"Agamemnon" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
news:Oe6dnWsCz8EsxN7M...@eclipse.net.uk...
> "Charles E. Hardwidge" <nos...@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:khv9p7$a9j$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>> Maybe it's me but I feel there's too many egos with too many agendas
>> around today. Everyone wants to be the big chief - an obnoxious cocktail
>> of the class system and the school playground. It's very immature.
>
> The problem is down to the fact that British management is so incompetent
> that it's incapable of delegating responsibility or carrying out the roles
> that they might have been delegated. It's like a school football team were
> every player tries to go for the ball at the same time and they all bunch
> together and run in unison after it instead of staying in their designated
> positions and doing what they're best at so they're always letting in easy
> goals and are unable to score themselves because they always pass the ball
> to their best friends and not to someone whose in a better position to get
> a goal or not being marked.
>
> Doctor Who can't be run properly by 3 executive producers taking a vote on
> everything. Moffat is the only one who has any clue about the show or the
> way it's going and he's therefore top dog. He should be left alone to get
> on with his job and when it comes to editing scripts that's the job of the
> script editor to do themselves not for them to have to cower down to
> Moffat or RTD before that for their approval on every single change which
> basically means nothing gets changed at all. The same goes for other
> departments like costume, make-up and special effects. You can't have the
> costume department telling whoever's doing sound effects how they should
> be made and making-up, lighting, and scenery backing them up in a vote but
> this is exactly how production meetings end up going. Complete
> incompetence.
I think some men just need to grow up and get a sense of context which they
are either not taught in school or biologically incapable of. Women? They
can prop up the establishment and not always get that life isn't a perpetual
invitation for a group meeting. Case studies suggest this gender confusion
happens in organisations with monopoly funding...
As an experiment:
If you walk into a room and look like a man you will be treated like a man.
Be a dick and backslap and you're in the club. Tell the men you were
actually born a woman and they will stop taking your opinion seriously and
be snotty if you dare to have one. Women will look visibly confused not
because of how you look but if your behaviour doesn't default to stability
and consensus. God help you if you say something controversial to the group
mind because ALL the women will jump on you in 1/1000th of a second ALL at
the same time which they wouldn't have done before.
This kinda thing is interesting because it shows up how people live in
almost entirely different parallel worlds. They just don't notice because
they're so used to living within the bubble they're born into.
I dunno...
I think you're right about British management. The US *gets* leadership and
teamwork so you can have a strong director *and* writing team. There's also
a much higher quality of programming and gender equality in the market. The
UK? Ugh. The new shows which are aping America are really mediocre and the
Moffat and Skinner bust up shows how far behind some people are. I just
think it's the rot of the class system and nimbyism playing out. In the end
it does nobody any good and destroys the potential that's there.
--
Charles E. Hardwidge