info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Everyone BE WARE! The new Rose was born a man.
179 views
Skip to first unread message
The True Doctor
May 16, 2022, 8:52:49 PM5/16/22
to
The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
When Dick Emery and Danny La Roux dressed up as women and tried to
sexually entice men the viewers knew in advance that they were men in
drag. Even children knew this when their shows were shown on the BBC and
thus nobody was harmed. The same applied when Jon Pertwee dressed up in
drag as a cleaning lady in The Green Death, so don't let RTD pretend
that this is the first trans actor in Doctor Who. People who were not
who they were pretended to be were clearly signalled.
RTD has now made Doctor Who woker than ever. This isn't a family science
fiction show made to entertain people any more. It's a vehicle for
lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, trans, and queer activism.
This isn't either diversity or representation, it's exclusion and
repression of the majority.
Doctor Who is DEAD! and even brining David Tennant and Catherine Tate
back for the 60th Anniversary isn't going to revive it.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
When Dick Emery and Danny La Roux dressed up as women and tried to
sexually entice men the viewers knew in advance that they were men in
drag. Even children knew this when their shows were shown on the BBC and
thus nobody was harmed. The same applied when Jon Pertwee dressed up in
drag as a cleaning lady in The Green Death, so don't let RTD pretend
that this is the first trans actor in Doctor Who. People who were not
who they were pretended to be were clearly signalled.
RTD has now made Doctor Who woker than ever. This isn't a family science
fiction show made to entertain people any more. It's a vehicle for
lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, trans, and queer activism.
This isn't either diversity or representation, it's exclusion and
repression of the majority.
Doctor Who is DEAD! and even brining David Tennant and Catherine Tate
back for the 60th Anniversary isn't going to revive it.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 16, 2022, 9:13:44 PM5/16/22
to
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
It could be a different character who happens to have the first name of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a trans!
> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
The True Doctor
May 16, 2022, 10:01:20 PM5/16/22
to
On 17/05/2022 02:13, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>
>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>
>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> It could be a different character who happens to have the first name of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
>>
If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly remember
> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>
>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>
>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> It could be a different character who happens to have the first name of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
>>
Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours before having her
memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor erased, besides him
being born male and how many boys called Rose do you know? Also since
Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the character should only be 13 years
old in 2023, and they're not.
>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>
> What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a trans!
where the deception lies.
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 16, 2022, 11:44:38 PM5/16/22
to
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble! This means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making her a completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major clue to the fact that the new Rose is a different character is the fact that the new Rose has much darker skin than the old Rose!
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/heartstoppers-yasmin-finney-joins-60th-cast-as-rose-temple-noble-97288.htm?fbclid=IwAR28pPkWbEnt2wNvUGsaj8O5i3ZzEqIcAqbQjj48G1pIj93Q30lfiU14XWE
If the first Rose came back, I would expect her to be named "Rose Tyler Doctor"!
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 16, 2022, 11:48:58 PM5/16/22
to
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 7:01:20 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> On 17/05/2022 02:13, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> > It could be a different character who happens to have the first name of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
> >>
> If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly remember
> Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours before having her
> memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor erased, besides him
> being born male and how many boys called Rose do you know? Also since
> Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the character should only be 13 years
> old in 2023, and they're not.
In which Doctor Who episode is it stated that Donna Noble's kid is a son? (I don't recall hearing that info in any DW episode).
> On 17/05/2022 02:13, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> > It could be a different character who happens to have the first name of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
> >>
> If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly remember
> Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours before having her
> memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor erased, besides him
> being born male and how many boys called Rose do you know? Also since
> Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the character should only be 13 years
> old in 2023, and they're not.
> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> >
> > What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a trans!
> The Mirror might have but RTD didn't, nor did the actor, and that's
> where the deception lies.
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 16, 2022, 11:53:51 PM5/16/22
to
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
What would you have done if Yasmin's trans stratus had been revealed right away by Yasmin and RTD?
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 16, 2022, 11:59:42 PM5/16/22
to
Matthew Smith · 8h ·
Yasmin Finney is playing Rose Temple-Noble. Is she Donna's daughter? Is she a Parallel Rose? What we do know is she's played by a transgender actress. And not a moment too soon
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 1:54:20 AM5/17/22
to
In article <opidnYvBWftGbB__...@brightview.co.uk>,
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Ontario, stop the madness and on 2 June vote Liberal! Beware https://mindspring.com
The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
>https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
>Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
>This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>
>When Dick Emery and Danny La Roux dressed up as women and tried to
>sexually entice men the viewers knew in advance that they were men in
>drag. Even children knew this when their shows were shown on the BBC and
>thus nobody was harmed. The same applied when Jon Pertwee dressed up in
>drag as a cleaning lady in The Green Death, so don't let RTD pretend
>that this is the first trans actor in Doctor Who. People who were not
>who they were pretended to be were clearly signalled.
>
>RTD has now made Doctor Who woker than ever. This isn't a family science
>fiction show made to entertain people any more. It's a vehicle for
>lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, trans, and queer activism.
>
>This isn't either diversity or representation, it's exclusion and
>repression of the majority.
>
>Doctor Who is DEAD! and even brining David Tennant and Catherine Tate
>back for the 60th Anniversary isn't going to revive it.
>
Trans nutter!
>The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
>https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
>Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
>This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>
>When Dick Emery and Danny La Roux dressed up as women and tried to
>sexually entice men the viewers knew in advance that they were men in
>drag. Even children knew this when their shows were shown on the BBC and
>thus nobody was harmed. The same applied when Jon Pertwee dressed up in
>drag as a cleaning lady in The Green Death, so don't let RTD pretend
>that this is the first trans actor in Doctor Who. People who were not
>who they were pretended to be were clearly signalled.
>
>RTD has now made Doctor Who woker than ever. This isn't a family science
>fiction show made to entertain people any more. It's a vehicle for
>lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, trans, and queer activism.
>
>This isn't either diversity or representation, it's exclusion and
>repression of the majority.
>
>Doctor Who is DEAD! and even brining David Tennant and Catherine Tate
>back for the 60th Anniversary isn't going to revive it.
>
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Ontario, stop the madness and on 2 June vote Liberal! Beware https://mindspring.com
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 1:54:41 AM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 1:57:38 AM5/17/22
to
In article <Wu6dnQ011-l3nB7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 17/05/2022 02:13, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>
>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>
>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> It could be a different character who happens to have the first name
>of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
>>>
>
>If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly remember
>Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours before having her
>memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor erased, besides him
>being born male and how many boys called Rose do you know? Also since
>Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the character should only be 13 years
>old in 2023, and they're not.
>
>>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>>
>> What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a trans!
>
>The Mirror might have but RTD didn't, nor did the actor, and that's
>where the deception lies.
>
And those are the facts.
>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>
>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>
>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> It could be a different character who happens to have the first name
>of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
>>>
>
>If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly remember
>Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours before having her
>memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor erased, besides him
>being born male and how many boys called Rose do you know? Also since
>Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the character should only be 13 years
>old in 2023, and they're not.
>
>>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>>
>> What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a trans!
>
>The Mirror might have but RTD didn't, nor did the actor, and that's
>where the deception lies.
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 2:01:14 AM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 2:01:29 AM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 2:01:45 AM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 2:02:12 AM5/17/22
to
Blueshirt
May 17, 2022, 2:31:59 AM5/17/22
to
The True Doctor wrote:
>
> Doctor Who is DEAD! and even bringing David Tennant and Catherine
Great stuff. Another one added on to the ratings!
>
> Doctor Who is DEAD! and even bringing David Tennant and Catherine
> Tate back for the 60th Anniversary isn't going to revive it.
You're still going to sit down and watch it though aren't you?
Great stuff. Another one added on to the ratings!
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 17, 2022, 2:45:23 AM5/17/22
to
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 10:54:41 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <4015cadd-0f74-409e...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> >It could be a different character who happens to have the first name of
> >Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
> >>
> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> >
> >What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a trans!
> Therefore ...
The trans secret was out, so no deception possible!
> In article <4015cadd-0f74-409e...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> >It could be a different character who happens to have the first name of
> >Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
> >>
> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> >
> >What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a trans!
> Therefore ...
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 17, 2022, 2:46:31 AM5/17/22
to
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 10:57:38 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <Wu6dnQ011-l3nB7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
> >On 17/05/2022 02:13, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>>
> >>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >>
> >> It could be a different character who happens to have the first name
> >of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
> >>>
> >
> >If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly remember
> >Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours before having her
> >memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor erased, besides him
> >being born male and how many boys called Rose do you know? Also since
> >Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the character should only be 13 years
> >old in 2023, and they're not.
> >
> >>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> >>
> >> What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a trans!
> >
> >The Mirror might have but RTD didn't, nor did the actor, and that's
> >where the deception lies.
> >
> And those are the facts.
Is there a law requiring that showrunners disclose their transgender actors?
> In article <Wu6dnQ011-l3nB7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
> >On 17/05/2022 02:13, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>>
> >>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >>
> >> It could be a different character who happens to have the first name
> >of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
> >>>
> >
> >If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly remember
> >Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours before having her
> >memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor erased, besides him
> >being born male and how many boys called Rose do you know? Also since
> >Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the character should only be 13 years
> >old in 2023, and they're not.
> >
> >>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> >>
> >> What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a trans!
> >
> >The Mirror might have but RTD didn't, nor did the actor, and that's
> >where the deception lies.
> >
> And those are the facts.
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 17, 2022, 2:48:14 AM5/17/22
to
The True Doctor
May 17, 2022, 5:21:33 AM5/17/22
to
On 17/05/2022 04:44, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>
>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>
>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble! This means that she
Why would Donna call he child Rose when 1) She had all her memories
> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>
>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>
>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble! This means that she
erased of being with the Doctor, 2) She never knew Rose Tyler for more
than a few hours, and 3) the child was born a boy so she would have
given him a boy's name?
Also the normal convention is to put the husband's surname last if
you're going to use the wife's family name, as with Brooklyn
Peltz-Beckham and Nicola Peltz-Beckham
>is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making her a completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major clue to the fact that the new Rose is a different character is the fact that the new Rose has much darker skin than the old Rose!
>
returning Russell T Davies DESTROYS EVERYTHING by inserting his rabid
bigoted woke agenda into the same!
The actor doesn't even have any breasts, and like people are not going
to notice? He doesn't have any feminine hips either. The whole story is
going to be about Donna giving birth to a boy with the mental illness of
gender dysphoria.
> https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/heartstoppers-yasmin-finney-joins-60th-cast-as-rose-temple-noble-97288.htm?fbclid=IwAR28pPkWbEnt2wNvUGsaj8O5i3ZzEqIcAqbQjj48G1pIj93Q30lfiU14XWE
>
> If the first Rose came back, I would expect her to be named "Rose Tyler Doctor"!
destroyed like Tegan and Ace.
Daniel65
May 17, 2022, 8:03:33 AM5/17/22
to
The True Doctor wrote on 17/5/22 12:01 pm:
Hasn't Rose been spending all her time with The Human Doctor?? Will The
Human Doctor make a come-back as well?? So not really 'The 10th Doctor'
but the 'copy'!!
--
Daniel
> On 17/05/2022 02:13, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>
>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>
>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> It could be a different character who happens to have the first name
>> of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
>
> If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly remember
> Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours before having her
> memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor erased, besides him
> being born male and how many boys called Rose do you know? Also since
> Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the character should only be 13 years
> old in 2023, and they're not.
>
>>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>>
>> What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a
>> trans!
>
> The Mirror might have but RTD didn't, nor did the actor, and that's
> where the deception lies.
>
"a character she only met for a few hours before having her memory of
all the time she spent with the Doctor erased,"
I wonder how 'they' will handle this in the 60th Anniversary show!
>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>
>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>
>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> It could be a different character who happens to have the first name
>> of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
>
> If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly remember
> Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours before having her
> memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor erased, besides him
> being born male and how many boys called Rose do you know? Also since
> Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the character should only be 13 years
> old in 2023, and they're not.
>
>>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>>
>> What deception? The article clearly told you that the actress is a
>> trans!
>
> The Mirror might have but RTD didn't, nor did the actor, and that's
> where the deception lies.
>
"a character she only met for a few hours before having her memory of
all the time she spent with the Doctor erased,"
Hasn't Rose been spending all her time with The Human Doctor?? Will The
Human Doctor make a come-back as well?? So not really 'The 10th Doctor'
but the 'copy'!!
--
Daniel
Daniel65
May 17, 2022, 8:08:35 AM5/17/22
to
tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 17/5/22 1:48 pm:
.... and she was quickly on the 'phone with her Friends who were
commenting about all the planets in the sky!!
--
Daniel
> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 7:01:20 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> On 17/05/2022 02:13, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor
>>> wrote:
>>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>>
>>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>>
>>> It could be a different character who happens to have the first
>>> name of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
>>>>
>> If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly
>> remember Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours
>> before having her memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor
>> erased, besides him being born male and how many boys called Rose
>> do you know? Also since Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the
>> character should only be 13 years old in 2023, and they're not.
>
> In which Doctor Who episode is it stated that Donna Noble's kid is a
> son? (I don't recall hearing that info in any DW episode).
Last I can recall, The Doctor dropped Donna off at her Mother's place
>> On 17/05/2022 02:13, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor
>>> wrote:
>>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>>
>>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>>
>>> It could be a different character who happens to have the first
>>> name of Rose! Sort of like the two Jennies in Doctor Who.
>>>>
>> If it's the son born to Donna Noble then how can she possibly
>> remember Rose Tyler, a character she only met for a few hours
>> before having her memory of all the time she spent with the Doctor
>> erased, besides him being born male and how many boys called Rose
>> do you know? Also since Donna's wedding took place in 2010 the
>> character should only be 13 years old in 2023, and they're not.
>
> In which Doctor Who episode is it stated that Donna Noble's kid is a
> son? (I don't recall hearing that info in any DW episode).
.... and she was quickly on the 'phone with her Friends who were
commenting about all the planets in the sky!!
--
Daniel
The Other Doctor
May 17, 2022, 8:36:28 AM5/17/22
to
"The True Doctor" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
news:opidnYvBWftGbB__...@brightview.co.uk...
> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
Rose Tyler hasn't been replaced at all. The character is called Rose.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
Deception? You don't need to know ANYTHING about Yasmin Finney, apart from
the fact she's the actress who will be playing Rose. It doesn't matter
whether she's trans. It doesn't matter what her sex or sexuality is. The
only thing that matters is whether she suits the part she's been cast in.
You're so infantile and so insecure, you'll never be happy. Have your dreams
about how wonderful your crowdfunded series could have been. Perhaps you can
dream about being a black woman, cos you don't seem happy as a male Greek.
Meanwhile, Doctor Who will continue. It just isn't for you, Aggy. Please
bugger off elsewhere and obsess over something else.
Daniel65
May 17, 2022, 8:45:13 AM5/17/22
to
tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 17/5/22 1:44 pm:
(What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
Daniel
> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>
>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>
>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble! This
> means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making her a
> completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major clue to the
> fact that the new Rose is a different character is the fact that the
> new Rose has much darker skin than the old Rose!
Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark skinned guy??
>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>
>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>
>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble! This
> means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making her a
> completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major clue to the
> fact that the new Rose is a different character is the fact that the
> new Rose has much darker skin than the old Rose!
(What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>
> https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/heartstoppers-yasmin-finney-joins-60th-cast-as-rose-temple-noble-97288.htm?fbclid=IwAR28pPkWbEnt2wNvUGsaj8O5i3ZzEqIcAqbQjj48G1pIj93Q30lfiU14XWE
>
> If the first Rose came back, I would expect her to be named "Rose
> Tyler Doctor"!
--
> https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/heartstoppers-yasmin-finney-joins-60th-cast-as-rose-temple-noble-97288.htm?fbclid=IwAR28pPkWbEnt2wNvUGsaj8O5i3ZzEqIcAqbQjj48G1pIj93Q30lfiU14XWE
>
> If the first Rose came back, I would expect her to be named "Rose
> Tyler Doctor"!
Daniel
The True Doctor
May 17, 2022, 9:09:44 AM5/17/22
to
On 17/05/2022 13:37, The Other Doctor wrote:
> "The True Doctor" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
> news:opidnYvBWftGbB__...@brightview.co.uk...
>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>
>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>
>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>
> Rose Tyler hasn't been replaced at all. The character is called Rose.
>
> Deception? You don't need to know ANYTHING about Yasmin Finney, apart from
> the fact she's the actress who will be playing Rose. It doesn't matter
Yes I do. As J K Rowling would say, casting a man to play a woman is a
> "The True Doctor" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
> news:opidnYvBWftGbB__...@brightview.co.uk...
>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>
>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>
>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>
> Rose Tyler hasn't been replaced at all. The character is called Rose.
>
> Deception? You don't need to know ANYTHING about Yasmin Finney, apart from
> the fact she's the actress who will be playing Rose. It doesn't matter
devaluation of women and women's rights. It's is also deception.
> whether she's trans. It doesn't matter what her sex or sexuality is. The
deception. Why wasn't a biological woman cast in the role? Why are roles
being taken away from biological women?
Even RTD himself said that only homosexuals should play homosexual
roles. The two faced woke agenda peddling hypocrite.
> only thing that matters is whether she suits the part she's been cast in.
doesn't have any breasts or curved hips like a woman normally would, let
alone a womb.
This isn't supposed to be Ru Paul's Drag Race and this actor is not
playing the part of Clisthenese in Aristophanes' play The
Thesmophoriazusae which was written for transgender person.
> You're so infantile and so insecure, you'll never be happy. Have your dreams
totally obsessed with chauvinistic, race, gender, and identity politics.
The majority are sick to death you your degenerate race, gender, and
identity politics hijacking every single franchise and destroying it.
We're not fucking interested in it and we're not going to just sit or
stand there and be lectured.
> about how wonderful your crowdfunded series could have been. Perhaps you can
a step closer. It's just a matter of acquiring the rights when they
become totally worthless.
> dream about being a black woman, cos you don't seem happy as a male Greek.
Greeks, including the world's greatest basketball player Yiannis
Antentokoumpo, so why shouldn't I be happy?
I'm not obsessed with your degenerate race, gender, and identity politics.
> Meanwhile, Doctor Who will continue.
> It just isn't for you, Aggy. Please
and destroy anything that isn't made in their own image.
> bugger off elsewhere and obsess over something else.
Look at how the ratings and fallen to 2.2 million, because the show is
only being made for lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals, transexuals, and queers.
The True Doctor
May 17, 2022, 9:10:47 AM5/17/22
to
The Last Doctor
May 17, 2022, 9:18:33 AM5/17/22
to
Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 17/5/22 1:44 pm:
>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>
>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>
>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble! This
>> means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making her a
>> completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major clue to the
>> fact that the new Rose is a different character is the fact that the
>> new Rose has much darker skin than the old Rose!
>
> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark skinned guy??
>
> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
We don’t do that sort of thing, it’s not necessary. And why American?
> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 17/5/22 1:44 pm:
>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>
>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>
>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble! This
>> means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making her a
>> completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major clue to the
>> fact that the new Rose is a different character is the fact that the
>> new Rose has much darker skin than the old Rose!
>
> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark skinned guy??
>
> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
(Boggle)
People might reference their heritage when defining themselves, but not in
everyday conversation.
Both potential marriages for Donna were to black Britons, the second one
being Shaun Temple. I suspect snobbery after winning the lottery (the
Doctor’s parting gift of a ticket in “The End of Time”) led to the
“Temple-Noble” name.
So Rose is likely to be her daughter and contrary to my earlier
speculation, from this universe. Since Donna married in 2010 but Yasmin
Finney is 18 at time of filming, Rose and Donna are probably meant to be
from 2026-2030ish.
Since Rose is likely, like the actor portraying her, to be trans, her name
will be self selected. I can imagine Donna sitting with her and saying
something like “Rose. Rose is a nice name” without quite knowing why.
--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.
They must be /fought/.
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 9:42:52 AM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 9:43:32 AM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 9:43:44 AM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:07:55 AM5/17/22
to
In article <PMidnY3EDPCK9B7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
I owuld be better for the Timless Child Arc to be totally retconned.
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The Other Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:18:07 AM5/17/22
to
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t60a7o$c4j$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>
> I owuld be better for the Timless Child Arc to be totally retconned.
Gibberish.
> I owuld be better for the Timless Child Arc to be totally retconned.
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:24:45 AM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:25:06 AM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:26:04 AM5/17/22
to
In article <t604sa$ikg$1...@dont-email.me>,
SW, go to a Christian psychologist and get yourself checked out!
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:26:36 AM5/17/22
to
In article <t605cn$sl9$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>
>>
>https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/heartstoppers-yasmin-finney-joins-60th-cast-as-rose-temple-noble-97288.htm?fbclid=IwAR28pPkWbEnt2wNvUGsaj8O5i3ZzEqIcAqbQjj48G1pIj93Q30lfiU14XWE
>>
>> If the first Rose came back, I would expect her to be named "Rose
>> Tyler Doctor"!
>--
>Daniel
Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 17/5/22 1:44 pm:
>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>
>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble! This
>> means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making her a
>> completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major clue to the
>> fact that the new Rose is a different character is the fact that the
>> new Rose has much darker skin than the old Rose!
>
>Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark skinned guy??
>
>(What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
Originally and then Indian.
>tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 17/5/22 1:44 pm:
>> On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>
>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>
>> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble! This
>> means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making her a
>> completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major clue to the
>> fact that the new Rose is a different character is the fact that the
>> new Rose has much darker skin than the old Rose!
>
>Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark skinned guy??
>
>(What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>>
>>
>https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/heartstoppers-yasmin-finney-joins-60th-cast-as-rose-temple-noble-97288.htm?fbclid=IwAR28pPkWbEnt2wNvUGsaj8O5i3ZzEqIcAqbQjj48G1pIj93Q30lfiU14XWE
>>
>> If the first Rose came back, I would expect her to be named "Rose
>> Tyler Doctor"!
>--
>Daniel
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:27:14 AM5/17/22
to
In article <t6ednWSbY8MMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
TOD is really a piece of work.
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:27:34 AM5/17/22
to
In article <t6ednWebY8NMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
Sad but true.
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:27:56 AM5/17/22
to
In article <t607b6$iqc$1...@dont-email.me>,
I just wait.
>--
>There are some corners of the universe
> which have bred the most terrible things.
>Things which act against everything we believe in.
>
>They must be /fought/.
>--
>There are some corners of the universe
> which have bred the most terrible things.
>Things which act against everything we believe in.
>
>They must be /fought/.
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 10:31:24 AM5/17/22
to
In article <t60aqt$dp1$1...@dont-email.me>,
>
>Gibberish.
>
>
Proof that Wilson is anti-DoctorWho and Pro-Timeless-child!
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:t60a7o$c4j$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>
>> It would be better for the Timeless Child Arc to be totally retconned.
>news:t60a7o$c4j$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>
>
>Gibberish.
>
>
Proof that Wilson is anti-DoctorWho and Pro-Timeless-child!
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 17, 2022, 3:35:39 PM5/17/22
to
On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 5:36:28 AM UTC-7, The Other Doctor wrote:
> "The True Doctor" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
> news:opidnYvBWftGbB__...@brightview.co.uk...
> > The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >
> > https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >
> > Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> > This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> Rose Tyler hasn't been replaced at all. The character is called Rose.
>
> Deception? You don't need to know ANYTHING about Yasmin Finney, apart from
> the fact she's the actress who will be playing Rose. It doesn't matter
> whether she's trans. It doesn't matter what her sex or sexuality is. The
> only thing that matters is whether she suits the part she's been cast in.
I gather that Aggy thinks that ONLY biological ladies should play lady characters!
> "The True Doctor" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
> news:opidnYvBWftGbB__...@brightview.co.uk...
> > The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >
> > https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >
> > Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> > This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> Rose Tyler hasn't been replaced at all. The character is called Rose.
>
> Deception? You don't need to know ANYTHING about Yasmin Finney, apart from
> the fact she's the actress who will be playing Rose. It doesn't matter
> whether she's trans. It doesn't matter what her sex or sexuality is. The
> only thing that matters is whether she suits the part she's been cast in.
The True Doctor
May 17, 2022, 5:08:32 PM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 6:25:00 PM5/17/22
to
The Doctor
May 17, 2022, 6:25:20 PM5/17/22
to
In article <y8OdnYmM4dZXkxn_...@brightview.co.uk>,
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 17/05/2022 20:35, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 5:36:28 AM UTC-7, The Other Doctor wrote:
>>> "The True Doctor" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
>>> news:opidnYvBWftGbB__...@brightview.co.uk...
>>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>>
>>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>>>
>>>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>>> Rose Tyler hasn't been replaced at all. The character is called Rose.
>>>
>>> Deception? You don't need to know ANYTHING about Yasmin Finney, apart from
>>> the fact she's the actress who will be playing Rose. It doesn't matter
>>> whether she's trans. It doesn't matter what her sex or sexuality is. The
>>> only thing that matters is whether she suits the part she's been cast in.
>>
>> I gather that Aggy thinks that ONLY biological ladies should play lady
>characters!
>
>This isn't a production at Shakespeare's Globe in the later 1500s.
>
Good point!
>On 17/05/2022 20:35, tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 5:36:28 AM UTC-7, The Other Doctor wrote:
>>> "The True Doctor" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
>>> news:opidnYvBWftGbB__...@brightview.co.uk...
>>>> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>>>>
>>>> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>>>>
>>>> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>>> Rose Tyler hasn't been replaced at all. The character is called Rose.
>>>
>>> Deception? You don't need to know ANYTHING about Yasmin Finney, apart from
>>> the fact she's the actress who will be playing Rose. It doesn't matter
>>> whether she's trans. It doesn't matter what her sex or sexuality is. The
>>> only thing that matters is whether she suits the part she's been cast in.
>>
>> I gather that Aggy thinks that ONLY biological ladies should play lady
>characters!
>
>This isn't a production at Shakespeare's Globe in the later 1500s.
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
Daniel65
May 18, 2022, 3:28:24 AM5/18/22
to
might be a typo as well!!
Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel
Daniel65
May 18, 2022, 3:40:24 AM5/18/22
to
The Last Doctor wrote on 17/05/2022 11:18 pm:
> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
<Snip>
>> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
>> skinned guy??
>>
>> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>
> We don’t do that sort of thing, it’s not necessary. And why
> American? (Boggle)
Afro-American is an acceptable term in U.S. of A., isn't it??
I was searching for a British equivalent.
> People might reference their heritage when defining themselves, but
> not in everyday conversation.
>
> Both potential marriages for Donna were to black Britons,
Guess I was just trying to be 'PC' .... and failing!! ;-P
Is "black Briton" PC?? ;-)
--
Daniel
> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
<Snip>
>> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
>> skinned guy??
>>
>> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>
> We don’t do that sort of thing, it’s not necessary. And why
> American? (Boggle)
I was searching for a British equivalent.
> People might reference their heritage when defining themselves, but
> not in everyday conversation.
>
> Both potential marriages for Donna were to black Britons,
Is "black Briton" PC?? ;-)
--
Daniel
Daniel65
May 18, 2022, 3:42:43 AM5/18/22
to
The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:26 am:
> In article <t605cn$sl9$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
<Snip>
> In article <t605cn$sl9$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble!
>>> This means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making
>>> her a completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major
>>> clue to the fact that the new Rose is a different character is
>>> the fact that the new Rose has much darker skin than the old
>>> Rose!
>>
>> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
>> skinned guy??
>>
>> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>
> Originally and then Indian.
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 18, 2022, 3:48:34 AM5/18/22
to
Daniel65
May 18, 2022, 3:56:56 AM5/18/22
to
The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:27 am:
> In article <t6ednWSbY8MMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
<Snip>
> In article <t6ednWSbY8MMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> Look at how the ratings and fallen to 2.2 million, because the show is
>> only being made for lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals, transexuals, and queers.
>
> TOD is really a piece of work.
The Last Doctor
May 18, 2022, 4:41:02 AM5/18/22
to
Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
> The Last Doctor wrote on 17/05/2022 11:18 pm:
>> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
>>> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
>>> skinned guy??
>>>
>>> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>>
>> We don’t do that sort of thing, it’s not necessary. And why
>> American? (Boggle)
>
> Afro-American is an acceptable term in U.S. of A., isn't it??
>
> I was searching for a British equivalent.
Which wouldn’t involve America. But we don’t do that. In detail we might
> The Last Doctor wrote on 17/05/2022 11:18 pm:
>> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
>>> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
>>> skinned guy??
>>>
>>> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>>
>> We don’t do that sort of thing, it’s not necessary. And why
>> American? (Boggle)
>
> Afro-American is an acceptable term in U.S. of A., isn't it??
>
> I was searching for a British equivalent.
say “black British with Caribbean (or precise islands) roots”, or Nigerian,
Rwandan etc - but it’s something that generally would only be discussed or
worried about in description, biography, or personal statement of identity.
Day to day, they’re British people who happen to be black.
>> People might reference their heritage when defining themselves, but
>> not in everyday conversation.
>>
>> Both potential marriages for Donna were to black Britons,
>
> Guess I was just trying to be 'PC' .... and failing!! ;-P
>
> Is "black Briton" PC?? ;-)
from “Negro” and “Indian” to “coloured”, now to “black” and “Asian” (which
doesn’t include people from the Far East in common parlance - Oriental is
seen as outdated but if we don’t know which of Chinese, Thai, Filipino, —
and much rarer in U.K., Korean or Japanese — then British people often
still use it, otherwise we use country of origin). Asian is commonly used
for all people of Indian, Nepalese and Pakistani roots, unless we know
their country of origin when we might use it or not depending on context.
The generic PC term is “person of colour” but personally I dislike that one
and so do the black, Asian and Oriental Britons that I know.
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 10:14:19 AM5/18/22
to
In article <t6276l$p3p$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> It would be better for the Timless Child Arc to be totally retconned.
>
>Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
So who do you worship? Jesus Christ or the Pope?
And that is a mutually exclusive or.
>--
>Daniel
>
>"owuld"?? And, even though 'I' is a word, in this case I think the 'I'
>might be a typo as well!!
Just fixed up. Thank you Daniel.
>"owuld"?? And, even though 'I' is a word, in this case I think the 'I'
>might be a typo as well!!
>
>Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
And that is a mutually exclusive or.
>--
>Daniel
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 10:15:09 AM5/18/22
to
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 10:16:00 AM5/18/22
to
In article <t6281g$tpg$2...@dont-email.me>,
>Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:26 am:
>> In article <t605cn$sl9$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>
><Snip>
>
>>>> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble!
>>>> This means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making
>>>> her a completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major
>>>> clue to the fact that the new Rose is a different character is
>>>> the fact that the new Rose has much darker skin than the old
>>>> Rose!
>>>
>>> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
>>> skinned guy??
>>>
>>> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>>
>> Originally and then Indian.
>
>WHAT?? Gobble-de-gook!!
>
You forget End of Time, Dannyboy!
>The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:26 am:
>> In article <t605cn$sl9$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>
><Snip>
>
>>>> But the new Rose is NOT Rose Tyler. She is Rose Temple-Noble!
>>>> This means that she is likely the daughter of Donna Noble, making
>>>> her a completely different character from Rose Tyler! A major
>>>> clue to the fact that the new Rose is a different character is
>>>> the fact that the new Rose has much darker skin than the old
>>>> Rose!
>>>
>>> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
>>> skinned guy??
>>>
>>> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>>
>> Originally and then Indian.
>
>WHAT?? Gobble-de-gook!!
>
>Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
So who do you worship? Jesus Christ or the Pope?
And that is a mutually exclusive or.
And that is a mutually exclusive or.
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 10:16:33 AM5/18/22
to
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 10:17:27 AM5/18/22
to
In article <t628s5$3mi$1...@dont-email.me>,
>
>Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:27 am:
>> In article <t6ednWSbY8MMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
>> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>
><Snip>
>
>>> Look at how the ratings and fallen to 2.2 million, because the show is
>>> only being made for lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals, transexuals, and queers.
>>
>> TOD is really a piece of work.
>
>'TOD'??
TOD! The Other Doctor! Stephen Wilson!!
>The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:27 am:
>> In article <t6ednWSbY8MMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
>> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>
><Snip>
>
>>> Look at how the ratings and fallen to 2.2 million, because the show is
>>> only being made for lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals, transexuals, and queers.
>>
>> TOD is really a piece of work.
>
>'TOD'??
>
>Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
So who do you worship? Jesus Christ or the Pope?
And that is a mutually exclusive or.
>--
>Daniel
And that is a mutually exclusive or.
>--
>Daniel
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 10:18:12 AM5/18/22
to
In article <t62bes$m98$1...@dont-email.me>,
And Indians.
>--
>There are some corners of the universe
> which have bred the most terrible things.
>Things which act against everything we believe in.
>
>They must be /fought/.
The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>--
>There are some corners of the universe
> which have bred the most terrible things.
>Things which act against everything we believe in.
>
>They must be /fought/.
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 18, 2022, 3:23:27 PM5/18/22
to
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>
> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
Does a lawsuit loom?
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 18, 2022, 3:25:25 PM5/18/22
to
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 7:16:33 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <36ace02f-4d0b-4924...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:40:24 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
> >> The Last Doctor wrote on 17/05/2022 11:18 pm:
> >> > Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> <Snip>
> >> >> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
> >> >> skinned guy??
> >> >>
> >> >> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
> >> >
> >> > We don’t do that sort of thing, it’s not necessary. And why
> >> > American? (Boggle)
> >> Afro-American is an acceptable term in U.S. of A., isn't it??
> >>
> >> I was searching for a British equivalent.
> >> > People might reference their heritage when defining themselves, but
> >> > not in everyday conversation.
> >> >
> >> > Both potential marriages for Donna were to black Britons,
> >> Guess I was just trying to be 'PC' .... and failing!! ;-P
> >>
> >> Is "black Briton" PC?? ;-)
> >
> >If not, can we use "Afro-Brits", or "Afro-Pommes"?
> Pommes?
British, IIRC.
> In article <36ace02f-4d0b-4924...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:40:24 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
> >> The Last Doctor wrote on 17/05/2022 11:18 pm:
> >> > Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> <Snip>
> >> >> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
> >> >> skinned guy??
> >> >>
> >> >> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
> >> >
> >> > We don’t do that sort of thing, it’s not necessary. And why
> >> > American? (Boggle)
> >> Afro-American is an acceptable term in U.S. of A., isn't it??
> >>
> >> I was searching for a British equivalent.
> >> > People might reference their heritage when defining themselves, but
> >> > not in everyday conversation.
> >> >
> >> > Both potential marriages for Donna were to black Britons,
> >> Guess I was just trying to be 'PC' .... and failing!! ;-P
> >>
> >> Is "black Briton" PC?? ;-)
> >
> >If not, can we use "Afro-Brits", or "Afro-Pommes"?
> Pommes?
Blueshirt
May 18, 2022, 4:53:45 PM5/18/22
to
Daniel65 wrote:
>
> Guess I was just trying to be 'PC' .... and failing!! ;-P
>
> Is "black Briton" PC?? ;-)
Why be politically correct? This is Usenet not the BBC canteen,
>
> Guess I was just trying to be 'PC' .... and failing!! ;-P
>
> Is "black Briton" PC?? ;-)
they're black.
All of them.
Except the one's that are not.
Blueshirt
May 18, 2022, 4:53:46 PM5/18/22
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <t62bes$m98$1...@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >
> > The generic PC term is “person of colour” but personally I dislike
> > that one and so do the black, Asian and Oriental Britons that I
> > know.
> >
>
> And Indians.
Indians like Geronimo and Sitting Bull, or Indian like Mahatma Gandhi
> In article <t62bes$m98$1...@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >
> > The generic PC term is “person of colour” but personally I dislike
> > that one and so do the black, Asian and Oriental Britons that I
> > know.
> >
>
> And Indians.
and Vindaloo?
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 6:18:20 PM5/18/22
to
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 6:18:54 PM5/18/22
to
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 6:28:07 PM5/18/22
to
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 6:28:24 PM5/18/22
to
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 18, 2022, 8:12:13 PM5/18/22
to
Rename ourselves "Ware"?
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 18, 2022, 8:41:08 PM5/18/22
to
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
Its not Rose Tyler after all!
> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>
> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 18, 2022, 8:51:03 PM5/18/22
to
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:28:24 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <t63mcn$g2k$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <t62bes$m98$1...@dont-email.me>,
> >> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The generic PC term is “person of colour” but personally I dislike
> >> > that one and so do the black, Asian and Oriental Britons that I
> >> > know.
> >> >
> >>
> >> And Indians.
> >
> >Indians like Geronimo and Sitting Bull, or Indian like Mahatma Gandhi
> >and Vindaloo?
> Like Gandhi.
Gan-D: A pacifist Dalek who likes sea salt.
> In article <t63mcn$g2k$1...@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <t62bes$m98$1...@dont-email.me>,
> >> The Last Doctor <mi...@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The generic PC term is “person of colour” but personally I dislike
> >> > that one and so do the black, Asian and Oriental Britons that I
> >> > know.
> >> >
> >>
> >> And Indians.
> >
> >Indians like Geronimo and Sitting Bull, or Indian like Mahatma Gandhi
> >and Vindaloo?
> Like Gandhi.
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 18, 2022, 8:52:10 PM5/18/22
to
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <469ab446-a2db-4028...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >>
> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> >
> >Does a lawsuit loom?
> Typical stupid Tim.
Aggy was alleging a tort (deception as to the nature of a DW actress).
> In article <469ab446-a2db-4028...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >>
> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> >
> >Does a lawsuit loom?
> Typical stupid Tim.
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 9:17:25 PM5/18/22
to
In article <57c9b164-5649-4f27...@googlegroups.com>,
tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Rename ourselves "Ware"?
No!
tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Rename ourselves "Ware"?
No!
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 9:18:43 PM5/18/22
to
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 9:18:51 PM5/18/22
to
In article <4776b945-88cc-476d...@googlegroups.com>,
Boo!! You must be inspired by Idlehands and Stephen Wilson for such bad humour!
The Doctor
May 18, 2022, 9:19:05 PM5/18/22
to
In article <2f8fc7e2-000b-49c4...@googlegroups.com>,
tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <469ab446-a2db-4028...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>> >>
>> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>> >>
>> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>> >>
>> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>> >
>> >Does a lawsuit loom?
>> Typical stupid Tim.
>
>Aggy was alleging a tort (deception as to the nature of a DW actress).
Was he?
>On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <469ab446-a2db-4028...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>> >>
>> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>> >>
>> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>> >>
>> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>> >
>> >Does a lawsuit loom?
>> Typical stupid Tim.
>
>Aggy was alleging a tort (deception as to the nature of a DW actress).
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 19, 2022, 12:41:49 AM5/19/22
to
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:19:05 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <2f8fc7e2-000b-49c4...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> In article <469ab446-a2db-4028...@googlegroups.com>,
> >> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >> >>
> >> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >> >>
> >> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >> >>
> >> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> >> >
> >> >Does a lawsuit loom?
> >> Typical stupid Tim.
> >
> >Aggy was alleging a tort (deception as to the nature of a DW actress).
> Was he?
He was alleging deception.
> In article <2f8fc7e2-000b-49c4...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> In article <469ab446-a2db-4028...@googlegroups.com>,
> >> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >> >>
> >> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >> >>
> >> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >> >>
> >> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
> >> >
> >> >Does a lawsuit loom?
> >> Typical stupid Tim.
> >
> >Aggy was alleging a tort (deception as to the nature of a DW actress).
> Was he?
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 19, 2022, 12:42:28 AM5/19/22
to
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <13cef8df-66b1-41d5...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> >Its not Rose Tyler after all!
> >
> >https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
> Still A Donna daughter?
That's the impression I get.
> In article <13cef8df-66b1-41d5...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> >Its not Rose Tyler after all!
> >
> >https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
> Still A Donna daughter?
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 19, 2022, 12:43:27 AM5/19/22
to
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <13cef8df-66b1-41d5...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> >Its not Rose Tyler after all!
> >
> >https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
> Still A Donna daughter?
I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter "Rose"!
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> >>
> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
> >>
> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
> >
> >Its not Rose Tyler after all!
> >
> >https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
> Still A Donna daughter?
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 19, 2022, 12:44:07 AM5/19/22
to
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:17:25 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> In article <57c9b164-5649-4f27...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Rename ourselves "Ware"?
>
> No!
How else can we "Be Ware"?
> In article <57c9b164-5649-4f27...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Rename ourselves "Ware"?
>
> No!
Daniel65
May 19, 2022, 3:25:12 AM5/19/22
to
The Doctor wrote on 19/5/22 8:18 am:
The singular is 'PoME', or Pommie!!
Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel
> In article <c7a8bede-56ab-4d2c...@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 7:16:33 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <36ace02f-4d0b-4924...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:40:24 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> The Last Doctor wrote on 17/05/2022 11:18 pm:
>>>>>> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
>>>>>>> skinned guy??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We don’t do that sort of thing, it’s not necessary. And why
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 7:16:33 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <36ace02f-4d0b-4924...@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 12:40:24 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> The Last Doctor wrote on 17/05/2022 11:18 pm:
>>>>>> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>> Wasn't Donna originally supposed to have been marrying a Dark
>>>>>>> skinned guy??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (What should I call him?? A British Afro-American, or some such??)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> American? (Boggle)
>>>>> Afro-American is an acceptable term in U.S. of A., isn't it??
>>>>>
>>>>> I was searching for a British equivalent.
>>>>>> People might reference their heritage when defining themselves, but
>>>>>> not in everyday conversation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both potential marriages for Donna were to black Britons,
>>>>> Guess I was just trying to be 'PC' .... and failing!! ;-P
>>>>>
>>>>> Is "black Briton" PC?? ;-)
>>>>
>>>> If not, can we use "Afro-Brits", or "Afro-Pommes"?
>>> Pommes?
>>
>> British, IIRC.
>
> I doubt you spelt it correctly.
As it is an abbreviation for "Prisoner of Mother England"!
>>>>> Afro-American is an acceptable term in U.S. of A., isn't it??
>>>>>
>>>>> I was searching for a British equivalent.
>>>>>> People might reference their heritage when defining themselves, but
>>>>>> not in everyday conversation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both potential marriages for Donna were to black Britons,
>>>>> Guess I was just trying to be 'PC' .... and failing!! ;-P
>>>>>
>>>>> Is "black Briton" PC?? ;-)
>>>>
>>>> If not, can we use "Afro-Brits", or "Afro-Pommes"?
>>> Pommes?
>>
>> British, IIRC.
>
> I doubt you spelt it correctly.
The singular is 'PoME', or Pommie!!
Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
Daniel
Daniel65
May 19, 2022, 3:37:06 AM5/19/22
to
The Doctor wrote on 19/5/22 12:17 am:
abbreviation stood for, clown??
Something YOU, clown, have admonished Tim for doing in the past, clown!!
"Do as I say, not as I do!!"
When I first read it, I thought your 'TOD' was your stuffed up way of
spelling "TODAY" but couldn't work out what "TODAY is really a piece of
work." was supposed to mean, clown!!
Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel
> In article <t628s5$3mi$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:27 am:
>>> In article <t6ednWSbY8MMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
>>> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>> Look at how the ratings and fallen to 2.2 million, because the
>>>> show is only being made for lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals,
>>>> transexuals, and queers.
>>>
>>> TOD is really a piece of work.
>>
>> 'TOD'??
>
> TOD! The Other Doctor! Stephen Wilson!!
So did YOU, clown, use an abbreviation *WITHOUT* explaining what that
> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:27 am:
>>> In article <t6ednWSbY8MMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
>>> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>> Look at how the ratings and fallen to 2.2 million, because the
>>>> show is only being made for lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals,
>>>> transexuals, and queers.
>>>
>>> TOD is really a piece of work.
>>
>> 'TOD'??
>
> TOD! The Other Doctor! Stephen Wilson!!
abbreviation stood for, clown??
Something YOU, clown, have admonished Tim for doing in the past, clown!!
"Do as I say, not as I do!!"
When I first read it, I thought your 'TOD' was your stuffed up way of
spelling "TODAY" but couldn't work out what "TODAY is really a piece of
work." was supposed to mean, clown!!
Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
Daniel
Daniel65
May 19, 2022, 3:40:15 AM5/19/22
to
Blueshirt
May 19, 2022, 3:40:54 AM5/19/22
to
Tyler, it was Rose Noble-Temple. It was always likely she would be a
different Rose.
Some people with low IQ's are unable to use common sense before they
start frothing at the mouth though!
Blueshirt
May 19, 2022, 3:40:55 AM5/19/22
to
For once Tim!
Daniel65
May 19, 2022, 3:45:06 AM5/19/22
to
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 19, 2022, 3:57:46 AM5/19/22
to
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 12:40:54 AM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> > > The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> > >
> > > https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-269
> > > 81287
> > >
> > > Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a
> > > man.
> >
> > Its not Rose Tyler after all!
> >
> >
> https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
> Sensible people guessed that anyway... the character's name wasn't Rose
> Tyler, it was Rose Noble-Temple. It was always likely she would be a
> different Rose.
I too had guessed that it wasn't Rose Tyler!
> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> > > The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
> > >
> > > https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-269
> > > 81287
> > >
> > > Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a
> > > man.
> >
> > Its not Rose Tyler after all!
> >
> >
> https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
> Sensible people guessed that anyway... the character's name wasn't Rose
> Tyler, it was Rose Noble-Temple. It was always likely she would be a
> different Rose.
>
> Some people with low IQ's are unable to use common sense before they
> start frothing at the mouth though!
Why would Donna name her daughter "Rose" anyway? She shouldn't have any memory of Rose
> Some people with low IQ's are unable to use common sense before they
> start frothing at the mouth though!
Tyler, since the Doctor suppressed all of her memories of him!
The Last Doctor
May 19, 2022, 4:14:27 AM5/19/22
to
Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to the twentieth
century where you might find life less difficult to cope with. Or not.
What that means is that Donna had a son, who was probably not named Rose.
Trans people tend to select their own names. Now either Wilf or Donna could
have suggested the name Rose to Rose, or Rose could have floated it and
they agreed it was a good name (unconsciously in Donna’s case). Or, you
know, pure coincidence (off screen, deliberate act by RTD to foment exactly
the speculation we’ve seen over the last three days).
--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.
They must be /fought/.
solar penguin
May 19, 2022, 4:30:52 AM5/19/22
to
The Last Doctor let loose with:
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> Still A Donna daughter?
>>>
>>> I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter
>>> "Rose"!
>>
>> Logical.
>>
>> For once Tim!
>>
>
> Um … Yasmin Finney is trans. If you don’t think RTD has cast her because
> Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to the twentieth
> century where you might find life less difficult to cope with. Or not.
>
_but_ trans people shouldn’t only play trans parts.
After all, trans people want to be accepted as normal people
of their chosen gender, so why wouldn’t they be given
the chance to play those parts too?
If you want to ghetto-ise Yasmin Finney into only ever
being trapped playing trans roles, then you’re the one
institutionally transphobic by refusing to accept her as
a proper female actress.
> What that means is that Donna had a son, who was probably not named Rose.
> Trans people tend to select their own names. Now either Wilf or Donna could
> have suggested the name Rose to Rose, or Rose could have floated it and
> they agreed it was a good name (unconsciously in Donna’s case). Or, you
> know, pure coincidence (off screen, deliberate act by RTD to foment exactly
> the speculation we’ve seen over the last three days).
>
--
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 19, 2022, 4:42:48 AM5/19/22
to
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 1:30:52 AM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
> The Last Doctor let loose with:
> > Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Still A Donna daughter?
> >>>
> >>> I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter
> >>> "Rose"!
> >>
> >> Logical.
> >>
> >> For once Tim!
> >>
> >
> > Um … Yasmin Finney is trans. If you don’t think RTD has cast her because
> > Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to the twentieth
> > century where you might find life less difficult to cope with. Or not.
> >
> Other way round. Trans people should play trans parts,
> _but_ trans people shouldn’t only play trans parts.
>
> After all, trans people want to be accepted as normal people
> of their chosen gender, so why wouldn’t they be given
> the chance to play those parts too?
Would you also allow non-trans people to play trans roles?
> The Last Doctor let loose with:
> > Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Still A Donna daughter?
> >>>
> >>> I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter
> >>> "Rose"!
> >>
> >> Logical.
> >>
> >> For once Tim!
> >>
> >
> > Um … Yasmin Finney is trans. If you don’t think RTD has cast her because
> > Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to the twentieth
> > century where you might find life less difficult to cope with. Or not.
> >
> Other way round. Trans people should play trans parts,
> _but_ trans people shouldn’t only play trans parts.
>
> After all, trans people want to be accepted as normal people
> of their chosen gender, so why wouldn’t they be given
> the chance to play those parts too?
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 19, 2022, 4:48:10 AM5/19/22
to
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 1:14:27 AM UTC-7, The Last Doctor wrote:
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>> Still A Donna daughter?
> >>
> >> I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter
> >> "Rose"!
> >
> > Logical.
> >
> > For once Tim!
> >
> Um … Yasmin Finney is trans. If you don’t think RTD has cast her because
> Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to the twentieth
> century where you might find life less difficult to cope with. Or not.
Oddly enough, Aggy thought that Yasmin Finney would be playing ROSE TYLER, probably based on the headline of the article he linked. Rose Tyler would be a NON-Trans role, unless she was secretly a trans way back in the 2000s!
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>> Still A Donna daughter?
> >>
> >> I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter
> >> "Rose"!
> >
> > Logical.
> >
> > For once Tim!
> >
> Um … Yasmin Finney is trans. If you don’t think RTD has cast her because
> Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to the twentieth
> century where you might find life less difficult to cope with. Or not.
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 19, 2022, 5:07:24 AM5/19/22
to
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 1:14:27 AM UTC-7, The Last Doctor wrote:
> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> > tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>> Still A Donna daughter?
> >>
> >> I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter
> >> "Rose"!
> >
> > Logical.
> >
> > For once Tim!
> >
> Um … Yasmin Finney is trans. If you don’t think RTD has cast her because
> Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to the twentieth
> century where you might find life less difficult to cope with. Or not.
https://variety.com/2022/tv/news/heartstopper-yasmin-finney-doctor-who-rose-tyler-1235268305/
> > tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>> Still A Donna daughter?
> >>
> >> I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter
> >> "Rose"!
> >
> > Logical.
> >
> > For once Tim!
> >
> Um … Yasmin Finney is trans. If you don’t think RTD has cast her because
> Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to the twentieth
> century where you might find life less difficult to cope with. Or not.
https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/a40033144/doctor-who-first-look-heartstopper-yasmin-finney-rose/
https://www.whattowatch.com/news/doctor-who-reveals-rose-will-return-but-theres-a-twist
https://www.cinemablend.com/television/after-david-tennant-news-looks-like-doctor-who-is-bringing-rose-tyler-back-in-a-wild-way
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/may/17/yasmin-finney-rose-tyler-trans-doctor-who-russell-t-davies-david-tennant-pass-notes
I can't find the specific announcement that the CHARACTER Rose Temple-Noble will be transgender, only that the ACTRESS is transgender! Where did you, The Last Doctor, read the specific news of the CHARACTER being trans?
tsbr...@gmail.com
May 19, 2022, 5:08:24 AM5/19/22
to
Daniel65
May 19, 2022, 5:39:13 AM5/19/22
to
solar penguin wrote on 19/5/22 6:30 pm:> The Last Doctor let loose with:
So are you suggesting that 'Trans' actors should play both Male AND
Female roles??
Oh, No!! After re-reading your post, you are suggesting that *IF* a
character is a 'Trans' character they should be played by a 'Trans'
Actor! Right??
But, then, on a similar basis, are you suggesting that a 'Straight'
character *MUST* be played by a 'Straight' Actor?? Or would that be too
limiting on the roles that 'Trans' Actors could be cast in??
--
Daniel
>> Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7,
>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> Still A Donna daughter?
>>>>
>>>> I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her
>>>> daughter "Rose"!
>>>
>>> Logical.
>>>
>>> For once Tim!
>>
>> Um … Yasmin Finney is trans. If you don’t think RTD has cast her
>> because Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to
>> the twentieth century where you might find life less difficult to
>> cope with. Or not.
>
> Other way round. Trans people should play trans parts, _but_ trans
> people shouldn’t only play trans parts.
<Snip>
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7,
>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> Still A Donna daughter?
>>>>
>>>> I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her
>>>> daughter "Rose"!
>>>
>>> Logical.
>>>
>>> For once Tim!
>>
>> Um … Yasmin Finney is trans. If you don’t think RTD has cast her
>> because Rose is written as trans then I think you should go back to
>> the twentieth century where you might find life less difficult to
>> cope with. Or not.
>
> Other way round. Trans people should play trans parts, _but_ trans
> people shouldn’t only play trans parts.
So are you suggesting that 'Trans' actors should play both Male AND
Female roles??
Oh, No!! After re-reading your post, you are suggesting that *IF* a
character is a 'Trans' character they should be played by a 'Trans'
Actor! Right??
But, then, on a similar basis, are you suggesting that a 'Straight'
character *MUST* be played by a 'Straight' Actor?? Or would that be too
limiting on the roles that 'Trans' Actors could be cast in??
--
Daniel
solar penguin
May 19, 2022, 6:07:53 AM5/19/22
to
On Thursday, 19 May 2022 at 10:39:13 UTC+1, Daniel declared:
Sorry, I didn't explain that very clearly.
If trans characters are played by cis actors, some viewers may
get the the wrong impression that trans people aren't really
trans but only pretending and acting and playing at being trans.
(Just a man dressed up as a woman, or vice versa.)
You can help avoid this by casting trans actors in trans roles.
OTOH this doesn't mean that trans actors should only ever play
trans roles. Even though Yasmin Finney is trans, it shouldn't
automatically mean that Rose Temple-Noble is.
If trans characters are played by cis actors, some viewers may
get the the wrong impression that trans people aren't really
trans but only pretending and acting and playing at being trans.
(Just a man dressed up as a woman, or vice versa.)
You can help avoid this by casting trans actors in trans roles.
OTOH this doesn't mean that trans actors should only ever play
trans roles. Even though Yasmin Finney is trans, it shouldn't
automatically mean that Rose Temple-Noble is.
solar penguin
May 19, 2022, 6:15:39 AM5/19/22
to
On Thursday, 19 May 2022 at 09:42:48 UTC+1, Tim typed:
I'm neither allowing nor un-allowing anything. Just describing
how things are.
Like I explained to Daniel, when trans characters are played by
become less of a problem.
(Ultimately, I'd love for us to reach the point where anyone of
any race or gender can play any character of any race or
gender. These things just plain shouldn't matter. But we've
got a long way to go before that.)
how things are.
Like I explained to Daniel, when trans characters are played by
cis actors, some viewers may get the the wrong impression
that trans people aren't really trans but only pretending and
acting and playing at being trans.
Hopefully, as society gets more used to trans people, this will
that trans people aren't really trans but only pretending and
acting and playing at being trans.
become less of a problem.
(Ultimately, I'd love for us to reach the point where anyone of
any race or gender can play any character of any race or
gender. These things just plain shouldn't matter. But we've
got a long way to go before that.)
The Doctor
May 19, 2022, 6:57:31 AM5/19/22
to
In article <26d513b2-fea2-4a7d...@googlegroups.com>,
tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:19:05 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <2f8fc7e2-000b-49c4...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> In article <469ab446-a2db-4028...@googlegroups.com>,
>> >> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> >> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>> >> >
>> >> >Does a lawsuit loom?
>> >> Typical stupid Tim.
>> >
>> >Aggy was alleging a tort (deception as to the nature of a DW actress).
>> Was he?
>
>He was alleging deception.
IYIO.
>On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:19:05 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <2f8fc7e2-000b-49c4...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:18:20 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> In article <469ab446-a2db-4028...@googlegroups.com>,
>> >> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> >> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This kind of deception is morally unjustifiable.
>> >> >
>> >> >Does a lawsuit loom?
>> >> Typical stupid Tim.
>> >
>> >Aggy was alleging a tort (deception as to the nature of a DW actress).
>> Was he?
>
>He was alleging deception.
The Doctor
May 19, 2022, 6:58:01 AM5/19/22
to
In article <71e449f6-e949-404d...@googlegroups.com>,
tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <13cef8df-66b1-41d5...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>> >>
>> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>> >>
>> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>> >
>> >Its not Rose Tyler after all!
>> >
>>
>>https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
>> Still A Donna daughter?
>
>That's the impression I get.
She would be brownish not blackish.
>On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <13cef8df-66b1-41d5...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>> >>
>> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>> >>
>> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>> >
>> >Its not Rose Tyler after all!
>> >
>>
>>https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
>> Still A Donna daughter?
>
>That's the impression I get.
The Doctor
May 19, 2022, 6:58:16 AM5/19/22
to
In article <63789530-36c4-413f...@googlegroups.com>,
tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <13cef8df-66b1-41d5...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>> >>
>> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>> >>
>> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>> >
>> >Its not Rose Tyler after all!
>> >
>>
>>https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
>> Still A Donna daughter?
>
>I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter "Rose"!
Wait and see.
>On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 6:18:43 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <13cef8df-66b1-41d5...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> >> The rabid wokery destroying Doctor Who continues.
>> >>
>> >> https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/doctor-who-casts-first-trans-26981287
>> >>
>> >> Rose Tyler has been replaced by RTD with an actor who was born a man.
>> >
>> >Its not Rose Tyler after all!
>> >
>>
>>https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/60th-filming-reveals-who-yasmin-finneys-rose-is-97327.htm
>> Still A Donna daughter?
>
>I bet that Donna's granddad gave her the idea of naming her daughter "Rose"!
The Doctor
May 19, 2022, 6:58:39 AM5/19/22
to
The Doctor
May 19, 2022, 7:06:42 AM5/19/22
to
In article <t64rcm$tqj$1...@dont-email.me>,
Dan's definition of clown comes from
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
JO: Look.
(The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
him.)
DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
But not pommes as in the french for apples, Dannyboy!
Dannyboy just wants his post count to increase.
Are you complaining that your post count is too low Dannyboy?
>
>Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
So who do you worship? Jesus Christ or the Pope?
And that is a mutually exclusive or.
>--
>Daniel
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
JO: Look.
(The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
him.)
DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
But not pommes as in the french for apples, Dannyboy!
Dannyboy just wants his post count to increase.
Are you complaining that your post count is too low Dannyboy?
>
>Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
And that is a mutually exclusive or.
>--
>Daniel
The Doctor
May 19, 2022, 7:07:23 AM5/19/22
to
In article <t64s30$b3o$1...@dont-email.me>,
Dannyboy just wants his post count to increase.
Are you complaining that your post count is too low Dannyboy?
>
Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 19/5/22 12:17 am:
>> In article <t628s5$3mi$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:27 am:
>>>> In article <t6ednWSbY8MMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
>>>> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>>> Look at how the ratings and fallen to 2.2 million, because the
>>>>> show is only being made for lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals,
>>>>> transexuals, and queers.
>>>>
>>>> TOD is really a piece of work.
>>>
>>> 'TOD'??
>>
>> TOD! The Other Doctor! Stephen Wilson!!
>
>So did YOU, clown, use an abbreviation *WITHOUT* explaining what that
>abbreviation stood for, clown??
>
>Something YOU, clown, have admonished Tim for doing in the past, clown!!
>
>"Do as I say, not as I do!!"
>
>When I first read it, I thought your 'TOD' was your stuffed up way of
>spelling "TODAY" but couldn't work out what "TODAY is really a piece of
>work." was supposed to mean, clown!!
>The Doctor wrote on 19/5/22 12:17 am:
>> In article <t628s5$3mi$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:27 am:
>>>> In article <t6ednWSbY8MMAx7_...@brightview.co.uk>,
>>>> The True Doctor <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>>> Look at how the ratings and fallen to 2.2 million, because the
>>>>> show is only being made for lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals,
>>>>> transexuals, and queers.
>>>>
>>>> TOD is really a piece of work.
>>>
>>> 'TOD'??
>>
>> TOD! The Other Doctor! Stephen Wilson!!
>
>So did YOU, clown, use an abbreviation *WITHOUT* explaining what that
>abbreviation stood for, clown??
>
>Something YOU, clown, have admonished Tim for doing in the past, clown!!
>
>"Do as I say, not as I do!!"
>
>When I first read it, I thought your 'TOD' was your stuffed up way of
>spelling "TODAY" but couldn't work out what "TODAY is really a piece of
>work." was supposed to mean, clown!!
Dan's definition of clown comes from
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
JO: Look.
(The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
him.)
DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
Do try to keep up, Dannyboy!
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
JO: Look.
(The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
him.)
DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
Dannyboy just wants his post count to increase.
Are you complaining that your post count is too low Dannyboy?
>
>Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
>say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
The Doctor
May 19, 2022, 7:07:34 AM5/19/22
to
The Doctor
May 19, 2022, 7:08:07 AM5/19/22
to
The Doctor
May 19, 2022, 7:13:27 AM5/19/22
to
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages