Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: In the middle of the 3rd season

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Elko Tchernev

unread,
Dec 25, 2007, 1:18:26 PM12/25/07
to
been quite impossible to use
the A vocabulary for literary purposes or for political or philosophical
discussion. It was intended only to express simple, purposive thoughts,
usually involving concrete objects or physical actions.

The grammar of Newspeak had two outstanding peculiarities. The first of
these was an almost complete interchangeability between different parts
of speech. Any word in the language (in principle this applied even to
very abstract words such as if or when) could be used either as verb,
noun, adjective, or adverb. Between the verb and the noun form, when
they were of the same root, there was never any variation, this rule of
itself involving the destruction of many archaic forms. The word
thought, for example, did not exist in Newspeak. Its place was taken by
think, which did duty for both noun and verb. No etymological principle
was followed here: in some cases it was the original noun that was
chosen for retention, in other cases the verb. Even where a noun and
verb of kindred meaning were not etymologically connected, one or other
of them was frequently suppressed. There was, for example, no such word
as cut, its meaning being sufficiently covered by the noun-verb knife.
Adjectives were formed by adding the suffix -ful to the noun-verb, and
adverbs by adding -wise. Thu


0 new messages