info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
From ChatGPT, Tom Baker vs David Tennant
19 views
Skip to first unread message
The Doctor
Feb 18, 2024, 8:06:47 AMFeb 18
to
Determining the popularity of two iconic Doctors, Tom Baker as the Fourth
Doctor and David Tennant as the Tenth Doctor, requires a nuanced examination of
their respective eras, contributions to the series, and impact on the fanbase.
Both actors brought unique qualities to their portrayals, resonating with
audiences in different ways and capturing the hearts of Whovians across
generations. Let's delve into the reasons behind the popularity of each Doctor.
Tom Baker as the Fourth Doctor:
Tom Baker's portrayal of the Fourth Doctor from 1974 to 1981 is widely regarded
as one of the most iconic and influential in Doctor Who's history. His tenure
as the Doctor coincided with a golden age for the series, characterised by
imaginative storytelling, memorable companions, and classic villains. Here are
some reasons why Tom Baker's Fourth Doctor remains beloved by fans:
Longevity and Cultural Impact: Tom Baker's seven-year tenure as the Doctor
is the longest of any actor in the role. During this time, he became
synonymous with the character, leaving an indelible mark on the series
and popular culture. His distinctive appearance, including his iconic scarf
and wide-brimmed hat, became instantly recognizable symbols of Doctor Who.
Memorable Episodes and Villains: The Fourth Doctor era produced some of the
most beloved episodes and iconic villains in Doctor Who history. Stories like
"Genesis of the Daleks," "The Pyramids of Mars," and "The City of Death" are
often cited as highlights of the classic series. Baker's dynamic performances
and chemistry with his companions elevated these stories to legendary status.
Quirkiness and Charm: Tom Baker's portrayal of the Doctor was characterised by
a unique blend of eccentricity, wit, and charm. His larger-than-life
personality and unpredictable demeanor endeared him to audiences, making him a
fan favorite for generations of Whovians. Baker's ability to balance humor
with moments of gravitas added depth and complexity to the character.
Enduring Legacy: Even decades after his departure from the role, Tom Baker's
Fourth Doctor continues to resonate with fans old and new. His portrayal has
inspired numerous homages, references, and tributes within the series and
beyond. Baker's status as an ambassador for Doctor Who has helped to keep the
classic era alive in the hearts of fans worldwide.
David Tennant as the Tenth Doctor:
David Tennant's portrayal of the Tenth Doctor from 2005 to 2010 revitalised
Doctor Who for a new generation of viewers. His charismatic performance and
emotional depth endeared him to fans, earning him widespread acclaim and
cementing his status as one of the most popular Doctors in the series' history.
Here are some reasons why David Tennant's Tenth Doctor remains beloved by fans:
Revival of the Series: David Tennant's tenure as the Doctor coincided with the
revival of Doctor Who in 2005, bringing the series back to prominence after a
lengthy hiatus. His portrayal played a pivotal role in reintroducing the Doctor
to audiences and attracting a new generation of fans to the show.
Dynamic Performances and Emotional Range: David Tennant's portrayal of the
Doctor was characterised by his remarkable range as an actor. He could
seamlessly transition from moments of humor and levity to scenes of intense
emotion and vulnerability. Tennant's ability to convey the Doctor's inner
turmoil and moral complexity resonated with audiences,
deepening their connection to the character.
Iconic Episodes and Companions: The Tenth Doctor era produced many iconic
episodes and memorable companions that have left a lasting impact on the
series. Stories like "Blink," "The Girl in the Fireplace,"
and "The End of Time" are often cited as highlights of Tennant's tenure.
His chemistry with companions like Rose Tyler, Martha Jones, and Donna Noble
added depth and emotional resonance to the series.
Cultural Impact: David Tennant's portrayal of the Doctor has had a significant
cultural impact, extending beyond the confines of the series itself. His
popularity helped to elevate Doctor Who to new heights of mainstream success,
earning the show a dedicated fanbase around the world. Tennant's Doctor remains
a beloved figure in popular culture, with his catchphrases and mannerisms
becoming ingrained in the public consciousness.
Conclusion:
While both Tom Baker's Fourth Doctor and David Tennant's Tenth Doctor have left
an indelible mark on Doctor Who and its fanbase, it's difficult to definitively
determine which is more popular. Each actor brought something unique to the
role, resonating with audiences in different ways and capturing the hearts of
Whovians across generations. Tom Baker's Fourth Doctor is beloved for his
eccentricity, charm, and enduring legacy, while David Tennant's Tenth Doctor is
celebrated for his charisma, emotional depth, and cultural impact.
Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective and dependent on
individual preferences and experiences within the vast and diverse Doctor Who
fandom.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
The ignorant won't rest until everyone is as dumb as they are. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com
Doctor and David Tennant as the Tenth Doctor, requires a nuanced examination of
their respective eras, contributions to the series, and impact on the fanbase.
Both actors brought unique qualities to their portrayals, resonating with
audiences in different ways and capturing the hearts of Whovians across
generations. Let's delve into the reasons behind the popularity of each Doctor.
Tom Baker as the Fourth Doctor:
Tom Baker's portrayal of the Fourth Doctor from 1974 to 1981 is widely regarded
as one of the most iconic and influential in Doctor Who's history. His tenure
as the Doctor coincided with a golden age for the series, characterised by
imaginative storytelling, memorable companions, and classic villains. Here are
some reasons why Tom Baker's Fourth Doctor remains beloved by fans:
Longevity and Cultural Impact: Tom Baker's seven-year tenure as the Doctor
is the longest of any actor in the role. During this time, he became
synonymous with the character, leaving an indelible mark on the series
and popular culture. His distinctive appearance, including his iconic scarf
and wide-brimmed hat, became instantly recognizable symbols of Doctor Who.
Memorable Episodes and Villains: The Fourth Doctor era produced some of the
most beloved episodes and iconic villains in Doctor Who history. Stories like
"Genesis of the Daleks," "The Pyramids of Mars," and "The City of Death" are
often cited as highlights of the classic series. Baker's dynamic performances
and chemistry with his companions elevated these stories to legendary status.
Quirkiness and Charm: Tom Baker's portrayal of the Doctor was characterised by
a unique blend of eccentricity, wit, and charm. His larger-than-life
personality and unpredictable demeanor endeared him to audiences, making him a
fan favorite for generations of Whovians. Baker's ability to balance humor
with moments of gravitas added depth and complexity to the character.
Enduring Legacy: Even decades after his departure from the role, Tom Baker's
Fourth Doctor continues to resonate with fans old and new. His portrayal has
inspired numerous homages, references, and tributes within the series and
beyond. Baker's status as an ambassador for Doctor Who has helped to keep the
classic era alive in the hearts of fans worldwide.
David Tennant as the Tenth Doctor:
David Tennant's portrayal of the Tenth Doctor from 2005 to 2010 revitalised
Doctor Who for a new generation of viewers. His charismatic performance and
emotional depth endeared him to fans, earning him widespread acclaim and
cementing his status as one of the most popular Doctors in the series' history.
Here are some reasons why David Tennant's Tenth Doctor remains beloved by fans:
Revival of the Series: David Tennant's tenure as the Doctor coincided with the
revival of Doctor Who in 2005, bringing the series back to prominence after a
lengthy hiatus. His portrayal played a pivotal role in reintroducing the Doctor
to audiences and attracting a new generation of fans to the show.
Dynamic Performances and Emotional Range: David Tennant's portrayal of the
Doctor was characterised by his remarkable range as an actor. He could
seamlessly transition from moments of humor and levity to scenes of intense
emotion and vulnerability. Tennant's ability to convey the Doctor's inner
turmoil and moral complexity resonated with audiences,
deepening their connection to the character.
Iconic Episodes and Companions: The Tenth Doctor era produced many iconic
episodes and memorable companions that have left a lasting impact on the
series. Stories like "Blink," "The Girl in the Fireplace,"
and "The End of Time" are often cited as highlights of Tennant's tenure.
His chemistry with companions like Rose Tyler, Martha Jones, and Donna Noble
added depth and emotional resonance to the series.
Cultural Impact: David Tennant's portrayal of the Doctor has had a significant
cultural impact, extending beyond the confines of the series itself. His
popularity helped to elevate Doctor Who to new heights of mainstream success,
earning the show a dedicated fanbase around the world. Tennant's Doctor remains
a beloved figure in popular culture, with his catchphrases and mannerisms
becoming ingrained in the public consciousness.
Conclusion:
While both Tom Baker's Fourth Doctor and David Tennant's Tenth Doctor have left
an indelible mark on Doctor Who and its fanbase, it's difficult to definitively
determine which is more popular. Each actor brought something unique to the
role, resonating with audiences in different ways and capturing the hearts of
Whovians across generations. Tom Baker's Fourth Doctor is beloved for his
eccentricity, charm, and enduring legacy, while David Tennant's Tenth Doctor is
celebrated for his charisma, emotional depth, and cultural impact.
Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective and dependent on
individual preferences and experiences within the vast and diverse Doctor Who
fandom.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
The ignorant won't rest until everyone is as dumb as they are. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com
Blueshirt
Feb 18, 2024, 3:30:45 PMFeb 18
to
Chat GPT wrote:
> Determining the popularity of two iconic Doctors, Tom Baker as the
> Fourth Doctor and David Tennant as the Tenth Doctor, requires a
> nuanced examination of their respective eras, contributions to the
> series, and impact on the fanbase.
How can any AI generated text be nuanced?
> Determining the popularity of two iconic Doctors, Tom Baker as the
> Fourth Doctor and David Tennant as the Tenth Doctor, requires a
> nuanced examination of their respective eras, contributions to the
> series, and impact on the fanbase.
> Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
> and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
> within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.
that?!!!!
You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of course, it
bumps up the ol' message size stats for you doesn't it?!
The Doctor
Feb 18, 2024, 3:35:16 PMFeb 18
to
Blueshirt
Feb 18, 2024, 4:02:52 PMFeb 18
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <xn0oi8cl...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > Chat GPT wrote:
> >
> >> Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
> >> and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
> >> within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.
> >
> > It took over a hundred lines of text for Chat-GPT to tell us
> > that?!!!!
> >
> > You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of course, it
> > bumps up the ol' message size stats for you doesn't it?!
>
> Can you do better with 50 words?
Easy.
> In article <xn0oi8cl...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > Chat GPT wrote:
> >
> >> Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
> >> and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
> >> within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.
> >
> > It took over a hundred lines of text for Chat-GPT to tell us
> > that?!!!!
> >
> > You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of course, it
> > bumps up the ol' message size stats for you doesn't it?!
>
> Can you do better with 50 words?
When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
broad church.
solar penguin
Feb 18, 2024, 5:39:01 PMFeb 18
to
Blueshirt brought forth for us:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you do better with 50 words?
>
> Easy.
>
> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
> broad church.
>
--
solar penguin
The Doctor
Feb 18, 2024, 8:52:27 PMFeb 18
to
The Doctor
Feb 18, 2024, 8:53:25 PMFeb 18
to
Blueshirt
Feb 18, 2024, 10:11:58 PMFeb 18
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <xn0oi8dh...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <xn0oi8cl...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> > Chat GPT wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
> >> >> and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
> >> >> within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.
> >> >
> >> > It took over a hundred lines of text for Chat-GPT to tell us
> >> > that?!!!!
> >> >
> >> > You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of
> >> > course, it bumps up the ol' message size stats for you
> >> > doesn't it?!
> >> Can you do better with 50 words?
> >
> > Easy.
> >
> > When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
> > subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
> > broad church.
>
> Fail.
I reached the same conclusion - without all the waffle - in three
> In article <xn0oi8dh...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <xn0oi8cl...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> > Chat GPT wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
> >> >> and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
> >> >> within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.
> >> >
> >> > It took over a hundred lines of text for Chat-GPT to tell us
> >> > that?!!!!
> >> >
> >> > You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of
> >> > course, it bumps up the ol' message size stats for you
> >> > doesn't it?!
> >> Can you do better with 50 words?
> >
> > Easy.
> >
> > When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
> > subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
> > broad church.
>
> Fail.
lines... <shrugs>
The Doctor
Feb 19, 2024, 12:36:15 AMFeb 19
to
Daniel65
Feb 19, 2024, 5:32:39 AMFeb 19
to
solar penguin wrote on 19/2/24 9:38 am:
No! It was Jodie Whittaker!!! Though it IS strange that "Yellow Beard
Yadallee" should have been promoting the 13th Doctor via his ChatGPT
garbage!!
--
Daniel
Yadallee" should have been promoting the 13th Doctor via his ChatGPT
garbage!!
--
Daniel
Daniel65
Feb 19, 2024, 5:36:21 AMFeb 19
to
The Doctor wrote on 19/2/24 12:52 pm:
>> The Doctor wrote:=
apparently, came to the same conclusion as YOUR CHATGPT-thingee, "Yellow
Beard Yadallee"??
--
Daniel
>> The Doctor wrote:=
>>> In article <xn0oi8cl...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> Chat GPT wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
>>>>> and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
>>>>> within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.
>>>>
>>>> It took over a hundred lines of text for Chat-GPT to tell us
>>>> that?!!!!
>>>>
>>>> You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of course, it
>>>> bumps up the ol' message size stats for you doesn't it?!
>>>
>>> Can you do better with 50 words?
>>
>> Easy.
>>
>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
>> broad church.
>
> Fail.
>
Why is Blueshirt's effort a FAIL, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", when he,
>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> Chat GPT wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
>>>>> and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
>>>>> within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.
>>>>
>>>> It took over a hundred lines of text for Chat-GPT to tell us
>>>> that?!!!!
>>>>
>>>> You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of course, it
>>>> bumps up the ol' message size stats for you doesn't it?!
>>>
>>> Can you do better with 50 words?
>>
>> Easy.
>>
>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
>> broad church.
>
> Fail.
>
apparently, came to the same conclusion as YOUR CHATGPT-thingee, "Yellow
Beard Yadallee"??
--
Daniel
Blueshirt
Feb 19, 2024, 9:40:53 AMFeb 19
to
ideas?For someone who has been a long-time Doctor Who fan, why not
make his own comparisons?
solar penguin
Feb 19, 2024, 10:40:05 AMFeb 19
to
Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> solar penguin wrote on 19/2/24 9:38 am:
>> Blueshirt brought forth for us:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can you do better with 50 words?
>>>
>>> Easy.
>>>
>>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
>>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
>>> broad church.
>>
>> Broadchurch? Then it must be David Tennant.
>>
> No! It was Jodie Whittaker!!!
The subject line is “Tom Baker vs David Tennant.” No option for
> solar penguin wrote on 19/2/24 9:38 am:
>> Blueshirt brought forth for us:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can you do better with 50 words?
>>>
>>> Easy.
>>>
>>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
>>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
>>> broad church.
>>
>> Broadchurch? Then it must be David Tennant.
>>
> No! It was Jodie Whittaker!!!
Whittaker.
Besides, I don’t think she’s anyone’s favourite Doctor. I don’t even
think she’s anyone’s favourite female Doctor in series 12.
> Though it IS strange that "Yellow Beard
> Yadallee" should have been promoting the 13th Doctor via his ChatGPT
> garbage!!
--
The Doctor
Feb 19, 2024, 11:15:48 AMFeb 19
to
In article <uqvao2$1qpc5$1...@dont-email.me>,
Try reading the above in full Red-bearded Dannyboy!
>--
>Daniel
>--
>Daniel
The Doctor
Feb 19, 2024, 11:16:39 AMFeb 19
to
In article <uqvav3$1qtdc$1...@dont-email.me>,
Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!
>--
>Daniel
>--
>Daniel
The Doctor
Feb 19, 2024, 11:22:51 AMFeb 19
to
In article <uqvsoj$1uimm$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> Though it IS strange that "Yellow Beard
>> Yadallee" should have been promoting the 13th Doctor via his ChatGPT
>> garbage!!
>
>--
>solar penguin
solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> solar penguin wrote on 19/2/24 9:38 am:
>>> Blueshirt brought forth for us:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you do better with 50 words?
>>>>
>>>> Easy.
>>>>
>>>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
>>>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
>>>> broad church.
>>>
>>> Broadchurch? Then it must be David Tennant.
>>>
>> No! It was Jodie Whittaker!!!
>
>The subject line is “Tom Baker vs David Tennant.” No option for
>Whittaker.
>
>Besides, I don’t think she’s anyone’s favourite Doctor. I don’t even
>think she’s anyone’s favourite female Doctor in series 12.
>
She is no Doctor there feather-bearded SP!
>Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> solar penguin wrote on 19/2/24 9:38 am:
>>> Blueshirt brought forth for us:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you do better with 50 words?
>>>>
>>>> Easy.
>>>>
>>>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
>>>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
>>>> broad church.
>>>
>>> Broadchurch? Then it must be David Tennant.
>>>
>> No! It was Jodie Whittaker!!!
>
>The subject line is “Tom Baker vs David Tennant.” No option for
>Whittaker.
>
>Besides, I don’t think she’s anyone’s favourite Doctor. I don’t even
>think she’s anyone’s favourite female Doctor in series 12.
>
>> Though it IS strange that "Yellow Beard
>> Yadallee" should have been promoting the 13th Doctor via his ChatGPT
>> garbage!!
>
>--
>solar penguin
Blueshirt
Feb 19, 2024, 12:41:42 PMFeb 19
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <uqvav3$1qtdc$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote on 19/2/24 12:52 pm:
> >> In article <xn0oi8dh...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > >
> >>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
> >>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who
> >>> is a broad church.
> >>
> >> Fail.
> >>
> > Why is Blueshirt's effort a FAIL, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", when
> > he, apparently, came to the same conclusion as YOUR
> > CHATGPT-thingee, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??
>
> Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!
There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
> In article <uqvav3$1qtdc$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote on 19/2/24 12:52 pm:
> >> In article <xn0oi8dh...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > >
> >>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
> >>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who
> >>> is a broad church.
> >>
> >> Fail.
> >>
> > Why is Blueshirt's effort a FAIL, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", when
> > he, apparently, came to the same conclusion as YOUR
> > CHATGPT-thingee, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??
>
> Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!
posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from Chat-GPT.
So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for failing
to contribute what you think!
The Doctor
Feb 19, 2024, 4:44:40 PMFeb 19
to
In article <xn0oi9mpb...@news.eternal-september.org>,
Welcome to the new world. Are you real or are you artificial?
The Last Doctor
Feb 20, 2024, 3:04:57 AMFeb 20
to
Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
without their white stick and guide dog would you?
Therefore, it is only fair to allow those without brains, intelligence or
opinions to use ChatGPT as a crutch to permit a limited form of thinking
for them.
You go Dave! But to prevent this sort of confusion in future it would be
helpful if you could start your AI generated posts with a disclaimer such
as:
“Please allow ChatGPT to substitute for my thoughts - I am mentally
challenged. Not all disabilities are visible.”
There. I’ve put it in a separate paragraph for you to copy and paste.
Perhaps you could use it as your .sig? Then you’d only have to paste it the
once.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
> The radw village idiot, falsely posting as “The Doctor”, wrote:
>
>> Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!
>
> There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
> posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from Chat-GPT.
>
> So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for failing
> to contribute what you think!
>
You’re being unreasonable. You wouldn’t expect a blind person to be fine
>
>> Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!
>
> There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
> posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from Chat-GPT.
>
> So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for failing
> to contribute what you think!
>
without their white stick and guide dog would you?
Therefore, it is only fair to allow those without brains, intelligence or
opinions to use ChatGPT as a crutch to permit a limited form of thinking
for them.
You go Dave! But to prevent this sort of confusion in future it would be
helpful if you could start your AI generated posts with a disclaimer such
as:
“Please allow ChatGPT to substitute for my thoughts - I am mentally
challenged. Not all disabilities are visible.”
There. I’ve put it in a separate paragraph for you to copy and paste.
Perhaps you could use it as your .sig? Then you’d only have to paste it the
once.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
Daniel65
Feb 20, 2024, 4:26:44 AMFeb 20
to
solar penguin wrote on 20/2/24 2:40 am:
"Broadchurch', which Jodie (also) appeared in!! (Along with David.) ;-P
--
Daniel
> Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> solar penguin wrote on 19/2/24 9:38 am:
>>> Blueshirt brought forth for us:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you do better with 50 words?
>>>>
>>>> Easy.
>>>>
>>>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
>>>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
>>>> broad church.
>>>
>>> Broadchurch? Then it must be David Tennant.
>>>
>> No! It was Jodie Whittaker!!!
>
> The subject line is “Tom Baker vs David Tennant.” No option for
> Whittaker.
VALID, Solar Penguin, but thread drift (by you. ;-P ) had moved on to
>> solar penguin wrote on 19/2/24 9:38 am:
>>> Blueshirt brought forth for us:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you do better with 50 words?
>>>>
>>>> Easy.
>>>>
>>>> When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
>>>> subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
>>>> broad church.
>>>
>>> Broadchurch? Then it must be David Tennant.
>>>
>> No! It was Jodie Whittaker!!!
>
> The subject line is “Tom Baker vs David Tennant.” No option for
> Whittaker.
"Broadchurch', which Jodie (also) appeared in!! (Along with David.) ;-P
--
Daniel
The Doctor
Feb 20, 2024, 9:44:35 AMFeb 20
to
In article <ur1mf5$2db0m$1...@dont-email.me>,
>
>There. I’ve put it in a separate paragraph for you to copy and paste.
>Perhaps you could use it as your .sig? Then you’d only have to paste it the
>once.
>
I always indicate source being quoted from.
>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The radw village idiot, falsely posting as “The Doctor”, wrote:
>>
>>> Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!
>>
>> There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
>> posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from Chat-GPT.
>>
>> So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for failing
>> to contribute what you think!
>>
>
>You’re being unreasonable. You wouldn’t expect a blind person to be fine
>without their white stick and guide dog would you?
>
>Therefore, it is only fair to allow those without brains, intelligence or
>opinions to use ChatGPT as a crutch to permit a limited form of thinking
>for them.
>
>You go Dave! But to prevent this sort of confusion in future it would be
>helpful if you could start your AI generated posts with a disclaimer such
>as:
>
>
>“Please allow ChatGPT to substitute for my thoughts - I am mentally
>challenged. Not all disabilities are visible.”
>
You are pulling a BlueShirt.
>Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The radw village idiot, falsely posting as “The Doctor”, wrote:
>>
>>> Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!
>>
>> There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
>> posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from Chat-GPT.
>>
>> So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for failing
>> to contribute what you think!
>>
>
>You’re being unreasonable. You wouldn’t expect a blind person to be fine
>without their white stick and guide dog would you?
>
>Therefore, it is only fair to allow those without brains, intelligence or
>opinions to use ChatGPT as a crutch to permit a limited form of thinking
>for them.
>
>You go Dave! But to prevent this sort of confusion in future it would be
>helpful if you could start your AI generated posts with a disclaimer such
>as:
>
>
>“Please allow ChatGPT to substitute for my thoughts - I am mentally
>challenged. Not all disabilities are visible.”
>
>
>There. I’ve put it in a separate paragraph for you to copy and paste.
>Perhaps you could use it as your .sig? Then you’d only have to paste it the
>once.
>
>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
In summary, we are too much in love with power and not enough in love with truth. -unknown
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
The Doctor
Feb 20, 2024, 9:49:16 AMFeb 20
to
In article <ur1r8h$2e9b8$1...@dont-email.me>,
Not according to the subject line.
>--
>Daniel
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
>--
>Daniel
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Blueshirt
Feb 20, 2024, 11:13:06 AMFeb 20
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <xn0oi9mpb...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!
> >
> > There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
> > posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from
> > Chat-GPT.
> >
> > So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for
> > failing to contribute what you think!
>
> Welcome to the new world. Are you real or are you artificial?
You're still not contributing to the discussion... just
> In article <xn0oi9mpb...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!
> >
> > There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
> > posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from
> > Chat-GPT.
> >
> > So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for
> > failing to contribute what you think!
>
> Welcome to the new world. Are you real or are you artificial?
side-stepping the point.
Blueshirt
Feb 20, 2024, 11:34:51 AMFeb 20
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <ur1mf5$2db0m$1...@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >
> > Therefore, it is only fair to allow those without brains,
> > intelligence or opinions to use ChatGPT as a crutch to permit a
> > limited form of thinking for them.
> >
> > You go Dave! But to prevent this sort of confusion in future it
> > would be helpful if you could start your AI generated posts with
> > a disclaimer such as:
> >
> >
> > Please allow ChatGPT to substitute for my thoughts - I am
> > mentally challenged. Not all disabilities are visible.
>
> You are pulling a BlueShirt.
There's no need for that sort of talk David!
> In article <ur1mf5$2db0m$1...@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >
> > Therefore, it is only fair to allow those without brains,
> > intelligence or opinions to use ChatGPT as a crutch to permit a
> > limited form of thinking for them.
> >
> > You go Dave! But to prevent this sort of confusion in future it
> > would be helpful if you could start your AI generated posts with
> > a disclaimer such as:
> >
> >
> > Please allow ChatGPT to substitute for my thoughts - I am
> > mentally challenged. Not all disabilities are visible.
>
> You are pulling a BlueShirt.
I do have hands yer know.
Daniel65
Feb 21, 2024, 12:31:49 AMFeb 21
to
The Doctor wrote on 21/02/2024 1:49 am:
> In article <ur1r8h$2e9b8$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> solar penguin wrote on 20/2/24 2:40 am:
<Snip>
> In article <ur1r8h$2e9b8$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> solar penguin wrote on 20/2/24 2:40 am:
>>> The subject line is “Tom Baker vs David Tennant.†No option for
>>> Whittaker.
>>
>> VALID, Solar Penguin, but thread drift (by you. ;-P ) had moved on to
>> "Broadchurch', which Jodie (also) appeared in!! (Along with David.) ;-P
>
> Not according to the subject line.
How often is the *Subject: line* subject to *Thread Drift* , "Yellow
>>
>> VALID, Solar Penguin, but thread drift (by you. ;-P ) had moved on to
>> "Broadchurch', which Jodie (also) appeared in!! (Along with David.) ;-P
>
> Not according to the subject line.
The Doctor
Feb 21, 2024, 9:39:43 AMFeb 21
to
In article <ur41s2$2v9iu$1...@dont-email.me>,
Quite a bit Red-Bearded Dannyboy!
>--
>Daniel
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown
>--
>Daniel
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
0 new messages