5 stars AB
0-1 stars O
-George
4
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
PAtriots! MAke your declaration of loyalty!
>In article <13e4kdb...@news.supernews.com>,
>George Avalos <george...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"The Family of Blood"
>>9-7-07 Dr. Who
>>
>>
>>5 stars AB
>>
>>0-1 stars O
>>
>>-George
>>
>>
>
>4
I really love the high level of intellectual discourse these "pick a
number" threads encourage. It is extremely fulfilling to click on a
post and get to read "4". It expands my mind and makes me happy to be
alive.
**
Captain Infinity
finally! I've been avoiding threads with the titles of episodes that
have yet to be shown here, finally opened a great long one last night
after seeing Part 2, and discovered it had nothing whatsoever to do with
the show, but seemed to be a 350-long exchange of insults and
meaninglessness.
OK, to comment--after waiting an extra week between the two parts for
some reason I fail to comprehend. It wasn't a favorite. I thought it
was drawn out far too long, apparently for "suspense"(aka boredom) and
needless violence. I can see no earthly reason why, if the watch
couldn't have been hidden away in the TARDIS in a location Martha knew,
it couldn't have been entrusted to her instead of being left lying
around in plain sight. This was a pretty stupid Doctor this time, it
seemed to me.
3.2
--
Mary, biblioholic
bib-li-o-hol-ism : the habitual longing to purchase, read, store,
admire, and consume books in excess.
> OK, to comment--after waiting an extra week between the two parts for
> some reason I fail to comprehend. It wasn't a favorite. I thought it
> was drawn out far too long, apparently for "suspense"(aka boredom) and
> needless violence. I can see no earthly reason why, if the watch
> couldn't have been hidden away in the TARDIS in a location Martha knew,
> it couldn't have been entrusted to her instead of being left lying
> around in plain sight. This was a pretty stupid Doctor this time, it
> seemed to me.
All true and yet I overlook it all for showcasing how alien our Doctor
really is and what a frickin' badass he can be.
4.5
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fbua42$p33$9...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <13e4kdb...@news.supernews.com>,
> George Avalos <george...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >"The Family of Blood"
> >9-7-07 Dr. Who
> >
>
Yeah, putting a little girl alien in every mirror and dropping mom into an
event horizon.
Mofo is hardcore. Word.
--
"Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made."
-- Otto von Bismarck
Look at my review from weeks ago.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Voting Canadians vote anyone but Harper Cronies!!
Faily of Blood is adaopted from the NA Human Nature.
>In article <rfe5e396l8s1i6ot9...@4ax.com>,
>Captain Infinity <Infi...@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
>>Once Upon A Time The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>>In article <13e4kdb...@news.supernews.com>,
>>>George Avalos <george...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>"The Family of Blood"
>>>>9-7-07 Dr. Who
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>5 stars AB
>>>>
>>>>0-1 stars O
>>>>
>>>>-George
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>4
>>
>>
>>I really love the high level of intellectual discourse these "pick a
>>number" threads encourage. It is extremely fulfilling to click on a
>>post and get to read "4". It expands my mind and makes me happy to be
>>alive.
>>
>>
>>**
>>Captain Infinity
>
>Look at my review from weeks ago.
No.
**
Captain Infinity
| I can see no earthly reason why, if the watch
| couldn't have been hidden away in the TARDIS in a location Martha knew,
| it couldn't have been entrusted to her instead of being left lying
| around in plain sight.
My thought exactly.
| This was a pretty stupid Doctor this time, it
| seemed to me.
Stupid and wreckless. And if we are to believe Big Brother's comment
about the Doctor's hiding to spare The Family (which seems reasonable
given how easily he was able to dispatch the threat once he changed
back) one has to wonder why he holds those aliens in higher regard than
humans. At least the nurse observed that the Doctor caused all the
deaths by acting on a whim.
Since when does wrapping someone in dwarf star alloy chains confer
immortality? And when did the Doctor start indulging in torture of
his enemies? He wouldn't even leave the Master with Chronos. The
Family just wanted to survive after all...
Dan Lanciani
ddl@danlan.*com
Then retract your last comment.
>In article <6m46e396omg31c32u...@4ax.com>,
>Captain Infinity <Infi...@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
>>Once Upon A Time The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>>In article <rfe5e396l8s1i6ot9...@4ax.com>,
>>>Captain Infinity <Infi...@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
>>>>Once Upon A Time The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <13e4kdb...@news.supernews.com>,
>>>>>George Avalos <george...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>"The Family of Blood"
>>>>>>9-7-07 Dr. Who
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>5 stars AB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>0-1 stars O
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-George
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I really love the high level of intellectual discourse these "pick a
>>>>number" threads encourage. It is extremely fulfilling to click on a
>>>>post and get to read "4". It expands my mind and makes me happy to be
>>>>alive.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>**
>>>>Captain Infinity
>>>
>>>Look at my review from weeks ago.
>>
>>No.
>>
>
>Then retract your last comment.
Screw you. Why should I have to research your posts from a week ago to
decipher what you mean by "4". You're a fucking idiot. Post smething
worth reading or shut the fuck up.
**
Captain Infinity
That's what you get for taking your pills.
Because gropus.google.com need no collapse on the weight of repeated posts.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fbv3qm$7vj$3...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <rfe5e396l8s1i6ot9...@4ax.com>,
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fbv3s9$7vj$4...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fbv6ai$7vj$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fbv41u$7vj$6...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <CqudnW2HToomZ3_b...@comcast.com>,
> Victor Velazquez <vict...@notnow.com> wrote:
> >"erilar" <dra...@chibardun.net.invalid> wrote in message
> >news:drache-848838....@news.airstreamcomm.net...
>
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fbvf7l$peg$5...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <us76e3lu2lc47bo20...@4ax.com>,
> In article <drache-848838....@news.airstreamcomm.net>,
> dra...@chibardun.net.invalid (erilar) writes:
>
> | I can see no earthly reason why, if the watch
> | couldn't have been hidden away in the TARDIS in a location Martha knew,
> | it couldn't have been entrusted to her instead of being left lying
> | around in plain sight.
>
> My thought exactly.
>
> | This was a pretty stupid Doctor this time, it
> | seemed to me.
>
> Stupid and wreckless. And if we are to believe Big Brother's comment
> about the Doctor's hiding to spare The Family (which seems reasonable
> given how easily he was able to dispatch the threat once he changed
> back) one has to wonder why he holds those aliens in higher regard than
> humans. At least the nurse observed that the Doctor caused all the
> deaths by acting on a whim.
>
> Since when does wrapping someone in dwarf star alloy chains confer
> immortality?
Yeah, it was like falling in the Sarnac pit to be digested for 1000
years. I suspect it won't bother you after the first few minutes.
--
Why watch the Sci Fi Channel?
For every Flash Gordon, there is an Earthstorm!!
4.25
Look, your opinion of the episode interested me enough to click on your
post in *this* thread. Then I discovered that your opinion of the
episode was "4", which informed me as much as if you had posted the word
"spoon".
Your opinion does *not* interest me enough to prompt me to fuck with
Google Groups and try to track you back several weeks. Screw that.
Screw *you*. You're plonked, friend, plonked to the level of "4".
**
Captain Infinity
Great. Another genius puts his 2 cents in.
**
Captain Infinity
4.9
One of my favorite of the new series.
..
--
We must change the way we live,
or the climate will do it for us.
> >>>Look at my review from weeks ago.
> >>
> >>No.
> >>
> >
> >Then retract your last comment.
>
> Screw you. Why should I have to research your posts from a week ago to
> decipher what you mean by "4". You're a fucking idiot. Post smething
> worth reading or shut the fuck up.
Or perhaps you aren't after all.
Its a poll, George have been doing it for decades. Its not hard to
filter out.
Ha-ha!
Like *that's* gonna happen.
What? You're not going to post something worth reading?
(ducks)
I had to give it a 3.
It's good, but the reasoning behind it sucked. All this harm and
destruction and pain caused because the Doctor decided to be kind to a bunch
of psychopathic timetravelers with disintegrator beams. Is he stupid?
The show is still good aside from that... but then it ends with not 1, not
2, but 3 epilogues. And all of them were cheesy. The "Don't Fuck With the
Doctor" one would have been good if they had left it at that. Its
refreshing to see the Doctor finally doing some biting. But nope, had to do
a "Perfect Life in an Instant" piece after that... then the "Saving Private
Timothy" bit. Jeebus! They missed the chance to have Timmy look over at
the Doctor and say, "I didn't waste it." And the Doctor nodding as he
walked away with Martha.
Crap, is that a criterion? I musta missed the memo.
> (ducks)
Goose!
LOL!
> "Anim8rFSK" <ANIM...@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:ANIM8Rfsk-C209F...@news.west.cox.net...
> > In article <zvCdnRqiGIad7Xnb...@comcast.com>,
> > "Victor Velazquez" <vict...@notnow.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Captain Infinity" <Infi...@captaininfinity.us> wrote in message
> >> news:us76e3lu2lc47bo20...@4ax.com...
> >> > Once Upon A Time The Doctor wrote:
> >> >>Then retract your last comment.
> >> >
> >> > Screw you. Why should I have to research your posts from a week ago to
> >> > decipher what you mean by "4". You're a fucking idiot. Post smething
> >> > worth reading or shut the fuck up.
> >>
> >> Ha-ha!
> >>
> >> Like *that's* gonna happen.
> >
> > What? You're not going to post something worth reading?
>
> Crap, is that a criterion? I musta missed the memo.
>
> > (ducks)
>
> Goose!
cuac
> "The Family of Blood"
> 9-7-07 Dr. Who
>
> 5 stars AB
>
> 0-1 stars O
5 stars, a superb emotional exploration of the Doctor vs humanity.
--
"Too many TV shows are about answers - easy answers that you get just
before the last commercial. I wanted to do a TV show about questions -
hard questions. Because knowing how to ask the right question is more
important than getting the easy answer." - J. Michael Straczynski
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fc279h$1kb$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fc27dr$1kb$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <ANIM8Rfsk-C209F...@news.west.cox.net>,
5.1
It was an awesome 2-parter.
-- Ken from Chicago
Not since Dr. Banner got his mad on has there been a doctor you do NOT want
to make angry.
-- Ken from Chicago
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fc3j5q$6k3$8...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <1w77254l2ks96.2...@40tude.net>,
> Ian Galbraith <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 00:39:26 -0700, George Avalos wrote:
> >
> I do see especially when he disses MArtha about
> either being human or Time Lord.
We shall see eventually that "The Master" was in fact the post-Tennant
regeneration of The Doctor. :)
Personally I like the badass Doctor.
--thelostguy
Games I Play:
The Cerberus Incident, http://www.landofdev.com/cerberus/
Political Invaders, http://www.sb-software.com/politicalinvaders/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Posted using Android Newsgroup Downloader:
.... http://www.sb-software.com/android
-----------------------------------------------------------
I only wish they would have used this alternate ending:
Doctor and Martha in the future sitting in the audience in a courtroom for a
trial of a notorious serial killer, and someone whispers to Matha "...and the
shame of it was I heard that bastard almost died in back in WWI".
It wasn't a torture, it was a sign. And example. For the ones who would
think to fuck with him in the future. It was basically what he turned
Baines into... a scarecrow.
john
Nice way to read it. Of course, why then go through all the trouble to hide
out?
But I like you're thinking, so I'm going with the scarecrow thing.
--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:fc6a6q$72o$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Baines said it, the Dr could have done all of that and more right from the
beginning... he chose not to because he was being kind. That's the
scarecrow's message, don't assume that just because the Doctor is running
away that he's powerless.
>