Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

HCC: High Concept 36.5 voting, Ridiculously Late Edition

26 views
Skip to first unread message

Tom Russell

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 10:29:27 AM6/9/13
to
If my count is correct, we had eight entries this time around:

System Corrupters #29, "Before the Fall", Rob Rogers
Powernaut 1944 #7, "Power Stars starring Stonewater Smith", Scott Eiler
Wrapped #0, "Secret Origin", Saxon Brenton
Legion of Net.Heroes vol. 2 #55, "A Minute in the New Atlantis!", Andrew Perron
The Super Wizard from Space #42, "The Secret History of the Seven Cosmic Crowns", Wil Alambre
LL & DD Special, "Empaneled", Andrew Burton
Coherent Super Stories #31, "Dichotomous Duo", Dave Van Domelen
Before Saviors of the NET: Human Aquarium, Arthur Spitzer


(Please let me know if I've missed anyone!)

Voting will end one week from today.

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/FGFLL2Z

Andrew Perron

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 9:32:53 PM6/9/13
to
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 14:29:27 +0000 (UTC), Tom Russell wrote:

> If my count is correct, we had eight entries this time around:
>
> System Corrupters #29, "Before the Fall", Rob Rogers
> Powernaut 1944 #7, "Power Stars starring Stonewater Smith", Scott Eiler
> Wrapped #0, "Secret Origin", Saxon Brenton
> Legion of Net.Heroes vol. 2 #55, "A Minute in the New Atlantis!", Andrew Perron
> The Super Wizard from Space #42, "The Secret History of the Seven Cosmic Crowns", Wil Alambre
> LL & DD Special, "Empaneled", Andrew Burton
> Coherent Super Stories #31, "Dichotomous Duo", Dave Van Domelen
> Before Saviors of the NET: Human Aquarium, Arthur Spitzer

Good haul, good haul!

Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, voteyvote

Tom Russell

unread,
Jun 16, 2013, 10:54:46 PM6/16/13
to
Well, we had a tie between Dave and Rob. And so I must cast my tie-breaker vote. Which is hard.

Both stories were quite excellent (in fact, all eight were pretty great!), each succeeding in the different way it answered the challenge. In the end, however, I'll break the tie in Rob's favor.

I wanted to take a moment to thank everyone who participated. The best I was hoping for with 36.5 was to prevent 36 from being fatal. I was pleasantly surprised and deeply gratified that 36.5 garnered so many responses, and that all of them were excellent.

Now, take it away, Rob...!

Wil Alambre

unread,
Jun 16, 2013, 11:37:36 PM6/16/13
to
Congratulations, Rob! Looking forward to discovering what our next challenge will be :)
Wil Alambre
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Follow me at http://twitter.com/wilalambre

Andrew Perron

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 3:19:22 AM6/17/13
to
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:54:46 +0000 (UTC), Tom Russell wrote:

> Both stories were quite excellent (in fact, all eight were pretty great!),
> each succeeding in the different way it answered the challenge. In the end,
> however, I'll break the tie in Rob's favor.

Wooooo! <3

> I wanted to take a moment to thank everyone who participated. The best I
> was hoping for with 36.5 was to prevent 36 from being fatal. I was
> pleasantly surprised and deeply gratified that 36.5 garnered so many
> responses, and that all of them were excellent.

I think this is a lesson: Challenges to do something *short* are more
likely to get a response.

Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, constrained writing.

Scott Eiler

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 8:57:09 PM6/17/13
to
On 6/16/2013 7:54 PM, Tom Russell wrote:
> Well, we had a tie between Dave and Rob. And so I must cast my
> tie-breaker vote. Which is hard.
>
> Both stories were quite excellent (in fact, all eight were pretty
> great!), each succeeding in the different way it answered the
> challenge. In the end, however, I'll break the tie in Rob's favor.

Yeah. This contest was so hard to vote in, I don't even remember which
story I voted for.

--
(signed) Scott Eiler 8{D> -------- http://www.eilertech.com/ ---------

When you *are* the leader... whatever goes wrong... whether you did it
or not... *you* are held responsible. - Barack Obama

I know. - Archie Andrews

- from Archie #617, March 2011, scripted by Alex Simmons.

EDMLite

unread,
Jun 22, 2013, 12:29:14 AM6/22/13
to
On Sunday, June 16, 2013 7:54:46 PM UTC-7, Tom Russell wrote:
> Both stories were quite excellent (in fact, all eight were pretty great!), each succeeding in the different way it answered the challenge. In the end, however, I'll break the tie in Rob's favor.

Hey, wow! Thank you very much!

I thought this was one of the best collection of contest
entries we've had in quite a while -- so this was really
an honor.

And now for the next challenge. In the spirit of
RACC, I'm calling for... a Team Challenge!

That's right -- you MUST collaborate with another
writer or artist in some way, shape or form to
qualify for this entry.

How you collaborate is up to you. Spitballing
ideas with another writer? Working with an artist
to illustrate your ideas? Bodily merging with
other creative types into an all-powerful gestalt
being? Hey, whatever works!

The deadline is Bastille Day -- Sunday, July 14.

As someone once said... come together. Right
now. Over me.

--Rob Rogers
--Groovin' up slowly

Andrew Perron

unread,
Jun 22, 2013, 12:54:59 AM6/22/13
to
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 04:29:14 +0000 (UTC), EDMLite wrote:

<snip>
> And now for the next challenge. In the spirit of
> RACC, I'm calling for... a Team Challenge!
>
> That's right -- you MUST collaborate with another
> writer or artist in some way, shape or form to
> qualify for this entry.
>
> How you collaborate is up to you. Spitballing
> ideas with another writer? Working with an artist
> to illustrate your ideas? Bodily merging with
> other creative types into an all-powerful gestalt
> being? Hey, whatever works!

Hm.

...hmmmmm!

Question: Can you have more than one entry on this if you're collaborating
with different people?

Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, I have a couple of ideas.

Scott Eiler

unread,
Jun 22, 2013, 2:48:24 AM6/22/13
to
On 6/21/2013 9:29 PM, EDMLite wrote:

> And now for the next challenge. In the spirit of
> RACC, I'm calling for... a Team Challenge!
>
> That's right -- you MUST collaborate with another
> writer or artist in some way, shape or form to
> qualify for this entry.

I love the concept, and I'm in a good position to do something about it
right now, but... err, historically, collaborations in RACC do not lend
themselves to *any* sort of deadline.

Still, I'll try...

Tom Russell

unread,
Jun 22, 2013, 6:19:51 PM6/22/13
to
I've found a buddy for my own entry.

If however anyone else is looking to buddy-up, I'd be happy to volunteer what services I have at my disposal, with the caveat that if the story I assist you with wins, you choose the next concept. Shoot me an email if interested.

==Tom

Scott Eiler

unread,
Jun 22, 2013, 8:47:28 PM6/22/13
to
Likewise I've found a collaborator. If I've sent you a proposal, I'll
still follow through, but please know I won't be offended or handicapped
if you decline.

I'm kind of interested in how we choose the next concept after this.
Who remembers "When the hardwired aliens come, a man and his chocolate
react by swimming"?

Andrew Perron

unread,
Jun 22, 2013, 11:44:57 PM6/22/13
to
I'll say right now, I'm willing to collaborate with anyone who wants to.
`.`v Almost certainly going to have multiple entries in this.

Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, bwahaha

Scott Eiler

unread,
Jun 23, 2013, 8:02:50 PM6/23/13
to
On 6/21/2013 9:54 PM, Andrew Perron wrote:

> Question: Can you have more than one entry on this if you're collaborating
> with different people?
>
> Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, I have a couple of ideas.

I'm confident you've figured out an answer. But since no one's spoken
up yet, I'll point out: I've been a multiple entrant in one or two
contests already. People looked at me funny for competing against
myself, but the precedent is set.
0 new messages