Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Happy Birthday to Doctor Who
86 views
Skip to first unread message
The Last Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 9:31:51 AM11/23/21
to
59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.
They must be /fought/.
Wouter Valentijn
Nov 23, 2021, 10:04:47 AM11/23/21
to
Op 23-11-2021 om 15:31 schreef The Last Doctor:
--
Wouter Valentijn
Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
http://www.nksf.nl/
liam=mail
>
> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>
:-)
> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>
--
Wouter Valentijn
Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
http://www.nksf.nl/
liam=mail
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 10:32:03 AM11/23/21
to
In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
>--
>There are some corners of the universe
> which have bred the most terrible things.
>Things which act against everything we believe in.
>
>They must be /fought/.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Merry Christmas 2021 and Happy New Year 2022 Beware https://mindspring.com
The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>
>59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>
Not with Chibnall in charge.
>
>59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>
>--
>There are some corners of the universe
> which have bred the most terrible things.
>Things which act against everything we believe in.
>
>They must be /fought/.
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Merry Christmas 2021 and Happy New Year 2022 Beware https://mindspring.com
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 23, 2021, 10:50:46 AM11/23/21
to
2375 2376 2377 2378 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 7:32:03 AM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >
> >59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >
> Not with Chibnall in charge.
And a math error to boot! 2021 - 1963 = 58.
> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >
> >59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >
> Not with Chibnall in charge.
The Last Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 12:07:24 PM11/23/21
to
The True Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 12:59:13 PM11/23/21
to
On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>
> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>
Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>
> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>
is erased from canon.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 12:59:42 PM11/23/21
to
On 23/11/2021 15:32, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>
>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>
>
> Not with Chibnall in charge.
>
Correct.
> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>
>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>
>
> Not with Chibnall in charge.
>
The Adventures of the Timeless Child is not Doctor Who.
>> --
>> There are some corners of the universe
>> which have bred the most terrible things.
>> Things which act against everything we believe in.
>>
>> They must be /fought/.
>
>
--
The True Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 1:02:06 PM11/23/21
to
On 23/11/2021 15:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
mathematics. Their rabid bigotry prevents them from holding an open
mind, and that's what you always need to understand maths and science.
solar penguin
Nov 23, 2021, 2:34:33 PM11/23/21
to
Wouter Valentijn
Nov 23, 2021, 3:43:03 PM11/23/21
to
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 23, 2021, 3:46:00 PM11/23/21
to
2394 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:07:24 AM UTC-8, The Last Doctor wrote:
> On 23/11/2021 15:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 2375 2376 2377 2378 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 7:32:03 AM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
> >> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >>>
> >> Not with Chibnall in charge.
> >
> > And a math error to boot! 2021 - 1963 = 58.
> >
> Well spotted. There's no "edit" button on UseNet, alas.
Do you have a delete post button?
> On 23/11/2021 15:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 2375 2376 2377 2378 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 7:32:03 AM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
> >> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >>>
> >> Not with Chibnall in charge.
> >
> > And a math error to boot! 2021 - 1963 = 58.
> >
> Well spotted. There's no "edit" button on UseNet, alas.
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 23, 2021, 3:50:27 PM11/23/21
to
2395 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:59:13 AM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
> >
> > 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >
> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> is erased from canon.
If the Chibnall Era is erased after Chibnall leaves in 2022, how will the age of Doctor Who be calculated? Would it be 60 or 55 or 54 in 2023?
> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
> >
> > 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >
> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> is erased from canon.
Classic Who ended in 1989 at the age of 26. Doctor Who resumed in 2005. Should we be subtracting 16 years from the DW age to get 42, or subtract 16 from Aggy's age to get 38?
Wouter Valentijn
Nov 23, 2021, 4:32:22 PM11/23/21
to
Op 23-11-2021 om 21:50 schreef tsbr...@gmail.com:
1963 remains as the year Doctor Who first aired. There is no subtraction
there. It remains 58 years ago this year.
Like Star Trek was first aired in 1966. 55 years ago. We don't subtract
the years between 1973 and 1987. Or between 1969 and 1973. Or between
2005 and 2017. That would be silly.
What one can do is count the years seasons were broadcast. But that's a
different number from the number of the actual age, which is counted
from the year it was first broadcast, aka the birth year.
there. It remains 58 years ago this year.
Like Star Trek was first aired in 1966. 55 years ago. We don't subtract
the years between 1973 and 1987. Or between 1969 and 1973. Or between
2005 and 2017. That would be silly.
What one can do is count the years seasons were broadcast. But that's a
different number from the number of the actual age, which is counted
from the year it was first broadcast, aka the birth year.
The True Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 4:49:19 PM11/23/21
to
On 23/11/2021 20:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2395 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:59:13 AM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
>> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>
>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>> is erased from canon.
>
> If the Chibnall Era is erased after Chibnall leaves in 2022, how will the age of Doctor Who be calculated? Would it be 60 or 55 or 54 in 2023?
>
It continues the same way Dallas did, with the Chibnall era being a
> 2395 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:59:13 AM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
>> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>
>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>> is erased from canon.
>
> If the Chibnall Era is erased after Chibnall leaves in 2022, how will the age of Doctor Who be calculated? Would it be 60 or 55 or 54 in 2023?
>
terrible dream.
> Classic Who ended in 1989 at the age of 26. Doctor Who resumed in 2005. Should we be subtracting 16 years from the DW age to get 42, or subtract 16 from Aggy's age to get 38?
>
If the Timeless Child monster is erased from canon New New Who can begin
in 2023.
Falscher Bruce
Nov 23, 2021, 4:55:50 PM11/23/21
to
On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 1:59:13 AM UTC+8, The True Doctor wrote:
> >
> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> is erased from canon.
>
Q Anon says JFK will return from the dead to reinstate the real Doctor.
> >
> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> is erased from canon.
>
Blueshirt
Nov 23, 2021, 5:18:20 PM11/23/21
to
On 23/11/2021 17:59, The True Doctor wrote:
> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>
>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>
> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> is erased from canon.
<rolls eyes>
> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>
>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>
> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> is erased from canon.
Keep taking the medication !
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:33:13 PM11/23/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:41:20 PM11/23/21
to
In article <snj74a$48h$1...@dont-email.me>,
>--
>There are some corners of the universe which have bred the most terrible
>things. Things which act against everything we believe in.
>
>They must be /fought/.
The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>On 23/11/2021 15:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 2375 2376 2377 2378 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 7:32:03 AM UTC-8,
>netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>>
>>> Not with Chibnall in charge.
>>
>> And a math error to boot! 2021 - 1963 = 58.
>>
>Well spotted. There's no "edit" button on UseNet, alas.
LOL!
>On 23/11/2021 15:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 2375 2376 2377 2378 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 7:32:03 AM UTC-8,
>netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>>
>>> Not with Chibnall in charge.
>>
>> And a math error to boot! 2021 - 1963 = 58.
>>
>Well spotted. There's no "edit" button on UseNet, alas.
>--
>There are some corners of the universe which have bred the most terrible
>things. Things which act against everything we believe in.
>
>They must be /fought/.
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:43:33 PM11/23/21
to
In article <TbOdnQ3rXINytgD8...@brightview.co.uk>,
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>
>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>
>
>Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>is erased from canon.
>
Hear!! Hear!!
>On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>
>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>
>
>Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>is erased from canon.
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:44:30 PM11/23/21
to
In article <TbOdnQzrXIORsQD8...@brightview.co.uk>,
Chibnall is the big problem. Jodie is the scapegoat!
>>> --
>>> There are some corners of the universe
>>> which have bred the most terrible things.
>>> Things which act against everything we believe in.
>>>
>>> They must be /fought/.
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 23/11/2021 15:32, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>
>>
>> Not with Chibnall in charge.
>>
>
>Correct.
>
>The Adventures of the Timeless Child is not Doctor Who.
>
#savedoctorwho #retconthetimelesschild .
>> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>
>>
>> Not with Chibnall in charge.
>>
>
>Correct.
>
>The Adventures of the Timeless Child is not Doctor Who.
>
Chibnall is the big problem. Jodie is the scapegoat!
>>> --
>>> There are some corners of the universe
>>> which have bred the most terrible things.
>>> Things which act against everything we believe in.
>>>
>>> They must be /fought/.
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:45:00 PM11/23/21
to
In article <TbOdnQ_rXIMBsQD8...@brightview.co.uk>,
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 23/11/2021 15:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 2375 2376 2377 2378 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 7:32:03 AM UTC-8,
>netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>>
>>> Not with Chibnall in charge.
>>
>> And a math error to boot! 2021 - 1963 = 58.
>>
>
>Like I demonstrated in an earlier thread, the wokies don't understand
>mathematics. Their rabid bigotry prevents them from holding an open
>mind, and that's what you always need to understand maths and science.
>
Like Wilson, McKeown and that ilk.
>> 2375 2376 2377 2378 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 7:32:03 AM UTC-8,
>netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>>
>>> Not with Chibnall in charge.
>>
>> And a math error to boot! 2021 - 1963 = 58.
>>
>
>Like I demonstrated in an earlier thread, the wokies don't understand
>mathematics. Their rabid bigotry prevents them from holding an open
>mind, and that's what you always need to understand maths and science.
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:48:03 PM11/23/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:50:55 PM11/23/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:51:20 PM11/23/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:52:12 PM11/23/21
to
In article <jf2dnYg8APlE_AD8...@brightview.co.uk>,
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 23/11/2021 20:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 2395 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:59:13 AM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>>
>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>>> is erased from canon.
>>
>> If the Chibnall Era is erased after Chibnall leaves in 2022, how will
>the age of Doctor Who be calculated? Would it be 60 or 55 or 54 in
>2023?
>>
>
>It continues the same way Dallas did, with the Chibnall era being a
>terrible dream.
>
>> Classic Who ended in 1989 at the age of 26. Doctor Who resumed in
>2005. Should we be subtracting 16 years from the DW age to get 42, or
>subtract 16 from Aggy's age to get 38?
>>
>
>New Who ended in 2017.
>
>If the Timeless Child monster is erased from canon New New Who can begin
>in 2023.
>
And the real 13th Doctor can appear.
>> 2395 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:59:13 AM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>>
>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>>> is erased from canon.
>>
>> If the Chibnall Era is erased after Chibnall leaves in 2022, how will
>the age of Doctor Who be calculated? Would it be 60 or 55 or 54 in
>2023?
>>
>
>It continues the same way Dallas did, with the Chibnall era being a
>terrible dream.
>
>> Classic Who ended in 1989 at the age of 26. Doctor Who resumed in
>2005. Should we be subtracting 16 years from the DW age to get 42, or
>subtract 16 from Aggy's age to get 38?
>>
>
>New Who ended in 2017.
>
>If the Timeless Child monster is erased from canon New New Who can begin
>in 2023.
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:52:25 PM11/23/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 6:52:48 PM11/23/21
to
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 23, 2021, 8:37:12 PM11/23/21
to
2398 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 1:49:19 PM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
> On 23/11/2021 20:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 2395 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:59:13 AM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >>>
> >> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> >> is erased from canon.
> >
> > If the Chibnall Era is erased after Chibnall leaves in 2022, how will the age of Doctor Who be calculated? Would it be 60 or 55 or 54 in 2023?
> >
> It continues the same way Dallas did, with the Chibnall era being a
> terrible dream.
> > Classic Who ended in 1989 at the age of 26. Doctor Who resumed in 2005. Should we be subtracting 16 years from the DW age to get 42, or subtract 16 from Aggy's age to get 38?
> >
> New Who ended in 2017.
>
> If the Timeless Child monster is erased from canon New New Who can begin
> in 2023.
If the above takes place, will Doctor Who be 60 on November 23, 2023?
> On 23/11/2021 20:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 2395 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:59:13 AM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >>>
> >> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> >> is erased from canon.
> >
> > If the Chibnall Era is erased after Chibnall leaves in 2022, how will the age of Doctor Who be calculated? Would it be 60 or 55 or 54 in 2023?
> >
> It continues the same way Dallas did, with the Chibnall era being a
> terrible dream.
> > Classic Who ended in 1989 at the age of 26. Doctor Who resumed in 2005. Should we be subtracting 16 years from the DW age to get 42, or subtract 16 from Aggy's age to get 38?
> >
> New Who ended in 2017.
>
> If the Timeless Child monster is erased from canon New New Who can begin
> in 2023.
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 23, 2021, 8:40:41 PM11/23/21
to
2399 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 3:50:55 PM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <980a18cd-d09a-4dec...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >2394 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:07:24 AM UTC-8, The Last Doctor wrote:
> >> On 23/11/2021 15:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > 2375 2376 2377 2378 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 7:32:03 AM
> >UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
> >> >> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >> >>>
> >> >> Not with Chibnall in charge.
> >> >
> >> > And a math error to boot! 2021 - 1963 = 58.
> >> >
> >> Well spotted. There's no "edit" button on UseNet, alas.
> >
> >Do you have a delete post button?
> Try yours first.
I have, but you always find my deleted posts anyway!
> In article <980a18cd-d09a-4dec...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >2394 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:07:24 AM UTC-8, The Last Doctor wrote:
> >> On 23/11/2021 15:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > 2375 2376 2377 2378 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 7:32:03 AM
> >UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> In article <sniu0l$uk6$1...@dont-email.me>,
> >> >> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >> >>>
> >> >> Not with Chibnall in charge.
> >> >
> >> > And a math error to boot! 2021 - 1963 = 58.
> >> >
> >> Well spotted. There's no "edit" button on UseNet, alas.
> >
> >Do you have a delete post button?
> Try yours first.
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 23, 2021, 8:41:55 PM11/23/21
to
2400 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 3:52:25 PM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <c638921c-f561-4132...@googlegroups.com>,
> Falscher Bruce <bru...@topmail.co.nz> wrote:
> >On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 1:59:13 AM UTC+8, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> >
> >> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> >> is erased from canon.
> >>
> >Q Anon says JFK will return from the dead to reinstate the real Doctor.
> LOL!
But he died the day before Doctor Who began!
> In article <c638921c-f561-4132...@googlegroups.com>,
> Falscher Bruce <bru...@topmail.co.nz> wrote:
> >On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 1:59:13 AM UTC+8, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> >
> >> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> >> is erased from canon.
> >>
> >Q Anon says JFK will return from the dead to reinstate the real Doctor.
> LOL!
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 23, 2021, 8:44:54 PM11/23/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 11:47:09 PM11/23/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 11:47:35 PM11/23/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 11:47:55 PM11/23/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 23, 2021, 11:48:27 PM11/23/21
to
Daniel65
Nov 24, 2021, 1:53:11 AM11/24/21
to
tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 24/11/21 7:45 am:
Many UseNet Servers do not honour 'Delete' requests, Tim. You should be
aware of that, Tim, as you've been told several times when you have
tried to Cancel/Delete some of your past posts, Tim.
--
Daniel
aware of that, Tim, as you've been told several times when you have
tried to Cancel/Delete some of your past posts, Tim.
--
Daniel
tsbru...@gmail.com
Nov 24, 2021, 4:15:46 AM11/24/21
to
2434 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 8:47:09 PM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <e8282359-cba5-4f39...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >2398 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 1:49:19 PM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> On 23/11/2021 20:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > 2395 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:59:13 AM UTC-8, The True
> >Doctor wrote:
> >> >> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >> >>>
> >> >> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> >> >> is erased from canon.
> >> >
> >> > If the Chibnall Era is erased after Chibnall leaves in 2022, how
> >will the age of Doctor Who be calculated? Would it be 60 or 55 or 54 in
> >2023?
> >> >
> >> It continues the same way Dallas did, with the Chibnall era being a
> >> terrible dream.
> >> > Classic Who ended in 1989 at the age of 26. Doctor Who resumed in
> >2005. Should we be subtracting 16 years from the DW age to get 42, or
> >subtract 16 from Aggy's age to get 38?
> >> >
> >> New Who ended in 2017.
> >>
> >> If the Timeless Child monster is erased from canon New New Who can begin
> >> in 2023.
> >
> >If the above takes place, will Doctor Who be 60 on November 23, 2023?
> WEll there are those gaps.
Caused by Silents?
> In article <e8282359-cba5-4f39...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >2398 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 1:49:19 PM UTC-8, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> On 23/11/2021 20:50, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > 2395 On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 9:59:13 AM UTC-8, The True
> >Doctor wrote:
> >> >> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
> >> >>>
> >> >> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
> >> >> is erased from canon.
> >> >
> >> > If the Chibnall Era is erased after Chibnall leaves in 2022, how
> >will the age of Doctor Who be calculated? Would it be 60 or 55 or 54 in
> >2023?
> >> >
> >> It continues the same way Dallas did, with the Chibnall era being a
> >> terrible dream.
> >> > Classic Who ended in 1989 at the age of 26. Doctor Who resumed in
> >2005. Should we be subtracting 16 years from the DW age to get 42, or
> >subtract 16 from Aggy's age to get 38?
> >> >
> >> New Who ended in 2017.
> >>
> >> If the Timeless Child monster is erased from canon New New Who can begin
> >> in 2023.
> >
> >If the above takes place, will Doctor Who be 60 on November 23, 2023?
> WEll there are those gaps.
The Doctor
Nov 24, 2021, 9:20:44 AM11/24/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 24, 2021, 9:20:57 AM11/24/21
to
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 24, 2021, 9:14:57 PM11/24/21
to
%
Nov 24, 2021, 9:16:07 PM11/24/21
to
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 25, 2021, 3:10:09 AM11/25/21
to
Daniel65
Nov 25, 2021, 4:15:59 AM11/25/21
to
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/2021 10:52 am:
> In article <snjpba$blr$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> On 23/11/2021 17:59, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>
>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>>> is erased from canon.
>>
>> <rolls eyes>
>>
>> Keep taking the medication !
>
> Shut up punt drunk!
>
"punt drunk"?? Is that when you take a row-boat-ish craft out on a river
> In article <snjpba$blr$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> On 23/11/2021 17:59, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>>
>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>>> is erased from canon.
>>
>> <rolls eyes>
>>
>> Keep taking the medication !
>
> Shut up punt drunk!
>
and, whilst out there, have at least a couple of alcoholic drinks too many??
And somewhat abusive of you, Clown!
--
Daniel
Daniel65
Nov 25, 2021, 4:18:04 AM11/25/21
to
The Doctor wrote on 24/11/2021 10:43 am:
> In article <TbOdnQ3rXINytgD8...@brightview.co.uk>,
> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>
>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>> is erased from canon.
>
> Hear!! Hear!!
Hear what, Clown?? That the record's stuck, perhaps!!
> In article <TbOdnQ3rXINytgD8...@brightview.co.uk>,
> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 23/11/2021 14:31, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>> 59 today! And looking pretty sprightly for its age.
>>
>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the Chibnall era
>> is erased from canon.
>
> Hear!! Hear!!
--
Daniel
Blueshirt
Nov 25, 2021, 6:42:04 AM11/25/21
to
Daniel65 wrote:
> The Doctor wrote on 24/11/2021 10:52 am:
> >Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > > On 23/11/2021 17:59, The True Doctor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the
> > > > Chibnall era is erased from canon.
> > >
> The Doctor wrote on 24/11/2021 10:52 am:
> >Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > > On 23/11/2021 17:59, The True Doctor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the
> > > > Chibnall era is erased from canon.
> > >
> > > Keep taking the medication !
> >
> > Shut up punt drunk!
>
> "punt drunk"?? Is that when you take a row-boat-ish craft out on a
> river and, whilst out there, have at least a couple of alcoholic
> drinks too many??
It's been known to happen! ;-)
> >
> > Shut up punt drunk!
>
> "punt drunk"?? Is that when you take a row-boat-ish craft out on a
> river and, whilst out there, have at least a couple of alcoholic
> drinks too many??
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 25, 2021, 8:49:29 AM11/25/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 10:31:55 AM11/25/21
to
In article <3b071971-17bf-452c...@googlegroups.com>,
Why are you marking your arm in Is and IIII/s Tim?
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 10:32:09 AM11/25/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 10:43:49 AM11/25/21
to
In article <1ff3f7c3-ba67-49ba...@googlegroups.com>,
Why are you marking your arm in Is and IIII/s Tim?
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 10:54:47 AM11/25/21
to
In article <snnk8c$s8v$1...@dont-email.me>,
Dan's definition of clown comes from
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
JO: Look.
(The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
him.)
DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
Dannyboy just wants his post count to increase.
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
JO: Look.
(The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
him.)
DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
Dannyboy just wants his post count to increase.
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 10:55:10 AM11/25/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 10:58:29 AM11/25/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 11:01:09 AM11/25/21
to
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 25, 2021, 12:41:39 PM11/25/21
to
2538 On Thursday, November 25, 2021 at 8:01:09 AM UTC-8, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <3e572284-6b2b-4d8c...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >2524 On Thursday, November 25, 2021 at 3:42:04 AM UTC-8, Blueshirt wrote:
> >> Daniel65 wrote:
> >> > The Doctor wrote on 24/11/2021 10:52 am:
> >> > >Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> > > > On 23/11/2021 17:59, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the
> >> > > > > Chibnall era is erased from canon.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Keep taking the medication !
> >> > >
> >> > > Shut up punt drunk!
> >> >
> >> > "punt drunk"?? Is that when you take a row-boat-ish craft out on a
> >> > river and, whilst out there, have at least a couple of alcoholic
> >> > drinks too many??
> >> It's been known to happen! ;-)
> >
> >Or an American Football player who kicks the ball back to the other team
> >on 4th Down gets drunk?
> Eliminate the 4th down!
Then the punt would be on 3rd Down!
> In article <3e572284-6b2b-4d8c...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >2524 On Thursday, November 25, 2021 at 3:42:04 AM UTC-8, Blueshirt wrote:
> >> Daniel65 wrote:
> >> > The Doctor wrote on 24/11/2021 10:52 am:
> >> > >Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> > > > On 23/11/2021 17:59, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Doctor Who ended in 2017. It will always be 54 unless the
> >> > > > > Chibnall era is erased from canon.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Keep taking the medication !
> >> > >
> >> > > Shut up punt drunk!
> >> >
> >> > "punt drunk"?? Is that when you take a row-boat-ish craft out on a
> >> > river and, whilst out there, have at least a couple of alcoholic
> >> > drinks too many??
> >> It's been known to happen! ;-)
> >
> >Or an American Football player who kicks the ball back to the other team
> >on 4th Down gets drunk?
> Eliminate the 4th down!
Blueshirt
Nov 25, 2021, 2:59:18 PM11/25/21
to
down's in football. Speak English!
Have you had too much wine with you Turkey?
Blueshirt
Nov 25, 2021, 3:03:12 PM11/25/21
to
On 25/11/2021 15:58, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <xn0n5srw...@nntp.aioe.org>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 24/11/2021 10:52 am:
>>>> Shut up punt drunk!
>>>
>>> "punt drunk"?? Is that when you take a row-boat-ish craft out on a
>>> river and, whilst out there, have at least a couple of alcoholic
>>> drinks too many??
>>
>> It's been known to happen! ;-)
>
> In IReland when they had the punt.
We still have punts... how do you think we go down our lovely canals and
> In article <xn0n5srw...@nntp.aioe.org>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 24/11/2021 10:52 am:
>>>> Shut up punt drunk!
>>>
>>> "punt drunk"?? Is that when you take a row-boat-ish craft out on a
>>> river and, whilst out there, have at least a couple of alcoholic
>>> drinks too many??
>>
>> It's been known to happen! ;-)
>
> In IReland when they had the punt.
waterways on a hot summers day?
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 25, 2021, 3:21:56 PM11/25/21
to
Blueshirt
Nov 25, 2021, 5:51:38 PM11/25/21
to
On 25/11/2021 20:21, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2551 2552 2553 2554 On Thursday, November 25, 2021 at 11:59:18 AM UTC-8, Blueshirt wrote:
>> On 25/11/2021 13:49, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Or an American Football player who kicks the ball back to the other team on 4th Down gets drunk?
>> I don't even understand that foreign terminology... there are no 4th
>> down's in football. Speak English!
>
> 2551 2552 2553 2554 On Thursday, November 25, 2021 at 11:59:18 AM UTC-8, Blueshirt wrote:
>> On 25/11/2021 13:49, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Or an American Football player who kicks the ball back to the other team on 4th Down gets drunk?
>> I don't even understand that foreign terminology... there are no 4th
>> down's in football. Speak English!
>
> https://www.ducksters.com/sports/football/football_down.php You can read all about 4th downs here. In American Football (as opposed to soccer), the offensive team has 4 tries to gain 10 years. These are called "downs". If the team fails to gain the 10 years after 3 downs, then its 4th down. If the team runs a regular play on 4th down, and fails, the other team gets the ball at the point of scrimmage. The team therefore usually either punts, or attempts a field goal.
I'm not interest in backward sports. American Football is Bogus! Nobody
kicks the ball. So stuff your 4th downs up your Turkey's arse!
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 6:52:12 PM11/25/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 6:58:20 PM11/25/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 6:58:59 PM11/25/21
to
In article <snoq5u$i67$3...@dont-email.me>,
Not those punts, the punts that got replaced by the Euro!
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 6:59:11 PM11/25/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 25, 2021, 7:08:49 PM11/25/21
to
Daniel65
Nov 26, 2021, 1:51:47 AM11/26/21
to
Blueshirt wrote on 26/11/21 9:51 am:
So does that make you a follower of the Rugby verities of football,
either Union or League ..... both of which do involve kicking the
Football .... at least occasionally!!
--
Daniel
either Union or League ..... both of which do involve kicking the
Football .... at least occasionally!!
--
Daniel
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 26, 2021, 2:28:22 AM11/26/21
to
Daniel65
Nov 26, 2021, 5:32:32 AM11/26/21
to
tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 26/11/21 6:28 pm:
Yes, Tim, no-one is disputing that .... but, seems as the ball is
probably thrown more often than it's kicked, why isn't NFL called
'Handball' or some such, Tim??
--
Daniel
probably thrown more often than it's kicked, why isn't NFL called
'Handball' or some such, Tim??
--
Daniel
Blueshirt
Nov 26, 2021, 6:14:05 AM11/26/21
to
Football! Although in Rugby they do kick the ball more than the
bastardised American version but it's still not proper footie.
Tell 'em Dave...
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2021, 9:57:23 AM11/26/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2021, 9:59:49 AM11/26/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2021, 10:04:14 AM11/26/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2021, 10:05:36 AM11/26/21
to
Wouter Valentijn
Nov 26, 2021, 3:37:37 PM11/26/21
to
Op 26-11-2021 om 11:32 schreef Daniel65:
I think I would rename it 'Carry Ball'. ;-)
--
Wouter Valentijn
Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
http://www.nksf.nl/
liam=mail
--
Wouter Valentijn
Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
http://www.nksf.nl/
liam=mail
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 26, 2021, 3:39:21 PM11/26/21
to
Wouter Valentijn
Nov 26, 2021, 4:24:22 PM11/26/21
to
Blueshirt
Nov 26, 2021, 5:03:32 PM11/26/21
to
On 26/11/2021 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <snqfhq$k8c$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> On 26/11/2021 06:51, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> So does that make you a follower of the Rugby verities of football,
>>> either Union or League ..... both of which do involve kicking the
>>> Football .... at least occasionally!!
>>
>> Rugby?!! Cough...splutter... Nay, nay, and thrice nay! FOOTBALL is
>> Football! Although in Rugby they do kick the ball more than the
>> bastardised American version but it's still not proper footie.
>>
>> Tell 'em Dave...
>
> Excuse us?
There is no us!
> In article <snqfhq$k8c$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> On 26/11/2021 06:51, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> So does that make you a follower of the Rugby verities of football,
>>> either Union or League ..... both of which do involve kicking the
>>> Football .... at least occasionally!!
>>
>> Rugby?!! Cough...splutter... Nay, nay, and thrice nay! FOOTBALL is
>> Football! Although in Rugby they do kick the ball more than the
>> bastardised American version but it's still not proper footie.
>>
>> Tell 'em Dave...
>
> Excuse us?
But a Bogus! would have been nice!
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2021, 9:10:34 PM11/26/21
to
In article <j0cusf...@mid.individual.net>,
LOL!
>--
>Wouter Valentijn
>
>Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
>Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
>
>http://www.nksf.nl/
>
>liam=mail
>--
>Wouter Valentijn
>
>Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
>Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
>
>http://www.nksf.nl/
>
>liam=mail
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2021, 9:11:02 PM11/26/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2021, 9:15:26 PM11/26/21
to
In article <j0d1k3...@mid.individual.net>,
Another term is gridiron.
>--
>Wouter Valentijn
>
>Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
>Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
>
>http://www.nksf.nl/
>
>liam=mail
>--
>Wouter Valentijn
>
>Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
>Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
>
>http://www.nksf.nl/
>
>liam=mail
The Doctor
Nov 26, 2021, 9:16:07 PM11/26/21
to
Wouter Valentijn
Nov 27, 2021, 2:25:22 AM11/27/21
to
Op 27-11-2021 om 03:15 schreef The Doctor:
Had to Google that one. Some sort of umbrella term for those types of
sports.
sports.
Daniel65
Nov 27, 2021, 5:34:31 AM11/27/21
to
The Doctor wrote on 27/11/21 2:04 am:
>>> I have seen kicking in the NFL: Kickoffs to start a half, kickoffs
>>> after a score, field goals, and punts.
>>>
>> Yes, Tim, no-one is disputing that .... but, seems as the ball is
>> probably thrown more often than it's kicked, why isn't NFL called
>> 'Handball' or some such, Tim??
>
--
Daniel
> In article <snqd3u$1ag$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 26/11/21 6:28 pm:
<Snip>
> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 26/11/21 6:28 pm:
>>> I have seen kicking in the NFL: Kickoffs to start a half, kickoffs
>>> after a score, field goals, and punts.
>>>
>> Yes, Tim, no-one is disputing that .... but, seems as the ball is
>> probably thrown more often than it's kicked, why isn't NFL called
>> 'Handball' or some such, Tim??
>
> Handball? Even ben to Rugby?
>
I don't know, Clown .... did 'ben' get to the rugby, Clown??
>
--
Daniel
Daniel65
Nov 27, 2021, 5:40:06 AM11/27/21
to
Wouter Valentijn wrote on 27/11/21 6:25 pm:
>>>>>> Yes, Tim, no-one is disputing that .... but, seems as the
>>>>>> ball is probably thrown more often than it's kicked, why
>>>>>> isn't NFL called 'Handball' or some such, Tim??
>>>>> I think I would rename it 'Carry Ball'. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> As opposed to Carry On?
>>>
>>> As in that they /carry/ the ball!
>>
>> Another term is gridiron.
>
> Had to Google that one. Some sort of umbrella term for those types of
> sports.
>
Hmm! I thought 'Grid Iron' was a slang term specifically for 'U.S.
Football'! I don't know if it was a term used by U.S.A.'ians for their
form of Football or by non-U.S.A.'ians for that form of Football.
--
Daniel
> Op 27-11-2021 om 03:15 schreef The Doctor:
>> In article <j0d1k3...@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>> <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>> Op 26-11-2021 om 21:39 schreef tsbr...@gmail.com:
>>>> 2700 On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 12:37:37 PM UTC-8, Wouter
>>>> Valentijn wrote:
>>>>> Op 26-11-2021 om 11:32 schreef Daniel65:
<Snip>
>> In article <j0d1k3...@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>> <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>> Op 26-11-2021 om 21:39 schreef tsbr...@gmail.com:
>>>> 2700 On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 12:37:37 PM UTC-8, Wouter
>>>> Valentijn wrote:
>>>>> Op 26-11-2021 om 11:32 schreef Daniel65:
>>>>>> Yes, Tim, no-one is disputing that .... but, seems as the
>>>>>> ball is probably thrown more often than it's kicked, why
>>>>>> isn't NFL called 'Handball' or some such, Tim??
>>>>> I think I would rename it 'Carry Ball'. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> As opposed to Carry On?
>>>
>>> As in that they /carry/ the ball!
>>
>> Another term is gridiron.
>
> Had to Google that one. Some sort of umbrella term for those types of
> sports.
>
Football'! I don't know if it was a term used by U.S.A.'ians for their
form of Football or by non-U.S.A.'ians for that form of Football.
--
Daniel
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 27, 2021, 5:47:37 AM11/27/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 27, 2021, 7:32:17 AM11/27/21
to
In article <j0e4qv...@mid.individual.net>,
Not found in New Zealand.
>
>--
>Wouter Valentijn
>
>Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
>Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
>
>http://www.nksf.nl/
>
>liam=mail
>
>--
>Wouter Valentijn
>
>Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
>Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
>
>http://www.nksf.nl/
>
>liam=mail
The Doctor
Nov 27, 2021, 7:40:15 AM11/27/21
to
In article <snt1jl$10s$2...@dont-email.me>,
Dan's definition of clown comes from
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
JO: Look.
(The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
him.)
DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
Dannyboy just wants his post count to increase.
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
JO: Look.
(The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
him.)
DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
Dannyboy just wants his post count to increase.
The Doctor
Nov 27, 2021, 7:41:21 AM11/27/21
to
In article <snt1u4$5lj$1...@dont-email.me>,
There is a bit of a humourous The Chase connection to this.
>--
>Daniel
>--
>Daniel
The Doctor
Nov 27, 2021, 7:41:35 AM11/27/21
to
Blueshirt
Nov 27, 2021, 8:21:33 AM11/27/21
to
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 27, 2021, 9:50:55 AM11/27/21
to
Blueshirt
Nov 27, 2021, 12:05:02 PM11/27/21
to
Football. They'd still watch it if the sport was called Throwball.
The Doctor
Nov 27, 2021, 7:31:06 PM11/27/21
to
In article <sntbcr$1kl$1...@dont-email.me>,
Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>On 27/11/2021 10:47, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 2755 2756 2757 2758 2759 On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 2:03:32 PM
>UTC-8, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> On 26/11/2021 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <snqfhq$k8c$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> On 26/11/2021 06:51, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>> So does that make you a follower of the Rugby verities of football,
>>>>>> either Union or League ..... both of which do involve kicking the
>>>>>> Football .... at least occasionally!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Rugby?!! Cough...splutter... Nay, nay, and thrice nay! FOOTBALL is
>>>>> Football! Although in Rugby they do kick the ball more than the
>>>>> bastardised American version but it's still not proper footie.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell 'em Dave...
>>>>
>>>> Excuse us?
>>> There is no us!
>>>
>>> But a Bogus! would have been nice!
>>
>> Why would football be bogus?
>
>Football where you don't kick the ball is clearly not football...
>
>
IYIO of course.
>On 27/11/2021 10:47, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 2755 2756 2757 2758 2759 On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 2:03:32 PM
>UTC-8, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> On 26/11/2021 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <snqfhq$k8c$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> On 26/11/2021 06:51, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>> So does that make you a follower of the Rugby verities of football,
>>>>>> either Union or League ..... both of which do involve kicking the
>>>>>> Football .... at least occasionally!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Rugby?!! Cough...splutter... Nay, nay, and thrice nay! FOOTBALL is
>>>>> Football! Although in Rugby they do kick the ball more than the
>>>>> bastardised American version but it's still not proper footie.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell 'em Dave...
>>>>
>>>> Excuse us?
>>> There is no us!
>>>
>>> But a Bogus! would have been nice!
>>
>> Why would football be bogus?
>
>Football where you don't kick the ball is clearly not football...
>
>
The Doctor
Nov 27, 2021, 7:33:13 PM11/27/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 27, 2021, 7:39:05 PM11/27/21
to
Daniel65
Nov 28, 2021, 4:27:08 AM11/28/21
to
The Doctor wrote on 27/11/21 11:41 pm:
--
Daniel
> In article <snt1u4$5lj$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> Wouter Valentijn wrote on 27/11/21 6:25 pm:
>>> Op 27-11-2021 om 03:15 schreef The Doctor:
>>>> In article <j0d1k3...@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>>> <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>> Op 26-11-2021 om 21:39 schreef tsbr...@gmail.com:
>>>>>> 2700 On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 12:37:37 PM UTC-8, Wouter
>>>>>> Valentijn wrote:
>>>>>>> Op 26-11-2021 om 11:32 schreef Daniel65:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, Tim, no-one is disputing that .... but, seems as the
>>>>>>>> ball is probably thrown more often than it's kicked, why
>>>>>>>> isn't NFL called 'Handball' or some such, Tim??
>>>>>>> I think I would rename it 'Carry Ball'. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As opposed to Carry On?
>>>>>
>>>>> As in that they /carry/ the ball!
>>>>
>>>> Another term is gridiron.
>>>
>>> Had to Google that one. Some sort of umbrella term for those types of
>>> sports.
>>>
>> Hmm! I thought 'Grid Iron' was a slang term specifically for 'U.S.
>> Football'! I don't know if it was a term used by U.S.A.'ians for their
>> form of Football or by non-U.S.A.'ians for that form of Football.
>
> There is a bit of a humourous The Chase connection to this.
???
> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> Wouter Valentijn wrote on 27/11/21 6:25 pm:
>>> Op 27-11-2021 om 03:15 schreef The Doctor:
>>>> In article <j0d1k3...@mid.individual.net>, Wouter Valentijn
>>>> <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>>> Op 26-11-2021 om 21:39 schreef tsbr...@gmail.com:
>>>>>> 2700 On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 12:37:37 PM UTC-8, Wouter
>>>>>> Valentijn wrote:
>>>>>>> Op 26-11-2021 om 11:32 schreef Daniel65:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, Tim, no-one is disputing that .... but, seems as the
>>>>>>>> ball is probably thrown more often than it's kicked, why
>>>>>>>> isn't NFL called 'Handball' or some such, Tim??
>>>>>>> I think I would rename it 'Carry Ball'. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As opposed to Carry On?
>>>>>
>>>>> As in that they /carry/ the ball!
>>>>
>>>> Another term is gridiron.
>>>
>>> Had to Google that one. Some sort of umbrella term for those types of
>>> sports.
>>>
>> Hmm! I thought 'Grid Iron' was a slang term specifically for 'U.S.
>> Football'! I don't know if it was a term used by U.S.A.'ians for their
>> form of Football or by non-U.S.A.'ians for that form of Football.
>
> There is a bit of a humourous The Chase connection to this.
--
Daniel
Daniel65
Nov 28, 2021, 4:30:09 AM11/28/21
to
tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 28/11/21 1:50 am:
No, Tim, they are just stupid for thinking they are watching a form of
'Football' every Sunday in Autumn, Tim.
--
Daniel
'Football' every Sunday in Autumn, Tim.
--
Daniel
The Doctor
Nov 28, 2021, 8:14:55 AM11/28/21
to
The Doctor
Nov 28, 2021, 8:16:11 AM11/28/21
to
Daniel65
Nov 29, 2021, 3:16:58 AM11/29/21
to
The Doctor wrote on 29/11/21 12:14 am:
> The New York scene.
>
????
--
Daniel
>
????
--
Daniel
tsbru...@gmail.com
Dec 22, 2021, 10:09:53 PM12/22/21
to
The Doctor
Dec 23, 2021, 12:41:37 AM12/23/21
to
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages