--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "realpsychohistory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to realpsychohist...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to realpsyc...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_group_realpsychohistory&d=DwIBaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=9kP6ksLjLyio1EwgfSUAdA&m=Osk_DpjE_IhXhDy9rIDdGarNayB7FtU3Cx6x2uTKrf0&s=KAWBLbjLidbV5tTsfdKzhQc1vevJgFUnrtbvSHHLdyY&e=.
For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwIBaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=9kP6ksLjLyio1EwgfSUAdA&m=Osk_DpjE_IhXhDy9rIDdGarNayB7FtU3Cx6x2uTKrf0&s=qFFSg84phiTNH4SFRPl-oDxMG0PRF6qt_CSpyjGbe_4&e=.
Hi there,
A few comments.
On the terms: I’ve been just reading about the religious wars in Europe, and I think putting value disagreements in religious and war-like terms might not be the best way to bring about hope. Paradoxically, the atheistic and materialistic philosophers, who thought that all men should be considered “evil” or selfish, there is no way out of that, and we must build states on that foundation, (Machiavelli, Hobbes) may have helped to bring about relative peace and prosperity after centuries of religious violence and poverty.
About Jim’s claims about religion and civilization, there might be something there especially in the Unites States, but there are many Christianities. My vague understanding is that early Christianity was more “socialist” even in hating the rich kind of way (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_a_needle). Most significantly it was preaching and practicing the equality of everybody, including slaves and state officials. The Roman empire seems to have had lots of “fascist” aspects and the Church may have taken some of that into itself when Christianity was made the state religion. And more recently, the religious right in the US does not seem particularly egalitarian.
In deMause’s psychohistory, “social justice warriors” may have previously been called “activists” and products of the helping mode childrearing.
In social psychology, you might be interested in Jonathan Haidt’s writings. He makes two relevant points based on his and colleagues’ research: liberals and conservatives have developed their innate moral tastes (potentialities) in different ways. Liberals have highly sensitive tastes for fairness and harm and do not see anything else as morally relevant because they have not developed the tastes that conservatives also have for loyalty, purity, and hierarchy. Haidt also speaks for the toleration of different values. Loyalty, purity and hierarchy might serve evolutionarily adaptive functions and may have been important for building that “Western Civilization” and states and empires which may have been better than the state of nature in many respects. Therefore, they can be good and important, and not necessarily just irrational, cruel, and oppressive.
Esa
Lähettäjä: realpsyc...@googlegroups.com <realpsyc...@googlegroups.com> Puolesta James Sturges
Lähetetty: 2. toukokuutata 2019 6.32
Vastaanottaja: realpsyc...@googlegroups.com
Aihe: Re: Identity Politics
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to realpsychohist...@googlegroups.com.