Quick question: how can a time traveler arrive late?
**
Captain Infinity
...future imperfect, presently unstable, but past caring.
The same way he can have fire on an airless Mars :-)
--
Edward Cowling North London UK http://www.facebook.com/ed.cowling
http://twitter.com/gnilwoce
He overshot. Once he's arrived somewhere, the [wibble] means he can't
go back and get there a bit earlier.
--
Happiness will prevail
...apart from the times that he can of course!
(As in the 9th Doctor in Fathers Day, who managed to go back to the
accident scene a few minutes before it happened to let Rose have another
go at saving her Father, after she fluffed the first one.) But who expects
consistency from RTD?
I expect consistency from RTD.... the same consistency as dog
diahroea.
A Time Lord cannot revisit his own time line. Exceptions to that rule
have been notable - Rose wanting to see her dad again was not.
Dar
Then he took Leela there a few weeks later :-)
Dr Who is full of inconsistencies, because you can't expect each new
writer to spend years reading all that came before. On one DVD special
there is mention one script that had something like 130 continuity
errors when closely examined !
Depends on how time is streaming.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010
Time Wars messed that up.
He didn't arrive late in the first place. The Master's resurrection
presumably occurred before he was warned by the Ood, since by that
time he was alive and implanting visions in people's heads. Once he'd
taken action as a response to a warning by the Ood that the Master was
alive, presumably the Master's resurrection counted as an event within
the Doctor's timeline, and so unchangeable.
In any case, there's no suggestion in the script that the Doctor
intended to prevent the Master's resurrection, only to stop whatever
his plans were once he knew the Master was back.
Phil
Thanks for the good spoilers.
But when he did that, the Flying Time Monkeys showed up, kidnapped
people, stole the TARDIS innards and nearly destroyed reality.
--
Happiness will prevail
That's why I didn't bother going back any further than RTD's era. But HE
should know what has gone before during his tenure!
But it is sci-fi, so things can just be made up on the hoof and it can all
be put down to the wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey effect. Which is pretty much
why I don't take DW as seriously as some people. It's just entertainment
Jim... but not as we know it. :-)
Well RTD confirmed the whole continuity in Doctor Who: The NExt Doctor.
>> Captain Infinity got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>
>> > Quick question: �how can a time traveler arrive late?
>>
>
>He didn't arrive late in the first place. The Master's resurrection
>presumably occurred before he was warned by the Ood,
Well, yes, because the Ood have been one hundred years recovering
from being enslaved by future humans, which raises the question
what effects this whole "end of time" thing will have.
>In any case, there's no suggestion in the script that the Doctor
>intended to prevent the Master's resurrection, only to stop whatever
>his plans were once he knew the Master was back.
Point there.
--
-Jack
Okay, "before" from the Doctor's point of view.
Phil
>So The Doctor races from the Planet of the Ood to Earth in order to stop
>"The End of Time". Arriving late, he finds Broadfell Prison destroyed.
>
>Quick question: how can a time traveler arrive late?
A few less obvious questions:
So who did pick up the ring, and how? Or was the Master's body
burnt in a standard quarry, and not the Utopia quarry we'd
thought at the time?
Is this shown uninterrupted on the BBC (and the CBC)? About 40
minutes into it (I would guess 30 without commercials) we see the
face of the goof who's narrating it, as he mentions the next dawn
will bring the Last Day. This seems like a place to put a small
cliffhanger, three or five minutes, and thus BBC America did.
Did it seem discontinuous running directly into the next scene?
Another big threat producing premonitions all year, introduced
with voice overs saying what a big threat it is, and the
cliffhanger showing a mass of threats chanting in unison. I
don't know if I'm getting tired of this, or if it's just that
there were only three episodes of other stuff this year rather
than ten.
--
-Jack
It was shown to be one of the cultists who resurrected him. It wasn't
explained how she got to Utopia and back. He can't have been burned on
Earth because it was established in End of Time that the Doctor burned
the body, and he was stranded on Utopia until the start of the
following episode (where we saw he was carrying no body with him).
> Is this shown uninterrupted on the BBC (and the CBC)? About 40
> minutes into it (I would guess 30 without commercials) we see the
> face of the goof who's narrating it, as he mentions the next dawn
> will bring the Last Day. This seems like a place to put a small
> cliffhanger, three or five minutes, and thus BBC America did.
> Did it seem discontinuous running directly into the next scene?
Don't remember what happened when - what was the small cliffhanger?
> Another big threat producing premonitions all year, introduced
> with voice overs saying what a big threat it is, and the
> cliffhanger showing a mass of threats chanting in unison. I
> don't know if I'm getting tired of this, or if it's just that
> there were only three episodes of other stuff this year rather
> than ten.
No, the foreboding narration really was appalling.
Phil
You've lost me here; the Doctor burned the Master's body at the end of
Last Of The Timelords - there's no mention that he went back to Utopia
to do this. In End Of Time he re-iterates that he burned the Master's
body - but again there's no mention of Utopia, unless I've missed
something...
D'oh! Of course, why did I imagine he died in Utopia?
- there's no mention that he went back to Utopia
> to do this. In End Of Time he re-iterates that he burned the Master's
> body - but again there's no mention of Utopia, unless I've missed
> something...
Which still doesn't address the question of where the random cultist
came from, how she knew the Master was being cremated at that point
or, if she was following the Doctor, why he never noticed her - she
didn't exactly go to great lengths to stay hidden.
Phil
The old lady who organised the resurrection ceremony.
> Or was the Master's body
> burnt in a standard quarry, and not the Utopia quarry we'd
> thought at the time?
The shot of the ring being picked up was in "Last of the Time Lords", so
although it could have been mistaken for the Utopia quarry initially, I
think we were meant to realise that it was another human and therefore
on Earth - fan speculation at the time was that it could have been Lucy.
> Is this shown uninterrupted on the BBC
Yes.
> (and the CBC)? About 40
> minutes into it (I would guess 30 without commercials) we see the
> face of the goof who's narrating it, as he mentions the next dawn
> will bring the Last Day. This seems like a place to put a small
> cliffhanger, three or five minutes, and thus BBC America did.
> Did it seem discontinuous running directly into the next scene?
The narrated montage looked like the right place for an ad break, yes.
Watching it through, the way that the narrator saying "the /final/ day"
flows into the Doctor/Master lightning-bolt confrontation comes across
as "the final day... starts like this:".
--
Happiness will prevail
REcall LAst of the Time Lords - The MAster was always watching the Doctor and
turned the TARDIS into a paradox machine.
At the End of Last ofthe TimeLords the MAster's human wife
picked up his ring IIRC.
REcall the Master was resurrected during the Time War.
Hmm ...
In this case RTD has spun an tangled time web.
CBC has not show the 5 DT specials; SPace has now picked up DW..
Point well taken.
>I was hanging out with the cool kids in rec.arts.drwho when
>Jack Bohn got out a spraycan and scrawled the following:
>>
>> A few less obvious questions:
>> So who did pick up the ring, and how?
>
>The old lady who organised the resurrection ceremony.
>
>> Or was the Master's body
>> burnt in a standard quarry, and not the Utopia quarry we'd
>> thought at the time?
>
>The shot of the ring being picked up was in "Last of the Time Lords", so
>although it could have been mistaken for the Utopia quarry initially, I
>think we were meant to realise that it was another human and therefore
>on Earth - fan speculation at the time was that it could have been Lucy.
Didn't speculation switch to the Ranni during the "she returns"
tease for the year before this?
I forget if it was explicitly said to be the head cultist. We
could still think it was Lucy, not under hypnotic compulsion, nor
wanting power in the same sense as the cultists, but in some way
just to know she now "owned" the Master the way he'd owned her.
And then it went horribly wrong.
>> About 40
>> minutes into it (I would guess 30 without commercials) we see the
>> face of the goof who's narrating it, as he mentions the next dawn
>> will bring the Last Day. This seems like a place to put a small
>> cliffhanger, three or five minutes, and thus BBC America did.
>> Did it seem discontinuous running directly into the next scene?
>
>The narrated montage looked like the right place for an ad break, yes.
>Watching it through, the way that the narrator saying "the /final/ day"
>flows into the Doctor/Master lightning-bolt confrontation comes across
>as "the final day... starts like this:".
Thanks. It seems like the opposite problem to most DVDs of
commercial TV shows: where the music swells up and the scene
fades out for a moment, then fading back in with the music
starting over. Here it seemed like a full stop, with no way to
pick up the next scene. (I might even argue that three to five
minutes of thinking, "Who? What? How?" before continuing the
story is more effective.) But BBC America's clumsy cutting at
the transition point to commercials may have obscured any actual
flow between the scenes.
--
-Jack
Right again. The Ood appeared to him in the street at the end of
"Waters of Mars" fifty years after the time of Donna Noble.
(Not that I'm trying to discourage you. Somehow, somewhere,
someone will come up with a clever way to explain a simultaneous
threat across multiple eras.)
I like the idea that the Doctor didn't really intend to (want to)
interfere with the Master coming back to life. This fits in with
the discussion from "Waters of Mars" about life being the
relationships with people you care about, and making a
difference, not just breathing. It's also groping towards an
explanation why a Doctor with a controllable TARDIS isn't seeking
out empires to topple and invaders to thwart (without merely
making him a Ford Prefect looking for the next party).
--
-Jack
So Lucy Saxon is a puppet of the MAster. @%$&U%^#&%^&@^&
>
>>> About 40
>>> minutes into it (I would guess 30 without commercials) we see the
>>> face of the goof who's narrating it, as he mentions the next dawn
>>> will bring the Last Day. This seems like a place to put a small
>>> cliffhanger, three or five minutes, and thus BBC America did.
>>> Did it seem discontinuous running directly into the next scene?
>>
>>The narrated montage looked like the right place for an ad break, yes.
>>Watching it through, the way that the narrator saying "the /final/ day"
>>flows into the Doctor/Master lightning-bolt confrontation comes across
>>as "the final day... starts like this:".
>
>Thanks. It seems like the opposite problem to most DVDs of
>commercial TV shows: where the music swells up and the scene
>fades out for a moment, then fading back in with the music
>starting over. Here it seemed like a full stop, with no way to
>pick up the next scene. (I might even argue that three to five
>minutes of thinking, "Who? What? How?" before continuing the
>story is more effective.) But BBC America's clumsy cutting at
>the transition point to commercials may have obscured any actual
>flow between the scenes.
>
Then there is CAnada.
>--
>-Jack
The apparition of the ood in Waters of Time:
Please explain the point to that?
Yes, some people suggested the Rani too.
> I forget if it was explicitly said to be the head cultist. We
> could still think it was Lucy, not under hypnotic compulsion, nor
> wanting power in the same sense as the cultists, but in some way
> just to know she now "owned" the Master the way he'd owned her.
> And then it went horribly wrong.
In "Last of the Time Lords", we just see the hand picking up the ring.
In "End of Time (1)", this hand is shown to belong to Miss Trefusis, a
member of the cult.
>>> About 40
>>> minutes into it (I would guess 30 without commercials) we see the
>>> face of the goof who's narrating it, as he mentions the next dawn
>>> will bring the Last Day. This seems like a place to put a small
>>> cliffhanger, three or five minutes, and thus BBC America did.
>>> Did it seem discontinuous running directly into the next scene?
>>
>>The narrated montage looked like the right place for an ad break, yes.
>>Watching it through, the way that the narrator saying "the /final/ day"
>>flows into the Doctor/Master lightning-bolt confrontation comes across
>>as "the final day... starts like this:".
>
> Thanks. It seems like the opposite problem to most DVDs of
> commercial TV shows: where the music swells up and the scene
> fades out for a moment, then fading back in with the music
> starting over. Here it seemed like a full stop, with no way to
> pick up the next scene. (I might even argue that three to five
> minutes of thinking, "Who? What? How?" before continuing the
> story is more effective.) But BBC America's clumsy cutting at
> the transition point to commercials may have obscured any actual
> flow between the scenes.
I think that the production team are aware that the episode will get
chopped up for commercial broadcast, and at least attempt to put some
suitable break points in the script, but the final edit will be for the
uninterrupted version. So BBC America have to work with that, rather
than being able to re-edit the background music.
--
Happiness will prevail
Yeah, and all those suns burning in space - totally unbelievable.
> Dr Who is full of inconsistencies, because you can't expect each new
> writer to spend years reading all that came before.
Excuses. The should compile a bible for the show (like other shows do)
Got you.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
Born 29 Jan 1969 Redhill,Surrey,England UK
--
"The Internet lied again!"
Oh dear, are there really people who think the sun is a big camp fire ?
:-)
Now go to Google and look up nuclear fusion, and remember the Internet
is your friend and can teach you a lot ;-)
It'd be longer - and duller - than the *real* fucking Bible!
The Lofficiers please.
> In article <o%z0n.74$t15...@newsfe11.ams2>,
> john smith <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
> >news:MPG.25ab8b092...@news.usenetserver.com...
> >> In article <VPblrYDh...@genghis0.demon.co.uk>,
> >> Who...@genghis0.demon.co.uk says...
> >>
> >>> Dr Who is full of inconsistencies, because you can't expect each new
> >>> writer to spend years reading all that came before.
> >>
> >> Excuses. The should compile a bible for the show (like other shows do)
> >>
> >
> >It'd be longer - and duller - than the *real* Bible!
> >
>
> The Lofficiers please.
Definitely not! JML's books were notoriously unreliable by not
drawing any difference between his personal theories and what had
actually been established in the show itself. He's the last person
who should be let loose on any official series bible.
Oh dear are there really people who think they saw fire on an airless
Mars.
> :-)
>
> Now go to Google and look up nuclear fusion, and remember the Internet
> is your friend and can teach you a lot ;-)
Yeah and if you kill yourself the world will be a better place.
Duh, and follow it of course.
Just a cross indexed database.
Watch the episode again - the remains of the base were on fire at the
end, exposed on the surface. You take it, I realise, that the effects
of nuclear fusion don't actually look like fire? And are also not self-
sustaining, umcontained by magnetic fields, on a planetary surface?
Phil
> In article <78d1fe1e-58d6-4ff7...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >Yads said:
> >
> >> In article <o%z0n.74$t15...@newsfe11.ams2>,
> >> john smith <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:MPG.25ab8b092...@news.usenetserver.com...
> >> >> In article <VPblrYDh...@genghis0.demon.co.uk>,
> >> >> Who...@genghis0.demon.co.uk says...
> >> >>
> >> >>> Dr Who is full of inconsistencies, because you can't expect each new
> >> >>> writer to spend years reading all that came before.
> >> >>
> >> >> Excuses. The should compile a bible for the show (like other shows do)
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >It'd be longer - and duller - than the *real* Bible!
> >> >
> >>
> >> The Lofficiers please.
> >
> >Definitely not! JML's books were notoriously unreliable by not
> >drawing any difference between his personal theories and what had
> >actually been established in the show itself. He's the last person
> >who should be let loose on any official series bible.
>
> How so unreliable?!
Like I said, by not making any distinction between his favourite
personal theories and what had actually been established in the show
itself. That's how so.
Hell no, once was enough.
He cannot cross his own Time Line.
Airless MArs?
Ummm its a show about TIME TRAVEL... therefore any inconsistencies are
simply changes that haven't been made yet...
Just call them paradoxes.
As pointed out before, except for when he does!
...and more recently, Fathers Day.
Ah! Yes!!
> >> Watch the episode again -
> >
> >Hell no, once was enough.
> >
>
> End of Time is worth repeat performances!
Do some time travel and find out which episode we were talking about
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <hib7co$2b9$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Stephen O'Connell <no....@fk.u.com> wrote:
> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >news:hi9uuc$1a5$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> In article <v3fmj5h8s87ajv1hd...@4ax.com>,
> >> Captain Infinity <Infi...@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
> >>>So The Doctor races from the Planet of the Ood to Earth in order to stop
> >>>"The End of Time". Arriving late, he finds Broadfell Prison destroyed.
> >>>
> >>>Quick question: how can a time traveler arrive late?
> >>
> >> He cannot cross his own Time Line.
> >
> >As pointed out before, except for when he does!
> >
>
> Like the War Games and the Faceless Ones?
No, he didn't cross his own timeline in The War Games. The War Chief
seems to be from the same relative time as the Doctor, and so do the
other Time Lords too.
What's your reason for suggesting they aren't?
�
�The Doctor wrote:
�
�> In article <78d1fe1e-58d6-4ff7...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
�> solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
�> >
�> >Yads said:
�> >
�> >> In article <o%z0n.74$t15...@newsfe11.ams2>,
�> >> john smith <the_jo...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
�> >> >
�> >> >"Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
�> >> >news:MPG.25ab8b092...@news.usenetserver.com...
�> >> >> In article <VPblrYDh...@genghis0.demon.co.uk>,
�> >> >> Who...@genghis0.demon.co.uk says...
�> >> >>
�> >> >>> Dr Who is full of inconsistencies, because you can't expect each new
�> >> >>> writer to spend years reading all that came before.
�> >> >>
Well there are show bibles in pro-outfits, and frankly that is a writers job, in this day and age it is even easier to check back.
Hell you can look up the Toy Maker easily. The problem are fan boys writing crap and being inconsistent with big milestone based things.
It's not just minor continuity.
�> >> >> Excuses. The should compile a bible for the show (like other shows do)
You have to recall the BBC did sanction this action.
If you get fanboys to write, you get what happened in the JNT era -
mindless continuity references at the expense of a story, which puts off
all non-fannish viewers. RTD deliberately avoided this kind of thing,
and that's why there was nobody in the entire production team anal
enough to know eg. that the Doctor was already >=953 years old.
--
Happiness will prevail