Re: [RBW] Which Phil BB for the Sugino XD-2 triple?

122 views
Skip to first unread message

Joss Winn

unread,
Aug 30, 2012, 2:11:21 AM8/30/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com

>
>
> Which Phil BB for the Sugino XD-2 triple?
> Joss Winn <jo...@josswinn.org> Aug 29 05:11PM +0100
>
> I just ordered a Sugino XD-2 triple from Rivendell and I'm wondering which Phil Wood BB I should order (to go on a Surly LHT). Rivendell don't specify exactly which Phil BB they are selling. Is it the 110.5 JIS taper or ISO?
>
> Thank you
> Joss
>
> PATRICK MOORE <bert...@gmail.com> Aug 29 12:56PM -0600
>
> I use a 113 with XD2 on my Fargo and it works just right with the 8-10
> sp 135 OL hubs. I expect I could go down to a 110, not that this would
> make a big difference to chainline or Q.
>

I found the Sugino website and they recommend either 110 or 113 JIS taper.

http://www.suginoltd.co.jp/english/product_crank_xd2_english.htm

Looks like the 111 or 113 are the best options:

http://www.philwood.com/products/bbpages/ssbb.php

Or at less than a 1/4 of the price, the Shimano UN55 is looking rather attractive :-)

Cheers
Joss


Stephen S

unread,
Aug 30, 2012, 2:37:24 PM8/30/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
I just bought the 113 UN55 for a 54 LHT. I haven't fit it yet but everything I saw was that it would fit well.

Stephen

Ginz

unread,
Aug 30, 2012, 2:57:36 PM8/30/12
to RBW Owners Bunch
I'm running the XD with the Phil 113 JIS and I generally get a 47.5mm
chainline from the middle ring, give or take a mm or two.

Dave

unread,
Aug 30, 2012, 3:49:22 PM8/30/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
Same here on my Ram.

grant

unread,
Aug 30, 2012, 10:17:11 PM8/30/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
The Tange 107 and 110 have the same right-side dimension. The 110 is 3mm longer on left for---let's not get obsessive about this--but 3mm more symmetrical Q. I don't know if Shimano's the same, but I bet... We used Phil 108s, but Phil others close wll work. They're adjustable. Not only one answer.


On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 11:11:21 PM UTC-7, Joss Winn wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages