Star Beast vs Wild Blue Yonder

[The Doctor]

Someone help me out!

Star Beast had more action then intrigue.

WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.

How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?

Am I missing something?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

[anim8rfsk]

The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> Someone help me out!
>
> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>
> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>
> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>
> Am I missing something?

Yes. Each of them is rated nine points too high!

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

[The Doctor]

In article <1652039105.723484367.3...@news.easynews.com>,

anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> Someone help me out!
>>
>> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>>
>> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>>
>> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>
>Yes. Each of them is rated nine points too high!

IYIO.

>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

[The Last Doctor]

The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <1652039105.723484367.3...@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> Someone help me out!
>>>
>>> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>>>
>>> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>>>
>>> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>>>
>>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> Yes. Each of them is rated nine points too high!
>
> IYIO.

The Star Beast was familiar RTD territory - other than the need to resolve
the Doctor-Donna problem, it was an absolutely typical RTD fluff special
episode. Fun but not deep. It just won bonus points by comparison with most
of the past few years.

Wild Blue Yonder was /different/. Not brilliant and not given enough plot
to fill its hour - but it was science fiction. When was tha last time
Doctor Who had an episode built around a single, genuinely SF concept?
Aggie should have been applauding from the sidelines, but sadly his
fascistic obsession with race and colour over a marginal cameo led him off
into an insane rant of “woke degeneracy”.

Personally I didn’t think Wild Blue Yonder was better entertainment overall
than The Star Beast, but that final delightful swan song for Bernard
Cribbins was pure gold and worth 2 points on its own.

So 9/10 for me twice in a row. I don’t expect brilliance from Doctor Who so
I’m happy for it to be fun and coherent - factors that were somewhat
lacking in the Whittaker era.

Capaldi’s run managed it in Series 10 but 8 and 9 largely lacked coherence.
Almost nothing in the modern show, of course, has been as incoherent or
joyless as Sylvester McCoy’s TV tenure.

Now I’m off to listen to “Audacity” so that I’m ready for the 8th Doctor’s
new Christmas audio box set “In the Bleak Midwinter” which was released
today.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

[Blueshirt]

The Doctor wrote:

> Someone help me out!
>
> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>
> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>
> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>
> Am I missing something?

What a question!!!

Do you seriously want an answer?

[Blueshirt]

anim8rfsk wrote:

> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> > Someone help me out!
> >
> > Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
> >
> > WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
> >
> > How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Yes. Each of them is rated nine points too high!

Shock! Horror! Doctor Who fans actually liked episodes of Doctor
Who... what on earth is the world coming to? How can all those videos
on YouTube be so wrong... <rolls eyes>

[Blueshirt]

The Last Doctor wrote:
>
> Now I’m off to listen to “Audacity” so that I’m ready for the 8th
> Doctor’s new Christmas audio box set “In the Bleak Midwinter” which
> was released today.

My evening's listening will be "Dalek Universe Vol.2", the vinyl
version, with a glass of whiskey... after the football on Amazon
Prime of course

[The Doctor]

In article <uknpf9$8l18$1...@dont-email.me>,

9/10 both?

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

[The Doctor]

In article <nnd$1032e0a9$3ba704e1@393240a04931895c>,

YES!

[The Doctor]

In article <nnd$53c6f881$27a76a62@d0ec5fa94412df35>,

anim8 is really odd.

[The True Doctor]

On 05/12/2023 14:52, The Doctor wrote:
> Someone help me out!
>
> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>
> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>
> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>

Because the scores have been rigged.

> Am I missing something?

On Rotten Tomatoes the specials have only got 42% from the audience.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

[The Doctor]

In article <uko8tj$duec$3...@dont-email.me>,

The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 05/12/2023 14:52, The Doctor wrote:
>> Someone help me out!
>>
>> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>>
>> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>>
>> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>>
>
>Because the scores have been rigged.
>

By the audience?

>> Am I missing something?
>
>On Rotten Tomatoes the specials have only got 42% from the audience.
>

How can I vote on there?

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

[The True Doctor]

On 05/12/2023 18:17, Squealer wrote:
> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <1652039105.723484367.3...@news.easynews.com>,
>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> Someone help me out!
>>>>
>>>> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>>>>
>>>> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>>>>
>>>> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>>>>
>>>> Am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Yes. Each of them is rated nine points too high!
>>
>> IYIO.
>
> The Star Beast was familiar RTD territory - other than the need to resolve
> the Doctor-Donna problem, it was an absolutely typical RTD fluff special
> episode. Fun but not deep. It just won bonus points by comparison with most
> of the past few years.
>
> Wild Blue Yonder was /different/. Not brilliant and not given enough plot
> to fill its hour - but it was science fiction. When was tha last time
> Doctor Who had an episode built around a single, genuinely SF concept?
> Aggie should have been applauding from the sidelines, but sadly his
> fascistic obsession with race and colour over a marginal cameo led him off
> into an insane rant of “woke degeneracy”.

So claims Squealer the epitome of the Nazi chief propagandist Joseph
Goebbels.

You and the fascistic Nazi woke far-left are the ones obsessed with race.

Isaac Newton was not an Indian nor did he have any Indian ancestry.

You and others that believe your degenerate woke lies are complete
retards like the people who believed in the visibility of the Emperor's
New Clothes.

Don't insult my or anyone else's intelligence by taunting me to believe
the woke lie that Isaac Newton was of Indian decent.

>
> Personally I didn’t think Wild Blue Yonder was better entertainment overall
> than The Star Beast, but that final delightful swan song for Bernard
> Cribbins was pure gold and worth 2 points on its own.
>
> So 9/10 for me twice in a row. I don’t expect brilliance from Doctor Who so
> I’m happy for it to be fun and coherent - factors that were somewhat
> lacking in the Whittaker era.
>
> Capaldi’s run managed it in Series 10 but 8 and 9 largely lacked coherence.

You must be joking. Capaldi's ratings went down toilet from Series 9
onwards because of the hypocritical woke degeneracy they were filled with.

> Almost nothing in the modern show, of course, has been as incoherent or
> joyless as Sylvester McCoy’s TV tenure.
>

That is an insult. Jodie Whittaker's entire run was worse than anything
in the Sylvester McCoy era due to her non-existent acting ability and
complete miscasting.

> Now I’m off to listen to “Audacity” so that I’m ready for the 8th Doctor’s
> new Christmas audio box set “In the Bleak Midwinter” which was released
> today.
>

In the Bleak Midwinter is where Doctor Who is now. It died on Christmas
Day 2017. The Timeless Child monster has destroyed everything. Whittaker
could be endured. The Timeless Child monster can't. The Doctor is not
Doomsday from DC Comics.

[The True Doctor]

Which us in the UK have to pay £160 for on top of what we have to pay
for Prime so as to be constantly attacked and insulted by vile woke
retards and bigots who want us to believe that Isaac Newton was an
Indian. There are plenty of Indian scientists and mathematicians like
Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar who the bigoted racist woke retard Russell T.
Davies could have had the Doctor meet, but the degenerate racist bigot
has to race swap Isaac Newton instead because in his rotten festering
mind, white British people are not good enough to have him represent them.

[Daniel65]

The Doctor wrote on 6/12/2023 9:34 am:
> In article <nnd$1032e0a9$3ba704e1@393240a04931895c>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> Someone help me out!
>>>
>>> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>>>
>>> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>>>
>>> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>>>
>>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> What a question!!!
>>
>> Do you seriously want an answer?
>
> YES!
>

Well, I could suggest .... "Yes, YOU, asswipe, are seriously missing
something!!".
--
Daniel

[The Doctor]

In article <uko9rf$e3cd$1...@dont-email.me>,

The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

The Timelss Child needs to be purged fro mthe Doctor Who lore!

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

[The Doctor]

In article <ukoa7f$e3cd$2...@dont-email.me>,

The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

>On 05/12/2023 20:10, Blueshirt wrote:
>> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>> Now I’m off to listen to “Audacity” so that I’m ready for the 8th
>>> Doctor’s new Christmas audio box set “In the Bleak Midwinter” which
>>> was released today.
>>
>> My evening's listening will be "Dalek Universe Vol.2", the vinyl
>> version, with a glass of whiskey... after the football on Amazon
>> Prime of course
>
>Which us in the UK have to pay £160 for on top of what we have to pay
>for Prime so as to be constantly attacked and insulted by vile woke
>retards and bigots who want us to believe that Isaac Newton was an
>Indian. There are plenty of Indian scientists and mathematicians like
>Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar who the bigoted racist woke retard Russell T.
>Davies could have had the Doctor meet, but the degenerate racist bigot
>has to race swap Isaac Newton instead because in his rotten festering
>mind, white British people are not good enough to have him represent them.
>

when I saw that, I was like what the hell?!

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

[The Doctor]

In article <ukp2th$kv81$1...@dont-email.me>,

Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 6/12/2023 9:34 am:
>> In article <nnd$1032e0a9$3ba704e1@393240a04931895c>,
>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> Someone help me out!
>>>>
>>>> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>>>>
>>>> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>>>>
>>>> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>>>>
>>>> Am I missing something?
>>>
>>> What a question!!!
>>>
>>> Do you seriously want an answer?
>>
>> YES!
>>

>Well, I could suggest .... "Yes, YOU, %, are seriously missing
>something!!".
>--
>Daniel

[Blueshirt]

The True Doctor wrote:
>
> Which us in the UK have to pay £160 for

Good. Next April you'll be paying even more. So either grow a pair of
balls and refuse to pay for it or shut the fuck up.

[Blueshirt]

The Doctor wrote:
>
> The Timelss Child needs to be purged from the Doctor Who lore!

No Dave, it doesn't... and it won't be.

[Blueshirt]

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 05/12/2023 14:52, The Doctor wrote:
> >
> > How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
> >
>
> Because the scores have been rigged.

So, your opinion, rating and review counts, but when somebody else
has a different opinion and rating... then it's been rigged!!!

<rolls eyes>

[The Doctor]

In article <xn0oa9u75...@news.eternal-september.org>,

It is an albatroos on DW!

[tsbr...@gmail.com]

The Meep: 10/10 for being spoilers:

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Both cute and evil!

[Idlehands]

+1

--
"He who establishes his argument by noise and command shows that his
reason is weak." Michel Eyquem de Montaigne

[tsbr...@gmail.com]

Why couldn't the Meeps be cured?

[Ubiquitous]

In article <uko9rf$e3cd$1...@dont-email.me>, agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM wrote:
> On 05/12/2023 18:17, Squealer wrote:
>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> anim8rfsk <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

>>>>> Someone help me out!
>>>>>
>>>>> Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
>>>>>
>>>>> WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Am I missing something?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Each of them is rated nine points too high!
>>>
>>> IYIO.
>>
>> The Star Beast was familiar RTD territory - other than the need to resolve
>> the Doctor-Donna problem, it was an absolutely typical RTD fluff special
>> episode. Fun but not deep. It just won bonus points by comparison with
>> most of the past few years.
>>
>> Wild Blue Yonder was /different/. Not brilliant and not given enough plot
>> to fill its hour - but it was science fiction. When was tha last time
>> Doctor Who had an episode built around a single, genuinely SF concept?
>> Aggie should have been applauding from the sidelines, but sadly his
>> fascistic obsession with race and colour over a marginal cameo led him off
>> into an insane rant of “woke degeneracy”.
>
>So claims Squealer the epitome of the Nazi chief propagandist Joseph
>Goebbels.

Goodwin's Law violation noted. get back to us when you have a real argument
to make.




--
Let's go Brandon!

[The Doctor]

In article <ul700r$35i3m$3...@dont-email.me>,

I Goodwin you Ubi!

>
>
>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>
>