I had a similar experience with a Ron's Ortho bar on a Hunqapillar. I went through a series of adjustments to try to make it feel right: stem height up and down, angle of grip, saddle fore and aft and saddle angle up and down, seat post higher and lower. Regardless of the various combinations of adjustments, my arms and shoulders felt too splayed out. As you and I have discussed on general issues of Hunq and Bomba fit, I'm a big guy with broad shoulders. I never imagined Orthos would be too wide, but splayed didn't work.
I tried very hard to like the bark, as so many people love them. But what I finally figured out was that the bar itself was the problem. It didn't make sense to readjust everything that I know already works for me to accommodate the Ortho, especially saddle height and saddle angle. When I finally acted on this epiphany and tried an Albatross (which felt great) and then went back to the Boscomoose (which felt even greater), I promptly sold the Ortho. It is one bar that I know there is no point for me to ever mess with again.
Another thing about the Ortho that is not strictly related to fit and adjustment was the amount of flex is displayed. Again, a lot of people seem to love the Ortho because of this extreme flex. For me it made riding feel unnerving and sometimes even treacherous, especially when there was slippage, which I could not avert even though I tried various stems, including a four-bolt faceplater.
So all in all, I had a rather unpleasant experience with the Ortho bar. But it taught me to appreciate the virtues of the various 'Moose bars, with the integrated stems. The extra stiffness feels better, more secure, and safer to me. I ride both 54 and 58 Boscomoose bars on different bikes and like them equally. Fortunately for me, the Angle of Boscomoose bars works just right for my hands and arms. The lack of angle adjustability, the biggest drawback of the bars, is thus a nonissue for me.
Good luck figuring it out!
Jim