The "honeymoon" is over. Whereas decent people everywhere have been
giving this President the benefit of the doubt, continuing to like the
man, despite despising his agenda, he has now made any further such
affection difficult to the point of being humanly impossible.
Is is hard to imagine what sort of an "American" could possibly
countenance such disgraceful, spineless kow-towing to the forces of
oppression and tyranny in this world. If the United States is not all
about stepping forward against just that, then the United States is
about nothing.
It is embarrassing to have such a toady, such an utter quisling as the
chief representative of this country, and the cheeks of every American
should be burning with shame.
Thankfully, now that it is possible to see the complete lack of
substance in Obama the man, there should no longer be any question
about his policies and his agenda: there is nothing respectable or
responsible or brave or basically American about any of it.
The cost of a pack of cigarettes has gone up, not only double, but
that again by half to fund this tyrant's "healthcare" agenda, and it
is driving the working class into poverty and crime. Is it this which
has the Tea Party people comparing him to Hitler? Or is it his
intention to decide for people what they will have under the hoods of
their pickup trucks? Will he make it impossible for your average
country dweller to drive home with a load of fire-wood, without
burning up his engine, or to drive in the mountains, plow the snow
from a long driveway?
He's poking his nose into the people's business way in deep where a
spoiled little city boy's nose doesn't belong.
Yup. The honeymoon is OVER!
--
JM
http://whosenose.blogspot.com
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
> Would it be wrong to call [the Dalai Lama] a CIA funded dictator in exile who has
> acquired democratic pretensions?
Whereas my reply goes as follows . . .
Is there anything "wrong" with the Dalai Lama's escape in 1959 from
capture by the Communist Chinese Army, simply because it was
engineered by the CIA? Or that the cause for an independent Tibet,
and the well being of the Tibetan diaspora has been allegedly aided by
U.S. funds administered through the CIA? Your implication would be
that the Dalai Lama should have refused the aid, that he might now be
rotting in a Red Chinese prison.
As to your use of the term "dictator" in reference to the 24 year old
boy who previous to 1959 ruled by the consent of his people no
different than any Amazon rain forest shaman, Polynesian or Mongol
tribal chieftain, yes, I should say there is plenty wrong with your
use of that term, as we hear it bandied about otherwise most nearly
exclusively in the worldwide Russian and Red Chinese press. Try a
Google search on "Dalai Lama CIA" and see the preponderance of
whackjob and pinko wingnut hits you get.
And when was the last time a Russian, Arab, Egyptian, Palestinian or
Red Chinese dictator sat in the Oval Office with an American
president, only then to be ushered out to a waiting press on the White
House front steps? Compare the treatment of those dictators to that
of this beloved and benevolent religious head and ruler of his
people . . .
Let that image be burned into the hearts of Americans from now on to
the day of the next presidential election, and let them consider the
quality of 'compassion' in the heart of the man who would perpetrate
such a disgrace. Consider also that the same thing is being done with
an American economy, as it too goes out the door with the trash of a
pinko "healthcare" mess that has no place stinking up the environment
of a laissez-faire democracy.
--
JM