--
_______
/ |O| \ Clark in Georgia
###=======### USMC M60A1
###=======### KI4GYT
### ###
Composite construction certainly does reduce weight, but using aluminum
for the skin instead of cloth results in a less "durable" solution.
Specifically, the aluminum skin is more easily dented and punctured.
That skin would also be more difficult to paint and repair over time.
Since you are using epoxy as the bonding agent, why not simply go with a
cloth composite (glass, kevlar or carbonfiber) on a filler?
Regardless of the skin used, balsa cores are being replaced more and
more by expanded foams or true honeycombs which are lighter, stronger
and easier to work with. Balsa cores are notorious for having dense
areas that don't bond properly to the skin, resulting in blisters over
time. Furthermore, as you stated, they have a grain, so they have
different structural properties in different directions. Other cores
don't suffer from these problems.
As you stated, when building composite structures, you have to be
painfully aware of the structural deficiencies. All through holes have
to be reinforced because the core is exposed along the sides of the hole
and therefore have no strength. In full size sailboats, you drill a
larger hole than needed, fill with epoxy+filler, then drill the actual
hole. You also have to use backing plates or large washers to prevent
crushing the composite walls or pulling the mounting bolt through the skin.
Composites *can* yield a lighter (and stronger) vehicle (if used
properly), but they definitely require (a) more tooling, (b) more man
hours, (c) more money and (d) more design time than traditional wooden
box construction. Over the last 15 years of building boats and tanks,
I've determined that the best overall value comes from a skin-on-frame
construction approach, using wooden or metal frames for structure, a
thin plywood for skin and a thin fiberglass covering for durability. A
good compromise across all dimensions, combining the best aspects of
wood and composite construction.
That said, I plan on making the S-Tank hull from composites (probably
carbon fiber on expanded foam), with a welded aluminum chassis, with
molded plastic wheels and tracks riding on composite axles. But, I'm
not doing it to save money or time ... I'm doing it for the "cool"
factor :-)
Frank P.
Whoa there ... hold on ... any "profits" made from this mailing list are
taxable under the legal terms that you agreed to when you originally
joined the group. (I'm sure you saw the legal agreement in 0.2pt font
streaming past at 6,250 words per second when you joined.) Please be
sure to fill out the proper paperwork (in triplicate) and send your
advanced payment in advance to the Office of Advanced Payments before we
have to turn this matter over to our Office of Collections and Mass
Destruction.
Frank "Good Advice Is Never Free" Pittelli
That said, I plan on making the S-Tank hull from composites (probably
carbon fiber on expanded foam), with a welded aluminum chassis, with
molded plastic wheels and tracks riding on composite axles. But, I'm
not doing it to save money or time ... I'm doing it for the "cool"
factor :-)
Frank P.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Oxt8Myjv4c&NR=1
Have you seen this kind of movement? Goes to teh side
Impressive
C
>
> In an effort to minimize vehicle weight, I'm considering trying a
> balsa/aluminum sandwich construction for the hull of my first effort.
> I've built test panels, and they're quite light and strong.
Aircraft style construction for a tank! If you can bond the AL to the balsa
it will be impressively strong for its weight. If you try this, keep us
informed. What works? What doesn't? DSmith
Google a product called "diabond" its a plastic/aluminium composite
panel, I use it all the time at work, it can be routed and bent very
easily, and its very very light, its also very rigid. I plan on making
a tank out of it one day, after I finish my current 3, lol.
Chris. b