I think they got a look at Rene's touring bar from nitto on his
atlantis and decided that with a little modification it could be
perfect and started work on it immediately.
That's my guess.
-sv
I don't understand. The height of the bar has little to do with the bar
itself, much more to do with the stem or the spacer stack and steerer.
There are (to some, rather hideous) photos aplenty of Rivendells with
drop bars easily 4" above the saddle.
> My cockpits range from about 1" to about 4" above my saddle... those
> are inches, not centimeters. But every trekking style bar I've seen
> (including the Nitto) was so fundamentally unattractive that I
> wouldn't want to use it even if it cost only $30. My opinion, of
> course. And I realize I may be denying myself the most luxurious
> mind-blowingly blissful riding experience known to man. But frankly,
> each handlebar I have has provided a pretty darn good riding
> experience. I don't lack for them. Except for the one that came on my
> Trek Hybrid. Ugh.
What makes for an attractive bar, for you?
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 09:11 -0700, Thomas Lynn Skean wrote:
> Hmmm... here's what I hope it isn't: a "trekking" bar. Those tend to
> meet my primary criteria for a bar: height.I don't understand. The height of the bar has little to do with the bar
itself, much more to do with the stem or the spacer stack and steerer.
There are (to some, rather hideous) photos aplenty of Rivendells with
drop bars easily 4" above the saddle.
> My cockpits range from about 1" to about 4" above my saddle... those
> are inches, not centimeters. But every trekking style bar I've seen
> (including the Nitto) was so fundamentally unattractive that I
> wouldn't want to use it even if it cost only $30. My opinion, of
> course. And I realize I may be denying myself the most luxurious
> mind-blowingly blissful riding experience known to man. But frankly,
> each handlebar I have has provided a pretty darn good riding
> experience. I don't lack for them. Except for the one that came on my
> Trek Hybrid. Ugh.What makes for an attractive bar, for you?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/dlVGuj5ZQdYJ.
It's going to be bullhorns!
:)
Yours,
Thomas Lynn Skean
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/ZbaQ10KKaGQJ.
Actually, I was envisioning something along the lines of a drop with
ends that loop back up and around at least one more time.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/iaIB0x1rkocJ.
Moots used to make a stem to facilitate that kind of double bar set
up! There's would've been stacked vertically. That was the old
Moots, however (they were also huge proponents of fenders... how times
change).
Couldn't track anything down on the internet about the stem, it was
from the 1980s. Anyone remember those? (sorry for the topic drift)
Stuart Fletcher
Seattle, WA