Nitto R-10 vs Marks Rack for Saddlebag

793 views
Skip to first unread message

Peter M

unread,
Sep 26, 2012, 12:08:23 PM9/26/12
to RBW Owners Bunch
So I have been waxing and waning over whether to get the Bagman for my
Carradice Pendle. I just don think it is a good choice due to the
fact I want to just be able to mount it and not worry about it coming
loose and the fact that I dont want anything mounted to my saddle. I
was trying to decide now between the Nitto R-10 and the Marks Rack and
was wondering if anyone has used both or has first hand experience
with using either one with a sprung saddle and high profile brakes
(paul neo retro). Thanks to any advice yall can offer.

Peter

Allingham II, Thomas J

unread,
Sep 26, 2012, 3:21:11 PM9/26/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
Haven't used the R-10, but I had a Mark's Rack on the rear of my Quickbeam for a while. It worked well for support of saddlebags -- better than the Bagman I replaced it with.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
****************************************************

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this message was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
****************************************************
****************************************************

This email (and any attachments thereto) is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email (and any attachments thereto) is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original email (and any copy of any email) and any printout thereof.

Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their professional qualifications will be provided upon request.
****************************************************
==============================================================================

Peter Morgano

unread,
Sep 26, 2012, 3:42:35 PM9/26/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
Do you think there would be an interference problem with the high profile brakes? I mean do the struts for the marks clear them ok? I would prefer the Marks since if I do ever get another bag it has more than one use, unlike a dedicated saddlebag rack.

Allingham II, Thomas J

unread,
Sep 26, 2012, 3:49:27 PM9/26/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
Peter:
 
I have Paul Touring Cantis on the rear of the Quickbeam, so I can't be sure about clearance for Neo-Retros.  Can't recall whether clearance was tight with the Touring calipers.
 
Tom


From: rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com [mailto:rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Morgano
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:43 PM
To: rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RBW] Nitto R-10 vs Marks Rack for Saddlebag

Liesl

unread,
Sep 26, 2012, 5:29:18 PM9/26/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
I've ridden with a marks rack since 2006 with, most often, a Carradice Barley.  Most excellent combination.  Goes back and forth between my saluki and my protobleriot.  I have  small (50 cm) bikes so clearance for a saddle bag is always in the equation.  the marks rack is 1) easy to move from bike to bike, 2) stable as all get-out, 3) keeps bags from rubbing on fenders, 4) keeps saddle bags clear of cables, 5) is totally adjustable so you can dial in fore-and-aft and height, and 6) is so small you can just forget about it if you're not carrying a saddlebag.

I have no experience, though, with the R-10.

good luck, liesl 

ted

unread,
Sep 26, 2012, 7:32:04 PM9/26/12
to RBW Owners Bunch
I have used a Marks rack on my 52 Bombadil with cr-720s. Worked great.
No trouble with the brakes.
As Liesl points out it very flexible and versatile, up down, for aft,
tilt, whatever.

Manuel Acosta

unread,
Sep 26, 2012, 8:08:55 PM9/26/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
Nitto R-10 is pretty good. I've used both for a rear bag. I like the option of taking the R10 off and on whenever I can. Taking off and on a Mark's rack get's kinda annoying after a while. If you're using the Mark's rack for the rear with high profile brakes you'll need to fudge it to make it work. 
Ever thought of using nitto's r-14 is always a good rack to leave on forever for a saddle bag. 

numbnuts

unread,
Sep 27, 2012, 10:28:31 AM9/27/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
Hey Peter,
I can't help with the choosing part, but if you go the the 10 then I have one looking for a home.

All the best,
Chris
Redding, Ca.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages