Apart from that the complete disregard of human and mammalian evolution is
being compounded with the Silurians referring to hunting down apes, in
300,000,000 BC?
Looks like most people were right about Rory being killed off but the way
it's going it's looking like Amy will also be killed off too as if she never
existed since the crack seems to be coming after her, after which the Dalek
invasion will happen again like it did and everyone will remember and the
Silurians will never return otherwise if Amy doesn't cease to exist the
TARDIS blows up inside the crack. Of couse like I said before it could be
Father's Day in reverse. I think pbowles said that at the start of episode
one Amy refers to her parents but later she says she doesn't have any. So
maybe they were originally supposed to have lived and something happened
which killed them off, like in some alien invasion or other, which caused
the crack to form and set up the Doctor's first meeting with Amy. So the
Doctor and Amy go back in time find out how Amy's parents are killed, with
the Doctor resisting the temptation to change time back since Earth's future
is much better now, but Amy knows that if she doesn't save her parents,
probably allowing the invasion of Earth to occur the TARDIS will be
destroyed along with the Doctor, so she saves them and disappears into the
crack since she can no longer exist in the new time line and the young Amy
grows up without ever knowing the Doctor.
10/10
Thank you Ag.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.facebook.com/dyadallee
In him with nothing but insults resides no wisdom. -unknown
Well this one is because it's a straight lift from one of them. It's
not a general trend.
Also the 11th Doctor seems
> to be incorporating character traits from most of the previous Doctors, with
> the Peter Davison celery reference being the most obvious this episode. I
> wonder how much of the old series Matt Smith had to watch to be able to get
> into character.
None at all. Have you seen Matt Smith in the interviews etc.? He comes
across as being essentially identical in personality and mannerisms to
his character.
> Looks like most people were right about Rory being killed off
I hadn't actually expected that - I'd expected him to leave the TARDIS
this episode, but not quite the way he did.
but the way
> it's going it's looking like Amy will also be killed off too as if she never
> existed since the crack seems to be coming after her,
She's contracted for at least another season. And it now seems it's
the TARDIS rather than Amy the crack's drawn to.
So the
> Doctor and Amy go back in time find out how Amy's parents are killed, with
> the Doctor resisting the temptation to change time back since Earth's future
> is much better now, but Amy knows that if she doesn't save her parents,
> probably allowing the invasion of Earth to occur the TARDIS will be
> destroyed along with the Doctor, so she saves them and disappears into the
> crack since she can no longer exist in the new time line and the young Amy
> grows up without ever knowing the Doctor.
No room for any of that in the story synopses we know for the rest of
the year.
Phil
I was thinking the crack was following the Doctor rather than Amy, but
neither your theory nor mine fits with it being in Amelia's room to start
with.
If they're cracks in time, do they have to show up after the Doctor/
Amy/TARDIS does? The TARDIS turned up next door to the crack even then
- and most of the time we've seen a crack it's been in, behind or next
to one of those characters.
The bigger issue with any of these ideas is The Beast Below - where
the crack appears on a section of the ship's outer hull, somewhere
none of them were or had been present.
Phil
Phil you are on the verge of trolling.
That was a reference to Davison - *not* a character trait...
I
> wonder how much of the old series Matt Smith had to watch to be able to
> get into character.
Why?
>
> Apart from that the complete disregard of human and mammalian evolution is
> being compounded with the Silurians referring to hunting down apes, in
> 300,000,000 BC?
>
> Looks like most people were right about Rory being killed off but the way
> it's going it's looking like Amy will also be killed off too as if she
> never existed since the crack seems to be coming after her, after which
> the Dalek invasion will happen again like it did and everyone will
> remember and the Silurians will never return otherwise if Amy doesn't
> cease to exist the TARDIS blows up inside the crack. Of couse like I said
> before it could be Father's Day in reverse. I think pbowles said that at
> the start of episode one Amy refers to her parents but later she says she
> doesn't have any. So maybe they were originally supposed to have lived and
> something happened which killed them off, like in some alien invasion or
> other, which caused the crack to form and set up the Doctor's first
> meeting with Amy. So the Doctor and Amy go back in time find out how Amy's
> parents are killed, with the Doctor resisting the temptation to change
> time back since Earth's future is much better now, but Amy knows that if
> she doesn't save her parents, probably allowing the invasion of Earth to
> occur the TARDIS will be destroyed along with the Doctor, so she saves
> them and disappears into the crack since she can no longer exist in the
> new time line and the young Amy grows up without ever knowing the Doctor.
Learn some grammar and punctuation. Do you expect anyone to read the
massive wodge of barely comprehensible text?
>
> 10/10
>
You're scoring system is SHIT!
>
No he isn't. You're the only troll here, Yads. Stop flinging your shit
around like a spoiled chimpanzee...
He played it like Davison, and he's done similar stuff with other Doctors
like Tom Baker and Christopher Eccleston.
>
>
>
> I
>> wonder how much of the old series Matt Smith had to watch to be able to
>> get into character.
>
>
> Why?
Because he's playing the part by switching into the characters of the
earlier Doctors and then back into his own.
>
>
>>
>> Apart from that the complete disregard of human and mammalian evolution
>> is being compounded with the Silurians referring to hunting down apes, in
>> 300,000,000 BC?
>>
>> Looks like most people were right about Rory being killed off but the way
>> it's going it's looking like Amy will also be killed off too as if she
>> never existed since the crack seems to be coming after her, after which
>> the Dalek invasion will happen again like it did and everyone will
>> remember and the Silurians will never return otherwise if Amy doesn't
>> cease to exist the TARDIS blows up inside the crack. Of couse like I said
>> before it could be Father's Day in reverse. I think pbowles said that at
>> the start of episode one Amy refers to her parents but later she says she
>> doesn't have any. So maybe they were originally supposed to have lived
>> and something happened which killed them off, like in some alien invasion
>> or other, which caused the crack to form and set up the Doctor's first
>> meeting with Amy. So the Doctor and Amy go back in time find out how
>> Amy's parents are killed, with the Doctor resisting the temptation to
>> change time back since Earth's future is much better now, but Amy knows
>> that if she doesn't save her parents, probably allowing the invasion of
>> Earth to occur the TARDIS will be destroyed along with the Doctor, so she
>> saves them and disappears into the crack since she can no longer exist in
>> the new time line and the young Amy grows up without ever knowing the
>> Doctor.
>
>
> Learn some grammar and punctuation. Do you expect anyone to read the
> massive wodge of barely comprehensible text?
You must obviously be intellectually challenged if you don't understand what
I have said above since it's perfectly clear to anyone with any reasonable
intelligence.
troll anti-Doctor-Who troll john smith.
--
TRolls anti-DoctorWho troll john smith.
--
That describe anti-Doctor-Who troll john smith perfectly.