Alas, I must confess to being part of the great unwashed masses,
and humbly beg for a reasonable definition of what constitutes true
Art Deco styling from my peers, specifically relating to vintage radios.
One particular question: can a modern radio depict Art Deco styling
and still be called an example of "art deco"?
I know that the Radio Shack knockoffs of vintage radios are not true
"antiques", but wonder if the same rules apply to whatever real
art deco is...
(To the many others wondering the
samething, who are sitting back letting me look stupid first.
Shame on you!)
Peter
As son of a line of architects and art historians, I should be able to
answer that or try at least.
Art Deco was a style created specificly to dress up machines. In the
early stages of a technology, everything is functional and sparton
looking i.e. AK breadboard, Benz's and Duryeas's first cars. Then it
gets dressed up to look like the accepted, older products- phonos and
radios in cabinets that look like china cabinets and are furniture
styled, horseless carriages. Deco was a way to put a feminine edge on a
cabinet, etc. and add pleasing details- *without* concealing and often
emphasising the technical nature of the apparatus in question. It was a
path between the previous choices- modernism, which required no
concealment, instead brutal honesty, in aesthtic treatment of technical
function (Frank Lloyd Wright used to love to put a big steam radiator
about 3 feet out from the center of a giant window-"Look at me! I'm a
radiator!"- a focus of the room) and traditional aesthics, which
concealed all function. This involved endless panels, mouldings, and
sometimes foolish bric a brac ala the Titanic main stairwell (one of the
the reasons the bulkheads only went to E deck). The lack of
functionality in this decor becomes apparent later in the film when it
is too late to make the paneling into lifeboats. Wright would have put
the lifeboats as the main focus of the deck and painted them a sober
gray. Art Deco would have made them look so good people would have
wanted more there for ornaments. Traditional Victorian British aesthtics
said "Ugh, how cluttered the decks look- let's leave 1/2 off the
specifications."
As far as a look goes, then, think of modern but with curvy, not
straight edges. Ornamented, but not garishly so. Functional, but not
overly masculine. In short, it looks a bit like the Chrysler building.
That's Deco.
John H.
The problem is there wasnt anybody back then that either named, patented,
registered, or took credit for the "art deco" look, it just sorta
evolved as a reaction to the previous "looks".
So you'll never see an ad in a 1935 Post magazine, saying "Buy the new
1935 Zenith with the wonderful Art Deco Styling!".
The look was only named in hindsight, and even now isnt used outside the
USA, I think.
John wrote in message <6d96qm$1...@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>...
>CommQuart wrote:
>>
>. Wright would have put
>the lifeboats as the main focus of the deck and painted them a sober
>gray. >That's Deco.
>
>John H.
>
Gaaa.... You have roiled the waters, I remain more confused than ever.
It almost sounds like your describing my SX-42, but that was the
product of Raymond Loewy's firm.
Peter
At Your Service,
Bob
I don't know- all I can tell you is Deco is like what Tipper Gore said
about porn- well, I know it when I see it. Let me be clear I was saying
Frank Lloyd Wright was almost a complete modernist- I'm certain he found
Art Deco too gaudy for his tastes. To me it is an easily recognized and
defined style. I accidentally decorated my entire house in Art Deco
because a lot of good furniture and a couple of consoles appeared over
the summer that were too cheap to resist.
A cathedral radio is not Deco. Its design harkens back to the Gothic
era. Its lines are wrong. For Deco, you must have the hard masculine
edge rounded or at least dressed up ala RCA consoles of 1939 or so (I
have a K-50) and a cathedral lacks this feature. Now, everyone get out
your Bunis 4 (I've always wanted to sound like Randy) and follow along.
Page 114, Howard model 225- a real clean example. Fairly minimalist
though- I forgot to mention yes, Cubism's influence is visible in the
frequent use of diagonal veneering and other contrasting grain
orientations. Page 147, Philco 15X- NOT Deco. It's all traditional
styling- neo-Greco/Roman. Nearly all function concealed. Page 149 Philco
38-9- an excellent example of Deco. Across pages 151-153, Deco is
everywhere or at least strong influences. Note the contrasting angled
and curvy veneers in the Philco 40-501- this is very characteristic of
the style. Often it is curly maple (feminine element) inlaid with narrow
strips of diagonal grain or angled strips of straight grain (masculine
element). The technical and decorative must compare, constrast, and
complement each other. If you feel it is nearly pure function or pure
ornament, it isn't Deco. Page 167- Pla-Pal fairly hard edged here but
pretty ornamented as well so the softening of the "techy" look is
apparent. For Bakelite, page 233 Zenith 4-B-422. Also Westinghouse
WR-120 page 230 but this is again more Deco influenced than directly
derived.
Oh, and your Zenith 7-S-432 and my 8-S-432 (thanks to those who helped
me realise the difference) are Deco influenced. The curved left side
with the horizontal bars is anyway.
Is that any clearer :) ?
John H.
-\--\--\
| | | <-Three rounded planes intersected by a perpendicular one.
-|--|--|-)
-/ / /
I'm neither a historian or an art expert, I just live here in Los
Angeles where Art Deco is revered by many. The movie "Xanadu" was
filmed at the Pacific Auditorium shortly before it (mysteriously)
burned down, ending a long fight with a developer. It was an Art Deco
landmark. Also see "The Shadow" and "Dick Tracy", if I remember them
right.
Unfortunately the German radios I'm currently interested
(Telefunkens, Grundigs) in are built with Danish Modern cabinets,
which are square boxes made of blonde wood. Art Deco radios were
molded of Bakelite or Polystyrene (plastic). Juke boxes of the period
were great examples of Art Deco.
Mark Van Nordstrand in North Hollywood, CA, USA
> The look was only named in hindsight, and even now isnt used outside the
> USA, I think.
Pardon? The name was coined as direct result of a style first noted at the
_Exposition des Arts Decoratifs_ in Paris (France) about 1928 (may have
been a year either side or so). That's where the name Art Deco came from
and it is widely used in Europe.
However, I do agree the term was used widely only in retrospect, just as
the Victorians did not talk about 'Victorian architecture' in their day;
they just called it 'Gothic' or 'Pointed' or possibly even 'contemporary',
although 'Contemporary' with a capital C is a term now applied to mid/late
1950s style.
Andrew Emmerson/Midshires Mediatech/405 Alive
tel: 07000-405625, international +44 1604-844130
fax: 01604-821647, international +44 1604-821647
Bill
Art deco was followed by "art moderne," a rounded
> style without formal ornament. 1940s Philco radios are not art deco--they are
> art moderne.
Thank you for that helpful lesson. Excuse me, I gracefully remove foot
from mouth. I do see examples of ornamented rounded styles and still
don't as clearly distinguish the two as you do. I should mention I do
know for certain Art Deco drew inspiration as well from the Eygptian and
Mayan temple designs discovered in the late 20's.
John H.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Todd Branstner
Friend of Old Houses, Old Radios, and
more junk than I can possibly find space for.
Home Page: http:/members.aol.com/toddbranst/
Bill
Andrew Emmerson wrote in message ...
>In article <6d9a70$d67$1...@shadow.skypoint.net>, g...@foundsys.com (George
R.
>Gonzalez) wrote:
>
>> The look was only named in hindsight, and even now isnt used outside
the
>> USA, I think.
>
>Pardon? The name was coined as direct result of a style first noted at
the
>_Exposition des Arts Decoratifs_ in Paris (France) about 1928 (may have
>been a year either side or so).
That may be. The info I got was from a newspaper article that claimed
IIRC that the term wasnt widely used elsewhere, or maybe I read it wrong.
>
>However, I do agree the term was used widely only in retrospect, just as
>the Victorians did not talk about 'Victorian architecture' in their day;
>they just called it 'Gothic' or 'Pointed' or possibly even
'contemporary',
>although 'Contemporary' with a capital C is a term now applied to
mid/late
>1950s style.
Oh goody, now I have a name for all those ugly 50's AA5 radios! :)
Regards,
George
-- Greg Farmer
I had a real smart comment for this one, but I am holding back.
Pete
super wagon wrote in message
<6dirkc$bp5$1...@newsd-142.iap.bryant.webtv.net>...
NO, NO, NO, 'tis not "What is Art Deco?", but "Who was Art Deco?". My
grandfather explained this to me in a bar many years ago. Arthur Deco
was a down and out architect who wanted to design simple, spartan, and
functional everyday products. He did mostly freelance work, and his
architectual background shows through in the AirKing line, but he
finally landed a job with Philco. His first effort there was to design a
table radio that prevented anyone from setting a drink on top of it.
This became the cathedral radio. Unfortunately, his plan backfired, as
his designs were considered not functional at all, but asthetically
pleasing. Later in life, he foisted "Decopage" (art? with paper and
glue) on an unsuspecting world.
Jim Cross
Art Deco is not something that can be *explained*. I believe it was
first exhibited in Paris in 1925 or so, and that the name *art deco*
comes from a contraction of a French term.
Chuck
Chuck Schwark, Chicago, IL
Antique Radio Club of Illinois (Elgin)
Antique Radio Resource Page:
http://members.aol.com/caschwark/index.htm
Home of the PHILCO REPAIR BENCH
The date of the piece is a very good guide--1925-1935 approximately.. Anything
outside that period is very unlikely to be art deco. And anything made today
can't be art deco--if it resembled art deco it would be designated "art deco
style." These are standard criteria used in the design business--there's no
mystery about it although admittedly there are fringe items that might or might
not be considered art deco, just as there are some cars that might or might not
be considered "classic," etc.
Bill