Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Four Shopping Months Until . . .
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Matthew Kruk
Aug 24, 2008, 7:35:23 PM8/24/08
to
"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:aqr3b41iqvgcbqiu8...@4ax.com...
>
> . . . Christmas. :)
news:aqr3b41iqvgcbqiu8...@4ax.com...
>
> . . . Christmas. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7KWaVH0UnU
Zipperhead
Aug 24, 2008, 10:29:50 PM8/24/08
to
> --
>
> John Fleming
> Edmonton, Canada
>
> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
>
> John Fleming
> Edmonton, Canada
>
> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
Don we all our gay apparel?
Matthew Kruk
Aug 24, 2008, 10:54:41 PM8/24/08
to
"Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
Sharx35
Aug 25, 2008, 2:13:36 AM8/25/08
to
"Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Speaking for yourself?
peachy ashie passion
Aug 25, 2008, 7:14:50 PM8/25/08
to
Oh yum.
I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
John Fleming
Aug 25, 2008, 10:11:30 PM8/25/08
to
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:54:41 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
wrote:
the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
wrote:
> $http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
How do you dig these up so fast?
Ignis Fatuus
Aug 25, 2008, 10:16:46 PM8/25/08
to
hum
= IF
Ignis Fatuus
Aug 25, 2008, 10:18:54 PM8/25/08
to
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:11:30 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
wrote:
wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:54:41 GMT, while chained to a desk in
>the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
>wrote:
>
>> $http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
>
>How do you dig these up so fast?
>
... as Hare said to Burke.
= IF
Matthew Kruk
Aug 25, 2008, 10:20:40 PM8/25/08
to
"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:vhp6b4p0rtl4lsfgp...@4ax.com...> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:54:41 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
> wrote:
>
>> $http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
>
> How do you dig these up so fast?
High speed internet and a big electronic shovel.
John Fleming
Aug 26, 2008, 12:01:55 AM8/26/08
to
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
<exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>>>
> $>>> --
> $>>>
> $>>> John Fleming
> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>>>
> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>
> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $
> $ Oh yum.
> $
> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
<exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>>>
> $>>> --
> $>>>
> $>>> John Fleming
> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>>>
> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>
> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $
> $ Oh yum.
> $
> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
The Doctor
Aug 26, 2008, 11:12:54 AM8/26/08
to
In article <vqp6b41otormp9298...@4ax.com>,
Hoo hum.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
peachy ashie passion
Aug 26, 2008, 10:10:19 PM8/26/08
to
oooh!
All that much more time to traumatize them!!
John Fleming
Aug 27, 2008, 8:45:20 PM8/27/08
to
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $John Fleming wrote:
> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>> $>
> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $
> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $
> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>
> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>
> $
> $ oooh!
> $
> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>
> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $
> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $
> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>
> $
> $ oooh!
> $
> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
Someone after my own heart. :)
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Matthew Kruk
Aug 27, 2008, 8:47:02 PM8/27/08
to
"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:i7tbb49e2hqskj7u9...@4ax.com...Take 'em back to school shopping, that'll fix 'em.
peachy ashie passion
Aug 27, 2008, 8:59:15 PM8/27/08
to
It fixed me! Now I'm broke and they didn't have the Pokemon shirt
the boy wanted in the right size for him. He was not a happy camper!
John Fleming
Aug 27, 2008, 9:14:33 PM8/27/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:15 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $> "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> news:i7tbb49e2hqskj7u9...@4ax.com...
> $>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?> $>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>>> $>> $
> $>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $
> $>>> $ oooh!
> $>>> $
> $>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>
> $> Take 'em back to school shopping, that'll fix 'em.
> $>
> $>
> $
> $ It fixed me! Now I'm broke and they didn't have the Pokemon shirt
> $the boy wanted in the right size for him. He was not a happy camper!
> $> "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $> news:i7tbb49e2hqskj7u9...@4ax.com...
> $>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>> $>> $
> $>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $
> $>>> $ oooh!
> $>>> $
> $>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>
> $> Take 'em back to school shopping, that'll fix 'em.
> $>
> $>
> $
> $ It fixed me! Now I'm broke and they didn't have the Pokemon shirt
> $the boy wanted in the right size for him. He was not a happy camper!
To much television for the young one there Peachy.
The advertisers have taught him how to think, the only thing
standing between him and getting what the advertisers tell
him he wants is you're bank balance going to zero.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Kaos
Aug 27, 2008, 9:18:52 PM8/27/08
to
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
wrote:
wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
picked out.
...
Needs dusting. BRB.
John Fleming
Aug 27, 2008, 9:31:10 PM8/27/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:18:52 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
> $>On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?> $>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $ oooh!
> $>> $
> $>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>
> $>Someone after my own heart. :)
> $
> $I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $picked out.
the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
> $>On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $ oooh!
> $>> $
> $>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>Someone after my own heart. :)
> $
> $I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $picked out.
Unfortunately, I need my heart for a few more years yet. So
you'll have to find something else for the spot on the
mantle for a few years.
> $Needs dusting. BRB.
Ostritch feather duster is supposed to be the best
available. And it has to be real ostrich feathers.
But if you can't find a decent ostrich feather duster, a
lamb's wool duster makes a reasonable substitute.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
peachy ashie passion
Aug 27, 2008, 10:17:59 PM8/27/08
to
Eh.
He didn't want the shirt until he saw it in the store. I don't know
how I can prevent him from wanting things he sees in the store, except
to never take him to the store.
Since we were at the store shopping for clothes for him, that's not
really practical.
peachy ashie passion
Aug 27, 2008, 10:18:30 PM8/27/08
to
Years? And you haven't got it yet?
Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
John Fleming
Aug 27, 2008, 10:37:51 PM8/27/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:17:59 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $John Fleming wrote:
> $> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:15 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $> "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $>> $> news:i7tbb49e2hqskj7u9...@4ax.com...
> $>> $>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?> $>> $>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Take 'em back to school shopping, that'll fix 'em.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $ It fixed me! Now I'm broke and they didn't have the Pokemon shirt
> $>> $the boy wanted in the right size for him. He was not a happy camper!
> $>
> $> To much television for the young one there Peachy.
> $>
> $> The advertisers have taught him how to think, the only thing
> $> standing between him and getting what the advertisers tell
> $> him he wants is you're bank balance going to zero.
> $
> $ Eh.
> $
> $ He didn't want the shirt until he saw it in the store. I don't know
> $how I can prevent him from wanting things he sees in the store, except
> $to never take him to the store.
> $
> $ Since we were at the store shopping for clothes for him, that's not
> $really practical.
> $> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:15 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $> news:i7tbb49e2hqskj7u9...@4ax.com...
> $>> $>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Take 'em back to school shopping, that'll fix 'em.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $ It fixed me! Now I'm broke and they didn't have the Pokemon shirt
> $>
> $> To much television for the young one there Peachy.
> $>
> $> The advertisers have taught him how to think, the only thing
> $> standing between him and getting what the advertisers tell
> $> him he wants is you're bank balance going to zero.
> $
> $ Eh.
> $
> $ He didn't want the shirt until he saw it in the store. I don't know
> $how I can prevent him from wanting things he sees in the store, except
> $to never take him to the store.
> $
> $ Since we were at the store shopping for clothes for him, that's not
> $really practical.
Well, the solution is pretty straight forward, if hard to
implement. You just don't take him to stores (or
departments) that sell stuff he likes. And it can't be done
in a blatantly obvious fashion, like taking him into the
women's clothing department in a store like Bloomingdales,
either.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Kaos
Aug 28, 2008, 5:55:38 AM8/28/08
to
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:31:10 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
wrote:
wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:18:52 GMT, while chained to a desk in
Awww....
>> $Needs dusting. BRB.
>
>Ostritch feather duster is supposed to be the best
>available. And it has to be real ostrich feathers.
>But if you can't find a decent ostrich feather duster, a
>lamb's wool duster makes a reasonable substitute.
Huh. I just use a swiffer with a light vanilla scent, with occasional
applications of Murphy's Oil.
Kaos
Aug 28, 2008, 1:09:06 PM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion
<exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Always too many witneses...
> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
less talented stalker with lower standards.
peachy ashie passion
Aug 28, 2008, 5:09:04 PM8/28/08
to
Yeah. Well, considering I AM buying clothes for him, I'd really
prefer he likes them.
peachy ashie passion
Aug 28, 2008, 5:09:33 PM8/28/08
to
So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
Why is that?
PV
Aug 28, 2008, 5:57:41 PM8/28/08
to
Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
--
PV
Do not compute the totality of your poultry population before the
manifestations of incubation have ceased.
William Jennings Bryant
John Fleming
Aug 28, 2008, 10:03:26 PM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:09:04 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:17:59 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:15 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $> "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $> news:i7tbb49e2hqskj7u9...@4ax.com...
> $>> $>> $>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $>> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>> $>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Take 'em back to school shopping, that'll fix 'em.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ It fixed me! Now I'm broke and they didn't have the Pokemon shirt
> $>> $>> $the boy wanted in the right size for him. He was not a happy camper!
> $>> $>
> $>> $> To much television for the young one there Peachy.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> The advertisers have taught him how to think, the only thing
> $>> $> standing between him and getting what the advertisers tell
> $>> $> him he wants is you're bank balance going to zero.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Eh.
> $>> $
> $>> $ He didn't want the shirt until he saw it in the store. I don't know
> $>> $how I can prevent him from wanting things he sees in the store, except
> $>> $to never take him to the store.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Since we were at the store shopping for clothes for him, that's not
> $>> $really practical.
> $>
> $> Well, the solution is pretty straight forward, if hard to
> $> implement. You just don't take him to stores (or
> $> departments) that sell stuff he likes. And it can't be done
> $> in a blatantly obvious fashion, like taking him into the
> $> women's clothing department in a store like Bloomingdales,
> $> either.
> $
> $ Yeah. Well, considering I AM buying clothes for him, I'd really
> $prefer he likes them.
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $> news:i7tbb49e2hqskj7u9...@4ax.com...
> $>> $>> $>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $>> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>> $>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Take 'em back to school shopping, that'll fix 'em.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ It fixed me! Now I'm broke and they didn't have the Pokemon shirt
> $>> $>
> $>> $> To much television for the young one there Peachy.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> The advertisers have taught him how to think, the only thing
> $>> $> him he wants is you're bank balance going to zero.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Eh.
> $>> $
> $>> $ He didn't want the shirt until he saw it in the store. I don't know
> $>> $to never take him to the store.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Since we were at the store shopping for clothes for him, that's not
> $>
> $> Well, the solution is pretty straight forward, if hard to
> $> implement. You just don't take him to stores (or
> $> departments) that sell stuff he likes. And it can't be done
> $> in a blatantly obvious fashion, like taking him into the
> $> women's clothing department in a store like Bloomingdales,
> $> either.
> $
> $ Yeah. Well, considering I AM buying clothes for him, I'd really
> $prefer he likes them.
I guess it's too late to train him to accept lower
standards--at least until he is old enough that the more
expensive stuff will fit for more than six months.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
John Fleming
Aug 28, 2008, 10:03:53 PM8/28/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:57:41 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium "PV" <edr...@NOSPAMtelus.net> wrote:
> $peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $> Kaos wrote:
> $>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion
> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>
> $>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>>>> wrote:
> $>>>>
> $>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>>>>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?> $>>>>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>>>>>> $>> $
> $>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>>>>>> $>
> $>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>>>>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>>>>>> $>
> $>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>>>> picked out.
> $>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>>
> $>> Always too many witneses...
> $>>
> $>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>>
> $>> Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
> $>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>
> $> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>
> $> Why is that?
> $
> $
> $Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
the scriptorium "PV" <edr...@NOSPAMtelus.net> wrote:
> $peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $> Kaos wrote:
> $>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion
> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>
> $>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>>>> wrote:
> $>>>>
> $>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>>>>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>> $>> $
> $>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>>>>>> $>
> $>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>>>>>> $>
> $>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>>>> picked out.
> $>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>>
> $>> Always too many witneses...
> $>>
> $>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>>
> $>> Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
> $>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>
> $> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>
> $> Why is that?
> $
> $
> $Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
Ouch!!
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
peachy ashie passion
Aug 28, 2008, 10:21:15 PM8/28/08
to
Eh, he's a good kid. And besides, the Pokemon shirt was all sold out.
peachy ashie passion
Aug 28, 2008, 10:29:16 PM8/28/08
to
easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
jar on the mantle, I think hard is better.
John Fleming
Aug 28, 2008, 10:43:01 PM8/28/08
to
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:21:15 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:09:04 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:17:59 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:15 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> "John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>> $> news:i7tbb49e2hqskj7u9...@4ax.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>> $>> $>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> Take 'em back to school shopping, that'll fix 'em.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ It fixed me! Now I'm broke and they didn't have the Pokemon shirt
> $>> $>> $>> $the boy wanted in the right size for him. He was not a happy camper!
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> To much television for the young one there Peachy.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> The advertisers have taught him how to think, the only thing
> $>> $>> $> standing between him and getting what the advertisers tell
> $>> $>> $> him he wants is you're bank balance going to zero.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Eh.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ He didn't want the shirt until he saw it in the store. I don't know
> $>> $>> $how I can prevent him from wanting things he sees in the store, except
> $>> $>> $to never take him to the store.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Since we were at the store shopping for clothes for him, that's not
> $>> $>> $really practical.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Well, the solution is pretty straight forward, if hard to
> $>> $> implement. You just don't take him to stores (or
> $>> $> departments) that sell stuff he likes. And it can't be done
> $>> $> in a blatantly obvious fashion, like taking him into the
> $>> $> women's clothing department in a store like Bloomingdales,
> $>> $> either.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Yeah. Well, considering I AM buying clothes for him, I'd really
> $>> $prefer he likes them.
> $>
> $> I guess it's too late to train him to accept lower
> $> standards--at least until he is old enough that the more
> $> expensive stuff will fit for more than six months.
> $>
> $
> $ Eh, he's a good kid. And besides, the Pokemon shirt was all sold out.
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> news:i7tbb49e2hqskj7u9...@4ax.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> Take 'em back to school shopping, that'll fix 'em.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ It fixed me! Now I'm broke and they didn't have the Pokemon shirt
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> To much television for the young one there Peachy.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> The advertisers have taught him how to think, the only thing
> $>> $>> $> him he wants is you're bank balance going to zero.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Eh.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ He didn't want the shirt until he saw it in the store. I don't know
> $>> $>> $how I can prevent him from wanting things he sees in the store, except
> $>> $>> $to never take him to the store.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Since we were at the store shopping for clothes for him, that's not
> $>> $>> $really practical.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Well, the solution is pretty straight forward, if hard to
> $>> $> departments) that sell stuff he likes. And it can't be done
> $>> $> in a blatantly obvious fashion, like taking him into the
> $>> $> women's clothing department in a store like Bloomingdales,
> $>> $> either.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Yeah. Well, considering I AM buying clothes for him, I'd really
> $>
> $> I guess it's too late to train him to accept lower
> $> standards--at least until he is old enough that the more
> $> expensive stuff will fit for more than six months.
> $>
> $
> $ Eh, he's a good kid. And besides, the Pokemon shirt was all sold out.
A moneysaver!!
Just what the physician ordered.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
PV
Aug 29, 2008, 12:53:48 AM8/29/08
to
Cheap shot but once in a while I just can't resist :-)
PV
Aug 29, 2008, 12:54:16 AM8/29/08
to
My bad, not reading for context!
peachy ashie passion
Aug 29, 2008, 7:22:52 AM8/29/08
to
Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
The Doctor
Aug 29, 2008, 9:21:42 AM8/29/08
to
John Fleming
Aug 29, 2008, 10:17:28 PM8/29/08
to
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:22:52 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $PV wrote:
> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> PV wrote:
> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion
> $>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>>>>
> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>>>>>>>
> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>>>>>>>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>>>>>
> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>>>>> Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>>>>
> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>>>
> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>>>
> $>>>
> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> jar on the mantle, I think hard is better.
> $>
> $>
> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>
> $
> $ Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> PV wrote:
> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion
> $>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>>>>
> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>>>>>>>
> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>>>>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>>>>>
> $>>>>> Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>>>>
> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>>>
> $>>>
> $>>>
> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> jar on the mantle, I think hard is better.
> $>
> $>
> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>
> $
> $ Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
subject approaches zero as the number of posts in the thread
goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
of
f(x) = 1 / e^ax
where a is large.
The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
the first one could relate to the subject and the fact a
probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
more exotic like a delta function.
f(x) = infinity for x = 0
f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Kaos
Aug 30, 2008, 3:33:14 AM8/30/08
to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:09:33 GMT, peachy ashie passion
<exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
He's cagy.
And currently in another city.
peachy ashie passion
Aug 30, 2008, 10:56:22 AM8/30/08
to
Wow. You do math for fun?
I'm... baffled, and somehow impressed.
John Fleming
Aug 30, 2008, 11:33:38 AM8/30/08
to
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:56:22 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $John Fleming wrote:
> $> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:22:52 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $PV wrote:
> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>>>>> Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>> jar on the mantle, I think hard is better.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>
> $>> $ Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
> $>
> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $> subject approaches zero as the number of posts in the thread
> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $> of
> $>
> $> f(x) = 1 / e^ax
> $>
> $> where a is large.
> $>
> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $> the first one could relate to the subject and the fact a
> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>
> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>
> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $
> $
> $ Wow. You do math for fun?
> $
> $ I'm... baffled, and somehow impressed.
> $> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:22:52 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $PV wrote:
> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>
> $>> $>
> $>> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>> $>
> $>> $> $>> $>
> $>> $ Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $> subject approaches zero as the number of posts in the thread
> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $> of
> $>
> $> f(x) = 1 / e^ax
> $>
> $> where a is large.
> $>
> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $> the first one could relate to the subject and the fact a
> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>
> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>
> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $
> $
> $ Wow. You do math for fun?
> $
> $ I'm... baffled, and somehow impressed.
I've taken a few math courses along the way.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
peachy ashie passion
Aug 30, 2008, 12:05:09 PM8/30/08
to
Me too. But not voluntarily.
John Fleming
Aug 30, 2008, 12:20:43 PM8/30/08
to
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:05:09 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:56:22 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:22:52 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $>> $PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>> $>>>>> Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
> $>> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>> $>> jar on the mantle, I think hard is better.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $>> $> subject approaches zero as the number of posts in the thread
> $>> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $>> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $>> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $>> $> of
> $>> $>
> $>> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $>> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $>> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>> $>
> $>> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $>> $
> $>> $
> $>> $ Wow. You do math for fun?
> $>> $
> $>> $ I'm... baffled, and somehow impressed.
> $>
> $> I've taken a few math courses along the way.
> $
> $ Me too. But not voluntarily.
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $>> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $>> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $>> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $>> $> of
> $>> $>
> $>> $> f(x) = 1 / e^ax
> $>> $>
> $>> $> where a is large.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $>> $> the first one could relate to the subject and the fact a> $>> $>
> $>> $> where a is large.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $>> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $>> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $>> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>> $>
> $>> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $>> $
> $>> $ Wow. You do math for fun?
> $>> $
> $>> $ I'm... baffled, and somehow impressed.
> $> I've taken a few math courses along the way.
> $
> $ Me too. But not voluntarily.
LOL
You make it sound like someone forced you to take math at
gunpoint. ;)
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
peachy ashie passion
Aug 30, 2008, 12:37:55 PM8/30/08
to
At diploma-point is actually accurate.
No math, no graduate. It's coercion rather than physical violence,
but it wasn't of my own free will.
John Fleming
Aug 30, 2008, 1:44:12 PM8/30/08
to
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:37:55 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:05:09 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:56:22 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:22:52 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $>> $>> $PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> jar on the mantle, I think hard is better.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $>> $>> $> subject approaches zero as the number of posts in the thread
> $>> $>> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $>> $>> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $>> $>> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $>> $>> $> of
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 1 / e^ax
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> where a is large.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $>> $>> $> the first one could relate to the subject and the fact a
> $>> $>> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $>> $>> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $>> $>> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Wow. You do math for fun?
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ I'm... baffled, and somehow impressed.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> I've taken a few math courses along the way.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Me too. But not voluntarily.
> $>
> $> LOL
> $>
> $> You make it sound like someone forced you to take math at
> $> gunpoint. ;)
> $
> $ At diploma-point is actually accurate.
> $
> $ No math, no graduate. It's coercion rather than physical violence,
> $but it wasn't of my own free will.
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $>> $>> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $>> $>> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $>> $>> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $>> $>> $> of
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 1 / e^ax
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> where a is large.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $>> $>> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $>> $>> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $>> $>> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Wow. You do math for fun?
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>
> $>> $> I've taken a few math courses along the way.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Me too. But not voluntarily.
> $> LOL
> $>
> $> You make it sound like someone forced you to take math at
> $> gunpoint. ;)
> $
> $ At diploma-point is actually accurate.
> $
> $ No math, no graduate. It's coercion rather than physical violence,
> $but it wasn't of my own free will.
Technically it could be seen as either way.
On the one hand, it was forced because, if you didn't have
those courses, they would wouldn't give you the diplima.
On the other hand, it was voluntary because you did chose
that particular program of study. If you really didn't want
to take those math courses, you could have enrolled in a
different program that didn't require them.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
peachy ashie passion
Aug 30, 2008, 3:41:49 PM8/30/08
to
Trust me, there ARE no programs that involve less math!
John Fleming
Aug 30, 2008, 6:52:04 PM8/30/08
to
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:41:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:37:55 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:05:09 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:56:22 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:22:52 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> jar on the mantle, I think hard is better.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $>> $>> $>> $> subject approaches zero as the number of posts in the thread
> $>> $>> $>> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $>> $>> $>> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $>> $>> $>> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $>> $>> $>> $> of
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 1 / e^ax
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> where a is large.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $>> $>> $>> $> the first one could relate to the subject and the fact a
> $>> $>> $>> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $>> $>> $>> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $>> $>> $>> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ Wow. You do math for fun?
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ I'm... baffled, and somehow impressed.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> I've taken a few math courses along the way.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Me too. But not voluntarily.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> LOL
> $>> $>
> $>> $> You make it sound like someone forced you to take math at
> $>> $> gunpoint. ;)
> $>> $
> $>> $ At diploma-point is actually accurate.
> $>> $
> $>> $ No math, no graduate. It's coercion rather than physical violence,
> $>> $but it wasn't of my own free will.
> $>
> $> Technically it could be seen as either way.
> $>
> $> On the one hand, it was forced because, if you didn't have
> $> those courses, they would wouldn't give you the diplima.
> $>
> $> On the other hand, it was voluntary because you did chose
> $> that particular program of study. If you really didn't want
> $> to take those math courses, you could have enrolled in a
> $> different program that didn't require them.
> $
> $ Trust me, there ARE no programs that involve less math!
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $>> $>> $>> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $>> $>> $>> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $>> $>> $>> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $>> $>> $>> $> of
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 1 / e^ax
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> where a is large.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $>> $>> $>> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $>> $>> $>> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $>> $>> $>> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ I'm... baffled, and somehow impressed.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> I've taken a few math courses along the way.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>
> $>> $> LOL
> $>> $>
> $>> $> You make it sound like someone forced you to take math at
> $>> $
> $>> $ At diploma-point is actually accurate.
> $>> $
> $>> $ No math, no graduate. It's coercion rather than physical violence,
> $>
> $> Technically it could be seen as either way.
> $>
> $> On the one hand, it was forced because, if you didn't have
> $> those courses, they would wouldn't give you the diplima.
> $>
> $> On the other hand, it was voluntary because you did chose
> $> that particular program of study. If you really didn't want
> $> to take those math courses, you could have enrolled in a
> $> different program that didn't require them.
> $
> $ Trust me, there ARE no programs that involve less math!
Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
interest to you that involve less math?
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
peachy ashie passion
Aug 30, 2008, 7:58:05 PM8/30/08
to
Nope.
Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
The Doctor
Aug 30, 2008, 8:02:01 PM8/30/08
to
In article <qcduk.51$Af3.39@trnddc06>,
He is an engineer!!
The Doctor
Aug 30, 2008, 8:03:16 PM8/30/08
to
The Doctor
Aug 30, 2008, 8:04:00 PM8/30/08
to
In article <8psib494b66705sb4...@4ax.com>,
John would you like to show Peachie around West Edmonton Mall?
John Fleming
Aug 30, 2008, 8:13:57 PM8/30/08
to
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:58:05 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:41:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:37:55 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:05:09 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:56:22 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:22:52 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Edmonton, Canada
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Don we all our gay apparel?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ Oh yum.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I've horrified my children, mind you. But yum.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> with them for each of the next 104 weeks. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ oooh!
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $ All that much more time to traumatize them!!
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> Well, now that depends on what theory you're going by. I can handle
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> jar on the mantle, I think hard is better.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Nah, normal thread drift. No big.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> subject approaches zero as the number of posts in the thread
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> of
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 1 / e^ax
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> where a is large.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the first one could relate to the subject and the fact a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Wow. You do math for fun?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ I'm... baffled, and somehow impressed.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> I've taken a few math courses along the way.
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ Me too. But not voluntarily.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> LOL
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> You make it sound like someone forced you to take math at
> $>> $>> $> gunpoint. ;)
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ At diploma-point is actually accurate.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ No math, no graduate. It's coercion rather than physical violence,
> $>> $>> $but it wasn't of my own free will.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Technically it could be seen as either way.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> On the one hand, it was forced because, if you didn't have
> $>> $> those courses, they would wouldn't give you the diplima.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> On the other hand, it was voluntary because you did chose
> $>> $> that particular program of study. If you really didn't want
> $>> $> to take those math courses, you could have enrolled in a
> $>> $> different program that didn't require them.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Trust me, there ARE no programs that involve less math!
> $>
> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $> interest to you that involve less math?
> $>
> $
> $ Nope.
> $
> $ Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> PV wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:18:30 GMT, peachy ashie passion> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:45:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:10:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:14:50 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $Matthew Kruk wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "Zipperhead" <couple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> news:daee94b2-79c6-430f...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> wrote: $>> $>>> . . . Christmas. :) $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> --
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> John Fleming
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOXdHKDG5Mk
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $> For that you will have to spend four hours of quality time
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>>> Someone after my own heart. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> I've been after your heart for years. Even got a spot on the mantle
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>>> picked out.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Years? And you haven't got it yet?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> Always too many witneses...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>>> Kinda incompetent, aren't you?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> the easy targets quite well, but keep going after more challenging
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> prey. According to Mike Caro, that makes me less competent than a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>> less talented stalker with lower standards.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> So what you are saying is that John's a hard target.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>> Why is that?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>> Would you prefer if she was saying John was easy :)
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> easy has it's merits, but since she's talking about his heart in a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> My bad, not reading for context!
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Yes, the probability that a message's content relates to the
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> goes to infinity, with the greatest drop in probability
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> occurring within the first five to six posts. Essentially .
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Easily modelled by a mathematical function along the lines
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> of
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 1 / e^ax
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> where a is large.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> The fact that there is some probability that a thread after
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> probability has to be between 0 and 1 inclusive are the only
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> reasons we can't model the probability with something a bit
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> more exotic like a delta function.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = infinity for x = 0
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> f(x) = 0 for x ^= 0
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> I've taken a few math courses along the way.
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> LOL
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> You make it sound like someone forced you to take math at
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ At diploma-point is actually accurate.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ No math, no graduate. It's coercion rather than physical violence,
> $>> $>> $but it wasn't of my own free will.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Technically it could be seen as either way.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> On the one hand, it was forced because, if you didn't have
> $>> $>
> $>> $> On the other hand, it was voluntary because you did chose
> $>> $> to take those math courses, you could have enrolled in a
> $>> $> different program that didn't require them.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Trust me, there ARE no programs that involve less math!
> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $> interest to you that involve less math?
> $>
> $
> $ Nope.
> $
> $ Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
get this degree without taking any math courses. I suspect
that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
program probably have similar requirements.
BA Anthropology Honors
Honors in Anthropology
The BA with Honors provides broad training in
Anthropology and an opportunity to undertake
independent work.
Honors in Anthropology requires a minimum of *48 and a
maximum of *60 in Anthropology (at the junior and
senior level). which must include ANTHR 206, 207, 208,
and 209; one of ANTHR 415, 416, 481, or 498; the Honors
Seminar (ANTHR 400); and the Honors paper (ANTHR 450).
A minimum of *12 must be at the 400-level. Students are
encouraged to take *3 in each of the four
anthropological subdisciplines at the 300- or
400-level. The Honors Anthropology program does not
have a minor requirement.
Promotion Requirements - Promotion from year to year
requires a GPA of at least 3.0 with an average of at
least 3.3 in Anthropology courses.
Graduation Requirements - Graduation with Honors in
Anthropology requires a graduation average of at least
3.0 with an average of at least 3.3 in Anthropology
courses. Graduation with First Class Honors requires a
minimum GPA of 3.7 in Anthropology courses beyond the
junior level and 3.5 or better on all courses in the
final year (last *30).
http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/anthropology2/nav03.cfm?nav03=75505&nav02=75128&nav01=75116
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
peachy ashie passion
Aug 30, 2008, 10:51:30 PM8/30/08
to
Ah yes, but...
It specifies that you must also complete the liberal arts stuff -
that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
required it of ALL graduates.
John Fleming
Aug 31, 2008, 12:07:59 AM8/31/08
to
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:51:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:58:05 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:41:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $> interest to you that involve less math?
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $ Nope.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
> $>
> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $> get this degree without taking any math courses. I suspect
> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>
> $
> $
> $ Ah yes, but...
> $
> $ It specifies that you must also complete the liberal arts stuff -
> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $required it of ALL graduates.
I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
snag you. Liberal arts tends to be things like English,
classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
peachy ashie passion
Aug 31, 2008, 5:34:19 AM8/31/08
to
The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
arts stuff. It requires a basic well rounded knowledge, to include a
certain amount of math. Stupid math.
John Fleming
Aug 31, 2008, 9:55:06 AM8/31/08
to
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:51:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:58:05 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:41:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>
> $>> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $>> $> interest to you that involve less math?
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Nope.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $> get this degree without taking any math courses. I suspect
> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $
> $>> $ Ah yes, but...
> $>> $
> $>> $ It specifies that you must also complete the liberal arts stuff -
> $>> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>
> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $> snag you. Liberal arts tends to be things like English,
> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>
> $>
> $
> $ The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
> $arts stuff. It requires a basic well rounded knowledge, to include a
> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>
> $>> $>> $> interest to you that involve less math?
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Nope.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>
> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $
> $>> $ Ah yes, but...
> $>> $
> $>> $ It specifies that you must also complete the liberal arts stuff -
> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>
> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $> snag you. Liberal arts tends to be things like English,
> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>
> $>
> $
> $ The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
> $arts stuff. It requires a basic well rounded knowledge, to include a
> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
At least you are well rounded. :)
Anyway, I'm guessing given your psychology background,
you've probably been exposed to some statistics.
peachy ashie passion
Aug 31, 2008, 8:10:49 PM8/31/08
to
*sigh* Yes.
Something about being required to actually understand research studies.
And conduct them, too. Bleh!
peachy ashie passion
Aug 31, 2008, 8:19:00 PM8/31/08
to
Oh, I'm all sorts of well rounded!
John Fleming
Aug 31, 2008, 9:38:10 PM8/31/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:19:00 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:51:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:58:05 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:41:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $>> $>> $> interest to you that involve less math?
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ Nope.
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $>> $> get this degree without taking any math courses. I suspect
> $>> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Ah yes, but...
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ It specifies that you must also complete the liberal arts stuff -
> $>> $>> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $>> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $>> $> snag you. Liberal arts tends to be things like English,
> $>> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>> $>
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $ The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
> $>> $arts stuff. It requires a basic well rounded knowledge, to include a
> $>> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
> $>
> $> At least you are well rounded. :)
> $
> $ Oh, I'm all sorts of well rounded!
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Ah yes, but...
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $>> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $>> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>> $>
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $ The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
> $>> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
> $>
> $> At least you are well rounded. :)
> $
> $ Oh, I'm all sorts of well rounded!
Now how am I supposed to respond to this without giving you
a reason to whack me on the side of the head?
John Fleming
Aug 31, 2008, 9:41:53 PM8/31/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:10:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> Anyway, I'm guessing given your psychology background,
> $> you've probably been exposed to some statistics.
> $
> $ *sigh* Yes.
> $
> $ Something about being required to actually understand research studies.
> $
> $ And conduct them, too. Bleh!
Now if we could just get some of the decision makers to
actually understand research studies too.
peachy ashie passion
Aug 31, 2008, 10:22:06 PM8/31/08
to
Be brave John, take a chance!
peachy ashie passion
Aug 31, 2008, 10:50:27 PM8/31/08
to
John Fleming wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:10:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> $John Fleming wrote:
>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> $> Anyway, I'm guessing given your psychology background,
>> $> you've probably been exposed to some statistics.
>> $
>> $ *sigh* Yes.
>> $
>> $ Something about being required to actually understand research studies.
>> $
>> $ And conduct them, too. Bleh!
>
> Now if we could just get some of the decision makers to
> actually understand research studies too.
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:10:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> $John Fleming wrote:
>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> $> Anyway, I'm guessing given your psychology background,
>> $> you've probably been exposed to some statistics.
>> $
>> $ *sigh* Yes.
>> $
>> $ Something about being required to actually understand research studies.
>> $
>> $ And conduct them, too. Bleh!
>
> Now if we could just get some of the decision makers to
> actually understand research studies too.
They understand - they have to, because nobody could so reliably
distort the data to support their own points on accident.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 12:23:20 AM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:50:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:10:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $> Anyway, I'm guessing given your psychology background,
> $>> $> you've probably been exposed to some statistics.
> $>> $
> $>> $ *sigh* Yes.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Something about being required to actually understand research studies.
> $>> $
> $>> $ And conduct them, too. Bleh!
> $>
> $> Now if we could just get some of the decision makers to
> $> actually understand research studies too.
> $
> $ They understand - they have to, because nobody could so reliably
> $distort the data to support their own points on accident.
> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $> Anyway, I'm guessing given your psychology background,
> $>> $> you've probably been exposed to some statistics.
> $>> $
> $>> $ *sigh* Yes.
> $>> $
> $>> $ Something about being required to actually understand research studies.
> $>> $
> $>> $ And conduct them, too. Bleh!
> $> Now if we could just get some of the decision makers to
> $> actually understand research studies too.
> $
> $ They understand - they have to, because nobody could so reliably
> $distort the data to support their own points on accident.
LOL
I can still remember someone telling me about the MLA who
was concerned that half the students scored below average on
exams and wanted to know what could be done to improve this.
Actually, I suppose you could do it with a non symetrical
distribution about the mean where the mean is below the
median. However, I'm sure a policy aimed at deliberately
failing a small percentage of the population would go over
like a rock.
Anyway, my understanding is human populations are pretty
symetrical around the mean when it comes to qualities like
intelligence, and so there really is nothing that can be
done to ensure more students score above average on exams.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 12:24:17 AM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:22:06 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:19:00 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:51:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:58:05 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:41:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> interest to you that involve less math?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Nope.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $>> $>> $> get this degree without taking any math courses. I suspect
> $>> $>> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $>> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ Ah yes, but...
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ It specifies that you must also complete the liberal arts stuff -
> $>> $>> $>> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $>> $>> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $>> $>> $> snag you. Liberal arts tends to be things like English,
> $>> $>> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
> $>> $>> $arts stuff. It requires a basic well rounded knowledge, to include a
> $>> $>> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> At least you are well rounded. :)
> $>> $
> $>> $ Oh, I'm all sorts of well rounded!
> $>
> $> Now how am I supposed to respond to this without giving you
> $> a reason to whack me on the side of the head?
> $
> $ Be brave John, take a chance!
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $>> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $>> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ Ah yes, but...
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $>> $>> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $>> $>> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
> $>> $>> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> At least you are well rounded. :)
> $>> $
> $>> $ Oh, I'm all sorts of well rounded!
> $> Now how am I supposed to respond to this without giving you
> $> a reason to whack me on the side of the head?
> $
> $ Be brave John, take a chance!
I'm putting on the body armour first. :)
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 2:32:29 PM9/1/08
to
Scaredy cat!
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 2:37:12 PM9/1/08
to
Yeah - it's never wise to forget there are true idiots.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 2:46:15 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:37:12 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:50:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:10:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Anyway, I'm guessing given your psychology background,
> $>> $>> $> you've probably been exposed to some statistics.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ *sigh* Yes.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Something about being required to actually understand research studies.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ And conduct them, too. Bleh!
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Now if we could just get some of the decision makers to
> $>> $> actually understand research studies too.
> $>> $
> $>> $ They understand - they have to, because nobody could so reliably
> $>> $distort the data to support their own points on accident.
> $>
> $> LOL
> $>
> $> I can still remember someone telling me about the MLA who
> $> was concerned that half the students scored below average on
> $> exams and wanted to know what could be done to improve this.
> $
> $ Yeah - it's never wise to forget there are true idiots.
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Anyway, I'm guessing given your psychology background,
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ *sigh* Yes.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Something about being required to actually understand research studies.
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ And conduct them, too. Bleh!
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Now if we could just get some of the decision makers to
> $>> $
> $>> $ They understand - they have to, because nobody could so reliably
> $>
> $> LOL
> $>
> $> I can still remember someone telling me about the MLA who
> $> was concerned that half the students scored below average on
> $> exams and wanted to know what could be done to improve this.
> $
> $ Yeah - it's never wise to forget there are true idiots.
And just as important to remember that some of them get
elected to public office.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 2:52:32 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:32:29 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:22:06 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:19:00 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:51:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:58:05 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:41:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> interest to you that involve less math?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Nope.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> get this degree without taking any math courses. I suspect
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Ah yes, but...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ It specifies that you must also complete the liberal arts stuff -
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $>> $>> $>> $> snag you. Liberal arts tends to be things like English,
> $>> $>> $>> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
> $>> $>> $>> $arts stuff. It requires a basic well rounded knowledge, to include a
> $>> $>> $>> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> At least you are well rounded. :)
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Oh, I'm all sorts of well rounded!
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Now how am I supposed to respond to this without giving you
> $>> $> a reason to whack me on the side of the head?
> $>> $
> $>> $ Be brave John, take a chance!
> $>
> $> I'm putting on the body armour first. :)
> $>
> $
> $ Scaredy cat!
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $>> $>> $>> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
> $>> $>> $>> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> At least you are well rounded. :)
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Now how am I supposed to respond to this without giving you
> $>> $
> $>> $ Be brave John, take a chance!
> $> I'm putting on the body armour first. :)
> $>
> $
> $ Scaredy cat!
It's called taking reasonable precautions.
After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
typical.
Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
(You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 3:11:10 PM9/1/08
to
Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 4:02:48 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:32:29 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:22:06 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:19:00 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:34:19 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:51:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:58:05 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:41:49 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> interest to you that involve less math?
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Nope.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Seriously, suggest a single program with less math.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> get this degree without taking any math courses. I suspect
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ Ah yes, but...
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ It specifies that you must also complete the liberal arts stuff -
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> snag you. Liberal arts tends to be things like English,
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $ The science thing is a detail in how you gotta complete the liberal
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $arts stuff. It requires a basic well rounded knowledge, to include a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> At least you are well rounded. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $ Oh, I'm all sorts of well rounded!
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Now how am I supposed to respond to this without giving you
> $>> $>> $> a reason to whack me on the side of the head?
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Be brave John, take a chance!
> $>> $>
> $>> $> I'm putting on the body armour first. :)
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $ Scaredy cat!
> $>
> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>
> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>
> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $> typical.
> $>
> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>
> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $
> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> Shouldn't that be, there are no programs that are of
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> While this is a cursory examination, it looks like you could
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> that universities other than the U of A that offer a similar
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> program probably have similar requirements.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $that's how they sucked me into the math before. All of my colleges
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>> $required it of ALL graduates.
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> I would have thunk it was the science requirement that would
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $> classics, second languages, philosophy . . ..
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $arts stuff. It requires a basic well rounded knowledge, to include a
> $>> $>> $>> $>> $certain amount of math. Stupid math.
> $>> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> $> At least you are well rounded. :)
> $>> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Now how am I supposed to respond to this without giving you
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Be brave John, take a chance!
> $>> $>
> $>> $> I'm putting on the body armour first. :)
> $>> $>
> $>> $ Scaredy cat!
> $>
> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>
> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>
> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $> typical.
> $>
> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>
> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $
> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
LOL.
There's just no winning, is there?
If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
head too.
Kaos
Sep 1, 2008, 4:54:13 PM9/1/08
to
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:23:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
wrote:
wrote:
Context matters... if you're comparing the scores in his constituency
to the provincial or national average, I could understand why he'd
want to improve this. It would be seen as "evidence" that the
educational quality in his constituency is better than others.
But if you're saying "This was the average score for students in one
school. Half of them fell below it," then trying to improve that is
pretty much chasing your tail.
>Actually, I suppose you could do it with a non symetrical
>distribution about the mean where the mean is below the
>median. However, I'm sure a policy aimed at deliberately
>failing a small percentage of the population would go over
>like a rock.
AIUI, the scheme of "grading on the curve" has that effect, and it's
accepted behavior in some contexts.
Kaos
Sep 1, 2008, 4:56:35 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:52:32 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
wrote:
wrote:
>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:32:29 GMT, while chained to a desk in
Unless D'Amero ever returns, I'm the local feminazi of edg.general
And recognizing that the 'typical woman' isn't petite earns you a stay
of execution in my books.
Kaos
Sep 1, 2008, 4:58:46 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
wrote:
wrote:
>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
><exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> $John Fleming wrote:
>> $>
>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
>> $>
>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
>> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
>> $>
>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
>> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
>> $> typical.
>> $>
>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
>> $>
>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
>> $
>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
>
>LOL.
>
>There's just no winning, is there?
>
>If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
>
>If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
>
>I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
>head too.
There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you
more aware of that :p
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 5:06:02 PM9/1/08
to
The idea that you get whacked on the head for boldness is purely your
own creation. I am not responsible for it.
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 5:08:30 PM9/1/08
to
He talks a lot of things that suggest knowledge he then doesn't seem
to have. It's confused me more than once.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 5:41:07 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:54:13 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:23:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:50:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:23:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:50:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>I can still remember someone telling me about the MLA who
> $>was concerned that half the students scored below average on
> $>exams and wanted to know what could be done to improve this.
> $
> $Context matters... if you're comparing the scores in his constituency
> $to the provincial or national average, I could understand why he'd
> $want to improve this. It would be seen as "evidence" that the
> $educational quality in his constituency is better than others.
> $
> $But if you're saying "This was the average score for students in one
> $school. Half of them fell below it," then trying to improve that is
> $pretty much chasing your tail.
You can raise the average. But that isn't going to change
the fact that half the students will have marks above the
average and half will have marks below the average.
I thnk the MLA's intent was to get more students above the
average and fewer students below the average, and as you
suggest, that is simply chasing your tail.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 5:42:04 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:58:46 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $><exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $>> $> typical.
> $>> $>
> $>LOL.
> $>
> $>There's just no winning, is there?
> $>
> $>If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>
> $>If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>
> $>I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>head too.
> $
> $There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you
> $more aware of that :p
the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $><exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $> typical.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $
> $>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $
> $>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $>LOL.
> $>
> $>There's just no winning, is there?
> $>
> $>If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>
> $>If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>
> $>I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>head too.
> $
> $There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you
> $more aware of that :p
LOL
Yes, but Lady Sally was into doing the whacking, not into
being whacked. ;)
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 5:49:33 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:56:35 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:52:32 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:52:32 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
> $>It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>
> $>After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $>rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>
> $>Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $>typical.
> $>
> $>Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>
> $>(You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $
> $Unless D'Amero ever returns, I'm the local feminazi of edg.general
> $And recognizing that the 'typical woman' isn't petite earns you a stay
> $of execution in my books.
Women come in all shapes and sizes.
While maybe a bit of a simplification, you get regular
sizes, you get plus sizes, you get petite sizes, you get
petite plus sizes, . . ..
Some are tall. Some are short.
Some are slim. Some are fat.
Most are somewhere in between.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 5:49:59 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:08:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $Kaos wrote:
> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $> wrote:
> $>
> $>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>>> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $>>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>>> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $>>> $> typical.
> $>>> $>
> $>>
> $>> There's just no winning, is there?
> $>>
> $>> If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>>
> $>> If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>>
> $>> I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> head too.
> $>
> $> There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $> would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you
> $> more aware of that :p
> $
> $
> $ He talks a lot of things that suggest knowledge he then doesn't seem
> $to have. It's confused me more than once.
> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $> wrote:
> $>
> $>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>>> $> typical.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>>> $
> $>>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $>> LOL.> $>>> $>
> $>>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>>> $
> $>>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $>>
> $>> There's just no winning, is there?
> $>>
> $>> If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>>
> $>> If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>>
> $>> I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> head too.
> $>
> $> There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $> would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you
> $> more aware of that :p
> $
> $
> $ He talks a lot of things that suggest knowledge he then doesn't seem
> $to have. It's confused me more than once.
Like?
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 9:09:39 PM9/1/08
to
More likely he was talking about an average that was not set by the
students in question, a national average or a regional one, and his
quote got taken out of context to use against him.
That's my experience with most incredibly stupid things people say -
they weren't all that stupid IN context.
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 9:17:58 PM9/1/08
to
You tend to use language at times that is suggestive of the BDSM
crowd. Anyone can occasionally send a signal phrase or word that they
don't know as such. But the frequency with which you go there is
occasionally confusing to bystanders.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 9:39:02 PM9/1/08
to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:09:39 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:54:13 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $>> $On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:23:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $wrote:
> $>> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:50:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>
> $>> $>I can still remember someone telling me about the MLA who
> $>> $>was concerned that half the students scored below average on
> $>> $>exams and wanted to know what could be done to improve this.
> $>> $
> $>> $Context matters... if you're comparing the scores in his constituency
> $>> $to the provincial or national average, I could understand why he'd
> $>> $want to improve this. It would be seen as "evidence" that the
> $>> $educational quality in his constituency is better than others.
> $>> $
> $>> $But if you're saying "This was the average score for students in one
> $>> $school. Half of them fell below it," then trying to improve that is
> $>> $pretty much chasing your tail.
> $>
> $> You can raise the average. But that isn't going to change
> $> the fact that half the students will have marks above the
> $> average and half will have marks below the average.
> $>
> $> I thnk the MLA's intent was to get more students above the
> $> average and fewer students below the average, and as you
> $> suggest, that is simply chasing your tail.
> $
> $ More likely he was talking about an average that was not set by the
> $students in question, a national average or a regional one, and his
> $quote got taken out of context to use against him.
> $
> $ That's my experience with most incredibly stupid things people say -
> $they weren't all that stupid IN context.
> $> the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $>> $On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:23:20 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $wrote:
> $>> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:50:27 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>
> $>> $>I can still remember someone telling me about the MLA who
> $>> $>was concerned that half the students scored below average on
> $>> $>exams and wanted to know what could be done to improve this.
> $>> $
> $>> $Context matters... if you're comparing the scores in his constituency
> $>> $want to improve this. It would be seen as "evidence" that the
> $>> $educational quality in his constituency is better than others.
> $>> $
> $>> $But if you're saying "This was the average score for students in one
> $>> $pretty much chasing your tail.
> $>
> $> You can raise the average. But that isn't going to change
> $> the fact that half the students will have marks above the
> $> average and half will have marks below the average.
> $>
> $> I thnk the MLA's intent was to get more students above the
> $> average and fewer students below the average, and as you
> $> suggest, that is simply chasing your tail.
> $
> $ More likely he was talking about an average that was not set by the
> $students in question, a national average or a regional one, and his
> $quote got taken out of context to use against him.
> $
> $ That's my experience with most incredibly stupid things people say -
> $they weren't all that stupid IN context.
You may be right.
Then again, here are a few from former Canadian PM Jean
Chretien -
"I don't know. A proof is a proof. What kind of a
proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof, and when you
have a good proof, it's because it's proven."
"I don't know. What happened? If you don't know, The
cameras were there. Some people came in my way, it
might have been... I had to go, so if you are in my
way, I am walking. So I don't know what happened.
Something happened to somebody who should not have been
there." [After grabbing a demonstrator by the neck.]
Taken in or out of context, politicians as a group do tend
to say some of the craziest things.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 9:42:56 PM9/1/08
to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:17:58 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $John Fleming wrote:
> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:08:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $Kaos wrote:
> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $> wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $>>> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $>> $>>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $>>> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $>> $>>> $> typical.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $>> $>> LOL.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> There's just no winning, is there?
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> $>> head too.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $>> $> would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you
> $>> $> more aware of that :p
> $>> $
> $>> $
> $>> $ He talks a lot of things that suggest knowledge he then doesn't seem
> $>> $to have. It's confused me more than once.
> $>
> $> Like?
> $>
> $
> $ You tend to use language at times that is suggestive of the BDSM
> $crowd. Anyone can occasionally send a signal phrase or word that they
> $don't know as such. But the frequency with which you go there is
> $occasionally confusing to bystanders.
> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:08:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $Kaos wrote:
> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $> wrote:
> $>> $>
> $>> $>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion> $>> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $>>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $>>> $> typical.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> LOL.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> There's just no winning, is there?
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> $>
> $>> $> There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $>> $> more aware of that :p
> $>> $
> $>> $
> $>> $ He talks a lot of things that suggest knowledge he then doesn't seem
> $>
> $> Like?
> $>
> $
> $ You tend to use language at times that is suggestive of the BDSM
> $crowd. Anyone can occasionally send a signal phrase or word that they
> $don't know as such. But the frequency with which you go there is
> $occasionally confusing to bystanders.
I did some reading on the BDSM subculture at one point, so I
probably know a bit more about it than the average bear. But
compared with an actual practitioner, I'm really a babe in
the woods.
Kaos
Sep 1, 2008, 9:59:54 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:42:04 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
wrote:
wrote:
>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:58:46 GMT, while chained to a desk in
Oh, of course. But without having someone there who's into the
whacking it's not exactly SSC.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 10:23:05 PM9/1/08
to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:59:54 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:42:04 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $wrote:
> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:58:46 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $>> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $wrote:
> $>> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $><exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $>> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $>> $>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $>> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $>> $>> $> typical.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $>> $>
> $>> $>LOL.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>There's just no winning, is there?
> $>> $>
> $>> $>If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> $more aware of that :p
> $>
> $>LOL
> $>
> $>Yes, but Lady Sally was into doing the whacking, not into
> $>being whacked. ;)
> $
> $Oh, of course. But without having someone there who's into the
> $whacking it's not exactly SSC.
> $wrote:
> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:58:46 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $>> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $wrote:
> $>> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $><exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $>> $> typical.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>
> $>> $>LOL.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>There's just no winning, is there?
> $>> $>
> $>> $>If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> $>head too.
> $>> $
> $>> $
> $>> $There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $>> $would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you> $>> $more aware of that :p
> $>
> $>LOL
> $>
> $>Yes, but Lady Sally was into doing the whacking, not into
> $>being whacked. ;)
> $
> $Oh, of course. But without having someone there who's into the
> $whacking it's not exactly SSC.
Ah yes, safe, sane and consensual. If it's not consensual,
it's assault.
Matthew Kruk
Sep 1, 2008, 10:28:43 PM9/1/08
to
I am getting dizzy scrolling through this ...
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 10:38:15 PM9/1/08
to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:28:43 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
wrote:
the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
wrote:
> $I am getting dizzy scrolling through this ...
We haven't done a good job at trimming posts in this thread,
have we?
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 10:39:09 PM9/1/08
to
And more importantly, it's not the least bit FUN!
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 10:40:57 PM9/1/08
to
Matthew Kruk wrote:
> I am getting dizzy scrolling through this ...
>
>
> I am getting dizzy scrolling through this ...
>
>
ROFL - oh, you are a babe in the woods on the long scrollies.
And then Snarky's sig is so long that my usual tactic of "slide
straight to the bottom" puts me having to scroll back UP!
But, I do like that you fixed the thing you were commenting on,
that's nice!
Matthew Kruk
Sep 1, 2008, 10:41:01 PM9/1/08
to
"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:vn9pb4lmncgdda5q0...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:28:43 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
> wrote:
>
>> $I am getting dizzy scrolling through this ...
>
> We haven't done a good job at trimming posts in this thread,
> have we?
news:vn9pb4lmncgdda5q0...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:28:43 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
> wrote:
>
>> $I am getting dizzy scrolling through this ...
>
> We haven't done a good job at trimming posts in this thread,
> have we?
One brew right now and ding under the table I go :-)
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 10:54:41 PM9/1/08
to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:41:01 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
wrote:
> $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
> $news:vn9pb4lmncgdda5q0...@4ax.com...
> $> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:28:43 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
> $> wrote:
> $>
> $>> $I am getting dizzy scrolling through this ...
> $>
> $> We haven't done a good job at trimming posts in this thread,
> $> have we?
> $
> $One brew right now and ding under the table I go :-)
the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
wrote:
> $news:vn9pb4lmncgdda5q0...@4ax.com...
> $> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:28:43 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
> $> wrote:
> $>
> $>> $I am getting dizzy scrolling through this ...
> $>
> $> We haven't done a good job at trimming posts in this thread,
> $> have we?
> $
> $One brew right now and ding under the table I go :-)
The tanker truck is on its way even as we type. :)
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 10:58:25 PM9/1/08
to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:39:09 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $Kaos wrote:
> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:42:04 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $> wrote:
> $>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:58:46 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $>>> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>>> $wrote:
> $>>> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>>> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>>> $><exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>>> $>> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $>>> $>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>>> $>> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $>>> $>> $> typical.
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>>> $>> $
> $>>> $>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>LOL.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>There's just no winning, is there?
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>>> $more aware of that :p
> $>> LOL
> $>>
> $>> Yes, but Lady Sally was into doing the whacking, not into
> $>> being whacked. ;)
> $>
> $> Oh, of course. But without having someone there who's into the
> $> whacking it's not exactly SSC.
> $
> $ And more importantly, it's not the least bit FUN!
> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:42:04 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $> wrote:
> $>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:58:46 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $>>> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>>> $wrote:
> $>>> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>>> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>>> $><exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>>> $>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>>> $>> $> typical.
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>>> $>> $>
> $>>> $>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>>> $>> $
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>LOL.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>There's just no winning, is there?
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>>> $>
> $>>> $>I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>>> $>head too.
> $>>> $
> $>>> $
> $>>> $There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $>>> $would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you> $>>> $more aware of that :p
> $>> LOL
> $>>
> $>> Yes, but Lady Sally was into doing the whacking, not into
> $>> being whacked. ;)
> $>
> $> whacking it's not exactly SSC.
> $
> $ And more importantly, it's not the least bit FUN!
You're right, if you aren't enjoying yourself, there is
something wrong.
The whole reason for entering into a BDSM relationship is
for all parties to benefit. (I was going to say both, but
in BDSM you don't have to limit yourself to a twosome if
everybody agrees more is OK.)
Matthew Kruk
Sep 1, 2008, 11:14:36 PM9/1/08
to
"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:rmapb45n6h20bmaga...@4ax.com...> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:41:01 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
> wrote:
>> $"John Fleming" <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
>> $news:vn9pb4lmncgdda5q0...@4ax.com...
>> $> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:28:43 GMT, while chained to a desk in
>> $> the scriptorium "Matthew Kruk" <Matthe...@Telus.net>
>> $> wrote:
>> $>
>> $>> $I am getting dizzy scrolling through this ...
>> $>
>> $> We haven't done a good job at trimming posts in this thread,
>> $> have we?
>> $
>> $One brew right now and ding under the table I go :-)
>
> The tanker truck is on its way even as we type. :)
LOL! Under the table and across to the other wall heh-heh.
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 11:28:29 PM9/1/08
to
I think you meant to say:
"In BDSM, just like in the rest of life, you don't have to limit
peachy ashie passion
Sep 1, 2008, 11:29:48 PM9/1/08
to
It's less the expertise that is at issue than actual interest.
Anyone can learn, if they want to. But enjoying... that's not really
learned.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 11:48:33 PM9/1/08
to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:28:29 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $John Fleming wrote:
> $> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:39:09 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:42:04 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $> wrote:
> $>> $>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:58:46 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>>> $wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>>> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>>> $><exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $>>> $>> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $>> $>>> $>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $>>> $>> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $>> $>>> $>> $> typical.
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>>> $>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>LOL.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>There's just no winning, is there?
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> $>>> $>head too.
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>>> $There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $>> $>>> $would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you
> $>> $>>> $more aware of that :p
> $>> $>> LOL
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> Yes, but Lady Sally was into doing the whacking, not into
> $>> $>> being whacked. ;)
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Oh, of course. But without having someone there who's into the
> $>> $> whacking it's not exactly SSC.
> $> You're right, if you aren't enjoying yourself, there is
> $> something wrong.
> $>
> $> The whole reason for entering into a BDSM relationship is
> $> for all parties to benefit. (I was going to say both, but
> $> in BDSM you don't have to limit yourself to a twosome if
> $> everybody agrees more is OK.)
> $
> $ I think you meant to say:
> $"In BDSM, just like in the rest of life, you don't have to limit
> $yourself to a twosome if everybody agrees more is OK."
> $> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:39:09 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $> wrote:
> $>> $>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:58:46 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> the scriptorium Kaos <ka...@xplornet.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>>> $wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>>> $>the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>>> $><exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $>>> $>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $>>> $>> $> typical.
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>> $>>> $>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $>>> $>> $
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>LOL.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>There's just no winning, is there?
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>>> $>I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>>> $There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $>> $>>> $more aware of that :p
> $>> $>> LOL
> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> Yes, but Lady Sally was into doing the whacking, not into
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Oh, of course. But without having someone there who's into the
> $>> $
> $>> $ And more importantly, it's not the least bit FUN!
> $> > $>> $ And more importantly, it's not the least bit FUN!
> $> You're right, if you aren't enjoying yourself, there is
> $> something wrong.
> $>
> $> The whole reason for entering into a BDSM relationship is
> $> for all parties to benefit. (I was going to say both, but
> $> in BDSM you don't have to limit yourself to a twosome if
> $> everybody agrees more is OK.)
> $
> $ I think you meant to say:
> $"In BDSM, just like in the rest of life, you don't have to limit
> $yourself to a twosome if everybody agrees more is OK."
You're right, threesomes (or moresomes?) aren't limited to
BDSM.
When I originally wrote my paragraph, I was originally going
to say both. But then I though, "No, that doesn't sound
right." So that is the context in which I made my
statement.
John Fleming
Sep 1, 2008, 11:55:16 PM9/1/08
to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:29:48 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:17:58 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:08:30 GMT, while chained to a desk in> $>> $>> $Kaos wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $>> $>> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $>> $>>> $> close to queen size, your saying you're "all sorts of well
> $>> $>> $>>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $>> $>>> $> back is any indication, I'm guessing your shape is pretty
> $>> $>> $>>> $> typical.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>>> $ Any whacks you get will be for timidity!
> $>> $>> $>> LOL.
> $>> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> $>> There's just no winning, is there?
> $>> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> $>> If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> $>> If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> $>> I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> $>> $>> head too.
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $>> $>> $> would think your connection to a certain "Lady Sally" would make you
> $>> $>> $> more aware of that :p
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ He talks a lot of things that suggest knowledge he then doesn't seem
> $>> $>> $to have. It's confused me more than once.
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Like?
> $>> $>
> $>> $
> $>> $ You tend to use language at times that is suggestive of the BDSM
> $>> $crowd. Anyone can occasionally send a signal phrase or word that they
> $>> $don't know as such. But the frequency with which you go there is
> $>> $occasionally confusing to bystanders.
> $>
> $> I did some reading on the BDSM subculture at one point, so I
> $> probably know a bit more about it than the average bear. But
> $> compared with an actual practitioner, I'm really a babe in
> $> the woods.
> $
> $ It's less the expertise that is at issue than actual interest.
> $> the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:02:48 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
> $>> $>> $> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:11:10 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $>> $>> $>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> It's called taking reasonable precautions.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> After all, while I don't get the impression you are anywhere
> $>> $>> $>>> $> rounded" could invite a description of pleasantly plump.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> Anyway, if the picture of that top you picked out some time
> $>> $>> $>>> $> typical.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> Maybe not petite, but definitely not grossly overweight.
> $>> $>> $>>> $>
> $>> $>> $>>> $> (You may now give me a whack on the side of the head.)
> $>> $>> $>>> $
> $>> $>> $>> LOL.
> $>> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> $>> There's just no winning, is there?
> $>> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> $>> If I am bold I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> $>> If I am timid I get whacked on the side of the head.
> $>> $>> $>>
> $>> $>> $>> I bet if I'm in between I get whacked on the side of the
> $>> $>> $>
> $>> $>> $> There are some who would see that as a win-win-win situation. One
> $>> $>> $> more aware of that :p
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $
> $>> $>> $ He talks a lot of things that suggest knowledge he then doesn't seem
> $>> $>
> $>> $> Like?
> $>> $>
> $>> $ You tend to use language at times that is suggestive of the BDSM
> $>> $don't know as such. But the frequency with which you go there is
> $>> $occasionally confusing to bystanders.
> $>
> $> I did some reading on the BDSM subculture at one point, so I
> $> probably know a bit more about it than the average bear. But
> $> compared with an actual practitioner, I'm really a babe in
> $> the woods.
> $
> $ It's less the expertise that is at issue than actual interest.
And this is creating confusing you. (I take your comment
about being occasionally confusing to bystandders as being a
proxy statement for it being confusing to you.)
> $ Anyone can learn, if they want to. But enjoying... that's not really
> $learned.
Much as the drill sergeant might say, "you will do pushups
untill you enjoy doing pushups". :)
If you really don't like doing pushups, doing more isn't
necessarily going to change that.
Kaos
Sep 2, 2008, 1:51:29 AM9/2/08
to
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:17:58 GMT, peachy ashie passion
<exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
He's done the research, and for a time played the role. But not
actually delved into the practice.
AFAIK, anyway.
Kaos
Sep 2, 2008, 3:44:03 AM9/2/08
to
Indeed. Though I must admit, from the subby side the *illusion* of
nonconsent can be... interesting.
Kaos
Sep 2, 2008, 3:56:03 AM9/2/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:23:05 -0600, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com>
wrote:
wrote:
>On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:59:54 GMT, while chained to a desk in
Or Gorean.
Well, no. That's still assault.
peachy ashie passion
Sep 2, 2008, 6:50:56 AM9/2/08
to
"interesting" isn't the word I'd have chosen. Careful you are, for
this public venue. :)
Matthew Kruk
Sep 2, 2008, 12:32:37 PM9/2/08
to
My mouse wheel is starting to squeak.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages