first tat questions
Sk8erplayer1
wrestling. im gonna bulk back up like no more then 20 lbs but will that make a
showing diferince in the tat like stretching it out or anything. Also if any
one knows a good place to get tribal type tats in central cali by modesto or
sacromento please tell me thnx for ur help.
Curt
>i finaly talked my dad into getting me a tat but ive been droppin weight for
>wrestling. im gonna bulk back up like no more then 20 lbs but will that make a
I wrestled 155 about a million years ago. Sucking weight, well, sucks.
Speaking of sucking weight, someone may be along shortly to criticize
you for using the word tat. Tell them to fuck off, would you? And to
answer your question: No, dropping weight will not ruin your tattoo.
Best of luck.
--
Curt
http://iam.bmezine.com/?curt
http://www.curtjames.com/
Eric S.
news:pkqj3v8fkiou48jl2...@4ax.com...
> I wrestled 155 about a million years ago. Sucking weight, well, sucks.
Hrmm...You rolling around sweating on the mat with another guy. Why am
I not surprised?
> Speaking of sucking weight, someone may be along shortly to criticize
> you for using the word tat. Tell them to fuck off, would you?
God, will you stop sucking the cocks of every new person who posts here?
Damn it's annoying. You'd have been better off to get the regulars to like
you instead of feeling the need to befriend every idiot who shows up to
overcompensate.
-- Eric S.
fr0glet
> "Curt" <curt_...@yahoo.com> wrote...
> > I wrestled 155 about a million years ago. Sucking weight, well, sucks.
>
> Hrmm...You rolling around sweating on the mat with another guy. Why
am
> I not surprised?
Because it's SO MUCH FUN?
> > Speaking of sucking weight, someone may be along shortly to criticize
> > you for using the word tat. Tell them to fuck off, would you?
>
> God, will you stop sucking the cocks of every new person who posts
here?
> Damn it's annoying. You'd have been better off to get the regulars to
like
> you
SUPRISE!!! There's a whole collection of regular posters who DO like Curt.
We just don't all feel the need to leap up to comment on it, unlike some
others who dislike.
Negativity is the source of discontent. Jeeze, lighten up.
fr0glet (card-carrying member of the Happy Shiny RABbits Club)
Eric S.
news:v3kdnjr...@corp.supernews.com...
> SUPRISE!!! There's a whole collection of regular posters who DO like Curt.
You have my condolences.
> Negativity is the source of discontent.
Negativity? Do you consider a response to a post telling the OP to tell
anyone who says anything about using the word 'tat' to 'fuck off' as a
positive one? I don't...I actually see it as a trollish way to bait a few
of the people who get annoyed by it into ANOTHER arguement. Personally, I
don't care if someone uses the word 'tat'. I do get annoyed when Curt
sticks his nose far up someones ass in a post and I do get annoyed when I
perceive him playing mini-troll. His post could have easily stated that no,
gaining or losing 20 pounds shouldn't affect the tattoo. The other crap he
put in there was to make himself look better and to annoy others.
-- Eric S. (doesn't carry any cards)
Keith Alexander
> i finaly talked my dad into getting me a tat
*** Some people, people who really enjoy and feel a deeper connection
for tattoos, believe the word "tat" cheapens and demeans what is an ancient
and powerful art and practice. You should consider this.
You will gain much more respect and be treated better by those
people who _can_ actually help you, if you call tattoos "tattoos."
In the same way, please don't call tattooing machines "tat guns."
You understand me, don't you?
Imagine going to Ed Hardy and saying "I want a dragon tat?"
That wouldn't really work with someone of his caliber.
If you use the full word, not the street slang, you
stand a much better chance of being heard. At least by world-class
artisans and enthusiasts.
I'd suggest reading International Tattoo Art, as opposed to
Extreme Bod Mod.
People judge you on the words you use. To say nothing of the
art you wear. Avoid cartoon tattoos.
KA
Susan
"Keith Alexander" <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote in message
news:8a50fc24.03013...@posting.google.com...
> I'd suggest reading International Tattoo Art, as opposed to
> Extreme Bod Mod.
I love Chris Pfouts.
ITA is the best.
Susan
micheLLe
> "fr0glet" <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote in message
> news:v3kdnjr...@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>SUPRISE!!! There's a whole collection of regular posters who DO like Curt.
>
>
> You have my condolences.
>
Asshat.
Michelle (who would like to jump on fr0glet's bandwagon and say I LIKE
CURT!)
scott bock
if you're a boy, don't do it around your belly button. remember,
this tattoo is permanent, the wrestling tournament isn't.
anyway, go to american graffiti. they may even be able to impress
onto you, other styles other than tribal. they rock though.
Barry
"Sk8erplayer1" wrote:
> one knows a good place to get tribal type tats in central cali by modesto or
> sacromento please tell me thnx for ur help.
In Modesto I would contact Rob at Mystical Body. Its a piercing only place,
but I trust his judgment on where he would go to get a tattoo.
In Sacramento go to American Graffiti.
Barry.
www.anatometal.com
Michael D. Hofer
Okay, who are you and what have you done with Keith? Or did you just
forget and took the BLUE pill by mistake this morning?
Actually, an excellent piece of text. May I quote it, properly
attributed, as something to pass on to younger folks to "wean" them
from street attitudes?
m
--
an ancient pond
a frog jumps in
the sound of water
http://www.ancientpond.com/
fr0glet
> "fr0glet" <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote...
> > SUPRISE!!! There's a whole collection of regular posters who DO like
Curt.
>
>
> Negativity? Do you consider a response to a post telling the OP to
tell
> anyone who says anything about using the word 'tat' to 'fuck off' as a
> positive one?
No, I don't. Hence the discontent.
> I don't...I actually see it as a trollish way to bait a few
> of the people who get annoyed by it into ANOTHER arguement.
Like the one you started?
> Personally, I
> don't care if someone uses the word 'tat'. I do get annoyed when Curt
> sticks his nose far up someones ass in a post and I do get annoyed when I
> perceive him playing mini-troll.
So killfile him.
> The other crap he
> put in there was to make himself look better and to annoy others.
Why do you care how anyone looks in anyone else's eyes? What fucking
difference does THAT make?
fr0glet
Keith Alexander
> fr0glet (card-carrying member of the Happy Shiny RABbits Club)
*** Do you take any kind of meds?
KA
Keith Alexander®
wrote:
> Also if any one knows a good place to get tribal
*** WHICH TRIBE?
DAMN YOU JONATHAN SHAW! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
--
k e i t h . a l e x a n d e r
http://www.nootrope.net
http://www.modernamerican.com
aim: nootrope9
-- e n d . t r a n s m i s s i o n --
Keith Alexander®
wrote:
>im gonna bulk back up like no more then 20 lbs but will that make a
>showing diferince in the tat like stretching it out or anything.
*** Actually, despite the advice you may have garnered from
the less educated and experienced quarters of RAB, weight
loss _can_ cause your tattoo to lose the original shape.
Obviously, if you get some lame-assed, black-magic
marker-looking, wannabe tribal (note lowercase), it
wouldn't matter.
It the tattoo had no shape to begin with, 20 pounds
won't change a thing.
If, however, you have some detailed Maori-styled geometric
laid on by a master like Alex Binnie, yes, a weight loss
of 20 pounds will mess with the layout and design.
I get the feeling you'll be getting that 75 dollar
piece right offa sheet #383.
Prove me wrong, I'll be very happy.
jaalyn
>
> People judge you on the words you use. To say nothing of the
> art you wear. Avoid cartoon tattoos.
>
consider doing a Taz brand if someone asked, just for camp value?
-jaalyn
Eric S.
news:3E3AAF78...@yahoo.com...
> > You have my condolences.
>
> Asshat.
I'd throw some kind of insult back...But the whole "I like Curt TOO"
thing does way more to you than anything I can say. :)
-- Eric S.
Eric S.
> > I don't...I actually see it as a trollish way to bait a few
> > of the people who get annoyed by it into ANOTHER arguement.
>
> Like the one you started?
Hey, my arguments die pretty quickly...Unlike SOME peoples. :P
> So killfile him.
Nah, I don't killfile anyone.
> > The other crap he
> > put in there was to make himself look better and to annoy others.
>
> Why do you care how anyone looks in anyone else's eyes? What fucking
> difference does THAT make?
It doesn't...I was just stating an opinion. It bothers me that he
intentionally tries to annoy others, not how he looks in anyone else's eyes.
-- Eric S.
fr0glet
> "fr0glet" <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote...
>
> > fr0glet (card-carrying member of the Happy Shiny RABbits Club)
>
> *** Do you take any kind of meds?
Not ANY. I'm picky.
fr0glet
fr0glet
>
> It doesn't...I was just stating an opinion. It bothers me that he
> intentionally tries to annoy others, not how he looks in anyone else's
eyes.
Did you happen to notice the result it got? The most civilized and eloquent
description of why KA doesn't like the word 'tat' that I have ever seen him
post. Granted, I've only been reading RAB for a year.
fr0glet
Eric S.
> Did you happen to notice the result it got? The most civilized and
eloquent
> description of why KA doesn't like the word 'tat' that I have ever seen
him
> post. Granted, I've only been reading RAB for a year.
I'd venture to guess the response Keith gave had nothing to do with
Curt's comments.
-- Eric S.
intergalactic snitty princess
wrote:
>It doesn't...I was just stating an opinion. It bothers me that he
>intentionally tries to annoy others, not how he looks in anyone else's eyes.
Yeah, because Curt's the only person on RAB who intentionally tries to
annoy others.
I'm sure glad we got that out of the way.
~christyn.
***yank me to reply***
Keith Alexander®
<feathe...@ancientpond.com> wrote:
>Actually, an excellent piece of text. May I quote it, properly
>attributed, as something to pass on to younger folks to "wean" them
>from street attitudes?
*** Whatever.
Eric S.
> Yeah, because Curt's the only person on RAB who intentionally tries to
> annoy others.
>
> I'm sure glad we got that out of the way.
Me too. Thanks for stating it :)
-- Eric S.
Keith Alexander®
<fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
>Did you happen to notice the result it got? The most civilized and eloquent
>description of why KA doesn't like the word 'tat' that I have ever seen him
>post.
*** I prefer saying:
"Tat? That's a word lowlife, uneducated, trendy
jerk-offs use. Now stop humping your sister for
a minute and get me a fucking beer."
>Granted, I've only been reading RAB for a year.
*** I've plenty of civilized and eloquent posts in my 9 years here.
fr0glet
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:46:26 -0800, "fr0glet"
> <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
>
> >Did you happen to notice the result it got? The most civilized and
eloquent
> >description of why KA doesn't like the word 'tat' that I have ever seen
him
> >post.
>
> *** I prefer saying:
> "Tat? That's a word lowlife, uneducated, trendy
> jerk-offs use. Now stop humping your sister for
> a minute and get me a fucking beer."
I'm familiar with that reply, and many variations thereof.
> *** I've plenty of civilized and eloquent posts in my 9 years here.
Your overall civility and eloquence are not in question; I've read quite a
few of those posts. I've never seen one so tactful on the subject of "tat"
before this. Why did you change your tune, if not for contrariness?
fr0glet
The Queen of Cans and Jars
> Why did you change your tune, if not for contrariness?
as if there were a better reason!
Keith Alexander®
<fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
> Why did you change your tune, if not for contrariness?
*** I don't have a "tune" and resent your attempts
to define me.
Funny too, that stupid fucking punk didn't even
deserve the reply, as it turns out.
!
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:46:26 -0800, "fr0glet"
> <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
>
>>Did you happen to notice the result it got? The most civilized and eloquent
>>description of why KA doesn't like the word 'tat' that I have ever seen him
>>post.
>
> *** I prefer saying:
> "Tat? That's a word lowlife, uneducated, trendy
> jerk-offs use. Now stop humping your sister for
> a minute and get me a fucking beer."
>
>>Granted, I've only been reading RAB for a year.
>
> *** I've plenty of civilized and eloquent posts in my 9 years here.
>
>
Nine?
Date: 1996/06/10
You were here just under two months before me. :P
Cora
Keith Alexander®
>Date: 1996/06/10
*** My first post here was from a computer at Gauntlet NY
in 1993.
!
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 01:27:21 GMT, co...@cooties.corabug.net (!) wrote:
>
>>Date: 1996/06/10
>
> *** My first post here was from a computer at Gauntlet NY
> in 1993.
>
I dont care what you say. I still wanna rock.
Cora
fr0glet
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 12:30:04 -0800, "fr0glet"
> <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
>
> > Why did you change your tune, if not for contrariness?
>
> *** I don't have a "tune" and resent your attempts
> to define me.
Let me rephrase and call it your average modus operandi. You define
yourself.
> Funny too, that stupid fucking punk didn't even
> deserve the reply, as it turns out.
Rest assured that lots of other RABbits do deserve it, and now we have it
forever archived to quote at our leisure. Thank you, Your Eloquence.
fr0glet
Keith Alexander®
<fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
>Rest assured that lots of other RABbits do deserve it, and now we have it
>forever archived to quote at our leisure.
*** All you had to do was ask. :-)
>Thank you, Your Eloquence.
*** No fucking problem, dude.
LadyJ
AlexanderŽ) wrote:
>On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 01:27:21 GMT, co...@cooties.corabug.net (!) wrote:
>
>>Date: 1996/06/10
>
>*** My first post here was from a computer at Gauntlet NY
>in 1993.
That reminds me. I don't think I got a chance to tell you guys. My bf
and his partner were looking for a name for their gaming shop. I
suggested "Gauntlet Games", and that is what they chose. :)
Jess
i'll teach you to turn away.
L> My bf and his partner
your partner's partner was also your partner!
http://www.attrition.org/hosted/sexchart
:D :D
lish "waiting aroused with that sneering smile,
cr...@got.net he's a cynical spirit." -cw
38.5% / 30 RANA 125 / 68
Sk8erplayer1
big idea and im sorry for any inconvinance. yes i am only 16 and i know most
of u are thinkin lil punk kid who jsut wants to look cool but i have been
checking and reasearching for a while and have a real good idea of what i want.
thank those of u who helped with info and those of u who i sparked arguments i
repeat again i am truely sorry if any one can give me "profesional" advice and
help me be more informed i would be greatfull.
Barry
"Sk8erplayer1" wrote:
> help me be more informed i would be greatfull.
Its against the law to tattoo anyone under the age of 18
in California, so if you are looking to have a great
tattoo done you will have to wait. I am sure if you look
hard enough you will find someone thats a "practicing
tat artist that does some mean fine-line", but if you want
that great tattoo.... two more years to think about what
you want.
Barry.
www.anatometal.com
Sk8erplayer1
thanks for infoming me
Curt
fr0glet <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote<snip>:
>> Did you happen to notice the result it got?
>> The most civilized and eloquent description of
>> why KA doesn't like the word 'tat' that I have ever seen
>> him post.
>
>gave had nothing to do with Curt's comments.
Eric, you were wrong about barcode tattoos and I imagine
you're wrong here as well.
Regardless, Keith's reply (elsewhere in ng r.a.b) was wonderful.
--
Curt
http://iam.bmezine.com/?curt
http://www.curtjames.com/
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
Eric S.
news:228a843c8f266f62fa3...@mygate.mailgate.org...
> Eric, you were wrong about barcode tattoos and I imagine
> you're wrong here as well.
1. You're an ass.
2. I still have yet to hear of anyone who actually has SEEN a barcode
tattoo scan...Lots of 'My friend...blah blah blah.'
3. You're an ass.
-- Eric S.
!
Ive scanned three actual barcode tattoos successfully with a lateral sweep
scanner. Two of them were on the same person. I went into detail about
it working sometimes in three posts in the last two months. Apparently
you werent paying attention.
Barcodes do not have to be LITTLE to be scannable. UPC for example
is not ACTUAL, its RELATIVE.
Cora
Eric S.
news:Muk0a.2648$SD6.33@sccrnsc03...
> Ive scanned three actual barcode tattoos successfully with a lateral sweep
> scanner. Two of them were on the same person. I went into detail about
> it working sometimes in three posts in the last two months. Apparently
> you werent paying attention.
>
> Barcodes do not have to be LITTLE to be scannable. UPC for example
> is not ACTUAL, its RELATIVE.
You've still yet to disprove point 1 and 3 of my post. :)
-- Eric S.
jaalyn
>
> 1. You're an ass.
> 2. I still have yet to hear of anyone who actually has SEEN a barcode
> tattoo scan...Lots of 'My friend...blah blah blah.'
> 3. You're an ass.
>
http://216.17.62.101/cgi-bin/glossary.exe?search=barcode
when this whole barcode thing started?
-jaalyn
!
Thats fine. Also, enumeration of fault is one of mine. Respect your elders.
Cora
Chris Liberti
think you want and wait a couple of years to make sure you still want it. I
am 27 now and some of the designs I wanted when I was 16 I know I would
regret now. I am glad I waited until I was 21 before I got my 1st tat and I
don't regret any of the ones I have. Also if you want tribal and are
interested in celtic work one of the best artists for celtic in the world is
in Santa Barbara. I know it is a ways away from Modesto but since it will
be something you will have the rest of your life you might as well go to the
best.
"Sk8erplayer1" <sk8erp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030204235411...@mb-mh.aol.com...