Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

End of the World - Ratings are in

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Distant Dave

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 5:00:23 AM4/3/05
to
Almost 7.3m according to Viewingfigures.com - respectable.

--
Distant Dave

David A McIntee

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 6:44:38 AM4/3/05
to
"Distant Dave" <da...@distant.co.uk> wrote in message
news:HNKkk4rH...@home.distant.gotadsl.co.uk...

> Almost 7.3m according to Viewingfigures.com - respectable.
>

Yep.
Doctor Who 7.27 million 36.05% share
And and Dec 6.024 million 30.86% share

Casualty 7.5 million 34.3% share

Given the change in clocks, better weather, and Ant and Dec having Tony
Bliar on and starting 15 minutes early, DW still comfortably beats them.

They finish in four weeks as well, so that should lead to a nice rise in
audience for the Dalek episode as well, and possibly even settle around the
8 million mark for the second half of the season.

--
--
"If I make a success of this, and if I make a mint of money, several hundred
guineas, say, the first thing I shall do after paying-off is go to Vienna,
to the opera." [Captain Jack Aubrey]

Redemption 07, February 23-25 2007 http://www.smof.com/redemption

Currently reading: Currently reading: Master & Commander (second attempt!)
[Patrick O'Brien]

http://www.livejournal.com/~lonemagpie

Alan G McWhan

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 6:59:23 AM4/3/05
to
"Distant Dave" <da...@distant.co.uk> wrote in message
news:HNKkk4rH...@home.distant.gotadsl.co.uk...
> Almost 7.3m according to Viewingfigures.com - respectable.

Isn't it still a little early for the figures to come out?

I mean, it was mid-afternoon last week before ANYTHING came out but so far
there have been two sources for EOTW before mid-day, both quoting different
numbers.

Martin Hoscik

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 7:06:49 AM4/3/05
to
David A McIntee wrote:

> Given the change in clocks, better weather, and Ant and Dec having Tony
> Bliar on and starting 15 minutes early, DW still comfortably beats them.

Plus it's possible a lot of people who *may* have watched last week
could have been watching the news for developments on the Pope's condition.

I'm not suggesting that it makes the 3million difference between last
week and this but it could account for a few hundred thousand.

--
Martin Hoscik
www.unitnews.co.uk - Articles, News & Forums

David A McIntee

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 7:15:10 AM4/3/05
to
"Alan G McWhan" <Thi...@ngeEngine.fsnet.co.uk> wrote

> > Almost 7.3m according to Viewingfigures.com - respectable.
>
> Isn't it still a little early for the figures to come out?
>
> I mean, it was mid-afternoon last week before ANYTHING came out but so far
> there have been two sources for EOTW before mid-day, both quoting
different
> numbers.

Viewingfigures.com is BARB's official site- I know which source I'd believe!

Emmemm

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 8:45:49 AM4/3/05
to
"David A McIntee" <david....@btNOTopenTOSPAMMERSworld.com> wrote in
message news:424fc8fd$0$1373$892e...@authen.white.readfreenews.net...

> They finish in four weeks as well, so that should lead to a nice rise
in
> audience for the Dalek episode as well, and possibly even settle
around the
> 8 million mark for the second half of the season.

Reports still saying that the ITV strike may take them off air sooner
than that!

As for the Who ratings - do we know where the peak was? Did people
switch off during the episode?
--
Frank
"Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes. There's too much
fraternizing with the enemy." - Henry Kissinger

Lance Parkin

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 9:12:28 AM4/3/05
to
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:59:23 -0500, "Alan G McWhan"
<Thi...@ngeEngine.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

>I mean, it was mid-afternoon last week before ANYTHING came out but so far
>there have been two sources for EOTW before mid-day, both quoting different
>numbers.

It was Easter Sunday last week - the ratings usually come out just
before midday on a normal weekday.

Lance

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 9:58:40 AM4/3/05
to
In article <HNKkk4rH...@home.distant.gotadsl.co.uk>,

Distant Dave <da...@distant.co.uk> wrote:
>Almost 7.3m according to Viewingfigures.com - respectable.
>

Very. What about in comparison to other shows in the same time slot?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
UK as 5 May 2005 approaches, vote LDem!!

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 9:58:12 AM4/3/05
to
In article <424fc8fd$0$1373$892e...@authen.white.readfreenews.net>,

David A McIntee <david....@btNOTopenTOSPAMMERSworld.com> wrote:
>"Distant Dave" <da...@distant.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:HNKkk4rH...@home.distant.gotadsl.co.uk...
>> Almost 7.3m according to Viewingfigures.com - respectable.
>>
>
>Yep.
>Doctor Who 7.27 million 36.05% share
>And and Dec 6.024 million 30.86% share
>
>Casualty 7.5 million 34.3% share
>
>Given the change in clocks, better weather, and Ant and Dec having Tony
>Bliar on and starting 15 minutes early, DW still comfortably beats them.
>
>They finish in four weeks as well, so that should lead to a nice rise in
>audience for the Dalek episode as well, and possibly even settle around the
>8 million mark for the second half of the season.
>

sounds like a positive trend. Upwards Bounds we are.

Matthew Sylvester

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 4:48:43 PM4/3/05
to
Emmemm <fr...@askforit.onthe.group> wrote:

> As for the Who ratings - do we know where the peak was? Did people
> switch off during the episode?

No, quite the opposite. Peak was 7.9m in final 15 minutes.

Emmemm

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 7:24:11 PM4/3/05
to

Excellent news. And the way Ant n' Dec got increased ratings once DW
finished seems to show viewers are choosing Dr Who as first choice
(hopefully not taping Ant and Dec either).
--
Frankymole
"Sir, I have given you an argument. I am not also obliged to provide
you with an understanding."

The Doctor

unread,
Apr 3, 2005, 8:57:35 PM4/3/05
to
In article <d2ptil$ghk$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>,

Emmemm <fr...@askforit.onthe.group> wrote:
>Matthew Sylvester wrote:
>> Emmemm <fr...@askforit.onthe.group> wrote:
>>
>>> As for the Who ratings - do we know where the peak was? Did people
>>> switch off during the episode?
>>
>> No, quite the opposite. Peak was 7.9m in final 15 minutes.
>
>Excellent news. And the way Ant n' Dec got increased ratings once DW
>finished seems to show viewers are choosing Dr Who as first choice
>(hopefully not taping Ant and Dec either).
>--

Looks as if A & D and on their way out. Maybe they need to reschedule.

gclap...@cix.compulink.co.uk

unread,
Apr 4, 2005, 5:04:20 AM4/4/05
to
In article <d2ptil$ghk$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, fr...@askforit.onthe.group
(Emmemm) wrote:

> (hopefully not taping Ant and Dec either).

Hey, let's not begrudge Ant and Dec their success - they work damned hard
and are very popular!

0 new messages