On Jan 23, 11:48 pm, "Tarq" <mitchell_cro...@caladrius.com.au> wrote:
> Also, is it just me, or has Google Groups gone silver and shiny? As far
> shiny as it could really get, being all monotone and everything, I mean.
The new interface is very ugly. I started to cry when I saw it.
==Tom
On Jan 24, 4:00 pm, "Tom Russell" <milos_par...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The new interface is very ugly.
Apparently you can do all sorts of fancy graphic things with it,
though. I just poked around, and I think you need mod privelages to
actually apply them to a group. But still, there's always that option
open to us now.
>I started to cry when I saw it.
Now would you post that on the intrawebs where everyone can see it? Now
no one will vote for you for Mayor. Pfft. Good job. =P
> ==Tom
~Mitchell
Also, the reply thing is much better for me on my horrible 28k
connection, because I don't have to load a new page each time I want to
make a reply.
>> The new interface is very ugly.
> Apparently you can do all sorts of fancy graphic things with it,
> though. I just poked around, and I think you need mod privelages to
> actually apply them to a group. But still, there's always that option
> open to us now.
Probably not open to *us*, as this is a Usenet newsgroup, not one of the
proprietary Google things.
--
Eagle (ea...@eyrie.org) Windrider of Crossroads
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> rec.arts.comics.creative moderator
On Jan 24, 4:46 pm, Eagle <e...@eyrie.org> wrote:
> Tarq <mitchell_cro...@caladrius.com.au> writes:
> > Apparently you can do all sorts of fancy graphic things with it,
> > though. I just poked around, and I think you need mod privelages to
> > actually apply them to a group. But still, there's always that option
> > open to us now.
>Probably not open to *us*, as this is a Usenet newsgroup, not one of the
> proprietary Google things.
Oh. Ah well. Hello, ugly Google Groups interface. Will you be my friend?