Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ideas that don't go together

3 views
Skip to first unread message

David Oldridge

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 2:41:22 AM11/10/02
to
I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably disturbs
more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go with hentai" category.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813


Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 2:57:15 AM11/10/02
to
"David Oldridge" <david.old...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:C4oz9.42435$MGm1....@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...

> I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably disturbs
> more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go with hentai" category.
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813

Well, damn, now I have to go scrub my brain out with steel wool.

Catherine Johnson.
--
dis "able" to reply
"Oh, he makes me so mad! The horrible puny-brained meat child, with his
little glasses, and his... head! 'My name is Dib, with my pointy hair!'
Pointy hair! 'I eat food and have stuff!'."
-Zim, during one of his funnier rants, _Invader Zim_.


Ethan Hammond

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 4:47:46 AM11/10/02
to

Ohhhh God no!!!! *cringes in the fetal position*

--
All Purpose Cultural Randomness
http://www.angelfire.com/tx/apcr/index.html

The Eternal Lost Lurker (I have the HORNY!)

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 5:31:57 AM11/10/02
to

"David Oldridge" <david.old...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:C4oz9.42435$MGm1....@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably disturbs
> more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go with hentai" category.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813

No surprise there. Still, GAH. >_<


--
_____________________________
I wonder why coffee tastes so good
when you're naked with your family.
_____________________________
[Chiyo] "Ah! This is my cute vibrator!"
[Osaka] "Ah! That's a cute vibrator!"
[Sakaki] "....cute vibrator..."
_____________________________
* The Eternal Lost Lurker
(who wonders if Bubbles uses a
Hello Kitty vibrator...)
http://www.lurkerdrome.com
_____________________________

Ethan Hammond

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 7:06:47 AM11/10/02
to

D-Chance.

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 8:31:01 AM11/10/02
to
Wow, they got in the DC Comics logo knock-off,
the Cartoon Network knock-off, the Power Puff
Girls name knock-off, and the horrible Japanese to
English translation ("What do you want us?") all one
one cover!


RPManny

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 10:01:05 AM11/10/02
to

"Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in message
news:vjoz9.482689$o.63...@news1.west.cox.net...

> "David Oldridge" <david.old...@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:C4oz9.42435$MGm1....@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
>
> > I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably disturbs
> > more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go with hentai" category.
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813
>
> Well, damn, now I have to go scrub my brain out with steel wool.
>
> Catherine Johnson.
> --
You and I, both. This is a bit too much, for me.

Richard


S.t.A.n.L.e.E

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 11:10:51 AM11/10/02
to

Sad thing is, there are much worse.

Laters. =)

Stan
--
_______ ________ _______ ____ ___ ___ ______ ______
| __|__ __| _ | \ | | | | _____| _____|
|__ | | | | _ | |\ | |___| ____|| ____|
|_______| |__| |__| |__|___| \ ___|_______|______|______|
__| | ( )
/ _ | |/ Stanlee Dometita sta...@cif.rochester.edu
| ( _| | U of Rochester cif.rochester.edu/~stanlee
\ ______| _______ ____ ___
/ \ / \ | _ | \ | |
/ \/ \| _ | |\ |
/___/\/\___|__| |__|___| \ ___|


Arnold Kim

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 8:30:46 PM11/10/02
to

Ethan Hammond <esha...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:3DCE4C...@worldnet.att.net...

Well, at least that's _funny_, if incredibly disturbing.

Arnold Kim


Ethan Hammond

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 8:53:41 PM11/10/02
to
Arnold Kim wrote:
>
> Ethan Hammond <esha...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:3DCE4C...@worldnet.att.net..
> > This is pretty awful too:
> >
> > http://www.snapbag.com/~flux/tf/toyrotica/index2.html
>
> Well, at least that's _funny_, if incredibly disturbing.

I guess. You have to wonder how much time that guys spends
on that stuff. ^_^;;

Frank White

unread,
Nov 10, 2002, 9:31:22 PM11/10/02
to
In article <C4oz9.42435$MGm1....@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>,
david.old...@rogers.com says...

>
> I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably disturbs
>more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go with hentai" category.
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813

This is the second time I've run across a Powerpuff Girls hentai
dojinshi, the first time being on J-List.

It's no easier to take now than then.

Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...

FW

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 12:06:06 AM11/11/02
to
"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
news:aqn4pq$18p5$1...@news.fsr.net...

> david.old...@rogers.com says...
> >
> > I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably disturbs
> >more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go with hentai" category.
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813
>
> This is the second time I've run across a Powerpuff Girls hentai
> dojinshi, the first time being on J-List.
> It's no easier to take now than then.
> Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
> hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...

How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>

Catherine Johnson.
--
dis "able" to reply

"I never know," Harry called to Hagrid over the noise of the cart, "what's
the difference between a stalagmite and a stalactite?"
"Stalagmite's got an 'm' in it," said Hagrid.
-_Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone_.


Metlhd3138

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 12:38:10 AM11/11/02
to
>Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
>hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...

I've seen simpsons hentai,,trust me,,you NEVER,,EVER want to see that. Lets
just say it makes CB hentai look classy by comparison.

Ethan Hammond

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 1:04:42 AM11/11/02
to
Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
>
> "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
> news:aqn4pq$18p5$1...@news.fsr.net..
>
> > david.old...@rogers.com says...
> > >
> > > I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably disturbs
> > >more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go with hentai" category.
> > >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813
> >
> > This is the second time I've run across a Powerpuff Girls hentai
> > dojinshi, the first time being on J-List.
> > It's no easier to take now than then.
> > Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
> > hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...
>
> How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>

What the Chamber of Secrets isn't hidden in Hermanie's panties?

Chuck Stewart

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 6:51:33 AM11/11/02
to
"Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in
news:2VGz9.486697$o.67...@news1.west.cox.net:

> "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote:

>> Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
>> hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...

> How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>

"Harry Potter And The Catgirls Of Gor"... :)

> Catherine Johnson.

--
Chuck Stewart

"Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?"

Frank White

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 9:06:28 AM11/11/02
to
In article <3DCF48...@worldnet.att.net>, esha...@worldnet.att.net
says...

You misspelled Draco Malfoy, there.

(VEG>

FW

S.t.A.n.L.e.E

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 11:03:44 AM11/11/02
to

Well, people can understand Card Captor.
Even CLAMP isn't exactly one who shames from portraying them sexually.
But PPG... geez, they don't even have features or fingers!

Adam Haun

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 12:59:15 PM11/11/02
to
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:03:44 -0500, "S.t.A.n.L.e.E"
<sta...@cif.rochester.edu> wrote:

>Well, people can understand Card Captor.
>Even CLAMP isn't exactly one who shames from portraying them sexually.

Er...when did this happen?

>But PPG... geez, they don't even have features or fingers!

Someone stop me before I make a joke out of this. Please!

--
Adam Haun
ad...@infinity.idleplay.net

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 3:11:44 PM11/11/02
to
"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
news:aqodh4$21dp$2...@news.fsr.net...

> esha...@worldnet.att.net says...
> >Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
> >> "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote
> >>

> >> > Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
> >> > hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...
> >>
> >> How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
> >
> >What the Chamber of Secrets isn't hidden in Hermanie's panties?
>
> You misspelled Draco Malfoy, there.

GYAH! Must.. not have... impure thoughts... about underage Nazi...
Thanks a million, Frank. ~_~

Catherine Johnson.
--
dis "able" to reply

"Early to bed, early to rise, drive through the drive-thru and get me some
fries."
-The Narrator, during an eyecatch for _Cartoon Planet_.

Arthur Levesque

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 3:29:29 PM11/11/02
to
Catherine>How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>

Ethan>What the Chamber of Secrets isn't hidden in Hermanie's panties?

Frank>You misspelled Draco Malfoy, there.

Catherine>GYAH! Must.. not have... impure thoughts... about underage
Catherine>Nazi... Thanks a million, Frank. ~_~

The age of consent in the United Kingdom (except for Northern Ireland)
is 16 (and, as of last year, that includes male homosexuals); so, it merely
depends upon when in the timeline you set your hypothetical hentai. Won't
Harry and Malfoy be 16 in the fifth book (which is *finally* complete, and
should hit in the bookstores in April or so)?
--
/\ Arthur Levesque <fnord?> http://boog.org & http://DammitJa.net __
\B\ack King of the Potato People & shanana-Cobain <*> Urban Spaceman (oO)
\S\lash Sweet transvestite and member of a vast right-wing conspiracy /||\
\/ I was a lesbian before it was fashionable! My work here is done...

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 3:44:49 PM11/11/02
to
"Arthur Levesque" <meist...@boog.org> wrote in message
news:aqp3v9$cabmq$1...@ID-75701.news.dfncis.de...

> Catherine>How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
> Ethan>What the Chamber of Secrets isn't hidden in Hermanie's panties?
> Frank>You misspelled Draco Malfoy, there.
>
> Catherine>GYAH! Must.. not have... impure thoughts... about underage
> Catherine>Nazi... Thanks a million, Frank. ~_~
>
> The age of consent in the United Kingdom (except for Northern
Ireland)
> is 16 (and, as of last year, that includes male homosexuals); so, it
merely
> depends upon when in the timeline you set your hypothetical hentai.
Won't
> Harry and Malfoy be 16 in the fifth book (which is *finally* complete,
and
> should hit in the bookstores in April or so)?

Not quite. It's simple, really: Whichever year they are, add ten. They
were 11 their 1st year, 12 their second, etc. They'll be 15 in the
upcoming _HP and the Order of the Phoenix_.
But, yes the aoc is 16 in Britain, so they'll be legal by the 6th book. ^_^

Catherine Johnson.
--
dis "able" to reply

Frank White

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 6:04:11 PM11/11/02
to
In article <2VGz9.486697$o.67...@news1.west.cox.net>,
cath...@feablenm.net says...

>
>"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
>news:aqn4pq$18p5$1...@news.fsr.net...
>
>> david.old...@rogers.com says...
>> >
>> > I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably disturbs
>> >more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go with hentai" category.
>> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813
>>
>> This is the second time I've run across a Powerpuff Girls hentai
>> dojinshi, the first time being on J-List.
>> It's no easier to take now than then.
>> Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
>> hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...
>
>How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>

I'm of two minds on that. On the one hand, Rowling herself
has introduced sexual attraction and the beginnings of the
bubbling froth of adolescent hormonal overdrive into the
stories, so it's not exactly out of left field. On the
other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not
little adults - and it's a bit much to see see/read them
having sex like practiced porn stars.

FW

grizzbob

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 8:04:03 PM11/11/02
to

"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
news:aqn4pq$18p5$1...@news.fsr.net...
Actually, what I find most disturbing is that someone has already bid up to
$102 for it....


Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 9:54:42 PM11/11/02
to
"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
news:aqpd1b$2onj$2...@news.fsr.net...


> cath...@feablenm.net says...


> >"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote:
> >> david.old...@rogers.com says...
> >> >
> >> >I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably
> >> >disturbs more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go
> >> >with hentai" category.
> >> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813
> >>
> >> This is the second time I've run across a Powerpuff Girls hentai
> >> dojinshi, the first time being on J-List.
> >> It's no easier to take now than then.
> >> Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
> >> hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...
> >
> >How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
>
> I'm of two minds on that.

Actually, I was making a joke about that "sick, disguting" picture someone
linked to on afhp. You know, the one oif Hermione that shows absolutely
NOTHING and that, while mild titillating, could be shown in a church
without raising an eyebrow.

> On the one hand, Rowling herself has introduced sexual
> attraction and the beginnings of the bubbling froth of
> adolescent hormonal overdrive into the stories, so it's not
> exactly out of left field.

Yeah. ^_^
Poor Harry in the bath.. <snicker>

> On the other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
> depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not little
> adults - and it's a bit much to see see/read them having sex like
> practiced porn stars.

Yeah...
If I ever wrote HP hentai, I'd make the characters older (the aoc is 16 in
England, so the'd be at least that old), and as you say, treat them age
appropriately and portray them with the er... correct amount of
inexpertise/nervousness/etc.

The Skeleton Man

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 10:28:37 PM11/11/02
to

"RPManny" <rpm...@sprynet.com> wrote in message
news:aqlsbm$b2d$1...@slb6.atl.mindspring.net...

I don't see what the big deal is. While I might take offense at the concept
of some artist doing that with someone elses characters (which I'm sure the
creator didn't authorize) I don't see how anything that badly drawn could be
looked at as anything but stupid.

--
Skeleton Man

Is it time I was hypnotized?


Ethan Hammond

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 11:50:56 PM11/11/02
to
Chuck Stewart wrote:
>
> "Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in
> news:2VGz9.486697$o.67...@news1.west.cox.net:
>
> > "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote:
>
> >> Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
> >> hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...
>
> > How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
>
> "Harry Potter And The Catgirls Of Gor"... :)

Wai neko musume da yoh huwway huwway!!!!

Ethan Hammond

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 11:51:03 PM11/11/02
to
Frank White wrote:
>
> In article <3DCF48...@worldnet.att.net>, esha...@worldnet.att.net
> says...
> >
> >Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
> >>
> >> "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
> >> news:aqn4pq$18p5$1...@news.fsr.net.
> >>
> >> > david.old...@rogers.com says...
> >> > >
> >> > > I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably
> disturbs
> >> > >more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go with hentai"
> category.
> >> > >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813
> >> >
> >> > This is the second time I've run across a Powerpuff Girls hentai
> >> > dojinshi, the first time being on J-List.
> >> > It's no easier to take now than then.
> >> > Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
> >> > hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...
> >>
> >> How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
> >
> >What the Chamber of Secrets isn't hidden in Hermanie's panties?
>
> You misspelled Draco Malfoy, there.
>
> (VEG>

Is that the blonde guy with the slicked back hair? I have only
seen the movie, don't care to read the book.

S.t.A.n.L.e.E

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 2:02:44 AM11/12/02
to
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Adam Haun wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:03:44 -0500, "S.t.A.n.L.e.E"
> <sta...@cif.rochester.edu> wrote:
>
> >Well, people can understand Card Captor.
> >Even CLAMP isn't exactly one who shames from portraying them sexually.
>
> Er...when did this happen?
>

Oh come now.
The provocative costumes "Tomoyo" have Sakura sometimes wear,
like the one with the Watery Card ep.
Or the characterizations, how Tomoyo acts around Sakura, etc.
And how "Kero" goes over Sakura's poses in Kero-chan's checks.
Look at some of the manga sketches.
Who do you think decides all this? Tomoyo? Kero?

This is CLAMP, after all.
You do remember who makes them up and their portfolio, right?
Why would anyone be surprised?
I think one of the main reasons people like CLAMP
is how they depict their characters to be sexually appealing.
So why deny it now? It's not like age would deter CLAMP.
They're no saints... er, nuns.

> >But PPG... geez, they don't even have features or fingers!
>
> Someone stop me before I make a joke out of this. Please!
>

Go for it! ^_^

Klyfix

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 3:56:44 AM11/12/02
to
In article <Xns92C3453523E...@130.133.1.4>, Chuck Stewart
<zapk...@gmx.co.uk> writes:

>
>"Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in
>news:2VGz9.486697$o.67...@news1.west.cox.net:
>
>> "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote:
>
>>> Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
>>> hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...
>
>> How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
>
>"Harry Potter And The Catgirls Of Gor"... :)
>

Hmm....

Should I manage to get to the Boston Arisia SF Con next year and
should John Norman show up again (he was at at least two previous
ones) maybe I should suggest it to him.

Umm, or not.....

V. S. Greene : kly...@aol.com : Boston, near Arkham...
Eckzylon: http://m1.aol.com/klyfix/eckzylon.html
A rodent with mad skillz, uh, no.

Frank White

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 9:13:01 AM11/12/02
to
In article <S3_z9.995$Ay3.1...@news1.west.cox.net>, cath...@feablenm.net
says...
>
>"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
>news:aqpd1b$2onj$2...@news.fsr.net...
>
>
>> cath...@feablenm.net says...
>> >"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote:
>> >> david.old...@rogers.com says...
>> >> >
>> >> >I found this E-Bay link mentioned elsewhere. This probably
>> >> >disturbs more than it surprises, from the "what doesn't go
>> >> >with hentai" category.
>> >> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=732480813
>> >>
>> >> This is the second time I've run across a Powerpuff Girls hentai
>> >> dojinshi, the first time being on J-List.
>> >> It's no easier to take now than then.
>> >> Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
>> >> hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...
>> >
>> >How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
>>
>> I'm of two minds on that.
>
>Actually, I was making a joke about that "sick, disguting" picture someone
>linked to on afhp. You know, the one oif Hermione that shows absolutely
>NOTHING and that, while mild titillating, could be shown in a church
>without raising an eyebrow.

The left thigh was drawn wrong.

Aside from that, she could have been a Sailor Senshi for all
the picture showed.

>> On the one hand, Rowling herself has introduced sexual
>> attraction and the beginnings of the bubbling froth of
>> adolescent hormonal overdrive into the stories, so it's not
>> exactly out of left field.
>
>Yeah. ^_^
>Poor Harry in the bath.. <snicker>

That was an unexpected aspect of Myrtle.

(I'm suprised people don't want to talk to Myrtle. While
she's not the happiest of personalities, she is the same
mental age as the students and more approachable than
your average ghost, so you'd think the pupils would be
interested in finding out things like what it's like to
be a ghost, what happens after you die, etc.)

>> On the other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
>> depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not little
>> adults - and it's a bit much to see see/read them having sex like
>> practiced porn stars.
>
>Yeah...
>If I ever wrote HP hentai, I'd make the characters older (the aoc is 16 in
>England, so the'd be at least that old), and as you say, treat them age
>appropriately and portray them with the er... correct amount of
>inexpertise/nervousness/etc.

Hear, hear.

FW

Chris Kern

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 9:27:00 AM11/12/02
to
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 01:04:03 GMT, "grizzbob" <griz...@cox.net> posted
the following:

>Actually, what I find most disturbing is that someone has already bid up to
>$102 for it....

I would assume (hope!) that the person buying it is just buying it for
curiosity, novelty value, etc. rather than actually intending to
derive sexual pleasure from reading it.

Although $102 is a lot to pay for novelty value.

-Chris

Adam Haun

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 1:10:16 PM11/12/02
to
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 02:02:44 -0500, "S.t.A.n.L.e.E"
<sta...@cif.rochester.edu> wrote:

>On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Adam Haun wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:03:44 -0500, "S.t.A.n.L.e.E"
>> <sta...@cif.rochester.edu> wrote:
>>
>> >Well, people can understand Card Captor.
>> >Even CLAMP isn't exactly one who shames from portraying them sexually.
>>
>> Er...when did this happen?
>>
>
>Oh come now.
>The provocative costumes "Tomoyo" have Sakura sometimes wear,
>like the one with the Watery Card ep.
>Or the characterizations, how Tomoyo acts around Sakura, etc.
>And how "Kero" goes over Sakura's poses in Kero-chan's checks.
>Look at some of the manga sketches.
>Who do you think decides all this? Tomoyo? Kero?

Yeah, that's true. I was thinking more of explicit hentai stuff than
that, but I suppose you're right.

>> >But PPG... geez, they don't even have features or fingers!
>>
>> Someone stop me before I make a joke out of this. Please!
>>
>
>Go for it! ^_^

All right...don't say I didn't warn you.

"My god! The PPG...they're made of GIANT LIVING DILDOS!"

--
Adam Haun
ad...@infinity.idleplay.net

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 4:44:50 PM11/12/02
to
"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
news:aqr29d$11dg$2...@news.fsr.net...

> cath...@feablenm.net says...
> >"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote:
> >> cath...@feablenm.net says...


> >>
> >> >How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
> >>
> >> I'm of two minds on that.
> >
> >Actually, I was making a joke about that "sick, disguting" picture

> >someone linked to on afhp. You know, the one of Hermione that


> >shows absolutely NOTHING and that, while mild titillating, could
> >be shown in a church without raising an eyebrow.
>
> The left thigh was drawn wrong.

Oh, yeah! The horror!

> Aside from that, she could have been a Sailor Senshi for all
> the picture showed.

No... she was much better covered then that.

> >> On the one hand, Rowling herself has introduced sexual
> >> attraction and the beginnings of the bubbling froth of
> >> adolescent hormonal overdrive into the stories, so it's not
> >> exactly out of left field.
> >
> >Yeah. ^_^
> >Poor Harry in the bath.. <snicker>
>
> That was an unexpected aspect of Myrtle.

Indeed. And she says she "sometimes" comes to spy on the prefects in the
bath. Myrtle no hentai!

> (I'm suprised people don't want to talk to Myrtle. While
> she's not the happiest of personalities, she is the same
> mental age as the students and more approachable than
> your average ghost,

Nearless Headless Nick seems pretty cool actually. Peeves, OTOH... O_O

> so you'd think the pupils would be interested in finding out
> things like what it's like to be a ghost, what happens after you
> die, etc.)

Indeed. I was actually pretty annoyed with Harry in that scene.. He hems
and haws about not visiting her when he said he would. Then, when he
leaves, she asks if he'll come back, and he says, "Er, I'll try..." Oh you
will not, you little fibber...
As much as I like Harry, he's not above lying and breaking rules when it
suits him, even if it hurts other people...

> >> On the other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
> >> depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not little
> >> adults - and it's a bit much to see see/read them having sex like
> >> practiced porn stars.
> >
> >Yeah...
> >If I ever wrote HP hentai, I'd make the characters older (the aoc is
> >16 in England, so the'd be at least that old), and as you say, treat
> >them age appropriately and portray them with the er... correct amount
> > of inexpertise/nervousness/etc.
>
> Hear, hear.

^_^v

S.t.A.n.L.e.E

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 8:20:23 AM11/13/02
to
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Adam Haun wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 02:02:44 -0500, "S.t.A.n.L.e.E"
> <sta...@cif.rochester.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> >Oh come now.
> >The provocative costumes "Tomoyo" have Sakura sometimes wear,
> >like the one with the Watery Card ep.
> >Or the characterizations, how Tomoyo acts around Sakura, etc.
> >And how "Kero" goes over Sakura's poses in Kero-chan's checks.
> >Look at some of the manga sketches.
> >Who do you think decides all this? Tomoyo? Kero?
>
> Yeah, that's true. I was thinking more of explicit hentai stuff than
> that, but I suppose you're right.

C'mon! Anime is full of it! You can't miss it! ^_^

> >> >But PPG... geez, they don't even have features or fingers!
> >>
> >> Someone stop me before I make a joke out of this. Please!
> >>
> >
> >Go for it! ^_^
>
> All right...don't say I didn't warn you.
>
> "My god! The PPG...they're made of GIANT LIVING DILDOS!"
>

Heheheheh... too bad I heard that particular one before. ;-)

paranormalized

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 8:22:43 PM11/13/02
to
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 04:51:03 GMT, Ethan Hammond
<esha...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

*snip snip*


>> >> How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
>> >
>> >What the Chamber of Secrets isn't hidden in Hermanie's panties?
>>
>> You misspelled Draco Malfoy, there.
>>
>> (VEG>
>
>Is that the blonde guy with the slicked back hair? I have only
>seen the movie, don't care to read the book.

Well, my oldest sister thought the movie kept the facts of the plot,
but missed the emotional content. Didn't go see it myself, but the
novels were very cool. Think children's fanservice for the movie,
which it undoubtably suceeded at with special effects and such. Not
all fanservice is sexual, you know...

Why the heck did you see a movie to judge a novel? It doesn't usually
work that way, you know. Just skim the first few chapters at a
bookstore for a half-hour, or check the whole thing out from the
library. They are *great* children's novels, though if that isn't
your thing, that isn't your thing. But stop it with the movie
comparison, okay?


Jonathan Fisher
wondering if pointing out Dash as the definitive authority on N^2 in
retaliation is unfair, since it *did* change plot and stuffs...
----------
paranormalized man, subnormalized otaku

ROT13 and then delete all instances of the letter after P to email

Hand-of-Omega

unread,
Nov 14, 2002, 11:25:06 PM11/14/02
to
Ethan Hammond <esha...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<3DD086...@worldnet.att.net>...

> Chuck Stewart wrote:
> >
> > "Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in
> > news:2VGz9.486697$o.67...@news1.west.cox.net:
> >
> > > "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote:
>
> > >> Powerpuff Girls hentai. Card Captor hentai. Azumanga Daioh
> > >> hentai. These are things that are just so... wrong...
>
> > > How about Harry Potter hentai? <evil grin>
> >
> > "Harry Potter And The Catgirls Of Gor"... :)
>
> Wai neko musume da yoh huwway huwway!!!!


Then you should *really* like Chamber of Secrets!!

Dex,
who isn't going to spoil the catgirlish details...^__^

Hand-of-Omega

unread,
Nov 14, 2002, 11:38:30 PM11/14/02
to
"Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in message news:<mDeA9.3238$Ay3.3...@news1.west.cox.net>...

> "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
> news:aqr29d$11dg$2...@news.fsr.net...
> > > >> On the one hand, Rowling herself has introduced sexual
> > >> attraction and the beginnings of the bubbling froth of
> > >> adolescent hormonal overdrive into the stories, so it's not
> > >> exactly out of left field.
> > >
> > >Yeah. ^_^
> > >Poor Harry in the bath.. <snicker>
> >
> > That was an unexpected aspect of Myrtle.
>
> Indeed. And she says she "sometimes" comes to spy on the prefects in the
> bath. Myrtle no hentai!
>
Except that Myrtle shouldn't *have* hormones...^^

> > (I'm suprised people don't want to talk to Myrtle. While
> > she's not the happiest of personalities, she is the same
> > mental age as the students and more approachable than
> > your average ghost,
>
> Nearless Headless Nick seems pretty cool actually. Peeves, OTOH... O_O
>
> > so you'd think the pupils would be interested in finding out
> > things like what it's like to be a ghost, what happens after you
> > die, etc.)
>
> Indeed.

You think kids would be interested in confirming the facts of
mortality?! To say nothing of the idea that you might end up like
*her*...I can completely see why she's avoided. Hell, I know *living*
people like that who are avoided!

BTW, is it ever stated what causes some people to become ghosts and
not others? Loved the bit with the Professor who died preparing for a
class...and just left his body behind and continued teaching as
normal!^^

> I was actually pretty annoyed with Harry in that scene.. He hems
> and haws about not visiting her when he said he would. Then, when he
> leaves, she asks if he'll come back, and he says, "Er, I'll try..." Oh you
> will not, you little fibber...

Reminds me of the Spirograph guy on The Simpsons: "No, you won't..."^^

> As much as I like Harry, he's not above lying and breaking rules when it
> suits him, even if it hurts other people...

That *was* one of the things that I liked about him: that instead of
being this goody-two-shoes like I thought, he definitely has no
problem with the "grayer" side of being a kid. The one cut I hated in
the movie was the original version of Snape's first potions class,
where Harry gives back as good as he gets...whereas in the version
they used, he just sits there and takes it like a lump.>_<

I also liked when the kids try to make rum in the cafeteria; well,
what do you *think* kids will do with magic?! I can't wait for them to
start conjuring porn...^_~


>
> > >> On the other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
> > >> depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not little
> > >> adults -

Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^


> > >Yeah...
> > >If I ever wrote HP hentai, I'd make the characters older (the aoc is
> > >16 in England, so the'd be at least that old), and as you say, treat
> > >them age appropriately and portray them with the er... correct amount
> > > of inexpertise/nervousness/etc.
> >
> > Hear, hear.
>
> ^_^v
>

So, when and where can I read it?^^ Incidentally, who's the more
likely couple Harry and Draco or Harry and Ron?

Dex,
trying to get images of Harry and Neville out of his head...^^;;;

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 1:19:27 AM11/15/02
to
"Hand-of-Omega" <smili...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:27420f11.0211...@posting.google.com...

> "Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote:
> > "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote


> >
> > > >Yeah. ^_^
> > > >Poor Harry in the bath.. <snicker>
> > >
> > > That was an unexpected aspect of Myrtle.
> >
> > Indeed. And she says she "sometimes" comes to spy on the prefects
> > in the bath. Myrtle no hentai!
>
> Except that Myrtle shouldn't *have* hormones...^^

Ghosts in the HP-verse seems to act pretty much like living people. Myrtle
is probably 14-16, which means she was old enough to have "hormones" when
she was alive. So I don't see the problem.

> > > so you'd think the pupils would be interested in finding out
> > > things like what it's like to be a ghost, what happens after
> > > you die, etc.)
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> You think kids would be interested in confirming the facts of
> mortality?!

Hmm. Good point.

> To say nothing of the idea that you might end up like *her*...I
> can completely see why she's avoided. Hell, I know *living*
> people like that who are avoided!

Well, that was kinda the problem.. She apparently had a pretty hard time
of it when she was alive, too.

> BTW, is it ever stated what causes some people to become ghosts
> and not others?

No. Some people on afhp theorize that only wizards and witches can become
ghosts (as opposed to non-magical people, aka Muggles) but I don't think
we've seen enough evidence either way.

> Loved the bit with the Professor who died preparing for a
> class...and just left his body behind and continued teaching
> as normal!^^

Professor Binn!

> > I was actually pretty annoyed with Harry in that scene.. He hems
> > and haws about not visiting her when he said he would. Then,
> > when he leaves, she asks if he'll come back, and he says, "Er, I'll
> > try..." Oh you will not, you little fibber...
>
> Reminds me of the Spirograph guy on The Simpsons: "No, you won't..."^^

LOL! I'm surprised she didn't say that...

> > As much as I like Harry, he's not above lying and breaking rules
> > when it suits him, even if it hurts other people...
>
> That *was* one of the things that I liked about him: that instead
> of being this goody-two-shoes like I thought, he definitely has no
> problem with the "grayer" side of being a kid.

Hmmm. This is true.

> The one cut I hated in the movie was the original version of Snape's
first
> potions class, where Harry gives back as good as he gets...whereas in
> the version they used, he just sits there and takes it like a lump.>_<

I LOVE the extended version of that scene! And not just for what you
said.. Rickman's acting when he comes up and answers the quesitons.. "Why
aren't all of you *writing this down*???" I really wish they would have
kept the whole scene.

> I also liked when the kids try to make rum in the cafeteria; well,
> what do you *think* kids will do with magic?! I can't wait for them to
> start conjuring porn...^_~

Indeed. And let's not even get into the fun you can have with an
Invisibility Cloak... ^_^

> > > >> On the other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
> > > >> depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not little
> > > >> adults -
>
> Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^

Don't know them well enough. Here's kind of a simplified guide:
The brave go to Gryffindor
The determined go to Hufflepuff
The smart go to Ravenclaw
And the ruthless end up in Slytherin

> > > >If I ever wrote HP hentai, I'd make the characters older (the aoc is

> > > >16 in England, so they'd be at least that old), and as you say,


treat
> > > >them age appropriately and portray them with the er... correct
amount
> > > > of inexpertise/nervousness/etc.
> > >
> > > Hear, hear.
> >
> > ^_^v
> >
> So, when and where can I read it?^^

Heh...

> Incidentally, who's the more likely couple Harry and Draco or Harry and
Ron?

Ok, I'm only gonna say this once: ANYONE who writes Harry/Draco needs to
go back and READ THE FUCKING BOOKS. These two HATE each other. And it's
not that "they really love each other" shit... they really, really hate
each other. I can't see those two getting together unless they're both
under an Imperius Curse. And since those don't work on Harry...

> Dex,
> trying to get images of Harry and Neville out of his head...^^;;;

Oh, I dunno... ^_^

Catherine Johnson, who believes there's more to Neville than meets the eye.


--
dis "able" to reply

"The Pony Express--when it absolutely, positively has to be there in three
or four months or so."
-Tom Servo, _Mystery Science Theater 3000_.


D B Malmquist

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 2:18:39 AM11/15/02
to
Fish Eye no Miko wrote:

> > > > >> On the other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
> > > > >> depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not little
> > > > >> adults -
> >
> > Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^
>
> Don't know them well enough. Here's kind of a simplified guide:
> The brave go to Gryffindor
> The determined go to Hufflepuff
> The smart go to Ravenclaw
> And the ruthless end up in Slytherin

What about the people who are nondescript? Average? Lazy and
unambitious?

Anyway, how about:

Chiyo - Ravenclaw.
Sakaki - Ravenclaw? Gryffindor?
Yomi - Hufflepuff. (I think she works really hard and is fairly
smart but not brilliant.)
Kagura - Hufflepuff.
Kaorin - Hufflepuff.
Tomo - Slytherin. (OK maybe I'm being mean.)
Osaka - Gryffindor. She's totally fearless.

Alternatively they could all end up in Gryffindor except Kaorin
who is clearly not gonna end up with Sakaki.

- dbm

8-Bit Star

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 2:41:56 AM11/15/02
to

Fish Eye no Miko wrote:

> "Hand-of-Omega" <smili...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:27420f11.0211...@posting.google.com...
>
>

> > BTW, is it ever stated what causes some people to become ghosts
> > and not others?
>
> No. Some people on afhp theorize that only wizards and witches can become
> ghosts (as opposed to non-magical people, aka Muggles) but I don't think
> we've seen enough evidence either way.

Supposedly a later book in the series is going to explain this.

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 3:49:47 AM11/15/02
to
"D B Malmquist" <d.b.ma...@com.swap-com-and-rcn.rcn> wrote in message
news:3DD4A395...@com.swap-com-and-rcn.rcn...

> Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^
> >
> > Don't know them well enough. Here's kind of a simplified guide:
> > The brave go to Gryffindor
> > The determined go to Hufflepuff
> > The smart go to Ravenclaw
> > And the ruthless end up in Slytherin
>
> What about the people who are nondescript? Average? Lazy
> and unambitious?

Good question... Neville Longbottom's a Gryffindor, and he's kinda.. a
loser (his spells never work, he's kinda a screw-up, etc). OTOH, there
have been hints that there's more to him than meets the eye. His parents
were killed, and some fans think he might have been put under a Memory
Charm (ie, a spell that makes you forget certain things). There's another
character who had that happened and become a screw-up too (before the
baddie killed her, anyway).
I'm rambling, sorry. Point is, even though Neville's a screw up, the
Sorting Hat (don't ask) might have seen his potent anyway and sorted him
accordingly. And maybe in the case of the people you're talking about,
that could happen, too.

> Anyway, how about:
>
> Chiyo - Ravenclaw.
> Sakaki - Ravenclaw? Gryffindor?
> Yomi - Hufflepuff. (I think she works really hard and is fairly
> smart but not brilliant.)

Definitely a Hufflepuff.

> Kagura - Hufflepuff.
> Kaorin - Hufflepuff.
> Tomo - Slytherin. (OK maybe I'm being mean.)

Well, if this person is evil, that fits. ^_^

> Osaka - Gryffindor. She's totally fearless.
>
> Alternatively they could all end up in Gryffindor except Kaorin
> who is clearly not gonna end up with Sakaki.

They could still be in the same House... ^_^

Catherine Johnson.


--
dis "able" to reply

"There's a bald guy in a wheelchair waiting outside the delivery room to
talk to you."
-One of the Signs Your Baby Might Be a Mutant, from TopFive.com.


Galen Musbach

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 4:39:00 AM11/15/02
to
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:18:39 GMT, D B Malmquist
<d.b.ma...@com.swap-com-and-rcn.rcn> wrote:

>Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
>
>> > > > >> On the other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
>> > > > >> depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not little
>> > > > >> adults -
>> >
>> > Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^
>>
>> Don't know them well enough. Here's kind of a simplified guide:
>> The brave go to Gryffindor
>> The determined go to Hufflepuff
>> The smart go to Ravenclaw
>> And the ruthless end up in Slytherin
>
>What about the people who are nondescript? Average? Lazy and
>unambitious?
>
>Anyway, how about:
>
>Chiyo - Ravenclaw.
>Sakaki - Ravenclaw? Gryffindor?

Gryffindor. She never backs back down from the challenge
of the woman-eating cat.

>Yomi - Hufflepuff. (I think she works really hard and is fairly
> smart but not brilliant.)
>Kagura - Hufflepuff.
>Kaorin - Hufflepuff.
>Tomo - Slytherin. (OK maybe I'm being mean.)
>Osaka - Gryffindor. She's totally fearless.

Otherwise, I agree.
-Galen

(snip)
>- dbm

The Eternal Lost Lurker (tomato o suki kaaaaaaa?)

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 4:52:51 AM11/15/02
to

"Hand-of-Omega" <smili...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:27420f11.0211...@posting.google.com...
>
> Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^

Sakaki: Ravenclaw
Chiyo: Gryffindor
Yomi: Ravenclaw
Tomo: ...ummm.....
Osaka: Hufflepuff
Kaorin: Hufflepuff
Kagura: ...ummm.....


--
_____________________________
I wonder why coffee tastes so good
when you're naked with your family.
_____________________________
[Chiyo] "Ah! This is my cute vibrator!"
[Osaka] "Ah! That's a cute vibrator!"
[Sakaki] "....cute vibrator..."
_____________________________
* The Eternal Lost Lurker
http://www.lurkerdrome.com
_____________________________

Hand-of-Omega

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 11:23:05 AM11/15/02
to
D B Malmquist <d.b.ma...@com.swap-com-and-rcn.rcn> wrote in message news:<3DD4A395...@com.swap-com-and-rcn.rcn>...

> Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
>

> > > Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^
> >
> > Don't know them well enough. Here's kind of a simplified guide:
> > The brave go to Gryffindor
> > The determined go to Hufflepuff
> > The smart go to Ravenclaw
> > And the ruthless end up in Slytherin
>
> What about the people who are nondescript? Average? Lazy and
> unambitious?
>

Stupid?^^



> Anyway, how about:
>
> Chiyo - Ravenclaw.

Agreed.

> Sakaki - Ravenclaw? Gryffindor?

Gryffindor, definitely. One has to be brave to keep trying with
Kamineko!

> Yomi - Hufflepuff. (I think she works really hard and is fairly
> smart but not brilliant.)

Good call.

> Kagura - Hufflepuff.

I'd say Slytherin, which isn't so much about ruthlessness as it is
Ambition.

> Kaorin - Hufflepuff.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if H is the largest house, since it
seems to be the answer to your above questions...A friend of mine
calls it "the Joke house".^^ ("The name says it all!")

> Tomo - Slytherin. (OK maybe I'm being mean.)

Actually, i'd agree. Don't think she'd do too well, though, as she
doesn't have any real malice in her...

> Osaka - Gryffindor. She's totally fearless.

Groundskeeper?^^ I think the Sorting Hat would self-destruct...^^


>
> Alternatively they could all end up in Gryffindor except Kaorin
> who is clearly not gonna end up with Sakaki.
>

Heh. What about the Azu-teachers? Kimura teaching Defense against the
Dark Arts? Yukari's Potions class? Not sure where Nyamo would fit
in...^_^

Dex,
wanting to see this fanfic now...

Frank White

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 1:35:52 PM11/15/02
to
In article <Tt3B9.307$Xu7.31...@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>,
ell4...@sbcglowball.net says...

>
>
>"Hand-of-Omega" <smili...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:27420f11.0211...@posting.google.com...
>>
>> Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^
>
>Sakaki: Ravenclaw
>Chiyo: Gryffindor
>Yomi: Ravenclaw
>Tomo: ...ummm.....
>Osaka: Hufflepuff
>Kaorin: Hufflepuff
>Kagura: ...ummm.....

I think they'd all wind up in Gryffindor except Osaka, who would
so befuddle the Sorting Hat she'd wind up in her own house.

FW

Frank White

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 2:09:06 PM11/15/02
to
In article <Pl0B9.13799$Ay3.1...@news1.west.cox.net>,
cath...@feablenm.net says...

>
>"Hand-of-Omega" <smili...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:27420f11.0211...@posting.google.com...
>
>> "Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote:
>> > "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote
>> >
>> > > >Yeah. ^_^
>> > > >Poor Harry in the bath.. <snicker>
>> > >
>> > > That was an unexpected aspect of Myrtle.
>> >
>> > Indeed. And she says she "sometimes" comes to spy on the prefects
>> > in the bath. Myrtle no hentai!
>>
>> Except that Myrtle shouldn't *have* hormones...^^
>
>Ghosts in the HP-verse seems to act pretty much like living people. Myrtle
>is probably 14-16, which means she was old enough to have "hormones" when
>she was alive. So I don't see the problem.

It would probably be more of a mindset than a biological urge...

It's kind of sadly innocent to think of Myrtle peeping at the
boy prefects as they're bathing. I mean, it's not as if she's
ever going to have the ability to do more than peep.

>> > > so you'd think the pupils would be interested in finding out
>> > > things like what it's like to be a ghost, what happens after
>> > > you die, etc.)
>> >
>> > Indeed.
>>
>> You think kids would be interested in confirming the facts of
>> mortality?!
>
>Hmm. Good point.

Some kids would be interested.

Tom Riddle would have been.

>> To say nothing of the idea that you might end up like *her*...I
>> can completely see why she's avoided. Hell, I know *living*
>> people like that who are avoided!
>
>Well, that was kinda the problem.. She apparently had a pretty hard time
>of it when she was alive, too.

She was the butt of lots of female bullying.

After her death, she started paying back some of her
tormentors until the Ministry of Magic forced her to
stop.

>> BTW, is it ever stated what causes some people to become ghosts
>> and not others?
>
>No. Some people on afhp theorize that only wizards and witches can become
>ghosts (as opposed to non-magical people, aka Muggles) but I don't think
>we've seen enough evidence either way.

Apparently there's got to be specific circumstances to
create a ghost. We haven't found out what those
circumstances are yet, though. A future book is supposed
to spell it out.

>> Loved the bit with the Professor who died preparing for a
>> class...and just left his body behind and continued teaching
>> as normal!^^
>
>Professor Binn!
>
>> > I was actually pretty annoyed with Harry in that scene.. He hems
>> > and haws about not visiting her when he said he would. Then,
>> > when he leaves, she asks if he'll come back, and he says, "Er, I'll
>> > try..." Oh you will not, you little fibber...
>>
>> Reminds me of the Spirograph guy on The Simpsons: "No, you won't..."^^
>
>LOL! I'm surprised she didn't say that...

It WOULD have fit Myrtle's personality...

>> > As much as I like Harry, he's not above lying and breaking rules
>> > when it suits him, even if it hurts other people...
>>
>> That *was* one of the things that I liked about him: that instead
>> of being this goody-two-shoes like I thought, he definitely has no
>> problem with the "grayer" side of being a kid.
>
>Hmmm. This is true.
>
>> The one cut I hated in the movie was the original version of Snape's
>first
>> potions class, where Harry gives back as good as he gets...whereas in
>> the version they used, he just sits there and takes it like a lump.>_<
>
>I LOVE the extended version of that scene! And not just for what you
>said.. Rickman's acting when he comes up and answers the quesitons.. "Why
>aren't all of you *writing this down*???" I really wish they would have
>kept the whole scene.
>
>> I also liked when the kids try to make rum in the cafeteria; well,
>> what do you *think* kids will do with magic?! I can't wait for them to
>> start conjuring porn...^_~
>
>Indeed. And let's not even get into the fun you can have with an
>Invisibility Cloak... ^_^

And all the rules you can break...

>> > > >> On the other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
>> > > >> depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not little
>> > > >> adults -
>>
>> Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^
>
>Don't know them well enough. Here's kind of a simplified guide:
>The brave go to Gryffindor
>The determined go to Hufflepuff
>The smart go to Ravenclaw
>And the ruthless end up in Slytherin

But this doesn't address Osaka, who is a sweet, pleasant
girl who is fearless, clueless, and - in her dreams - a
serial killer...

O_O

>> > > >If I ever wrote HP hentai, I'd make the characters older (the aoc is
>> > > >16 in England, so they'd be at least that old), and as you say,
>treat
>> > > >them age appropriately and portray them with the er... correct
>amount
>> > > > of inexpertise/nervousness/etc.
>> > >
>> > > Hear, hear.
>> >
>> > ^_^v
>> >
>> So, when and where can I read it?^^
>
>Heh...
>
>> Incidentally, who's the more likely couple Harry and Draco or Harry and
>Ron?
>
>Ok, I'm only gonna say this once: ANYONE who writes Harry/Draco needs to
>go back and READ THE FUCKING BOOKS.

Uhh... Perhaps not the more appropriate choice of words.

Or very appropriate, depending on your point of view.

>These two HATE each other. And it's
>not that "they really love each other" shit... they really, really hate
>each other.

With a passion. So to speak.

> I can't see those two getting together unless they're both
>under an Imperius Curse. And since those don't work on Harry...

At least, not for very long.

They apparently work just fine on Draco.

>> Dex,
>> trying to get images of Harry and Neville out of his head...^^;;;
>
>Oh, I dunno... ^_^
>
>Catherine Johnson, who believes there's more to Neville than meets the eye.

This is probably true. The problem is, it's hard to tell just how
much more of him there is. He shows such odd flashes of courage
and ability...

FW

David Johnston

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 3:56:22 PM11/15/02
to
D B Malmquist wrote:
>
> Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
>
> > > > > >> On the other hand, they ARE still kids - and are actually being
> > > > > >> depicted as kids, ala the Azumanga Daioh girls, and not little
> > > > > >> adults -
> > >
> > > Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^
> >
> > Don't know them well enough. Here's kind of a simplified guide:
> > The brave go to Gryffindor
> > The determined go to Hufflepuff
> > The smart go to Ravenclaw
> > And the ruthless end up in Slytherin
>
> What about the people who are nondescript? Average? Lazy and
> unambitious?

That depends. If they are lazy in a selfish kind of way
they go to Slytherin for their lack of a sense of duty.
If they are merely unambitious/lacking in self esteem,
they go to Hufflepuff.

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 6:43:52 PM11/15/02
to
"Hand-of-Omega" <smili...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:27420f11.02111...@posting.google.com...

> D B Malmquist <d.b.ma...@com.swap-com-and-rcn.rcn> wrote:
> > Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
> >
> > > > Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^
> >

> > Kagura - Hufflepuff.
>
> I'd say Slytherin, which isn't so much about ruthlessness as it is
> Ambition.

I used the term "ruthless" because it's about doing whatever you can to get
ahead. You can be ambitious and still be in Gryffindor if you've got
morals (look at Hermione).

Catherine Johnson.


--
dis "able" to reply

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 6:47:39 PM11/15/02
to
"David Johnston" <rgo...@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:3DD52C...@telusplanet.net...

I pity any lazy kid that ends up having Snape as the Head of his or her
House... O_O

> If they are merely unambitious/lacking in self esteem,
> they go to Hufflepuff.

I can't recall who's the head of Hufflepuff...

Catherine Johnson.


--
dis "able" to reply

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 7:00:37 PM11/15/02
to
"Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote in message
news:ar3goi$115p$8...@news.fsr.net...


> cath...@feablenm.net says...


> >"Hand-of-Omega" <smili...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> "Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote:
> >> > "Frank White" <fwhite*NOSPAM*@colfax.com> wrote
> >> >

> >> Except that Myrtle shouldn't *have* hormones...^^
> >
> >Ghosts in the HP-verse seems to act pretty much like living people.
> >Myrtle is probably 14-16, which means she was old enough to
> >have "hormones" when she was alive. So I don't see the problem.
>
> It would probably be more of a mindset than a biological urge...

True.

> It's kind of sadly innocent to think of Myrtle peeping at the
> boy prefects as they're bathing. I mean, it's not as if she's
> ever going to have the ability to do more than peep.

Yeah.. <sniff> Poor miserable, moping, moaning Myrtle...

> >> > > so you'd think the pupils would be interested in finding out
> >> > > things like what it's like to be a ghost, what happens after
> >> > > you die, etc.)
> >> >
> >> > Indeed.
> >>
> >> You think kids would be interested in confirming the facts of
> >> mortality?!
> >
> >Hmm. Good point.
>
> Some kids would be interested.
>
> Tom Riddle would have been.

True!
Btw, "Voldemort" apparently means "runs/flees from death"... Seeing as
he's trying to gain immortality, that seems pretty fitting.

> >> To say nothing of the idea that you might end up like *her*...I
> >> can completely see why she's avoided. Hell, I know *living*
> >> people like that who are avoided!
> >
> >Well, that was kinda the problem.. She apparently had a pretty
> >hard time of it when she was alive, too.
>
> She was the butt of lots of female bullying.

Now I'm picturing the beginning of _Carrie_.. ~_~

> After her death, she started paying back some of her
> tormentors until the Ministry of Magic forced her to
> stop.

Hmm... Ok.

> >> BTW, is it ever stated what causes some people to become
> >> ghosts and not others?
> >
> >No. Some people on afhp theorize that only wizards and witches can
> >become ghosts (as opposed to non-magical people, aka Muggles) but
> >I don't think we've seen enough evidence either way.
>
> Apparently there's got to be specific circumstances to
> create a ghost. We haven't found out what those
> circumstances are yet, though. A future book is supposed
> to spell it out.

Ok. Cool.

> >> > I was actually pretty annoyed with Harry in that scene.. He
> >> > hems and haws about not visiting her when he said he would.
> >> > Then, when he leaves, she asks if he'll come back, and he says,
> >> > "Er, I'll try..." Oh you will not, you little fibber...
> >>
> >> Reminds me of the Spirograph guy on The Simpsons: "No, you won't..."^^
> >
> >LOL! I'm surprised she didn't say that...
>
> It WOULD have fit Myrtle's personality...

Indeed!
It's kind of a vicious cycle.. She's unpleasant, so no one wants to visit
her, and that make her MORE depressed and unpleasant to be around...
Of course, it doesn't help that Harry can be kind of quick to judge and
pretty slow to forgive and/or forget.

> >> I also liked when the kids try to make rum in the cafeteria; well,
> >> what do you *think* kids will do with magic?! I can't wait for them to
> >> start conjuring porn...^_~
> >
> >Indeed. And let's not even get into the fun you can have with an
> >Invisibility Cloak... ^_^
>
> And all the rules you can break...

But Harry would NEVER do that, would he?

> >> Hmm...which Houses would the Azu-girls end up in?^__^
> >
> >Don't know them well enough. Here's kind of a simplified guide:
> >The brave go to Gryffindor
> >The determined go to Hufflepuff
> >The smart go to Ravenclaw
> >And the ruthless end up in Slytherin
>
> But this doesn't address Osaka, who is a sweet, pleasant
> girl who is fearless, clueless, and - in her dreams - a
> serial killer...
> O_O

O_O indeed.

> >> Incidentally, who's the more likely couple Harry and Draco or Harry
> >> and Ron?
> >
> >Ok, I'm only gonna say this once: ANYONE who writes Harry/Draco
> >needs to go back and READ THE FUCKING BOOKS.
>
> Uhh... Perhaps not the more appropriate choice of words.

Sorry...
But I see this a lot, and not just with Harry and Draco. I see it with Van
and Dilandau, and Zim and Dib... And there's probably lots of others.
It's just annoying. Sometimes characters who seem to hate each other
actually really *do* hate each other. d-:
Oh, and I'm not sure about Harry and Ron, either. One reason I don't see
myself doing HP slash is that I can't think of any couples I like or that
would fit...

> Or very appropriate, depending on your point of view.

d-:

> >These two HATE each other. And it's not that "they really love each
> >other" shit... they really, really hate each other.
>
> With a passion. So to speak.

You're not helping...

> > I can't see those two getting together unless they're both
> >under an Imperius Curse. And since those don't work on
> >Harry...
>
> At least, not for very long.

Well, yeah.

> They apparently work just fine on Draco.

How do we knew that?

> >Catherine Johnson, who believes there's more to Neville than
> >meets the eye.
>
> This is probably true. The problem is, it's hard to tell just how
> much more of him there is. He shows such odd flashes of courage
> and ability...

Exactly.

Catherine Johnson.


--
dis "able" to reply

"Our lives are different from other peoples'."
-Oz, _Buffy, the Vampire Slayer_


Frank White

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 7:49:40 PM11/15/02
to
In article <vIfB9.18950$Ay3.1...@news1.west.cox.net>,
cath...@feablenm.net says...

>
>"David Johnston" <rgo...@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
>news:3DD52C...@telusplanet.net...
>
>> D B Malmquist wrote:
>> >
>> > Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
>> >
>> > > Don't know them well enough. Here's kind of a simplified guide:
>> > > The brave go to Gryffindor
>> > > The determined go to Hufflepuff
>> > > The smart go to Ravenclaw
>> > > And the ruthless end up in Slytherin
>> >
>> > What about the people who are nondescript? Average? Lazy
>> > and unambitious?
>>
>> That depends. If they are lazy in a selfish kind of way
>> they go to Slytherin for their lack of a sense of duty.
>
>I pity any lazy kid that ends up having Snape as the Head of his or her
>House... O_O
>
>> If they are merely unambitious/lacking in self esteem,
>> they go to Hufflepuff.
>
>I can't recall who's the head of Hufflepuff...

Prof. Sprout, the Biology teacher

(Rowling loves playing with words...)

FW

Kirei

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 8:09:53 PM11/15/02
to

>> >> Incidentally, who's the more likely couple Harry and Draco or Harry
>> >> and Ron?
>> >
>> >Ok, I'm only gonna say this once: ANYONE who writes Harry/Draco
>> >needs to go back and READ THE FUCKING BOOKS.
>>
>> Uhh... Perhaps not the more appropriate choice of words.
>
>Sorry...
>But I see this a lot, and not just with Harry and Draco. I see it with Van
>and Dilandau, and Zim and Dib... And there's probably lots of others.
>It's just annoying. Sometimes characters who seem to hate each other
>actually really *do* hate each other. d-:
>Oh, and I'm not sure about Harry and Ron, either. One reason I don't see
>myself doing HP slash is that I can't think of any couples I like or that
>would fit...

::runs past waving a Black x Lupin flag::

In general, though, I agree with you. Most HP slash couples are just -icky- to
me. O_o;; Especially stuff like Snape/Harry... ::shudder.::

I'm not really seeing Harry with anyone frankly in that sense. I mean,
slash-wise. He really obviously likes Cho, and even though that relationship
seems a little unlikely to me (particularly given the events of book 4),
there's nothing that leads me to see him as anything but straight. And even if
there -were- signs... who would he be paired with? He genuinely hates Draco,
and... well, Ron and Hermione are just really cute. ^_^;;

By the way, in case anyone didn't know this yet, JK Rowling _finally_ finished
book 5, and it should be coming out around March/April.


Kirei
AFU no Scandalous Video
Miki's Prince
UtenaCode(1.0) U:6 F:Hi++SP+++:pBR D:To->Ak--:pOA X:*:a39[AM]+ M:f"Rinbu
Revolution," "Toki ni Ai Wa," "Last Evolution"d"Fuuin Jubaku"
Wai wai!

Freezer

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 8:40:31 PM11/15/02
to
Kirei - Come on down! You're the next contestant on
rec.arts.anime.misc!

>
>>> >> Incidentally, who's the more likely couple Harry and Draco or
>>> >> Harry and Ron?
>>> >
>>> >Ok, I'm only gonna say this once: ANYONE who writes
>>> >Harry/Draco needs to go back and READ THE FUCKING BOOKS.
>>>
>>> Uhh... Perhaps not the more appropriate choice of words.
>>
>>Sorry...
>>But I see this a lot, and not just with Harry and Draco. I see it
>>with Van and Dilandau, and Zim and Dib... And there's probably
>>lots of others. It's just annoying. Sometimes characters who seem
>>to hate each other actually really *do* hate each other. d-:
>>Oh, and I'm not sure about Harry and Ron, either. One reason I
>>don't see myself doing HP slash is that I can't think of any
>>couples I like or that would fit...
>
>::runs past waving a Black x Lupin flag::
>
> In general, though, I agree with you. Most HP slash couples are
> just -icky- to me. O_o;; Especially stuff like Snape/Harry...
> ::shudder.::
>
> I'm not really seeing Harry with anyone frankly in that sense. I
> mean, slash-wise. He really obviously likes Cho, and even though
> that relationship seems a little unlikely to me (particularly
> given the events of book 4),

And especially since Cho's going to be Rowling's promised major
character casualty... (Her, Neville, or one of the Weasley twins...)

there's nothing that leads me to see
> him as anything but straight. And even if there -were- signs...
> who would he be paired with?

Neville? Hagrid?

--
(Okay, bad image! Scratch that last one!)

My name is:
____ _
/ ___| | | http://www.geocities.com/
| |__ _ __ ___ ___ ____ ___ _ __ | | mysterysciencefreezer
| __|| '__/ _ \/ _ \/_ // _ \| '__|| | (My MSTings)
| | | | __/ __/ / /| __/| | |_| http://dccmm.com
|_| |_| \___|\___||___|\___||_| (_)(Rasslin' and other subjects)

And my anti-drug is porn.

osh

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 11:06:23 PM11/15/02
to
Haripota nothing... anyone getting weird flashes of 'Peanuts' watching
Azumanga Daioh?

Osaka-Charlie's bumbling, Tomo's loudness & Yomi's seriousness (Tho those
two as Lucy & Schoeder is some image @_@), Chiyo-Linus's innocent
intellect... hmm...

Suppose that'd make Kagura and Kaorin, Patty & Marcie. Wonder how Sakaki'd
fit...

Then you have Nyamo & Yukari's antics courtesy of Snoopy & Woodstock...


The Eternal Lost Lurker (tomato o suki kaaaaaaa?)

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 11:31:06 PM11/15/02
to

"Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in message
news:FUfB9.18960$Ay3.1...@news1.west.cox.net...

>
> Yeah.. <sniff> Poor miserable, moping, moaning Myrtle...

Always about when Hermione is having a pee...

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 11:37:36 PM11/15/02
to
"Kirei" <kirei...@aol.comieatspam> wrote in message
news:20021115200953...@mb-cg.aol.com...

> >But I see this a lot, and not just with Harry and Draco. I see it with
> >Van and Dilandau, and Zim and Dib... And there's probably lots of
> >others. It's just annoying. Sometimes characters who seem to hate
> >each other actually really *do* hate each other. d-:
> >Oh, and I'm not sure about Harry and Ron, either. One reason I don't
> >see myself doing HP slash is that I can't think of any couples I like or
> >that would fit...
>
> ::runs past waving a Black x Lupin flag::

Well, yeah. ^_^ But if I did a story, I'd want to focus on the kids.

> In general, though, I agree with you. Most HP slash couples are
> just -icky- to me. O_o;; Especially stuff like Snape/Harry...
::shudder.::

GYAH! Yeah.

> I'm not really seeing Harry with anyone frankly in that sense. I mean,
> slash-wise.

Yeah.

> He really obviously likes Cho, and even though that relationship
> seems a little unlikely to me (particularly given the events of book 4),

Hard to say. But, yeah, regardless of his feelings, he'll back off out of
respect (I won't say more than that).

> there's nothing that leads me to see him as anything but straight. And
even
> if there -were- signs... who would he be paired with? He genuinely hates
> Draco, and... well, Ron and Hermione are just really cute. ^_^;;

I'm a Hermione Ron 'shipper, too. ^_^

> By the way, in case anyone didn't know this yet, JK Rowling _finally_
> finished book 5, and it should be coming out around March/April.

Umnmm.. No. This is false. There are NO hard facts about when the next
book will be out.

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 15, 2002, 11:46:06 PM11/15/02
to
"Freezer" <free...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns92C7C876EC421f...@130.133.1.4...

> Kirei - Come on down! You're the next contestant on
> rec.arts.anime.misc!
>

> > I'm not really seeing Harry with anyone frankly in that sense.
> > I mean, slash-wise. He really obviously likes Cho, and even
> > though that relationship seems a little unlikely to me (particularly
> > given the events of book 4),
>
> And especially since Cho's going to be Rowling's promised major
> character casualty... (Her, Neville, or one of the Weasley twins...)

And your info comes from where, exactly?
All she's said is that there will be a death that was hard for her to
write. It could be a teacher. It could be a student. It could be a
villain she likes. It could be Lupin, Black, or heavens knows who else.
IOW, it could be just about anyone (the *only* one I'd count out is Harry
himself). She said it was hard for her to write... She could like a
character we might not even think about or like, and killing that person
off would be hard for her. Heck, some people have even theorized that
Harry might end up having to kill someone (having your major character--a
15-year-old--have to kill someone could be a "difficult death" to write).

Catherine Johnson.
--
dis "able" to reply

Freezer

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 12:02:33 AM11/16/02
to
Fish Eye no Miko - Come on down! You're the next contestant on
rec.arts.anime.misc!

> "Freezer" <free...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns92C7C876EC421f...@130.133.1.4...
>
>> Kirei - Come on down! You're the next contestant on
>> rec.arts.anime.misc!
>>
>> > I'm not really seeing Harry with anyone frankly in that sense.
>> > I mean, slash-wise. He really obviously likes Cho, and even
>> > though that relationship seems a little unlikely to me
>> > (particularly given the events of book 4),
>>
>> And especially since Cho's going to be Rowling's promised major
>> character casualty... (Her, Neville, or one of the Weasley
>> twins...)
>
> And your info comes from where, exactly?

Pure opinion. I figure the death will either someone who'll hit
Harry hard (Which leaves out The Dursleys) or someone Rowling has a
soft spot for - which pretty much pins a big, fat "Curse Me!" sign on
Neville's back.


--
(So yeah, I think it'll be one of those four...)

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 12:21:39 AM11/16/02
to
"Freezer" <free...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns92C7EAB86BD13f...@130.133.1.4...

> Fish Eye no Miko - Come on down!

> > "Freezer" <free...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Kirei - Come on down!
> >>

> >> And especially since Cho's going to be Rowling's promised
> >> major character casualty... (Her, Neville, or one of the
> >> Weasley twins...)
> >
> > And your info comes from where, exactly?
>
> Pure opinion. I figure the death will either someone who'll hit
> Harry hard

Oooh.. How about Hagrid? That makes as much or more sense than any of the
others you've named...
And there's always that "Harry kills someone" idea.

> (Which leaves out The Dursleys) or someone Rowling has a
> soft spot for - which pretty much pins a big, fat "Curse Me!"
> sign on Neville's back.

Nah. I see big things for Neville. I'm not kidding. Though he could die
heroically, after realizing his potential.

> (So yeah, I think it'll be one of those four...)

Again, what about Hagrid? He seems to fit both your criteria.
I also think Dumbledore's in for it, but think that'll be book 6 or 7.

Catherine Johnson, who's probably gonna go ahead and shell out the money
for the hardcover version.


--
dis "able" to reply

"Oh, he makes me so mad! The horrible puny-brained meat child, with his
little glasses, and his... head! 'My name is Dib, with my pointy hair!'
Pointy hair! 'I eat food and have stuff!'."
-Zim, during one of his funnier rants, _Invader Zim_.

Freezer

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 12:38:54 AM11/16/02
to
Fish Eye no Miko - Come on down! You're the next contestant on
rec.arts.anime.misc!

> "Freezer" <free...@hotmail.com> wrote in message


> news:Xns92C7EAB86BD13f...@130.133.1.4...
>
>> Fish Eye no Miko - Come on down!
>> > "Freezer" <free...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Kirei - Come on down!
>> >>
>> >> And especially since Cho's going to be Rowling's promised
>> >> major character casualty... (Her, Neville, or one of the
>> >> Weasley twins...)
>> >
>> > And your info comes from where, exactly?
>>
>> Pure opinion. I figure the death will either someone who'll hit
>> Harry hard
>
> Oooh.. How about Hagrid? That makes as much or more sense than
> any of the others you've named...

Hmm... I've always been locked in on one of the students in this
regard. That makes a scary amount of sense.

Plus, we could get a scene where Snape makes one nasty comment too
many, and Harry gets physically medival on his ass.

> And there's always that "Harry kills someone" idea.

Hmm, again...

>> (Which leaves out The Dursleys) or someone Rowling has a
>> soft spot for - which pretty much pins a big, fat "Curse Me!"
>> sign on Neville's back.
>
> Nah. I see big things for Neville. I'm not kidding. Though he
> could die heroically, after realizing his potential.

I can honestly see Neville developing into a real badass, once he
gets past that Krillin-esqe wall of self-doubt...

--
(And assuming he lives long enough to reach that point...)

8-Bit Star

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 1:41:42 AM11/16/02
to

Freezer wrote:

> Fish Eye no Miko - Come on down! You're the next contestant on
> rec.arts.anime.misc!
>
> > "Freezer" <free...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns92C7EAB86BD13f...@130.133.1.4...
> >
> >> Fish Eye no Miko - Come on down!
> >> > "Freezer" <free...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Kirei - Come on down!
> >> >>
> >> >> And especially since Cho's going to be Rowling's promised
> >> >> major character casualty... (Her, Neville, or one of the
> >> >> Weasley twins...)
> >> >
> >> > And your info comes from where, exactly?
> >>
> >> Pure opinion. I figure the death will either someone who'll hit
> >> Harry hard
> >
> > Oooh.. How about Hagrid? That makes as much or more sense than
> > any of the others you've named...
>
> Hmm... I've always been locked in on one of the students in this
> regard. That makes a scary amount of sense.
>
> Plus, we could get a scene where Snape makes one nasty comment too
> many, and Harry gets physically medival on his ass.

If Harry hasn't offed Snape after the sucker being a total Asshole in
Book 3, Harry's never gonna off him.

Same goes for Draco Malfoy BTW (I mean, Malfoy indirectly committed
MURDER and he hasn't been punished yet? Made his meager appearance
in Goblet of Fire almost disappointing...)

D B Malmquist

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 1:46:19 AM11/16/02
to
osh wrote:
>
> Haripota nothing... anyone getting weird flashes of 'Peanuts' watching
> Azumanga Daioh?

Yes.

- dbm

The Eternal Lost Lurker (tomato o suki kaaaaaaa?)

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 3:39:44 AM11/16/02
to

"Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in message
news:kYjB9.19073$Ay3.1...@news1.west.cox.net...

>
> > By the way, in case anyone didn't know this yet, JK Rowling _finally_
> > finished book 5, and it should be coming out around March/April.
>
> Umnmm.. No. This is false. There are NO hard facts about when the next
> book will be out.

Actually...

Rowling was on A&E's Biography this week.

And she did indeed say that book five IS FINISHED.

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 10:23:32 PM11/16/02
to
"The Eternal Lost Lurker (tomato o suki kaaaaaaa?)"
<ell4...@sbcglowball.net> wrote in message
news:kvnB9.956$Vh3.39...@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...

> "Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote:
> >
> > Umnmm.. No. This is false. There are NO hard facts about when the
next
> > book will be out.
>
> Actually...
> Rowling was on A&E's Biography this week.
> And she did indeed say that book five IS FINISHED.

Which is pretty amazing, given that what you (and I) saw was a re-packaging
of a show called "Harry Potter and Me" that was made for British tv a year
ago. Unless she's been sitting on the book for a year?
What, precisely, was said on the show that made you think this, btw?

Catherine Johnson.
--
dis "able" to reply

Kirei

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 11:05:14 PM11/16/02
to
>> >But I see this a lot, and not just with Harry and Draco. I see it with
>> >Van and Dilandau, and Zim and Dib... And there's probably lots of
>> >others. It's just annoying. Sometimes characters who seem to hate
>> >each other actually really *do* hate each other. d-:
>> >Oh, and I'm not sure about Harry and Ron, either. One reason I don't
>> >see myself doing HP slash is that I can't think of any couples I like or
>> >that would fit...
>>
>> ::runs past waving a Black x Lupin flag::
>
>Well, yeah. ^_^ But if I did a story, I'd want to focus on the kids.

Well, one thing that's pretty popular with that couple is to focus on when
-they- were kids...

>> In general, though, I agree with you. Most HP slash couples are
>> just -icky- to me. O_o;; Especially stuff like Snape/Harry...
>::shudder.::
>
>GYAH! Yeah.

Gyah nothing, I've even heard of such horrifying combinations as
Snape/Hermione... there's a really bizarre little web RP that's pretty popular
right now called "Lumosnox" which features such choice pairings as, I kid you
not, Oliver Wood/Percy Weasley and Snape/Lupin. I think there's also something
supposedly going on with Flint/Wood too... (that sentence could lead to a
really bad pun).

>> I'm not really seeing Harry with anyone frankly in that sense. I mean,
>> slash-wise.
>
>Yeah.
>
>> He really obviously likes Cho, and even though that relationship
>> seems a little unlikely to me (particularly given the events of book 4),
>
>Hard to say. But, yeah, regardless of his feelings, he'll back off out of
>respect (I won't say more than that).

That's what I meant, really. It's not that a relationship between them is
-impossible-, but... I can't see him going for it now.

>> there's nothing that leads me to see him as anything but straight. And
>even
>> if there -were- signs... who would he be paired with? He genuinely hates
>> Draco, and... well, Ron and Hermione are just really cute. ^_^;;
>
>I'm a Hermione Ron 'shipper, too. ^_^

I really think they're going to wind up together if neither of them dies/turns
evil/etc. They're just like, perfect.

>> By the way, in case anyone didn't know this yet, JK Rowling _finally_
>> finished book 5, and it should be coming out around March/April.
>
>Umnmm.. No. This is false. There are NO hard facts about when the next
>book will be out.

Well, the hard fact is that the book _is_ done, according to the author itself,
and just needs maybe a little more tweaking before going to the publishers.
I've -heard- that this means it should be coming out in the next six months or
so.

Kirei

unread,
Nov 16, 2002, 11:11:12 PM11/16/02
to
>> > Umnmm.. No. This is false. There are NO hard facts about when the
>next
>> > book will be out.
>>
>> Actually...
>> Rowling was on A&E's Biography this week.
>> And she did indeed say that book five IS FINISHED.
>
>Which is pretty amazing, given that what you (and I) saw was a re-packaging
>of a show called "Harry Potter and Me" that was made for British tv a year
>ago. Unless she's been sitting on the book for a year?
>What, precisely, was said on the show that made you think this, btw?

Alright, as it turns out, I and many other people seem to have been wrong. I'm
not sure about that yet, though, since I got my information from a pretty
reliable source, but looking up stuff, here's what I found:

According to the Toronto Star, Rowling says she's "got a lot of book done, and
wants to tweak it just a little bit more before giving it to the publishers."
According to CBBC Newsround, as of May this year, Scholastic was claiming the
book would be no later than June 2003, and apparently no later date has been
set, since every Harry Potter info site I can find has that listed as the
probable publishing date.

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 17, 2002, 12:15:20 AM11/17/02
to
"Kirei" <kirei...@aol.comieatspam> wrote in message
news:20021116230514...@mb-fe.aol.com...

> >> ::runs past waving a Black x Lupin flag::
> >
> >Well, yeah. ^_^ But if I did a story, I'd want to focus on the kids.
>
> Well, one thing that's pretty popular with that couple is to focus on
when
> -they- were kids...

No.. I want to focus on THE kids, not *some* kids. As in Harry-tachi.

> >> In general, though, I agree with you. Most HP slash couples are
> >> just -icky- to me. O_o;; Especially stuff like Snape/Harry...
> >::shudder.::
> >
> >GYAH! Yeah.
>
> Gyah nothing, I've even heard of such horrifying combinations
> as Snape/Hermione...

Yep, I've heard of this...

> there's a really bizarre little web RP that's pretty popular right
> now called "Lumosnox"

Interesting name.. ^_^
<"Lumos" makes your wand like up so you can see in the dark. You say "nox"
to extinguish the light.>

> which features such choice pairings as, I kid you not, Oliver Wood/Percy
> Weasley

Now, what's so bad about this one? They're only about a year apart, and
there's no evidence they're enemies or anything. And they can both be kind
of obsessive... I could see it, kinda. It's certainly not "gyah"-worthy.
^_^

> and Snape/Lupin.

These two don't like each other much... so... no.

> I think there's also something supposedly going on with Flint/Wood

Oh, captain, my captain! ^_^
BTW, do you realize that Flint's in his*eight* year in the third book...?
At a school that only last seven years... Oops. ^_^

> too... (that sentence could lead to a really bad pun).

Well the actor who plays Wood is named Biggerstaff... <snicker>

> >> He really obviously likes Cho, and even though that relationship
> >> seems a little unlikely to me (particularly given the events of book
4),
> >
> >Hard to say. But, yeah, regardless of his feelings, he'll back off out
of
> >respect (I won't say more than that).
>
> That's what I meant, really. It's not that a relationship between them is
> -impossible-, but... I can't see him going for it now.

Yeah. )-:

> >> there's nothing that leads me to see him as anything but straight. And
> >> even if there -were- signs... who would he be paired with? He
genuinely
> >> hates Draco, and... well, Ron and Hermione are just really cute. ^_^;;
> >

> >I'm a Hermione/Ron 'shipper, too. ^_^


>
> I really think they're going to wind up together if neither of them
dies/turns
> evil/etc. They're just like, perfect.

Indeed. Awwww...

> >> By the way, in case anyone didn't know this yet, JK Rowling _finally_
> >> finished book 5, and it should be coming out around March/April.
> >
> >Umnmm.. No. This is false. There are NO hard facts about when the next
> >book will be out.
>
> Well, the hard fact is that the book _is_ done, according to the author
itself,

The author is a she.

> and just needs maybe a little more tweaking before going to the
publishers.

It's done... but it needs tweaking. Those are two contradictory
statements, you realize?
It's amazing how many people take this quote as proof it's done. How can
it be "done" if it needs "tweaking"?!

> I've -heard- that this means it should be coming out in the next six
months or
> so.

<spliced from another post>

> Alright, as it turns out, I and many other people seem to have been
wrong.

> I'm not sure about that yet, though, since I got my information from a


pretty
> reliable source, but looking up stuff, here's what I found:
> According to the Toronto Star, Rowling says she's "got a lot of book
done,
> and wants to tweak it just a little bit more before giving it to the
publishers."

Exactly.

> According to CBBC Newsround, as of May this year, Scholastic was claiming
> the book would be no later than June 2003

Info that's half a year old. Besides, Scholastic really has no control
over when the book will be done. They can claim it will be done tomorrow,
but that doesn't mean squat.

> and apparently no later date has been set, since every Harry Potter info
> site I can find has that listed as the probable publishing date.

"Probably" being the operative word.

Catherine Johnson.
--
dis "able" to reply

Right now you are reading my .sig quote.


Kirei

unread,
Nov 17, 2002, 1:11:39 AM11/17/02
to
>
>> >> ::runs past waving a Black x Lupin flag::
>> >
>> >Well, yeah. ^_^ But if I did a story, I'd want to focus on the kids.
>>
>> Well, one thing that's pretty popular with that couple is to focus on
>when
>> -they- were kids...
>
>No.. I want to focus on THE kids, not *some* kids. As in Harry-tachi.

Well, "the kids" could mean specifically Harry & Co., or just Hogwartsians...
if you mean specifically Harry & Co., well, that's different.

>> >> In general, though, I agree with you. Most HP slash couples are
>> >> just -icky- to me. O_o;; Especially stuff like Snape/Harry...
>> >::shudder.::
>> >
>> >GYAH! Yeah.
>>
>> Gyah nothing, I've even heard of such horrifying combinations
>> as Snape/Hermione...
>
>Yep, I've heard of this...

Brr.

>> there's a really bizarre little web RP that's pretty popular right
>> now called "Lumosnox"
>
>Interesting name.. ^_^
><"Lumos" makes your wand like up so you can see in the dark. You say "nox"
>to extinguish the light.>

For an interesting RPG, believe me... x.x

>> which features such choice pairings as, I kid you not, Oliver Wood/Percy
>> Weasley
>
>Now, what's so bad about this one? They're only about a year apart, and
>there's no evidence they're enemies or anything. And they can both be kind
>of obsessive... I could see it, kinda. It's certainly not "gyah"-worthy.
>^_^

Not so much gyah as much as I have _no_ _idea_ where they pulled that one from.
And... Percy. O_o; It's... Percy.
Also there's the part where he has a girlfriend and all...

>> and Snape/Lupin.
>
>These two don't like each other much... so... no.

Not as bad as Snape/Black, but pretty bad.

>> I think there's also something supposedly going on with Flint/Wood
>
>Oh, captain, my captain! ^_^
>BTW, do you realize that Flint's in his*eight* year in the third book...?
>At a school that only last seven years... Oops. ^_^

Actually, the son of the president of Scholastic goes to my school. A good
friend of mine mentioned the eighth-year thing to him, and a month or so later
he got a signed copy of the fourth book with the following inscription:
"Good spotting! Actually, Marcus is so stupid that he had to repeat a year...
-- JK Rowling."

>> too... (that sentence could lead to a really bad pun).
>
>Well the actor who plays Wood is named Biggerstaff... <snicker>

That wasn't the pun I was thinking of, hentai! ><;;

>> >> He really obviously likes Cho, and even though that relationship
>> >> seems a little unlikely to me (particularly given the events of book
>4),
>> >
>> >Hard to say. But, yeah, regardless of his feelings, he'll back off out
>of
>> >respect (I won't say more than that).
>>
>> That's what I meant, really. It's not that a relationship between them is
>> -impossible-, but... I can't see him going for it now.
>
>Yeah. )-:

Just means Harry will have to find someone new... (Slash fangirls: Like Draco!)

>> >> there's nothing that leads me to see him as anything but straight. And
>> >> even if there -were- signs... who would he be paired with? He
>genuinely
>> >> hates Draco, and... well, Ron and Hermione are just really cute. ^_^;;
>> >
>> >I'm a Hermione/Ron 'shipper, too. ^_^
>>
>> I really think they're going to wind up together if neither of them
>dies/turns
>> evil/etc. They're just like, perfect.
>
>Indeed. Awwww...
>
>> >> By the way, in case anyone didn't know this yet, JK Rowling _finally_
>> >> finished book 5, and it should be coming out around March/April.
>> >
>> >Umnmm.. No. This is false. There are NO hard facts about when the next
>> >book will be out.
>>
>> Well, the hard fact is that the book _is_ done, according to the author
>itself,
>
>The author is a she.

D'oh. That's what comes of trying to write a
complaining-about-lack-of-gender-neutral-pronoun IM and a newsgroup post at the
same time...

>> and just needs maybe a little more tweaking before going to the
>publishers.
>
>It's done... but it needs tweaking. Those are two contradictory
>statements, you realize?
>It's amazing how many people take this quote as proof it's done. How can
>it be "done" if it needs "tweaking"?!

Easily. I can see it's been awhile since you were a student... I.E. "Well, it's
done, but can I have an extra day to tweak it...?"

>> I've -heard- that this means it should be coming out in the next six
>months or
>> so.
>
><spliced from another post>
>
>> Alright, as it turns out, I and many other people seem to have been
>wrong.
>> I'm not sure about that yet, though, since I got my information from a
>pretty
>> reliable source, but looking up stuff, here's what I found:
>> According to the Toronto Star, Rowling says she's "got a lot of book
>done,
>> and wants to tweak it just a little bit more before giving it to the
>publishers."
>
>Exactly.
>
>> According to CBBC Newsround, as of May this year, Scholastic was claiming
>> the book would be no later than June 2003
>
>Info that's half a year old. Besides, Scholastic really has no control
>over when the book will be done. They can claim it will be done tomorrow,
>but that doesn't mean squat.

True, but lack of any other info on the info sites probably means that at least
no other date has been announced...

>> and apparently no later date has been set, since every Harry Potter info
>> site I can find has that listed as the probable publishing date.
>
>"Probably" being the operative word.

Again, I admit this is true.

The Eternal Lost Lurker (tomato o suki kaaaaaaa?)

unread,
Nov 17, 2002, 3:12:36 AM11/17/02
to

"Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in message
news:IBFB9.21920$Ay3.2...@news1.west.cox.net...

> It's done... but it needs tweaking. Those are two contradictory
> statements, you realize?
> It's amazing how many people take this quote as proof it's done. How can
> it be "done" if it needs "tweaking"?!

Speaking as a writer myself...

It's quite possible for a story to be finished, ready to publish, but the
writer still wants go back through it a couple times and pick it over for an
odd turn of phrase that doesn't quite sound right, or a minor detail that
the author overlooked or accidentally miscued somewhere along the way that
needs fixing.

If I were Jo Rowling, and the fifth Potter book being as highly anticipated
as it is, I'd be sure to go over it with my editor at least ten times to
weed out any imperfections before declaring it finalized.

Doesn't mean the book itself isn't finished. It just means she's making sure
there aren't any errant chips or cracks in the diamond. :)

The Eternal Lost Lurker (tomato o suki kaaaaaaa?)

unread,
Nov 17, 2002, 3:12:44 AM11/17/02
to

"Kirei" <kirei...@aol.comieatspam> wrote in message
news:20021117011139...@mb-fe.aol.com...

>
> Just means Harry will have to find someone new... (Slash fangirls: Like
Draco!)

I have this queer feeling Harry is going to wind up with Ginny.

Unless Rowling pulls a Luke on him, which I'd really hate to see happen.

Fish Eye no Miko

unread,
Nov 17, 2002, 5:12:07 PM11/17/02
to
"The Eternal Lost Lurker (tomato o suki kaaaaaaa?)"
<ell4...@sbcglowball.net> wrote in message
news:UbIB9.2927$%07.922...@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...

> "Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote:
>
> > It's done... but it needs tweaking. Those are two contradictory
> > statements, you realize?
> > It's amazing how many people take this quote as proof it's done. How
> > can it be "done" if it needs "tweaking"?!
>
> Speaking as a writer myself...

As am I...

> It's quite possible for a story to be finished, ready to publish, but the
> writer still wants go back through it a couple times and pick it over for
an
> odd turn of phrase that doesn't quite sound right, or a minor detail that
> the author overlooked or accidentally miscued somewhere along the way
that
> needs fixing.

Which means it's not finished, imo. To me "finished" means available for
reading. If you're still, picking over "an odd turn of phrase" or "minor
details" then you're not finished.

> If I were Jo Rowling, and the fifth Potter book being as highly
> anticipated as it is, I'd be sure to go over it with my editor at
> least ten times to weed out any imperfections before declaring
> it finalized.

Of course.

> Doesn't mean the book itself isn't finished.

Yeah, it actually does, imo.

Catherine Johnson.
--
dis "able" to reply

sanjian

unread,
Nov 17, 2002, 11:57:57 PM11/17/02
to
"Galen Musbach" <musb...@xtn.net> wrote in message
news:f1g9tu4et7307kg27...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:18:39 GMT, D B Malmquist

> >Chiyo - Ravenclaw.
> >Sakaki - Ravenclaw? Gryffindor?
> Gryffindor. She never backs back down from the challenge
> of the woman-eating cat.

Yes, but can you imagine her, the first time Yukari-sensei turned into a
cat?


sanjian

unread,
Nov 17, 2002, 11:59:29 PM11/17/02
to
"Hand-of-Omega" <smili...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:27420f11.02111...@posting.google.com...
> D B Malmquist <d.b.ma...@com.swap-com-and-rcn.rcn> wrote in message
news:<3DD4A395...@com.swap-com-and-rcn.rcn>...

> > Fish Eye no Miko wrote:

> Heh. What about the Azu-teachers? Kimura teaching Defense against the
> Dark Arts? Yukari's Potions class? Not sure where Nyamo would fit
> in...^_^

Broom handling and Quidditch.


sanjian

unread,
Nov 18, 2002, 9:51:04 AM11/18/02
to
"Fish Eye no Miko" <cath...@feablenm.net> wrote in message
news:XuUB9.26608$Ay3.2...@news1.west.cox.net...

> > It's quite possible for a story to be finished, ready to publish, but
the
> > writer still wants go back through it a couple times and pick it over
for
> an
> > odd turn of phrase that doesn't quite sound right, or a minor detail
that
> > the author overlooked or accidentally miscued somewhere along the way
> that
> > needs fixing.
>
> Which means it's not finished, imo. To me "finished" means available for
> reading. If you're still, picking over "an odd turn of phrase" or "minor
> details" then you're not finished.

Indeed. If someone at work tells me he's "done" with a sump, and I go to
put oil in it, he's going to have some 'splaining to do if oil comes out the
manways. "But when I said I was done, I meant that the nuts were
hand-tight." isn't going to cut it. Likewise, when you go to get your oil
changed, "done" doesn't mean "the filter's in, but we haven't added new oil
yet" (y'all do insist that the filter gets changed, don't ya?).

And before you ask.... yes, I did know someone who got her oil changed, and
the place didn't put new oil in. Reinforced, yet again, why I don't let
those clowns touch my truck.


0 new messages