`poetry lock` required?

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Ben Wallberg

unread,
May 18, 2024, 2:36:46 PMMay 18
to rdfli...@googlegroups.com
I'm using the devcontainer for development, which uses Ubuntu 22 and installs python 3.10 for me.  When I perform a clean build from main, `task configure` usually fails saying poetry.lock is too out of date (though currently it says "Unable to read the lock file (Invalid statement (at line 743, column 5)).".  I then run `poetry lock` and `task configure` runs just fine.  Once my updates and tests are done I commit without including the updated poetry.lock. 

Does that sound like expected behavior and practice?

If yes, should I update the developers documentation? Would that go just under the "Development container" section or also under the general "go-task and Taskfile.yml" section?

Thank you,
Ben

--
Ben Wallberg
Senior Manager, Software Systems Development and Research
University of Maryland Libraries

Nicholas Car

unread,
May 18, 2024, 6:22:55 PMMay 18
to rdfli...@googlegroups.com
I think we have a bad situation with the poetry.lock file at least in the HEAD version of the rdflib repo just now due to a series of broken PR merges. Things should be better for a tagged release such as 7.0.0 or 6.3.0. Are you trying with those releases?

We should get to fixing HEAD in the next couple of weeks when I'm back from holiday.

Cheers, Nick
--
http://github.com/RDFLib
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rdflib-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rdflib-dev+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/CA%2B%3DO2t%2BNPkYPNBVV4wv3_TP%2BMeOTR-D4P_Fq37kA464sNfhKSQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Ben Wallberg

unread,
May 19, 2024, 7:14:02 AMMay 19
to rdfli...@googlegroups.com
No, I've been working on PRs and working from main, in order to have the latest code and avoid merge conflicts.  Perhaps for now I should base from 7.0.0, as passing validation is more important.  Thank you.



--
Ben Wallberg
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages