For those who might wonder, the snow did no damage.
Reiner Goebel Support the IBC with your donation.
Toronto, Canada Email me for details.
http://www.tbs.game2.com
********************************************************************************
+++++This list is supported, in part, by a contribution from Jim Harwood+++++
>>-->> The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://users.nbn.net/~herrfam/index.html <<--<<
To leave the list, send SIGNOFF BONSAI to: LIST...@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Anton Nijhuis
Vancouver Island
What it went to say is if you were to hire a landscape designer to design
your home landscape and you paid them for it. This does not give you the
right to reproduce the design in another landscape. An example would be a
neighbour or a relative. This would apply if you purchased a specially
designed tree, you would not be allowed to duplicate the design on another
tree?
I was wondering how this would apply to the designs themselves on displayed
pictures never mind duplicating pictures.
>> I was wondering how this would apply to the designs themselves on
displayed
>> pictures never mind duplicating pictures.
Anton,
I have argued long into the night on ths one, with photograhers who
specialise in photographing bonsai. They are of the opinion that the entire
photograph is their copyright regardless and irrespective of who
owns/created the subject. Mine is that the copyright of the photograph may
belong to them, but the copyright to the image, or subject, rest with the
current owner. I argue that thee are tens of thousands of photographers in
the UK who can take equally as good pictures, but only one person in the
universe who could have created that particular image - without which there
would be no photograph.
Banging my head against a brick wall!
I even paid a copyright lawyer to give learned opinion - which was that
although I was probably right, persuing the matter in the courts would be a
rich man's pastime.
Since then, If any professional photographer shoots any of my trees, it is
at my request and paid for by me. I also insist that all
negatives/transparencies - even rejects - are delivered to me.
Naturally I credit the photographer whenever pictures are published - which
is a far greater courtesy than has been extended to me as creator of the
trees in the past.
Must go and rinse this taste of sour grapes out of my mouth... ;)
Colin
Email: colinlew...@btinternet.com
Website: http://www.btinternet.com/~colinlewis.bonsai
David Bockman, Fairfax, Virginia. (USDA Zone 7)
Bunabayashi Bonsai on The Web: http://www.bunabayashi.com
email: d...@bunabayashi.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anton Nijhuis" <ibo...@OBERON.ARK.COM>
To: <BON...@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sent: Thu, Dec 23, 99 3:48 PM
Subject: Copyrights of intellectual material
> I just came across something interesting in a newsletter that states
> "possession of intellectual property does not convey rights to reproduce
> it".
>
> What it went to say is if you were to hire a landscape designer to design
> your home landscape and you paid them for it. This does not give you the
> right to reproduce the design in another landscape. An example would be a
> neighbour or a relative. This would apply if you purchased a specially
> designed tree, you would not be allowed to duplicate the design on another
> tree?
>
> I was wondering how this would apply to the designs themselves on
displayed
> pictures never mind duplicating pictures.
********************************************************************************
Carl L. Rosner - near Atlantic City zone 6/7
http://www.artxpo.com/clrosner
http://arnierosner.com/Merchant/merchant.mv
Anton Nijhuis wrote:
> I just came across something interesting in a newsletter that states
> "possession of intellectual property does not convey rights to reproduce
> it".
>
> What it went to say is if you were to hire a landscape designer to design
> your home landscape and you paid them for it. This does not give you the
> right to reproduce the design in another landscape. An example would be a
> neighbour or a relative. This would apply if you purchased a specially
> designed tree, you would not be allowed to duplicate the design on another
> tree?
>
> I was wondering how this would apply to the designs themselves on displayed
> pictures never mind duplicating pictures.
>
> Anton Nijhuis
> Vancouver Island
I have addressed this issue and won the argument. If you hire a photographer
to take the pictures you own the rights to them. He was in your employ at
the time and therefore worked under your direction. All rights to the images
belong to you.
If however you allow a photographer to take pictures then you must state in
advance all restrictions imposed on him. Failure to do so gives him the
right to use the images as he see fit.
Ron
Best of the season to all.
Anton Nijhuis
Vancouver Island - 8 Celcius no frost for over a month warmer than Hong Kong
Ray S.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
I've just dug out and re-read the report I had from a copyright lawyer here
in the UK.
It seems that if a magazine or book publisher prints an unauthorised
photograph of one of your (my) trees, you have NO redress in regard to
copyright of the design of the tree - simply because the publisher has
reproduced the photograph, NOT the design of the tree. You can only claim
for infringement of copyright of the photograph - if, indeed you own that
copyright. If the photograph was taken by a third party, even without your
consent, you are helpless.
On the other hand, if someone copies your design - as has been done many
times with, for example, John Naka's "Goshin" - then you may take legal
action.
I must say that I do get somewhat rattled when photographers make fair sums
of money, by just clicking the button, out of the decades of dedication and
expertise that I have put into creating the image they wish to photograph
and sell.
The only way you can protect the copyright of your bonsai design as far as
printed (and internet) media is concerned is to ensure that whenever and
wherever they are exhibited there are prominent notices declaring that the
trees are covered by copyright and that photography is not permitted. If a
photograph then appears in print you may take action against the hotographer
but not the publication.
If ever you permit or commission photography, always get the photographer to
sign a declaration that the photographs will not be shown, hired, lent or
sold without your prior permission and payment to you of an appropriate fee.
Happy Christmas to you all.
Colin
Email: colinlew...@btinternet.com
Website: http://www.btinternet.com/~colinlewis.bonsai
********************************************************************************
Marty Haber
Zone 6A (I think)
<< Remember that each of us is only a tenant on this planet. Not only do
we have temporary custody of our ideas and photographs, but also of our
trees. >>
Alas:
. . .a fresh perspective on bonsai custody.
Cordially,
Michael Persiano
members.aol.com/iasnob/index.html