>>=20
>> > (and on an unrelated note from reading the Tampa Bay Times "Curtis" is =
>in repeats too).
>> What amazed me about this is the copyright date.
>> King Features reprint strips ALWAYS change
>> the copyright date to the current year.
>> KFS NEVER leaves the original publication year on the
>> reprinted strips - until these (not so) current Curtis strips:
>>
http://www.thestar.com/diversions/Comics.html?feature_id=3DCurtis
>Isn't Archie basically in repeats too? Of course those examples given are b=
>y comic strips whose creators stopped drawing the strip or have died (I kno=
>w Bud Blake is no longer with us and I think both "Crock" creators are dead=
>).
>FYI, "For Better Or For Worse" also changes the year on their rerun strips =
>(with the copyright date being "2013" instead of "1984"). Same goes for occ=
>asional "Family Circus" strips (at least those that have a continuing theme=
>; usually vacation strips or the family's trip to the mall last year or the=
> recent "Daddy's sick" strips).
>Also this week's "Curtis" reruns feature Diane's current hairstyle. Some pa=
>st strips (particularly the storyline of Barry recording Curtis snoring tha=
>t ran last week) had Diane's old hairstyle.
And for more mystery, yesterday's _Herb and Jamaal_ rerun for
no obvious reason one of the handful of comic strips that got specific
enough to date really badly. The strip itself seems to dip into and
out of reruns often enough to not attract even _Herb and Jamaal_ grades
of attention, but this one ... I mean, didn't anyone at the syndicate
read the strip before including it in the pile, or have we just given
up pretending there's editors anymore?
http://www.gocomics.com/herbandjamaal/2013/05/14
Latest: How Long Is A Bad Ellipse Question?
http://wp.me/p1RYhY-s1
--------------------------------------------------------+---------------------