On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:01:30 -0800 (PST), BigBob <
BlG...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"Sheesh. I'll have to keep this in mind the next time someone tries
>to point out the greed in Disney... "
>
>Or, some might argue that, Universal is giving their guests *some*
>Harry Potter regardless of which park they buy a single-day ticket to.
>
>In actuality, I'm led to believe that, splitting Harry Potter between
>the two parks has a great deal to do with what land is available and
>where it's located.
Yes and no. My big complaint is until Potter came along, was IoA has
been stagnant since it opened 14(?) years ago. (14 years? Really?)
They could have taken out the rest of Lost Continent right next door,
and even gone into the backstage area, since they had to prep another
piece of real estate for the parade units and other things that won't
fit under Hogwart's Express in another part of USF anyway, and had
just about the same amount of space.
That would have been a better upgrade for IoA. UO has made
plenty of changes at USF. They could have put another movie
franchise where Jaws was.
(There is also a large area on the other side of the Royal Pacific
that's graded and looks like it might belong to Universal. If so,
they could have migrated part of IoA that way.)
>That, and I'm sure that there is a very positive crowd management
>benefit obtained by splitting the Harry Potter hordes between the two
>properties.
>Futhermore, the current size of Harry Potter in IoA could not begin to
>handle the additional crowds the expansion will pull in (i.e. not in
>the limited space available to contain Harry Potter within the one
>park).
From what I understand crowds at IoA are pretty reasonable now.
It's only the initial shockwave of Potter fans that'll overwhelm the
park.
Once Potter opens at USF with the crossover from IoA, you're only
going to have two unvisitable parks instead of one.
>How much would you want to bet that Disney would take the entire Harry
>Potter enterprise, after and including the expansion, and turn it into
>a third gate?
>(Yeah, tell me I'm way off-base with the third gate barb.) ROFL
No. Not Potter. Middle Earth. Try to think positive.
>Looking at the "greed" scale, we can directly compare WDW with
>Universal.
>
>BOTH properties will cost you $120/per day for ticket media that will
>enable you to "park-hop" (i.e. visit more than one park on the same
>day.
>
>However, if we look at two days, we find that:
>
>Universal will cost you $135.99 for a two-day ticket that allows "park-
>to-park admission."
>
http://www.universalorlando.com/Theme-Park-Tickets/General-Admission.aspx
>
>WDW will cost you $168 for a two-day ticket.
>And, a whopping $223 for a two-day ticket with "Park Hopper option."
>
http://disneyworld.disney.go.com/tickets-passes/
>(then click on "Buy Now" to go to calculate the price of your ticket
>and options)
>
>How dare those greedy so-and-so's at Universal give you two-days, with
>full park-to-park access, for $87.01 *less* than at WDW!
>
>* All prices quoted in this post do not include sales tax
Yes. This is the exact argument that Universal Orlando makes in
it's advertising.
Where it ultimately fails (and I tell UO this every time they survey
me on ticket options), it's deceiving, as it only looks at price.
Not content.
I can do *EVERYTHING* at USF and IoA in two days, including doing
attractions like MiB, Simpsons, Spiderman, etc. more than once. They
are both relatively small parks. That would even include City Walk,
since the hours at the parks are typically shorter than at Disney, and
close earlier. There would be no reason for me to be at UO for more
than those two days. (Unless you're a thrill ride junkie more than a
Disney Junkie, I'll admit.)
This isn't true at Disney. If you're going to be honest about it, it
would take 4-5 days to cover Disney the way I could Universal.
*Then* if you then figure cost per day, the figures change to
Disney's favor.
So, yeah, if you just want to compare a two-day vs. two-day
ticket, you are correct. If you're a real life tourist who is going
to Orlando to vacation for a week, you're going to spend
two at UO, and five at WDW, and compare cost per day, not
cost of ticket.
Caren recently went to Universal to see Potter. Did she get a
multi-park pass? I don't think so. (I could be wrong. :-))
Now, if Boom is right, and they're going to charge a one-park/
one-attraction ticket, then I withdraw my complaint.
But not about the 2-day ticket price thing. More realistic is cost
per day of how people actually vacation.