.net.uk>
<re-calibrates irony meter>
> And as of today...
>
>> 8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
>
> He's in need of greater recognition, definitely.
Be advised, though -- my colleagues can be a bit, ah, "rambunctious", and
kook-poking tends to result in massive over-foamage, with the major kooks.
You may want to maintain a fleet of buses for immediate evacuation...Also,
do a quick read-up on the definition of "forgery". You may find that
posting nyms are not sacrosanct (that's not a sword on a string over your
head, it's a 16-tonne weight, if your nym is sacred;-{P}).
> There are a couple of near misses, though.
>
>> 1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.
>
> He's claimed that someone *needs* to be pinned down and fucked for two
> days non-stop, but never said (indeed, denied on many occasions) that he'd
> be the one doing it.
> <BeydnbXlEKE...@eclipse.net.uk>
Yeah, threats are usually implied by k00ks -- they tend to catch
themselves at the last possible moment, before they become likely to get
TOS'ed, though the ones who don't are the big w(h)inners, who get the
Kenny. *That* Kenny, just because we're(tinw) bastards.;-{P}
>> 5. Spammed a newsgroup.
>
> I suppose that following up everyone he dislikes with the cut-and-paste
> demand not to be misquoted, as he's been doing all week, doesn't count?
> Maybe if he's written a script to do it?
Oh, that definitely counts. But I think either Phil or Paul would probably
be more capable at appraising him, though I can hardly be certain of that.
I know Paul/Pippa has been a radwer longer than Aggie, but I'm not sure
about either Phil or yerself.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
The original "Henry Schmidt"; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Do not taunt the Happy Fun Ball. If Happy Fun Ball starts to smoke, run
away and take cover."
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
The PM4L FAQ: http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
================================================
Brad Jesness Memorial Kook Appraisal Test (KAT or KAT Index) v. 5.1 by
Cipher and the a.u.k crew
So, you think you've got a contender, eh? Hard to separate the Kooks
from the mere pains in the ass though. Hopefully this will help you.
Instructions :
In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
Grading scale follows questions.
Have they ever :
1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.
2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.
3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
cancel*
4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".
5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.
6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.
7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.
8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.
9. Made a spelling flame. (*)
10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)
12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
have.
13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
cannot know anything about any other subject.
In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.
2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"
3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
article.
4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.
5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.
6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.
7. Defended a well known kook.
8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.
10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.
11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.
12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')
13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.
In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.
2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.
Agamemnon
> In message
> <1c803a73-5aa2-47fc...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
> "pbo...@aol.com" <pbo...@aol.com> writes
>>> Oh, and that the "Digital Millennium Copyright Act" says that copyright
>>> holders must not use any form of copy protection, and that if they do
>>> they have to facilitate, at their expense, removal of such protection,
>>> so that you can make as many copies as you like.
>>>
>>> Also that the DMCA, despite being a US law, forms part of British common
>>> law.
>>
>>Huh? Hadn't run across any of that.
>
Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling lying
racist troll.
Agamemnon
> In message
> <pan.2008.07.13....@lucifer.the.great.beast.666.or.is.it.616>
> , The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
> <absurd_numb...@hell.everyposehasits.corn> writes
>>OK, will one of you (Phil, Will, Paul, Marc, whoever actually knows the
>>scoop on him) go do the test in the .sig belonging to my "Porsche Monkey
>>For Life" nym? And x-poast it to AUK, if you don't mind.
>
Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling lying
racist troll.
Agamemnon
> In message <6dspc9F...@mid.individual.net>, marc_CH
> <ma...@crumhorn.org> writes
>>pbo...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> I can't remember if anyone dared to ask him who the characters in
>>> Midsummer Night's Dream were in reality. I think he ignored the
>>> question.
>>
>>Not surprised. Isn't there a character in there called 'Bottom'?
>>
>
Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling lying
racist troll.
The Face of Po
Porsche Monkey For Life got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> On the long hot summer day of Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:21:26 +0100, The Face of
> Po dribbled:
> > I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when Porsche Monkey
> > For Life got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> >> 8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
> >
> > He's in need of greater recognition, definitely.
>
> Be advised, though -- my colleagues can be a bit, ah, "rambunctious", and
> kook-poking tends to result in massive over-foamage, with the major kooks.
> You may want to maintain a fleet of buses for immediate evacuation...
Yes... I've followed some of the threads around previous nominations
(John Shocked), and realised I don't have either the time or the hide to
be part of AUK. I prefer to retreat to these cosy corners of usenet,
occasionally prodding the village idiot, as he's relatively harmless
(and I think he's sulking and ignoring me anyway).
> Also,
> do a quick read-up on the definition of "forgery". You may find that
> posting nyms are not sacrosanct (that's not a sword on a string over your
> head, it's a 16-tonne weight, if your nym is sacred;-{P}).
Most of the header forgery I've seen was in last year's sp_rgery, so it
was easy to spot and not targetting anyone in particular. It'd be a
right pain to have to go back to the drawing board and think up another
bad pun, if someone wanted to drag this one through the mud.
> >> 5. Spammed a newsgroup.
> >
> > I suppose that following up everyone he dislikes with the cut-and-paste
> > demand not to be misquoted, as he's been doing all week, doesn't count?
> > Maybe if he's written a script to do it?
>
> Oh, that definitely counts. But I think either Phil or Paul would probably
> be more capable at appraising him, though I can hardly be certain of that.
> I know Paul/Pippa has been a radwer longer than Aggie, but I'm not sure
> about either Phil or yerself.
I've only been following since the series restarted. Anything from his
glorious heyday reaches me through the recommendations of others. And
that usually involves reading through google groups, so I get sick of
the interface before finishing the thread.
pbo...@aol.com
wrote:
> I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
> Porsche Monkey For Life got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>
> > On the long hot summer day of Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:21:26 +0100, The Face of
> > Po dribbled:
> > > I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when Porsche Monkey
> > > For Life got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
> [...]
> > >> 8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
>
> > > He's in need of greater recognition, definitely.
>
> > Be advised, though -- my colleagues can be a bit, ah, "rambunctious", and
> > kook-poking tends to result in massive over-foamage, with the major kooks.
> > You may want to maintain a fleet of buses for immediate evacuation...
>
> Yes... I've followed some of the threads around previous nominations
> (John Shocked),
I remember him from my BSG group days! Last time I ran into Snarky, no
less. JS is the one who was convinced so-straight-it-hurts BSG was
promoting a secret gay agenda only he could see, right?
> > > I suppose that following up everyone he dislikes with the cut-and-paste
> > > demand not to be misquoted, as he's been doing all week, doesn't count?
> > > Maybe if he's written a script to do it?
>
> > Oh, that definitely counts. But I think either Phil or Paul would probably
> > be more capable at appraising him, though I can hardly be certain of that.
> > I know Paul/Pippa has been a radwer longer than Aggie, but I'm not sure
> > about either Phil or yerself.
>
> I've only been following since the series restarted. Anything from his
> glorious heyday reaches me through the recommendations of others. And
> that usually involves reading through google groups, so I get sick of
> the interface before finishing the thread.
Same here, though in that time I've spent an alarmingly large amount
of time in threads with Aggy in. He's just so funny.
Phil
solar penguin
<PorscheMonkey4L...@iridebutyoudrive.com> wrote:
> I know Paul has been a radwer longer than Aggie, but I'm not sure
> about either Phil or yerself.
No, was originally here before I ever joined. See
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.drwho/browse_frm/thread/9a4f46c33c3c0008/d9ff8e7dc2060a35#d9ff8e7dc2060a35
for proof that people thought he was just as stupid back then too.
>
> Instructions :
> In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
> answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
> occurrences.
>
> Grading scale follows questions.
Personally, I think it's kind of pointless applying all these
arbitrary and random rules just to find out which meaningless category
we're supposed to categorise him under. But if it stops you wasting
Google Groups screen space with that sig, here goes...
>
> Have they ever :
>
> 1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.
>
Yes. Plenty of calling people "stupid ignorants", which probably
counts as ad-hminem.
Total score now: 1 point.
> 2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.
Being British (well, Greek British) he's not likely to "Federal Law",
existent or otherwise. But he did once wrongly claim an American law
was part of British Common Law, so I'm going to count that as an
honorary Yes.
Total score now: 2 points.
>
> 3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
> cancel*
Probably not. As no-one here has ever cancelled anything with or
without proper formatting, he's never had the opportunity to call it
anything.
Total score: 2 points.
>
> 4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
> Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".
This group isn't moderated, so again, probably not. I think he
might've ranted here about the moderation on OG, but I can't be
bothered to check.
Total score still: 2 points.
>
> 5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
> killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.
No. He wouldn't censor people. He needs us disagreeing with him to
feed his trolling. It lets him know he's the centre of attention.
Total score still: 2 points.
>
> 6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.
He's not even smart enough to know when he's lost a flame war. He can
be completely and utterly defeated, and still convince himself that he
was the unquestioned winner.
Total score still: 2 points.
>
> 7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.
No idea. I certainly wouldn't complain. He's too entertaining.
Total score: still 2 points.
>
> 8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.
No. Too vain. He has to be the centre of attention himself.
Total score: still 2 points.
>
> 9. Made a spelling flame. (*)
Yes, even though his spelling is far from perfect. (But that's not
his fault. He types the words correctly, but then his spell-checker
changes the words for the wrong ones when he's not looking!)
Total score now: 3 points.
>
> 10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
Yes, repeatedly, as Po said. He deserves at least a zilliard points
for this, but I'll be restrained and only give him two.
Total score now: 5 points.
>
> 11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
> diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
> projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)
Yes. Especially when it comes to projecting his own behaviour. Two
points for repeated offences, plus two bonus for projection.
Total score now: 9 points.
>
> 12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
> have.
I suppose it _might_ be possible that he scraped through with a Third
Class BSc in physics despite knowing nothing about the subject.
That's the British education system for you! But since he also claims
to be an expert on every single subject despite knowing nothing about
any of them, I'm going to treat this as Yes anyway.
Total score now: 10 points.
>
> 13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
> cannot know anything about any other subject.
Yes, repeatedly. We're all "stupid ignorants" who should "get and
education".
Total score now: 12 points.
>
> In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
> answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
> occurrences.
>
> 1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.
He called Marc a whore without proof, so I'll call that half a Yes.
Total score now: 13 points.
>
> 2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"
Being Greek British he's hardly likely to invoke the Republican Party
for any reason. This test seems unfairly weighted in favour of
American k00ks.
Total score: 13 points.
>
> 3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
> article.
I don't think anyone's ever bothered to cancel his articles. He's far
too entertaining.
Total score: 13 points.
>
> 4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.
No, too vain. He's got to be the centre of attention himself.
Total score: 13 points.
>
> 5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.
I've know idea. I don't even know what a Freedom Knight is. It
sounds like something to do with the Order of the Garter? He wouldn't
want that. Not Greek enough.
Total score: still 13 points.
>
> 6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.
No. Like I said, he's too vain for sock puppets.
Total score: still 13 points.
>
> 7. Defended a well known kook.
IIRC he defended Fairplay a few years back, although Fairplay was more
of a troll than a k00k. Call that half a Yes.
Total score: now 14 points.
>
> 8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
If this counts, then yes.
Total score: now 16 points.
>
> 9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
> creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.
Yes, the rule about not quoting him out of context in sigs.
Total score: now 18 points.
>
> 10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
> enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
> other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.
No. That would require him to imagine a life with friends and
associates away from Usenet. He wouldn't even know where begin
imagining something like that.
Total score: 18 points.
>
> 11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
> are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
> achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.
No. Like I said, he claims to be an expert in everything, but doesn't
normally mention academic qualifications.
Apart from the Third Class physics degree, he's self taught, entirely
by reading ancient Greek philosophers, and proud of it. After all,
ancient Greek knowledge is always better than the modern, revisionist
stuff they teach in universities these days...
Total score: still 18 points.
>
> 12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
> more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')
Not on radw. Not many posters using academic titles here. He _might_
have done it on soc.history.ancient though. I couldn't say for sure.
Total score: still 18 points.
>
> 13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
> impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.
Not any AUK regulars. But he did claim he was being impersonated by
"a false impersonator", whatever that is. Let's call this another
Half a Yes.
Total score: now 19 points.
>
> In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
> answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
> occurrences.
>
> 1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.
Yes. The incident that Po mentioned up-thread. Plus he tried to
wriggle out from that cock-eating thing by claiming he wasn't talking
about fellatio but dismemberment/cannibalism, because that's so much
more normal and decent...
But as neither of these were a direct threat, I'm only giving 3 points
for both combined.
Total score: now 21 points.
>
> 2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.
No. He's too much in denial to ever harm himself.
Total score: still 21 points.
>
> 3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.
No. He has no real idea what off-line is. The idea of a world away
from his computer isn't something he fully understands.
Total score: still 21 points.
>
> 4. Mail-bombed anyone.
No.
Total score: still 21 points.
>
> 5. Spammed a newsgroup.
Yes. Spammed radw with his cut-and-paste "Do not quote out of context
you dissembling liar."
Total score: now 24 points.
>
> 6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.
No. Far too busy posting the real thing.
Total score: still 24 points.
>
> 7. Lost an account due to abuse.
Not as far as I know.
Total score: still 24 points.
>
> 8. Won a kook award.
No, not yet.
Total score: still 24 points.
>
> 9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
> Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)
>
> (Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
> counsel)
No. A lawsuit would mean spending time away from his computer. He
couldn't do that.
Total score: still 24 points.
>
> 10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.
No. Like I said, he wouldn't even know where to begin imagining life
away from his computer.
Total score: still 24 points.
>
> 11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.
Does The List count as a sort of FAQ? I'm not sure, so let's call
this Half a Yes again.
Total score: now 25.5 points.
>
> 12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.
No. The ancient Greeks didn't have sysadmins or ISP owners, so he
wouldn't be interested in being either of those.
Total score: still 25.5 points.
>
> 13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
> email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.
No. I don't think he even emails complaints when he can just rant on
Usenet instead.
Total score: still 25.5 points.
>
> 14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?
Well, he's a right tosser, but I don't even understand the question.
Total score: still 25.5 points.
> 11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
> kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.
>
> 26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
> Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.
Exactly halfway between a Journeyman and First Class. See, I told you
these arbitrary rules and classifications were useless.
The Face of Po
> > 13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
> > cannot know anything about any other subject.
>
> Yes, repeatedly. We're all "stupid ignorants" who should "get and
> education".
I took the words "any _other_ subject" to mean this isn't merely him
telling us to get an education. The exchange would have to be of the
form
Aggie: "Get an education."
Other: "I studied <X> at O-/A-/degree- level."
Aggie: "Therefore you know nothing about <Y>."
pbo...@aol.com
wrote:
He also believes that education went downhill immediately after he
took his exams, so that anyone who didn't study O-Levels at the same
age as him is clearly uneducated, whatever their qualifications at any
level. This is why Aggy makes such a fuss of stressing that he took O-
Levels; he hasn't quite worked out that stressing time and again that
he's nearing 40 while still living with his parents and having no job
doesn't speak wonders for the education he received (then again, nor
do his opinions on everything under the sun).
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
> On 13 Jul, 16:55, Porsche Monkey For Life
>
> <PorscheMonkey4L...@iridebutyoudrive.com> wrote:
> > I know Paul has been a radwer longer than Aggie, but I'm not sure
> > about either Phil or yerself.
>
> > have.
>
> I suppose it _might_ be possible that he scraped through with a Third
> Class BSc in physics despite knowing nothing about the subject.
I'll give him credit - his knowledge of physics is a bit better than
that of most subjects, and his ideas on it are sufficiently out of
date that it's plausible he studied 15-20 years ago. As long as it was
a physics course that dealt with classical physics and astronomy but
avoided quantum mechanics as a major component, it's even possible he
could have passed. Plus for all anyone here knows he might still have
had vestiges of sanity back then. Also, he's a bit more consistent
than most people claiming fake degrees - and his refusal to name an
institution or mention how well he did suggests he's probably not out
to impress with it (the average faker will say something along the
lines of "I'm so l33t I got an A from the University of Oxbridge", or
something only marginally less transparent).
Given how vain Aggy is, it's surprising enough that he doesn't brag
about his degree more than he does. But remember - Homer Simpson took
physics at college. :-)
> > 13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
> > cannot know anything about any other subject.
>
> Yes, repeatedly. We're all "stupid ignorants" who should "get and
> education".
Not sure that's because of a degree or research topic, though - he
says it regardless of whether it's a subject he's been educated in
(and regardless of
> > 2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"
>
> Being Greek British he's hardly likely to invoke the Republican Party
> for any reason.
And being Aggy he might not regard "Republican Nazi (sorry, NAZI,
which as we all know is an acronym, though for what Aggy refuses to
tell us) Paedophile" as an insult anyway...
> > 3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
> > article.
>
> I don't think anyone's ever bothered to cancel his articles. He's far
> too entertaining.
Hmm, he has ranted about Wikipedia with the strong implication that he
submitted changes to articles that weren't approved, and he moans
about "revisionists" a lot. I'd call that half a yes at least.
> > 5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.
>
> I've know idea. I don't even know what a Freedom Knight is. It
> sounds like something to do with the Order of the Garter? He wouldn't
> want that. Not Greek enough.
Though he might go for the Order of the Codpiece.
> > 10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
> > enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
> > other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.
>
> No. That would require him to imagine a life with friends and
> associates away from Usenet. He wouldn't even know where begin
> imagining something like that.
He's mentioned having a mate (always singular) from time to time. For
Aggy that probably counts as a powerful ally.
> > 11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
> > are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
> > achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.
>
> No. Like I said, he claims to be an expert in everything, but doesn't
> normally mention academic qualifications.
Very telling, isn't it? Over-eager to complain about the "education"
of others, but not precisely forthcoming about his own.
> > 12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
> > more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')
>
> Not on radw. Not many posters using academic titles here. He _might_
> have done it on soc.history.ancient though. I couldn't say for sure.
Is "Esq" an academic title? I always thought it was just an archaic
substitute for "Mr", only placed at the end of the name rather than
the beginning.
And people who add 'PhD' to their names at the end (except for
professional correspondence where it might be justified) are generally
k00ks themselves.
> > 2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.
>
> No. He's too much in denial to ever harm himself.
Whatever do you mean? He harms himself with every post...
> 3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.
>
> No. He has no real idea what off-line is. The idea of a world away
> from his computer isn't something he fully understands.
On the other hand, if RTD counts as an opponent, he may be getting
close to the stalking.
Phil
Mr.Smartypants
It's the lowest station in the peerage. Lawyers are "esquires"
Go figure. I alway thought they were vermin.
Porsche Monkey For Life
penguin dribbled:
> On 13 Jul, 16:55, Porsche Monkey For Life wrote:
>
>> I know Paul has been a radwer longer than Aggie, but I'm not sure about
>> either Phil or yerself.
>
> No, was originally here before I ever joined. See
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.drwho/browse_frm/thread/9a4f46c33c3c0008/d9ff8e7dc2060a35#d9ff8e7dc2060a35
> for proof that people thought he was just as stupid back then too.
I distinctly remember you in 2000 and 2001 -- you're the one who got me
into "Vanishing Cream"...Aggie's profile dates back to 2002, and only to
September '02 in RADW. OGJ, V jnf nfyrrc jura V tbg lbhe rznvy. Jr arrq gb
qvfphff pregnva nfcrpgf bs guvf znggre ryfrjurer...
>> Instructions :
>> In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
>> answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
>> occurrences.
>>
>> Grading scale follows questions.
>
> Personally, I think it's kind of pointless applying all these arbitrary
> and random rules just to find out which meaningless category we're
> supposed to categorise him under. But if it stops you wasting Google
> Groups screen space with that sig, here goes...
Tagging k00ks is a great way to enjoy the insanity of usenet -- and as it
happens, I see multiple awards in the Greek Idiot's future. I suspect
we(tinw) have a Bullis on our(tino) hands. AUK included because Aggie is
on-topic there. SHA included for reasons explained below.
>> Have they ever :
>>
>> 1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.
>
> Yes. Plenty of calling people "stupid ignorants", which probably counts
> as ad-hminem.
>
> Total score now: 1 point.
Oh, multiple instances get a point per instance -- going by the
temperament he's exhibited in the past six weeks or so (my newsreader has
posts from the big x-poasted thread with rec.arts.poems from two months
ago, but I haven't looked that far back for Mr. Mycenaean), I'd estimate
a minimum of ten points for this alone.
>> 2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.
>
> Being British (well, Greek British) he's not likely to "Federal Law",
> existent or otherwise. But he did once wrongly claim an American law was
> part of British Common Law, so I'm going to count that as an honorary Yes.
Yeah, I'd say that counts. 11.
> Total score now: 2 points.
>
>> 3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
>> cancel*
>
> Probably not. As no-one here has ever cancelled anything with or without
> proper formatting, he's never had the opportunity to call it anything.
RADW has been sheltered...
> Total score: 2 points.
>
>> 4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
>> Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".
>
> This group isn't moderated, so again, probably not. I think he might've
> ranted here about the moderation on OG, but I can't be bothered to check.
So, lack of opportunity, then. Or has he ever posted to radwm?
> Total score still: 2 points.
>
>> 5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
>> killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.
>
> No. He wouldn't censor people. He needs us disagreeing with him to feed
> his trolling. It lets him know he's the centre of attention.
He's a lock for the Sidaway...
> Total score still: 2 points.
>
>> 6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.
>
> He's not even smart enough to know when he's lost a flame war. He can be
> completely and utterly defeated, and still convince himself that he was
> the unquestioned winner.
I see at least three "Kooky Kombat" awards for him, too. Pickett, Custer,
Special Ops Cody. I doubt he'll ever be fit for a Kenny, though -- he'd
have to lose at least five accounts due to net.abuse.
> Total score still: 2 points.
>
>> 7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.
>
> No idea. I certainly wouldn't complain. He's too entertaining.
Well, I guess he's never pulled any stunts like the ones Yads is currently
doing.
> Total score: still 2 points.
>
>> 8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.
>
> No. Too vain. He has to be the centre of attention himself.
Yep, definitely a Sidaway.
> Total score: still 2 points.
>
>> 9. Made a spelling flame. (*)
>
> Yes, even though his spelling is far from perfect. (But that's not his
> fault. He types the words correctly, but then his spell-checker changes
> the words for the wrong ones when he's not looking!)
A point per occurrence, though, but I hesitate to estimate. Ahem. 12.
> Total score now: 3 points.
>
>> 10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
>
> Yes, repeatedly, as Po said. He deserves at least a zilliard points for
> this, but I'll be restrained and only give him two.
ROFL! 14.
> Total score now: 5 points.
>
>> 11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
>> diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
>> projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)
>
> Yes. Especially when it comes to projecting his own behaviour. Two
> points for repeated offences, plus two bonus for projection.
OK, going by my estimate, 18 points.
> Total score now: 9 points.
>
>> 12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
>> have.
>
> I suppose it _might_ be possible that he scraped through with a Third
> Class BSc in physics despite knowing nothing about the subject. That's the
> British education system for you! But since he also claims to be an
> expert on every single subject despite knowing nothing about any of them,
> I'm going to treat this as Yes anyway.
Yeah, I've seen his cosmological views. 19.
> Total score now: 10 points.
>
>> 13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
>> cannot know anything about any other subject.
>
> Yes, repeatedly. We're all "stupid ignorants" who should "get and
> education".
LOL -- 21.
> Total score now: 12 points.
>
>> In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
>> answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
>> occurrences.
>>
>> 1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.
>
> He called Marc a whore without proof, so I'll call that half a Yes.
Pedo, drug pusheer, whore, wev -- same diff. Two points, plus 21 -- 23.
> Total score now: 13 points.
>
>> 2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"
>
> Being Greek British he's hardly likely to invoke the Republican Party for
> any reason. This test seems unfairly weighted in favour of American
> k00ks.
Yeah, gotta adjust for other countries. The test was composed by Yanks, so
what can ya do? ;-{P} <ducks American colleagues> Anyway. I'm giving him
two points for all the screaming about "racism" whenever he's called a
"Greek <fitb>".
> Total score: 13 points.
25.
>> 3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
>> article.
>
> I don't think anyone's ever bothered to cancel his articles. He's far too
> entertaining.
Yeah. Mind you, his BI is rising precipitously from all his screeching
demands for people to stop quoting him "out of context" (BTW, you can
easily muffle him by adding a message-ID to any quote you use. Then he
can't complain about context anymore.), but more on that below.
> Total score: 13 points.
>
>> 4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.
>
> No, too vain. He's got to be the centre of attention himself.
True.
> Total score: 13 points.
>
>> 5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.
>
> I've know idea. I don't even know what a Freedom Knight is. It sounds
> like something to do with the Order of the Garter? He wouldn't want that.
> Not Greek enough.
It's a usenet thing -- the Usenet Freedom Fighters, composed entirely of
screeching k00ks, and he'd fit right in.
> Total score: still 13 points.
>
>> 6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.
>
> No. Like I said, he's too vain for sock puppets.
Yeah.
> Total score: still 13 points.
>
>> 7. Defended a well known kook.
>
> IIRC he defended Fairplay a few years back, although Fairplay was more of
> a troll than a k00k. Call that half a Yes.
OK, 26.
> Total score: now 14 points.
>
>> 8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
>
> If this counts, then yes.
Now it does, yeah, for KOTM. 28.
> Total score: now 16 points.
>
>> 9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
>> creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.
>
> Yes, the rule about not quoting him out of context in sigs.
>
> Total score: now 18 points.
So, up to thirty already.
>> 10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
>> enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
>> other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.
>
> No. That would require him to imagine a life with friends and associates
> away from Usenet. He wouldn't even know where begin imagining something
> like that.
>
> Total score: 18 points.
LMAO
>> 11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
>> are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
>> achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.
>
> No. Like I said, he claims to be an expert in everything, but doesn't
> normally mention academic qualifications.
>
> Apart from the Third Class physics degree, he's self taught, entirely by
> reading ancient Greek philosophers, and proud of it. After all, ancient
> Greek knowledge is always better than the modern, revisionist stuff they
> teach in universities these days...
>
> Total score: still 18 points.
Oh, he's so Wollmannesque -- his admission to having fantasies about
bestiality, however, are pure Richard "St00pid" Bullis.
>> 12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
>> more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')
>
> Not on radw. Not many posters using academic titles here. He _might_
> have done it on soc.history.ancient though. I couldn't say for sure.
>
> Total score: still 18 points.
<adds soc.history.ancient> If an SHA reg who is aware of Aggie's posting
history could do their own kook appraisal of him, that would be
appreciated.
>> 13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
>> impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.
>
> Not any AUK regulars. But he did claim he was being impersonated by "a
> false impersonator", whatever that is. Let's call this another Half a
> Yes.
>
> Total score: now 19 points.
OK, 31.
>> In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
>> answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
>> occurrences.
>>
>> 1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.
>
> Yes. The incident that Po mentioned up-thread. Plus he tried to wriggle
> out from that cock-eating thing by claiming he wasn't talking about
> fellatio but dismemberment/cannibalism, because that's so much more normal
> and decent...
>
> But as neither of these were a direct threat, I'm only giving 3 points for
> both combined.
>
> Total score: now 21 points.
ROFL! 34.
>> 2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.
>
> No. He's too much in denial to ever harm himself.
>
> Total score: still 21 points.
>
>> 3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.
>
> No. He has no real idea what off-line is. The idea of a world away from
> his computer isn't something he fully understands.
>
> Total score: still 21 points.
>
>> 4. Mail-bombed anyone.
>
> No.
>
> Total score: still 21 points.
>
>> 5. Spammed a newsgroup.
>
> Yes. Spammed radw with his cut-and-paste "Do not quote out of context you
> dissembling liar."
>
> Total score: now 24 points.
Oooh, 37.
>> 6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.
>
> No. Far too busy posting the real thing.
>
> Total score: still 24 points.
>
>> 7. Lost an account due to abuse.
>
> Not as far as I know.
>
> Total score: still 24 points.
>
>> 8. Won a kook award.
>
> No, not yet.
>
> Total score: still 24 points.
>
>> 9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
>> Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)
>>
>> (Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
>> counsel)
>
> No. A lawsuit would mean spending time away from his computer. He
> couldn't do that.
>
> Total score: still 24 points.
>
>> 10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.
>
> No. Like I said, he wouldn't even know where to begin imagining life away
> from his computer.
>
> Total score: still 24 points.
>
>> 11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.
>
> Does The List count as a sort of FAQ? I'm not sure, so let's call this
> Half a Yes again.
>
> Total score: now 25.5 points.
38.5
>> 12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.
>
> No. The ancient Greeks didn't have sysadmins or ISP owners, so he
> wouldn't be interested in being either of those.
>
> Total score: still 25.5 points.
>
>> 13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
>> email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.
>
> No. I don't think he even emails complaints when he can just rant on
> Usenet instead.
>
> Total score: still 25.5 points.
>
>> 14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?
>
> Well, he's a right tosser, but I don't even understand the question.
>
> Total score: still 25.5 points.
TOS = "Terms of Service".
>> 11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
>> kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.
>>
>> 26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
>> Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.
>
> Exactly halfway between a Journeyman and First Class. See, I told you
> these arbitrary rules and classifications were useless.
No, I'd say he's above and beyond "First Class". My total: 38.5.
36 - 50 points : Kook cum Laude. Someone is considering writing a FAQ
about your Prospective Kook. Has been nominated for at least one a.u.k
award.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
The original "Henry Schmidt"; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Do not taunt the Happy Fun Ball. If Happy Fun Ball starts to smoke, run
away and take cover."
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
The PM4L FAQ: http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
================================================
Brad Jesness Memorial Kook Appraisal Test (KAT or KAT Index) v. 5.1 by
Cipher and the a.u.k crew
So, you think you've got a contender, eh? Hard to separate the Kooks
from the mere pains in the ass though. Hopefully this will help you.
Instructions :
In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
Grading scale follows questions.
Have they ever :
1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.
2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.
3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
cancel*
4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".
5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.
6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.
7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.
8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.
9. Made a spelling flame. (*)
10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)
12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
have.
13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
cannot know anything about any other subject.
In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.
2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"
3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
article.
4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.
5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.
6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.
7. Defended a well known kook.
8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.
9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.
10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.
11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.
12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')
13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.
In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.
1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.
2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.
3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.
4. Mail-bombed anyone.
5. Spammed a newsgroup.
6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.
7. Lost an account due to abuse.
8. Won a kook award.
9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)
(Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
counsel)
10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.
11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.
12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.
13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.
14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?
(*) PalmJob Exception Rule. Cannot be applied to a mere troll's points.
(**) Brad Jesness Factor. Not applicable to BJ, it is expected.
Scale/Rank :
1 - 10 points : Kook Wannabe. Needs to read Grubor's posting history on
dejanews. Your Prospective Kook has much to learn. They may have just
screwed up once or twice.
11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.
26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.
36 - 50 points : Kook cum Laude. Someone is considering writing a FAQ
solar penguin
>
> I took the words "any _other_ subject" to mean this isn't merely him
> telling us to get an education. The exchange would have to be of the
> form
>
> Aggie: "Get an education."
> Other: "I studied <X> at O-/A-/degree- level."
> Aggie: "Therefore you know nothing about <Y>."
>
Don't forget that Aggie often uses "get an education," to mean "learn
trivia about dead Greek guys because that's the only kind of education
that really matters."
Other: "I studied <X> at O-/A-/degree- level."
Aggie: "Therefore you know nothing about <insert name of dead Greek
guy here>. Get an education."
solar penguin
> On the long hot summer day of Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:16:47 -0700, solar
> penguin dribbled:
>
> > On 13 Jul, 16:55, Porsche Monkey For Life wrote:
>
>
> > Personally, I think it's kind of pointless applying all these arbitrary
> > and random rules just to find out which meaningless category we're
> > supposed to categorise him under. But if it stops you wasting Google
> > Groups screen space with that sig, here goes...
>
> Tagging k00ks is a great way to enjoy the insanity of usenet -- and as it
> happens, I see multiple awards in the Greek Idiot's future. I suspect
> we(tinw) have a Bullis on our(tino) hands. AUK included because Aggie is
> on-topic there. SHA included for reasons explained below.
>
You're getting old, Snarky. What happened to the young rebel who
rejected pigeonholing people? And who refused to even use fixed rules
for categorising people as male or female?
Now with less than a year before you turn 40, you're rebelling
_against_ your youthful rebellions, and embracing the kinds of formal
rules and categories you once fought against. Depressing, isn't it?
Ignis Fatuus
Cross Posting, Cross Dressing, and Cottaging in rec.org.mensa.
Subject: Re: If you could live in another place and time.
=========
Nope. Not living in any place or time where I can't have access to a
flushing toilet and soft toilet paper or something close.
Message-ID: <l_adnR9tzMEPw-XV...@eclipse.net.uk>
===
> I'd like to go to Athens, too, but I'd want to be a man, not a woman.
> Wouldn't it be great to be at the Symposium and able to add our own ideas
> to the discussion?
If you are referring to Plato the discussion was about the purest kind of
love. Better that you remain a woman so that the conversion isn't dominated
by buggery with Socrates being the only opposing voice. Xenophon's Symposium
had a more open debate.
Message-ID: <evWdnTfEkb0cE-TV...@eclipse.net.uk>
===
The Romans had toilets with flowing water to wash away the excrement and
sewers for it to go down. The Ancient Greeks probably used the same kind of
system.
Message-ID: <y5CdnSdEg4pcIeTV...@eclipse.net.uk>
===
> But if I went to Plato's as a woman I expect I would be chucked out. I've
You could come dressed as a flute girl or an acrobat.
> found my "other half", though!
Message-ID: <Y8WdnV4ftp5wM-fV...@eclipse.net.uk>
= IF
pbo...@aol.com
wrote:
And sometimes "Therefore you know nothing about <X>". Aggylogic, you
understand. It's patentable.
Phil
pbo...@aol.com
Ad hominem is defined as attacking the person in lieu of responding to
the argument. Aggy never responds to the argument, and ALWAYS shouts
"FOOL!", "stupid ignorant", "dissembling liar", "comprehensionally
challenged" etc. Ad hominem is practically the only way he
communicates.
> > Total score now: 3 points.
>
> >> 10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
>
> > Yes, repeatedly, as Po said. He deserves at least a zilliard points for
> > this, but I'll be restrained and only give him two.
>
> ROFL! 14.
Also, Aggy believes that what he calls "underpunctuation" is
preferable to, say, correct punctuation, if this counts. He seems to
like exclamation marks a lot more than he likes commas, though.
> > Total score now: 9 points.
>
> >> 12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
> >> have.
>
> > I suppose it _might_ be possible that he scraped through with a Third
> > Class BSc in physics despite knowing nothing about the subject. That's the
> > British education system for you! But since he also claims to be an
> > expert on every single subject despite knowing nothing about any of them,
> > I'm going to treat this as Yes anyway.
>
> Yeah, I've seen his cosmological views. 19.
Couldn't find it in a quick search, but IIRC one of his cosmological
views was that Ptolmaic astronomy was essentially accurate with
modification (such as the minor modification of putting the sun at the
centre of the solar system). This is the same "Ptolmaic" which
scientists now use as a byword for "gibberish".
> > Total score now: 10 points.
>
> >> 13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
> >> cannot know anything about any other subject.
>
> > Yes, repeatedly. We're all "stupid ignorants" who should "get and
> > education".
But we have to "lear to speak English" first.
>> 3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
> >> article.
>
> > I don't think anyone's ever bothered to cancel his articles. He's far too
> > entertaining.
>
> Yeah. Mind you, his BI is rising precipitously from all his screeching
> demands for people to stop quoting him "out of context" (BTW, you can
> easily muffle him by adding a message-ID to any quote you use. Then he
> can't complain about context anymore.), but more on that below.
The amusing thing is that Aggy believes the context in which he said
he wanted to suck a man's cock makes it seem less, well, gay.
Phil
Teh Czar ov Awl Teh Flonkers
2008 23:58:22 -0700 in rec.arts.drwho or alt.usenet.kooks, they're so drad:
> On 14 Jul, 07:37, Porsche Monkey For Life wrote:
>> On the long hot summer day of Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:16:47 -0700, solar
>> penguin dribbled:
>> > On 13 Jul, 16:55, Porsche Monkey For Life wrote:
>>
>> > Personally, I think it's kind of pointless applying all these
>> > arbitrary and random rules just to find out which meaningless category
>> > we're supposed to categorise him under. But if it stops you wasting
>> > Google Groups screen space with that sig, here goes...
>>
>> Tagging k00ks is a great way to enjoy the insanity of usenet -- and as
>> it happens, I see multiple awards in the Greek Idiot's future. I suspect
>> we(tinw) have a Bullis on our(tino) hands. AUK included because Aggie is
>> on-topic there. SHA included for reasons explained below.
>
> You're getting old, Snarky. What happened to the young rebel who rejected
> pigeonholing people? And who refused to even use fixed rules for
> categorising people as male or female?
Well, the pigeonholes aren't exactly applicable off of usenet, and are
mainly meant to increase enjoyment /of/ usenet (Bullis, frex, has won
over 30 awards from AUK, and is capable of winning more -- Wollmann's
won over 40, but he's infamous for abusing the abuse process, which
Aggie apparently doesn't use). Also, fixed rules for male and female
categories are still out of the question, IMHO.
> Now with less than a year before you turn 40, you're rebelling _against_
> your youthful rebellions, and embracing the kinds of formal rules and
> categories you once fought against. Depressing, isn't it?
Ehh, I'm contrary. In another ten years, I'll probably rebel against
everything I stand for now...
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! All hail Discordia!! Kallisti!!!
Lola Stonewall Riot, Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Wouldn't it be wonderful if everyone renounced violence forever? I
could then conquer the whole stupid planet with just a butter knife."
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
2001 RADW Bitch of the Year, ADRIC Awards (by acclamation); mhm 29x21;
Tom Baker's #1 Fan; Flonk Leader #2 & #11 1/9; S.N.A.R.K.Y.: Synthetic
Networked Android Responsible for Killing and Yardwork; the Discordian
People's Most Powerful and Revered Being (without portfolio); Demon of
Mockery and Silliness, Demon Lord of Confusion, Demon Prince of
Absurdity; Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition; Lola, called
Snarky, Queen of the Snarks of Ærisia; Queen of Rice; TransWench; Ship's
Chaos Demon, Bad Ship BetNoirian; The God of Odd Statements; Dr. L. C.
Snark, Professor of Philosophy, Critical Theory (Liberal Arts and
Contemporary Studies), Mockery, Silliness, Confusion, Absurdity, Chaos,
& General Mayhem, Centre For Xena Studies; The God-Fairy-Demon Snark;
The Black Goat With A Thousand Young; Pope Snarky Goodfella of the
undulating cable, JM, CK, POEE, KOTHASK, GGGHD, MWFA, HCNB, CPFG, CEM;
Superfaggot; Canadian Popular Front for the Whitetail Jihad; Wearer of
the Holy FAGGOT Hat; Sec'y, Int'l Homosexual Conspiracy; Treasurer,
Int'l Anarchist Conspiracy; Czar of all the Flonkers; Mastermind of the
SMOF; allegedly The Worst Kind Of Feminist; Chas. E. Pemberton; Pete
Stapleton; Joseph Bartlo; Koi-Lo; Henry Schmidt, the PorscheMonkey4Life;
TEH USENETS BULLIE
ICQ: 135930147; popesnarkyatcaballistadotorg
BITCH PRIDE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quotable quotes:
"So the American government lied to the Native Americans for many, many
years, and then President Clinton lied about a relationship, and
everyone was surprised! A little naive, I feel!"
-- Eddie Izzard
"Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it, you'd
have good people doing good things and evil people doing bad things, but
for good people to do bad things, it takes religion."
-- Steven Weinberg, Nobel Laureate
"i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop
Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID:
<1253073.6...@unixd0rk.com>
"Gabrielle?! Monkey-man, you bring her back! You know, you two are
beginning to irritate me with these obsessions of yours!
Fish don't just catch themselves!" -- Xena, "Fins, Femmes, &
Gems" (64/318)
Quoth Max Grrl to the Monkey:
> Free cl00: Why do you think you've been nominated for so many awards,
> Dribbles???
"Because y'all have so many nyms. Like I stated yesterday. Your b1tch as$
opinion doesn't mean $hit to me. You are totally irrelevant to me. I
continue flame you because I like kicking retards around." -- The
Monkey-man is unaware that Max Grrl only _has_ one nym. MID:
<jq9xh.875$hH2.700@trnddc02>
"Open wide and wait for a $hit explosion, turdboy" -- Joxer isn't very
well-acquainted with the concept of not aiming the flamethrower at his
own position. MID: <r7Wxh.2191$384.676@trnddc05>
NightMist wrote about Beauty/Venus In Furs/Olympiada:
> By the by, the "BT" that was mentioned in my exchange with her? That is
> a retired bishop that she thinks is lurking in usenet groups giving her
> secret messages about what and where to post.
"I did not say he was giving me anonymous messages about where to post,
I said he *may* have given me anonymous messages about where to post."
-- No, Beauty's not a paranoid k00k at all. No way. Doesn't
everyone(tine) think that way, sometimes? Message-ID:
<ergl7i$njc$3...@registered.motzarella.org>
Mr.Smartypants
As I recall his lamest attempt to distance himself from the RTD cock
thing was when he said it was simply his way of letting SP punish him
if he was wrong...........which automaticly opened up the door to
Aggy's S&M closet.
RAD has a real gem in Aggy. Where else could you get this kind of
entertainment?
Teh Czar ov Awl Teh Flonkers
Jul 2008 00:28:54 -0700 in rec.arts.drwho, alt.usenet.kooks, or
soc.history.ancient, they're so drad:
Alright, up that to 25, then. Puts him over 50, and firmly in Kook Magna
cum Laude (which was what I initially thought, but one opinion doesn't
signify much, by itself) territory.
>> > Total score now: 3 points.
>>
>> >> 10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.
>>
>> > Yes, repeatedly, as Po said. He deserves at least a zilliard points
>> > for this, but I'll be restrained and only give him two.
>>
>> ROFL! 14.
>
> Also, Aggy believes that what he calls "underpunctuation" is preferable
> to, say, correct punctuation, if this counts. He seems to like
> exclamation marks a lot more than he likes commas, though.
So I've noticed. Actually, give him five points for that. Not that it
matters...
>> > Total score now: 9 points.
>>
>> >> 12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
>> >> have.
>>
>> > I suppose it _might_ be possible that he scraped through with a Third
>> > Class BSc in physics despite knowing nothing about the subject.
>> > That's the British education system for you! But since he also
>> > claims to be an expert on every single subject despite knowing
>> > nothing about any of them, I'm going to treat this as Yes anyway.
>>
>> Yeah, I've seen his cosmological views. 19.
>
> Couldn't find it in a quick search, but IIRC one of his cosmological
> views was that Ptolmaic astronomy was essentially accurate with
> modification (such as the minor modification of putting the sun at the
> centre of the solar system). This is the same "Ptolmaic" which
> scientists now use as a byword for "gibberish".
Oh, yeah, I see many aspects of both Bullis and Wollmann in Aggie.
>> > Total score now: 10 points.
>>
>> >> 13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another
>> >> poster cannot know anything about any other subject.
>>
>> > Yes, repeatedly. We're all "stupid ignorants" who should "get and
>> > education".
>
> But we have to "lear to speak English" first.
Personally, I'd rather forgo that.;-{P}
> >> 3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
>> >> article.
>>
>> > I don't think anyone's ever bothered to cancel his articles. He's
>> > far too entertaining.
>>
>> Yeah. Mind you, his BI is rising precipitously from all his screeching
>> demands for people to stop quoting him "out of context" (BTW, you can
>> easily muffle him by adding a message-ID to any quote you use. Then he
>> can't complain about context anymore.), but more on that below.
>
> The amusing thing is that Aggy believes the context in which he said he
> wanted to suck a man's cock makes it seem less, well, gay.
Well, he didn't state any conditions, he just made the flat statement
that he'd suck RTD's cock "if it was on offer". I can well believe Russell
would be worried by the thought of having Aggie anywhere near him...BTW,
if you could email me, that'd be appreciated, and that goes for IF, as
well. If the addy in my sig no longer works, substitute "meow.org" for the
domain.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! All hail Discordia!! Kallisti!!!
Lola Stonewall Riot, Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Wouldn't it be wonderful if everyone renounced violence forever? I
could then conquer the whole stupid planet with just a butter knife."
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
solar penguin
> > On the long hot summer day of Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:16:47 -0700, solar
> > penguin dribbled:
>
> > > Yes, repeatedly. We're all "stupid ignorants" who should "get and
> > > education".
>
> But we have to "lear to speak English" first.
>
I once literally followed his advice to "Lear to recognise where your
paragraphs end," but I don't think he got the joke.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.drwho/msg/acba622aac105fa6
Ignis Fatuus
ROTFLOL
He that has and a little tiny wit
with hey, ho, the wind and the rain
must make content with his fortunes fit,
for the rain it raineth every day.
= IF
pbo...@aol.com
In his defence, we know Aggy's never read Shakespeare. Then again, I
can't remember King Lear but the joke was still pretty obvious.
Phil
The Doctor
The snark must be getting HALed.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
hulahoop
>
> > > But we have to "lear to speak English" first.
>
> > I once literally followed his advice to "Lear to recognise where your
> > paragraphs end," but I don't think he got the joke.http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.drwho/msg/acba622aac105fa6
>
> In his defence, we know Aggy's never read Shakespeare. Then again, I
> can't remember King Lear but the joke was still pretty obvious.
>
> Phil
He probably would have recognised it if SP had used phrases from "The
Owl and the Pussycat" which is probably much more too his taste
At school I was always told that King Lear was too challenging. Mind
you I went to the same school as Andy Burnham and he is only Culture
Secretary in the British Government! This explains a lot!
Regards
Ged
pbo...@aol.com
> On Jul 14, 10:45 am, "pbow...@aol.com" <pbow...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > But we have to "lear to speak English" first.
>
> > > I once literally followed his advice to "Lear to recognise where your
> > > paragraphs end," but I don't think he got the joke.http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.drwho/msg/acba622aac105fa6
>
> > In his defence, we know Aggy's never read Shakespeare. Then again, I
> > can't remember King Lear but the joke was still pretty obvious.
>
> > Phil
>
> He probably would have recognised it if SP had used phrases from "The
> Owl and the Pussycat" which is probably much more too his taste
>
> At school I was always told that King Lear was too challenging.
I recall studying five Shakespeare plays over my school career, and
King Lear wasn't among them.
Mind
> you I went to the same school as Andy Burnham and he is only Culture
> Secretary in the British Government!
Well, in that case The Owl and the Pussycat would probably be too
challenging for the sort of person who goes onto become a politician,
especially with such an undemanding portfolio.
Phil
Poster@poster.com Top Poster
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g5fp2f$j9$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Astrobiochemist
> > Class BSc in physics despite knowing nothing about the subject.
>
> I'll give him credit - his knowledge of physics is a bit better than
> that of most subjects, and his ideas on it are sufficiently out of
> date that it's plausible he studied 15-20 years ago. As long as it was
> a physics course that dealt with classical physics and astronomy but
> avoided quantum mechanics as a major component, it's even possible he
> could have passed. Plus for all anyone here knows he might still have
> had vestiges of sanity back then. Also, he's a bit more consistent
> than most people claiming fake degrees - and his refusal to name an
> institution or mention how well he did suggests he's probably not out
> to impress with it (the average faker will say something along the
> lines of "I'm so l33t I got an A from the University of Oxbridge", or
> something only marginally less transparent).
>
> Given how vain Aggy is, it's surprising enough that he doesn't brag
> about his degree more than he does. But remember - Homer Simpson took
> physics at college. :-)
He went to Imperial College London. I asked him about it once.
Like you, Phil, I don't doubt that Aggy actually took undergraduate
classes in physics back when he was in school and I can completely
believe that he has an undergraduate degree in physics. It's just
that he took the classes 20+ years ago, hasn't kept up on the subject
and even then, was never taught what was the more advanced and cutting
edge material back then.
Agamemnon
> In message
> <78233462-75bc-47ea...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> writes
>>Although [...] he regularly gets desires to have sex with animals and
>>other men's arses
>
> WOW - I missed that one - what thread was THAT in?
Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling lying
racist troll.
Will Tingle
<agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> writes
I love that he's replied to my sig, but hasn't corrected the assertion
that he gets the desire to shag animals...
--
Remeber - anyone who accuses me of quoting (or mis quoting) them after I say
this, is identifying themseves as "Joblessgreekvirgin":
"I love the taste of cat's ass in the morning"
- Joblessgreekvirgin, rec.arts.drwho
Will Tingle
Remove YOUR_PANTS to e-mail
Agamemnon
Agamemnon
news:iLmdnb3VsK_x_-DV...@eclipse.net.uk..
Dissembling racist troll. stop quoting fragments of context you
dissembling fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling
lying racist troll. stop quoting racist troll. stop uoting.
The Doctor
Send it my way.
Poster@poster.com Top Poster
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:g5jolq$4st$7...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Will Tingle
Agamemnon <agam...@h3110.t0.NO_SPAM> writes
WTF?
--
Remeber - anyone who accuses me of quoting them after I say this, is
identifying themseves as "Joblessgreekvirgin":
"GET AND EDUCATION"
"LEAR SOME COMPREHENSION SKILLS"
"I will eat RTD's cock, assuming it is on offer."
(¯`·.¸Teh Secretary to Teh Imperial Court of MEOW¸.·´¯)
> Agamemnon <agam...@h3110.t0.NO_SPAM> writes
>>"Agamemnon" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
>>news:iLmdnb3VsK_x_-DV...@eclipse.net.uk..
>>
>>Dissembling racist troll. stop quoting fragments of context you
>>dissembling fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling
>>lying racist troll. stop quoting racist troll. stop uoting.
>
> WTF?
Purpx gur urnqre vasb, naq abgr gur ZVQ sbezng sbe shgher ersrerapr...
pbo...@aol.com
wrote:
> In message <zry9y6$w2...@sci.physics.inadmissible-hooter.com.zimbabwe>,
> Agamemnon <agamem...@h3110.t0.NO_SPAM> writes
>
> >"Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
> >news:iLmdnb3VsK_x_-DV...@eclipse.net.uk..
>
> >Dissembling racist troll. stop quoting fragments of context you
> >dissembling fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling
> >lying racist troll. stop quoting racist troll. stop uoting.
>
> WTF?
Like Donna, Aggy's broken down after a metagenic transfer. The sum of
knowledge in an average human brain was as overwhelming for him as
that in a Time Lord brain is to an average human.
Phil
Will Tingle
Secretary to Teh Imperial Court of MEOW¸.·´¯)" <BiGWhi...@yahoo.com>
writes
Jung nz V ybbxvat sbe?
> naq abgr gur ZVQ sbezng sbe shgher ersrerapr...
Jung qbrf gung rira zrna?
Agamemnon
Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling lying
racist troll.
Agamemnon
Stop quoting fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling lying
racist troll.
adam
"Agamemnon" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
I don't know why, but I can imagine a Dalek voice saying that.
The Black Goat With A Thousand Young
eye, and foamed wildly:
> On 16 Jul, 11:34, Will Tingle wrote:
>> Agamemnon writes
>> >"Agamemnon" wrote..
>>
>> >Dissembling racist troll. stop quoting fragments of context you
>> >dissembling fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling
>> >lying racist troll. stop quoting racist troll. stop uoting.
>>
>> WTF?
>
> Like Donna, Aggy's broken down after a metagenic transfer. The sum of
> knowledge in an average human brain was as overwhelming for him as that in
> a Time Lord brain is to an average human.
Dunno what you mean about Donna (and you will not explain it to me), but
abgr gur urnqref bs gur ynggre Nttvr.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! Cthulhu fhtagn! mhm 29x21; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
Chas. E. Pemberton; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Life size models of Cthulhu, on sale now!"
"Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it
adversely."
-- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID:
<V6xNe.27650$XM3....@bignews5.bellsouth.net>
"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:
<jljOe.5348$ZD4.3...@bignews3.bellsouth.net>
"For the most part, morality is universal." -- John "Easily" Shocked
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<Ie2Qe.8199$wb5....@bignews1.bellsouth.net>
"Gay men deserve to die." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<RSR3f.23691$5l.1...@bignews1.bellsouth.net>
"Laws count, the US Constitution count more, and we need to have judges
on the bench who are going to Carry Out those laws, not Make Law or
Interpret Law." -- John "Easily" Shocked contradicts his own words on
the overriding importance of society's reluctance to accept
homosexuality, in Message-ID: <brIDe.67062$Qo.12613@fed1read01>
"I heard that you are still trespassing in the USA. If it's black, it
refuses to work and it accuses whites of racism. What a joke.
Look at a map and see where Africa is, bitchboy. What is this GOD DAMNED
NIGGERISH ALLEGIANCE YOU HAVE TO TRYING TO GET WHITE PEOPLE TO HAND OFF
OTHER WHITE PEOPLE TO SOMEONE YOU THINK IS NOT AGAINST YOUR CRIMINAL
ALLEGIANCE??????
Too afraid to tell the truth?
WIMPS!
COWARDS!
LIARS!
MILITANT ASSPRICKS!
LOSERS!
FAILED BULLSHITBOYS WHOSE CANDY HAS NO RED ON IT! YOU KNOW IT TO BE TRUE!
I LICKED THE RED OFF YOUR CANDY BECAUSE YOU ARE YOUR ILK HAVEN'T GOT ANY
FURY!
THAT'S WHY YOU CAN'T BEAT ME VIA ANY LAWFUL MEANS WHATSOEVER! YOU'RE A
NAMBY PAMBY ANTI-USA ASSPRICK!" -- Huge pools of MOLTEN WENTZKY are
being found all over the Carolinas, after his reply to Panama Floyd, in
Message-ID: <qiA3k.2556$Xe....@bignews1.bellsouth.net>
The Black Goat With A Thousand Young
and foamed wildly:
> "(¯`·.¸Teh Secretary to Teh Imperial Court of MEOW¸.·´¯)" writes
>>All Hail Fluffy! On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:34:51 +0100, Will Tingle whined:
>>> Agamemnon <agam...@h3110.t0.NO_SPAM> writes
>>>>"Agamemnon" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
>>>>news:iLmdnb3VsK_x_-DV...@eclipse.net.uk..
>>>>
>>>>Dissembling racist troll. stop quoting fragments of context you
>>>>dissembling fragments of conversations out of context you dissembling
>>>>lying racist troll. stop quoting racist troll. stop uoting.
>>>
>>> WTF?
>>
>>Purpx gur urnqre vasb,
>
> Jung nz V ybbxvat sbe?
Gur nqql jvyy or frireryl zhatrq, nf n ehyr, naq gurer jvyy bsgra or na
K-Xvyysvyr yvar, gubhtu abg nyjnlf.
>> naq abgr gur ZVQ sbezng sbe shgher ersrerapr...
>
> Jung qbrf gung rira zrna?
Gur qbznva jvyy hfhnyyl or n pbzovangvba bs fbzr arjftebhc naq na
bhgentrbhfyl ehqr qrfpevcgvba bs fbzr "anhtugl ovgf". Gur bevtvangbe unf n
jvpxrq, *jvpxrq* frafr bs uhzbhe.