S08E02 Into the Dalek

[Agamemnon]

New title sequnece... Still don't like it.

As for the actual episode, brilliant. Best Dalek story since Dalek.

Finally we get to see a full scale space battle with stuff being blown up on
Doctor Who and the Daleks showing their true power and actually doing some
conquering. Also it was reminiscent of Resurrection of the Daleks with the
Dalkes blasting their way into the ship and the suggestion that the Doctor
could have been a copy or duplicate. Obviously references to the Invisible
Enemy as well with the shrunk down Doctor and his companions being injected
into the Dalek.

The assistant again is left to do some problem soving on their own unlike
previous assistants in the new series who just followed the Doctor around
and when not with him were only there for soap opera. Apart from this series
the only instance I can remember when the Doctors companion is challenged is
when Donna uses the stiletto heal of her shoe to knock out a Sontaran.

Don't like all the series arc nonsense. It was bad enough with Bad Wolf
getting repeated over and over again and then Torchwood and then the Silence
inserts and now we have both inserts and repetition of the same phrase. It
all looks likes it's all been stuffed in at the last moment just so they can
claim to have a series arc and the only effect it has is to ruin the
episode.

Danny Pink is introduced for the first time and has obviously got some
back-story to do with him being a soldier and killing a civilian or
non-combatant. Now that is the way to do series arcs, and not that Paradise
rubbish that's being shoe horned in and inflicted on us.

Peter Capaldi is getting into the role now, but it still sounds like the
script was written for Matt Smith, and the exaggerated Glaswegian when he
gets all heated up is a bit over the top and doesn't suit him.

There's also an attempt to point out that the Doctor became the person he is
now after his first encounter with the Daleks on Skaro so the Doctor before
that may have been a different person, especially with the first Doctors
bidding his companions to kill the savage in An Unearthly Child. An other
reference to that story is the school Clara teaches at and when or if Danny
Pink joins the Doctor there will be two teachers travelling in the TARDIS
once again.

The Doctor still hates the Daleks as we found out in Dalek and I was
thinking that it make have been him that was controlling the Dalek travel
machine when it began exterminating all the other Daleks that entered the
ship.

Still Don't trust that Dalek. How does anyone know it wasn't just acting in
order to get itself repaired and where is it off to now? Why didn't the
Doctor send a virus into the Dalek central computer systems to give them all
that particular Dalek's memories? Then again it that's what he did it would
be an obvious rip-off of Star Trek TNG when they did the same with the Borg.

Liked the Doctor Who Extra again.

Looking forward to next week's Robin Hood episode written by Mark Gatiss.

10/10

[The Doctor]

In article <uqidnd5ZG8fTsp_J...@eclipse.net.uk>,

Great Stuff Ag.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
22 Sept 2014 New Brunswick save the province vote Liberal!

[solar penguin]

In article <uqidnd5ZG8fTsp_J...@eclipse.net.uk>, Agamemnon
<agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

>
>The assistant again is left to do some problem soving on their own
>unlike previous assistants in the new series who just followed the
>Doctor around and when not with him were only there for soap opera.
>Apart from this series the only instance I can remember when the Doctors
>companion is challenged is when Donna uses the stiletto heal of her shoe
>to knock out a Sontaran.

What about Amy and Rory? They were often challenged. (e.g. trapped in
the corridors in The Doctor's Wife)

>Danny Pink is introduced for the first time and has obviously got some
>back-story to do with him being a soldier and killing a civilian or
>non-combatant. Now that is the way to do series arcs, and not that
>Paradise rubbish that's being shoe horned in and inflicted on us.

I'm just afraid he'll turn out to be working for Missy, or maybe even be
her in disguise. :( At the very last, does his mysteriously interesting
reading material has anything to do with the arc?

>Why didn't
>the Doctor send a virus into the Dalek central computer systems to give
>them all that particular Dalek's memories? Then again it that's what he
>did it would be an obvious rip-off of Star Trek TNG when they did the
>same with the Borg.

Which was a rip-off of what the Doctor did to the Daleks in "Evil of the
Daleks".

And that, of course, makes nonsense of the Doctor's claim that there's
never been a good Dalek. Has he really forgotten how he created a whole
race of good Daleks!?!

[The Doctor]

In article <lttdvf$ven$1...@dont-email.me>,

The borg are a rip-off of the cybermen.

Nice to see you again SP.

[Agamemnon]

"solar penguin" <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:lttdvf$ven$1...@dont-email.me...

Well that of course begs the question what is good and what is evil and
where do you draw the line dividing them? You can't. It's impissible. One
man's good is another man's evil and it what every suits them at the time.
Look at how the Allies sided with Stalin against Hitler.

What the episode is really showing is that the Doctor is prejudiced against
all Daleks. The Daleks follow their programming or conditioning and that's
what makes them Daleks. If you can break that programming or conditioning
then the Daleks become something different. If the other Daleks find out
that one Dalek is different they will either exterminate it or put it in the
Asylum. The fact that they might put it in an Asylum shows they already have
compassion. The fact that the broken/insane Dalek still wanted to
Exterminate the other Daleks shows that it's programming or conditioning
hasn't changed much. It's just learned to hate something more, other Daleks.

[The Doctor]

In article <itedndDhkMfe-p_J...@eclipse.net.uk>,

Just like REmembrance.

[Andrew M]

On 2014-08-30 20:08:32 +0000, Agamemnon said:

> New title sequnece... Still don't like it.

I rewatched the episode with the colour turned down to black and white
at the suggestion of a comment here (I think) and the titles are way
better. In fact it really works throughout the whole episode

>
> As for the actual episode, brilliant. Best Dalek story since Dalek.
>
> Finally we get to see a full scale space battle with stuff being blown
> up on Doctor Who and the Daleks showing their true power and actually
> doing some conquering. Also it was reminiscent of Resurrection of the
> Daleks with the Dalkes blasting their way into the ship and the
> suggestion that the Doctor could have been a copy or duplicate.
> Obviously references to the Invisible Enemy as well with the shrunk
> down Doctor and his companions being injected into the Dalek.

Agreed. I liked, too, the external reference to "a fantastic idea for a
film". I do think the Daleks are at their best when they are properly
threatening, but I also liked the way that human weapons could, on
occasion, kill them. I have felt, in recent times, that the Daleks
became too powerful, or at least too invulnerable. An indestructible
adversary is never a wise move in plot and story-telling terms.

>
> The assistant again is left to do some problem soving on their own
> unlike previous assistants in the new series who just followed the
> Doctor around and when not with him were only there for soap opera.
> Apart from this series the only instance I can remember when the
> Doctors companion is challenged is when Donna uses the stiletto heal of
> her shoe to knock out a Sontaran.
>
> Don't like all the series arc nonsense. It was bad enough with Bad Wolf
> getting repeated over and over again and then Torchwood and then the
> Silence inserts and now we have both inserts and repetition of the same
> phrase. It all looks likes it's all been stuffed in at the last moment
> just so they can claim to have a series arc and the only effect it has
> is to ruin the episode.

I think the series arc thing is related to the structure of New Who. It
is a not-entirely-happy compromise between the traditions of US science
fiction television (eg Star Trek), where each episode is a different
story, and British science fiction television where - as was the case
with Old Who - the story is told over several episodes. The trouble
with series arcs is that they are meant to give a sense of direction to
the season and build up expectations. If you do that over 12 episodes
the chances are that you will build up expectations to a point where
you cannot possibly deliver.

>
> Danny Pink is introduced for the first time and has obviously got some
> back-story to do with him being a soldier and killing a civilian or
> non-combatant. Now that is the way to do series arcs, and not that
> Paradise rubbish that's being shoe horned in and inflicted on us.
>
> Peter Capaldi is getting into the role now, but it still sounds like
> the script was written for Matt Smith, and the exaggerated Glaswegian
> when he gets all heated up is a bit over the top and doesn't suit him.

The Glaswegian is not exaggerated. That's the way Weegies talk. Trust
me on that. In fact, for many people in my part of the world this is
the first time in more than 50 years that The Doctor hasn't had an
accent

>
> There's also an attempt to point out that the Doctor became the person
> he is now after his first encounter with the Daleks on Skaro so the
> Doctor before that may have been a different person, especially with
> the first Doctors bidding his companions to kill the savage in An
> Unearthly Child. An other reference to that story is the school Clara
> teaches at and when or if Danny Pink joins the Doctor there will be two
> teachers travelling in the TARDIS once again.
>
> The Doctor still hates the Daleks as we found out in Dalek and I was
> thinking that it make have been him that was controlling the Dalek
> travel machine when it began exterminating all the other Daleks that
> entered the ship.

I think that The Doctor finds it sobering that he still hates them so
much that Rusty can't really see past that. Maybe nor can The Doctor.
Is he a good man if he has such hatred?

[Mike Hall]

On 30/08/2014 21:08, Agamemnon wrote:

> Still Don't trust that Dalek. How does anyone know it wasn't just acting in
> order to get itself repaired and where is it off to now? Why didn't the
> Doctor send a virus into the Dalek central computer systems to give them all
> that particular Dalek's memories? Then again it that's what he did it would
> be an obvious rip-off of Star Trek TNG when they did the same with the Borg.

It would also be a rip off of Independence Day but worse. The Daleks
have been fighting virtually everyone in the universe and the Time War.
They use firewalls and don't open dodgy attachments. The big question
is When will The Doctor be turned into a Dalek for real?


Mike Hall
(I avoided the stolen episodes, so if I am right this is just a lucky guess)

[TB]

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 1:08:32 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon wrote:

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

>
> Danny Pink is introduced for the first time and has obviously got some
>
> back-story to do with him being a soldier and killing a civilian or
>
> non-combatant.

I bet that he accidently killed civilians in Iraq or Afghanistan.

[Stephen Wilson]

"Agamemnon" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
news:uqidnd5ZG8fTsp_J...@eclipse.net.uk...

> New title sequnece... Still don't like it.
>
> As for the actual episode, brilliant. Best Dalek story since Dalek.

That's hardly surprising - it was virtually the same story!

[TB]

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1

When the Doctor and company are miniturized, their mass is greatly reduced. Where did the missing mass go?

[The Doctor]

In article <dyxMv.385831$7b1.1...@fx01.am4>,

The Daleks are based on Totalitarian Germany 1933-1945.

[The Doctor]

In article <pNBMv.374033$ZX5.1...@fx32.am4>,

Not really. The Dalek in Dalek becomes a weirdo.

[The Doctor]

In article <pNBMv.374033$ZX5.1...@fx32.am4>,
Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>

Not really.

The Dalek in Dalek just ended up being a weirdo.

[The Doctor]

In article <466c133b-c6ed-424d...@googlegroups.com>,

Conserved somehow using physics.

[The Coca Cola Kid]

"The Doctor" wrote in message news:ltv885$c3g$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

>Not really. The Dalek in Dalek becomes a weirdo.

I thought that he teleported away at the end and became the Emperor that we
saw in 'Parting of the Ways'.
Oh ... so I guess he did become a weirdo.

[Siri Crews]

In article <466c133b-c6ed-424d...@googlegroups.com>,
TB <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:

If you really want to do that, read Asimov's novelisation of Fantastic Voyage.

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Icke's razor: Given two equally plausible explanations, choose the weirder.

[The Doctor]

In article <ltv9pg$ret$1...@speranza.aioe.org>,

Indeed weird stuff.

[pbo...@conservation.org]

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 4:08:32 PM UTC-4, Agamemnon wrote:
> New title sequnece... Still don't like it.
>
>
>
> As for the actual episode, brilliant. Best Dalek story since Dalek.
>
>
>
> Finally we get to see a full scale space battle with stuff being blown up on
>
> Doctor Who and the Daleks showing their true power and actually doing some
>
> conquering. Also it was reminiscent of Resurrection of the Daleks with the
>
> Dalkes blasting their way into the ship and the suggestion that the Doctor
>
> could have been a copy or duplicate. Obviously references to the Invisible
>
> Enemy as well with the shrunk down Doctor and his companions being injected
>
> into the Dalek.

No, it's a reference to the film Fantastic Voyage, which was made explicit in the Doctor's "Great idea for a film" line.

> The assistant again is left to do some problem soving on their own unlike
>
> previous assistants in the new series who just followed the Doctor around
>
> and when not with him were only there for soap opera. Apart from this series
>
> the only instance I can remember when the Doctors companion is challenged is
>
> when Donna uses the stiletto heal of her shoe to knock out a Sontaran.

It's new territory for Clara, but most previous assistants in the new series have done a fair bit on their own - particularly Donna (episodes where she was separated from the Doctor for some time), Martha in a couple of cases (recall she was away from the Doctor for most of the second episode of her season).

> Don't like all the series arc nonsense. It was bad enough with Bad Wolf
>
> getting repeated over and over again and then Torchwood and then the Silence
>
> inserts and now we have both inserts and repetition of the same phrase. It
>
> all looks likes it's all been stuffed in at the last moment just so they can
>
> claim to have a series arc and the only effect it has is to ruin the
>
> episode.

Yes, that was a jarring insert that seemed to go out of its way to say "This has nothing to do with the episode".

>
> Danny Pink is introduced for the first time and has obviously got some
>
> back-story to do with him being a soldier and killing a civilian or
>
> non-combatant. Now that is the way to do series arcs, and not that Paradise
>
> rubbish that's being shoe horned in and inflicted on us.

I suspect he'll turn out to have worked for UNIT in some capacity. I like what I've seen of him so far, but it's too little to really judge.

> Peter Capaldi is getting into the role now, but it still sounds like the
>
> script was written for Matt Smith, and the exaggerated Glaswegian when he
>
> gets all heated up is a bit over the top and doesn't suit him.

After last week I was actively trying to imagine these lines being given to Smith, and in most cases they don't work.

> There's also an attempt to point out that the Doctor became the person he is
>
> now after his first encounter with the Daleks on Skaro so the Doctor before
>
> that may have been a different person, especially with the first Doctors
>
> bidding his companions to kill the savage in An Unearthly Child.

I didn't mind that retrofit - it even made some sense, as Hartnell's character was less callous and more heroic in later stories and Dalek didn't really fit with the way he was portrayed later, when he actively meddled to do what he felt was right rather than for any pragmatic reason. The Doctor of The Daleks wouldn't have challenged the Monk and wouldn't have cared about the Sensorites, for instance.

> Looking forward to next week's Robin Hood episode written by Mark Gatiss.

Looking forward to an episode written by Mark Gatiss? Why? Cold War was okay, but most of his other Who episodes have been mediocre or worse.

[Siri Crews]

In article <55dd864e-2ea3-423f...@googlegroups.com>,

pbo...@conservation.org wrote:

> It's new territory for Clara, but most previous assistants in the new series
> have done a fair bit on their own - particularly Donna (episodes where she
> was separated from the Doctor for some time), Martha in a couple of cases
> (recall she was away from the Doctor for most of the second episode of her
> season).

Souffle girl was Clara, or a version or superposition of her anyways. They're
vacillating behind the impossible girl and another screamer like Jo.

[pbo...@conservation.org]

On Sunday, August 31, 2014 7:00:57 PM UTC-4, Siri Crews wrote:
> In article <55dd864e-2ea3-423f...@googlegroups.com>,
>
> pbo...@conservation.org wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's new territory for Clara, but most previous assistants in the new series
>
> > have done a fair bit on their own - particularly Donna (episodes where she
>
> > was separated from the Doctor for some time), Martha in a couple of cases
>
> > (recall she was away from the Doctor for most of the second episode of her
>
> > season).
>
>
>
> Souffle girl was Clara, or a version or superposition of her anyways. They're
>
> vacillating behind the impossible girl and another screamer like Jo.

Yes, I observed in comments on last week's episode that the pre-companion versions of Clara had more personality than Clara the companion. This week's episode is welcome because Clara comes across more like those characters than the anonymous lackey who's been following the Doctor around for the past year.

[Timothy Bruening]

On Sunday, August 31, 2014 6:54:23 AM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <466c133b-c6ed-424d...@googlegroups.com>,
>
> TB <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >1
>
> >
>
> >When the Doctor and company are miniturized, their mass is greatly reduced. Where did the missing mass go?
>
>
>
> Conserved somehow using physics.

I was hoping that the characters would explain where the missing mass went!

[Timothy Bruening]

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

When Rusty reverted to normal Dalek protocol, the soliders inside it decided to blow it up from the inside with bombs. Why don't they just push their deminiterization buttons and kill the Dalek by EXPANDING inside it? (I figure that the bombs would kill the soldiers anyway).

[The Doctor]

In article <chine.bleu-E3C90...@news.eternal-september.org>,

JO GRant and Clara Oswald comparable?

I have my doubts.

[The Doctor]

In article <7c08bc89-6758-4144...@googlegroups.com>,

REcall The Doctor and Leela in Invisible Enemy.

[The Doctor]

In article <123b9b9c-afc6-4407...@googlegroups.com>,

Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>

>When Rusty reverted to normal Dalek protocol, the soliders inside it decide=
>d to blow it up from the inside with bombs. Why don't they just push their=
> deminiterization buttons and kill the Dalek by EXPANDING inside it? (I fi=

>gure that the bombs would kill the soldiers anyway).

That could get crowded.

[Agamemnon]

<pbo...@conservation.org> wrote in message
news:55dd864e-2ea3-423f...@googlegroups.com...

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 4:08:32 PM UTC-4, Agamemnon wrote:
> New title sequnece... Still don't like it.
>
>
>
> As for the actual episode, brilliant. Best Dalek story since Dalek.
>
>
>
> Finally we get to see a full scale space battle with stuff being blown up
> on
>
> Doctor Who and the Daleks showing their true power and actually doing some
>
> conquering. Also it was reminiscent of Resurrection of the Daleks with the
>
> Dalkes blasting their way into the ship and the suggestion that the Doctor
>
> could have been a copy or duplicate. Obviously references to the Invisible
>
> Enemy as well with the shrunk down Doctor and his companions being
> injected
>
> into the Dalek.

<<<No, it's a reference to the film Fantastic Voyage, which was made
explicit in the Doctor's "Great idea for a film" line.>>>

The Doctor knew what the equipment was so it was also a reference to The
Invisible Enemy where he'd been shrunk down before along with Leela before.
Except that version was a copy whereas Leela was the original, and the
existence of copying was referenced too.

[Agamemnon]

<pbo...@conservation.org> wrote in message
news:55dd864e-2ea3-423f...@googlegroups.com...

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 4:08:32 PM UTC-4, Agamemnon wrote:
> New title sequnece... Still don't like it.
>
>
>
> As for the actual episode, brilliant. Best Dalek story since Dalek.
>
>
>
> Finally we get to see a full scale space battle with stuff being blown up
> on
>
> Doctor Who and the Daleks showing their true power and actually doing some
>
> conquering. Also it was reminiscent of Resurrection of the Daleks with the
>
> Dalkes blasting their way into the ship and the suggestion that the Doctor
>
> could have been a copy or duplicate. Obviously references to the Invisible
>
> Enemy as well with the shrunk down Doctor and his companions being
> injected
>
> into the Dalek.

<<<No, it's a reference to the film Fantastic Voyage, which was made
explicit in the Doctor's "Great idea for a film" line.>>>

[solar penguin]

They had to make Clara as undefined as possible at first as an artificial
way to increase the mystery about the Impossible Girl. (e.g. Could she
really be a splintered Jaggeroth? Or a projection of the TARDIS? Or
River Song's triplet daughters? Or...) As long as she was generic, she
could be anything at all. Now the mystery is solved, she's free to be
her own character.

[The Doctor]

In article <lu0fuo$o09$1...@dont-email.me>,

Under the new Doctor.

[Siri Crews]

In article <123b9b9c-afc6-4407...@googlegroups.com>,
Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

Chekov's gun was never taken off the safety.

[pbo...@conservation.org]

There was a mystery about the earlier ones too, but they were able to define their characters better than Clara the companion.

[solar penguin]

Yes, because we saw less of them. If they'd been recurring characters,
they would've had to be made vaguer to avoid giving anything away.

[TB]

Paval Chekov of the Enterprise was on this episode? Where was he?

[Siri Crews]

In article <addb1206-2ca9-4fec...@googlegroups.com>,

He was on his first assignment on a garbage scow escorting the Botany Bay after
the Enterprise woke it up. That's how he met Khan even though he wasn't yet
assigned to the Enterprise.

[TB]

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

How to make a good Dalek: Fetch Mahatma Ghandi and snag Rusty and bring them to the Aristotle. Miniturize Ghandi and the Doctor and inject them into Rusty's brain. Have the Doctor link Ghandi's mind with that of Rusty so that Ghandi can teach Rusty non-violence.

[Siri Crews]

In article <ed7585d1-832b-4512...@googlegroups.com>,

Gandhi, at least when he was young, was as racist as Daleks.

[Agamemnon]

<<<"TB" <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
news:ed7585d1-832b-4512...@googlegroups.com...

It wouldn't work. Ghandi hated the British and was only non-violent because
he knew he wasn't strong enough to oust them by force. The Dalek would feed
on that just like it fed off the Doctor. Ghandi is also considered by a lot
of Indians to have been a traitor because he allowed the creation of
Pakistan and forced ethnic cleansing. The Dalek would love that.

[The Doctor]

In article <ed7585d1-832b-4512...@googlegroups.com>,
TB <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:

>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>

>How to make a good Dalek: Fetch Mahatma Ghandi and snag Rusty and bring the=
>m to the Aristotle. Miniturize Ghandi and the Doctor and inject them into =
>Rusty's brain. Have the Doctor link Ghandi's mind with that of Rusty so th=

>at Ghandi can teach Rusty non-violence.

Well non-violence would not save the rest of the humans.

[The Doctor]

In article <xZidnWYRhLUzPJjJ...@eclipse.net.uk>,

Gandhi never hated the British. He just hated the occupation of India
by the British.

[TB]

Then hook Rusty into the Dalek collective consciousness.

[�G�l�k Z.L.F Buday AKA The Black Jester #theblackjester]

On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 21:08:32 +0100, in rec.arts.drwho "Agamemnon" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

�New title sequnece... Still don't like it.
�
�As for the actual episode, brilliant. Best Dalek story since Dalek.
�
�Finally we get to see a full scale space battle with stuff being blown up on
�Doctor Who and the Daleks showing their true power and actually doing some
�conquering. Also it was reminiscent of Resurrection of the Daleks with the
�Dalkes blasting their way into the ship and the suggestion that the Doctor
�could have been a copy or duplicate. Obviously references to the Invisible
�Enemy as well with the shrunk down Doctor and his companions being injected
�into the Dalek.

�
�The assistant again is left to do some problem soving on their own unlike

�previous assistants in the new series who just followed the Doctor around
�and when not with him were only there for soap opera. Apart from this series
�the only instance I can remember when the Doctors companion is challenged is
�when Donna uses the stiletto heal of her shoe to knock out a Sontaran.

�
�Don't like all the series arc nonsense. It was bad enough with Bad Wolf

�getting repeated over and over again and then Torchwood and then the Silence
�inserts and now we have both inserts and repetition of the same phrase. It
�all looks likes it's all been stuffed in at the last moment just so they can
�claim to have a series arc and the only effect it has is to ruin the
�episode.

�
�Danny Pink is introduced for the first time and has obviously got some

�back-story to do with him being a soldier and killing a civilian or
�non-combatant. Now that is the way to do series arcs, and not that Paradise
�rubbish that's being shoe horned in and inflicted on us.

�
�Peter Capaldi is getting into the role now, but it still sounds like the

�script was written for Matt Smith, and the exaggerated Glaswegian when he
�gets all heated up is a bit over the top and doesn't suit him.

�
�There's also an attempt to point out that the Doctor became the person he is

�now after his first encounter with the Daleks on Skaro so the Doctor before
�that may have been a different person, especially with the first Doctors

�bidding his companions to kill the savage in An Unearthly Child. An other
�reference to that story is the school Clara teaches at and when or if Danny
�Pink joins the Doctor there will be two teachers travelling in the TARDIS
�once again.
�
�The Doctor still hates the Daleks as we found out in Dalek and I was
�thinking that it make have been him that was controlling the Dalek travel
�machine when it began exterminating all the other Daleks that entered the
�ship.
�
�Still Don't trust that Dalek. How does anyone know it wasn't just acting in
�order to get itself repaired and where is it off to now? Why didn't the
�Doctor send a virus into the Dalek central computer systems to give them all
�that particular Dalek's memories? Then again it that's what he did it would
�be an obvious rip-off of Star Trek TNG when they did the same with the Borg.
�
�Liked the Doctor Who Extra again.
�
�Looking forward to next week's Robin Hood episode written by Mark Gatiss.
�
�10/10
�
�

Think the only thing left is approaching the Novellans and causing their loss, because they were stuck there weren't they?

[TB]

What will Rusty the anti-Dalek Dalek do once all the other Daleks are dead?

[Tim Bruening]

Or use Martin Luther King.

[Daniel60]

On 30/09/2016 6:28 AM, Tim Bruening wrote:
> What will Rusty the anti-Dalek Dalek do once all the other Daleks are dead?
>

Why have you double posted this, Tim?? Anything to get your count up??

Daniel

[Tim Bruening]

Why did it take you so long to complain about my double posting? And where did you find the 2nd posting? I see one dated Sept 28, but not the one dated Sept 30. (Maybe that's one of the deleted messages in that time period).

[The Doctor]

In article <0dc77931-fdb6-450b...@googlegroups.com>,

Delete may not work.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism

Birthdate 29 Jan 1969 Redhill Surrey England

[Tim Bruening]

On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 5:18:56 PM UTC-8, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <0dc77931-fdb6-450b...@googlegroups.com>,
> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sunday, January 15, 2017 at 11:20:01 PM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
> >> On 30/09/2016 6:28 AM, Tim Bruening wrote:
> >> > What will Rusty the anti-Dalek Dalek do once all the other Daleks are dead?
> >> >
> >> Why have you double posted this, Tim?? Anything to get your count up??
> >
> >Why did it take you so long to complain about my double posting? And
> >where did you find the 2nd posting? I see one dated Sept 28, but not
> >the one dated Sept 30. (Maybe that's one of the deleted messages in
> >that time period).
>
> Delete may not work.

Bad news for the Cyberman!

[The Doctor]

In article <a2e48737-fca0-4b97...@googlegroups.com>,

Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 5:18:56 PM UTC-8, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <0dc77931-fdb6-450b...@googlegroups.com>,
>> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Sunday, January 15, 2017 at 11:20:01 PM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
>> >> On 30/09/2016 6:28 AM, Tim Bruening wrote:
>> >> > What will Rusty the anti-Dalek Dalek do once all the other Daleks
>are dead?
>> >> >
>> >> Why have you double posted this, Tim?? Anything to get your count up??
>> >
>> >Why did it take you so long to complain about my double posting? And
>> >where did you find the 2nd posting? I see one dated Sept 28, but not
>> >the one dated Sept 30. (Maybe that's one of the deleted messages in
>> >that time period).
>>
>> Delete may not work.
>
>Bad news for the Cyberman!

It is all on record!

[Tim Bruening]

On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 5:18:56 PM UTC-8, The Doctor wrote:

> In article <0dc77931-fdb6-450b...@googlegroups.com>,
> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sunday, January 15, 2017 at 11:20:01 PM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
> >> On 30/09/2016 6:28 AM, Tim Bruening wrote:
> >> > What will Rusty the anti-Dalek Dalek do once all the other Daleks are dead?
> >> >
> >> Why have you double posted this, Tim?? Anything to get your count up??
> >
> >Why did it take you so long to complain about my double posting? And
> >where did you find the 2nd posting? I see one dated Sept 28, but not
> >the one dated Sept 30. (Maybe that's one of the deleted messages in
> >that time period).
>
> Delete may not work.

On my computer, Google Groups is showing a deleted message between my September 28 post about Rusty and my October 29 post suggesting that Martin Luther King be used to reprogram a Dalek to be good.

[The Doctor]

In article <62514ad1-01c5-4988...@googlegroups.com>,

Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 5:18:56 PM UTC-8, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <0dc77931-fdb6-450b...@googlegroups.com>,
>> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Sunday, January 15, 2017 at 11:20:01 PM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
>> >> On 30/09/2016 6:28 AM, Tim Bruening wrote:
>> >> > What will Rusty the anti-Dalek Dalek do once all the other Daleks
>are dead?
>> >> >
>> >> Why have you double posted this, Tim?? Anything to get your count up??
>> >
>> >Why did it take you so long to complain about my double posting? And
>> >where did you find the 2nd posting? I see one dated Sept 28, but not
>> >the one dated Sept 30. (Maybe that's one of the deleted messages in
>> >that time period).
>>
>> Delete may not work.
>
>On my computer, Google Groups is showing a deleted message between my
>September 28 post about Rusty and my October 29 post suggesting that
>Martin Luther King be used to reprogram a Dalek to be good.

How?

[Tim Bruening]

On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 7:28:31 AM UTC-8, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <62514ad1-01c5-4988...@googlegroups.com>,
> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, January 16, 2017 at 5:18:56 PM UTC-8, The Doctor wrote:
> >> In article <0dc77931-fdb6-450b...@googlegroups.com>,
> >> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Sunday, January 15, 2017 at 11:20:01 PM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
> >> >> On 30/09/2016 6:28 AM, Tim Bruening wrote:
> >> >> > What will Rusty the anti-Dalek Dalek do once all the other Daleks
> >are dead?
> >> >> >
> >> >> Why have you double posted this, Tim?? Anything to get your count up??
> >> >
> >> >Why did it take you so long to complain about my double posting? And
> >> >where did you find the 2nd posting? I see one dated Sept 28, but not
> >> >the one dated Sept 30. (Maybe that's one of the deleted messages in
> >> >that time period).
> >>
> >> Delete may not work.
> >
> >On my computer, Google Groups is showing a deleted message between my
> >September 28 post about Rusty and my October 29 post suggesting that
> >Martin Luther King be used to reprogram a Dalek to be good.
>
> How?

The same way the Doctor was trying, except that MLK didn't hate anyone, so the Dalek wouldn't have any hatreds to latch onto!

[The Doctor]

In article <41526101-e7d0-4dd3...@googlegroups.com>,

Are you certain?

[Daniel60]

First post....
X-Received: by 10.237.53.208 with SMTP id d16mr9719023qte.43.1475121227113;
Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.36.216.9 with SMTP id b9mr38483itg.1.1475121227009;
Wed, 28
Sep 2016 20:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!w41no538587qtw.1!news-out.google.com!w143ni1017itb.0!nntp.google.com!l13no271943itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
*Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:53:46 -0700 (PDT)*
In-Reply-To: <541426ac...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net>
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=2602:306:c45f:9c60:99c1:a0b:81de:8737;
posting-account=-9vEjwkAAAAAl7fAFmEI9nNq0TWjawxm
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2602:306:c45f:9c60:99c1:a0b:81de:8737
References: <uqidnd5ZG8fTsp_J...@eclipse.net.uk>
<541426ac...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8a78b0ac-e834-43b7...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: S08E02 Into the Dalek
*From: TB <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us>*
Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 03:53:47 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Xref: news.eternal-september.org rec.arts.drwho:220421

What will Rusty the anti-Dalek Dalek do once all the other Daleks are dead?

Second post ....
X-Received: by 10.66.85.37 with SMTP id e5mr913621paz.118.1475180912804;
Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.36.17.205 with SMTP id 196mr63453itf.8.1475180912730; Thu,
29 Sep 2016 13:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!l13no555937itl.0!news-out.google.com!203ni1793itk.0!nntp.google.com!l13no555930itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <541426ac...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net>
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=2602:306:c45f:9c60:4fa:6a06:90f8:9f73;
posting-account=0H2MhQkAAACjzm5V7VzdZxt6y7KEcGTO
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2602:306:c45f:9c60:4fa:6a06:90f8:9f73
References: <uqidnd5ZG8fTsp_J...@eclipse.net.uk>
<541426ac...@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ba7b08ac-4332-4e1b...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: S08E02 Into the Dalek
From: Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 20:28:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Xref: news.eternal-september.org rec.arts.drwho:220485

What will Rusty the anti-Dalek Dalek do once all the other Daleks are dead?

From: TB <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us>
From: Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com>
Hmm! Both posts have the same Injection-Date!!

Daniel

[The Doctor]

In article <o5q70s$3ng$1...@dont-email.me>,

Google mucks up yet again.

[Daniel60]

> Google mucks up yet again.
>

Why??

Daniel

[The Doctor]

In article <o62314$frj$2...@dont-email.me>,

No dups should be allowed.

[Daniel60]

But they are not dups, doctor!!

"From: TB <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us>"
"From: Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com>"

So two different messages, with two different originating accounts ....
I thought, as an ISP, you would understand this crap, doctor!!

Daniel

[Tim Bruening]

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 at 1:08:32 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon wrote:

> The assistant again is left to do some problem soving on their own unlike
> previous assistants in the new series who just followed the Doctor around
> and when not with him were only there for soap opera. Apart from this series
> the only instance I can remember when the Doctors companion is challenged is
> when Donna uses the stiletto heal of her shoe to knock out a Sontaran.

So Clara is not a tin dog!

[The Doctor]

In article <7c49d354-15f7-427e...@googlegroups.com>,

I wonder if a Social Media Poll on best to worst
companions would end the argument.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca

Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides

[solar penguin]

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:30:13 +0000, Yads yapped...

> In article <7c49d354-15f7-427e...@googlegroups.com>,
> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Saturday, August 30, 2014 at 1:08:32 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon wrote:
>>
>>> The assistant again is left to do some problem soving on their own
>>> unlike previous assistants in the new series who just followed the
>>> Doctor around and when not with him were only there for soap opera.
>>> Apart from this series the only instance I can remember when the
>>> Doctors companion is challenged is when Donna uses the stiletto heal
>>> of her shoe to knock out a Sontaran.
>>
>>So Clara is not a tin dog!
>
> I wonder if a Social Media Poll on best to worst companions would end
> the argument.

When has any social media poll ever solved any argument ever?

[The Doctor]

In article <ok3ek4$tj$1...@dont-email.me>,

Radio Free Skaro

[Tim Bruening]

On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 2:13:57 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <ok3ek4$tj$1...@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:30:13 +0000, Yads yapped...
> >
> >> In article <7c49d354-15f7-427e...@googlegroups.com>,
> >> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>On Saturday, August 30, 2014 at 1:08:32 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The assistant again is left to do some problem soving on their own
> >>>> unlike previous assistants in the new series who just followed the
> >>>> Doctor around and when not with him were only there for soap opera.
> >>>> Apart from this series the only instance I can remember when the
> >>>> Doctors companion is challenged is when Donna uses the stiletto heal
> >>>> of her shoe to knock out a Sontaran.
> >>>
> >>>So Clara is not a tin dog!
> >>
> >> I wonder if a Social Media Poll on best to worst companions would end
> >> the argument.
> >
> >When has any social media poll ever solved any argument ever?
>
> Radio Free Skaro

What arguments have Radio Free Skaro polls solved?

[solar penguin]

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 21:13:56 +0000, Yads yapped...

> In article <ok3ek4$tj$1...@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:30:13 +0000, Yads yapped...
>>
>>>

>>> I wonder if a Social Media Poll on best to worst companions would end
>>> the argument.
>>
>>When has any social media poll ever solved any argument ever?
>
> Radio Free Skaro

How is that an answer to my question?

[The Doctor]

In article <5c7378b1-b794-411d...@googlegroups.com>,

Listen to their podcasts and find out.

[The Doctor]

In article <ok50cq$1mt$3...@dont-email.me>,

solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 21:13:56 +0000, Yads yapped...
>
>> In article <ok3ek4$tj$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:30:13 +0000, Yads yapped...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if a Social Media Poll on best to worst companions would end
>>>> the argument.
>>>
>>>When has any social media poll ever solved any argument ever?
>>
>> Radio Free Skaro
>
>How is that an answer to my question?

Look At the smaple involed

[Tim Bruening]

The Doctor came THIS close to converting a Dalek to goodness, failing only because the Dalek picked up on his hatred of Daleks, and decided to run with that hatred!

[The Doctor]

In article <5435423d-1596-46df...@googlegroups.com>,

Yawn!

[Tim Bruening]

The Doctor says that Daleks need protein, so harvest it from their victims.

[The Doctor]

In article <7053356c-322e-41fa...@googlegroups.com>,

Tim Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The Doctor says that Daleks need protein, so harvest it from their victims.

Beware!!

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism

Happy Christmas 2017 and Merry New Year 2018

[Timothy Bruening]

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 at 1:08:32 PM UTC-7, Agamemnon wrote:
>

> Still Don't trust that Dalek. How does anyone know it wasn't just acting in
> order to get itself repaired and where is it off to now? Why didn't the
> Doctor send a virus into the Dalek central computer systems to give them all
> that particular Dalek's memories? Then again it that's what he did it would
> be an obvious rip-off of Star Trek TNG when they did the same with the Borg.

Evoking a law suit?

[Timothy Bruening]

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 at 1:59:27 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
> In article <uqidnd5ZG8fTsp_J...@eclipse.net.uk>, Agamemnon

> <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>
> >Why didn't
> >the Doctor send a virus into the Dalek central computer systems to give
> >them all that particular Dalek's memories? Then again it that's what he
> >did it would be an obvious rip-off of Star Trek TNG when they did the
> >same with the Borg.
>

> Which was a rip-off of what the Doctor did to the Daleks in "Evil of the
> Daleks".
>
> And that, of course, makes nonsense of the Doctor's claim that there's
> never been a good Dalek. Has he really forgotten how he created a whole
> race of good Daleks!?!

Why can't the Doctor do it again?

[Timothy Bruening]

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 at 1:59:27 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
> In article <uqidnd5ZG8fTsp_J...@eclipse.net.uk>, Agamemnon
> <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>
> >

> >The assistant again is left to do some problem soving on their own
> >unlike previous assistants in the new series who just followed the
> >Doctor around and when not with him were only there for soap opera.
> >Apart from this series the only instance I can remember when the Doctors
> >companion is challenged is when Donna uses the stiletto heal of her shoe
> >to knock out a Sontaran.
>

> What about Amy and Rory? They were often challenged. (e.g. trapped in
> the corridors in The Doctor's Wife)
>
> >Danny Pink is introduced for the first time and has obviously got some
> >back-story to do with him being a soldier and killing a civilian or
> >non-combatant. Now that is the way to do series arcs, and not that
> >Paradise rubbish that's being shoe horned in and inflicted on us.
>
> I'm just afraid he'll turn out to be working for Missy, or maybe even be
> her in disguise. :( At the very last, does his mysteriously interesting
> reading material has anything to do with the arc?

>
> >Why didn't
> >the Doctor send a virus into the Dalek central computer systems to give
> >them all that particular Dalek's memories? Then again it that's what he
> >did it would be an obvious rip-off of Star Trek TNG when they did the
> >same with the Borg.
>
> Which was a rip-off of what the Doctor did to the Daleks in "Evil of the
> Daleks".
>
> And that, of course, makes nonsense of the Doctor's claim that there's
> never been a good Dalek. Has he really forgotten how he created a whole
> race of good Daleks!?!

I have seen the Doc forget his meetings with future selves.

[The Doctor]

In article <7626e2ab-6ba1-42ec...@googlegroups.com>,

Possible.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism

It is easier to stay out than get out. -Mark Twain

[The Doctor]

In article <73fc035f-288a-4f00...@googlegroups.com>,

All ready did.

[The Doctor]

In article <36b37e66-d496-4a11...@googlegroups.com>,

How?

[Daniel60]

On #2 #3, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <73fc035f-288a-4f00...@googlegroups.com>,
> Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, August 30, 2014 at 1:59:27 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>> In article <uqidnd5ZG8fTsp_J...@eclipse.net.uk>, Agamemnon
>>> <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why didn't
>>>> the Doctor send a virus into the Dalek central computer systems to give
>>>> them all that particular Dalek's memories? Then again it that's what he
>>>> did it would be an obvious rip-off of Star Trek TNG when they did the
>>>> same with the Borg.
>>>
>>> Which was a rip-off of what the Doctor did to the Daleks in "Evil of the
>>> Daleks".
>>>
>>> And that, of course, makes nonsense of the Doctor's claim that there's
>>> never been a good Dalek. Has he really forgotten how he created a whole
>>> race of good Daleks!?!
>>
>> Why can't the Doctor do it again?
>
> All ready did.
>

What is that response to Tim's question supposed to mean, idiot??

--
Daniel

[Pudentame]

What makes you think it has any meaning?

[Daniel60]

Yes, you could be right in that I might be being too hopeful in
expecting the idiot to make any sense what-so-ever, ... but I can live
in hope, can't I??

--
Daniel

[The Doctor]

In article <p7gc45$rq4$2...@dont-email.me>,

Daniel60 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>On #2 #3, Pudentame wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 21:55:14 +1100, Daniel60
>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On #2 #3, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <73fc035f-288a-4f00...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Why can't the Doctor do it again?
>>>>
>>>> All ready did.
>>>>
>>> What is that response to Tim's question supposed to mean, idiot??
>>
>> What makes you think it has any meaning?
>>
>Yes, you could be right in that I might be being too hopeful in
>expecting the idiot to make any sense what-so-ever, ... but I can live
>in hope, can't I??
>
>--
>Daniel

As usual.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism

To make pleasures pleasant, shorten them. -Charles Buxton

[Timothy Bruening]

Into The Dalek: Pun on "Into the Woods?

[Timothy Bruening]

On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 1:56:15 AM UTC-7, Siri Crews wrote:
> In article <ed7585d1-832b-4512...@googlegroups.com>,
> TB <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> > 1
> >
> > How to make a good Dalek: Fetch Mahatma Ghandi and snag Rusty and bring them
> > to the Aristotle. Miniturize Ghandi and the Doctor and inject them into
> > Rusty's brain. Have the Doctor link Ghandi's mind with that of Rusty so that
> > Ghandi can teach Rusty non-violence.
>
> Gandhi, at least when he was young, was as racist as Daleks.

Did he screech "Ex-ter-min-ate!"?

[Timothy Bruening]

On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 3:53:32 AM UTC-7, Agamemnon wrote:
> <<<"TB" <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> news:ed7585d1-832b-4512...@googlegroups.com...

> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
> 1
>
> How to make a good Dalek: Fetch Mahatma Ghandi and snag Rusty and bring them
> to the Aristotle. Miniturize Ghandi and the Doctor and inject them into
> Rusty's brain. Have the Doctor link Ghandi's mind with that of Rusty so
> that Ghandi can teach Rusty non-violence.>>>
>

> It wouldn't work. Ghandi hated the British and was only non-violent because
> he knew he wasn't strong enough to oust them by force. The Dalek would feed
> on that just like it fed off the Doctor. Ghandi is also considered by a lot
> of Indians to have been a traitor because he allowed the creation of
> Pakistan and forced ethnic cleansing. The Dalek would love that.

I now nominate Martin Luther King for Dalek taming duty.

[Timothy Bruening]

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 at 1:59:27 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
> In article <uqidnd5ZG8fTsp_J...@eclipse.net.uk>, Agamemnon
> <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

> >Why didn't
> >the Doctor send a virus into the Dalek central computer systems to give
> >them all that particular Dalek's memories? Then again it that's what he
> >did it would be an obvious rip-off of Star Trek TNG when they did the
> >same with the Borg.
>
> Which was a rip-off of what the Doctor did to the Daleks in "Evil of the
> Daleks".
>
> And that, of course, makes nonsense of the Doctor's claim that there's
> never been a good Dalek. Has he really forgotten how he created a whole
> race of good Daleks!?!

Did any "good Daleks" survive the civil war post EotD?

[The Doctor]

In article <f74dce44-7d23-4b43...@googlegroups.com>,

No.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism

You can't have everything. Where would you put it? -Steven Wright

[The Doctor]

In article <46ab9075-6a8c-4d68...@googlegroups.com>,

Out of order!

[The Doctor]

In article <6d01a97a-41a5-4e15...@googlegroups.com>,

Who knows.

They go back to look for Davros to find a
way to victory against the Movellans.

[Timothy Bruening]

But he seems peaceful enough to tame a Dalek!

[The Doctor]

In article <9b58d3c5-39fe-4487...@googlegroups.com>,

Out of order!!

[Timothy Bruening]

Dalai Lama and Desmond Tutu.

[Timothy Bruening]

OOO?

[The Doctor]

In article <d4f35f4b-96e8-4c42...@googlegroups.com>,

Otu of order.

[The Doctor]

In article <ca0a9fcc-a5c5-4fe3...@googlegroups.com>,

Stop spamtrolling rec.arts.drwho Tim!!

You are making enemies!!

You are showing yourself to be anti-social.

[Timothy Bruening]

Title inspired by "Into The Dalek".

[Timothy Bruening]

On Friday, March 30, 2018 at 8:10:30 AM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:

Why?

[The Doctor]

In article <820c6c91-a9b1-461d...@googlegroups.com>,

Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Title inspired by "Into The Dalek".

Huh?

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism

It is through creating, not possessing, that life is revealed. -Vida D. Scudder

[The Doctor]

In article <562fa012-e164-4723...@googlegroups.com>,

Chibnall is messing things up.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism

[Timothy Bruening]

On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 8:05:40 PM UTC-7, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <820c6c91-a9b1-461d...@googlegroups.com>,
> Timothy Bruening <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Title inspired by "Into The Dalek".
>
> Huh?

Into The Woods.