Hi Holly,
In response to your email, and as a teacher of A level Philosophy and Critical Thinking in an FE College, and who also runs a Philosophy workshop for adults (in Reading) I'd say the following:
Learning in schools, colleges & universities in Britain today is undermined by:
(i) A performance culture in which knowledge only has an instrumental value for students i.e. as a means of getting them to the next level & one step closer to that high-paid job. Closely linked to this:
(ii) a targets culture in which teachers are under constant pressure to achieve percentage "benchmarks" for attendance, retention and exam results (as a result of this methodology of performance, directly imported by recent governments from the City, "hard" subjects are dropped, as are extra-curricular activities, and students are spoonfed for exams).
(iii) The ambient consumer and celebrity cultures which celebrate values which are antithetical to learning: appearance rather than reality, instant gratification rather than patience.
(iv) The very real social problems suffered by a large proportion of students (certainly the ones I teach): parents unemployed or in low-paid/insecure work, drug or alcohol addiction of parents/students themselves, poor housing and inability to pay bills, mental health issues (a shocking incidence of self-harm and depression among my students).
In such a context, I have to say I do wonder about the value of "facilitating the learners to take control of the learning process" (something which is in fact already a mainstream objective and has been strongly encouraged by Ofsted for several years now). I wonder about this on several counts:
1. Is it a realistic objective in the context I have described?
2. Is it the most urgent objective, given the other issues - internal and external to education - which I have raised?
3. On a deeper level, is it even a desirable objective? It sounds and feels good & has a radical ring to it, but don't we need to be on the lookout for false radicalism? Will children ever really be capable of taking control of their own learning? Aren't adults there to guide, and even on occasion to enforce, until young people have developed enough self-discipline and understanding of the value of knowledge to take control of their own learning (if this is achieved by the age of 18 then I'd say that is a major success for the individual and the community)?
As you will have guessed, I have serious doubts on all three points, but I would love to hear your views and those of others.
Apart from these points, I'm certainly interested in following & contributing to the Radical Teaching Collective, which I think is an excellent idea.
Best wishes,
Peter
| getting students to own their learning was exactly what i was taught to do when given teacher training for adults when i taught at the university of sussex. i did not find it either radical or particularly useful in broadening the outlook of students in need of motivation. best wishes, dr. peter pick --- On Thu, 26/7/12, Peter Coville <peterc...@googlemail.com> wrote: |
Does the radical teaching thing need to be once a week? I can't manage that as I have a lot of other commitments & live in Reading. I'd favour a monthly plenary with working groups if necessary at other times - but will bow to the consensus.
Peter x
And the Radical Teaching Collective meeting?
Holly - I won't be able to come to first meeting anyway as I'm in Portugal till 6 Aug. Also, as I live in Reading, generally like to be on the 2115 from Paddington if I'm working the next day.
Peter x