Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

don't you miss her!@?#?!

7 views
Skip to first unread message

i'll teach you to turn away.

unread,
Nov 1, 2002, 8:13:30 AM11/1/02
to
especially for yttrx.

http://pages.cthome.net/rebekah/random/newbra.jpg
http://pages.cthome.net/rebekah/random/back1.jpg
http://pages.cthome.net/rebekah/random/hooters2.jpg

lish "how sad it is for other people
cr...@got.net that they cannot appreciate our genius." -hc
37.9% / 30 RANA 125 / 68

.

unread,
Nov 1, 2002, 10:40:20 AM11/1/02
to

No, no I dont.

Not even a little itty bitty fucking bit.

I miss geoff tremendously though. Any pics of him lying around?

8D


-----.

Snorre Selmer

unread,
Nov 1, 2002, 1:12:49 PM11/1/02
to
Like Jesus said to the South Park gang when asked about homosexuality: "I
wouldn't touch that with a 40-foot pole."


i'll teach you to turn away.

unread,
Nov 1, 2002, 1:29:17 PM11/1/02
to
. <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
.> I miss geoff tremendously though. Any pics of him lying around?
.> 8D

several really good ones, actually. i'm sure he'd send them to you
if you asked nicely. :D

lish "i see someone didn't take his
cr...@got.net SHUT THE FUCK UP pill today." -tf

i'll teach you to turn away.

unread,
Nov 1, 2002, 1:30:58 PM11/1/02
to
Snorre Selmer <snorselmn...@online.no> wrote:
SS> Like Jesus said to the South Park gang when asked about homosexuality: "I
SS> wouldn't touch that with a 40-foot pole."

& those are touched-up photos, at that. apparently she cropped out
her "empty skin" from her recent fat person surgery (gastro bypass).
bleeech.

lish "she's so mean
cr...@got.net & it means a lot to me." -jc

i'll teach you to turn away.

unread,
Nov 1, 2002, 5:54:32 PM11/1/02
to
David RL Gartner <sticknee...@mindspring.com> wrote:
DRG> On 1 Nov 2002 13:13:30 GMT, i'll teach you to turn away.
> especially for yttrx.
DRG> i think it's more for you, actually.
DRG> you're obsessed with Rebekah. why?

it's not an obsession. i know the difference.

that said, i do occasionally go out of my way (ie scripts, posts
such as this) to poke fun at her. why? because i enjoy taunting others, &
i enjoy being taunted in return. she doesn't fulfill this latter bit so
much, but damn, i have trouble resisting when she writes shit like this:

"* HOW ARE THE "WICKED" TREATED IN THE AFTERLIFE?
i hope they're punished. however, it feels like i'm being
punished in THIS life, and multiple psychics (in different parts
of the country, unrelated) have told me that i was a healer or a
shaman in past lives. so why am i being punished NOW?"

"this year, i think i'm going to organize my bookmarks before
crying myself to sleep."

remember that everything i do on rab is done for my own personal
amusement. a little effort, to that end, is required. i don't believe i've
spent more time on bekkkah than any other repeating target.

lish "let's play a game. it's called 'spot
cr...@got.net the jerk'. ready? i spot you!" -db

.

unread,
Nov 1, 2002, 6:25:16 PM11/1/02
to
i'll teach you to turn away. <cr...@got.net> wrote:
> . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> .> I miss geoff tremendously though. Any pics of him lying around?
> .> 8D
>
> several really good ones, actually. i'm sure he'd send them to you
> if you asked nicely. :D
>

Goddamnit. Everything I want always costs too much.


-----.


Curt

unread,
Nov 1, 2002, 10:07:59 PM11/1/02
to
i'll teach you to turn away. <cr...@got.net> wrote:

re: Rebekah

[snip]


> & those are touched-up photos, at that. apparently she cropped out
>her "empty skin" from her recent fat person surgery (gastro bypass).
>bleeech.

ATTENTION LISH: You're still a reeeeal assmunch. Pity there's no
surgery for what you're suffering from.

--
Curt
http://iam.bmezine.com/?curt
http://www.curtjames.com/

nina stoessinger

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 5:51:39 PM11/2/02
to
"." <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote in message:

>
> No, no I dont.
>
> Not even a little itty bitty fucking bit.
>
> I miss geoff tremendously though. Any pics of him lying around?

i missed you guys.

:)


nina


pin...@eskimo.cavegirl.org

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 6:16:21 PM11/2/02
to
In article <lhf6su891pumpo9jt...@4ax.com>, Curt wrote:
> i'll teach you to turn away. <cr...@got.net> wrote:
>
> re: Rebekah
>
> [snip]
>> & those are touched-up photos, at that. apparently she cropped out
>>her "empty skin" from her recent fat person surgery (gastro bypass).
>>bleeech.
>
> ATTENTION LISH: You're still a reeeeal assmunch. Pity there's no
> surgery for what you're suffering from.
>

Yo Curt, Rebekah deserves everything she gets. You didn't have to read
her wannabe mommy drivel. Wait... hmmm.

pinkee
--
http://www.cavegirl.org
"And on this journey may the good Lord guide us
And may the goddess dance beside us"
Sinead O'Connor

wrath

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 6:43:59 PM11/2/02
to
pin...@eskimo.cavegirl.org wrote:

> Rebekah deserves everything she gets.


Do explain to me the point of doing this to someone who's not even here.

*paints a target on his ass*

In my opinion this is both wrong *AND* stupid. If you're gonna flame
someone, flame someone who's actually subscribed to the newsgroup. I
find it incredibly pathetic that anyone would hold such a grudge that
you'd go and actually look up someone who you don't like and then flame
them in a place that they'll never even know about it! At least have the
stones to e-mail her.

But, of course, standing up for someone makes me a target, doesn't it?
Oh well, so be it. Better being a target than another asshole flaming
someone behind their back.

wrath

Corine Bohan

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 7:06:56 PM11/2/02
to
"nina stoessinger" <alta...@yahoo.de> wrote in message
news:aq1lt6$5p9vm$1...@ID-16872.news.dfncis.de...

> i missed you guys.
>
> :)

*Hey Nina2, how's life in the US?!
Glad to see you are still lurking!
Do you miss swizterland?

Corine
--
A man generally has two reasons for doing a thing. One that sounds good, and
a real one. J.Pierpoint Morgan

fr0glet

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 7:23:30 PM11/2/02
to
"wrath" <wr...@NOSPAM.webscure.net> wrote...

> *paints a target on his ass*

2 this week! What do I win?

fr0glet


The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 7:45:12 PM11/2/02
to
wrath <wr...@NOSPAM.webscure.net> wrote:

> Do explain to me the point of doing this to someone who's not even here.

it's funny.

hth, hand, m.

--
Queenie
mhm27x16
she has carrot top's autograph tattooed on her arm
and that alone tells me that she deserves everything she gets

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 7:48:17 PM11/2/02
to
On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 23:43:59 GMT, wrath <wr...@NOSPAM.webscure.net>
belched:

>But, of course, standing up for someone makes me a target, doesn't it?

*** First, she's subscribed.

Second, she's a pussy who blocks incoming
mail and page views.

Third, you're too new here to have a grasp of
the history and the hilarity of it all.

Fourth, don't flatter yourself as a hero.

Last, you need a haircut.

--
k e i t h . a l e x a n d e r
http://www.nootrope.net
http://www.modernamerican.com
aim: nootrope9

-- e n d . t r a n s m i s s i o n --

.|..

.

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 7:51:49 PM11/2/02
to

Why are you even here?


-----.


.

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 7:52:38 PM11/2/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> wrath <wr...@NOSPAM.webscure.net> wrote:
>
>> Do explain to me the point of doing this to someone who's not even here.
>
> it's funny.
>

Hi, I dont remember ever talking to you before.

R U KYOOT?


-----.

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 8:01:13 PM11/2/02
to
On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:51:49 GMT, yt...@mutilation.net (.) belched:

> If you're gonna flame someone, flame someone who's
> actually subscribed to the newsgroup.

*** BTW, that wasn't a flame.

Funny, innit?

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 8:33:04 PM11/2/02
to

hell yes.

--
Queenie
mhm27x16
self-obsessed and sexy
all the way

.

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 8:46:18 PM11/2/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> > wrath <wr...@NOSPAM.webscure.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Do explain to me the point of doing this to someone who's not even here.
>> >
>> > it's funny.
>> >
>>
>> Hi, I dont remember ever talking to you before.
>>
>> R U KYOOT?
>
> hell yes.
>

Rock. Over 18?

You need to be over 18 to do it with me. Over 26 for meaningful
conversation.


-----.

wrath

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 8:50:31 PM11/2/02
to
. wrote:

>
> Why are you even here?


One potential answer to that might be because I was under the
(incorrect) impression that because you knew what you were talking about
on your FAQ, you and the others here might actually be worth my time. My
initial impression is that I was quite wrong, but I'm going to give it
time anyway. After all, I've got plenty of it, and nobody here really
has the ability to upset me because, when all is said and done, you're
just a bunch of faceless people on the other side of a magic box.
Considering some fairly useful information gets posted here on a
relatively regular basis which will therefore allow me to learn more
about things I'd like to learn about, I stay. I'd say I hope that answer
satisfies you, but the truth is I really don't care. (You mean newbies
can dislike members of the list too? No way!)

fr0glet wrote:
> 2 this week! What do I win?

3 this week now! You win...permission to doodle on my right ear, since
you seemed to actually want that.

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> it's funny.

No, no its really not.

Keith Alexander wrote:
> *** First, she's subscribed.

Not last I heard but, if I'm wrong, I stand corrected.

Keith Alexander also wrote:
> Second, she's a pussy who blocks incoming
> mail and page views.

I would too coming from you. Why would you not block someone you didn't
like?

Keith Alexander continued by writing:


> Third, you're too new here to have a grasp of
> the history and the hilarity of it all.

Not the history of it, no, but the hilarity of it I need no time to
grasp because there is none. There's no humor in this. Its really just
mindless and stupid and only entertains you because you've all decided
you don't like her and seem to get off on being a jerk. To each their
own, I suppose, but there's no need for it...nor is it amusing.

Keith Alexander just couldn't shut up and also wrote:
> Fourth, don't flatter yourself as a hero.

I don't. You honestly think I believe what I say will make a difference
here that I could possibly be under the delusion that I'm a hero? You're
crazier than I am. And to be a hero in this case would mean I'd be
coming to someone's rescue. If I'm rescuing anyone, its you people from
your own immaturity. I see now, however, that that's not possible.

Keith Alexander finally made a good point by saying:


> Last, you need a haircut.

You're absolutely right. I need a trim. I've also considered chopping it
up to shoulder level or slightly below.


-wrath

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 9:04:46 PM11/2/02
to
On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 01:50:31 GMT, wrath <wr...@NOSPAM.webscure.net>
belched:

> (You mean newbies can dislike members of the list too? No way!)

*** RAB is not a list.

> > Second, she's a pussy who blocks incoming mail and page views.

>I would too coming from you. Why would you not block someone you didn't
>like?

*** Because even people you don't like often have
something valuable to say.

>Not the history of it, no, but the hilarity of it I need no time to
>grasp because there is none.

*** They go hand in hand, fucknut.

>There's no humor in this. Its really just
>mindless and stupid and only entertains you because you've all decided
>you don't like her and seem to get off on being a jerk.

*** Actually, it's far from mindless. You just can't see it for
what it is. I mean hell, all Lish did was post three pictures, right?

> but there's no need for it...nor is it amusing.

*** Need, no. Probably not. But there is no need for RAB, either.
And I found it amusing. If you had ANY idea of the history
and of her innanity, you would to.

> > Fourth, don't flatter yourself as a hero.

>If I'm rescuing anyone, its you people from your own immaturity.

*** Man oh man, you really are a fucking prat, aren't you?

Immaturity, I just read some of your pages. Boo fucking hoo.

Anne Greenblat says hello.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 9:14:38 PM11/2/02
to
. <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:

> Rock. Over 18?
>
> You need to be over 18 to do it with me. Over 26 for meaningful
> conversation.

12/9/67.

--
Queenie

wrath

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 9:14:50 PM11/2/02
to
Keith AlexanderŽ wrote:

>
> Immaturity, I just read some of your pages. Boo fucking hoo.


And on that note, I think its time to leave this playpen. I just
realized I'm pretty much wasting my time reading this stupidity.

Just thought I'd give you all the curtesy of a little 'goodbye'. And no,
I don't plan on being one of those people who comes back.

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 9:26:53 PM11/2/02
to
On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 02:14:50 GMT, wrath <wr...@NOSPAM.webscure.net>
belched:

>And on that note, I think its time to leave this playpen.

*** Your call. At least now you won't have to hold your
breath anymore!

>I just realized I'm pretty much wasting my time reading this stupidity.

*** Oh, there is PLENTY that goes on here of value. Some of
it of great value. Lot's of stupid shit too, but lots a valuable
discourse. Run along now. And take those other two
with you!

>Just thought I'd give you all the curtesy of a little 'goodbye'.

*** Make sure the skirt is held at the hem, index and thumb
only, for a proper curtsey. Now if you meant "courtesy," save
it and go.

>And no, I don't plan on being one of those people who comes back.

*** You'll be back.

Chris Issac is a God. A GOD.

.

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 9:27:19 PM11/2/02
to
wrath <wr...@nospam.webscure.net> wrote:
> . wrote:
>
>>
>> Why are you even here?
>
>
> One potential answer to that might be because I was under the
> (incorrect) impression that because you knew what you were talking about
> on your FAQ, you and the others here might actually be worth my time. My
> initial impression is that I was quite wrong, but I'm going to give it
> time anyway. After all, I've got plenty of it, and nobody here really
> has the ability to upset me because, when all is said and done, you're
> just a bunch of faceless people on the other side of a magic box.
> Considering some fairly useful information gets posted here on a
> relatively regular basis which will therefore allow me to learn more
> about things I'd like to learn about, I stay. I'd say I hope that answer
> satisfies you, but the truth is I really don't care. (You mean newbies
> can dislike members of the list too? No way!)
>

No useful information has been posted here in at least three years.


-----.

.

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 9:28:07 PM11/2/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:

Wh00t. Lets do it.

Wait...yer not that crazy chick who teaches at Northwestern back
to haunt me, are you?


-----.

LongCoolWoman

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 9:29:56 PM11/2/02
to
"nina stoessinger" <alta...@yahoo.de> wrote in message
news:aq1lt6$5p9vm$1...@ID-16872.news.dfncis.de...

> i missed you guys.

Good lord.

And just WHERE in the hell have you BEEN for the past two years,
hmm???

Mara


Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 9:38:04 PM11/2/02
to
On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 02:27:19 GMT, yt...@mutilation.net (.) belched:

>No useful information has been posted here in at least three years.

*** Well, yeah. It's all available in other places.

This used to be a nicer place.

I like pie.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 9:57:54 PM11/2/02
to
. <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Rock. Over 18?
> >>
> >> You need to be over 18 to do it with me. Over 26 for meaningful
> >> conversation.
> >
> > 12/9/67.
> >
>
> Wh00t. Lets do it.

ok, but only if we can loll around discussing america's perpetually
shameful response to genocide afterwards.

> Wait...yer not that crazy chick who teaches at Northwestern back
> to haunt me, are you?

you're safe. i have no desire to be a teacher - i make a much better
student.

--
Queenie
schoolgirl

.

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 10:25:57 PM11/2/02
to
Keith Alexander? <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 02:27:19 GMT, yt...@mutilation.net (.) belched:
>
>>No useful information has been posted here in at least three years.
>
> *** Well, yeah. It's all available in other places.
>

Precisely. RAB has become redundant.



> This used to be a nicer place.
>

Agreed. I miss anne greenbleat.

> I like pie.
>

Ew.


-----.

.

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 10:29:25 PM11/2/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Rock. Over 18?
>> >>
>> >> You need to be over 18 to do it with me. Over 26 for meaningful
>> >> conversation.
>> >
>> > 12/9/67.
>> >
>>
>> Wh00t. Lets do it.
>
> ok, but only if we can loll around discussing america's perpetually
> shameful response to genocide afterwards.
>

Goddamnit. How come sex always costs so much.


-----.

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 10:37:55 PM11/2/02
to
On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 03:25:57 GMT, yt...@mutilation.net (.) belched:

>> I like pie.

>Ew.

*** I knew you were gay.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 2, 2002, 10:42:27 PM11/2/02
to
. <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:

> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> >> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> >> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Rock. Over 18?
> >> >>
> >> >> You need to be over 18 to do it with me. Over 26 for meaningful
> >> >> conversation.
> >> >
> >> > 12/9/67.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Wh00t. Lets do it.
> >
> > ok, but only if we can loll around discussing america's perpetually
> > shameful response to genocide afterwards.
> >
>
> Goddamnit. How come sex always costs so much.

i'd settle for punk rock & bonghits.

--
Queenie
mhm27x16
easy but never free

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 12:29:10 AM11/3/02
to
On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 22:35:11 -0600, David RL Gartner
<sticknee...@mindspring.com> belched:

>wrong, asshole. she's not subscribed.

*** Oh yes she is, davey.

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 12:30:29 AM11/3/02
to
On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 22:59:21 -0600, David RL Gartner
<sticknee...@mindspring.com> belched:

>but re: you, that's rarely the case.

*** Perhaps.

But you? Never even once.

:-)

Do you realize how impotent you come across in ASCII?

fr0glet

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 1:24:12 AM11/3/02
to
"Keith Alexander®" <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote...

> On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 22:35:11 -0600, David RL Gartner
> <sticknee...@mindspring.com> belched:
>
> >wrong, asshole. she's not subscribed.
>
> *** Oh yes she is, davey.

This point can only be proven if one of you has gained access to the
contents of her hard drive.

At the VERY LEAST, she reads google groups. That's enough.

Incidentally, her iam page reflects that this incident has been quite
disturbing for her.

fr0glet


i'll teach you to turn away.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 1:43:08 AM11/3/02
to
i'll teach you to turn away. <cr...@got.net> wrote:
lish> <defunct files>

i make cool stuff happen on rab.

it may not be informative, but it certainly is entertaining.

to whomever claimed bekkkah isn't subscribed: it hardly matters if
she reads rab on her own. obviously someonedrlg has forwarded her the
thread, & my implicit knowledge that would occur is enough to assure
anyone that i still don't talk behind people's back.

email me, bekkkah! let's chat!

lish "sometimes she's more metal
cr...@got.net inside than out." -hm
38.5% / 30 RANA 125 / 68

Corine Bohan

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 2:26:00 AM11/3/02
to
"fr0glet" <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote in message
news:us9fsm5...@corp.supernews.com...

> This point can only be proven if one of you has gained access to the
> contents of her hard drive.
>
> At the VERY LEAST, she reads google groups. That's enough.
>
> Incidentally, her iam page reflects that this incident has been quite
> disturbing for her.

*Fr0glet dear, devious as usual.
I picture you with a scanner in one hand and a dildo in the other one.
I'd not let her near a pc or a pretty chix or they'll both be violated.
Wicked indeed :P

Corine


.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 3:53:07 AM11/3/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>
>> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> >> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> >> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Rock. Over 18?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You need to be over 18 to do it with me. Over 26 for meaningful
>> >> >> conversation.
>> >> >
>> >> > 12/9/67.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Wh00t. Lets do it.
>> >
>> > ok, but only if we can loll around discussing america's perpetually
>> > shameful response to genocide afterwards.
>> >
>>
>> Goddamnit. How come sex always costs so much.
>
> i'd settle for punk rock & bonghits.
>

You're on. I'll bring the bong.

Uhhhh..huhhhuhuh.

Yeah.


-----.

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 3:53:29 AM11/3/02
to
Keith Alexander? <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 03:25:57 GMT, yt...@mutilation.net (.) belched:
>
>>> I like pie.
>
>>Ew.
>
> *** I knew you were gay.
>

God.

Damnit.


-----.

fr0glet

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 3:55:14 AM11/3/02
to
"Corine Bohan" <smilin...@home.nl.killspam> wrote...
> "fr0glet" <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote...

> > This point can only be proven if one of you has gained access to the
> > contents of her hard drive.
> >
> > At the VERY LEAST, she reads google groups. That's enough.
> >
> > Incidentally, her iam page reflects that this incident has been quite
> > disturbing for her.
>
> *Fr0glet dear, devious as usual.

Who, me? I was just sayin'.

> I picture you with a scanner in one hand and a dildo in the other one.

Ridiculously high-resolution scanner is here on my desk, though dildos are
put away in the toybox.

> Wicked indeed :P

*grin*

fr0glet


.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 3:54:23 AM11/3/02
to
Keith Alexander? <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 22:35:11 -0600, David RL Gartner
> <sticknee...@mindspring.com> belched:
>
>>wrong, asshole. she's not subscribed.
>
> *** Oh yes she is, davey.
>

Its sweet that he thinks she doesnt lie to him though.


-----.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 4:02:07 AM11/3/02
to

settle down, beavis.

--
Queenie

Nina Baltes

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 4:31:48 AM11/3/02
to
. wrote:

> No useful information has been posted here in at least three years.

I take that personally :P.

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

nina stoessinger

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 7:42:30 AM11/3/02
to
"Corine Bohan" <smilin...@home.nl.killspam> wrote:
>
> *Hey Nina2, how's life in the US?!
> Glad to see you are still lurking!
> Do you miss swizterland?

yes, but i'm not in the u.s. anymore :)

i'm in germany now. studying design. it's wicked.


nina


nina stoessinger

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 7:42:56 AM11/3/02
to
"LongCoolWoman" <domfr...@coxadoodledoo.net> wrote:
>
> And just WHERE in the hell have you BEEN for the past two years,
> hmm???

let's see...
new york
switzerland
germany
...that's about it :)


nina


.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 8:49:01 AM11/3/02
to
Nina Baltes <ni...@chaotropic.net> wrote:
> . wrote:
>
>> No useful information has been posted here in at least three years.
>
> I take that personally :P.
>

Ok, except for the stuff Nina has posted. :P


-----.


.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 8:50:11 AM11/3/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Goddamnit. How come sex always costs so much.
>> >
>> > i'd settle for punk rock & bonghits.
>> >
>>
>> You're on. I'll bring the bong.
>>
>> Uhhhh..huhhhuhuh.
>>
>> Yeah.
>
> settle down, beavis.
>


You said "beaver". That was cool.


-----.

Nina Baltes

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 9:19:51 AM11/3/02
to

8D

Corine Bohan

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 9:25:51 AM11/3/02
to
"nina stoessinger" <alta...@yahoo.de> wrote in message
news:aq36ir$65esf$1...@ID-16872.news.dfncis.de...

> yes, but i'm not in the u.s. anymore :)
>
> i'm in germany now. studying design. it's wicked.

*Oh cool! Don't you think they speak a weird dialect? ;)
I'll be in Vallorbe in february, I guess you're too far for a munch or
something...
Chocolate, trouts and powder snow. Yum.

Corine
--
A man generally has two reasons for doing a thing. One that sounds good, and
a real one. J.Pierpoint Morgan

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 11:07:41 AM11/3/02
to
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:24:12 -0800, "fr0glet"
<fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> belched:

>This point can only be proven if one of you has gained access to the
>contents of her hard drive.

*** That's not true, but hey...

>Incidentally, her iam page reflects that this incident has been quite
>disturbing for her.

*** Lish posted some URLS.

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 11:20:56 AM11/3/02
to
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:24:12 -0800, "fr0glet"
<fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> belched:

>Incidentally, her iam page reflects that this incident has been quite
>disturbing for her.

*** If she's not subscribed, how would she know?

Could it be that her so-called friends find a perverse
pleasure in keeping her aprised, as opposed to shielded?

I can't say that I saw the point in posting the URLs.
It caused me to waste 25 minutes trying to identify
who the portraits portray. I still can't figure them
out. But hell, I have some bad tattoos and you
can post them all you like with out me being driven
to pills.

But it is fun watching those other three twitch.

RAB is like a test tube. A social experiment.

Hey Lish? What can you do about Greenblaat?

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 11:35:29 AM11/3/02
to
fr0glet <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
> "Keith Alexander?" <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote...

Then shes obviously not taking enough medication.


-----.


i'll teach you to turn away.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 1:09:43 PM11/3/02
to
Keith Alexander® <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
KA> I can't say that I saw the point in posting the URLs.
KA> It caused me to waste 25 minutes trying to identify
KA> who the portraits portray. I still can't figure them

i posted them mainly so everyone could look at her bra. i found it
terrifying, & the best way to relieve that terror was to share it with as
many people as possible. 60,000!

the shitty portraiture has been around in photos for years. i
think one is cobain, one's cooper, & one's john lennon. alice cooper
doesn't make much sense though, since the piece is supposed to be
"heaven's bar" or some crap, & alice is only dead inside, as evidenced by
his fucking hotel commercials.

& of course, calvin & hobbes are in the middle, because bekkkah is
the pinnacle of well-planned tattoo work. it's truly a shame - all that
skin, & not a single good piece of tattoo art.

KA> out. But hell, I have some bad tattoos and you
KA> can post them all you like with out me being driven
KA> to pills.

i posted my worst one on bme!@@!

but then i ran to the bathroom & ate as many OTC drugs as i could
find. :( :(:(

which was none. :) :): )

KA> But it is fun watching those other three twitch.
KA> RAB is like a test tube. A social experiment.
KA> Hey Lish? What can you do about Greenblaat?

it's fortunate that my entertaining myself also entertains keith.
that's why we've been friends for a million years.

greenblatt never interested me all that much. she's gross, yes, &
fat & dykey & fat. i guess it's something about all the heroin that makes
me move on to greener pastures (with different cows).

lish "ignorance by choice
cr...@got.net or just plain fucking dumb?" -pr

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 1:17:04 PM11/3/02
to
On 3 Nov 2002 18:09:43 GMT, i'll teach you to turn away.
<cr...@got.net> belched:

> it's fortunate that my entertaining myself also entertains keith.

*** Trust me, you entertain plenty others.

Wrath? Wrath?! WRAAAAAAAATH?!

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 1:30:51 PM11/3/02
to
. <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> >> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> >> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Goddamnit. How come sex always costs so much.
> >> >
> >> > i'd settle for punk rock & bonghits.
> >> >
> >>
> >> You're on. I'll bring the bong.
> >>
> >> Uhhhh..huhhhuhuh.
> >>
> >> Yeah.
> >
> > settle down, beavis.
> >
>
>
> You said "beaver". That was cool.

i think that means you're gonna score.

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 1:39:17 PM11/3/02
to
On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 18:30:51 GMT, que...@hotmail.com (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) belched:

>i think that means you're gonna score.

*** Make him wash his feet first.

Tabaqui

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 2:25:05 PM11/3/02
to

wrath wrote:

> You're absolutely right. I need a trim. I've also considered chopping it
> up to shoulder level or slightly below.

Nooooooo!
Why, for the love of god, WHY!!!!!
People, STOP CUTTING YOUR HAIR!

I cannot say this enough.

TQ

Tabaqui

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 2:26:15 PM11/3/02
to

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
>
> . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>
> > Rock. Over 18?
> >
> > You need to be over 18 to do it with me. Over 26 for meaningful
> > conversation.
>
> 12/9/67.
>

1967 was an AWESOME year.

TQ (4/18/67)

Tabaqui

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 2:29:57 PM11/3/02
to

Nina Baltes wrote:

> C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
> Louis Pasteur

You know, somebody made a big deal out of this sig. just
recently.... could you translate? My french is pretty much
ALL gone...

TQ

Nina Baltes

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 2:35:29 PM11/3/02
to
Tabaqui wrote:
>
>
> wrath wrote:
>
> > You're absolutely right. I need a trim. I've also considered chopping it
> > up to shoulder level or slightly below.
>
> Nooooooo!
> Why, for the love of god, WHY!!!!!

Because *really long* hair sucks ass on many levels. Once it's past
a certain length, you can't really do much with it. The weight also
pulls my curls flat.

For me, the limit is the lower rim of my shoulder blades.

Nina
--

C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur

http://www.chaotropic.net

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 2:36:27 PM11/3/02
to
Keith Alexander® <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 18:30:51 GMT, que...@hotmail.com (The Queen of
> Cans and Jars) belched:
>
> >i think that means you're gonna score.
>
> *** Make him wash his feet first.

are you kidding? if i do that he'll expect me to shave my moustache.

--
Queenie

Nina Baltes

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 2:51:42 PM11/3/02
to

The microbes will have the last word :)

Nina
--

C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur

http://www.chaotropic.net

i'll teach you to turn away.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 3:02:22 PM11/3/02
to
Keith Alexander® <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
KA> On 3 Nov 2002 18:09:43 GMT, i'll teach you to turn away.

> it's fortunate that my entertaining myself also entertains keith.
KA> *** Trust me, you entertain plenty others.
KA> Wrath? Wrath?! WRAAAAAAAATH?!

i think what you mean is that my entertaining myself CAUSES others
to BE entertaining. that's wrath.

lish "i wish i were an international sensation;
cr...@got.net i'd blame these words on a bad translation." -jc

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 3:28:17 PM11/3/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> >> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> >> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Goddamnit. How come sex always costs so much.
>> >> >
>> >> > i'd settle for punk rock & bonghits.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> You're on. I'll bring the bong.
>> >>
>> >> Uhhhh..huhhhuhuh.
>> >>
>> >> Yeah.
>> >
>> > settle down, beavis.
>> >
>>
>>
>> You said "beaver". That was cool.
>
> i think that means you're gonna score.
>

Ok, but you have to buy me dinner. And hold all the doors open.


-----.

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 3:28:37 PM11/3/02
to
Keith Alexander? <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 18:30:51 GMT, que...@hotmail.com (The Queen of
> Cans and Jars) belched:
>
>>i think that means you're gonna score.
>
> *** Make him wash his feet first.
>

I smell *totally* different now.


-----.

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 3:29:06 PM11/3/02
to
> are you kidding? if i do that he'll expect me to shave my moustache.
>

Alright, now youre just teasing me.

:(


-----.

fr0glet

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 4:21:06 PM11/3/02
to
"Keith Alexander®" <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote...

> On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 22:24:12 -0800, "fr0glet"
> <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> belched:
>
> >Incidentally, her iam page reflects that this incident has been quite
> >disturbing for her.
>
> *** If she's not subscribed, how would she know?
>
> Could it be that her so-called friends find a perverse
> pleasure in keeping her aprised, as opposed to shielded?

Yes, or Google groups. Or perhaps the heavy web traffic that suddenly hit
those pages led her to go read RAB to find out if it was the source. *shrug*
we'll never know.

> RAB is like a test tube. A social experiment.

Not just RAB, all of Usenet. It's really rather disturbing, those results.

fr0glet


The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 4:33:00 PM11/3/02
to
. <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:

i'm mean like that. but wash your feet just in case, ok?

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 4:33:08 PM11/3/02
to

jesusfuck. you better have *good* pot.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 4:33:15 PM11/3/02
to
Tabaqui <chang...@catbones.com> wrote:

i always thought it was the perfect year to be born in ;)

--
Queenie

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 4:33:23 PM11/3/02
to
Tabaqui <chang...@catbones.com> wrote:

long hair, short brains.

--
Queenie
that said,
mine's past
my bra strap

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 5:19:37 PM11/3/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> >> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> >> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> >> >> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
>> >> >> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Goddamnit. How come sex always costs so much.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > i'd settle for punk rock & bonghits.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You're on. I'll bring the bong.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Uhhhh..huhhhuhuh.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yeah.
>> >> >
>> >> > settle down, beavis.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You said "beaver". That was cool.
>> >
>> > i think that means you're gonna score.
>> >
>>
>> Ok, but you have to buy me dinner. And hold all the doors open.
>
> jesusfuck. you better have *good* pot.
>

Why I never.

I would never endorse or take part in such debauchery.


-----.*


*high on life

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 5:20:17 PM11/3/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:

Fine. But im not shaving my kidneys.


-----.

Curt

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 5:45:14 PM11/3/02
to
ke...@nootrope.net (Keith Alexander ) wrote
[snip]
> On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 02:14:50 GMT, wrath
[snip]
> >I just realized I'm pretty much wasting my time reading this stupidity.
>
> *** Oh, there is PLENTY that goes on here of value. Some of
> it of great value.
> Lot's of stupid shit too, but lots a valuable
^^^^^^^^^
> discourse. Run along now. And take those other two
> with you!
>
> >Just thought I'd give you all the curtesy of a little 'goodbye'.
>
> *** Make sure the skirt is held at the hem, index and thumb
> only, for a proper curtsey. Now if you meant "courtesy," save
> it and go.

Yeah, he misspelled courtesy. Purdy quick of you, Keith. Now what's
that "Lot's" in your reply all about? Not a typo, of course. You
asked, "Frequently?" (elsewhere) and stated, "Hardly." Well, "yes" is
not spelled h-a-r-d-l-y, okay?

I don't care about spelling errors, but I do find your find-a-
splinter-in-someone-else's-post-but-ignore-that-log-in-yer-
own-mug attitude of yours rather amusing.

And lish posted more than three pics. She included a statement about
the person's gastro surgery and loose skin, fwiw. Maybe you missed
that.

--
Curt
http://iam.bmezine.com/?curt
http://www.curtjames.com/

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 5:57:45 PM11/3/02
to
On 3 Nov 2002 14:45:14 -0800, curt_...@yahoo.com (Curt) belched:

>I don't care about spelling errors, but I do find your find-a-
>splinter-in-someone-else's-post-but-ignore-that-log-in-yer-
>own-mug attitude of yours rather amusing.

*** Listen, douchebag, here is the story.

1) You don't gauge a piercing when you want it larger.

2) You don't vote in a census.

These are my only points. They are not splinters.

Now fuck off.

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 6:00:05 PM11/3/02
to
On 3 Nov 2002 14:45:14 -0800, curt_...@yahoo.com (Curt) belched:

>And lish posted more than three pics. She included a statement about


>the person's gastro surgery and loose skin, fwiw.

*** Damn. Didn't she say anything about excessive use
of medication and victimhood?

That Lish, she must be slipping.

I'll talk to her for you.

Oh, and to lose weight? Eat less and exersize more.

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 6:04:27 PM11/3/02
to

Lish did not post pics, because she knows better than to post binaries
to a non-binary hierarchy.

Make sure drllggdlasgdl gets it all, curt.


-----.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 8:01:05 PM11/3/02
to

can you put little hats on them? i think that would be nice.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 8:01:12 PM11/3/02
to
. <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, but you have to buy me dinner. And hold all the doors open.
> >
> > jesusfuck. you better have *good* pot.
> >
>
> Why I never.
>
> I would never endorse or take part in such debauchery.

mmhmm.

> *high on life

life is the only thing worth living for ... at least, that's what don
knotts told my cousin.

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 8:05:03 PM11/3/02
to

Don Knotts kind of makes me heave. Something about the eyes.

George Takei told me that it was "most excellent to meet me" once.

And he was right. It is.


-----.

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 8:05:24 PM11/3/02
to

Are you ok with yarmulkes?


-----.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 8:22:45 PM11/3/02
to
. <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> >> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> >> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > are you kidding? if i do that he'll expect me to shave my moustache.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Alright, now youre just teasing me.
> >> >>
> >> >> :(
> >> >
> >> > i'm mean like that. but wash your feet just in case, ok?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Fine. But im not shaving my kidneys.
> >
> > can you put little hats on them? i think that would be nice.
>
> Are you ok with yarmulkes?

oy vey, am i? i've always been hot for things jewish.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 8:22:54 PM11/3/02
to
. <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> >
> >> *high on life
> >
> > life is the only thing worth living for ... at least, that's what don
> > knotts told my cousin.
> >
>
> Don Knotts kind of makes me heave. Something about the eyes.

oh he's creepy as hell, no doubt about it.

> George Takei told me that it was "most excellent to meet me" once.
>
> And he was right. It is.

should i kiss your ring now?

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 8:55:56 PM11/3/02
to

Yes. I even have cute kneepads for you.

Also, this is a post from the latest cvs snapshot of tin.

I'm trying it out. I'm so 31337.


-----.

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 9:17:00 PM11/3/02
to
Keith Alexander® <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:

> Oh, and to lose weight? Eat less and exersize more.

amen. gastric bypass surgery is mostly all wrong.

--
Queenie

fr0glet

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 9:44:07 PM11/3/02
to
"The Queen of Cans and Jars" <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote...

> Keith Alexander® <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
>
> > Oh, and to lose weight? Eat less and exersize more.
>
> amen. gastric bypass surgery is mostly all wrong.

I'm dying to know how you came to this educated opinion.

Seriously.

fr0glet


i'll teach you to turn away.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 10:00:45 PM11/3/02
to
The Queen of Cans and Jars <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote:
TQoCaJ> amen. gastric bypass surgery is mostly all wrong.

it's neat when people get FPS (fat person surgery) & don't follow
any of the dietary changes. i know a guy who had it done & basically ate
chicken wings & ice cream for months. he shed weight because he couldn't
digest it, though, & would often regale me with stories of how he SHAT
CARAMEL. that sort of image sticks with a person.

lish "before i fuck your mother,
cr...@got.net i'm going to break her arm." -hr

The Queen of Cans and Jars

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 10:04:02 PM11/3/02
to
fr0glet <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:

> "The Queen of Cans and Jars" <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote...

> > Keith AlexanderŽ <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Oh, and to lose weight? Eat less and exersize more.
> >
> > amen. gastric bypass surgery is mostly all wrong.
>
> I'm dying to know how you came to this educated opinion.
>
> Seriously.

first of all, i do realize that there are people for whom it is a
helpful thing - hence "mostly." i'm not stupid enough to make a blanket
statement about such a thing, and i pass no negative judgement on people
for whom such surgery is a medical necessity.

however, what i know about the after effects from it are what turn me
off completely. in another newsgroup i participate in, one woman
recently posted about her mother who has had her life effectively
destroyed by her experience with the surgery. while it may be a panacea
for some (and i would never deny them their right to it), i am of the
opinion that it should be the last line of defense after less invasive
methods have been tried and truly failed.

based on what i have read about it, and based on the fact that i never
needed to lose more than fifty or so pounds, it would not ever be a
viable solution for *me,* and i would have a very hard time endorsing it
for the average person who just needs to lose some weight. i believe
that *most* people can achieve their weight loss goals through diet and
exercise. not all. most.

--
Queenie

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 10:12:00 PM11/3/02
to
On 4 Nov 2002 03:00:45 GMT, i'll teach you to turn away.
<cr...@got.net> belched:

> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL
> SHAT CARAMEL

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 10:24:36 PM11/3/02
to
fr0glet <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
> "The Queen of Cans and Jars" <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote...
>> Keith Alexander? <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Oh, and to lose weight? Eat less and exersize more.
>>
>> amen. gastric bypass surgery is mostly all wrong.
>
> I'm dying to know how you came to this educated opinion.
>
> Seriously.
>

Oh jesus christ.

Shut the fuck up. Seriously.

Being really fat is mostly like drinking a shit ton of alchohol
constantly. Its the consumer's fault, mostly.

Mostly, if the consumer wants to puss out and spend a fuckton of
their insurance's money (keeping the rest of our rates up) on getting
most of their fat sliced off their body, then theyre mostly motherfucking
shitheads.

Id love, just once to hear a really big huge fat person (who is not fat
BECAUSE of an actual physiological disorder---eating too much and never
moving around is not a physiological disorder) say "yeah, im really huge
and big and fat because I eat way, way too much and I never get off the
couch".

Oh wait, I have heard that a few times. Mostly from big huge fat people
that I like.


-----.


Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 10:29:32 PM11/3/02
to
On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 03:24:36 GMT, yt...@mutilation.net (.) belched:

>Oh wait, I have heard that a few times. Mostly from big huge fat people
>that I like.

*** Was that before or after they beat you in that foot race?

.

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 10:27:23 PM11/3/02
to
Keith Alexander? <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 03:24:36 GMT, yt...@mutilation.net (.) belched:
>
>>Oh wait, I have heard that a few times. Mostly from big huge fat people
>>that I like.
>
> *** Was that before or after they beat you in that foot race?
>

God, I fucking hate curt so much.


-----.

Keith Alexander®

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 10:39:41 PM11/3/02
to
On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 03:27:23 GMT, yt...@mutilation.net (.) belched:

>God, I fucking hate curt so much.

*** He was ok. I mean, without him, we may
not ever have been blessed with Dave Grohl.

That said, suicide is for cunts.

fr0glet

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 11:02:30 PM11/3/02
to
"The Queen of Cans and Jars" <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote...
> fr0glet <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
> > "The Queen of Cans and Jars" <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote...
> > > Keith Alexander® <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh, and to lose weight? Eat less and exersize more.
> > >
> > > amen. gastric bypass surgery is mostly all wrong.
> >
> > I'm dying to know how you came to this educated opinion.
> >
> > Seriously.
>
> first of all, i do realize that there are people for whom it is a
> helpful thing - hence "mostly." i'm not stupid enough to make a blanket
> statement about such a thing, and i pass no negative judgement on people
> for whom such surgery is a medical necessity.

Which leads me to my next question:

How is making a decision to beautify your physical presence through a
surgery to help you lose weight any different than any other type of body
modification?

> however, what i know about the after effects from it are what turn me
> off completely.

There are risks. Perhaps more risks than a more "standard" body
modification. Perhaps people who are willing to take those risks are
extreme. If the benefits outweigh the risks, perhaps it's worth it.

> in another newsgroup i participate in, one woman
> recently posted about her mother who has had her life effectively
> destroyed by her experience with the surgery.

Let me be the woman in THIS newsgroup to tell you her mother's life was
permanently altered for the better by her weight loss surgery. How was her
life made so much better, you ask? After her surgically prompted weight
loss, she was finally able to participate in family activities. She had 10x
the energy that she used to have. She could pick up her children. She was
able to shop for clothing in normal stores. She was far more socially
accepted after becoming a thin person. Her self esteem quadrupled. She could
ride in normal cars. Her legs, hips, and back stopped aching constantly.

> my opinion that it should be the last line of defense after less invasive


> methods have been tried and truly failed.
>
> based on what i have read about it, and based on the fact that i never
> needed to lose more than fifty or so pounds, it would not ever be a
> viable solution for *me,* and i would have a very hard time endorsing it
> for the average person who just needs to lose some weight. i believe
> that *most* people can achieve their weight loss goals through diet and
> exercise. not all. most.

I say that your opinion is based on not enough information. Let someone you
love repeatedly fail to lost weight with diet and excercise. Let someone you
love or even just care about have a tremendous health risk that could kill
them at anytime. After you've experienced that, re-evaluate your opinion.

Does it really have to be their last shot? If they don't have the
self-control to rid themselves of the weight with diet and exercise, why
shouldn't they be able to have their body modified to suit their own tastes?
What business of anyone else's is that?

Is it more or less wrong to be a man who wants to be castrated or a woman
who wants to have a surgery to lose weight? What if I want to slice my labia
off? Isn't that my right? If I think that's going to make me feel a lot
better and I'm aware of the risks and can make the decision as an adult,
weight-loss surgery is no different.

fr0glet


fr0glet

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 11:15:13 PM11/3/02
to
"." <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote...

> fr0glet <fr0...@fr0glet.hates.spambots.org> wrote:
> > "The Queen of Cans and Jars" <que...@bungmunch.org> wrote...
> >> Keith Alexander? <ke...@nootrope.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Oh, and to lose weight? Eat less and exersize more.
> >>
> >> amen. gastric bypass surgery is mostly all wrong.
> >
> > I'm dying to know how you came to this educated opinion.
> >
> > Seriously.
> >
>
> Oh jesus christ.
>
> Shut the fuck up. Seriously.

I can't. I went on. See other reply.

> Being really fat is mostly like drinking a shit ton of alchohol
> constantly. Its the consumer's fault, mostly.

Which means what? Fault has an influence on the "rightness" of a surgery?

> their insurance's money (keeping the rest of our rates up) on getting

A valid argument. But I doubt that rates would go down if gastric bypass was
banned in the USA. You can't change insurance rates. You can't cause
insurance reform. Deal.

fr0glet


LadyJ

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 11:24:17 PM11/3/02
to
On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 03:24:36 GMT, yt...@mutilation.net (.) wrote:

>Id love, just once to hear a really big huge fat person (who is not fat
>BECAUSE of an actual physiological disorder---eating too much and never
>moving around is not a physiological disorder) say "yeah, im really huge
>and big and fat because I eat way, way too much and I never get off the
>couch".

I'm fat because I lack discipline. At this point I'm working on making
sure I don't get fatter. In the past, I've been too ambitious with my
weight loss plans, and ended up failing so spectacularly that I gained
more. Being fatter would mightily suck, so I'm really just interested
in maintaining this weight, or losing a pound or so a week. I did
backslide a bit in the past couple weeks, but I regained much less
weight this time around than I have in other backslides. This, to me,
indicates that the slow and steady approach actually does work better.

Today, out of nowhere, I really wrenched my back. Stuff like that is
really great incentive to invest energy in losing weight, because
being fat makes my back hurt.

The one sucky thing about losing weight is that you have to buy more
clothes. I'm trying to get a part-time job at Lane Bryant. Then I'll
have some extra money, and a kick-ass discount at my favorite clothing
store. New clothes that you can actually afford is always a great
weight-loss incentive. Cross your fingers for me.

Jess

Suziwan

unread,
Nov 3, 2002, 11:46:56 PM11/3/02
to

Not commenting on the rest of it all, because frankly I don't care, but the
logic here is "off" enough to irk my ego to move out of lurk mode for a
moment.

*Actually* the insurance costs from health problems directly related to
morbid obesity (heart disease and diabetes to name two huge examples) far
surpass the costs of gastric bypass surgery. In fact I would guess that if
all morbidly obese people had the surgery insurance rates just might go down
in the long term.

--
Suziwan
http://iam.bmezine.com/?Suziwan

Lara

unread,
Nov 4, 2002, 12:02:09 AM11/4/02
to
Tabaqui <chang...@catbones.com> wrote:

> The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> >
> > . <yt...@mutilation.net> wrote:
> > > You need to be over 18 to do it with me. Over 26 for meaningful
> > > conversation.
> >
> > 12/9/67.
> >
> 1967 was an AWESOME year.
>
> TQ (4/18/67)

Hell yeah.

Lara "IHNTA" Hopkisn

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages