_Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth_
Thomas Friedman
"John P David" <dadd...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a31ub0$qch$1...@newsreader.mailgate.org...
>
> "Marjorie Knoller" <Marjorie...@sybil.brand.org> wrote in message
> news:MPG.16bddae51...@24.2.2.74...
> >for Jesus Christ has said of the Jews,
>
> To the Rotten Witch writing this.
Well, clearly you don't know her name. Marjorie Knoller is on trial for allowing her dog
to eat a lesbian in San Francisco. She also stands accused, though not in court, of having
sex with the dog. Further, though Marjorie is a Jew, or to quote her attorney "a nice
Jewish girl from Brooklyn", she has adopted as her son a high level member of the Aryan
Brotherhood prison gang currently doing a near life term in Pelican Bay.
> "Marjorie Knoller" <Marjorie...@sybil.brand.org> wrote in message
> news:MPG.16bde02f9...@24.2.2.74...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> >
> > Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth
> >
> >
> > One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish
> > media is the following from Mein Kampf, I:10:
> >
> > "The great masses of people ... will more easily fall victims to a big
> > lie than to a small one."
> >
> > Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to portray
> > this statement as Hitler's own, personal philosophy or strategy. But
> > if we read this selection in context, we find that he is speaking of
> > the Jews who had ruined his country, and he is trying to explain how
> > the German people fell victim to Jewish lies. In fact, Herr Hitler
> > even tells us what this great lie is that duped the German people into
> > being controlled by the Jews. He continues:
> >
> > "Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the
> > application of untruth and defamation, however, were at all times the
> > Jews; for their entire existence is built on one single great lie,
> > namely, that here one had to deal with a religious brotherhood, while
> > in fact one has to deal with a race - what a race! As such they have
> > been nailed down forever, in an eternally correct sentence of
> > fundamental truth, by one of the greatest minds of mankind; he called
> > them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does not realize this or
> > does not want to believe this will never be able to help truth to
> > victory in this world."
> >
> > Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the eminent 19th
> > century German philosopher who was outspoken regarding the true nature
> > of Jews. We do not need to rely upon the opinions of German
> > philosophers and political leaders regarding this character trait of
> > the Jews, for Jesus Christ has said of the Jews,
> >
> > "You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your
> > father you wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning, and
> > he has not stood in the truth because there is no truth in him. When
> > he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own, because he is a liar, and the
> > father of it" (John 8:44 AST).
> >
> > Furthermore, the New Testament warns us not to listen to "Judaizing
> > myths" (Titus 1:14). But Jewish myths are exactly what destroyed
> > Germany and what have destroyed America today. Herr Hitler may have
> > been correct in what he felt was the greatest Jewish lie, but there
> > are many, many more which have had a damning effect on the white race.
> > One of the greatest is certainly the lie of the Hebrew Masoretic Text
> > and the removal of the Greek Septuagint from the hands of white
> > Christians, but each Jewish myth stings with the same poisonous venom.
> > One of the great Jewish myths of the 20th century is Albert Einstein.
> >
> > Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius who
> > drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. As such, he is
> > made an idol to young people and his very name has become synonymous
> > with genius. The truth, however, is very different. The reality is
> > that Einstein was an inept, moronic Jew who could not even tie his own
> > shoelaces; he contributed nothing original to the field of quantum
> > mechanics or any other science, but on the contrary he stole the ideas
> > of other men and the Jewish media made him a hero.
> >
> > When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his
> > only brilliance lies in his ability to plagiarize and steal other
> > people's ideas, passing them off as his own.
> >
> > Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this
> > story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education
> > that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the
> > age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he
> > left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper
> > of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein
> > failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich. This
> > exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed
> > himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a
> > lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering
> > school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still
> > could not get a position at the engineering school! Unable to go to
> > the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend)
> > at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third
> > class, which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified
> > position. Even after publishing his so-called groundbreaking papers of
> > 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only
> > elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing
> > at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not
> > quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical
> > documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely
> > qualified.
> >
> > He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while
> > continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without
> > success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the Jewish myth.
> > Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of
> > university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or
> > any of the things normally associated with an academic setting,
> > Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the
> > field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published
> > in 1905. Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat,
> > including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to
> > believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the
> > blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an
> > admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of
> > 26 without any real education. However, a simpler explanation exists:
> > he stole the ideas and plagiarized the papers.
> >
> > Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source
> > of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by
> > Einstein's worshippers as totally new and completely different, each
> > of which would change the landscape of science. These four papers
> > dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:
> >
> >
> > 1. The foundation of the photon theory of light;
> > 2. The equivalence of energy and mass;
> > 3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
> > 4. The special theory of relativity.
> > Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of
> > relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to
> > Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein
> > called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come
> > in 1915). This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics
> > and was based upon two premises: 1) in the absence of acceleration,
> > the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and 2) since the
> > speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the
> > time interval between two events is longer for an observer in whose
> > frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an
> > observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same
> > place. This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as
> > one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower
> > velocities where time would pass faster.
> >
> > This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis
> > for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being
> > originally Einstein's. First of all, the idea that the speed of light
> > was a constant and was independent of the motion of its source was not
> > Einstein's at all, but was proposed by the Scottish scientist James
> > Maxwell. Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first
> > proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature. He wrote an article to
> > this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His
> > ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and
> > the ensuing debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz,
> > Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the velocity of
> > light was independent of the velocity of the observer. Thus, this
> > piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years before
> > Einstein wrote his paper.
> >
> > This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to
> > conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be
> > explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by
> > relativity but they did not understand relativity. They had attempted
> > to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium
> > thought to be necessary for the propagation of light.
> >
> > In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George
> > FitzGerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing
> > radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the
> > Michelson-Morley experiment could be explained if,
> >
> > "... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are
> > moving through the ether or across it, by an amount depending on the
> > square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light."
> >
> > This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper!
> >
> > Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands, proposed
> > the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout
> > the 1890's, both Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and
> > wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory
> > detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction. In
> > 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the
> > Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7
> > years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, Lorentz transformations, the
> > series of equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz.
> > They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the
> > time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of
> > light. In short, by 1904, everything in Einstein's paper regarding the
> > Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.
> >
> > The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of
> > these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper that,
> >
> > "... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time
> > intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their
> > succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be
> > defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as
> > simple as possible."
> >
> > Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize
> > the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein.
> > Thus we see that the only thing original about the paper was the term
> > 'Special Theory of Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized. Over
> > the next few years, Poincaré became one of the most important
> > lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of
> > his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus, while
> > Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed
> > regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office
> > in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to
> > give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early
> > physicists knew that he was a fraud.
> >
> > This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of
> > another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the
> > irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal energy of the
> > molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement
> > had first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827.
> > The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory
> > of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian
> > Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert
> > Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion
> > contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they
> > had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper
> > regarding Brownian motion.
> >
> > The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a
> > third paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed
> > by the famous equation E=mc^2. Einstein's biographers categorize this
> > as "his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this
> > idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper,
> > it was not included in that paper but was published as an afterthought
> > later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not
> > original with Einstein.
> >
> > That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown
> > in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and
> > by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré had shown that there
> > was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just
> > electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's
> > plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet
> > unappreciated physicists of the era. Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many
> > of the German scientists who would later become famous for a variety
> > of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and
> > energy for many years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904
> > in the very same journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized
> > version in 1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenörhl had
> > received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of
> > Sciences.
> >
> > Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a
> > simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish
> > physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the
> > mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc^2 was the
> > logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it. Thus,
> > the experiments of Thomson, Kaufmann, and finally, and most
> > importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work. It is ludicrous to
> > believe that Einstein developed this postulate, particularly in light
> > of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to
> > conduct the appropriate experiments.
> >
> > In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the
> > scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this
> > theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree
> > (e.g., salts of radium)." This remark demonstrates how little Einstein
> > understood about science, for this was truly an outlandish remark. By
> > saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not understand basic
> > scientific principles and that he was writing about a topic that he
> > did not understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht
> > remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible
> > experience."
> >
> > The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the
> > foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the
> > photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is the release of
> > electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action of
> > light. This area of research is particularly important to the Einstein
> > myth because it was for this topic that he unjustly received his 1922
> > Nobel Prize.
> >
> > But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck who
> > deserve the credit. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point
> > for which he is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in
> > finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the
> > photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect had been explained by
> > Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard,
> > worked on understanding this phenomenon. Lenard was the first to show
> > that the energy of the electrons released in the photoelectric effect
> > was not governed by the intensity of the light but by the frequency of
> > the light. This was an important breakthrough.
> >
> > Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern
> > day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's
> > work, had shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in
> > finite units called quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900
> > and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to
> > talking about one particular type of energy - light energy. But the
> > principles and equations governing the process in general had been
> > deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious
> > conclusion of Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete
> > packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was
> > original.
> >
> > After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific
> > community took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the
> > patent office until 1909 when it was arranged for him to take a
> > position at a school by World Jewry. Still, it was not until a 1919
> > newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety.
> >
> > With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a
> > position where he could begin to use other people's work as his own
> > more openly. He engaged many of his students to look for ways to prove
> > the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply those
> > theories, and then he could present the research as his own or at
> > least take partial credit. In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and
> > express his gravitational research in terms of a new, recently
> > developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity.
> > This was the beginning of his General Theory of Relativity, which he
> > would publish in 1915. But the mathematical work was not done by
> > Einstein - he was incapable of it. Instead, it was performed by the
> > mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical
> > principles developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop
> > a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics
> > used to describe relativity.
> >
> > The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity
> > to the universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and
> > their orbits, and the general principle that light rays bend as they
> > pass by a massive object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913
> > based upon the work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann
> > to Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the
> > conclusions were incorrect. It appears that Grossmann was not smart
> > enough to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look
> > elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his
> > correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its
> > publication that he, "...completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert
> > and Klein." He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most
> > brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein, another
> > mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area
> > of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of
> > Relativity for Einstein.
> >
> > Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to
> > believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions
> > regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their
> > thinking. However, the exact opposite is true. Einstein stole the
> > majority of his General Relativity work from these two men, the rest
> > being taken from Grossmann. Hilbert submitted for publication, a week
> > before Einstein completed his work, a paper which contained the
> > correct field equations of General Relativity. What this means is that
> > Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the same
> > conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have had an
> > opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were
> > Jewish friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not
> > necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of
> > publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed,
> > delivered in the form of a lecture.
> >
> > Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and
> > Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On
> > November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for
> > sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the
> > 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two
> > weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered
> > their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of
> > his. Therefore, this serves as incontrovertible proof that Einstein
> > quickly plagiarized the work and then presented it, hoping to beat
> > Hilbert to the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began
> > to belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised
> > him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert
> > made the mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he
> > delivered his work first.
> >
> > Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher
> > quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many
> > problems with assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We
> > know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper
> > is the forerunner of the unified field theory of gravitation and
> > electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is
> > the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.
> >
> > That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of
> > the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community
> > all along. In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria
> > declared that "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz,
> > Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory
> > of relativity..."
> >
> > However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The
> > Jewish media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead
> > they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein. As we mentioned
> > earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and in
> > plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should
> > bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse
> > of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun was
> > observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported the
> > General Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-controlled media
> > immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero,
> > at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.
> >
> > On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline
> > of which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New theory of the
> > Universe - Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the
> > force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following
> > years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein
> > was heralded as the originator of all the ideas he had stolen. Because
> > of this push by the Jewish media, in 1922, Einstein received the Nobel
> > Prize for the work he had stolen in 1905 regarding the photoelectric
> > effect.
> >
> > The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an
> > important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had
> > been established as an idol to the popular masses of England and
> > America, his image was promoted as the rare genius that he is
> > erroneously believed to be today. As such, he immediately began his
> > work as a tool for World Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that
> > if someone was so brilliant as to change our fundamental understanding
> > of the universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions
> > regarding political and social issues. This is exactly what World
> > Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of social engineering.
> > They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert to be
> > recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a
> > strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two middle
> > names were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In
> > August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken regarding
> > installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a
> > proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along with other leading
> > German scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So the
> > Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit he
> > deserved.
> >
> > The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved
> > either. This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been
> > important German theologians, and during World War II he would stay in
> > Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he
> > could.
> >
> > The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to
> > be heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would
> > go on to teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a
> > public letter expressing his support for the Third Reich. This
> > Austrian's work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern
> > physics, even though it had been criticized by Einstein, who
> > apparently could not understand it.
> >
> > The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare
> > genius, even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and
> > contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty
> > principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus and
> > the binding energies that are essential to modern chemistry. No, the
> > Jews did not want Heisenberg promoted as a genius because he would go
> > on to head the German atomic bomb project and serve prison time after
> > the war for his involvement with the Third Reich.
> >
> > No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of white
> > Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and
> > even Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and
> > evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work. Instead,
> > they needed to erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he
> > repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or
> > nearsighted comments regarding the work he had supposedly done. For
> > example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page article
> > in which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of
> > practical applications for the "energy of the atom." The article says,
> >
> > "But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe
> > that man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to
> > drive a great steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for
> > instance-then, according to Einstein, you are wrong..."
> >
> > Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he
> > had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time
> > theoretical research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb
> > and nuclear energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919,
> > he made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he
> > began his real purpose - evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and
> > World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles after this time, all
> > of them were co-authored by at least one other person, and in each
> > instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that
> > led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the co-authors in
> > order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of
> > academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.
> >
> > In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a
> > fund-raising tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to
> > promote Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to gain
> > membership in a Commission of the League of Nations. In February of
> > 1923, Einstein visits Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he
> > becomes a founding member of the Association of Friends of the New
> > Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist and
> > Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by
> > criticizing the work of Schrödinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief
> > illness, he resumes his Zionistic agenda, wanting an independent
> > Israel and at the same time a World Government.
> >
> > In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although
> > he would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated
> > war against Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he
> > thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the
> > request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an
> > American program to develop an atomic bomb to be used on Germany - not
> > Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual construction of the
> > bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the skills for
> > either.
> >
> > In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World
> > Government, with Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation.
> > This push continues through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein,
> > who had been instrumental in the creation of the State of Israel, both
> > politically and economically, is offered the presidency of Israel. He
> > declines. In 1953, he spends his time attacking the McCarthy
> > Committee, and he supports Communists such as J. Robert Oppenheimer.
> > He encourages civil disobedience in response to the McCarthy trials.
> > Finally, on April 18, 1955, this filthy Jewish demagogue dies.
> >
> > Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid
> > statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage and
> > exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media continued to
> > promote the myth of this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more
> > and more of the men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and
> > more able to aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly. This brazen
> > lying has culminated in the Jew controlled Time magazine naming
> > Einstein "The Person of the Century" at the close of 1999. It may be
> > demonstrated that the Jewish lies have become more bold with the
> > passage of time because Einstein was never named "Man of the Year"
> > while he was alive, but now, over forty years after his death, he is
> > named "Person of the Century."
> >
> > Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the
> > "Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of
> > the Year" while he was still living by Time magazine, and according to
> > a December 27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen
> > over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public relations
> > fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet in internet polling by
> > Time, Hitler finished third and was the top serious candidate. Still
> > the issue of Time magazine dedicated to Einstein, which has articles
> > by men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and
> > Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one, they found it necessary
> > to include an article rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious
> > choice, Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article by Stephen
> > Hawking which purports to be a history of the theory of relativity. In
> > it, Hawking admits many of the things in this article, such as the
> > fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of Relativity before
> > Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of
> > relativity long before Einstein. Hawking also writes,
> >
> > "Einstein...was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in
> > Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrödinger in Zurich,
> > who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. ...
> > Einstein was horrified by this ... Most scientists, however, accepted
> > the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent
> > agreement with observations ... They are the basis of modern
> > developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the
> > foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the
> > past half-century."
> >
> > This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all
> > of the modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein
> > was so stupid as to be vehemently against the most important idea of
> > modern science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work in unified field
> > theory which was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that
> > "success eluded" Einstein in the field of explaining the
> > contradictions between relativity and quantum mechanics. Today, these
> > contradictions are explained by the unified field theory, but
> > Einstein, who proves himself to be one of the least intelligent of
> > 20th century scientists, refused to believe in either quantum theory
> > or the unified field theory.
> >
> > To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most
> > ludicrous and absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully
> > pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and
> > the Jewish owners of Time magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give
> > the title to an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice
> > would have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg. If they
> > wanted to give it to the scientist who most fundamentally changed the
> > landscape of 20th century science, then the obvious choice would be
> > William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the
> > transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic devices and
> > computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and
> > watches, to the amazing computers which have allowed incomprehensible
> > advances in all fields of science. Without the transistor, all forms
> > of science today would be basically in the same place that they were
> > in the late 1940s.
> >
> > However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William
> > Shockley because he spent the majority of his scientific career
> > demonstrating the genetic and mental inferiority of non-whites and
> > arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the
> > Jews to financially destroy Shockley who founded the first company in
> > the Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop computer chips. The Jews
> > hired away his entire staff and used them to start Fairchild
> > semiconductor, the company that today is known as Intel.
> >
> > No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time
> > be recognized, not the anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great German
> > scientists who helped the National Socialists in Germany, not Charles
> > Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and
> > certainly not William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists
> > and geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist,
> > Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything white.
> >
> > After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race
> > and of the Germans in particular in the following statements. He was
> > asked what he thought about Germany and about re-educating the Germans
> > after the war and said,
> >
> > "The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since
> > 1870...Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected
> > Hitler after he had in his book and in his speeches made his shameful
> > intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. ... The
> > Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be
> > re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting..."
> >
> >
>
>
Hugh Watkins
"Thomas Friedman" <Thomas_...@optonline.com> wrote in message news:V2658.99462$6L5.16...@news02.optonline.net...
>
> "John P David" <dadd...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:a31ub0$qch$1...@newsreader.mailgate.org...
> >
> > "Marjorie Knoller" <Marjorie...@sybil.brand.org> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.16bddae51...@24.2.2.74...
> > >for Jesus Christ has said of the Jews,
> >
> > To the Rotten Witch writing this.
>
>
>
> Well, clearly you don't know her name. Marjorie Knoller is on trial
snip
How do you know that this "Marjorie Knoller" is the owner of the name ?
Hugh W
Thomas Friedman
"Hugh Watkins" <hugh_w...@net.dialog.dk> wrote in message
news:a33qno$155gla$1...@ID-71976.news.dfncis.de...
>
> "Thomas Friedman" <Thomas_...@optonline.com> wrote in message
news:V2658.99462$6L5.16...@news02.optonline.net...
> >
>
> snip
>
> How do you know that this "Marjorie Knoller" is the owner of the name ?
Marjorie Knoller in the words of her attorney is "a nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn."
Her husband Robert converted to Judaism.
----------------------------------------------
"I hope so," said Knoller's attorney, Nedra Ruiz, who added that she disagreed with the
judge and said that bail of $1 million is "unnecessary" because of no flight risk.
"She's stunned; she feels she deserves release on her own recognizance," Ruiz said about
her client's reaction.
At the hearing, Ruiz described Knoller as a "nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn" with ties to
the community and no criminal record.
----------------------------------------------
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/09/01/MN19935.DTL
Woman's bail cut in half in dog case
Knoller no more risk than Noel, judge says
Jaxon Van Derbeken, Chronicle Staff Writer Saturday, September 1, 2001
San Francisco -- In a surprise move, a San Francisco judge cut bail in half yesterday for
a woman facing second-degree murder charges in the dog-mauling death of her neighbor.
Superior Court Judge James Warren reduced Marjorie Knoller's bail to $1 million from the
$2 million originally set when she was jailed in March along with her husband, Robert
Noel.
Warren said that while Knoller may be facing more serious charges than Noel -- who is
still being held on $1 million bond on manslaughter charges -- she is no more of a risk to
jump bail.
The ruling followed a daylong, often heated hearing in which prosecutors argued that the
accused couple had strong ties to the "vile, vicious, murderous" Aryan Brotherhood prison
gang. Warren kept details of prosecutors' accusations secret to avoid adding to pretrial
publicity surrounding the case.
In arguing against cutting Knoller's bail, the prosecution also said that the couple are
flight risks and that Knoller had done nothing to help Diane Whipple as she lay dying in
her Pacific Heights apartment building after the dog attack.
The defense countered that the prosecution was "cruel" for suggesting that Knoller let
Whipple die after the Jan. 26 attack by the Presa Canario dog that Noel and Knoller had
been keeping.
The defense stressed that both defendants had an unblemished reputation and strong ties to
the community. Far from letting Whipple die, they said, Knoller had acted heroically.
In the end, Warren acknowledged prosecution arguments about the risks involved but ordered
the bail reduced based on his theory of equal flight risk.
Prosecutors had no comment on the ruling, citing Warren's gag order in the case. But a
private attorney suing the couple for wrongful death was puzzled by the decision.
"It doesn't make sense. . . . I don't understand it," said Michael Cardoza, who along with
his client, Sharon Smith, attended the first part of the hearing.
It is unclear whether Knoller can raise even the reduced bail sum.
"I hope so," said Knoller's attorney, Nedra Ruiz, who added that she disagreed with the
judge and said that bail of $1 million is "unnecessary" because of no flight risk.
"She's stunned; she feels she deserves release on her own recognizance," Ruiz said about
her client's reaction.
At the hearing, Ruiz described Knoller as a "nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn" with ties to
the community and no criminal record.
"There's nothing in this evidence to show she was anything but brave in the face of a
tragedy that would strike most people speechless, that might dement a person," Ruiz told
Warren.
Later she said Knoller "put her body on (Whipple) to protect her from this crazed, damned
dog."
Prosecutor James Hammer bristled at the suggestion that Knoller valiantly fought to
protect Whipple's life.
"If Marjorie Knoller's such a hero, why didn't she give first aid to Diane Whipple while
she was dying?" Hammer said. "If Marjorie Knoller's such a hero, why didn't she call 911?
And if Marjorie Knoller's such a hero, why did she go on national television and blame
Diane Whipple for her own death?"
When he again stressed Knoller's failure to help Whipple, Knoller shouted, "I did too, you
son of a bitch!" That brought a threat from the judge to remove her from court.
Much of the testimony in the hearing concerned the alleged ties the accused may have to
the Aryan Brotherhood, in part through a Pelican Bay State Prison inmate they adopted.
The judge appeared to agree with the prosecution that there was cause for concern, saying,
"The court does find that Aryan Brotherhood is a danger, that people are in danger and
that witnesses in this case are in danger. . . . The Aryan Brotherhood is potentially a
resource of some value to the defense."
He also noted prosecutors' argument on the couple's alleged flight risk. Prosecutors
pointed out that the couple drove at high speeds while being followed by police after
testifying before a grand jury that would later indict them.
That was not enough, however, for Warren to order Knoller's bail kept at $2 million.
Thomas Friedman
"John P David" <dadd...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a31ub0$qch$1...@newsreader.mailgate.org...
>
> "Marjorie Knoller" <Marjorie...@sybil.brand.org> wrote in message
> news:MPG.16bddae51...@24.2.2.74...
> >for Jesus Christ has said of the Jews,
>
> To the Rotten Witch writing this.
Marjorie Knoller in the words of her attorney is "a nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn."
----------------------------------------------
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/09/01/MN19935.DTL
> "Marjorie Knoller" <Marjorie...@sybil.brand.org> wrote in message
Ray Fischer
>Marjorie Knoller in the words of her attorney is "a nice Jewish girl from Brooklyn."
And you think that this is relevant becuase you're racist? A Nazi?
Some other formn of stupid bigot?
--
Ray Fischer When you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks
rfis...@sonic.net into you -- Nietzsche