Mason Barge sent the following on 5/18/2012 5:53 PM:
> On Fri, 18 May 2012 13:26:20 -0500, "Jim G."<
jimg...@geemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Mason Barge sent the following on 5/16/2012 3:16 PM:
>>> On Wed, 16 May 2012 10:01:05 -0500, "Jim G."<
jimg...@geemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Johnston sent the following on 5/14/2012 2:31 PM:
>>>>> On 5/14/2012 1:09 PM, Jim G. wrote:
>>>>>> David Johnston sent the following on 5/13/2012 1:44 PM:
>>>>>>> On 5/13/2012 12:10 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pringles are awesome. At least he got one thing right. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, if you embrace the anal leakage.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That wasn't Pringles.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's just *so* not right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, it wasn't regular Pringles. It was the diet stuff. I don't
>>>>> think that sell that any more.
>>>>
>>>> Eating diet chips is like ordering a diet coke to go with your hot fudge
>>>> sundae. I suppose it's out of the question to skip them entirely and go
>>>> with carrot sticks or a banana, or something.
>>>
>>> Okay, I get the criticism of drinking a diet coke or eating fake-fat
>>> potato chips. But have you ever considered, it's pretty much the same
>>> thing as lusting after girls on a movie/tv screen?
>>
>> Lusting after girls on a screen doesn't pack on the pounds create heart
>> and joint stress,
>
> Same as diet coke and diet Pringles
My point was/is that the diet items usually don't offset the fattening
stuff. Not by a long shot. Otherwise, there wouldn't be so many fat
people drinking diet coke and eating diet Pringles.
>> or cause anal leakage.
>
> Is that worse than penile leakage?
The latter can be a good and normal thing, depending on the context. :)
>> And for my part, there are only two television objects of my lust at the
>> moment; in one case (Kensei (sp?) on NCIS:LA), the lust isn't enough to
>> get me to watch, and in the other (Odette Yustman of BREAKING IN), the
>> show has been cancelled. Sadly, I am 100% lust-object-challenged at the
>> moment, and I can't remember the last time I continued to watch a show
>> simply because it featured an attractive actress.
>
> Go for tall leggy brunettes much?
Heh. Is it that obvious? Leggy has always been almost a must since I'm
not exactly short myself, and while brunette isn't a requirement, I like
gals who tan well in the sun, which means brunettes more often than
blondes--and definitely more often than redheads. And I can't think of
any blondes (or redheads) at the moment who would go in the lust
category, but that can change at any time...